Method for evaluating value of equipment of building, equipment evaluation device, and computer-readable recording medium

Abstract

Traffic record information for one piece of maintenance management traffic stored in a traffic record DB 24 includes first information on a date at which the one piece of maintenance management traffic is implemented. Evaluation criterion information for one device stored in a device evaluation DB25 includes a value determination rule that determines an evaluation value indicating a value of the one device. The value determination rule of one device determines an evaluation value of the one device based on at least one of an elapsed period after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented with respect to the one device, a number of times of implementation, and an implementation frequency. An equipment evaluation device (1) acquires an evaluation value by applying first information of one or more maintenance management services to a value determination rule of evaluation criterion information for each of one or more pieces of equipment included in a specific building.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the value of equipment possessed by a building, an equipment evaluation device and a computer-readable recording medium. Background Art

[0002] Generally, in real estate evaluation, the economic value of land and buildings is evaluated. The following patent document describes a device that mainly evaluates the price of land and buildings as the price of real estate.

[0003] Prior art literature

[0004] Patent Literature

[0005] (Patent Document 1) Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2019-192081 Summary of the invention

[0006] Technical issues to be solved

[0007] For large-scale buildings such as hotels, office buildings, and apartments, the equipment (elevators, electrical equipment, air conditioning equipment, etc.) in the buildings is also large. Therefore, when evaluating the value of real estate, it is necessary to fairly evaluate not only the value of the land and buildings, but also the value of the equipment. However, in general, the evaluation objects of real estate appraisal are land and buildings, and the evaluation of equipment is not carried out.

[0008] For example, it can be said that equipment that has just been repaired and does not need to be repaired or replaced for the time being has a higher economic value than equipment that has aged and needs to be repaired or replaced immediately. That is, the state of the equipment varies depending on the actual performance of maintenance management work (repair, parts replacement, inspection, etc.), and the value of the equipment also varies depending on the state of the equipment. The existing real estate evaluation method shown in the above patent document mainly evaluates the price of land and buildings, and is not suitable for evaluating the value of equipment that can change according to the actual performance of maintenance management work.

[0009] The present invention is proposed in view of such circumstances, and its object is to provide a method, a device evaluation device, a program, and a computer-readable recording medium recording the program, which can evaluate the value of equipment in a building that can change according to the actual performance of maintenance management work.

[0010] Solutions to the problem

[0011] A first aspect of the present invention is a method performed by an equipment evaluation device for evaluating the value of equipment possessed by a building, wherein the equipment evaluation device can access one or more storage devices, and the one or more storage devices store business record information about records of one or more maintenance management services implemented for each of one or more equipment possessed by a specific building and evaluation standard information about evaluation standards for values ​​predetermined for each equipment, wherein the business record information for a maintenance management service includes first information about the date on which the maintenance management service was implemented, and the evaluation standard information for a device includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the device, and the value determination rule for a device determines the evaluation value of the device based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device, the number of implementations, and the frequency of implementation, and the equipment evaluation device has a first step, and the first step obtains the evaluation value of each equipment by applying the first information contained in the business record information of one or more maintenance management services to the value determination rule contained in the evaluation standard information for each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0012] Preferably, at least a portion of the business record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by implementing the maintenance management service, and at least a portion of the value determination rule determines the evaluation value of the equipment based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the equipment, the number of implementations and the implementation frequency and the status of the equipment updated by at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the equipment. The first process includes the following steps: for at least a portion of the equipment possessed by a specific building, an evaluation value is obtained by applying the first information and the second information contained in the business record information to the value determination rule contained in the evaluation standard information.

[0013] Preferably, at least a part of the value determination rules include a first rule and a second rule, the first rule determining the usable period during which a device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device, the number of implementations and the implementation frequency, and the state of the device updated by at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device, and the second rule determining the evaluation value of the device based on the usable period determined for the device, and the first process includes the following steps: for at least a part of the equipment possessed by a specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information contained in the business record information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information; and for the at least a part of the equipment, the evaluation value is obtained by applying the obtained usable period to the second rule contained in the evaluation standard information.

[0014] Preferably, at least a portion of the second information is one of deterioration degree information indicating the degree of deterioration of the equipment determined by the inspection service, repair information on the content of the repair performed on the equipment by the repair service, and replacement parts information on the parts of the equipment replaced by the parts replacement service, and at least a portion of the first rule includes at least one of the following provisions: according to the deterioration degree information, the higher the deterioration degree, the shorter the usable period; according to the repair information, the fewer the number of repairs and / or the more days that have passed since the last repair, the shorter the usable period; and according to the replacement parts information, the fewer the number of parts replacements and / or the more days that have passed since the last parts replacement, the shorter the usable period, and the first process includes at least one of the following steps: for at least one part of a specific building, For equipment of a specific building, by applying the deterioration degree information contained in the business record information and the first information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information, a usable period that is shorter as the degree of deterioration is higher is obtained; for equipment of at least a part of a specific building, by applying the repair information contained in the business record information and the first information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information, a usable period that is shorter as the number of repairs is less and / or the number of days that have passed since the last repair is more; and for equipment of at least a part of a specific building, by applying the replacement parts information contained in the business record information and the first information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information, a usable period that is shorter as the number of parts replacements is less and / or the number of days that have passed since the last parts replacement is more.

[0015] Preferably, one or more storage devices store component information about components of equipment replaceable through a component replacement service, the component information includes availability information indicating whether the component is available, and at least a portion of the first rule includes the following provision: when there is a component indicated as unavailable in the availability information, an upper limit of the usable period is determined based on the average component life of the component and the start date of use of the component, and the first process includes the following steps: for at least a portion of the equipment possessed by a specific building, when there is a component indicated as unavailable by the availability information included in the component information, a usable period shorter than the upper limit is obtained based on the average component life of the component and the start date of use of the component.

[0016] Preferably, at least a part of the second rule includes the following provisions: based on the usable period determined for a device, an evaluation value is determined according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the device, and the first process includes the following steps: by applying the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by a specific building to the second rule, an evaluation value is obtained according to the ratio of the obtained usable period to the equipment life.

[0017] Preferably, at least a part of the second rule includes the following provisions: based on the usable period determined for a device, an evaluation value is determined according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the device and the equipment introduction cost required to introduce the device, and the first process includes the following steps: by applying the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by a specific building to the second rule, an evaluation value is obtained according to the ratio of the obtained usable period to the equipment life and the equipment introduction cost.

[0018] Preferably, at least a part of the second rule includes the following provisions: based on the usable period determined for a device, an evaluation value is determined according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the device, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the device, and the maintenance management cost required for the maintenance and management of the device. The first process includes the following steps: by applying the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by a specific building to the second rule, an evaluation value is obtained according to the ratio of the obtained usable period to the equipment life, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance management cost.

