Graph-digital-analog consistency verification method and system for power grid equipment assets, and terminal

Abstract

The invention discloses a graph-digital-analog consistency verification method and system for power grid equipment assets and a terminal, and relates to the technical field of power system maintenance, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining a re-verification list and a current power grid topological graph of a region corresponding to the re-verification list; based on the re-verification list, constructing an initial power grid topological graph corresponding to the re-verification list; overlapping and comparing the current power grid topological graph and the initial power grid topological graph to generate a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units; and taking the current power grid topological graph as a substrate, marking a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units, and generating a verification topological graph. The method and the device have the effect of improving the working efficiency of checking the updating content of the power grid by an operator.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of power system maintenance, and in particular to a method, system and terminal for verifying the consistency of graphics, digital and analogue images of power grid equipment assets. Background Art

[0002] With the continuous development of the power grid system, various electrical equipment are also constantly updating and iterating software and hardware. In order to manage and operate the power grid system more comprehensively and systematically, the management departments of various regional power grids have proposed a new concept of power grid management, namely "one map of the power grid", and have gradually implemented and improved it. One map of the power grid refers to the information of various equipment, lines, substations, etc. of the power grid, which is integrated in a graphical way to form a comprehensive, intuitive and dynamic view of the power grid. This graphical management method helps power grid operators better monitor, analyze and manage the power grid, and improve the operating efficiency and safety of the power grid.

[0003] Each time a large-scale update and iteration is not the first in the power grid, there is basically a change in equipment, parameters, connection relationship, or operation mode. The operator needs to virtualize the updated content into a specific unit in the power grid map and upload it to the corresponding position in the power grid map, so that the operator can monitor the operation status of the updated content through the power grid map at the workbench in the background of the power grid.

[0004] Generally speaking, operators need to reconstruct the grid topology map of the updated content according to the checklist, so that operators can check the equipment information. However, the newly constructed grid topology map is generated based on the updated content on the checklist, but the updated content of the grid systems in different regions has certain regionality. Therefore, the operator has certain limitations when using the reconstructed grid topology map as the current grid topology map, which reduces the operator's work efficiency. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to improve the work efficiency of operators in verifying the updated content of the power grid, the present application provides a method, system and terminal for verifying the consistency of the graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets.

[0006] In the first aspect, the present application provides a method for checking the consistency of a power grid equipment asset with respect to a graph, a digital model, and a simulation, using the following technical solution: A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analogue of power grid equipment assets, comprising: Obtaining a recheck list and a current power grid topology map of the area corresponding to the recheck list; Based on the recheck list, construct an initial power grid topology map corresponding to the recheck list; Overlapping and comparing the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map to generate a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units; Based on the current power grid topology map, a plurality of the difference units and a plurality of the similar units are marked to generate a verification topology map.

[0007] Through the above technical solution, the re-verification list includes the specific content of this update, such as the specific equipment updated, the specific location of the equipment, the area to which the equipment belongs, the changes in the connection relationship of the updated equipment, and the changes in operating parameters, etc. The current power grid topology map corresponding to the re-verification list refers to the basic layout structure diagram that is currently in operation, consisting of power grid nodes (such as power plants, substations, power loads, etc.) and the transmission lines and power equipment connected to them. Power grid operation and maintenance personnel can monitor the current power grid topology map in the background to perform simulation work such as flow calculation, fault diagnosis, and dynamic simulation, which is helpful for monitoring and analyzing the operating status of the power grid and improving the safety and reliability of power grid operation.

[0008] Based on the updated content and the most basic structural framework of the power grid system, an initial power grid topology corresponding to the re-verification list is generated (specific descriptions have been made in relevant patent documents and prior art, and will not be repeated here). The current power grid topology and the initial power grid topology are then overlapped and compared to generate multiple difference units (content with obvious differences) and multiple identical units (content without obvious differences), and the multiple difference units and multiple identical units are marked in the current power grid topology to generate a verification topology.

[0009] The operator synchronizes the verification topology map to the mobile terminal and uses the verification topology map to verify the updated content, which can highlight the different units and the similar units. Compared with the use of the reconstructed initial power grid topology map, the operator can perform verification more specifically, thereby improving the operator's work efficiency in verifying the updated content of the power grid.

