Security policy analysis method based on multi-technology fusion
Through the security policy analysis method of multi-technology integration, security policy information is collected and organized, security policy information is classified and weighted, security policy books are generated and updated regularly, solving the problem of the lack of integrity and systemicity of existing security policy analysis methods, and efficient and reliable security policy management is achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202510032121.2
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-01-09
- Publication Date
- 2025-03-28
AI Technical Summary
The existing security strategy analysis methods lack integrity and systemicity, are difficult to deal with diversified and complex security threats, and face challenges such as data quality and model accuracy.
The security policy analysis method of multi-technology integration is adopted to collect and organize information related to security policy, classify and summarize, and perform weighted calculations to determine importance and priorities, generate security policy books, and regularly evaluate and update to adapt to changes in the security environment.
It improves the accuracy and completeness of security policies, realizes scientific classification and priority sorting, enhances the implementation effect and adaptability of security policies, and improves the systematicity and standardization of information security management.
Smart Images
Figure CN119721496A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention belongs to the field of data analysis, and more specifically, particularly relates to a security strategy analysis method integrating multiple technologies. Background Art
[0002] With the rapid development of information technology, enterprises and organizations are facing increasingly complex security threats. Traditional single technical means are no longer able to cope with diverse and highly dynamic security challenges. Therefore, a multi-technical security policy analysis method has emerged. This method systematically analyzes and evaluates security policies by comprehensively using multiple technical means to achieve more effective security management.
[0003] Existing traditional security strategies often focus on a specific area and lack integrity and systematicness. A single security measure is difficult to cope with diverse and complex security threats. In the process of formulating and implementing security strategies, there is a lack of effective evaluation and optimization mechanisms. With the development of technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence, security strategy analysis methods are also constantly innovating and improving. Some data-driven and model-driven security strategy analysis methods have emerged, which can more accurately assess security risks and formulate security measures. However, these methods still face challenges in data quality and model accuracy.
[0004] In summary, we propose a multi-technology integrated security policy analysis method, which integrates multiple technologies and means to achieve a comprehensive analysis and effective response to security threats. This method can not only improve the accuracy and completeness of security policies, but also dynamically adjust and optimize according to changes in the security environment, providing organizations with more reliable and efficient security protection. Summary of the invention
[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to solve the shortcomings existing in the prior art, and to propose a security policy analysis method that integrates multiple technologies. Through the method of multiple technology integration, it is possible to more comprehensively collect and organize security policy related information, including not only the goals, scope, and measures of the security policy, but also data from different sources. Through information classification and review, the accuracy and completeness of the security policy are ensured.
[0006] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
[0007] A multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method includes the following steps:
[0008] S1. Collect and organize information related to security policies, including the objectives, scope, and measures of security policies;
[0009] S2. Classify and summarize security policies to form different security policy categories;
[0010] S3. Perform weighted calculation on each security policy category to determine its importance and priority;
[0011] S4. Generate a security policy document based on the weighted calculation results, clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and review and modify the security policy document to ensure its accuracy and completeness;
[0012] S5. Submit the security policy to relevant departments or personnel for implementation and supervision, and regularly evaluate and update the security policy to adapt to changes in the security environment.
[0013] Preferably, step S1 collects and organizes security policy related information, including:
[0014] S11. Identify and collect information sources through internal document inspection, integrated technical system analysis data, employee interviews, and external industry resources;
[0015] S12. Classify and organize information. Classify the collected security policy information by category. Write a brief summary of each security policy, outlining its core content and key points. Create an index for each type of security policy to facilitate subsequent retrieval and reference.
[0016] S13, Information review: Verify the accuracy and completeness of security policies by comparing information from different sources, manually review the collated security policy information, propose modification suggestions, and revise and improve the security policy information based on the review suggestions;
[0017] S14. Information storage: Store the organized security policy information in a secure database to ensure data security and accessibility, and develop a backup strategy to ensure rapid recovery in the event of data loss or damage.