[0019] Preferably, the method according to the first aspect includes a second step of acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value indicating the value of all the equipment included in the specific building based on the evaluation values ​​acquired for each of the one or more equipment included in the specific building.

[0020] The second aspect of the present invention is an equipment evaluation device, which evaluates the value of equipment possessed by a building, the equipment evaluation device comprising: a processing unit; and a storage unit, the storage unit storing instructions executed by the processing unit, the equipment evaluation device can access one or more storage devices, the one or more storage devices storing business record information about records of one or more maintenance management services implemented for each of one or more equipment possessed by a specific building and evaluation standard information about evaluation standards for values ​​predetermined for each equipment, the business record information for a maintenance management service includes first information about the date on which the maintenance management service is implemented, the evaluation standard information for a device includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the device, the value determination rule for a device determines the evaluation value of the device based on at least one of the elapsed period, number of implementations and implementation frequency after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device, and the processing performed by the processing unit according to the instructions includes each step of the method according to the above-mentioned first aspect.

[0021] The third aspect of the present invention is a program, which includes instructions that can be executed by an equipment evaluation device for evaluating the value of equipment possessed by a building. The equipment evaluation device can access one or more storage devices, and the one or more storage devices store business record information about records of one or more maintenance management services implemented for each of one or more equipment possessed by a specific building and evaluation standard information about evaluation standards for values ​​predetermined for each equipment. The business record information for a maintenance management service includes first information about the date on which the maintenance management service is implemented. The evaluation standard information for a device includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the device. The value determination rule for a device determines the evaluation value of the device based on at least one of the elapsed period, the number of implementations and the frequency of implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device. The processing performed by the processing unit in accordance with the instructions includes each step of the method according to the above-mentioned first aspect.

[0022] A fourth aspect of the present invention is a computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon the program according to the above-mentioned third aspect.

[0023] Effects of the Invention

[0024] According to the present invention, a method, a facility evaluation device, a program, and a computer-readable recording medium recording the program can be provided that can evaluate the value of facilities in a building that can change according to actual performance of maintenance and management work. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] Figure 1 This is a diagram showing an example of a system configuration according to the present embodiment.

[0026] Figure 2A and 2B These are diagrams for explaining information included in the equipment management information and the maintenance management work information.

[0027] Figure 3A , 3B 3C are diagrams for explaining information included in component information, business record information, and evaluation standard information, respectively.

[0028] Figure 4 This is a flowchart for explaining an example of the device evaluation method according to the present embodiment.

[0029] Figure 5 It is a diagram showing an example of a screen displaying evaluation results.

[0030] Figure 6 This is a flowchart for explaining an example of the process of acquiring the evaluation value.

[0031] Figure 7 This is a flowchart for explaining a modified example of the process of acquiring the evaluation value. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] Figure 1 This is a diagram showing an example of a system configuration according to the present embodiment. Figure 1 The system shown in the example of FIG. 1 includes a device evaluation device 1 and a user terminal device 3 that can communicate with each other via a communication network 9 such as the Internet.

[0033] The equipment evaluation device 1 is a device for evaluating the value of equipment in a building. Figure 1 In the example of , the equipment evaluation device 1 evaluates the value of equipment in a specific building based on a request from the user terminal device 3, and displays the evaluation result on the screen of the user terminal device 3. For example, the equipment evaluation device 1 includes one or more computers (such as a computer group providing cloud computing) connected to the communication network 9. Figure 1 The device evaluation device 1 shown in the example of FIG. 1 includes a communication unit 11 , a storage unit 12 , and a processing unit 13 .

[0034] The communication unit 11 communicates with other devices (such as the user terminal device 3) via the communication network 9. The communication unit 11 includes a device (such as a network interface card) that communicates in accordance with a predetermined communication standard such as Ethernet (registered trademark) or wireless LAN.

[0035] The storage unit 12 stores one or more programs PG including instructions that can be executed in the processing unit 13, data temporarily stored by the processing unit 13 during processing, data used for processing by the processing unit 13, data obtained as a result of processing by the processing unit 13, etc. The storage unit 12 may include, for example, a main storage device (RAM, ROM, etc.) and an auxiliary storage device (flash memory, SSD, hard disk, memory card, optical disk), etc. The storage unit 12 may be composed of one storage device or a plurality of storage devices. When the storage unit 12 is composed of a plurality of storage devices, each storage device is connected to the processing unit 13 via a computer bus or any other communication method.

[0036] The processing unit 13 comprehensively manages the overall operation of the equipment evaluation device 1 and performs predetermined information processing. The processing unit 13 includes, for example, one or more processors (CPU (central processing unit), MPU (micro-processing unit), DSP (digital signal processor), etc.) that execute processing according to instructions of one or more programs PG stored in the storage unit 12. The processing unit 13 operates as a computer by causing one or more processors to execute instructions of one or more programs PG stored in the storage unit 12.

[0037] The processing unit 13 may include one or more dedicated hardware (ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), FPGA (field-programmable gate array), etc.) configured to implement a specific function. In this case, the processing unit 13 may execute all the processing described in this embodiment on a computer, or may execute at least a part of the processing on the dedicated hardware.

[0038] One or more program PGs may be stored in, for example, a computer-readable recording medium (a disc, a memory card, a USB memory, or other non-temporary tangible medium). The processing unit 13 may read at least a portion of the one or more program PGs stored in such a recording medium through a recording medium reading device (a disc device, etc.) or an interface device (a USB interface, etc.) not shown and write the read data to the storage unit 12. Alternatively, the processing unit 13 may download at least a portion of the one or more program PGs from other devices connected to the communication network 9 through the communication unit 11 and write the read data to the storage unit 12. The one or more program PGs include instructions for executing at least a portion of the device evaluation processing described later in the processing unit 13.

[0039] The database group 2 includes one or more databases for storing various information used in the processing of the equipment evaluation device 1. The equipment evaluation device 1 and the database group 2 can communicate via any communication line (LAN, dedicated line network, Internet, etc.). Figure 1 In the example of , the database group 2 includes an equipment management database 21, an equipment business database 22, a parts database 23, a business record database 24, and an equipment evaluation database 25. For example, the database group 2 has one or more computers constituting these databases, and uses the computer's storage device to store information of each database. In addition, the equipment evaluation device 1 and the database group 2 can be composed of a shared computer. In the following description, the database is sometimes abbreviated as "DB".

[0040] [Device management DB21]

[0041] The device management DB 21 stores device management information about devices in a specific building in a retrievable manner. One piece of device management information includes information about one device. Figure 2A As shown, the device management information includes at least part of the following information.