[0010] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured such that after generating the verification topology map, the following processing steps are further included: After completing the verification according to the verification topology map, the verification result and the verification topology map are merged to form a topology map to be verified; Sending a review request for the topology map to be reviewed to the power grid backend; If the audit result of the audit request is passed, the verification result is uploaded to the current power grid topology map, and the current power grid topology map is updated.

[0011] Through the above technical solution, the operator comes to the equipment site and completes the verification of the updated content according to the verification topology map, and then merges the verification result with the verification topology map. Here, it can be understood as inputting the verification result into the verification topology map to form a topology map to be verified, and sending a review request for the topology map to be verified to the power grid background.

[0012] Since the verification topology map is generated based on the current power grid topology map, the resulting topology map to be verified has a higher degree of consistency with the current power grid topology map, and the audit pass rate is higher, which reduces the possibility of operators performing secondary verification.

[0013] The verification request for the topology map to be reviewed is directly uploaded to the current power grid topology map after the review is passed, and the current power grid topology map is updated to complete this verification.

[0014] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured such that after generating a plurality of difference units and a plurality of identical units, the following processing steps are further included: According to the connection relationship of the verification content, multiple connection hierarchical trees of the verification content are established; Based on the plurality of connection level trees, generating a plurality of sub-checklists, each of the sub-checklists comprising a plurality of the difference units and a plurality of the identical units; Calculating a complexity value of each of the sub-checklists based on the plurality of difference units included in the sub-checklists; Based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the plurality of sub-check lists, different check priorities are set for each of the sub-check lists.

[0015] Through the above technical solution, the connection relationship of the verification content refers to the connection relationship between the contents of this power grid update, which can be the connection between a certain device and other devices (such as signal reception and transmission), and multiple connection hierarchy trees of the verification content are established. The connection hierarchy tree refers to multiple connection-level auxiliary devices related to a certain device (for example, an intelligent feeder terminal can control the opening and closing of a pole-mounted circuit breaker, the opening and closing status of the pole-mounted circuit breaker, and the pole-mounted circuit breaker can be monitored by a monitoring device. Then, the above-mentioned intelligent feeder terminal, pole-mounted circuit breaker, and detection device are three levels of the connection hierarchy tree in sequence, and so on).

[0016] Based on multiple connection hierarchy trees, multiple sub-verification lists are generated. It can be understood here that a sub-verification list can include multiple connection hierarchy trees, which corresponds to multiple difference units. Then, by calculating the complexity value of the sub-verification list (representing the complexity of the connection relationship), the complexity of the verification content of the sub-verification list can be known. The higher the complexity, the larger the scope of the content of this power grid update, and the more it needs to be pre-verified. Therefore, the priority of the sub-verification list can be set according to the complexity value, that is, the larger the complexity value, the higher the verification priority of the corresponding sub-verification list.

[0017] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured such that the calculation of the complexity value of each of the sub-checklists includes the following processing steps: Setting different complex cardinalities for different levels of the connection level tree; The complexity value of each of the sub-check lists is calculated based on the complexity cardinality and the radiance value of each level of the connection level tree.

[0018] Through the above technical solution, the importance of power equipment at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree is different. For example, for the smart feeder terminal, the one that can control the opening and closing of the pole-mounted circuit breaker is itself at a relatively important level. The backup battery used to provide backup energy for the smart feeder terminal, although connected to the smart feeder terminal, is not absolutely important. Therefore, the backup battery is at a relatively lower level in the connection hierarchy tree (the specific level of the connection hierarchy tree where a certain device is located can be set in advance, or the relative connection hierarchy span between devices can be set).

[0019] Therefore, different complex cardinalities need to be set for devices at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree, which means that devices at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree have different importance. For example, at the first level, the complex cardinality is set to 5a, at the second level, the complex cardinality is set to 4a, and so on. Of course, the difference in the complex cardinalities of adjacent levels is not strictly an arithmetic decrease, and can be set and flexibly adjusted according to actual conditions.

