Alashanping myza alashanping imago attractant and application thereof
By using the Alxa Pingyan aphid adult attractant configured with volatiles such as benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene, eugenol, etc., the problems of serious contamination, low prevention efficiency and high cost in the prevention and control process in the existing technology have been solved, and the problem of serious contamination, low prevention efficiency and high cost in the prevention and control process has been achieved. Efficient and safe Alashan Pingyan aphid adult trapping effect.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411460777.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-10-18
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-07
AI Technical Summary
In the prior art, there are problems such as serious pollution control of chemicals, low physical control and high cost in the prevention and control process of Alaxan Pingyan aphid fly, and it is difficult to effectively prevent and control Alaxan Pingyan aphid fly adult.
A Alxa Pingyan aphid adult attractant is provided, and its formula includes benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene, eugenol. The volatile configuration screened through the olfactory reaction is used to trap using a combination of a sustained release bottle and a yellow sticky insect plate.
This attractant significantly improves the trapping effect of Alaxan Pingyan aphid adults, with an average 3-day trapping amount reaching 14.18±0.63 heads, and is safe for the environment, has a long sustaining cycle and a high utilization rate.
Smart Images

Figure SMS_1 
Figure SMS_2 
Figure SMS_3
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of forest pest control, and in particular to the technical field of an Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant and application thereof. Background Art
[0002] Eumerus alxaensis Huo&Liu, belonging to the family Syrphidae of the order Diptera, is a stem-boring pest that harms Cistanche deserticola.
[0003] The existing technology only studies the growth and development period of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies. The monitoring and control of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies are mainly based on yellow sticky boards and chemical agents, which are inefficient and easy to cause drug residues. Long-term use leads to the "3R" problem, and the use of chemical control is very likely to affect the medicinal materials. Therefore, based on the reports of the existing technology, how to find an attractant that can avoid the serious pollution of chemical control, low physical control efficiency and high cost in the control of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies adults, and can have a good control effect on Alashan flat-faced aphid flies adults is of great significance to the green and healthy development of the Cistanche deserticola industry. Summary of the invention
[0004] In view of the technical problems that the existing technology for controlling Alashan flat-faced aphid flies uses chemical control with serious pollution, and the physical control has low prevention effect and high cost, the present invention aims to provide an Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant and its application. The attractant, which is configured with volatiles screened by olfactory reaction, has a simple formula, significant killing effect on Alashan flat-faced aphid flies, is safe for natural enemies and the environment, has a long lasting effect period, and has a high utilization rate. When applied in the Cistanche deserticola planting area, the average 3-day trapping amount of Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adults reached 14.18±0.63 heads, which can effectively trap Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adults and has wide practicality in the field of stem borer pest control.
[0005] In order to achieve the above technical effects, the present invention is implemented through the following technical solutions.
[0006] The invention provides an attractant for adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies. The formula of the attractant comprises benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene and eugenol.
[0007] Preferably, the formula of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant comprises, by weight, 3 to 5 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 to 4 parts of caryophyllene, 1 to 3 parts of limonene, and 3 to 5 parts of eugenol.
[0008] More preferably, the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant formula comprises, by weight, 3 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 parts of caryophyllene, 1 part of limonene, and 3 parts of eugenol.
[0009] At the same time, the invention provides an application of an attractant for adults of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly.
[0010] Preferably, the application of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant uses a slow-release bottle as a carrier, adds the configured Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant into the slow-release bottle, and uses a trap formed by combining it with a yellow sticky insect board for trapping.
[0011] Furthermore, the present invention provides an application of an Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas.
[0012] Preferably, the use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas is to hang the traps on branches on the south side of the Haloxylon ammodendron tree at a height of 1 / 3 of the ground, with adjacent traps more than 15 m apart, replace the yellow sticky insect board every 3 days, and replace the attractant every 9 days.