[0042] ■Identification information for each device (device ID)

[0043] ■Device type information indicating the device type

[0044] Examples of equipment types include lifting equipment, electrical equipment, air conditioning equipment, water supply and drainage equipment, gas equipment, dust removal equipment, fire extinguishing / smoke exhaust equipment, and lightning rod equipment.

[0045] ■Device content information indicating device content

[0046] The device content information includes information such as the name of the device, manufacturer name, model, specifications, etc.

[0047] ■Equipment introduction date

[0048] The equipment introduction date indicates, for example, the date on which equipment is newly introduced or the date on which equipment is replaced with a new one.

[0049] ■ Costs required to introduce or replace equipment

[0050] ■Information about the components that make up the equipment

[0051] The information about the components constituting the device includes, for example, the component ID ( Figure 3A ).

[0052] ■Equipment life

[0053] Equipment life indicates the approximate period during which equipment can be used normally. The date after the period corresponding to the equipment life has passed since the equipment was introduced is the approximate date for equipment replacement. Equipment life is set based on, for example, information on standard life provided by the manufacturer or the average life of the same type of equipment actually in use.

[0054] ■Information about maintenance and management business

[0055] The information on the maintenance management task is information on the task (maintenance management task) performed to maintain the equipment, and includes, for example, a task ID ( Figure 2B ).

[0056] [Equipment business DB22]

[0057] The equipment service DB 22 stores maintenance management service information about equipment maintenance management services in a retrievable manner. A maintenance management service information includes information about a maintenance management service. For example, Figure 2B As shown, the maintenance management task information includes at least a portion of the following information.

[0058] ■Identification information for each maintenance and management task (task ID)

[0059] ■Business type information indicating the type of maintenance and management business

[0060] Examples of maintenance management tasks include inspection tasks, parts replacement tasks, and repair tasks for specific equipment (equipment of a specific type, equipment of a specific model, etc.).

[0061] ■Business content information indicating the content of maintenance and management business

[0062] The service content information includes, for example, the service name, information on the service flow, and information (component ID) of a component that is a target of the inspection service or the component replacement service.

[0063] ■Standard costs for maintenance and management work

[0064] Standard costs required for implementing maintenance management work include, for example, standard operating costs for inspection or adjustment work, standard operating costs for parts replacement work and the cost of parts used for replacement, standard operating costs for repair work and the cost of materials used for repair, etc.

[0065] [Parts DB23]

[0066] The component DB 23 stores component information about components constituting the equipment (particularly replaceable components in maintenance management services) in a retrievable manner. One piece of component information includes information about one component. For example, Figure 3A As shown, the component information includes at least part of the following information.

[0067] ■ Identification information for each component (component ID)

[0068] ■Part type information indicating the part type

[0069] Examples of component types include classification of mechanical components in the case of mechanical components, classification of circuit components in the case of electrical circuit components, information about the device using the component (device type, device model), and information about the location of the device using the component.

[0070] ■Parts content information showing the contents of the parts

[0071] The component content information includes information such as the component name, manufacturer name, model number, specifications, and the like.

[0072] ■Component life

[0073] The component life indicates the approximate period during which a component can be used normally. The component life is set based on, for example, information on the standard life provided by the manufacturer or the average life of components of the same model actually used.

[0074] ■Parts price

[0075] The component price indicates, for example, a standard unit price of a component.

[0076] ■Availability information indicating whether a part is available

[0077] The availability information indicates whether the component is unavailable due to a stop in production of the component by the manufacturer or a depletion of the stock of the component.

[0078] [Business record DB24]

[0079] The business record DB 24 stores business record information about the records of maintenance management services implemented for specific equipment in a retrievable manner. One business record information includes the content and implementation results of the maintenance management service implemented when a maintenance management service is implemented for a piece of equipment in a specific building. For example, Figure 3B As shown, the business record information includes at least part of the following information.

[0080] ■Identification information of equipment for which maintenance and management work is performed (equipment ID)

[0081] ■Information about the content of the business being carried out

[0082] The information about the implemented service content includes, for example, the service ID registered in the equipment service DB 22. When a service not registered in the equipment service DB 22 is implemented, the information about the service content may include the maintenance management service information ( Figure 2B )’s business content information.

[0083] ■Information on the date of implementation of maintenance and management work

[0084] The information on the date when the maintenance management work is performed may include, for example, the year, month, and day when the maintenance management work is performed, or may include only the year and month information or the year information. Hereinafter, the "information on the date when the maintenance management work is performed" may be referred to as "first information".

[0085] ■Information on the results of maintenance and management work

[0086] The information on the results of the maintenance management service includes information on the status of the device updated by the maintenance management service. Hereinafter, the "information on the status of the device updated by the maintenance management service" is sometimes referred to as "second information". For example, the second information may include the following information.

[0087] <When inspecting business>

[0088] Deterioration degree information indicating the degree of deterioration of the equipment confirmed by inspection (measurement value obtained by a measuring instrument, numerical value indicated by an instrument of the equipment, number of inspection objects confirmed by visual inspection, etc.)

[0089] <Parts replacement service>

[0090] Replacement parts information about the replaced parts (part model, quantity, etc.)

[0091] <When performing adjustment work on equipment included in the facility>

[0092] Deterioration degree information indicating the degree of deterioration of the equipment confirmed by adjusting the device included in the equipment (machine adjustment values ​​obtained by measuring instruments and equipment instruments, the number of adjustment objects confirmed by visual inspection, etc.)

[0093] <Repair work>

[0094] Repair information about the repair content (such as the value of the status of the equipment updated by the repair)

[0095] ■ Costs required to implement maintenance and management work

[0096] The costs required to implement maintenance management services include, for example, the operating costs of inspection services or adjustment services, the operating costs of parts replacement services and the costs of parts used for replacement, the operating costs of repair services and the costs of materials used for repair, etc. In addition, when the costs required to implement maintenance management services are compared with the maintenance management service information ( Figure 2B ) in the “standard expenses required to implement maintenance and management services” are the same, it can be omitted.

[0097] [Device evaluation DB25]

[0098] The device evaluation DB 25 stores evaluation criteria information about the evaluation criteria of the value of a device in a retrievable manner. One piece of evaluation criteria information includes information about the evaluation criteria of one device. For example, Figure 3C As shown, the evaluation standard information includes the following information.

[0099] ■Identification information of the device to be evaluated (device ID)

[0100] ■Value determination rules

[0101] The value determination rules are based on the business record information ( Figure 3B ) etc. The value determination rule may be a function that derives the evaluation value based on given parameters (such as information included in the business record information).