[0020] Based on the complexity cardinality and the radiation value of each level of the connection hierarchy tree (the radiation value refers to the number of radiations between each device body and its subordinate adjacent connection relationships), the complexity value of each sub-verification list is calculated. According to the complexity value, the complexity of the sub-verification list can be analyzed, which makes it easier to set the verification priority.

[0021] In a preferred example, the present application may be further configured such that the complexity value of the sub-check list is calculated using the following formula: K=k 1 x a+k 2 ya+…+k nza Where K is the complexity value of the sub-check list, k 1 , k 2 , k n are the radiation values ​​of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, xa, ya, za are the complex cardinalities of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, x>y>z, the complex value of the sub-check list is the sum of the complex values ​​of the connection hierarchy tree corresponding to the difference units included in the sub-check list.

[0022] Through the above technical solution, the radiation value refers to the radiation number of each device body and its subordinate adjacent connection relationship. For the first level of the connection hierarchy tree, the radiation value k 1 The product of the complexity cardinality xa of the first level is the complexity value of the first level. Similarly, the sum of the complexity values ​​of multiple levels is the complexity value of this connected hierarchy tree. The sum of the complexity values ​​of multiple connected hierarchy trees included in the sub-check list is the complexity value of the sub-check list.

[0023] In a preferred example, the present application can be further configured as follows: based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the plurality of sub-check lists, different check priorities are set for each of the sub-check lists, including the following processing steps: If there are sub-check lists with equal complexity values, then calculating the total radiation value of the sub-check list corresponding to the connection level tree; The sub-verification list with the larger total radiation value is set as the sub-verification list to be checked first among the sub-verification lists with the same complexity value.

[0024] Through the above technical solution, generally speaking, the larger the total radiation value of the sub-verification list, the greater the connection depth between the updated device and other multi-level different devices, which means that the complexity of the sub-verification list is higher, so it needs to be verified first.

[0025] In a preferred example, the present application can be further configured such that the total radiation value is calculated using the following formula: D=k 1 +k 2 …+k n Where D is the total radiation value of the connected hierarchical tree, k n is the radiance value of the final level of the connection level tree, k 1 , k 2 , k n are the radiation values ​​of different levels of the connection level tree, and the total radiation value of the sub-verification list is the sum of the total radiation values ​​of multiple connection level trees included in the sub-verification list.

[0026] In the second aspect, based on the above-mentioned method for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of a power grid equipment asset, the present application provides a system for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of a power grid equipment asset, which adopts the following technical solution: A system for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analogue of power grid equipment assets, comprising: Information acquisition module: used to obtain the re-verification list and the current power grid topology map corresponding to the position of the re-verification list; A topology map construction module: used to construct an initial power grid topology map corresponding to the re-verification list; Overlap comparison module: used for performing overlap comparison between the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map, and generating a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units; Topology map construction module: used to generate verification topology map.

[0027] In a third aspect, the present application also provides an intelligent terminal, comprising a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores at least one instruction, at least one program, a code set or an instruction set, and the at least one instruction, the at least one program, the code set or the instruction set are loaded and executed by the processor to implement the processing of the method for verifying the digital-analog consistency of power grid equipment assets as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

[0028] In summary, this application includes the following beneficial technical effects: 1. Based on the current power grid topology map, the difference units and the same units generated by comparing the current power grid topology map with the initial power grid topology map are marked to generate a verification topology map, which can highlight the difference units and the same units. Compared with the reconstructed initial power grid topology map, the operator can perform content verification more targetedly, thereby improving the operator's work efficiency in verifying the updated content of the power grid; 2. Decompose the re-verification list into several sub-verification lists, and set different verification priorities for different sub-verification lists according to the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the sub-verification lists, so that the updated content can be verified in a reasonable processing order. If there is only one operator or a small team for verification, the verification will be carried out according to the verification priority. If there are multiple operators or multiple teams for verification, the sub-verification lists will be handed over to different personnel for verification, so as to make the verification order more reasonable; 3. By further refining the sorting logic of the verification priority (that is, when the complexity values ​​of the sub-verification lists are equal, the numerical values ​​of the total radiation values ​​are compared), the possibility of verification priority sorting disorder and system disorder due to equal complexity values ​​is reduced, thereby improving the stability and fluency of the system running this method. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0029] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for verifying the digital-analog consistency of power grid equipment assets according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0030] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the process of updating the current power grid topology diagram according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0031] Figure 3 It is a flowchart of setting the sub-check list verification priority according to an embodiment of the present application.

