Urban pipe gallery planning method and device

Abstract

The invention provides an urban pipe gallery planning method and device, and belongs to the technical field of urban planning. The method comprises the steps that influence parameters of urban pipe gallery planning are acquired, and the type of an urban pipe gallery is determined according to the influence parameters; a first score corresponding to the first level planning, a second score corresponding to the second level planning and a third score corresponding to the third level planning are calculated through a preset data model according to the influence parameters, and the first score, the second score and the third score are adjusted based on the type of the urban pipe gallery. And determining a final plan of the urban pipe gallery according to the adjusted first score, the adjusted second score and the adjusted third score. The urban pipe gallery planning provided by the invention is more objective and reasonable.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of urban planning, and specifically relates to a method and device for urban pipe gallery planning, electronic equipment, a computer-readable storage medium, and a computer program product. Background Art

[0002] With the acceleration of urbanization, efficient use of urban space and improvement of infrastructure have become important issues in urban development. The traditional method of laying underground pipelines has many problems such as unreasonable space utilization, difficult construction and maintenance, repeated excavation, and has a great impact on traffic and the surrounding environment. Therefore, the integrated pipeline corridor, as an underground corridor that unifies the planning, design, construction and management of various urban infrastructures (such as water supply, electricity, communications, drainage, gas, etc.), has gradually become an important development direction in modern urban planning.

[0003] However, the construction of integrated pipe corridors involves many factors, such as geological conditions, topography, urban planning, pipeline density, economic benefits, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive and scientific analysis of the suitability of integrated pipe corridors. Existing analysis methods for the suitability of integrated pipe corridors often fail to fully consider the dynamic changes of urban development, lack a comprehensive assessment of multi-dimensional factors, and are difficult to adapt to the complex urban environment and future development needs. Therefore, how to scientifically and rationally evaluate the suitability of integrated pipe corridors has become an urgent problem to be solved in the current technical field. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention aims to solve at least one of the technical problems existing in the prior art and to provide a method and device, a computer-readable storage medium and a computer program product that can scientifically and reasonably plan urban pipeline corridors.

[0005] In order to achieve the above objectives, in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method for urban utility corridor planning, wherein the urban utility corridor planning is divided into first-level planning, second-level planning, and third-level planning, and the method includes:

[0006] Obtaining influencing parameters of the urban utility corridor planning, and determining the type of the urban utility corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning;

[0007] Calculating a first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter using a preset data model, adjusting the first score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determining a first result according to the adjusted first score;

[0008] Calculating a second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjusting the second score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determining a second result according to the adjusted second score;

[0009] A third score corresponding to the third-level planning is calculated based on the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, and the third score is adjusted based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and a third result is determined based on the adjusted third score, and the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor is determined based on the third result.

[0010] In some embodiments, the adjusting the first score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0011] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the GDP parameter, the construction and operation mechanism parameter, and the construction cost-benefit parameter in the first parameter;

[0012] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the natural disaster frequency parameter and the natural disaster impact parameter in the first parameter.

[0013] In some embodiments, adjusting the second score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0014] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the newly built area parameter, underground space planning parameter and pipeline demand parameter in the second parameter;

[0015] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a small utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the road short-term planning parameter and the renewal area parameter in the second parameter;

[0016] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the renewal area parameter and the historical style area parameter in the second parameter;

[0017] If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a park pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the industrial zone parameter in the second parameter.

[0018] In some embodiments, adjusting the third score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0019] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the road grade parameter, the road underground space planning parameter, the excavation frequency parameter, and the current pipeline chaos degree parameter in the third parameter;

[0020] If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a small pipeline corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the pipeline stability parameter, the pipeline chaos degree parameter, and the recent pipeline renovation plan parameter in the third parameter.

[0021] In some embodiments, the first result includes: a city in urgent need of building a pipeline corridor, a city in need of building a pipeline corridor in the short term, and a city with a pipeline corridor planned to be built;

[0022] The second result includes: priority construction area, suitable construction area, appropriate construction area, restricted construction area, and cautious construction area;

[0023] The third results include: preferred road construction, road construction is needed, road construction is suitable, road construction is possible, and road construction is not temporarily planned.

[0024] In some embodiments, the method further comprises:

[0025] Determine the difference index according to the type of the urban pipeline corridor;

[0026] The preset data model is adjusted according to the difference index to obtain an adjusted data model, and the first score, the second score and / or the third score are calculated based on the adjusted data model.

[0027] In a second aspect, the present disclosure further provides a device for planning an urban integrated pipe gallery, wherein the urban pipe gallery planning is divided into first-level planning, second-level planning, and third-level planning, and the device comprises:

[0028] An acquisition device is used to acquire the influencing parameters of the urban utility corridor planning, and determine the type of the urban utility corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning;

[0029] A first calculation module, configured to calculate a first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter using a preset data model, adjust the first score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determine a first result according to the adjusted first score;

[0030] a second calculation module, configured to calculate a second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjust the second score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determine a second result according to the adjusted second score;

[0031] The third calculation module is used to calculate the third score corresponding to the third-level planning according to the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, adjust the third score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, determine the third result according to the adjusted third score, and determine the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor according to the third result.

[0032] In a third aspect, the present disclosure further provides an electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the program, the computing method of the first aspect described above is implemented.

[0033] In a fourth aspect, the present disclosure further provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program for executing the computing method of the first aspect.

[0034] In a fifth aspect, the present disclosure further provides a computer program product, including a computer program / instruction, which implements the steps of the computing method of the first aspect when the computer program / instruction is executed by a processor.

[0035] The disclosed embodiment adopts a hierarchical approach to analyze the suitability of the construction of a comprehensive pipeline corridor and a planning method, determines the evaluation index of the urban pipeline corridor planning based on the parameters affecting the pipeline corridor planning corresponding to each level of planning, and obtains a set of scientific and objective evaluation system for urban pipeline corridor planning. According to the evaluation system, each city, each district and each street is scored to determine the preliminary planning of the urban pipeline corridor. Furthermore, based on the type of urban pipeline corridor, each score is adjusted to determine the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor, so that the planning of the urban pipeline corridor is more accurate, objective, and more in line with actual needs. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present disclosure. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0037] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for urban pipeline corridor planning provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0038] Figure 2.1 to Figure 2.3 Schematic diagrams of a first parameter corresponding to a first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to a second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to a third-level planning;

[0039] Figure 3 A structural block diagram of a city pipe gallery planning device provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure;

[0040] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the physical structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0041] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solution of the present invention, the present invention is further described in detail and completely in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present disclosure, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.