[0102] For example, the value determination rule may be to determine an evaluation value representing the value of a piece of equipment based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for a piece of equipment (the elapsed period since the last implementation of the maintenance management service), the number of implementations, and the frequency of implementation. In this case, specifically, for maintenance management services (parts replacement services, machine adjustment services, repair services, etc.) that should be implemented to maintain the normal operation of the equipment, when the elapsed period after implementation is longer than the standard, or the number of implementations is less than the standard, or the frequency of implementation is lower than the standard, the value determination rule determines that the value of the equipment is lower than the standard evaluation value.

[0103] The user terminal device 3 is a device having an information communication function, such as a personal computer, a tablet computer, a smart phone, etc., and is operated by a user who requests an evaluation of the value of a device in a specific building. The user terminal device 3 has, for example, a processing unit, a storage unit, and a communication unit that are the same as the communication unit 11, the storage unit 12, and the processing unit 13 of the device evaluation device 1, and also has an input unit (an input device such as a touch panel, a mouse, and a keyboard) for inputting user instructions to the processing unit, and a display unit (a display device such as a liquid crystal display) for displaying the evaluation results of the device evaluation device 1.

[0104] Here, we will refer to Figure 4 The flowchart of FIG. 1 is for explaining the facility evaluation process performed in the facility evaluation device 1 having the above-described configuration.

[0105] ST100:

[0106] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 acquires equipment management information of one equipment included in a specific building from the equipment management DB 21 in response to a request from the user terminal 3 .

[0107] ST105:

[0108] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 acquires evaluation standard information of one equipment from the equipment evaluation DB 25 based on the equipment ID included in the equipment management information acquired from the equipment management DB 21 .

[0109] ST110:

[0110] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains information for determining the evaluation value of a device (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "value determination parameter") from the business record information of the device stored in the business record DB 24 based on the value determination rule of the evaluation standard information obtained in step ST105.

[0111] In the value determination rule, information in the business record information for determining the evaluation value (value determination parameter) is defined for at least a part of the maintenance management business. The processing unit 13 obtains the value determination parameter defined for each maintenance management business in the value determination rule of one device from the business record information of the one device stored in the business record DB 24.

[0112] For example, suppose that the value determination parameter defined for a maintenance management service of a device is "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management service" (first information). In this case, the processing unit 13 of the device evaluation device 1 obtains the service record information ( Figure 3B ) obtains "information on the implementation date of maintenance management business" (first information) as a parameter for value determination.

[0113] ST115:

[0114] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains an evaluation value indicating the value of one equipment by applying the information (value determination parameters) obtained from the work record information for each maintenance management work in step ST110 to the value determination rule of the evaluation standard information obtained in step ST105.

[0115] For example, it is assumed that the value determination rule determines the evaluation value representing the value of one device based on at least one of the "period after implementation" (the period of time since the last implementation of the maintenance management service), "the number of implementations" and "the frequency of implementation" of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for one device. In this case, the processing unit 13 of the device evaluation device 1 obtains the evaluation value representing the value of the one device from the service record information ( Figure 3B) obtains "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business" (first information) as a parameter for value determination (ST105). And, the processing unit 13 obtains an evaluation value representing the value of the equipment according to the value determination rule based on at least one of the "elapsed period after implementation", "number of implementations" and "implementation frequency" derived from the "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business" (first information) obtained for the at least one maintenance management business. Specifically, when the "elapsed period after implementation" is longer than the standard, or when the "number of implementations" is less than the standard, or when the "implementation frequency" is lower than the standard, the processing unit 13 obtains an evaluation value indicating that the value of the equipment is lower than the standard according to the value determination rule.

[0116] ST120:

[0117] When the evaluation value for one device is obtained in steps ST100 to ST115 , if there is another device for which the evaluation value needs to be obtained, the processing unit 13 of the device evaluation apparatus 1 repeatedly executes the processing of steps ST100 to ST115 for the device and obtains the evaluation value.

[0118] ST125:

[0119] When the evaluation values ​​are obtained for all the equipment in a specific building, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains a comprehensive evaluation value representing the value of all the equipment in the specific building based on the obtained evaluation values. For example, the processing unit 13 may obtain the sum or average of the evaluation values ​​of all the equipment as the comprehensive evaluation value. Alternatively, the processing unit 13 may multiply the evaluation values ​​for all the equipment by the equipment introduction cost ( Figure 2A ) is obtained by adding a weighted evaluation value proportional to the weighting coefficient, and the sum or average thereof is taken as the comprehensive evaluation value. In the latter case, it is easy to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value close to the economic value of the equipment.

[0120] ST130:

[0121] When the processing unit 13 of the device evaluation device 1 obtains the evaluation value of each device and the comprehensive evaluation value of all devices, these evaluation results are transmitted to the user terminal device 3 and displayed on the screen of the user terminal device 3. Figure 5 FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a screen of the user terminal device 3 displaying the evaluation result of the value of the equipment. Figure 5 In the screen A shown in , a bar graph of the evaluation value obtained for each equipment (lifting equipment, electrical equipment, water supply and drainage equipment, air conditioning equipment, gas equipment, fire extinguishing / smoke exhaust equipment) and the comprehensive evaluation value of all equipment are displayed.

[0122] As described above, according to the present embodiment, for each of one or more devices in a specific building, the business record information ( Figure 3B ) is applied to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information to obtain an evaluation value representing the value of the equipment. Therefore, the value of the equipment of the building, which may change according to the actual performance of the maintenance management work performed in the past, can be appropriately evaluated.

[0123] In addition, according to this embodiment, based on the business record information ( Figure 3B ) is derived from the "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business" (first information) included in the value evaluation information, and at least one of the "elapsed period after implementation", "number of implementations" and "implementation frequency" of the maintenance management business is obtained according to the value determination rule of the value evaluation information. Therefore, an appropriate evaluation value can be obtained according to the time interval, number of times and frequency of implementing the maintenance management business.

[0124] Next, some modified examples of the equipment evaluation device 1 according to the present embodiment will be described.

[0125] (Variant 1)

[0126] In the above-mentioned embodiment, the business record information is obtained from the business record information ( Figure 3B ) as a parameter for value determination, and the evaluation value of the equipment is obtained by applying the parameter for value determination to the value determination rule, but the present embodiment is not limited to this example. For example, the value determination rule for at least part of the equipment may be to use the business record information ( Figure 3B ) contained in the “information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business” (first information) and the “information on the status of the equipment updated by implementing the maintenance management business” (second information) are respectively used as rules for determining the value parameters.

[0127] At this time, for example, the value determination rule may determine the evaluation value of the one device based on at least one of the "period of time since implementation", "number of implementations" and "implementation frequency" of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the one device and the state of the one device updated by the at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the one device. The value determination rule determines, for example, that the higher the degree of deterioration of the device indicated in the "information on the state of the device updated by implementing the maintenance management service" (second information), the lower the evaluation value of the device.