[0032] Figure 4 It is a flowchart of the calculation of complex values ​​of the example checklist of the embodiment of the present application.

[0033] Figure 5 It is a flowchart of refining the verification priority in an embodiment of the present application.

[0034] Figure 6 It is a structural diagram of the connection hierarchy tree of an embodiment of the present application.

[0035] Description of reference numerals: 1. Connection hierarchy tree; 11. First level; 12. Second level; 13. Nth level; 14. Schematic diagram of complex cardinality.

[0036] Attached Figure 6 In the example, the other levels between the second level and the nth level have been omitted. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0037] The following is combined with Figure 1 -Attached Figure 5 This application is described in further detail.

[0038] In the embodiments of the present application, a method, system and intelligent terminal for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets are disclosed. The execution subject of the method can be a system for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets, and the above-mentioned intelligent terminal can be used to carry the system for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets, and apply the method for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets.

[0039] See attached Figure 1 As shown, a method for checking the consistency of a graph, a digital model and an analog model of a power grid equipment asset includes: S101, obtaining a re-verification list and a current power grid topology map of an area corresponding to the re-verification list.

[0040] During implementation, the re-verification list includes the specific content of this update, such as the specific equipment updated, the specific location of the equipment, the area to which the equipment belongs, changes in the connection relationship of the updated equipment, changes in operating parameters, etc.

[0041] The current grid topology of the corresponding area of ​​the checklist is a basic layout diagram of the grid nodes (such as power plants, substations, power loads, etc.) and the transmission lines and power equipment connected to them, which are currently in operation. The current grid topology also includes information such as the connection relationship, port type, name and type of various resources. Grid operation and maintenance personnel can monitor the current grid topology in the background to perform simulation work such as flow calculation, fault diagnosis, and dynamic simulation, which is helpful for monitoring and analyzing the operation status of the grid and improving the safety and reliability of grid operation.

[0042] S102: Based on the re-verification list, construct an initial power grid topology map corresponding to the re-verification list.

[0043] During implementation, based on the updated content and the most basic structural framework of the power grid system, an initial power grid topology diagram corresponding to the re-verification list is generated (this has been specifically explained in relevant patent literature and prior art, and this content is not the specific interpretation object of this implementation and will not be repeated here).

[0044] The initial power grid topology map corresponding to the reconstructed re-verification list may be based on the updated content and the most basic structural framework of the power grid system, or may be constructed according to the basic units and composition logic of the current power grid topology map.

[0045] S103: Overlap and compare the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map to generate a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units.

[0046] In implementation, the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map are overlapped and compared. Here, it can be understood that the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map are based on the same plane, and the context and lines of the two maps are appropriately scaled and rearranged without affecting the connection relationship, so that the power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map have a certain degree of overlap, so that the obvious difference between the two can be further discovered, and multiple difference units (content with obvious differences) and multiple identical units (content without obvious differences) can be intuitively generated.

[0047] S104: Based on the current power grid topology map, a plurality of different units and a plurality of similar units are marked to generate a verification topology map.

[0048] In implementation, multiple difference units and multiple similar units are marked on a template based on the current power grid topology map. This can be understood as printing the current power grid topology map as the base, and marking the difference units and similar units to form a verification topology map.

[0049] The operator synchronizes the verification topology map to the mobile terminal (mobile workstation, notebook and other smart terminals) to verify the updated content with the verification topology map, which can highlight the difference units and the similar units. Compared with the use of the reconstructed initial power grid topology map, the operator can perform more targeted verification, thereby improving the operator's work efficiency in verifying the updated content of the power grid.

[0050] See attached Figure 2 As shown, after generating the verification topology diagram, the following processing steps are also included: S201, after completing verification according to the verification topology map, the verification result and the verification topology map are merged to form a topology map to be verified.