[0042] At present, there are some methods for the planning of comprehensive pipeline corridors, including analysis methods based on GIS (geographic information system) technology, which integrate urban geographic information, pipeline information and other related data to provide visual suitability assessment tools for planning urban pipeline corridors. However, these methods still have shortcomings in multi-objective decision-making, dynamic change adaptability and cost-benefit analysis.

[0043] This analysis method often only focuses on one or a few factors (such as geological conditions or pipeline density), and fails to fully consider multi-dimensional factors (such as urban planning, economic benefits, environmental impact, etc.). This single-dimensional analysis method easily leads to incomplete evaluation results, ignores other important influencing factors, and lacks multi-dimensional comprehensive analysis. Moreover, urban development is dynamic, and factors such as geography, economy, and planning will change over time. However, most of the existing analysis techniques are static assessments, lack the ability to predict future development trends and changes, and cannot make accurate judgments on future suitability. Furthermore, the construction of integrated pipeline corridors involves huge economic investment, and existing methods often fail to fully consider cost-effectiveness analysis, ignoring the balance between construction costs and long-term benefits, resulting in a lack of economic feasibility assessment for construction decisions. Finally, some of the existing technologies rely on complex GIS or other technologies, which are difficult to operate and apply, require high technical capabilities of relevant personnel, and have high implementation costs, making them unsuitable for promotion and use in all cities.

[0044] In response to the above problems, some technologies in the prior art also use expert scoring methods or weighted scoring methods to evaluate the suitability of the integrated pipeline corridor in order to plan the urban pipeline corridor. However, such methods rely on subjective experience, lack systematic quantitative analysis, and cannot fully reflect the complex relationship between various influencing factors. Although this method is simple, due to the different experiences and judgment criteria of different experts, the evaluation results are easily affected by subjective factors and lack consistency and scientificity. In addition, many methods in the prior art tend to be qualitative analysis, and quantitative analysis tools are rarely used. As a result, it is difficult to accurately measure the degree of influence of various factors and it is impossible to accurately quantify the suitability of the construction of the integrated pipeline corridor.

[0045] In view of the above-mentioned problems existing in the prior art, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide a more comprehensive, objective and dynamically adaptive urban pipeline corridor planning method to improve the scientificity and rationality of the construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors.

[0046] This paper studies the planning and construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors, takes green and low-carbon, adapting to local conditions, and scientific and orderly as research principles, determines the restrictive conditions in terms of time, space, capital cost, social cost, etc. for the construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors, and determines the planning and construction indicators of comprehensive pipeline corridors based on the hierarchical analysis method, and derives a comprehensive pipeline corridor planning method based on the indicators.

[0047] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method for planning an urban pipeline corridor.

[0048] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for urban pipeline corridor planning provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 2.1 to Figure 2.3 Schematic diagrams of the first parameter corresponding to the first level planning, the second parameter corresponding to the second level planning, and the third parameter corresponding to the third level planning. The urban pipeline corridor planning is divided into the first level planning, the second level planning, and the third level planning. Optionally, the first level planning can be a macro planning, such as planning at the city level; the second level planning can be a meso planning, such as planning at the district level; the third level planning can be a micro planning, such as planning at the road level. Of course, the present disclosure can also divide the levels of urban pipeline corridor planning in other ways, and the present disclosure does not limit this.

[0049] For the sake of convenience, the following embodiments of the present disclosure are described by taking the first-level planning as city-level planning, the second-level planning as district-level planning, and the third-level planning as road-level planning as examples. Figure 1 As shown, the method specifically comprises the following steps:

[0050] S1. Obtain influencing parameters of the urban utility corridor planning, and determine the type of the urban utility corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning.

[0051] S2. Calculate a first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter using a preset data model, adjust the first score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine a first result based on the adjusted first score.

[0052] S3. Calculate a second score corresponding to the second-level planning based on the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjust the second score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine a second result based on the adjusted second score.

[0053] S4. Calculate the third score corresponding to the third-level planning according to the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, adjust the third score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, determine the third result according to the adjusted third score, and determine the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor according to the third result.

[0054] Among them, the influencing parameter refers to the evaluation index that affects the planning of urban pipeline corridor construction. Optionally, the first parameter refers to the evaluation index of the planning and construction of urban integrated pipeline corridors, the second parameter refers to the evaluation index of the planning and construction of district integrated pipeline corridors, and the third parameter refers to the evaluation index of the planning and construction of road integrated pipeline corridors. Optionally, such as Figure 2.1 to Figure 2.3 As shown, each level of indicators can also include primary indicators and secondary indicators.

[0055] The preset data model is used to determine the weight of each parameter in the influencing parameters. For the parameters corresponding to each level of planning, the first-level indicator or second-level indicator in the parameter determines the corresponding weight according to the indicator level (first-level indicator or second-level indicator), and then the corresponding score of the regional comprehensive pipeline corridor planning corresponding to the level of planning to be judged can be calculated based on the weight of each parameter.

[0056] In addition, the disclosure determines the rationality of the weights selected for different parameters based on objective factors such as city level, regional topography, construction conditions, etc., thereby determining the scores of each level of planning. However, the weight indicators at each level used in the disclosure may have certain deviations for different types of pipeline corridors, or in different regions and areas, thereby affecting the final planning. The disclosure adjusts the scores corresponding to each level of planning based on the type of city pipeline corridors, so that the final planning is more accurate.

[0057] In the disclosed embodiment, the city where the urban pipeline corridor is to be constructed is first determined from multiple cities, then the specific area where the urban pipeline corridor is to be constructed is determined based on the selected city, and finally the specific street where the urban pipeline corridor is to be constructed is determined based on the selected area, thereby completing the planning of the urban pipeline corridor.

[0058] The disclosed embodiment adopts a hierarchical approach to analyze the suitability of the construction of a comprehensive pipeline corridor and a planning method, determines the evaluation index of the urban pipeline corridor planning based on the parameters affecting the pipeline corridor planning corresponding to each level of planning, and obtains a set of scientific and objective evaluation system for urban pipeline corridor planning. According to the evaluation system, each city, each district and each street is scored to determine the preliminary planning of the urban pipeline corridor. Furthermore, based on the type of urban pipeline corridor, each score is adjusted to determine the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor, so that the planning of the urban pipeline corridor is more accurate, objective, and more in line with actual needs.