[0128] For the value determination rule, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 converts the business record information ( Figure 3B) are applied as parameters for determining the value to obtain the evaluation value for the one device (ST115: Figure 4 ). For example, the processing unit 13 obtains an evaluation value according to the value determination rule that the higher the degree of deterioration of the equipment indicated in the "information on the state of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management work" (second information), the lower the value of the equipment.

[0129] According to the present modification, the evaluation value of the equipment is acquired in consideration of "information on the state of the equipment updated by performing maintenance management work" (second information), so that an appropriate evaluation value can be easily obtained according to the state of the equipment.

[0130] (Variant 2)

[0131] The value of a device varies depending on the usable period of the device. That is, even for the same device, the longer the usable period, the higher the value, and the shorter the usable period, the lower the value. Therefore, at least part of the device value determination rules may be rules for determining the value of the device based on the usable period of the device.

[0132] At this time, for example, at least a part of the value determination rules of the equipment includes two rules (a first rule and a second rule).

[0133] The first rule determines and estimates the usable period during which the device is usable based on at least one of the "period elapsed after implementation", "number of implementations" and "implementation frequency" of at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device and the status of the device updated by at least one maintenance management service that can be implemented for the device.

[0134] For example, the first rule includes the following provisions: Based on the "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management service" (first information), when the "period elapsed after implementation" of the maintenance management service is longer than the standard, or the "number of implementations" is less than the standard, or the "frequency of implementation" is lower than the standard, the usable period of the equipment is shorter than the standard.

[0135] In addition, the first rule includes the following provision: the usable period of the equipment is determined based on the "information on the state of the equipment updated by the implementation of the maintenance management service" (second information). For example, the first rule includes the following provision: the usable period of the equipment is determined based on "deterioration degree information", "repair information", "replacement component information" and the like as the "information on the state of the equipment updated by the implementation of the maintenance management service" (second information).

[0136] Specifically, the first rule may include the following provision: according to the "deterioration degree information" (second information) indicating the degree of degradation of the device determined by the inspection service or the adjustment service, the higher the degree of degradation of the device, the shorter the usable period.

[0137] In addition, the first rule may include the following provisions: based on the "repair information" (second information) about the content of repairs performed on the equipment through the repair service, the usable period is shorter the fewer the number of repairs, or the more days that have passed since the last repair, the shorter the usable period.

[0138] In addition, the first rule may include the following provisions: based on the "replacement part information" (second information) about the parts of the equipment replaced through the part replacement service, the fewer times the parts are replaced, the shorter the usable period, or the more days that have passed since the last replacement of the parts, the shorter the usable period.

[0139] The second rule determines the evaluation value of one device based on the usable period determined by the first rule for the one device. That is, the second rule determines an evaluation value such that the longer the usable period, the higher the value of the device.

[0140] For example, the second rule may include the following provisions: Based on the usable period determined for a device, an evaluation value is determined according to the ratio of the determined useful life to the average device life of the device (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "usable period ratio"). At this time, the second rule may determine that the greater the usable period ratio relative to the average device life, the higher the value of the device. Specifically, the second rule may determine an evaluation value that is proportional to the usable period ratio. According to such a second rule, the size of the usable period ratio can be used as a reference to compare the evaluation values ​​of multiple devices with different average device lives.

[0141] Figure 6 This is used to explain the process of obtaining the evaluation value of the device in this modification (ST115: Figure 4 ) is a flowchart of an example. The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 executes when obtaining the evaluation value of at least a part of the equipment in the building. Figure 6 Processing shown.

[0142] ST200:

[0143] First, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 generates a value determination rule in step ST110 ( Figure 4 ) to obtain the business record information of the device ( Figure 3B ) to extract information (value determination parameters) for determining the usable period of the equipment. For example, the processing unit 13 extracts business record information ( Figure 3B ) includes “information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business” (first information) and “information on the status of the equipment updated by implementing the maintenance management business” (second information).

[0144] ST205:

[0145] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation apparatus 1 obtains the business record information ( Figure 3B ) is applied to the first rule of the one device to obtain the usable period of the one device.

[0146] For example, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains the evaluation value of the equipment according to the first rule based on at least one of the "elapsed period after implementation", "number of implementations" and "implementation frequency" derived from the "information on the implementation date of the maintenance management business" (first information) extracted in step ST200. Specifically, when the "elapsed period after implementation" is longer than the standard, or when the "number of implementations" is less than the standard, or when the "implementation frequency" is lower than the standard, the processing unit 13 obtains a usable period shorter than the standard according to the value determination rule.

[0147] Furthermore, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 acquires the usable period of the equipment by applying the “information on the state of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management work” (second information) extracted in step ST200 to the first rule.

[0148] For example, the processing unit 13 can apply the "degradation degree information" (second information) extracted in step ST200 to the first rule to obtain a usable period that is shorter as the degree of degradation of the device increases.

[0149] Furthermore, the processing unit 13 can obtain a usable period that is shorter as the number of repairs decreases, or a usable period that is shorter as the number of days elapsed since the last repair increases, by applying the "repair information" (second information) extracted in step ST200 to the first rule.

[0150] In addition, the processing unit 13 can apply the "replacement component information" (second information) extracted in step ST200 to the first rule to obtain a usable period that is shorter the fewer times the component is replaced, or a usable period that is shorter the longer the number of days that have passed since the last replacement of the component.

[0151] ST240:

[0152] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 acquires the evaluation value for the one equipment by applying the usable period acquired for the one equipment in step ST205 to the second rule for the one equipment included in the evaluation standard information.

[0153] For example, it is assumed that the second rule includes a provision for determining the evaluation value based on the usable period ratio. In this case, the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 calculates the evaluation value based on the usable period obtained for one equipment in step ST205 and the equipment management information ( Figure 2A ) is applied to the second rule for the one device and the evaluation value of the one device is obtained based on the usable period ratio.

[0154] According to this variation, by Figure 3B ) is applied to the first rule to obtain the usable period of the device, and the evaluation value of the device is obtained based on the usable period by applying the usable period to the second rule. Therefore, it is easier to obtain an evaluation value that appropriately reflects the usable period of the device.

[0155] According to this modification, the evaluation value is obtained by the second rule of determining the evaluation value based on the usable period ratio. This allows the evaluation values ​​of a plurality of devices with different device lifespans to be compared based on the size of the usable period ratio.