[0013] Through the above technical scheme, the present invention obtains the following technical effects: (1) The present invention provides an attractant for adults of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly, comprising benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene and eugenol. The attractant is a volatile substance of a host plant of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly and is used in conjunction with a yellow sticky insect board. The attractant has the characteristics of good attracting effect and no adverse effect on the environment. (2) The present invention provides an application of an attractant for adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies. Through continuous monitoring for 24 days in the field, it was found that the attraction effect of a single volatile compound was weak, while the attraction effect of a volatile compound prepared with 3 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 parts of caryophyllene, 1 part of limonene, and 3 parts of eugenol was good. The average 3-day trapping amount of adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies reached 14.18±0.63 heads. Through continuous monitoring for 24 days in the field, the average 3-day trapping amount of adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies reached 14.18±0.63 heads. The selection rate of female adults reached 65.00%, the selection rate of male adults reached 70.00%, and the attraction rate was as high as 76.67%. The application of the attractant in the preparation of pest control drugs in Cistanche deserticola planting areas has a significant and outstanding technical effect. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] none DETAILED DESCRIPTION Below, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention will be clearly and completely described in combination with the contents in the embodiment of the present invention. Based on the embodiment of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention. All raw and auxiliary materials, reagents and equipment selected in the present invention are conventionally selected in the field of this technology. The % involved in the present invention is weight percentage unless otherwise specified.
[0015] Example 1: Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant and its application The invention provides an attractant for adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies. The formula of the attractant comprises benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene and eugenol.
[0016] Preferably, the formula of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant comprises, by weight, 3 to 5 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 to 4 parts of caryophyllene, 1 to 3 parts of limonene, and 3 to 5 parts of eugenol.
[0017] More preferably, the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant formula comprises, by weight, 3 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 parts of caryophyllene, 1 part of limonene, and 3 parts of eugenol.
[0018] At the same time, the invention provides an application of an attractant for adults of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly.
[0019] Preferably, the application of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant uses a slow-release bottle as a carrier, adds the configured Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant into the slow-release bottle, and uses a trap formed by combining it with a yellow sticky insect board for trapping.
[0020] Furthermore, the present invention provides an application of an Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas.
[0021] Preferably, the use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas is to hang the traps on branches on the south side of the Haloxylon ammodendron tree at a height of 1 / 3 of the ground, with adjacent traps more than 15 m apart, replace the yellow sticky insect board every 3 days, and replace the attractant every 9 days.
[0022] Example 2: Olfactory response of Alaska's flat-faced aphid fly to volatiles of host plants Selection of volatiles: Four substances in the fleshy stems of Cistanche deserticola, namely eugenol, benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, and 2-methyl-3-octene, and four substances in the inflorescence, namely limonene, hexadecane, hexanal, and 1-chlorododecane, a total of 8 volatiles were selected for the experiment.
[0023] Test insect rearing: Test insects were collected from the Cistanche deserticola planting base in the windbreak and sand control station in Alele Town, Qiemo County, Xinjiang, and the mature larvae were collected and brought back indoors for use. The mature larvae of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly were raised individually in a culture dish, and the male and female were identified after pupation. Ten pairs of adults were raised in each insect cage with a side length of 25 cm. All test insects were raised in an artificial phenological box with conditions of 28°C, 30%RH, and a photoperiod of L / / D=14h / / 10h.
