A system and method for soil and water conservation monitoring

Abstract

The present invention relates to the technical field of environmental monitoring, and discloses a system and method for soil and water conservation monitoring, aiming to provide a scientific basis for soil and water loss prevention and control through dynamic real-time monitoring and comprehensive evaluation. The method includes: collecting soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters, calculating soil stability, and evaluating the risk of soil and water loss according to the soil stability; when the risk of soil and water loss exceeds the threshold, performing a soil stability score according to the soil stability and soil basic parameters; when the soil stability score is lower than the set threshold, evaluating the vegetation restoration ability, and evaluating the regional soil and water conservation efficiency in combination with the risk of soil and water loss and the vegetation restoration ability; judging whether to trigger an alarm according to the evaluation result of the soil and water conservation efficiency. By introducing multi-dimensional evaluation mechanisms such as soil stability, stability score, and vegetation restoration ability, the present invention provides an accurate and dynamic soil and water conservation monitoring scheme, which has high real-time performance, reliability and application value.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of environmental monitoring, and in particular, to a system and method for soil and water conservation monitoring. Background Art

[0002] In the context of global climate change and changing land use patterns, the problem of soil erosion has become increasingly prominent globally, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. This phenomenon not only leads to land degradation and a decline in agricultural yields but also may trigger natural disasters such as debris flows and floods, posing a serious threat to the ecological environment and the human living environment. Therefore, soil and water conservation has become a key research area for soil protection, agricultural production, and ecological environmental protection. Currently, soil and water conservation monitoring mainly relies on traditional ground observations and manual surveys, which are often difficult to achieve real-time and comprehensive monitoring of soil erosion conditions and have obvious deficiencies in dynamic prediction.

[0003] In view of this, there is an urgent need to develop a new soil and water conservation monitoring technology to more effectively address the challenges brought by soil erosion. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In view of this, the present invention proposes a system and method for soil and water conservation monitoring, aiming to achieve dynamic prediction, monitoring, and early warning of soil erosion by collecting soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters and combining an innovative soil stability and soil erosion risk assessment mechanism.

[0005] The present invention proposes a method for soil and water conservation monitoring, including:

[0006] Collecting soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters, obtaining soil stability based on the environmental real-time parameters, and assessing the soil erosion risk based on the soil stability; wherein, the environmental real-time parameters include vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff;

[0007] When the assessment result of the soil erosion risk is greater than a pre-set soil erosion risk threshold, performing a soil stability score based on the soil stability and soil basic parameters; wherein, the soil basic parameters include soil humidity, slope, and aspect;

[0008] When the soil stability score result is less than the stability score threshold, assessing the vegetation restoration ability based on the environmental real-time parameters; then assessing the regional soil and water conservation efficiency based on the assessment result of the vegetation restoration ability, the assessment result of the soil erosion risk, and the environmental real-time parameters.

[0009] Based on the relationship between the assessment result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the efficiency assessment result threshold, determining whether to trigger an early warning.

[0010] Preferably, the soil stability is calculated by the following formula:

[0011] ;

[0012] where S soil represents the soil stability, reflecting the soil's anti-erosion ability under natural conditions; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the degree to which the soil surface is covered by plants; D roots represents the root depth, reflecting the average depth of plant roots; P rain represents the rainfall, in millimeters, reflecting the precipitation within a certain time period; Q runoff represents the runoff, in cubic meters per second, reflecting the volume of surface water flow; β erosion represents the empirical coefficient, used to measure the influence degree of rainfall and runoff on soil erosion.

[0013] Preferably, the soil and water loss risk is calculated by the following formula:

[0014] ;

[0015] where R erosion represents the soil and water loss risk, reflecting the possibility of soil loss under certain rainfall and runoff conditions; E soil represents the soil erosion amount, reflecting the soil loss amount per unit area, in kilograms per square meter; S soil represents the soil stability, reflecting the soil's anti-erosion ability.

[0016] Preferably, the soil stability score is calculated by the following formula:

[0017] ;

[0018] where S score represents the soil stability score, reflecting the soil's anti-erosion ability; H soil represents the soil humidity, in percentage, reflecting the water content in the soil; θ slope represents the slope, in degrees, reflecting the slope angle of the area where the soil is located; ϕ aspect represents the aspect, in degrees, reflecting the orientation of the slope; γ slope represents the influence coefficient of slope on soil stability; δ aspect represents the influence coefficient of aspect on soil stability.