[0156] (Third Modification)

[0157] In order to make the evaluation value of the equipment close to the economic (monetary) value of the equipment, it is necessary to include a provision for determining the evaluation value based on the cost of the equipment (the cost required for the introduction or replacement of the equipment) in the value determination rule. Therefore, in this variation, the second rule for determining the evaluation value based on the usable period includes a provision for determining the evaluation value based on the equipment introduction cost (the cost required for the introduction of the equipment). That is, the second rule includes the following provision: based on the usable period determined for one equipment, the evaluation value is determined based on the usable period ratio relative to the average equipment life of the one equipment and the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the one equipment.

[0158] For example, the second rule may determine an evaluation value that increases in value of equipment when the usable period ratio relative to the average equipment life becomes larger or the equipment introduction cost increases. Specifically, an evaluation value proportional to the usable period ratio and the equipment introduction cost may be determined.

[0159] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 processes the equipment management information ( Figure 2A) is applied to the second rule of the one device, and the device management information ( Figure 2A ) is applied to the equipment introduction cost of the one equipment included in the second rule. Based on this, the processing unit 13 obtains the evaluation value of the one equipment based on the usable period ratio and the equipment introduction cost.

[0160] According to this modification, since the evaluation value is obtained based on the facility introduction cost, the evaluation value of the facility can be brought close to the economic (monetary) value of the facility.

[0161] (Fourth Modification)

[0162] In the third variant, the second rule includes the following provisions: The second rule for determining the evaluation value based on the usable period determines the evaluation value based on the equipment introduction cost. However, the cost of the equipment includes not only the cost of introduction, but also the cost of maintenance and management business after introduction. Therefore, in this variant, the second rule for determining the evaluation value based on the usable period, in addition to the rule for determining the evaluation value based on the equipment introduction cost, also includes a provision for determining the evaluation value based on the maintenance and management costs required for the maintenance and management of the equipment. That is, the second rule includes the following provisions: Based on the usable period determined for a device, the evaluation value is determined according to the ratio of the usable period relative to the average equipment life of the device, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the device, and the maintenance and management costs required for the maintenance and management of the device.

[0163] For example, the second rule may determine an evaluation value that increases in the value of equipment when the ratio of the usable period to the average equipment life becomes larger or the equipment introduction cost increases or the maintenance management cost increases. Specifically, an evaluation value that is proportional to the usable period ratio and proportional to the sum of the equipment introduction cost and the maintenance management cost may be determined.

[0164] By using such a second rule, the evaluation value is determined based on the equipment introduction cost and the maintenance and management cost, so that the value represented by the evaluation value can be made close to the economic value of the equipment.

[0165] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 processes the equipment management information ( Figure 2A ) is applied to the second rule of the one device, and the device management information ( Figure 2A ) includes the equipment introduction cost and business record information of the equipment ( Figure 3B ) or maintain business information ( Figure 2B) is applied to the maintenance and management costs of the one equipment included in the second rule. Based on this, the processing unit 13 obtains the evaluation value of the one equipment based on the usable period ratio, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance and management cost.

[0166] According to this modification, the evaluation value is obtained based on the facility introduction cost and the maintenance management cost, so the evaluation value of the facility can be brought close to the economic (monetary) value of the facility.

[0167] (Fifth Modification)

[0168] When a part replacement service such as consumable parts is implemented as a maintenance management service for equipment, if the parts are not available due to the manufacturer's production suspension or the depletion of the stock parts, the part replacement service cannot be performed, and the entire equipment may need to be replaced. Therefore, in this variant, the first rule for determining the usable period includes the following provisions: Based on the part information ( Figure 3A ) contains the availability information to set the upper limit of the usable period of the equipment. That is, the first rule includes the following provisions: when there is a component in the component information ( Figure 3A ) indicates that the component is unavailable, based on the component information ( Figure 3A ) contains the average component life and business record information of the component ( Figure 3B The upper limit of the usable period of the equipment is determined by the start date of use of the part contained in the Item (the date of implementation of the last part replacement service).

[0169] Figure 7 This is used to explain the process of obtaining the evaluation value of the device in this modification (ST115: Figure 4 ) is a flowchart of an example. When the processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains the evaluation value of at least a part of the equipment in the building, Figure 7 Processing shown. Figure 7 The flowchart shown is in Figure 6 The flowchart shown in FIG. 1 is obtained by adding steps ST215 to ST230, and the other steps are the same as those in FIG. Figure 6 Here, the same flowchart as shown in Figure 6 The different processes (ST215 to ST230) from the flowchart shown will be described.

[0170] ST215:

[0171] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 retrieves the business record information ( Figure 3B) retrieves a part replacement service for performing part replacement from the maintenance management services that can be implemented by a device. In addition, the processing unit 13 obtains information (such as part ID) of the replacement object part from the service record information of the part replacement service found through the search. And, the processing unit 13 obtains information (such as part ID) of the replacement object part from the part information ( Figure 3A ) to obtain the availability information of the replacement object component, and determine whether the availability information indicates that the component is unavailable. When the processing unit 13 determines that all components are available (No in ST215), it migrates to the described step ST240. When it is determined that there are unavailable components (Yes in ST215), it migrates to step ST220.

[0172] ST220:

[0173] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 obtains the component information ( Figure 3A ) to obtain the average component life of the component determined to be unavailable in step ST215, and from the business record information ( Figure 3B ) to obtain the start date of use of the component (the date of implementation of the last component replacement service). The processing unit 13 sets the upper limit of the usable period of the equipment based on the component life of the unavailable component and the start date of use. For example, the processing unit 13 sets the day (which may also be a month or a year) after a period corresponding to the component life has passed since the start date of use as the upper limit of the usable period.

[0174] ST225:

[0175] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 determines whether the usable period obtained in step ST205 exceeds at least one upper limit of the usable period set in step ST220. When the usable period obtained in step ST205 does not exceed any upper limit (No in ST225), the processing unit 13 moves to the described step ST240, and when the usable period obtained in step ST205 exceeds at least one upper limit, the processing unit 13 moves to step ST230.

[0176] ST230:

[0177] The processing unit 13 of the equipment evaluation device 1 adjusts the usable period obtained in step ST205 so as not to exceed any upper limit set in step ST220. For example, the processing unit 13 adjusts the usable period so that the last day (or month or year) of the usable period is the same as the day (or month or year) of the upper limit closest to the current time set in step ST220.

[0178] According to this modification, the usable period of the equipment is adjusted according to the availability of the parts replaced in the parts replacement work, so that the evaluation value of the equipment can be obtained more appropriately compared with the case where the availability of the parts is not considered.

[0179] In addition, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes various modifications.

[0180] For example, the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information may be information that specifies the content of the process of obtaining the evaluation value from the given value determination parameter, and at least a part of the information may be information indicating that a training model pre-generated by a predetermined machine learning algorithm is used for the execution of the process (identification information of the training model applied to the execution of the process, etc.). In this case, the training model may be stored in a storage device constituting the storage unit 12, or may be stored in another storage device accessible by the processing unit 13.