[0051] During implementation, after the operator completes the verification through the verification topology map, the verification result is input into the mobile terminal through the mobile terminal, and the system cooperates to complete the fusion of the verification result and the verification topology map to form a topology map to be reviewed, that is, the power grid topology map to be reviewed by the back-end staff. According to the review results of the back-end topology map to be reviewed, it is decided whether to conduct a secondary review or other corresponding adjustments.

[0052] S202: Send a request for review of the topology map to be reviewed to the power grid backend.

[0053] During implementation, the staff at the backend of the power grid will review the topology map to be verified, determine whether the verification result is compatible with the current power grid topology map, whether there is any confusion in the connection relationship of the updated content, etc.

[0054] S203: If the audit result of the audit request is passed, the verification result is uploaded to the current power grid topology map, and the current power grid topology map is updated.

[0055] In practice, since the verification topology map is generated based on the current power grid topology map, the resulting topology map to be verified has a higher degree of consistency with the current power grid topology map, and the audit pass rate is higher, which reduces the possibility of operators performing secondary verification.

[0056] The verification request for the topology map to be reviewed is directly uploaded to the current power grid topology map after the review is passed, and the current power grid topology map is updated to complete this verification.

[0057] See attached Figure 3 and attached Figure 6 As shown, after generating a plurality of difference units and a plurality of identical units, the following processing steps are also included: S301. Establish multiple connection hierarchical trees of the verification content according to the connection relationship of the verification content.

[0058] In implementation, the "connection relationship" referred to here refers to the connection relationship between the contents of this power grid update, which can be the connection between a certain device and other devices (such as signal reception and transmission), such as the connection relationship between an intelligent feeder terminal (which can be used to control the closing and opening of a pole-mounted circuit breaker) and a pole-mounted circuit breaker. Based on the connection relationship, a connection hierarchy tree of the connection relationship is established. For a simplified structural diagram of the hierarchy tree, please refer to the attached Figure 6 .

[0059] Attached Figure 6 The connection level tree shown in includes n levels, namely, the first level, the second level, ... the nth level. Assuming that the intelligent feeder terminal is at the first level, the pole-mounted circuit breaker is at the second level, and so on.

[0060] S302: Generate multiple sub-checklists based on multiple connection hierarchical trees, each sub-checklist including multiple difference units and multiple identical units.

[0061] In implementation, the sub-check list may include multiple difference units and multiple identical units, wherein each difference unit corresponds to a connection level tree, that is, each sub-check list may include multiple connection level trees.

[0062] S303: Calculate the complexity value of each sub-checklist based on the multiple difference units included in the sub-checklist.

[0063] The complexity value refers to the complexity of the equipment connection relationship. The larger the complexity value, the higher the complexity, which means that the scope of this power grid update is larger and the more it needs to be pre-checked.

[0064] In implementation, the complexity values ​​of the difference units are mainly calculated and compared. The complexity value of the connection level tree corresponding to each difference unit is calculated first, and then the complexity value of each connection level tree is accumulated to obtain the complexity value of the sub-check list (without considering the same units).

[0065] S304: Based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the multiple sub-check lists, set a different check priority for each sub-check list.

[0066] In implementation, the sub-checklist with a larger complexity value can be set to a higher priority, that is, the sub-checklist with a larger complexity value is checked first; and the sub-checklist with a smaller complexity value is set to a lower priority.

[0067] See attached Figure 4 and attached Figure 6 As shown, calculating the complexity value of each sub-checklist includes the following processing steps: S401. Setting different complex cardinalities for different levels of the connection hierarchy tree.

[0068] In practice, the importance of power equipment at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree is different. For example, the intelligent feeder terminal can control the opening and closing of the pole-mounted circuit breaker. The intelligent feeder terminal itself is at a relatively important level. The backup battery used to provide backup energy for the intelligent feeder terminal, although there is a connection relationship between the backup battery and the intelligent feeder terminal, is not absolutely important. Therefore, the backup battery is at a relatively lower level in the connection hierarchy tree (the specific level of a certain device in the connection hierarchy tree can be preset, and the relative connection level span between devices can also be set).