[0018] Preferably, the specific process of step S2 is:
[0019] S21. Determine the classification standard of the security policy, which is based on multiple dimensions such as the goal, scope, implementation object, and technical means of the security policy;
[0020] S22. Preliminarily classify the collected security policy information according to the determined classification standard. On the basis of the preliminary classification, summarize the policies under each category, find out the commonalities and differences, and form a policy framework for each category.
[0021] S23. Define clear names and descriptions for each security policy category, ensuring that the connotation and extension of each category are clear;
[0022] The determined classification criteria include the objectives, scope, implementation objects, and technical means of the security policy, and each policy is manually reviewed to determine its most appropriate category.
[0023] Preferably, step S3 specifically comprises:
[0024] S31. Determine weighted items for evaluating the importance and priority of security policies, where the weighted items may include the importance of policy objectives, the breadth of scope, the sensitivity of implementation objects, and the advancement of technical means;
[0025] S32. For each security policy category, collect relevant data to support the evaluation of weighted items;
[0026] S33, calculating a score for each security policy category based on the determined weighted items and the collected data;
[0027] S34, sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the calculated scores, with the policy categories with high scores being given primary priority and the policy categories with low scores being considered secondary priority;
[0028] S35. Review the results of weighted calculation to ensure their accuracy and rationality;
[0029] The weighted items are specifically:
[0030] The importance of strategic goals (T) is a qualitative assessment, determined by expert scoring and analysis of historical events;
[0031] The breadth of the scope (S) is measured by the number of systems, users, or geographic locations affected. The wider the scope, the greater the potential impact.
[0032] The sensitivity of the implementation object (O) is assessed by the sensitivity of the information or assets affected;
[0033] The advancement of technical means (M) is measured by the maturity of the technology, the cost of implementation, or the difficulty of maintenance;
[0034] The score for each security policy category is calculated using the following weighted formula:
[0035] Score=wT×T+wS×S+wO×O+wM×M;
[0036] Among them, wT, wS, wO, and wM are the weights of the corresponding weighted items respectively.
[0037] Preferably, the weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is specifically calculated as:
[0038] wT=(Z×40%)+(D1×25%)+(D2×20%)+(D3×10%)+(P×5%);
[0039] In the formula, Z represents the expert score, D1 is the analysis data of events one year before the real time, D2 is the analysis data of events two years before the real time, D3 is the analysis data of events three years before the real time, and P is the number of times the strategic goal occurred within five years before the real time. By taking the analysis of events in the past three years into consideration, the accuracy of the value of the weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is precisely ensured;
[0040] The weight of the breadth of the scope, wS, is calculated as follows:
[0041] wS=(N×40%)+(U×35%)+(G×25%);
[0042] In the formula, N represents the number of affected systems, U represents the number of affected users, and G represents the impact of geographical location;
[0043] The weight wO of the sensitivity of the implementation object is calculated as:
[0044] wO=(C×50%)+(I×30%)+(A×20%);
[0045] In the formula, C is the score of confidentiality of information, I is the score of integrity of information, and A is the score of availability of information;
[0046] The weight wM of the advancement of technical means is calculated as follows:
[0047] wM=(R×40%)+(Cost×30%)+(Main×30%);
[0048] In the formula, R is the score of technology maturity, Cost is the score of implementation cost, and Main is the score of maintenance difficulty.
[0049] Preferably, step S4 is specifically:
[0050] S41, determining the security policy categories, and sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the scores calculated in step S3, giving primary priority to policy categories with high scores, and considering policy categories with low scores as secondary priorities;
[0051] S42. Clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and describe in detail the specific requirements of each security policy category in terms of objectives, scope, implementation objects and technical means based on the specific scores and weighted item evaluation results of each category;
[0052] S43. Prepare a security policy document and integrate the above information into a complete security policy document;
[0053] S44. Review and modify the security policy document. Submit the first draft for review. Based on the feedback, modify and improve the security policy document to ensure that its content is accurate and easy to understand.