[0181] exist Figure 1 In the example, the evaluation result of the device by the device evaluation device 1 is displayed on the screen of the user terminal device 3, but the user can also directly operate the device evaluation device 1. In this case, the evaluation result of the device can be displayed on the screen of the display unit provided in the device evaluation device 1.

[0182] The following are appendices [1] to

[17] related to this embodiment.

[0183] [1] A method performed by a device evaluation apparatus for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein:

[0184] The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device,

[0185] One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment,

[0186] The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented.

[0187] The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices,

[0188] at least a portion of the service record information includes second information on the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service,

[0189] At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device,

[0190] The equipment evaluation device includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments in the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information.

[0191] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0192] For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and

[0193] The evaluation value is acquired by applying the acquired usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices.

[0194] [2] The method according to [1], wherein:

[0195] One or more of the storage devices stores component information about components of the device that can be replaced through a component replacement service,

[0196] The component information includes availability information indicating whether the component is available.

[0197] At least part of said first rule comprises the following provisions:

[0198] When the component indicated as unavailable is present in the availability information, determining an upper limit of the usable period based on an average component life of the component and a start time of use of the component,

[0199] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0200] For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, when there is a component that is indicated as unavailable by the availability information included in the component information, the usable period that is shorter than the upper limit is obtained based on the average component life of the component and the start time of use of the component.

[0201] [3] The method according to [1], wherein:

[0202] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0203] Based on the usable period determined for one of the devices, determining the evaluation value according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average device life of the device,

[0204] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0205] The evaluation value is obtained based on a ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment included in the specific building.

[0206] [4] The method according to [1], wherein:

[0207] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0208] determining the evaluation value based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average equipment life of the one of the equipment and equipment introduction costs required for introduction of the one of the equipment,

[0209] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0210] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment and the equipment introduction cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0211] [5] The method according to [1], wherein:

[0212] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0213] The evaluation value is determined based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the one of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the one of the equipment, and the maintenance management cost required for the maintenance management of the one of the equipment,

[0214] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0215] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance management cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0216] [6] The method according to any one of [1] to [5], wherein

[0217] At least a part of the second information is one of deterioration degree information indicating the deterioration degree of the equipment determined by the inspection service, repair information on the content of the repair performed on the equipment by the repair service, and replacement part information on the parts of the equipment replaced by the parts replacement service,

[0218] At least a portion of said first rule comprises at least one of the following provisions:

[0219] According to the degradation degree information, the higher the degradation degree is, the shorter the usable period is;

[0220] According to the repair information, the smaller the number of repairs and / or the greater the number of days that have passed since the last repair, the shorter the usable period;

[0221] According to the replacement component information, the less the number of times the component is replaced and / or the more days have passed since the last replacement of the component, the shorter the usable period is.

[0222] The first process comprises at least one of the following steps:

[0223] For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained in which the shorter the higher the degree of deterioration is, by applying the deterioration degree information included in the business record information and the first information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information;

[0224] For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, by applying the repair information included in the business record information and the first information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information, the usable period is obtained, which is shorter as the number of repairs is smaller and / or the number of days that have passed since the last repair is greater; and

[0225] For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the replacement component information contained in the business record information and the first information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information, thereby obtaining a shorter usable period the fewer times the component is replaced and / or the more days have passed since the last replacement of the component.

[0226] [7] The method according to any one of [1] to [5], wherein

[0227] The method includes a second step of acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value indicating the value of all the equipment included in the specific building based on the evaluation value acquired for each of the one or more equipment included in the specific building.

[0228] [8] A device for evaluating the value of equipment in a building, wherein:

[0229] The equipment evaluation device comprises:

[0230] Processing Department; and

[0231] a storage unit storing instructions executed by the processing unit,

[0232] The processing unit can access one or more storage devices.

[0233] The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device,

[0234] One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment,

[0235] The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented.

[0236] The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices,

[0237] At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service,

[0238] At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device,

[0239] The processing performed by the processing unit according to the instruction includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more devices of the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information,

[0240] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0241] For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and

[0242] The evaluation value is acquired by applying the acquired usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices.

[0243] [9] The device evaluation apparatus according to [8], wherein:

[0244] One or more of the storage devices stores component information about components of the device that can be replaced through a component replacement service,

[0245] The component information includes availability information indicating whether the component is available.

[0246] At least part of said first rule comprises the following provisions:

[0247] When the component indicated as unavailable is present in the availability information, determining an upper limit of the usable period based on an average component life of the component and a start time of use of the component,

[0248] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0249] For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, when there is a component that is indicated as unavailable by the availability information included in the component information, the usable period that is shorter than the upper limit is obtained based on the average component life of the component and the start time of use of the component.

[0250]

[10] The device evaluation apparatus according to [8], wherein:

[0251] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0252] Based on the usable period determined for one of the devices, determining the evaluation value according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average device life of the device,

[0253] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0254] The evaluation value is obtained based on a ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment included in the specific building.

[0255]

[11] The device evaluation apparatus according to [8], wherein:

[0256] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0257] determining the evaluation value based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average equipment life of the one of the equipment and equipment introduction costs required for introduction of the one of the equipment,

[0258] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0259] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment and the equipment introduction cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0260]

[12] The device evaluation apparatus according to [8], wherein:

[0261] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0262] The evaluation value is determined based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the one of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the one of the equipment, and the maintenance management cost required for the maintenance management of the one of the equipment,

[0263] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0264] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance management cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0265]

[13] A computer-readable recording medium having a program recorded thereon, the program including instructions executable by a device evaluation device for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein:

[0266] The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device,

[0267] One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment,

[0268] The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented.

[0269] The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices,

[0270] At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service,

[0271] At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device,

[0272] The processing performed by the equipment evaluation device according to the instructions of the program includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments possessed by the specific building by applying the first information contained in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule contained in the evaluation standard information,

[0273] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0274] For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and

[0275] The evaluation value is acquired by applying the acquired usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices.

[0276]

[14] The computer-readable recording medium according to

[13] , wherein:

[0277] One or more of the storage devices stores component information about components of the device that can be replaced through a component replacement service,

[0278] The component information includes availability information indicating whether the component is available.

[0279] At least part of said first rule comprises the following provisions:

[0280] When the component indicated as unavailable is present in the availability information, determining an upper limit of the usable period based on an average component life of the component and a start time of use of the component,

[0281] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0282] For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, when there is a component that is indicated as unavailable by the availability information included in the component information, the usable period that is shorter than the upper limit is obtained based on the average component life of the component and the start time of use of the component.

