Method for evaluating practicability of landmark building construction scheme of giant dome cinema

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the practicability of a landmark building construction scheme of a giant dome cinema, and the method achieves the evaluation of the scheme from the three aspects of construction delay, economic benefits and environmental pollution through the combination of the content of the scheme and the region where a building is located. According to the method, a construction evaluation index, an economic evaluation index and an environmental influence index corresponding to a current construction scheme are obtained, weighted calculation is carried out on the construction evaluation index, the economic evaluation index and the environmental influence index, construction, economic and environmental factors are comprehensively considered, an overall evaluation index is obtained, and according to the value range of the overall evaluation index, the evaluation result is obtained. According to the method, different practicability grades are preset, and after the different practicability grades are matched with the preset index value range of each group, the practicability grade of the construction scheme is determined, so that the problem that the region and the position of the landmark building of the giant dome cinema are not considered in the prior art is solved; and the problems of multiple dimensions of economic benefit, construction periodicity and environmental influence of the current construction scheme are comprehensively analyzed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of building assessment, and in particular to a feasibility assessment method for a construction plan of a giant dome cinema landmark building. Background Art

[0002] With the acceleration of urbanization, landmark buildings have become an important part of the city's image. As a new type of entertainment facility, the feasibility evaluation of the construction plan of the giant dome theater is crucial to ensure the success of the project.

[0003] However, the evaluation methods in the prior art still have the following deficiencies: They often lack systematicity and foresight, and it is difficult to fully reflect the feasibility and potential risks of the construction plan. They do not take into account the location and position of the giant dome theater landmark building, and do not comprehensively analyze the economic benefits, construction cycle and environmental impact of the current construction plan in multiple dimensions to achieve a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the construction plan. They are limited and singular; At the same time, when experts were evaluating the construction plan of the giant dome theater landmark building, the professionalism and experience of the experts were not taken into consideration, resulting in the accuracy of the evaluation results not being guaranteed.

[0004] Therefore, a feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome cinema landmark building is proposed. Summary of the invention

[0005] In view of this, the present invention provides a feasibility assessment method for a giant dome theater landmark building construction plan to solve the problems raised by the above background technology.

[0006] The purpose of the present invention can be achieved by the following technical solution: A feasibility assessment method for a giant dome theater landmark building construction plan, comprising: Construction analysis: Analyze the surrounding environment of the construction site of the giant dome theater landmark building, and obtain the construction evaluation index Pa of the scheme; the surrounding environment includes preliminary construction days and traffic flow data; Economic evaluation: Obtain the economic benefit scores and expert evaluation parameters of the current construction plan from each expert, and conduct a comprehensive analysis to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan; expert evaluation parameters include education level, length of employment, and professional awards received; Environmental assessment: Extract detailed information about construction activities from the construction plan of the landmark building of the giant dome theater; based on the evaluation results of the detailed information, obtain the environmental impact index Pc of the plan; the detailed information includes various construction equipment and the specifications of each construction equipment; Comprehensive evaluation: Based on the construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, the overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is obtained, and the feasibility of the current construction plan is evaluated based on the overall evaluation index req.

[0007] In some embodiments, the environment surrounding the construction location of the giant dome theater landmark building is analyzed, specifically: Extract the preliminary construction days from the construction plan of the landmark building of the giant dome theater; collect traffic flow data within a set distance around the construction location, and obtain traffic flow data for the past seven days; after obtaining the traffic flow data for the past seven days, divide the traffic flow data for each day of the past seven days into time periods, and extract the vehicle flow and pedestrian flow data for each divided time period of each day of the past seven days; Preset the flow value ranges of each group of vehicle flow and pedestrian flow respectively, set the flow value range of each group of vehicle flow to correspond to a vehicle flow impact value, and set the flow value range of each group of pedestrian flow to correspond to a pedestrian impact value; The vehicle flow and pedestrian flow in each divided time period of each day in the past seven days are matched with the corresponding flow value ranges of each group, thereby obtaining the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value of each divided time period of each day in the past seven days; Preset weight coefficients of vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value, multiply the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value in each segmented time period by the corresponding weight coefficients, and then sum them up to obtain the construction impact value of each segmented time period; The maximum permissible value of the preset construction impact value is set; the construction impact values ​​corresponding to each divided time period in each of the past seven days are compared with the preset maximum permissible value one by one, and the divided time periods in which the construction impact values ​​are lower than the preset maximum permissible value are extracted as the construction time of the giant dome cinema landmark building.