[0024] In the indoor test, 20 Alashan flat-faced aphid flies were tested as a group. One side arm of the Y-shaped olfactometer was filled with host plant volatiles, the other side arm was liquid paraffin (CK), and the main arm was placed with test insects. The absorbent cotton soaked with the volatile substances of Cistanche deserticola to be tested was placed in the trap bottle (the test substance was changed every 2 hours during the test), and the air flow rate in the test arm was 0.4 L·min -1 The airflow passes through activated carbon filtration, washing bottle wetting, flowmeter, trap bottle containing volatiles and three-way pipe connected to the pear-shaped bottle to reach the test insects. Female and male insects are tested separately, and the adults are placed in the central insect chamber of the Y-shaped olfactometer. One adult is placed each time, and its choice behavior is observed and recorded. When the adult enters the pear-shaped bottle, or crosses 2 / 3 of an arm and stays for more than 30 seconds, it is judged that the test insect has chosen the odor source on that side; if the adult does not make a choice in the introduction tube for 5 minutes, it is considered as no response. After each test of one insect, the insect chamber is blown with a hair dryer for 5 minutes to remove possible residual volatiles. After every test of 5 insects, a new reagent-containing absorbent cotton is replaced, and the treatment and control are swapped to reduce the possible influence of the odor source and orientation on the choice of the adult. Three concentration gradients are set for each volatile (stock solution, 10% solution and 1% solution, diluted with liquid paraffin), and each concentration gradient is repeated 3 times. After each test, all pipes of the olfactometer were flushed with ethanol (analytical grade, 75%). The test was conducted at room temperature of 25-30°C, with a homemade dark box and uniform natural light above the olfactometer to prevent other light from affecting the behavioral test.
[0025] Example 3: Analysis of the olfactory response of Alaska's flat-faced aphid fly to volatiles of host plants The female insects showed the strongest reaction rate to 1% benzaldehyde solution. The reaction rate of caryophyllene to the original solution was the highest at 48.33%, which was significantly higher than that of hexanal, 2-methyl-3-octene, benzaldehyde and 1-chlorododecane ( P =0.029, P =0.004, P =0.001 and P =0.001); the reaction rate of benzaldehyde in 10% solution was the highest at 33.33%, and there was no significant difference among the eight volatiles ( df =7, F =2.752, P =0.067); the reaction rate of benzaldehyde in 1% solution was the highest, significantly higher than that of the other 7 volatiles ( df =7, F =7.170, P =0.001). After multiple comparisons, it was found that the female insects had a higher reaction rate to benzaldehyde, which had no significant difference with caryophyllene and eugenol ( P =0.715 and P=0.105). In addition, the concentration had a great influence on the selection of A. alashanensis. Among the eight volatiles tested, the different contents of active ingredients caused significant differences in the selection of A. alashanensis.
[0026] Table 1: Behavioral responses of sexually mature female insects to volatiles from different organs of Cistanche deserticola
[0027] Note: The data in Table 1 are mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters after the data in the same column represent the difference in reaction rate and corrected reaction rate of the same volatile at different concentrations. Capital letters represent the difference in reaction rate and corrected reaction rate of different volatiles at the same concentration. P =0.05 indicated significant differences in levels, and the least significant difference method (LSD) was used for the test, the same below.
[0028] The results of variance analysis showed that df1=23, df2=48, P=0.987 showed that the selectivity of male insects to caryophyllene in the original solution was the highest at 60.00%, and there was no significant difference between them and eugenol and 1-chlorododecane (P=1.000, P=0.104), but there were extremely significant differences between them and benzaldehyde, hexadecane, hexadecane, limonene and 2-methyl-3-octene (P<0.01). In the 10% solution, the reaction rates of eugenol and benzaldehyde were the highest at 38.33%, and there were significant differences between them and 2-methyl-3-octene, hexadecane and limonene (P=0.007, P=0.003 and P=0.003 respectively). In the 1% solution, the reaction rate of benzaldehyde was the highest at 46.67%, and there was no significant difference between them and 1-chlorododecane (P=0.238), but there were extremely significant differences between them and the other six volatiles (P<0.01). After multiple comparisons, it was found that the male insects had a higher reaction rate to caryophyllene, benzaldehyde and eugenol, but there was no significant difference among the three (P=0.296, P=0.861 and P=0.383).