[0283]

[15] The computer-readable recording medium according to

[13] , wherein:

[0284] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0285] Based on the usable period determined for one of the devices, determining the evaluation value according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average device life of the device,

[0286] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0287] The evaluation value is obtained based on a ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment included in the specific building.

[0288]

[16] The computer-readable recording medium according to

[13] , wherein

[0289] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0290] determining the evaluation value based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average equipment life of the one of the equipment and equipment introduction costs required for introduction of the one of the equipment,

[0291] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0292] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment and the equipment introduction cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0293]

[17] The computer-readable recording medium according to

[13] , wherein

[0294] At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions:

[0295] The evaluation value is determined based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the one of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the one of the equipment, and the maintenance management cost required for the maintenance management of the one of the equipment,

[0296] The first process comprises the following steps:

[0297] The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance management cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

[0298] This application claims the benefit of priority based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-122921 filed on August 1, 2022, and incorporates the entire contents of Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-122921 by reference.

[0299] (Explanation of Reference Numerals)

[0300] 1: Equipment evaluation device 11: Communication unit

[0301] 12: Storage unit 13: Processing unit

[0302] 2: Database Group 21: Device Management DB

[0303] 22: Equipment business DB 23: Component DB

[0304] 24: Business record DB 25: Equipment evaluation DB

[0305] 3: User terminal device 9: Communication network

Claims

1. A method performed by an equipment evaluation device for evaluating the value of equipment possessed by a building, wherein: The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The equipment evaluation device includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments in the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information. The first process comprises the following steps: For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and the evaluation value is obtained by applying the obtained usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices; One or more of the storage devices stores component information about components of the device that can be replaced through a component replacement service, The component information includes availability information indicating whether the component is available. At least part of said first rule comprises the following provisions: When the component indicated as unavailable is present in the availability information, determining an upper limit of the usable period based on an average component life of the component and a start time of use of the component, The first process comprises the following steps: For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, when there is a component that is indicated as unavailable by the availability information included in the component information, the usable period that is shorter than the upper limit is obtained based on the average component life of the component and the start time of use of the component.

2. A method performed by a device evaluation apparatus for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein: The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The equipment evaluation device includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments in the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information. The first process comprises the following steps: For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and the evaluation value is obtained by applying the obtained usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices; At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions: Based on the usable period determined for one of the devices, determining the evaluation value according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average device life of the device, The first process comprises the following steps: The evaluation value is obtained based on a ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment included in the specific building.

3. A method performed by a device evaluation apparatus for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein: The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The equipment evaluation device includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments in the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information. The first process comprises the following steps: For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and the evaluation value is obtained by applying the obtained usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices; At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions: determining the evaluation value based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to a ratio of the determined usable period to an average equipment life of the one of the equipment and equipment introduction costs required for introduction of the one of the equipment, The first process comprises the following steps: The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment and the equipment introduction cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

4. A method performed by a device evaluation apparatus for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein: The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The equipment evaluation device includes a first step of obtaining the evaluation value of each of the one or more equipments in the specific building by applying the first information included in the business record information of one or more maintenance management businesses to the value determination rule included in the evaluation standard information. The first process comprises the following steps: For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the first information and the second information included in the business record information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; and the evaluation value is obtained by applying the obtained usable period to the second rule included in the evaluation standard information for the at least part of the devices; At least part of said second rule comprises the following provisions: The evaluation value is determined based on the usable period determined for one of the equipment, according to the ratio of the determined usable period to the average equipment life of the one of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost required for the introduction of the one of the equipment, and the maintenance management cost required for the maintenance management of the one of the equipment, The first process comprises the following steps: The evaluation value is obtained based on the ratio of the obtained usable period to the life of the equipment, the equipment introduction cost, and the maintenance management cost by applying the second rule to the usable period obtained for at least a part of the equipment possessed by the specific building.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein: At least a part of the second information is one of deterioration degree information indicating the deterioration degree of the equipment determined by the inspection service, repair information on the content of the repair performed on the equipment by the repair service, and replacement part information on the parts of the equipment replaced by the parts replacement service, At least a portion of said first rule comprises at least one of the following provisions: According to the degradation degree information, the higher the degradation degree is, the shorter the usable period is; According to the repair information, the smaller the number of repairs and / or the greater the number of days that have passed since the last repair, the shorter the usable period; and According to the replacement component information, the less the number of times the component is replaced and / or the more days have passed since the last replacement of the component, the shorter the usable period is. The first process comprises at least one of the following steps: For at least a part of the equipment in the specific building, the usable period is obtained in which the shorter the higher the degree of deterioration is, by applying the deterioration degree information included in the business record information and the first information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information; For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, by applying the repair information included in the business record information and the first information to the first rule included in the evaluation standard information, the usable period is obtained, which is shorter as the number of repairs is smaller and / or the number of days that have passed since the last repair is greater; and For at least a portion of the equipment possessed by the specific building, the usable period is obtained by applying the replacement component information contained in the business record information and the first information to the first rule contained in the evaluation standard information, thereby obtaining a shorter usable period the fewer times the component is replaced and / or the more days have passed since the last replacement of the component.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein: The method includes a second step of acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value indicating the value of all the equipment included in the specific building based on the evaluation value acquired for each of the one or more equipment included in the specific building.

7. A device for evaluating the value of equipment in a building, wherein: The equipment evaluation device comprises: Processing Department; and a storage unit storing instructions executed by the processing unit, The processing unit can access one or more storage devices. The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The processing performed by the processing unit according to the instruction includes the first step of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

8. A computer-readable recording medium having a program recorded thereon, the program including instructions executable by a device evaluation device for evaluating the value of a device possessed by a building, wherein: The device evaluation device can access more than one storage device, One or more of the storage devices stores business record information on one or more maintenance management business performed on each of the one or more equipment possessed by the specific building and evaluation standard information on the evaluation standard of the value determined in advance for each of the equipment, The service record information for one of the maintenance management services includes first information on a date when the one of the maintenance management services is implemented. The evaluation standard information for one of the devices includes a value determination rule for determining an evaluation value representing the value of the one of the devices, At least a portion of the service record information includes second information about the status of the equipment updated by performing the maintenance management service, At least a part of the value determination rules includes a first rule and a second rule, wherein the first rule determines and estimates a usable period during which the one device is usable based on at least one of the elapsed period after implementation of at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, the number of implementations, and the implementation frequency, and the state of the one device updated by at least one of the maintenance management services that can be implemented for the one device, and the second rule determines the evaluation value of the one device based on the usable period determined for the one device, The processing performed by the equipment evaluation device according to the instructions of the program includes the first step of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images