[0069] Therefore, different complex cardinalities need to be set for devices at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree, which means that devices at different levels on the connection hierarchy tree have different importance. For example, at the first level, the complex cardinality is set to 5a, at the second level, the complex cardinality is set to 4a, and so on. Of course, the difference in the complex cardinalities of adjacent levels is not strictly an arithmetic decrease, and can be set and flexibly adjusted according to actual conditions.

[0070] The importance of connecting different levels in the hierarchical tree is reflected in the huge cardinality, which is the coefficient in front of a, namely x, y, and z, which will be explained in detail later.

[0071] S402: Calculate the complexity value of each sub-checklist based on the complexity cardinality and the radiation value of each level of the connection level tree.

[0072] In practice, the radiation value refers to the number of basic units in the connection hierarchy tree or a certain level on the connection hierarchy tree, as shown in the following example. Figure 6 In the figure, each rectangle represents a basic unit (i.e., equipment). The first level has one basic unit, so the radiation quantity of the first level is 1xa; the second level has two basic units, so the radiation value of the second level is 2ya; the nth level has five basic units, so the radiation value of the nth level is 5za. The nth level here is assumed to be the last level of this connection hierarchy tree. The complexity value of this connection hierarchy tree is 1xa+2ya+…+5za=(1x+2y+5z)a. Finally, the complexity values ​​of the connection hierarchy tree of this sub-checklist are accumulated to obtain the complexity value of this sub-checklist.

[0073] See attached Figure 6 As shown, the complexity value of the sub-checklist is calculated using the following formula: K=k 1 x a+k 2 ya+…+k n za Among them, K is the complexity value of the sub-checklist, k 1, k 2 , k n are the radiation values ​​of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, xa, ya, za are the complex cardinalities of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, x, y, z are all positive integers, x>y>z, the complexity value of the sub-check list is the sum of the complexity values ​​of the connection hierarchy tree corresponding to the different units included in the sub-check list.

[0074] The radiation number of the first level is 1xa, the radiation value of the second level is 2ya, and the radiation value of the nth level is 5za. The complexity of this connection level tree is 1xa+2ya+…+5za=(1x+2y+5z)a. Finally, the complexity of the connection level tree of the sub-checklist is accumulated to get the complexity of the sub-checklist.

[0075] See attached Figure 5 and attached Figure 6 As shown, based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of multiple sub-check lists, different check priorities are set for each sub-check list, including the following processing steps: S501. If there are sub-check lists with equal complexity values, calculate the total radiation value of the connection level tree corresponding to the sub-check list.

[0076] During implementation, as the power grid system is continuously updated and expanded, there may be a large number of sub-verification lists with equal values. At this time, the setting logic of the verification priority is further improved, that is, the verification priority is determined according to the numerical value of the total radiation value of the connection hierarchy tree corresponding to the sub-verification list.

[0077] S502. Set the sub-verification list with the larger total radiation value as the sub-verification list to be checked first among the sub-verification lists with the same complexity value.

[0078] In practice, the greater the total radiation value of the sub-verification list, the greater the connection depth between the updated device and different devices at other levels, which means that the complexity of the sub-verification list is higher, so it needs to be verified first.

[0079] The total radiation value is calculated using the following formula: D=k 1 +k 2 …+k n Where D is the total radiation value of the connected hierarchical tree, k n is the radiance value of the final level of the connected hierarchy tree, k 1 , k 2 , k n To connect the radiation values ​​of different levels of the hierarchy tree, the total radiation value of the sub-verification list is the sum of the total radiation values ​​of multiple connected hierarchy trees included in the sub-verification list.

[0080] Based on the above-mentioned method for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets, the embodiment of the present application provides a system for checking the consistency of the image, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets, which adopts the following technical solution: A system for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analogue of power grid equipment assets, comprising: Information acquisition module: used to obtain the re-verification list and the current power grid topology map corresponding to the location of the re-verification list.

[0081] Topology map construction module: used to construct the initial power grid topology map corresponding to the re-verification list.

[0082] Overlap comparison module: used to compare the current power grid topology map with the initial power grid topology map and generate multiple difference units and multiple similar units.

[0083] Topology map construction module: used to generate verification topology map.