[0059] In some embodiments, the process of respectively calculating the first score, the second score and the third score by using the preset data model in the above steps S2 to S4 specifically includes:

[0060] First, based on relevant engineering experience and data, a data model is established, and the scale of each influencing parameter is determined based on the importance of each influencing parameter through the data model. Table 1.1 is a table of the scale survey and consultation results of the influencing parameters. Table 1.2 is a table of the meaning of each scale. As shown in Table 1.1, the relationship between factor 1 and factor 3 in the statistical consultation results (taking the 1-9 scale method as an example) is that factor 3 is obviously more important than factor 1, and the relationship between factor 2 and factor 3 is that factor 3 is more obviously important than factor 2 (the importance is between scale 5 and scale 7). The rest of the scales are specifically shown in Table 1.1 below. Among them, factor 1, factor 2, and factor 3 in Table 1.1 can refer to various parameters in hierarchical planning. For the specific meaning of each scale, please refer to Table 1.2.

[0061] Table 1.1 Scaling consultation results of influencing parameters

[0062] Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 1 1 1 1 / 5 Factor 2 1 1 1 / 6 Factor 3 5 6 1

[0063] Table 1.2 Meaning of each scale

[0064]

[0065] Secondly, make a judgment matrix based on the survey questionnaire.

[0066]

[0067] Then, the above judgment matrix is ​​used as a characteristic matrix to find the maximum eigenvalue.

[0068]

[0069] Then, the weight coefficient of each factor is calculated based on the maximum eigenvalue.

[0070]

[0071] Finally, the average of the weight coefficients is calculated to obtain the final weight coefficient of each influencing factor.

[0072] Finally, based on the above calculations, the weight coefficient of each influencing factor can be obtained and the overall scoring result of the comprehensive pipeline corridor planning and construction in the area to be judged can be calculated, and then the scoring result can be adjusted and the result of the appropriate planning of the urban pipeline corridor can be obtained according to the adjusted scores.

[0073] The following specifically introduces the planning method involved in the present disclosure from three levels: city level, district level and road level.

[0074] 1. City Level

[0075] like Figure 2.1 As shown, in some embodiments, the first parameter corresponding to the first level planning includes four parameters: city scale, natural conditions, policy mechanism and pipeline conditions, and the four parameters influence each other. For the above four parameters, each parameter includes multiple secondary indicators, see Table 1.3 below for details, where Table 1.3 is the evaluation indicator corresponding to the first parameter.

[0076] Table 1.3 Evaluation indicators corresponding to the first parameter

[0077]

[0078] 1) City size

[0079] City level: The per capita underground space demand in cities of different levels is different, and there is a step gap between the planning and construction of underground comprehensive pipe corridors of different levels. Based on statistical analysis and the experience of underground space development in various cities, it is predicted that the per capita indicator of first-level cities will be set at 9m / person. Due to the increase in urbanization rate, the urban population is still considerable, and the underground space will continue to be developed to improve the livability and comfort. The future of second-level cities is equivalent to the present of first-level cities. The development of underground space in second-level cities can refer to that of first-level cities, so the forecast period indicator is about 6.5m / person, and so on.

[0080] GDP: Economic efficiency directly affects the construction of urban pipelines. Compared with the high investment of underground space in ground buildings, the development of underground comprehensive pipeline corridors will not appear on a large scale before the economic level reaches a certain threshold.

[0081] Population density: The greater the population density, the greater the demand for pipeline corridor construction. As the size of cities expands and population density increases, the city's convergence effect begins to become apparent. The demand for intensive land use and three-dimensional transportation, as well as the corresponding land, transportation, and environmental issues, have led to the development of underground space and the construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors.

[0082] Urban area: The size of the urban area affects the possibility of deep underground space development and construction. The vertical layered development of urban underground space requires a reasonable model so that the development of urban underground space can develop relevant functional facilities at the corresponding spatial level according to certain principles, avoid contradictions in the occupation of underground space development, and ensure the reasonable and harmonious development and utilization of underground space.

[0083] 2) Natural conditions:

[0084] Since the integrated pipeline corridor is an underground structure, the frequency of natural disasters and their impacts must be taken into consideration in the planning and construction of the urban integrated pipeline corridor as an important evaluation indicator.

[0085] Frequency of natural disasters: The internal and external environments of the utility corridor are constantly changing. The frequency of disasters in different cities varies, which affects the planning and construction of the utility corridor. Publicly reported utility corridor operation and maintenance disasters include fires (which may cause explosions), earthquakes (which may cause explosions), and floods. The frequency of geological disasters is closely related to the nature of the stratum and groundwater level of the utility corridor, and is a key factor affecting the construction cost and operating costs of the utility corridor.

[0086] Impact of natural disasters: Natural disasters in utility corridors are caused by changes in objective natural conditions, including meteorological disasters (such as heavy rain or high temperature), hydrological disasters (such as floods) and geological disasters (such as earthquakes), which damage the structure of utility corridors, affect their normal functions, and endanger human living environment. The impact of natural disasters in different cities is different, and the disaster prevention strategies of utility corridors are different, which affects planning and construction.

[0087] 3) Policy mechanism:

[0088] In order to better carry out the construction of the pipeline corridor, ensure that all work contents are carried out in an orderly manner during the construction as much as possible, and avoid chaotic management, it is effective to use laws, regulations and other relevant provisions to effectively restrain enterprises and construction personnel.

[0089] Relevant laws and regulations: The underground utility corridor is a relatively large-scale project, which involves a relatively wide range of interests, which has hindered the construction progress to a certain extent. In order to further speed up the overall construction progress, it is necessary to further improve the relevant laws and regulations. Therefore, laws and regulations affect the construction level of a city's comprehensive utility corridor.

[0090] Construction and operation mechanism: Strengthen the overall management of enterprises and construction units, optimize and improve the management departments, and ensure that the management work can be carried out normally. If you want to further improve the overall construction efficiency, you must also ensure that the overall construction process and links can proceed normally. By establishing a full-time management department, you can further improve the construction progress and accuracy.

[0091] 4) Pipeline conditions:

[0092] The structure of underground utility corridors is relatively complex, and the internal pipelines are intricate. It is necessary to have a clear and definite plan for the pipeline layout and the direction of the pipeline corridor in the early stage, and to conduct a thorough investigation of the site.