[0054] Preferably, the security policy document includes:
[0055] The introduction briefly introduces the background and purpose of the multi-technology integrated security policy analysis method;
[0056] Security policy category overview, listing all security policy categories and their importance and priority;
[0057] A detailed description of each security policy category, including objectives, scope, implementation objects, and specific requirements for technical means;
[0058] Review and modification records, record the reviews and modifications made during the writing process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the security policy document.
[0059] Preferably, step S5 is specifically:
[0060] S51. Submit the final reviewed and revised security policy to the person responsible for implementation and supervision;
[0061] S52. Personnel begin to implement specific security measures according to the requirements of the security policy document and establish a supervision mechanism to ensure the effective implementation of the policy, including regular inspections, audits and reports;
[0062] S53. Set an evaluation cycle to evaluate the implementation effect of the security policy;
[0063] S54. Make necessary updates to security policies based on assessment results and new security threats, technological developments, or business needs.
[0064] Preferably, step S5 also includes statistics on the implementation success rate, problem solving rate and update frequency of the security policy document, and the statistical data is used to measure the implementation effect of the security policy, specifically:
[0065] Implementation success rate = ;
[0066] Problem Solving Rate = ;
[0067] Update Frequency = .
[0068] Technical effects and advantages of the present invention: Compared with the prior art, the present invention provides a multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method, which has the following advantages:
[0069] By determining the classification criteria for security policies, the collected security policy information is preliminarily classified and summarized. Then, the importance and priority of each security policy category are evaluated through weighted calculation. The data-based quantitative evaluation method makes the classification and ranking of security policies more scientific and objective, which helps organizations allocate resources and energy more effectively and give priority to high-risk and high-priority security threats.
[0070] By clarifying the specific requirements of each security policy category and writing a detailed security policy document, the organization can more clearly understand the implementation details and expected effects of each security policy. At the same time, the security policy document is regularly evaluated and updated to adapt to the ever-changing security environment and business needs. This dynamic adjustment and optimization process enables the security policy to always keep close to the actual situation, thereby enhancing its implementation effect and adaptability;
[0071] By introducing the review and modification mechanism, the accuracy and completeness of the security policy document are ensured. The multiple reviews and modifications during the writing process not only eliminate potential errors and omissions, but also improve the readability and comprehensibility of the security policy document. At the same time, this method also emphasizes the statistics and analysis of indicators such as the success rate of security policy implementation, the problem solving rate, and the update frequency. These statistical data provide organizations with a quantitative basis for measuring the effectiveness of security policy implementation, further improving the systematicness and standardization of security policy management. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0072] Figure 1 A flow chart of the security strategy analysis method integrating multiple technologies of the present invention;
[0073] Figure 2 A flow chart of collecting and organizing security policy related information in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0074] Figure 3 The security policies are classified and summarized in the embodiments of the present invention to form different security policy category flow charts. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0075] In order to make the purpose, technical scheme and advantages of the present invention clearer, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with specific embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0076] The present invention provides a security policy analysis method integrating multiple technologies. The method provides strong support for organizations to build a more complete, efficient and reliable information security system by improving the accuracy and completeness of security policies, achieving scientific classification and priority sorting, enhancing implementation effect and adaptability, improving management systematization and standardization, and promoting cross-departmental collaboration and communication.
[0077] like Figure 1 As shown, the method specifically includes the following steps:
[0078] S1. Collect and organize information related to security policies, including the objectives, scope, and measures of security policies; Figure 2 As shown, step S1 collects and organizes security policy related information, including:
[0079] S11. Identify and collect information sources through internal document inspection, integrated technical system analysis data, employee interviews, and external industry resources;
[0080] S12. Classify and organize information. Classify the collected security policy information by category. Write a brief summary of each security policy, outlining its core content and key points. Create an index for each type of security policy to facilitate subsequent retrieval and reference.