[0084] In addition, an embodiment of the present application also provides an intelligent terminal, which includes a processor and a memory, wherein the memory stores at least one instruction, at least one program, a code set or an instruction set, and the at least one instruction, at least one program, a code set or an instruction set is loaded and executed by the processor to implement the processing of the digital-analog consistency verification method for power grid equipment assets as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

[0085] The embodiments of this specific implementation method are all preferred embodiments of the present application, and are not intended to limit the protection scope of the present application in turn. Therefore, all equivalent changes made based on the structure, shape, and principle of the present application should be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining a recheck list and a current power grid topology map of the area corresponding to the recheck list; Based on the recheck list, construct an initial power grid topology map corresponding to the recheck list; Overlapping and comparing the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map to generate a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units; Based on the current power grid topology map, a plurality of the difference units and a plurality of the similar units are marked to generate a verification topology map.

2. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 1, characterized in that: After the verification topology diagram is generated, the following processing steps are also included: After completing the verification according to the verification topology map, the verification result and the verification topology map are merged to form a topology map to be verified; Sending a review request for the topology map to be reviewed to the power grid backend; If the audit result of the audit request is passed, the verification result is uploaded to the current power grid topology map, and the current power grid topology map is updated.

3. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 1, characterized in that: After generating a plurality of difference units and a plurality of identical units, the following processing steps are also included: According to the connection relationship of the verification content, multiple connection hierarchical trees of the verification content are established; Based on the plurality of connection level trees, generating a plurality of sub-checklists, each of the sub-checklists comprising a plurality of the difference units and a plurality of the identical units; Calculating a complexity value of each of the sub-checklists based on the plurality of difference units included in the sub-checklists; Based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the plurality of sub-check lists, different check priorities are set for each of the sub-check lists.

4. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 3, characterized in that: The calculation of the complexity value of each sub-check list includes the following processing steps: Setting different complex cardinalities for different levels of the connection level tree; The complexity value of each of the sub-check lists is calculated based on the complexity cardinality and the radiance value of each level of the connection level tree.

5. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 4, characterized in that: The complexity value of the sub-checklist is calculated using the following formula: K=k1xa+k2ya+…+k n for Where K is the complexity value of the sub-check list, k1, k2, k n are the radiation values ​​of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, xa, ya, za are the complex cardinalities of different levels of the connection hierarchy tree, x>y>z, the complex value of the sub-check list is the sum of the complex values ​​of the connection hierarchy tree corresponding to the difference units included in the sub-check list.

6. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 5, characterized in that: The step of setting a different verification priority for each sub-verification list based on the numerical values ​​of the complex values ​​of the plurality of sub-verification lists comprises the following processing steps: If there are sub-check lists with equal complexity values, then calculating the total radiation value of the sub-check list corresponding to the connection level tree; The sub-verification list with the larger total radiation value is set as the sub-verification list to be checked first among the sub-verification lists with the same complexity value.

7. A method for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analog of power grid equipment assets according to claim 6, characterized in that: The total radiation value is calculated using the following formula: D=k1+k2…+k n Where D is the total radiation value of the connected hierarchical tree, k n is the radiation value of the final level of the connection level tree, k1, k2, k n are the radiation values ​​of different levels of the connection level tree, and the total radiation value of the sub-verification list is the sum of the total radiation values ​​of multiple connection level trees included in the sub-verification list.

8. A system for checking the consistency of graphics, digital and analogue of power grid equipment assets, characterized in that: include: Information acquisition module: used to obtain the re-verification list and the current power grid topology map corresponding to the position of the re-verification list; A topology map construction module: used to construct an initial power grid topology map corresponding to the re-verification list; Overlap comparison module: used for performing overlap comparison between the current power grid topology map and the initial power grid topology map, and generating a plurality of difference units and a plurality of similar units; Topology map construction module: used to generate verification topology map.

9. An intelligent terminal, characterized in that: The intelligent terminal includes a processor and a memory, and the memory stores at least one instruction, at least one program, a code set or an instruction set. The at least one instruction, the at least one program, the code set or the instruction set is loaded and executed by the processor to implement the processing of the digital-analog consistency verification method for power grid equipment assets as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images