[0019] Preferably, the regional soil and water conservation efficiency is calculated by the following formula:

[0020] ;

[0021] Among them, E effect represents the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, reflecting the effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures in this region; R erosion represents the soil erosion risk, reflecting the potential risk of soil erosion in this region; S score represents the soil stability score, reflecting the stability of the soil; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the protection of the soil; α restore represents the influence coefficient of vegetation restoration ability, reflecting the contribution of vegetation restoration to soil and water conservation efficiency.

[0022] Preferably, the soil erosion risk threshold is dynamically adjusted according to historical data and regional characteristics, and the specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0023] ;

[0024] Among them, R threshold (t) represents the soil erosion risk threshold, reflecting the threshold of soil erosion at a given time point; D history (t−i) represents historical rainfall, runoff, and erosion data, reflecting relevant parameters within a certain past time period; α i represents the weight coefficient of historical data, used to adjust the influence of data from different time periods on threshold prediction.

[0025] Preferably, the vegetation restoration ability is calculated by the following formula:

[0026] ;

[0027] Among them, C restore represents the vegetation restoration ability, reflecting the restoration ability of vegetation in this region to soil and water conservation; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the protection of plants on the soil; D roots represents the root depth, affecting the consolidation ability of the soil; β restore represents the vegetation restoration influence coefficient, used to measure the influence of vegetation restoration on soil stability and soil erosion.

[0028] Preferably, the early warning trigger condition is calculated by the following formula:

[0029] ;

[0030] Among them, W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of regional soil and water conservation efficiency, reflecting whether it reaches the high-risk state of soil erosion; E effect (t) represents the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, reflecting the effectiveness of regional soil and water conservation measures; S score (t) represents the soil stability score, reflecting the erosion resistance of the soil; Vcover (t) represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the coverage ability of regional vegetation.

[0031] Preferably, when judging whether to trigger an early warning based on the relationship between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the threshold of the efficiency evaluation result, it includes:

[0032] When W warning (t) ≥, W threshold At this time, the judgment result is to trigger an early warning;

[0033] Among them, W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency; W threshold Represents the threshold of the efficiency evaluation result.

[0034] The present invention also proposes a system for soil and water conservation monitoring, which is used to implement the above-mentioned method for soil and water conservation monitoring.

[0035] Preferably, the system for soil and water conservation monitoring includes:

[0036] A data acquisition module, which is used to collect soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters in real time. The soil basic parameters include soil humidity, slope, and aspect. The environmental real-time parameters include vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff;

[0037] A soil stability calculation module, which is used to calculate the soil stability according to the environmental real-time parameters;

[0038] A soil erosion risk assessment module, which is used to calculate the soil erosion risk according to the calculated soil stability and environmental real-time parameters such as rainfall and runoff;

[0039] A soil stability scoring module, which is used to calculate the soil stability score according to the soil erosion risk assessment result;

[0040] A vegetation restoration ability evaluation module, which is used to evaluate the vegetation restoration ability of the region;

[0041] A regional soil and water conservation efficiency evaluation module, which is used to calculate the regional soil and water conservation efficiency according to the soil stability score, vegetation restoration ability, and soil erosion risk assessment result;

[0042] An early warning judgment module, which is used to judge whether to trigger a soil erosion early warning according to the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and soil stability score.

[0043] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:

[0044] Real-time Dynamic Monitoring Technology: Through the real-time collection of environmental parameters (such as rainfall, runoff, vegetation coverage rate, root depth, etc.), this study has achieved real-time monitoring of the regional soil erosion situation, enabling the timely identification of potential risks and the issuance of early warnings.

[0045] Comprehensive Assessment Method for Soil Erosion Risk: By combining soil stability and the soil stability scoring mechanism, this study calculates the soil erosion risk assessment results through specific formulas, accurately evaluating the stability of the soil under different environmental conditions and providing a scientific basis for soil erosion prevention and control.

[0046] Precise Assessment Method for Soil and Water Conservation Efficiency: The regional soil and water conservation efficiency assessment method proposed in this study comprehensively considers the vegetation restoration ability, soil erosion risk, and soil stability, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and providing scientific guidance for the formulation of subsequent soil and water conservation measures.

[0047] Construction of Intelligent Early Warning System: Based on the soil erosion risk assessment results and soil stability scoring, the intelligent early warning system constructed in this study can predict high-risk areas, trigger the early warning mechanism, assist relevant departments in taking timely countermeasures, and effectively prevent the occurrence of soil erosion disasters.