[0081] S13, Information review: Verify the accuracy and completeness of security policies by comparing information from different sources, manually review the collated security policy information, propose modification suggestions, and revise and improve the security policy information based on the review suggestions;
[0082] S14. Information storage: Store the organized security policy information in a secure database to ensure data security and accessibility, and develop a backup strategy to ensure rapid recovery in the event of data loss or damage.
[0083] The above ensures the comprehensiveness of security policy information by identifying multiple information sources and collecting relevant information. This includes information from multiple dimensions such as internal documents, technical system analysis data, employee access records, and external industry resources, making the collected security policy information richer and more complete; the accuracy of security policy information is improved through information classification and review. Each security policy is manually reviewed and modified to ensure its content is accurate. At the same time, the accuracy of the security policy is further verified by comparing information from different sources.
[0084] The collected security policy information is classified by category and a brief summary is written to facilitate subsequent retrieval and reference. This classification and organization method helps to improve the usability of information, allowing relevant personnel to quickly find the required security policy information; the organized security policy information is stored in a secure database, and a backup strategy is formulated to ensure the security and accessibility of the data. This helps prevent data loss or damage and ensure the continuity and stability of the organization's information security.
[0085] S2. Classify and summarize security policies to form different security policy categories; e.g. Figure 3 As shown, the specific process of step S2 is:
[0086] S21. Determine the classification standards of security policies based on multiple dimensions such as security policy objectives, scope, implementation objects, and technical means;
[0087] S22. Preliminarily classify the collected security policy information according to the determined classification standard. On the basis of the preliminary classification, summarize the policies under each category, find out the commonalities and differences, and form a policy framework for each category.
[0088] S23. Define clear names and descriptions for each security policy category, ensuring that the connotation and extension of each category are clear;
[0089] The determined classification criteria include the security policy's objectives, scope, implementation objects, and technical means. Each policy is manually reviewed to determine its most appropriate category.
[0090] The above-mentioned classification standards for security policies provide clear guidance for subsequent classification and summarization. These standards help ensure the consistency and accuracy of the classification process and avoid subjective assumptions and arbitrariness. On the basis of preliminary classification, the policies under each category are summarized and summarized to find out the commonalities and differences, forming a policy framework for each category. This framework representation method helps to more clearly understand the core content and characteristics of each category of security policies, and provides strong support for the subsequent security policy formulation.
[0091] Clear names and descriptions are defined for each security policy category, ensuring that the connotation and extension of each category are clear, which helps to eliminate ambiguity and misunderstanding and improve the readability and understandability of security policies. At the same time, accurate names and descriptions also make it easier for relevant personnel to quickly find and reference the required security policy information; by manually reviewing each policy and determining its most appropriate category, the accuracy and reliability of the classification are further ensured. Manual review can combine actual conditions and experience to conduct in-depth analysis and interpretation of the policy, so as to more accurately classify it into the corresponding category; by classifying and summarizing security policies, different security policy categories are formed, which helps organizations manage and use security policy information more efficiently and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of security management. At the same time, the classification and summarization process also helps to discover common problems and differences in security policies, providing a basis for subsequent optimization and improvement.
[0092] S3, perform weighted calculation on each security policy category to determine its importance and priority; step S3 is specifically as follows:
[0093] S31. Determine the weighted items used to evaluate the importance and priority of security policies. The weighted items may include the importance of policy objectives, the breadth of scope, the sensitivity of implementation objects, and the advancement of technical means.