[0029] Table 2: Behavioral responses of sexually mature male insects to volatiles from different organs of Cistanche deserticola
[0030] Example 4: Using a single factor to attract Alashan flat-faced aphid flies in the field Based on the records in the above-mentioned embodiments 1 to 3, according to the olfactory selection experiment, 8 volatiles that have a positive attraction to the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly were selected for field trapping experiments, starting before the peak of adult appearance, and lasting for 15 days in 5 different test plots in Ajiele Town, Qiemo County, Xinjiang. 1 mL of each volatile was selected and added to a slow-release bottle, and the yellow sticky insect board and the slow-release bottle were used to trap in the field, and the trap was hung on the north side of the Haloxylon ammodendron tree 1.0-1.2 m above the ground. The interval between the traps of the same volatile substance was at least 15 m, and the interval between the traps of different volatile substances was 200 m. Each treatment was repeated 5 times. After hanging, the number of adults of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly on the trap was observed every 3 days, and the yellow board was replaced at the same time, and the male and female adults were recorded separately, and a total of 15 days were recorded.
[0031] There are some differences in the attracting effects of different volatiles on the adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid fly in the field ( df =9, F =23.556, P <0.001). Among them, caryophyllene and eugenol had stronger attractant effects, with a total number of 337 and 329 trapped in each trap in 15 days, and an average of 13.48 and 13.6 trapped. The order of the trapping effects of the eight volatiles and their mixtures on adults every 3 days was eugenol> caryophyllene> limonene> benzaldehyde> 2-methyl-3-octene> mixture> hexadecane> CK> hexanal.
[0032] A one-way ANOVA analysis of the average trapping volume over 3 days showed that there was no significant difference between eugenol and caryophyllene ( P =0.855), but compared with other volatiles and CK, there were significant differences; the capture rate of adults by 1-chlorododecane and hexanal was lower than that of CK, and there was no significant difference in the capture rate of Alashan flat-faced aphid fly compared with CK ( P =0.362), the trapping amounts of other volatiles and mixtures were higher than those of CK, and the next step is to screen different formulas to optimize the trapping effect.
[0033] There are some differences in the attracting effects of volatile field attractants on males and females. Caryophyllene has a stronger trapping effect on female insects, with an average of 7.32 insects per trap, followed by eugenol. Eugenol has a better attracting effect on male insects, with an average of 9.12 insects per trap, followed by limonene. Variance analysis shows that the number of female insects attracted by caryophyllene is significantly higher than that of male insects. There are significant differences between the sexes in the selectivity of female and male insects for eugenol, limonene, caryophyllene, 1-chlorododecane, and benzaldehyde, but no significant differences for other volatiles. In the field, eugenol and caryophyllene have better attracting effects.
[0034] Table 3: The attracting effect of different volatiles on Alashan flat-faced aphid flies
[0035] Table 4: The trapping effects and parameters of different volatile substances on female and male Alaska flat-faced aphid flies
[0036] Note: The data in the table are mean ± SD. Paired T test was used to illustrate the different selectivity of male and female insects for the same volatiles. The ratio of each volatile in the mixture was 1:1.
[0037] Example 5: Indoor compound olfactory response of Alashan flat-faced aphid fly to host plant volatiles According to the experimental results of Example 2 to Example 4, 4 volatiles that have a significant attraction to Alashan flat-faced aphid flies in the field compared with CK are selected: eugenol, limonene, benzaldehyde, and caryophyllene for indoor compounding tests between different components, selection basis and preparation of plant-based attractant formula solution: According to the monomer volatiles attraction test, 3 fleshy stems plus 1 inflorescence volatiles are selected for compounding tests. The best attraction concentration of the 4 plant volatiles screened by the experiment for Alashan flat-faced aphid flies is used as the basis for setting 17 binary, ternary, and quaternary formulas. Each plant-based attractant formula takes 2, 3, and 4 corresponding plant volatile monomers, mixes and dissolves in 100 mL of liquid paraffin, so that the final concentrations of these various pure monomers are the same as the best attraction concentrations of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies adults. See Table 5 for details, and the prepared formula solutions are stored for standby use. The reaction of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies to compound host plant volatiles was tested using a Y-type olfactometer, and the specific test method was the same as Example 1.