[0048] Wide Adaptability and Application Prospects: The soil and water conservation monitoring technology proposed in this study is applicable to various terrains, climates, and ecological conditions, showing good adaptability and broad application prospects. Description of the Drawings

[0049] By reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, various other advantages and benefits will become clear to those of ordinary skill in the art. The drawings are only for the purpose of showing the preferred embodiments and are not to be considered as limiting the present invention. Moreover, throughout the drawings, the same reference numerals are used to represent the same components. In the drawings:

[0050] Figure 1 is a flowchart of the method for soil and water conservation monitoring of the present invention. Detailed Embodiments

[0051] The exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the drawings. Although the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure can be implemented in various forms and should not be limited by the embodiments set forth herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided so that the present disclosure can be more thoroughly understood and the scope of the present disclosure can be fully conveyed to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that, without conflict, the embodiments in the present invention and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other. The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings and in conjunction with the embodiments.

[0052] Refer to Figure 1, this embodiment provides a method for soil and water conservation monitoring, including:

[0053] Collect soil basic parameters and real-time environmental parameters, obtain soil stability based on the real-time environmental parameters, and evaluate the soil erosion risk according to the soil stability; among them, the real-time environmental parameters include vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff;

[0054] When the evaluation result of the soil erosion risk is greater than the pre-set soil erosion risk threshold, perform a soil stability score according to the soil stability and soil basic parameters; among them, the soil basic parameters include soil humidity, slope, and aspect;

[0055] When the soil stability score result is less than the stability score threshold, evaluate the vegetation restoration ability according to the real-time environmental parameters; then evaluate the regional soil and water conservation efficiency according to the evaluation result of the vegetation restoration ability, the evaluation result of the soil erosion risk, and the real-time environmental parameters;

[0056] Based on the relationship between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the efficiency evaluation result threshold, determine whether to trigger an early warning.

[0057] It can be seen that this embodiment proposes a method for monitoring the soil and water conservation status, and the specific steps are as follows:

[0058] First of all, it is necessary to collect the basic parameters of the soil and the real-time parameters in the environment. By analyzing these real-time environmental parameters, the soil stability can be obtained. Based on the soil stability, the risk of soil erosion is further evaluated; among these real-time environmental parameters, key indicators such as vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff are particularly included.

[0059] Next, if the evaluated soil erosion risk result exceeds the pre-set soil erosion risk threshold, then it is necessary to perform a soil stability score based on the soil stability and the basic parameters of the soil. The soil basic parameters mainly include important indicators such as soil humidity, slope, and aspect.

[0060] Once the result of the soil stability score is lower than the stability score threshold, the next step is to evaluate the vegetation restoration ability according to the real-time environmental parameters. After evaluating the vegetation restoration ability, combined with the evaluation result of the soil erosion risk and the real-time environmental parameters, the soil and water conservation efficiency in the region is comprehensively evaluated.

[0061] Finally, based on the comparison between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the efficiency evaluation result threshold, determine whether it is necessary to trigger the early warning mechanism, so as to take corresponding soil and water conservation measures in a timely manner.

[0062] It is understandable that this embodiment provides a comprehensive and systematic soil and water conservation monitoring method. This method not only considers the basic characteristics of the soil but also fully incorporates the influence of real-time environmental parameters, making the assessment of soil erosion risk more accurate and comprehensive. Through detailed analysis steps, from the calculation of soil stability to the assessment of soil erosion risk, and then to the judgment of soil stability score and vegetation restoration ability, each step provides a solid foundation for the final assessment of soil and water conservation effectiveness. The application of this method will help improve the efficiency and accuracy of soil and water conservation work and provide strong support for the protection and sustainable development of the ecological environment.

[0063] In some embodiments of the present application, the soil stability is calculated by the following formula:

[0064] ;

[0065] where S soil represents the soil stability, reflecting the soil's erosion resistance under natural conditions; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the degree to which the soil surface is covered by plants; D roots represents the root depth, reflecting the average depth of plant roots; P rain represents the rainfall, in millimeters, reflecting the precipitation within a certain period; Q runoff represents the runoff, in cubic meters per second, reflecting the volume of surface water flow; β erosion represents the empirical coefficient, used to measure the influence degree of rainfall and runoff on soil erosion.