[0094] S32. For each security policy category, collect relevant data to support the evaluation of weighted items;
[0095] S33, calculating a score for each security policy category based on the determined weighted items and the collected data;
[0096] S34, sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the calculated scores, with the policy categories with high scores being given primary priority and the policy categories with low scores being considered secondary priority;
[0097] S35. Review the results of weighted calculation to ensure their accuracy and rationality;
[0098] The weighted items are:
[0099] The importance of strategic goals (T) is a qualitative assessment, determined by expert scoring and analysis of historical events;
[0100] The breadth of the scope (S) is measured by the number of systems, users, or geographic locations affected. The wider the scope, the greater the potential impact.
[0101] The sensitivity of the implementation object (O) is assessed by the sensitivity of the information or assets affected;
[0102] The advancement of technical means (M) is measured by the maturity of the technology, the cost of implementation, or the difficulty of maintenance;
[0103] The score for each security policy category is calculated using the following weighted formula:
[0104] Score=wT×T+wS×S+wO×O+wM×M;
[0105] Among them, wT, wS, wO, and wM are the weights of the corresponding weighted items respectively.
[0106] It should be noted that the weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is calculated as follows:
[0107] wT=(Z×40%)+(D1×25%)+(D2×20%)+(D3×10%)+(P×5%);
[0108] In the formula, Z represents the expert score, D1 is the analysis data of events one year before the real time, D2 is the analysis data of events two years before the real time, D3 is the analysis data of events three years before the real time, and P is the number of times the strategic goal occurred within five years before the real time. By taking the analysis of events in the past three years into consideration, the accuracy of the value of the weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is precisely ensured;
[0109] The weight of the breadth of the scope, wS, is calculated as follows:
[0110] wS=(N×40%)+(U×35%)+(G×25%);
[0111] In the formula, N represents the number of affected systems, U represents the number of affected users, and G represents the impact of geographical location;
[0112] The weight wO of the sensitivity of the implementation object is calculated as:
[0113] wO=(C×50%)+(I×30%)+(A×20%);
[0114] In the formula, C is the score of confidentiality of information, I is the score of integrity of information, and A is the score of availability of information;
[0115] The weight wM of the advancement of technical means is calculated as follows:
[0116] wM=(R×40%)+(Cost×30%)+(Main×30%);
[0117] In the formula, R is the score of technology maturity, Cost is the score of implementation cost, and Main is the score of maintenance difficulty.
[0118] S4. Generate a security policy document based on the weighted calculation results, clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and review and modify the security policy document to ensure its accuracy and completeness. Step S4 is specifically as follows:
[0119] S41, determining the security policy categories, and sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the scores calculated in step S3, giving primary priority to policy categories with high scores, and considering policy categories with low scores as secondary priorities;
[0120] S42. Clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and describe in detail the specific requirements of each security policy category in terms of objectives, scope, implementation objects and technical means based on the specific scores and weighted item evaluation results of each category;
[0121] S43. Prepare a security policy document and integrate the above information into a complete security policy document;
[0122] S44. Review and modify the security policy document. Submit the first draft for review. Modify and improve the security policy document based on feedback to ensure that its content is accurate and easy to understand. The security policy document includes:
[0123] The introduction briefly introduces the background and purpose of the multi-technology integrated security policy analysis method;
[0124] Security policy category overview, listing all security policy categories and their importance and priority;
[0125] A detailed description of each security policy category, including objectives, scope, implementation objects, and specific requirements for technical means;
[0126] Review and modification records, record the reviews and modifications made during the writing process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the security policy document.
[0127] S5. Submit the security policy to relevant departments or personnel for implementation and supervision. Regularly evaluate and update the security policy to adapt to changes in the security environment. Step S5 is as follows:
[0128] S51. Submit the final reviewed and revised security policy to the person responsible for implementation and supervision;
[0129] S52. Personnel begin to implement specific security measures according to the requirements of the security policy document and establish a supervision mechanism to ensure the effective implementation of the policy, including regular inspections, audits and reports;
[0130] S53. Set an evaluation cycle to evaluate the implementation effect of the security policy;
[0131] S54. Update security policies as necessary based on assessment results and new security threats, technological developments or business needs;
[0132] Furthermore, step S5 also includes statistics on the implementation success rate, problem solving rate and update frequency of the security policy document. The statistical data is used to measure the implementation effect of the security policy, specifically:
[0133] Implementation success rate = ;
[0134] Problem Solving Rate = ;
[0135] Update Frequency = .