[0008] In some embodiments, the construction evaluation index Pa of the scheme is obtained, specifically: Based on the construction time of each section in the past seven days, the sum of the construction time of each section is taken as the available construction time of the giant dome theater landmark building in the past seven days; The preliminary construction days of the current construction plan are converted into hours based on the daily construction time, and after the conversion is completed, it is divided by the available construction time of the past seven days to obtain the estimated number of weeks for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, and the estimated number of weeks is multiplied by 7, and the estimated number of weeks is rounded off to obtain the estimated number of construction days required for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; The ratio of the estimated construction days required for the construction of the giant dome cinema landmark building to the preliminary construction days is calculated, and the calculated ratio is used as the construction evaluation index Pa of the current giant dome cinema landmark building construction plan.

[0009] In some embodiments, the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan by each expert are obtained and a comprehensive analysis is performed, specifically: A deadline for expert evaluation is set, and the set deadline is integrated with the construction plan of the giant dome cinema landmark building and sent to the mobile terminals of each expert. After the set deadline is reached, the economic benefit scores of each expert on the current construction plan are extracted; After extracting the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan from each expert, an information acquisition instruction is sent to each expert at the same time. Each expert receives the sent information acquisition instruction and confirms it. After confirmation, the expert information of each expert is obtained; the expert information includes educational background, length of employment, and professional awards; The educational qualifications of the experts are obtained from the educational background of each expert, and different educational qualifications are set to correspond to an education added value; the educational qualifications of each expert are matched with each set group of education added values ​​to obtain the education added value of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the length of service of each expert, preset the value ranges of each group of years corresponding to the length of service, set each group of years value range to correspond to an added value of service, match the length of service of each expert with the preset value ranges of each group of years, so as to obtain the added value of service of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the titles of the professional awards won by each expert, set a gold content score corresponding to each award, match the titles of the professional awards won by each expert with the corresponding gold content score, and after the matching is completed, add up the gold content scores of each group of experts, and use the accumulated results as the professional added value of each expert in evaluating the current construction plan.

[0010] In some embodiments, the economic evaluation index Pb of the scheme is obtained, specifically: The education added value, employment added value and professional added value of each expert are marked as e1, e2 and e3 respectively. The education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 of each expert are weighted to obtain the expert evaluation index ma of each expert; a1, a2 and a3 are the influence weight factors of the education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 respectively; The expert evaluation index ma of each group is sorted from small to large, and the top three experts in the expert evaluation index ma are extracted. The economic benefit scores of these three experts on the current construction plan are obtained, and the average of the three groups of economic benefit scores is taken to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan.

[0011] In some embodiments, based on the evaluation results of the detailed information, the environmental impact index Pc of the scheme is obtained, specifically: List all construction equipment from the detailed information of construction activities; obtain the specifications of each construction equipment; Based on the specifications of each construction equipment, the emission factor of each construction equipment is obtained, that is, the amount of pollutants emitted per unit time; the estimated use time of each construction equipment in each construction stage is extracted from the detailed information of the construction activities, and the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage are calculated based on the estimated use time and estimated use time of each construction equipment; that is, the pollutant amounts of each construction equipment in each construction stage are accumulated to obtain the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage; The estimated pollutant emissions at each construction stage are summarized to obtain the total estimated emissions of the scheme during the construction period; A reference threshold for the total estimated emissions is preset; the total estimated emissions of the scheme in the construction period are calculated to be ratioed to the preset reference threshold, i.e., the total estimated emissions / preset reference threshold are calculated, and the calculated ratio is used as the environmental impact index Pc of the scheme.

[0012] In some embodiments, the overall evaluation index req of the giant dome theater landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is obtained, specifically: According to the formula The construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the current construction plan are weighted and calculated to obtain the overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical theater landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; , as well as They represent the highest allowable construction assessment index, the lowest allowable economic assessment index, and the highest allowable environmental impact index, respectively; , as well as They are the influencing weight factors of construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc respectively.

[0013] In some embodiments, the feasibility of the current construction plan is evaluated based on the overall evaluation index req, specifically: The value ranges of each group of indexes of the preset overall evaluation index req are set, and each group of index value ranges is set to correspond to a practicability level; the higher the overall evaluation index req is, the lower the corresponding practicability level is; the overall evaluation index req of the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is matched with the preset value ranges of each group of indexes, so as to obtain the practicability level of the current construction plan.