[0066] It can be seen that in this embodiment, by comprehensively considering multiple factors such as vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff, and using the empirical coefficient for weighted calculation, a quantitative index of soil stability is obtained. This index can more accurately reflect the soil's erosion resistance under natural conditions and provides a scientific basis for the assessment of soil erosion risk. In addition, this method also realizes the hierarchical management and early warning mechanism of soil and water conservation status by setting thresholds for soil erosion risk and stability score, which helps to timely discover and address potential soil erosion problems. This comprehensive and systematic monitoring method not only improves the efficiency and accuracy of soil and water conservation work but also provides strong support for the protection and sustainable development of the ecological environment.

[0067] It can be understood that in the process of monitoring the soil and water conservation status, this embodiment also pays special attention to the real-time and accuracy of data. Through advanced sensor technology and data acquisition systems, it is possible to obtain real-time soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters, ensuring the timeliness and reliability of the evaluation results. At the same time, this method also fully considers the influence of regional differences and climate change on the soil and water conservation status. By flexibly adjusting the empirical coefficients and thresholds, the evaluation results are made more in line with the actual situation, improving the accuracy and effectiveness of the early warning mechanism.

[0068] In some embodiments of the present application, the soil erosion risk is calculated by the following formula;

[0069] ;

[0070] wherein, R erosion represents the soil erosion risk, reflecting the possibility of soil loss under certain rainfall and runoff conditions; E soil represents the soil erosion amount, reflecting the soil loss amount per unit area, with the unit of kilograms per square meter; S soil represents the soil stability, reflecting the soil's ability to resist erosion.

[0071] It can be seen that through the soil erosion risk formula, this embodiment further quantifies the possibility of soil erosion, combines the soil erosion amount with the soil stability, and provides a more accurate mathematical model for risk assessment. The application of this formula makes the assessment of soil erosion risk no longer rely on subjective judgment or empirical estimation, but has a more objective and scientific basis. At the same time, the formula also takes into account the dynamic relationship between the soil erosion amount and the soil stability, reflecting the change law of the soil loss risk under different conditions, and providing strong support for formulating targeted soil and water conservation measures. This method of comprehensively considering multiple factors and using a mathematical model for quantitative assessment not only improves the scientificity and accuracy of soil and water conservation work, but also injects new vitality into the protection and sustainable development of the ecological environment.

[0072] It can be understood that in the process of monitoring the soil and water conservation status, this embodiment also incorporates intelligent technical means. By introducing artificial intelligence algorithms and big data analysis technologies, it is possible to deeply mine and analyze the collected soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters, further improving the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results. The application of these technical means not only improves the monitoring efficiency, but also makes the early warning mechanism more sensitive and intelligent, capable of discovering and warning potential soil erosion risks in the first time.

[0073] In some embodiments of the present application, the soil stability score is calculated by the following formula:

[0074] ;

[0075] Among them, S score represents the soil stability score, reflecting the soil's erosion resistance ability; H soil represents the soil moisture, in percentage, reflecting the water content in the soil; θ slope represents the slope, in degrees, reflecting the slope angle of the area where the soil is located; ϕ aspect represents the aspect, in degrees, reflecting the orientation of the slope; γ slope represents the influence coefficient of the slope on soil stability; δ aspect represents the influence coefficient of the aspect on soil stability.

[0076] It can be seen that in this embodiment, by comprehensively considering multiple factors such as soil moisture, slope, and aspect, and using the influence coefficient for weighted calculation, a quantitative index of the soil stability score is obtained. This index can more accurately reflect the erosion resistance ability of the soil under different conditions, providing a scientific basis for soil stability assessment. By setting the stability score threshold, the stability status of the soil can be further judged, providing an important reference for taking corresponding soil and water conservation measures. The application of this method not only improves the accuracy and reliability of soil stability assessment but also provides strong support for formulating targeted soil and water conservation plans. At the same time, this scoring system also fully considers the influence of regional differences and soil characteristics. By flexibly adjusting the influence coefficient, the evaluation results are more in line with the actual situation, contributing to the precision and scientific nature of soil and water conservation work.

[0077] In some embodiments of the present application, the regional soil and water conservation effectiveness is calculated by the following formula:

[0078] ;

[0079] Among them, E effect represents the regional soil and water conservation effectiveness, reflecting the effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures in this region; R erosion represents the soil erosion risk, reflecting the potential risk of soil erosion in this region; S score represents the soil stability score, reflecting the stability of the soil; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the protection of the soil; α restore represents the influence coefficient of vegetation restoration ability, reflecting the contribution of vegetation restoration to soil and water conservation effectiveness.