[0136] In summary, compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:
[0137] By determining the classification criteria for security policies, the collected security policy information is preliminarily classified and summarized. Then, the importance and priority of each security policy category are evaluated through weighted calculation. The data-based quantitative evaluation method makes the classification and ranking of security policies more scientific and objective, which helps organizations allocate resources and energy more effectively and give priority to high-risk and high-priority security threats.
[0138] By clarifying the specific requirements of each security policy category and writing a detailed security policy document, the organization can more clearly understand the implementation details and expected effects of each security policy. At the same time, the security policy document is regularly evaluated and updated to adapt to the ever-changing security environment and business needs. This dynamic adjustment and optimization process enables the security policy to always keep close to the actual situation, thereby enhancing its implementation effect and adaptability;
[0139] By introducing the review and modification mechanism, the accuracy and completeness of the security policy document are ensured. The multiple reviews and modifications during the writing process not only eliminate potential errors and omissions, but also improve the readability and comprehensibility of the security policy document. At the same time, this method also emphasizes the statistics and analysis of indicators such as the success rate of security policy implementation, the problem solving rate, and the update frequency. These statistical data provide organizations with a quantitative basis for measuring the effectiveness of security policy implementation, further improving the systematicness and standardization of security policy management.
[0140] Finally, it should be noted that the above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, it is still possible for those skilled in the art to modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or to make equivalent substitutions for some of the technical features therein. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method, characterized in that: The steps include: S1. Collect and organize information related to security policies, including the objectives, scope, and measures of security policies; S2. Classify and summarize security policies to form different security policy categories; S3. Perform weighted calculation on each security policy category to determine its importance and priority; S4. Generate a security policy document based on the weighted calculation results, clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and review and modify the security policy document to ensure its accuracy and completeness; S5. Submit the security policy to relevant departments or personnel for implementation and supervision, and regularly evaluate and update the security policy to adapt to changes in the security environment.
2. According to the multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method of claim 1, it is characterized in that: Step S1 collects and organizes security policy related information, including: S11. Identify and collect information sources through internal document inspection, integrated technical system analysis data, employee interviews, and external industry resources; S12. Classify and organize information. Classify the collected security policy information by category. Write a brief summary of each security policy, outlining its core content and key points. Create an index for each type of security policy to facilitate subsequent retrieval and reference. S13, Information review: Verify the accuracy and completeness of security policies by comparing information from different sources, manually review the collated security policy information, propose modification suggestions, and revise and improve the security policy information based on the review suggestions; S14. Information storage: Store the organized security policy information in a secure database to ensure data security and accessibility, and develop a backup strategy to ensure rapid recovery in the event of data loss or damage.
3. According to the multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method of claim 1, it is characterized in that: The specific process of step S2 is: S21. Determine the classification standard of the security policy, which is based on multiple dimensions such as the goal, scope, implementation object, and technical means of the security policy; S22. Preliminarily classify the collected security policy information according to the determined classification standard. On the basis of the preliminary classification, summarize the policies under each category, find out the commonalities and differences, and form a policy framework for each category. S23. Define clear names and descriptions for each security policy category, ensuring that the connotation and extension of each category are clear; The determined classification criteria include the objectives, scope, implementation objects, and technical means of the security policy, and each policy is manually reviewed to determine its most appropriate category.
4. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Step S3 is specifically as follows: S31. Determine weighted items for evaluating the importance and priority of security policies, where the weighted items may include the importance of policy objectives, the breadth of scope, the sensitivity of implementation objects, and the advancement of technical means; S32. For each security policy category, collect relevant data to support the evaluation of weighted items; S33, calculating a score for each security policy category based on the determined weighted items and the collected data; S34, sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the calculated scores, with the policy categories with high scores being given primary priority and the policy categories with low scores being considered secondary priority; S35. Review the results of weighted calculation to ensure their accuracy and rationality; The weighted items are specifically: The importance of strategic goals (T) is a qualitative assessment, determined by expert scoring and analysis of historical events; The breadth of the scope (S) is measured by the number of systems, users, or geographic locations affected. The wider the scope, the greater the potential impact. The sensitivity of the implementation object (O) is assessed by the sensitivity of the information or assets affected; The advancement of technical means (M) is measured by the maturity of the technology, the cost of implementation, or the difficulty of maintenance; The score for each security policy category is calculated using the following weighted formula: Score=wT×T+wS×S+wO×O+wM×M; Among them, wT, wS, wO, and wM are the weights of the corresponding weighted items respectively.
5. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 4 is characterized by: The weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is specifically calculated as: wT=(Z×40%)+(D1×25%)+(D2×20%)+(D3×10%)+(P×5%); In the formula, Z represents the expert score, D1 is the analysis data of events one year before the real time, D2 is the analysis data of events two years before the real time, D3 is the analysis data of events three years before the real time, and P is the number of times the strategic goal occurred within five years before the real time. By taking the analysis of events in the past three years into consideration, the accuracy of the value of the weight wT of the importance of the strategic goal is precisely ensured; The weight of the breadth of the scope, wS, is calculated as follows: wS=(N×40%)+(U×35%)+(G×25%); In the formula, N represents the number of affected systems, U represents the number of affected users, and G represents the impact of geographical location; The weight wO of the sensitivity of the implementation object is calculated as: wO=(C×50%)+(I×30%)+(A×20%); In the formula, C is the score of confidentiality of information, I is the score of integrity of information, and A is the score of availability of information; The weight wM of the advancement of technical means is calculated as follows: wM=(R×40%)+(Cost×30%)+(Main×30%); In the formula, R is the score of technology maturity, Cost is the score of implementation cost, and Main is the score of maintenance difficulty.
6. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Step S4 is specifically as follows: S41, determining the security policy categories, and sorting and classifying the security policy categories according to the scores calculated in step S3, giving primary priority to policy categories with high scores, and considering policy categories with low scores as secondary priorities; S42. Clarify the requirements of each security policy category, and describe in detail the specific requirements of each security policy category in terms of objectives, scope, implementation objects and technical means based on the specific scores and weighted item evaluation results of each category; S43. Prepare a security policy document and integrate the above information into a complete security policy document; S44. Review and modify the security policy document. Submit the first draft for review. Based on the feedback, modify and improve the security policy document to ensure that its content is accurate and easy to understand.
7. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The security policy document includes: The introduction briefly introduces the background and purpose of the multi-technology integrated security policy analysis method; Security policy category overview, listing all security policy categories and their importance and priority; A detailed description of each security policy category, including objectives, scope, implementation objects, and specific requirements for technical means; Review and modification records, record the reviews and modifications made during the writing process to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the security policy document.
8. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Step S5 is specifically as follows: S51. Submit the final reviewed and revised security policy to the person responsible for implementation and supervision; S52. Personnel begin to implement specific security measures according to the requirements of the security policy document and establish a supervision mechanism to ensure the effective implementation of the policy, including regular inspections, audits and reports; S53. Set an evaluation cycle to evaluate the implementation effect of the security policy; S54. Make necessary updates to security policies based on assessment results and new security threats, technological developments, or business needs.
9. The multi-technology integrated security strategy analysis method according to claim 8 is characterized in that: Step S5 also includes statistics on the implementation success rate, problem solving rate and update frequency of the security policy document. The statistical data is used to measure the implementation effect of the security policy, specifically: Implementation success rate = ; Problem Solving Rate = ; Update Frequency = .