[0093] For example, in a certain year, 1,723 underground pipeline-related accidents were collected. Among them, 1,355 underground pipeline damage accidents accounted for 78.64% of the total number of underground pipeline-related accidents. The causes of pipeline accidents can be classified into structural hazards, external damage, environmental factors, and management defects. The accident losses and frequencies of pipelines vary between cities.

[0094] Cost and benefits of pipeline construction: Urban underground integrated pipeline corridors are the most effective way to achieve sustainable utilization of urban underground space, and their comprehensive benefits are significant. However, compared with direct burial of pipelines, the one-time capital investment in the construction of integrated pipeline corridors is relatively large. When the construction of integrated pipeline corridors is no longer vigorously promoted as an assessment target, due to the lack of investment decision-making basis for integrated pipeline corridors, most people only pay attention to the high direct construction cost of pipeline corridors when making investment decisions for integrated pipeline corridor projects, and will be cautious in launching new integrated pipeline corridor projects. In addition, the current cost recovery mechanism for integrated pipeline corridors is not yet sound, which affects the sustainable development of integrated pipeline corridors.

[0095] According to the secondary indicators in the primary indicators in the first parameter above, the first score corresponding to the first-level planning is obtained through the preset data model analysis. Further, the first score is adjusted based on the type of urban pipeline corridor to obtain the scoring standard for the urban-level comprehensive pipeline corridor planning indicators. The specific scoring standards are shown in Table 1.4 below. Six cities are selected based on the above scoring standards for evaluation, and the scoring results are obtained, see Table 1.5 below. Among them, Table 1.4 is the scoring standard for each parameter at the urban level, and Table 1.5 is the scoring results of the six cities at the first level.

[0096] Table 1.4 Scoring criteria for each parameter in the city level

[0097]

[0098] Table 1.5 Scoring results of the six cities at the first level

[0099]

[0100]

[0101] In some embodiments, the first result includes: a city where pipeline corridors are urgently needed to be built, a city where pipeline corridors need to be built in the short term, and a city where pipeline corridors are planned to be built.

[0102] Specifically, referring to Tables 1.4 to 1.5 above, based on the integration of the above data, an overall evaluation of the suitability and planning methods of integrated pipeline corridors at the city level is obtained: cities with scores between 2.5 and 3 points are cities that urgently need to build pipeline corridors, cities with scores between 1.5 and 2.5 points are cities that need to build pipeline corridors in the short term, and cities with scores below 1.5 points are cities that plan to build pipeline corridors.

[0103] II. Area Level

[0104] As Figure 2.2 As shown, in some embodiments, the second parameter includes construction level, district planning, land use nature and historical and cultural conditions.

[0105] Specifically, by comprehensively studying the relevant provisions of existing specifications, standards, policies and regulations on the areas where comprehensive pipe corridors can be built in cities, the factors affecting the location of comprehensive pipe corridor construction at the district level are determined. Table 1.6 shows the evaluation indicators corresponding to the second parameter at the district level. The second parameter includes primary indicators and secondary indicators.

[0106] Table 1.6 Evaluation indicators corresponding to the second parameter at the area level

[0107]

[0108]

[0109] 1) Construction level: The level of regional development and construction is one of the important factors that should be considered when planning the layout of the integrated pipeline corridor. When building an integrated pipeline corridor in a new area, the existing construction situation in the area is relatively small, the construction cost of the pipeline corridor is low, and the impact on the surrounding traffic and social and economic operations is relatively small. The construction cost and social and economic cost of building an integrated pipeline corridor in a built-up area are both high, and it will have a great impact on road traffic, affect the daily work and life of residents, and have a great impact on underground municipal pipelines.

[0110] Therefore, in order to facilitate statistical distinction, in actual evaluation, street boundaries or planning division lines can be used for analysis, and the existing proportion of built-up land can be used as the basis for division, and the planning area can be divided into new areas, areas under construction, built areas and renewal areas.

[0111] 2) Area planning:

[0112] Underground space planning: Comprehensive coordination of pipelines by integrated pipeline corridors. The municipal pipeline concentration area has dense pipelines, occupying a large amount of shallow underground space, which is not conducive to the intensive use of underground space. At the same time, there are safety hazards, and integrated pipeline corridors are needed to coordinate the pipelines.

[0113] Municipal pipeline demand: Municipal pipeline concentration areas have dense pipelines, occupying a large amount of shallow underground space.

[0114] Recent road planning: Due to the heavy traffic volume or the existence of rail transit in key road traffic areas, road excavation caused by pipeline maintenance is difficult and costly, and repeated excavation seriously affects vehicle traffic. Fourth, there is a great demand for comprehensive pipeline corridors.

[0115] 3) Nature of land use:

[0116] The nature of land use is closely related to the construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors.

[0117] Generally speaking, areas with higher functional positioning and greater development and construction intensity have higher municipal supply needs and guarantee capacity requirements. The scale of various municipal pipelines laid will be larger and the types will be more complex. The traditional method of laying them separately will occupy a large amount of underground space, so it is more appropriate to build an integrated pipeline corridor to coordinate the use of underground space; while in areas with low construction intensity, the scale of various municipal pipelines is relatively small, and the demand for building an integrated pipeline corridor is also weaker.

[0118] Comprehensive pipe corridors can effectively avoid the "road zipper" effect caused by pipeline laying and maintenance, reduce the impact on the daily life of surrounding residents, and are suitable for layout in residential and commercial business areas. However, the flow of people and vehicles in industrial areas is relatively small, and the demand for the construction of comprehensive pipe corridors is relatively weak. Therefore, according to the functional positioning and land use nature classification of different areas in the planning area, for the convenience of statistical distinction, the land can be divided into three categories: business districts, industrial parks, and residential schools, and then assigned values ​​according to specific circumstances to generate sub-item weights.

[0119] The business district refers to an office area mainly for exhibition, finance, business, culture, communication, etc. This area is characterized by numerous high-rise buildings, prominent location, beautiful environment and landscape, and is an area that represents the achievements of regional construction. It is extremely necessary to build a comprehensive pipeline corridor in the business district.

[0120] The demand for municipal pipeline resources in industrial parks is large and concentrated, especially for water, electricity, communications, energy (gas, fuel oil, etc.) and other categories of pipelines. The construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors in industrial parks can not only reasonably concentrate and merge various pipelines, and play a good intensive effect, but also greatly save the occupation of underground space that can be developed and utilized by pipeline construction, reduce the investment in duplicate construction of various pipelines, and have significant economic benefits.

[0121] The higher the residential density, the greater the demand for municipal pipeline resources, and the greater the social and economic value of building a comprehensive pipeline corridor.