[0080] It can be understood that in this embodiment, by constructing a quantitative evaluation model for regional soil and water conservation efficiency, multiple factors such as soil erosion risk, soil stability, vegetation coverage rate, and vegetation restoration ability are comprehensively considered. This model not only reveals the effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures but also deeply analyzes the internal relationships among various factors and their synergistic effects on soil and water conservation efficiency. Through quantitative evaluation, the actual effect of soil and water conservation in this region can be intuitively understood, providing a scientific basis for further optimizing soil and water conservation measures and improving the regional ecological quality.

[0081] Meanwhile, this model also embodies the concept of ecological restoration and protection. The influence coefficients of vegetation coverage rate and vegetation restoration ability emphasize the important role of vegetation in soil and water conservation. This not only helps us recognize the protective effect of vegetation on soil but also reminds us that when formulating soil and water conservation measures, the restoration and protection of vegetation should be fully considered to achieve a virtuous ecological cycle and sustainable development.

[0082] In addition, this embodiment also demonstrates the broad application prospects of quantitative evaluation in soil and water conservation work. By constructing a scientific quantitative evaluation system, we can more accurately grasp the regional soil and water conservation situation, providing strong support for government decision-making, scientific research, and public education. This not only helps improve the scientific nature and accuracy of soil and water conservation work but also contributes to promoting the construction of ecological civilization and the process of sustainable development in the whole society.

[0083] In some embodiments of the present application, the soil erosion risk threshold is dynamically adjusted according to historical data and regional characteristics, and the specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0084] ;

[0085] Wherein, R threshold (t) represents the soil erosion risk threshold, reflecting the threshold of soil erosion at a given time point; D history (t−i) represents historical rainfall, runoff, and erosion data, reflecting relevant parameters within a certain past time period; α i represents the weight coefficient of historical data, used to adjust the influence of data in different time periods on threshold prediction.

[0086] It can be understood that in this embodiment, by introducing historical data and regional characteristics, the soil erosion risk threshold is dynamically adjusted, improving the flexibility and accuracy of the evaluation. Historical rainfall, runoff, and erosion data, as important input parameters, can reflect the past soil erosion situation in the region, providing an important basis for predicting future soil erosion risks. At the same time, by setting the weight coefficient, reasonable weighting of data in different time periods makes the prediction results more in line with the actual situation, helping us formulate soil and water conservation measures more scientifically and reduce the soil erosion risk.

[0087] This method of dynamically adjusting the risk threshold of soil and water loss not only reflects respect for history and consideration of reality but also demonstrates the wisdom of scientific prediction and decision-making. By continuously optimizing and adjusting the evaluation model, we can more accurately grasp the regional soil and water loss situation and provide strong support for formulating targeted soil and water conservation plans.

[0088] In some embodiments of the present application, the vegetation restoration ability is calculated by the following formula:

[0089] ;

[0090] where C restore represents the vegetation restoration ability, reflecting the restoration ability of the vegetation in this area for soil and water conservation; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the protective effect of plants on the soil; D roots represents the root depth, affecting the consolidation ability of the soil; β restore represents the vegetation restoration influence coefficient, used to measure the impact of vegetation restoration on soil stability and soil and water loss.

[0091] It can be understood that in this embodiment, by comprehensively considering multiple dimensions such as the vegetation coverage rate, root depth, and vegetation restoration influence coefficient, the restoration ability of vegetation in soil and water conservation is comprehensively evaluated. The vegetation coverage rate, as an indicator directly reflecting the soil protection status, is directly related to the risk of soil erosion. The root depth determines the consolidation effect of vegetation on the soil. The deeper the roots, the stronger the soil's erosion resistance. The vegetation restoration influence coefficient further quantifies the improvement effect of vegetation restoration on soil stability and soil and water loss, helping us to more deeply understand the important role of vegetation restoration in soil and water conservation.

[0092] This quantitative evaluation method not only improves our understanding of the vegetation restoration ability but also provides an important basis for formulating scientific and reasonable vegetation restoration strategies. By accurately evaluating the vegetation restoration ability of different regions, we can implement targeted vegetation restoration measures, effectively improve the soil and water conservation efficiency of the region, and promote the virtuous cycle and sustainable development of the ecosystem.