[0038] Table 5: Ratio ingredients and concentration
[0039] Example 6: Analysis of the indoor compound olfactory response of Alashan flat-faced aphid fly to host plant volatiles Based on the records in Example 5 above, the indoor attractant selection after the active substances were compounded showed that the average selection rate of No. 16 was the highest, which was 67.50%, among which the selection rate of female adults reached 65.00%, especially the selection rate of male adults reached 70.00%, which was significantly higher than that of other test groups. The average selection rate of No. 1 was the lowest, which was 30.84%, and the average selection rates of the two-component ratios of No. 1-9 were lower than those of the three-component and four-component ratios of No. 10-17.
[0040] Table 6: Behavioral selection of Alxa flat-faced aphid flies on compound bait cores
[0041] Note: Data: mean ± SD, different letters in the same column represent P =0.05 level, the difference is significant.
[0042] Embodiment 7: indoor optimization attractant formula Based on the records in the above-mentioned Examples 2 to 6, according to the selection of the attractant rate of binary, ternary, and quaternary compound attractants, the No. 16 ratio (benzaldehyde + caryophyllene + limonene + eugenol stock solution) was determined as the optimized formula, and a four-factor three-level orthogonal experiment was conducted. The orthogonal test factors and levels are shown in Table 7. Twenty Alashan flat-faced aphid flies were tested as a group. One side arm of the Y-shaped olfactometer was filled with host plant volatiles, the other side arm was liquid paraffin (CK), and the main arm was placed with test insects. The air flow rate in the test arm was 0.4 L·min -1 , female and male insects were tested separately, and the adults were placed in the central insect chamber of the Y-shaped olfactometer, one adult was placed each time, and their selection behavior was observed and recorded.
[0043] Table 7: Indoor formula optimization table
[0044] Embodiment 8: indoor optimization attractant formula analysis Different formulas had different attraction rates for adults and there were significant differences among the groups (Table 8), df=8, F=1120.03, P<0.01. The average attraction rate of formula No. 9 was the highest, 75.33%, which was significantly higher than the other 8 formulas P<0.05. The order of average attraction rate was No. 9> No. 1> No. 8> No. 6> No. 4> No. 3> No. 2> No. 7> No. 5, among which there was no significant difference in average attraction rate among groups 8, 6, 4, and 3 P>0.05.
[0045] There were significant differences in the attraction rates of female insects among different formulas (Table 8), df=8, F=992.18, P<0.01. The order of the attraction rates of the formulas was No. 9> No. 8> No. 4> No. 1> No. 3> No. 6> No. 2> No. 7> No. 5, among which the attraction rate of No. 9 was significantly higher than that of the other 8 formulas P<0.05, with an attraction rate of 73.86%. There was no significant difference in the attraction rates among the formulas No. 1, No. 3 and No. 6 P=1.00. There were significant differences in the attraction rates of male insects among different formulas, df=8, F=7.571, P<0.01. The order of the formula attraction rate was 9>1>3>4>6>8>2>5>7. There was no significant difference in attraction rate between groups 9, 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 2 (P>0.05). The attraction rate of group 9 was the highest at 76.67%. There was no significant difference in attraction rate between groups 5 and 7 (P=0.812), but it was significantly lower than the attraction rates of the other 7 groups. The comparison of the attraction rate between male and female insects of the same formula found that only 2 groups had a difference in attraction rate between male and female (P=0.04), and there was no significant difference in attraction rate between the other 8 groups.
[0046] Table 8: Attraction rate of different indoor formulas
[0047] Example 9: Field Optimization Attractant Trapping Method and Formula Based on the records in the above-mentioned Examples 2 to 8, when luring adults of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly, a slow-release bottle is used as a carrier, and benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene and eugenol are added to the bottle to form a uniform liquid, which is then combined with yellow sticky insect boards for trapping. The traps are randomly hung on branches with a crown width of 1 / 3 of the ground on the south side of the Haloxylon ammodendron tree with a thin iron wire, and the adjacent traps are more than 15m apart, and the yellow sticky insect boards are replaced every 3d.