[0122] 4) Historical and cultural conditions: Historical and cultural conditions mainly refer to whether the urban planning plot belongs to the historical and cultural protection area. In the urban underground space utilization planning, the historical and cultural protection area is the underground space restricted development area. Therefore, historical and cultural conditions are an important factor in determining the feasibility of comprehensive pipeline corridor construction.

[0123] Analyze the historical and cultural conditions of each planned plot in the city, and use the veto method to determine whether it belongs to a historical and cultural protection area (including a cultural relic burial area and a historical style area) or a non-historical and cultural protection area.

[0124] In the embodiment of the present disclosure, according to each secondary indicator in the primary indicator in the above second parameter, a preset data model is analyzed to obtain a second score corresponding to the second-level planning. Further, the second score is adjusted based on the type of urban pipeline corridor to obtain the scoring standard for the planning index of the district-level comprehensive pipeline corridor. The specific scoring standard is shown in Table 1.7 below. Taking city A as the research object, the 15 districts under it are evaluated respectively, and the scoring results are obtained, as shown in Table 1.8 below. Among them, Table 1.7 is the scoring standard for each parameter at the district level, and Table 1.8 is the scoring result of city A at the second level:

[0125] Table 1.7 Scoring criteria for each parameter at the district level

[0126]

[0127] Table 1.8 shows the scoring results of City A at the second level

[0128]

[0129]

[0130]

[0131]

[0132] In some embodiments, the second result includes: priority construction area, suitable construction area, appropriate construction area, restricted construction area, and cautious construction area.

[0133] Specifically, referring to Tables 1.7 and 1.8, based on the integration of the above data, an overall evaluation of the suitability of the integrated pipeline corridor and the planning method at the district level is obtained: the districts with scores between 2.2 and 2.6 are priority construction areas, the districts with scores between 1.8 and 2.2 are suitable construction areas, the districts with scores between 1.5 and 1.8 are appropriate construction areas, the districts with scores between 1.25 and 1.5 are restricted construction areas, and the districts with scores below 1.25 are cautious construction areas.

[0134] From this, we can derive the ranking of the priority integrated pipeline corridors for construction in each district of City A (from front to back): District 7, District 8, District 10, District 1, District 4, District 5, District 11, District 6, District 9, District 3, District 2, District 15, District 13, District 12, and District 14.

[0135] 3. Road Level

[0136] like Figure 2.3 As shown, in some embodiments, the third parameter includes road properties, road conditions and pipeline status.

[0137] Specifically, by comprehensively studying the relevant provisions of existing specifications, standards and policies and regulations on the areas where comprehensive pipe corridors can be built in cities, the factors affecting the location of comprehensive pipe corridor construction are determined. Table 1.9 is the evaluation index corresponding to the third parameter, see Table 1.9 below.

[0138] Table 1.9 Evaluation indicators corresponding to the third parameter

[0139]

[0140] 1) Road nature: City governments, schools, important commercial areas and residential land with high development intensity are areas with concentrated flow of people and large demand for various municipal services. Underground comprehensive pipeline corridors should cover or radiate to areas with high development intensity as much as possible to better exert the comprehensive benefits of pipeline corridors. There is less comprehensive demand for pipeline corridors in industrial land areas, and the economic benefits of building road pipeline corridors in functional areas are relatively low. The construction of road comprehensive pipeline corridors should be considered in combination with the construction conditions of the area.

[0141] The historical and cultural street is a special urban land, and the road integrated pipeline corridor within the functional area needs to be specifically analyzed based on demand.

[0142] 2) Road conditions:

[0143] Road construction time: The joint construction of pipeline corridors and roads can not only save project costs, but also shorten the construction period. Therefore, the recent road construction or renovation plan is an important opportunity for the construction of comprehensive pipeline corridors. The feasibility of constructing pipeline corridors for existing roads or roads to be built in the long term is relatively second.

[0144] Road Grade:

[0145] Urban road grades can be divided into expressways, main roads, secondary roads and branch roads in descending order. The higher the road grade, the higher the traffic function it undertakes and the greater the traffic flow. The greater the impact of road occupation caused by excavation during the construction of the integrated pipeline corridor. Therefore, when evaluating this factor, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the factors of road grade and construction impact.

[0146] Road underground space planning:

[0147] The construction of urban rail transit and underground roads is also an opportunity for urban road reconstruction. If the underground pipeline corridor can be implemented simultaneously with the construction of rail transit and underground roads, and the construction schedule is coordinated, it can effectively reduce the construction difficulty and construction cost of secondary construction, while reducing interference with the surrounding areas. If the comprehensive pipeline corridor can be built simultaneously with the planned track, on the one hand, it can avoid the traffic impact caused by repeated excavation and construction, and on the other hand, it can coordinate the spatial relationship between the comprehensive pipeline corridor and the track ancillary structures during the construction design stage, and make more reasonable and effective use of underground space.

[0148] 3) Current status of pipelines:

[0149] Current pipeline chaos

[0150] Conventional underground municipal pipelines include eight types: water supply, recycled water, electricity, telecommunications, gas, heat, rainwater, and sewage pipelines. Since rainwater and sewage pipelines are gravity pipelines, the cost of entering the corridor is relatively high, so they are generally not considered to enter the corridor. The remaining types of municipal pipelines can be evaluated comprehensively based on the characteristics, grades, scales, and compatibility of the existing different types of pipelines according to the special municipal plans, and the degree of construction chaos can be judged as an important reference indicator for the planning and construction of road comprehensive pipeline corridors.

[0151] Recent pipeline renovation plans

[0152] The road construction plan affects the construction of the integrated pipeline corridor. The construction of pipeline corridors and roads together can not only save engineering costs, but also shorten the construction period. Therefore, the recent construction or renovation plan of roads is an important opportunity for the construction of integrated pipeline corridors. The feasibility of constructing pipeline corridors on existing roads or roads to be built in the long term is relatively second.

[0153] Excavation frequency required

[0154] The frequency of excavation is an important factor affecting the planning and construction of road integrated pipe corridors. Generally speaking, the more types of municipal pipelines under the road, the greater the possibility of road excavation and the greater the necessity of setting up pipe corridors. If the integrated pipe corridor can be implemented simultaneously with the roads to be built or maintained, it will greatly reduce the impact of traffic congestion caused by the construction of the integrated pipe corridor and greatly reduce the frequency of excavation.