[0014] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects: The present invention evaluates the scheme from three perspectives, namely, construction delay, economic benefit and environmental pollution, by combining the scheme content and the area where the building is located, thereby obtaining the construction evaluation index, economic evaluation index and environmental impact index corresponding to the current construction scheme, performing weighted calculation on the construction evaluation index, economic evaluation index and environmental impact index, comprehensively considering construction, economic and environmental factors, and obtaining the overall evaluation index. According to the value range of the overall evaluation index, different practicability levels are preset, and after matching with the preset value ranges of each group of indexes, the practicability level of the construction scheme is determined, which solves the problem that the existing technology does not consider the area and position of the giant dome theater landmark building, and comprehensively analyzes the economic benefit, construction periodicity and environmental impact of the current construction scheme in multiple dimensions; The present invention attaches importance to the professionalism and experience of experts in the evaluation process, obtains the experts' educational qualifications, length of service and professional awards, and converts them into added values ​​for weighted calculation of the expert evaluation index. The average score of the top three experts in the expert evaluation index is taken as the economic evaluation index, thereby improving the professionalism and accuracy of the evaluation results. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] Further details, features and advantages of the present application are disclosed in the following description of exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] Several embodiments of the present application will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art can implement the present application. The present application can be embodied in many different forms and purposes and should not be limited to the embodiments described herein. These embodiments are provided to make the present application comprehensive and complete, and to fully convey the scope of the present application to those skilled in the art. The embodiments do not limit the present application.

[0017] Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. It will be further understood that terms such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the relevant art and / or the context of this specification, and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless explicitly defined as such herein.

[0018] See also Figure 1 As shown in the figure, the feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of the giant dome theater landmark building includes: Construction analysis: Analyze the surrounding environment of the construction location of the giant dome theater landmark building, and obtain the construction evaluation index Pa of the scheme; Specifically: Extract the preliminary construction days from the construction plan of the giant dome theater landmark building; the project team and the construction party jointly determine the preliminary construction days, including the construction time per day, based on factors such as the project scale, construction process, required materials and labor; Collect traffic flow data within a set distance around the construction location and obtain traffic flow data for the past seven days; after obtaining the traffic flow data for the past seven days, divide the traffic flow data for each day of the past seven days into time periods, and extract the vehicle flow and pedestrian flow data for each divided time period of each day of the past seven days; obtain through a traffic monitoring system or on-site investigation; Preset the flow value ranges of each group of vehicle flow and pedestrian flow respectively, set the flow value range of each group of vehicle flow to correspond to a vehicle flow impact value, and set the flow value range of each group of pedestrian flow to correspond to a pedestrian impact value; The vehicle flow and pedestrian flow in each divided time period of the past seven days are matched with the corresponding flow value ranges of each group, thereby obtaining the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value of each divided time period of the past seven days; the higher the vehicle flow and pedestrian flow, the greater the corresponding matching impact value; Preset weight coefficients of vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value, multiply the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value in each segmented time period by the corresponding weight coefficients, and then sum them up to obtain the construction impact value of each segmented time period; The maximum permissible value of the preset construction impact value; the maximum permissible value indicates that construction can be carried out in the construction area during the period when the construction impact value is lower than the maximum permissible value; The construction impact values ​​corresponding to each segmented time period in the past seven days are compared with the preset maximum allowable values ​​one by one, and the segmented time periods with construction impact values ​​lower than the preset maximum allowable values ​​are extracted as the construction time of the giant dome cinema landmark building; Based on the construction time of each section in the past seven days, the sum of the construction time of each section is taken as the available construction time of the giant dome theater landmark building in the past seven days; The preliminary construction days of the current construction plan are converted into hours based on the daily construction time, and after the conversion is completed, it is divided by the available construction time of the past seven days to obtain the estimated number of weeks for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, and the estimated number of weeks is multiplied by 7, and the estimated number of weeks is rounded off to obtain the estimated number of construction days required for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; In this process, the estimated number of construction days is multiplied by the impact value of unexpected factors and rounded off. The impact value of unexpected factors represents the construction delay caused by rainy, foggy and other weather conditions that may be encountered in the future construction process. It is set by technical personnel based on future weather forecast information in the construction area; the impact value of unexpected factors is greater than 1; Calculate the ratio of the estimated construction days required for the construction of the giant dome cinema landmark building to the preliminary construction days, and use the calculated ratio as the construction evaluation index Pa of the current giant dome cinema landmark building construction plan; The larger the construction assessment index Pa is, the greater the degree of delay in the construction process of the current giant dome theater landmark building construction plan; It should be noted that, in summary, by analyzing the traffic flow data at the construction location of the giant dome theater landmark building and combining it with the construction restrictions in the area, a reasonable construction time is obtained. A comprehensive evaluation is conducted based on the reasonable construction time and the initial construction days determined in the plan. The evaluation results can reflect the degree of difference between the current construction plan and the expectations during the actual construction process.