[0093] In some embodiments of the present application, the early warning trigger condition is calculated by the following formula:

[0094] ;

[0095] where W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, reflecting whether it reaches the high-risk state of soil and water loss; E effect (t) represents the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, reflecting the effectiveness of regional soil and water conservation measures; S score(t) represents the soil stability score, reflecting the soil's erosion resistance ability; V cover (t) represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the vegetation coverage ability of the area.

[0096] It can be understood that in this embodiment, by comprehensively considering multiple factors such as the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, soil stability score, and vegetation coverage rate, the warning trigger conditions are accurately set. The regional soil and water conservation efficiency, as a key indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures, directly determines whether the area faces a high risk of soil erosion. The soil stability score further quantifies the soil's erosion resistance ability, providing an important reference for evaluating the regional soil erosion risk. The vegetation coverage rate directly reflects the vegetation coverage of the area, and its change has an important impact on soil protection and soil erosion status. By incorporating these factors into the calculation formula of the warning trigger conditions, we can more accurately determine whether the area reaches a high risk state of soil erosion, take effective measures for intervention in a timely manner, thus avoiding the occurrence of soil erosion and protecting the safety and stability of the regional ecological environment. The setting of this warning trigger condition not only improves our warning ability for soil erosion risk but also provides an important basis for formulating targeted soil and water conservation strategies.

[0097] In some embodiments of the present application, when judging whether to trigger a warning based on the relationship between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the threshold of the efficiency evaluation result, it includes:

[0098] When W warning (t) ≥, W threshold then the judgment result is to trigger a warning;

[0099] wherein, W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency; W threshold represents the threshold of the efficiency evaluation result.

[0100] It can be understood that in this embodiment, by setting a clear threshold W threshold of the efficiency evaluation result, a quantitative standard is provided for judging whether to trigger a warning in the area. When the evaluation result W warning (t) of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency reaches or exceeds this threshold, the system immediately judges it as a warning trigger state, prompting us to pay attention to the soil erosion risk in this area. The introduction of this judgment mechanism makes the warning process more objective and accurate, avoiding the subjectivity and uncertainty of manual judgment. At the same time, it also provides strong support for taking timely intervention measures to ensure that effective measures can be taken for prevention and treatment before the risk occurs, thus minimizing the impact of soil erosion on the ecological environment and agricultural production.

[0101] This embodiment also proposes a system for soil and water conservation monitoring, which is used to implement the above-mentioned method for soil and water conservation monitoring. The system for soil and water conservation monitoring includes:

[0102] A data acquisition module, which is used to collect soil basic parameters and environmental real-time parameters in real time. The soil basic parameters include soil humidity, slope, and aspect. The environmental real-time parameters include vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff;

[0103] A soil stability calculation module, which is used to calculate the soil stability according to the environmental real-time parameters;

[0104] A soil erosion risk assessment module, which is used to calculate the soil erosion risk according to the calculated soil stability and environmental real-time parameters such as rainfall and runoff;

[0105] A soil stability scoring module, which is used to calculate the soil stability score according to the soil erosion risk assessment result;

[0106] A vegetation restoration ability assessment module, which is used to evaluate the vegetation restoration ability of the region;

[0107] A regional soil and water conservation efficiency assessment module, which is used to calculate the regional soil and water conservation efficiency according to the soil stability score, vegetation restoration ability, and soil erosion risk assessment result;

[0108] An early warning judgment module, which is used to judge whether to trigger a soil erosion early warning according to parameters such as regional soil and water conservation efficiency and soil stability score.

[0109] It can be seen that this embodiment further proposes a system for soil and water conservation monitoring, which can effectively execute the above-mentioned soil and water conservation monitoring method. The soil and water conservation monitoring system mainly includes the following key modules:

[0110] A data acquisition module, whose main function is to collect the basic parameters of the soil and the real-time parameters in the environment in real time. Among them, the soil basic parameters cover key indicators such as soil humidity, slope, and aspect, while the environmental real-time parameters include important data such as vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff;

[0111] A soil stability calculation module, the function of this module is to calculate the soil stability based on the collected environmental real-time parameters. Through precise calculation, the stability status of the soil under the current environmental conditions can be evaluated;

[0112] A soil erosion risk assessment module, which is responsible for using the calculated soil stability and environmental real-time parameters such as rainfall and runoff to evaluate the risk degree of soil erosion. This assessment is of great significance for preventing and controlling soil erosion;