[0155] Pipeline stability

[0156] The stability of existing pipelines affects the construction demand of integrated pipeline corridors. The planning and construction of integrated pipeline corridors is more economical and applicable in areas with high construction density, where there are many pipelines, large pipe diameters, and high construction demand.

[0157] According to the second-level indicators in the first-level indicators in the third parameter above, the third score corresponding to the third-level planning is obtained through the preset data model analysis. Further, the third score is adjusted based on the type of urban pipeline corridor to obtain the scoring standard of the road-level comprehensive pipeline corridor planning indicators, as shown in Table 1.10 below, and four roads with built comprehensive pipeline corridors are selected for evaluation and the scoring results are obtained, as shown in Table 1.11 below. Among them, Table 1.10 is the scoring standard of each parameter at the road level, and Table 1.11 is the scoring results of the four streets at the third level.

[0158] Table 1.10 Scoring criteria for each parameter in the road hierarchy

[0159]

[0160] Table 1.11 Scoring results of the four streets at the third level

[0161]

[0162] In some embodiments, the third result includes: preferred road construction, road construction required, suitable road construction, road construction possible, and no road construction for the time being.

[0163] Specifically, referring to Tables 1.10 to 1.11 above, based on the integration of the above data, an overall evaluation of the suitability and planning methods of the integrated pipeline corridor at the road level is obtained: roads with scores between 2.5 and 2.9 are preferred roads for construction, roads with scores between 2.0 and 2.5 are roads that need to be constructed, areas with scores between 1.6 and 2.0 are suitable for road construction, roads with scores between 1.2 and 1.6 are roads that can be constructed, and roads with scores below 1.2 are roads that will not be constructed for the time being.

[0164] The disclosed embodiment selects appropriate evaluation indicators and scores from the above three levels, so as to plan the urban pipeline corridor based on the scoring results, so as to obtain the planning of the urban pipeline corridor in a scientific, reasonable and more practical way.

[0165] In some embodiments, in step S1, the type of the urban pipeline corridor is determined according to the influencing parameters, specifically including: determining the cross-section and cost of the urban pipeline corridor according to the influencing parameters, and determining the type of the urban pipeline corridor based on the cross-section and cost of the urban pipeline corridor.

[0166] Specifically, the cross-section value of the pipeline corridor refers to the shape and size of the corridor in the cross section perpendicular to the direction of the corridor. The design of the cross section depends on many factors, including construction methods, the type and number of pipelines accommodated, and functional requirements. The cross-section design of the urban integrated pipeline corridor is an important part of the urban integrated pipeline corridor engineering technical specifications, which is directly related to the safety, function and cost of the corridor. Among them, the design of the cross-section of the urban integrated pipeline corridor needs to consider factors such as the net width of the corridor channel, the connection and operation space of the pipeline, and the size of the cross section.

[0167] In some embodiments, the types of urban pipeline corridors include integrated pipeline corridors, small pipeline corridors, micro pipeline corridors and park pipeline corridors.

[0168] Specifically, the cross-section of the integrated pipeline corridor is large, the cost is high, and the construction period is long. Without sufficient financial support and a sound operation mechanism, it will greatly affect the subsequent operating income and operation and maintenance effects, and it will be difficult to establish a benign return cycle. Small pipeline corridors are mostly single-chamber cross-sections with small cross-sections and moderate costs. Compared with the integrated pipeline corridor, its volume is greatly reduced and it is more economical. It is usually suitable for construction in the renewal area, and there is no need to break the road on a large scale like the construction of the integrated pipeline corridor. At the same time, the planning of pipelines under the road should also be considered to avoid conflicts. The cross-section of the micro-pipeline corridor is small and "zero soil cover". Compared with other types of pipeline corridors, the difference is that the soil cover of this type of pipeline corridor is almost zero. In areas where natural disasters are frequent and the geology is special, the risks to the pipeline corridor are more controllable. The park pipeline corridor mainly serves the operation and maintenance of various pipelines in the park.

[0169] In some embodiments, in step S2, adjusting the first score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0170] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the GDP parameter, the construction and operation mechanism parameter, and the construction cost-benefit parameter in the first parameter;

[0171] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the natural disaster frequency parameter and the natural disaster impact parameter in the first parameter.

[0172] Specifically, due to the large scale, high cost and long construction period of the integrated pipeline corridor, if there is no sufficient financial support and a sound operation mechanism, it will greatly affect the later operation income and operation and maintenance effect, and it will be difficult to establish a healthy return cycle. Therefore, for the integrated pipeline corridor at the city level, it is necessary to further consider GDP, construction and operation mechanism, and construction cost benefits.

[0173] The difference between micro-pipeline corridors and other types of pipeline corridors is that the soil cover of this type of pipeline corridor is almost zero. In areas with frequent natural disasters and special geology, the risks posed to the pipeline corridor are more controllable. Therefore, the frequency and impact of natural disasters need to be further considered at the city level.

[0174] In some embodiments, in step S3, adjusting the second score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0175] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the newly built area parameter, underground space planning parameter and pipeline demand parameter in the second parameter;

[0176] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a small utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the road short-term planning parameter and the renewal area parameter in the second parameter;

[0177] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the renewal area parameter and the historical style area parameter in the second parameter;

[0178] If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a park pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the industrial zone parameter in the second parameter.

[0179] Specifically, the integrated pipeline corridor generally has a large cross-section and deep soil cover, and requires a large amount of space during construction. It is suitable to be carried out in the newly built area, otherwise it involves breaking and demolishing a large number of existing roads, which will have a certain impact on residents and social operations. At the same time, since the integrated pipeline corridor will occupy a large part of the underground space, it is necessary to make overall coordination at the planning level and fully consider the long-term development of underground space. In addition, it is necessary to clarify the corresponding municipal pipeline needs, whether the current pipeline situation in the area to be implemented is complicated, which pipelines need to enter the corridor, whether the demand is reasonable, and whether it will waste the space in the corridor. Therefore, at the district level, it is necessary to further consider the new district, underground space planning, and municipal pipeline needs.

[0180] Small-scale pipeline corridors are mostly single-chamber cross-sections. Compared with comprehensive pipeline corridors, their volume is greatly reduced and they are more economical. They are usually suitable for construction in renewal areas, and do not need to break roads on a large scale like building comprehensive pipeline corridors. At the same time, the planning of pipelines under the road should also be considered to avoid conflicts. Therefore, the recent planning of roads and renewal areas need to be further considered at the district level.