[0019] Economic evaluation: Obtain the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan from experts and conduct a comprehensive analysis to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan; Specifically: A deadline for expert evaluation is set, and the set deadline is integrated with the construction plan of the giant dome cinema landmark building and sent to the mobile terminals of each expert. After the set deadline is reached, the economic benefit score of each expert on the current construction plan is extracted; the economic benefit score range is set at 60-100, and the higher the economic benefit score, the higher the estimated economic benefit of the plan; The experts are mainly analysts with a financial and market background; After extracting the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan from each expert, an information acquisition instruction is sent to each expert at the same time. Each expert receives the sent information acquisition instruction and confirms it. After confirmation, the expert information of each expert is obtained. Expert information includes educational background, length of experience, and professional awards; Obtain the educational qualifications of the experts from their educational backgrounds, and set different educational qualifications to correspond to an education added value; educational qualifications include bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees; Match the educational qualifications of each expert with the set educational added values ​​of each group to obtain the educational added value of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the length of service of each expert, preset the value ranges of each group of years corresponding to the length of service, set each group of years value range to correspond to an added value of service, match the length of service of each expert with the preset value ranges of each group of years, so as to obtain the added value of service of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the names of the professional awards won by each expert, set a gold content score corresponding to each award, match the names of the professional awards won by each expert with the corresponding gold content score, and after the matching is completed, add up the gold content scores of each expert group, and use the accumulated results as the professional added value of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; The education added value, employment added value and gold content score ranges are all set at 1-5, which are set by technical personnel and can be dynamically adjusted according to actual conditions; The education added value, employment added value and professional added value of each expert are marked as e1, e2 and e3 respectively. The education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 of each expert are weighted to obtain the expert evaluation index ma of each expert; a1, a2 and a3 are the influence weight factors of the education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 respectively; Sort the expert evaluation index ma of each group from small to large, extract the top three experts in the expert evaluation index ma, and obtain the economic benefit scores of the three experts on the current construction plan. Take the average of the three groups of economic benefit scores to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan; It should be noted that, in summary, by sending the construction plan to the experts, a comprehensive, in-depth and reliable economic benefit evaluation is provided for the construction plan of the giant dome theater landmark building. At the same time, in this process, the expert evaluation index is calculated by weighted calculation, and the average score of the top three experts in the expert evaluation index is taken as the economic evaluation index, which improves the professionalism and objectivity of the evaluation.

[0020] Before sending the construction plan to each expert's mobile terminal, each expert is required to sign a confidentiality agreement to avoid leakage of the plan content.

[0021] Environmental assessment: Extract detailed information about construction activities from the construction plan of the landmark building of the giant dome theater; the detailed information includes the construction method and the machinery and equipment used; based on the evaluation results of the detailed information, obtain the environmental impact index Pc of the plan; Specifically: List all construction equipment from detailed information of construction activities; construction equipment includes excavators, cranes, concrete mixers, etc.; obtain specifications of each construction equipment; including engine type, power, and emission standards; Obtain the emission factor of each construction equipment based on its specifications, that is, the amount of pollutants emitted per unit time; provided by the equipment manufacturer or environmental protection agency; The estimated use time of each construction equipment in each construction stage is extracted from the detailed information of the construction activities, and the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage are calculated based on the estimated use time and estimated use time of each construction equipment; that is, the pollutant emissions of each construction equipment in each construction stage are accumulated to obtain the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage; The estimated pollutant emissions at each construction stage are summarized to obtain the total estimated emissions of the scheme during the construction period; A reference threshold for the total estimated emissions is preset; it is set according to the air quality standards of the area where the landmark building of the giant dome theater is located; The total estimated emissions of the scheme in the construction period are calculated by ratio with the preset reference threshold, that is, the total estimated emissions / preset reference threshold are calculated, and the calculated ratio is used as the environmental impact index Pc of the scheme; It should be noted that the above analysis of the possible pollutant emissions caused by the plan provides an in-depth and reliable environmental impact assessment for the construction plan of the giant dome theater landmark building.