[0048] According to the range analysis in Table 9, the order of priority of the influencing factors is D>B>C>A, that is, eugenol is the main influencing factor of the trapping rate of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant, followed by caryophyllene, limonene and benzaldehyde. According to the results of k1, k2 and k3 values in Table 9, the optimal level combination of each factor is determined to be A3B2C1D3, that is, the optimized formula for the preparation method of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant is: 3 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 parts of caryophyllene, 1 part of limonene, and 3 parts of eugenol.
[0049] Table 9: Intuitive analysis table of orthogonal test for volatile screening
[0050] Note: In the table, A=benzaldehyde, B=caryophyllene, C=limonene, D=eugenol. The attracting effect of the same formula was different between male and female insects, Table 10. The attracting effects of No. 4, No. 6 and No. 8 were significantly different between the two sexes, among which the attractant amount of No. 4 formula for female insects was 5.83 / trap in 3 days, which was significantly higher than the attractant amount of 4.76 / trap for male insects in 3 days P=0.042, the attractant amount of No. 6 formula for female insects was 8.60 / trap in 3 days, which was significantly higher than the attractant amount of 3.80 / trap for male insects in 3 days P=0.001, and the attractant amount of No. 8 formula for male insects was 7.05 / trap in 3 days, which was significantly higher than the attractant amount of 3.60 / trap for female insects in 3 days P=0.001.
[0051] The order of attractant effects on female insects is No. 6>No. 9>No. 3>No. 4>No. 2>No. 1>No. 8>CK>No. 5>No. 7, among which No. 6 has the best attractant effect on female insects, with an average attractant amount of 8.60 / trap in 3 days. There is no significant difference in attractant effect between No. 6 and No. 9, P=0.058, and the attractant effect of No. 6 is significantly higher than that of the other 8 formulas; there is no significant difference in attractant effect among No. 3, 6 and 9; No. 7 has the worst attractant effect, with an average attractant amount of 2.63 / trap in 3 days, and there is no significant difference in attractant effect between No. 5, 7, 8 and CK.
[0052] The order of attractant effects on male insects is No. 9>No. 3>No. 8>No. 4>No. 2>No. 6>No. 1>CK>No. 5>No. 7, among which No. 9 has the best attractant effect on male insects, with an average attractant amount of 8.06 / trap in 3 days. There is no significant difference in attractant effect between No. 3 and No. 9, P=0.341, and the attractant effect of No. 9 is significantly higher than the other 8 formulas except No. 3; there is no significant difference in attractant effect among No. 1, 2, 4 and 6; No. 7 has the worst attractant effect, with an average attractant amount of 2.38 / trap in 3 days, and there is no significant difference in attractant effect between No. 1, 5, 7, 8 and CK.
[0053] Table 10: The trapping effects and parameters of different attractants on female and male Alashan flat-faced aphid flies
[0054] The embodiments described above are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. The detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention claimed for protection, but only represents selected embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained without creative work and related deductions and substitutions made by ordinary technicians in the field under the conditions of the concept of the present invention belong to the scope of protection of the present invention.
Claims
1. An attractant for adults of Alashan flat-faced aphid flies, characterized in that: The formula of the attractant includes: benzaldehyde, caryophyllene, limonene and eugenol.
2. The Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that By weight, it comprises 3-5 parts of benzaldehyde, 2-4 parts of caryophyllene, 1-3 parts of limonene and 3-5 parts of eugenol.
3. The Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that It includes 3 parts of benzaldehyde, 2 parts of caryophyllene, 1 part of limonene and 3 parts of eugenol.
4. Use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as described in any one of claims 1 to 3.
5. The use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that: Use a slow-release bottle as a carrier, add the prepared Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant into the slow-release bottle, and use the trap formed by combining it with a yellow sticky insect board for trapping.
6. Use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas.
7. Use of the Alashan flat-faced aphid fly adult attractant as claimed in claim 6 in the preparation of pest control drugs for Cistanche deserticola planting areas, characterized in that: Hang the traps on branches on the south side of the Haloxylon ammodendron tree at 1 / 3 of the height from the ground. The adjacent traps should be at least 15 m apart. Replace the yellow sticky insect board every 3 days and the attractant every 9 days.