[0181] Micro-pipeline corridors are more suitable for construction in renewal areas or even historical areas due to their "zero soil cover" feature. This way, while improving and repairing the pipeline functions, the impact on the roads and sites is minimized. Therefore, renewal areas and historical areas need to be further considered at the district level.

[0182] In some embodiments, in step S4, adjusting the third score based on the type of the urban utility tunnel includes:

[0183] If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the road grade parameter, the road underground space planning parameter, the excavation frequency parameter, and the current pipeline chaos degree parameter in the third parameter;

[0184] If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a small pipeline corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the pipeline stability parameter, the pipeline chaos degree parameter, and the recent pipeline renovation plan parameter in the third parameter.

[0185] Specifically, when designing and constructing a comprehensive pipeline corridor, road restoration design is generally carried out simultaneously, and it occupies a large underground space, so it is not suitable to be built under a road surface where the road width is too small. The impact of road underground space planning is the same as the above-mentioned underground space planning impact. If the excavation frequency is too high, it is not suitable for the construction of a comprehensive pipeline corridor, which will greatly increase the cost. The more chaotic the existing pipelines are, the more suitable it is to build a comprehensive pipeline corridor for unified management, which will greatly reduce the pipeline maintenance cost compared to direct burial. Therefore, at the road level, it is necessary to further consider the road grade, road underground space planning, the frequency of excavation required, and the degree of chaos of the existing pipelines.

[0186] The advantages of small pipe corridors are high cabin utilization and small size. To maximize the functions of small pipe corridors, they need to be uniformly deployed in combination with the pipeline conditions under local roads to avoid conflicts between pipe corridors and existing pipelines and waste of cabin space. Therefore, at the road level, it is necessary to further consider the stability of pipelines, the degree of pipeline chaos, and the recent pipeline renovation plan.

[0187] In some embodiments, the urban pipeline corridor planning method not only includes the above-mentioned S1 to S4, but also includes: determining a difference index according to the type of the urban pipeline corridor; adjusting the preset data model according to the difference index to obtain an adjusted data model, and calculating the first score, the second score and / or the third score based on the adjusted data model.

[0188] Specifically, according to the above description, different types of urban utility corridors have slightly different focuses. The preset data model is a relatively general model. The preset data model is further adjusted according to the type of urban utility corridor, so that the adjusted data model better matches the type of urban utility corridor, so that the scoring result is more accurate.

[0189] In some embodiments, the difference index refers to an evaluation index corresponding to the type of pipeline corridor that is different from other pipeline corridor types. For example, for a comprehensive pipeline corridor, the difference index may be at least one of GPD, construction and operation mechanism, construction cost-benefit, new construction area, underground space planning, pipeline demand, road grade, road underground space planning, frequency of excavation, and the degree of chaos of the existing pipelines. For a small pipeline corridor, the difference index may be at least one of the recent planning of roads, renewal areas, pipeline stability, pipeline chaos, and recent pipeline reconstruction plans. For a micro pipeline corridor, the difference index may be at least one of the frequency of natural disasters, the impact of natural disasters, renewal areas, and historical style areas. For a park pipeline corridor, the difference index takes more consideration of industrial parks.

[0190] In some embodiments, the urban utility corridor planning method further includes: optimizing the adjusted first score, the adjusted second score and / or the adjusted third score based on expert opinions.

[0191] Specifically, experts are randomly selected from the expert database for scoring, and the scoring results are counted. The data is analyzed and fitted to obtain a normal distribution curve. The mathematical expectation, that is, the score value after the optimization of this indicator, is obtained based on the normal distribution curve. If the expert scoring result cannot fit the normal distribution curve, experts are reselected and multiple rounds of comparison are performed. In this way, the accuracy of the scoring can be further improved, making the final urban pipeline corridor planning more accurate and in line with the actual situation.

[0192] The present disclosure adopts a hierarchical analysis method to analyze and study the comprehensive pipeline corridor planning method, and based on the research results, a set of scientific and objective comprehensive pipeline corridor planning and construction evaluation standards are obtained. The selection of indicators at each level in the present disclosure is the premise for constructing the entire evaluation system. By selecting the indicators (influencing parameters) that can most affect the comprehensive pipeline corridor planning method and forming a framework, an evaluation system is formed on this basis. The scoring standards for comprehensive pipeline corridor planning indicators at the city, district, and road levels in the present disclosure are the key to reflecting whether the entire evaluation system is objective and reasonable. By establishing a preset data model and performing a large amount of data calculation, a scoring system for indicators at all levels is obtained, and the scoring results are adjusted based on the type of urban pipeline corridor. Preferably, experts can also be invited to supplement and improve this system, and whether the obtained system meets the actual engineering situation again, and to apply and verify examples. Through the urban pipeline corridor planning method provided by the present disclosure, urban pipeline corridors can be objectively, reasonably and accurately planned.

[0193] On the second aspect, based on the same inventive concept, the disclosed embodiment also provides a device for planning an urban pipeline corridor.

[0194] Figure 3The structure block diagram of a city pipe corridor planning device 300 provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure, wherein the city pipe corridor planning is divided into first-level planning, second-level planning and third-level planning. Figure 3 As shown, the device 300 includes an acquisition module 301 , a first calculation module 302 , a second calculation module 303 and a third calculation module 304 .

[0195] Among them, the acquisition module 301 is used to obtain the influencing parameters of the urban pipeline corridor planning, and determine the type of the urban pipeline corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning.

[0196] The first calculation module 302 is used to calculate the first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter through a preset data model, adjust the first score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine a first result according to the adjusted first score.

[0197] The second calculation module 303 is used to calculate the second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjust the second score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine the second result according to the adjusted second score.

[0198] The third calculation module 304 is used to calculate the third score corresponding to the third-level planning according to the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, adjust the third score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor according to the adjusted third score.

[0199] In some embodiments, the first calculation module 302 includes a first calculation unit 312 and a first adjustment unit 322. The first calculation unit 312 is used to calculate the second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model. The first adjustment unit 322 is used to adjust the first score according to the GDP parameter, the construction and operation mechanism parameter, and the construction cost-benefit parameter in the first parameter if the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor; if the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro-utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the natural disaster frequency parameter and the natural disaster impact parameter in the first parameter.