[0022] Comprehensive evaluation: Based on the construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, the overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is obtained, and the feasibility of the current construction plan is evaluated based on the overall evaluation index req; Specifically: According to the formula The construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the current construction plan are weighted and calculated to obtain the overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical theater landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; , as well as Respectively represent the highest allowable construction assessment index, the lowest allowable economic assessment index and the highest allowable environmental impact index; preset by technical personnel; , as well as They are the impact weight factors of construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc; Preset the value ranges of each group of indexes of the overall evaluation index req, and set each group of index value ranges to correspond to a practicability level; the higher the overall evaluation index req, the lower the corresponding practicability level; match the overall evaluation index req of the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan with the preset value ranges of each group of indexes, so as to obtain the practicability level of the current construction plan; It should be noted that the above-mentioned combination of the three evaluation indexes of construction, economy and environment provides a multi-dimensional evaluation perspective, and further provides a quantitative judgment standard for the feasibility of the plan through the setting of feasibility levels, and helps guide the project team to continuously improve the plan.

[0023] The above formulas are obtained by collecting a large amount of data and performing software simulation, and a formula close to the actual value is selected. The influencing weight factor and specific coefficient value in the formula are set by technical personnel in this field according to actual conditions, and can be adjusted and modified later.

[0024] The preferred embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are only used to help explain the present invention. The preferred embodiments do not describe all the details in detail, nor do they limit the invention to only specific implementation methods. Obviously, many modifications and changes can be made according to the content of this specification. This specification selects and specifically describes these embodiments in order to better explain the principles and practical applications of the present invention, so that those skilled in the art can understand and use the present invention well. The present invention is limited only by the claims and their full scope and equivalents.

Claims

1. A feasibility assessment method for a landmark building construction plan for a giant dome theater, characterized in that: include: Construction analysis: Analyze the surrounding environment of the construction site of the giant dome theater landmark building, and obtain the construction evaluation index Pa of the scheme; the surrounding environment includes preliminary construction days and traffic flow data; Economic evaluation: Obtain the economic benefit scores and expert evaluation parameters of the current construction plan from each expert, and conduct a comprehensive analysis to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan; expert evaluation parameters include education level, length of employment, and professional awards received; Environmental assessment: Extract detailed information about construction activities from the construction plan of the landmark building of the giant dome theater; based on the evaluation results of the detailed information, obtain the environmental impact index Pc of the plan; the detailed information includes various construction equipment and the specifications of each construction equipment; Comprehensive evaluation: Based on the construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, the overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is obtained, and the feasibility of the current construction plan is evaluated based on the overall evaluation index req.

2. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The surrounding environment of the construction site of the giant dome cinema landmark building is analyzed, specifically: Extract the preliminary construction days from the construction plan of the landmark building of the giant dome theater; collect traffic flow data within a set distance around the construction location, and obtain traffic flow data for the past seven days; after obtaining the traffic flow data for the past seven days, divide the traffic flow data for each day of the past seven days into time periods, and extract the vehicle flow and pedestrian flow data for each divided time period of each day of the past seven days; Preset the flow value ranges of each group of vehicle flow and pedestrian flow respectively, set the flow value range of each group of vehicle flow to correspond to a vehicle flow impact value, and set the flow value range of each group of pedestrian flow to correspond to a pedestrian impact value; The vehicle flow and pedestrian flow in each divided time period of each day in the past seven days are matched with the corresponding flow value ranges of each group, thereby obtaining the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value of each divided time period of each day in the past seven days; Preset weight coefficients of vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value, multiply the vehicle flow impact value and pedestrian impact value in each segmented time period by the corresponding weight coefficients, and then sum them up to obtain the construction impact value of each segmented time period; The maximum permissible value of the preset construction impact value is set; the construction impact values ​​corresponding to each divided time period in each of the past seven days are compared with the preset maximum permissible value one by one, and the divided time periods in which the construction impact values ​​are lower than the preset maximum permissible value are extracted as the construction time of the giant dome cinema landmark building.

3. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The construction evaluation index Pa of the scheme is obtained, specifically: Based on the construction time of each section in the past seven days, the sum of the construction time of each section is taken as the available construction time of the giant dome theater landmark building in the past seven days; The preliminary construction days of the current construction plan are converted into hours based on the daily construction time, and after the conversion is completed, it is divided by the available construction time of the past seven days to obtain the estimated number of weeks for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan, and the estimated number of weeks is multiplied by 7, and the estimated number of weeks is rounded off to obtain the estimated number of construction days required for the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; The ratio of the estimated construction days required for the construction of the giant dome cinema landmark building to the preliminary construction days is calculated, and the calculated ratio is used as the construction evaluation index Pa of the current giant dome cinema landmark building construction plan.

4. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Obtain the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan from various experts and conduct a comprehensive analysis, specifically: A deadline for expert evaluation is set, and the set deadline is integrated with the construction plan of the giant dome cinema landmark building and sent to the mobile terminals of each expert. After the set deadline is reached, the economic benefit scores of each expert on the current construction plan are extracted; After extracting the economic benefit scores of the current construction plan from each expert, an information acquisition instruction is sent to each expert at the same time. Each expert receives the sent information acquisition instruction and confirms it. After confirmation, the expert information of each expert is obtained; the expert information includes educational background, length of employment, and professional awards; The educational qualifications of the experts are obtained from the educational background of each expert, and different educational qualifications are set to correspond to an education added value; the educational qualifications of each expert are matched with each set group of education added values ​​to obtain the education added value of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the length of service of each expert, preset the value ranges of each group of years corresponding to the length of service, set each group of years value range to correspond to an added value of service, match the length of service of each expert with the preset value ranges of each group of years, so as to obtain the added value of service of each expert when evaluating the current construction plan; Extract the titles of the professional awards won by each expert, set a gold content score corresponding to each award, match the titles of the professional awards won by each expert with the corresponding gold content score, and after the matching is completed, add up the gold content scores of each group of experts, and use the accumulated results as the professional added value of each expert in evaluating the current construction plan.

5. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The economic evaluation index Pb of the scheme is obtained as follows: The education added value, employment added value and professional added value of each expert are marked as e1, e2 and e3 respectively. The education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 of each expert are weighted to obtain the expert evaluation index ma of each expert; a1, a2 and a3 are the influence weight factors of the education added value e1, employment added value e2 and professional added value e3 respectively; The expert evaluation index ma of each group is sorted from small to large, and the top three experts in the expert evaluation index ma are extracted. The economic benefit scores of these three experts on the current construction plan are obtained, and the average of the three groups of economic benefit scores is taken to obtain the economic evaluation index Pb of the plan.

6. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Based on the evaluation results of the detailed information, the environmental impact index Pc of the scheme is obtained, which is: List all construction equipment from the detailed information of construction activities; obtain the specifications of each construction equipment; Based on the specifications of each construction equipment, the emission factor of each construction equipment is obtained, that is, the amount of pollutants emitted per unit time; the estimated use time of each construction equipment in each construction stage is extracted from the detailed information of the construction activities, and the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage are calculated based on the estimated use time and estimated use time of each construction equipment; that is, the pollutant amounts of each construction equipment in each construction stage are accumulated to obtain the estimated pollutant emissions in each construction stage; The estimated pollutant emissions at each construction stage are summarized to obtain the total estimated emissions of the scheme during the construction period; Preset reference thresholds for total estimated emissions; The ratio of the total estimated emissions of the scheme in the construction period to the preset reference threshold is calculated, that is, the total estimated emissions / preset reference threshold is calculated, and the calculated ratio is used as the environmental impact index Pc of the scheme.

7. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The overall evaluation index req of the giant spherical theater landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is obtained, specifically: According to the formula The construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc of the current construction plan are weighted and calculated to obtain the overall evaluation index req of the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan; , as well as They represent the highest allowable construction assessment index, the lowest allowable economic assessment index, and the highest allowable environmental impact index, respectively; , as well as They are the influencing weight factors of construction evaluation index Pa, economic evaluation index Pb and environmental impact index Pc respectively.

8. The feasibility assessment method for the construction plan of a giant dome theater landmark building according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The feasibility of the current construction plan is evaluated based on the overall evaluation index req, specifically: The value ranges of each group of indexes of the preset overall evaluation index req are set, and each group of index value ranges is set to correspond to a practicability level; the higher the overall evaluation index req is, the lower the corresponding practicability level is; the overall evaluation index req of the giant dome cinema landmark building corresponding to the current construction plan is matched with the preset value ranges of each group of indexes, so as to obtain the practicability level of the current construction plan.

Images