[0200] In some embodiments, the second calculation module 303 includes a second calculation unit 313 and a second adjustment unit 323. The second calculation unit 313 is used to calculate the second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model. The second adjustment unit 323 is used to adjust the second score according to the new area parameters, underground space planning parameters and pipeline demand parameters in the second parameters if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a comprehensive pipeline corridor; if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a small pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the road short-term planning parameters and renewal area parameters in the second parameters; if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a micro-pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the renewal area parameters and historical style area parameters in the second parameters; if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a park pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the industrial area parameters in the second parameters.

[0201] In some embodiments, the third calculation module 304 includes a third calculation unit 314 and a third adjustment unit 324. The third calculation unit 314 is used to calculate the third score corresponding to the third level planning according to the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model. The third adjustment unit 324 is used to adjust the third score according to the road grade parameter, the road underground space planning parameter, the excavation frequency parameter, and the current pipeline chaos parameter in the third parameter if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a comprehensive pipeline corridor; if the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a small pipeline corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the pipeline stability parameter, the pipeline chaos parameter, and the recent pipeline renovation plan parameter in the third parameter.

[0202] In some embodiments, the first result includes: cities urgently in need of building pipeline corridors, cities that need to build pipeline corridors in the short term, and cities planned to build pipeline corridors; the second result includes: priority construction areas, suitable construction areas, appropriate construction areas, restricted construction areas, and cautious construction areas; the third result includes: preferred road construction, roads that need to be built, suitable roads to be built, roads that can be built, and no roads to be built for the time being.

[0203] In some embodiments, the device 300 further includes a determination module 305 and an optimization module 306. The determination module is used to determine a difference index according to the type of the urban utility tunnel. The optimization module 306 is used to adjust the preset data model according to the difference index to obtain an adjusted data model, and calculate the first score, the second score and / or the third score based on the adjusted data model.

[0204] It can be understood that the specific details of the planning device 300 provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure can refer to the specific details of the planning method embodiment of the first aspect above, and will not be repeated here.

[0205] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure further provides an electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the method described in any one of the first aspects is implemented.

[0206] Specifically, Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the physical structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure, such as Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device 004 includes a processor 401, a memory 402 and a bus 403. The processor 401 and the memory 402 communicate with each other via the bus 403.

[0207] The processor 401 is used to call the program instructions in the memory 402 to execute the methods provided by the above method embodiments.

[0208] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program of the method described in any one of the first aspects above.

[0209] In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a computer program product, comprising a computer program / instructions, which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of any one of the methods described in the first aspect above.

[0210] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the present disclosure may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present disclosure may take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Moreover, the present disclosure may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0211] The present disclosure is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that each process and / or box in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of the processes and / or boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0212] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture including an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0213] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A step that specifies a function in one or more boxes.

[0214] Specific embodiments are used in the present disclosure to illustrate the principles and implementation methods of the present disclosure. The description of the above embodiments is only used to help understand the method of the present disclosure and its core idea. At the same time, for those skilled in the art, according to the idea of ​​the present disclosure, there will be changes in the specific implementation methods and application scope. In summary, the content of this specification should not be understood as a limitation on the present disclosure.

Claims

1. A method for planning an urban pipeline corridor, characterized in that: The urban pipeline corridor planning is divided into first-level planning, second-level planning and third-level planning, and the method includes: Obtaining influencing parameters of the urban utility corridor planning, and determining the type of the urban utility corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning; Calculating a first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter through a preset data model, adjusting the first score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determining a first result according to the adjusted first score; Calculating a second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjusting the second score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determining a second result according to the adjusted second score; A third score corresponding to the third-level planning is calculated based on the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, and the third score is adjusted based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and a third result is determined based on the adjusted third score, and the final planning of the urban pipeline corridor is determined based on the third result.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The adjusting the first score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor includes: If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the GDP parameter, the construction and operation mechanism parameter, and the construction cost-benefit parameter in the first parameter; If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the first score is adjusted according to the natural disaster frequency parameter and the natural disaster impact parameter in the first parameter.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The adjusting the second score based on the type of the urban utility corridor includes: If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the newly built area parameter, underground space planning parameter and pipeline demand parameter in the second parameter; If the type of the urban utility corridor is a small utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the road short-term planning parameter and the renewal area parameter in the second parameter; If the type of the urban utility corridor is a micro utility corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the renewal area parameter and the historical style area parameter in the second parameter; If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a park pipeline corridor, the second score is adjusted according to the industrial zone parameter in the second parameter.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The adjusting the third score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor includes: If the type of the urban utility corridor is a comprehensive utility corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the road grade parameter, the road underground space planning parameter, the excavation frequency parameter, and the current pipeline chaos degree parameter in the third parameter; If the type of the urban pipeline corridor is a small pipeline corridor, the third score is adjusted according to the pipeline stability parameter, the pipeline chaos degree parameter, and the recent pipeline renovation plan parameter in the third parameter.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The first results include: cities that are in urgent need of building pipeline corridors, cities that need to build pipeline corridors in the short term, and cities that are planning to build pipeline corridors; The second result includes: priority construction area, suitable construction area, appropriate construction area, restricted construction area, and cautious construction area; The third results include: preferred road construction, road construction is needed, road construction is suitable, road construction is possible, and road construction is not temporarily planned.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method further comprises: Determine the difference index according to the type of the urban pipeline corridor; The preset data model is adjusted according to the difference index to obtain an adjusted data model, and the first score, the second score and / or the third score are calculated based on the adjusted data model.

7. An urban pipeline corridor planning device, characterized in that: The urban pipe gallery planning is divided into first-level planning, second-level planning and third-level planning, and the device includes: An acquisition device is used to acquire the influencing parameters of the urban utility corridor planning, and determine the type of the urban utility corridor according to the influencing parameters, wherein the influencing parameters include a first parameter corresponding to the first-level planning, a second parameter corresponding to the second-level planning, and a third parameter corresponding to the third-level planning; A first calculation module, configured to calculate a first score corresponding to the first-level planning according to the first parameter using a preset data model, adjust the first score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determine a first result according to the adjusted first score; a second calculation module, configured to calculate a second score corresponding to the second-level planning according to the first result and the second parameter through a preset data model, adjust the second score based on the type of the urban utility corridor, and determine a second result according to the adjusted second score; The third calculation module is used to calculate the third score corresponding to the third-level planning according to the second result and the third parameter through a preset data model, adjust the third score based on the type of the urban pipeline corridor, and determine the third result according to the adjusted third score, and finally plan the urban pipeline corridor according to the third result.

8. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the computer program, the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program for executing the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

10. A computer program product comprising a computer program / instructions, characterized in that When the computer program / instructions are executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images