[0113] Soil stability scoring module, which further calculates the soil stability score based on the results of the soil erosion risk assessment. This score can intuitively reflect the soil stability status and provide important reference basis for decision-makers;

[0114] Vegetation restoration ability assessment module, whose main task is to assess the vegetation restoration ability in a specific area. The vegetation restoration ability is an important indicator to measure the ecological restoration potential of a region;

[0115] Regional soil and water conservation efficiency assessment module, whose function is to calculate the soil and water conservation efficiency of the region by integrating the soil stability score, vegetation restoration ability and the results of soil erosion risk assessment. This efficiency assessment is crucial for formulating effective soil and water conservation strategies;

[0116] Early warning judgment module, which judges whether it is necessary to trigger a soil erosion early warning according to the regional soil and water conservation efficiency, soil stability score and other relevant parameters. The establishment of the early warning mechanism plays an important role in taking timely measures to prevent soil erosion.

[0117] It can be understood that the soil and water conservation monitoring system proposed in this embodiment realizes the comprehensive monitoring and early warning of soil erosion risk through the collaborative work of each module. The data acquisition module ensures the real-time and accuracy of data, providing a solid foundation for subsequent assessments. The soil stability calculation module, soil erosion risk assessment module and soil stability scoring module together constitute a quantitative assessment system for soil stability and soil erosion risk, making the assessment results more scientific and reliable. The vegetation restoration ability assessment module and the regional soil and water conservation efficiency assessment module further consider the ecological restoration potential and overall soil and water conservation efficiency, providing a more comprehensive basis for formulating targeted soil and water conservation strategies. The early warning judgment module, as the core of the whole system, can trigger an early warning in time according to the assessment results, winning valuable time for taking timely intervention measures. In summary, the soil and water conservation monitoring system and method proposed in this embodiment not only improve the accuracy and objectivity of soil erosion risk early warning, but also provide strong technical support and scientific guidance for soil and water conservation work.

[0118] Those skilled in the art should understand that the embodiments of the present application can be provided as a method, a system or a computer program product. Therefore, the present application can adopt the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Moreover, the present application can adopt the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0119] This application is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that each flow and / or block in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams can be implemented by computer program instructions, and the combination of flows and / or blocks in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams can also be implemented. These computer program instructions can be provided to the processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing devices to generate a machine, such that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing devices generate means for implementing the functions specified in one flow Figure 1 one flow or multiple flows and / or blocks Figure 1 or means for implementing the functions specified in multiple blocks.

[0120] These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory generate a manufactured article including instruction means that implement the functions specified in one flow Figure 1 one flow or multiple flows and / or blocks Figure 1 or means for implementing the functions specified in multiple blocks.

[0121] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device, such that a series of operation steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to generate a computer-implemented process, and thus the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device provide steps for implementing the functions specified in one flow Figure 1 one flow or multiple flows and / or blocks Figure 1 or means for implementing the functions specified in multiple blocks.

[0122] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and are not intended to limit them. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that: it is still possible to modify the specific implementation manners of the present invention or make equivalent replacements, and any modification or equivalent replacement that does not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention shall be covered by the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for soil and water conservation monitoring, characterized in that, Including: Collecting soil basic parameters and real-time environmental parameters, obtaining soil stability according to the real-time environmental parameters, and evaluating the soil erosion risk according to the soil stability; wherein, the real-time environmental parameters include vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff; When the evaluation result of the soil erosion risk is greater than the preset soil erosion risk threshold, performing a soil stability score according to the soil stability and soil basic parameters; wherein, the soil basic parameters include soil humidity, slope, and aspect; When the soil stability score result is less than the stability score threshold, evaluating the vegetation restoration ability according to the real-time environmental parameters; then evaluating the regional soil and water conservation efficiency according to the evaluation result of the vegetation restoration ability, the evaluation result of the soil erosion risk, and the real-time environmental parameters; Based on the relationship between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the efficiency evaluation result threshold, determining whether to trigger an early warning; The soil stability is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, S soil represents soil stability; V cover represents vegetation coverage rate; D roots represents root depth; P rain represents rainfall, with the unit of millimeter; Q runoff represents runoff, with the unit of cubic meter per second; β erosion represents the empirical coefficient; The soil erosion risk is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, R erosion represents the soil and water loss risk; E soil represents the soil erosion amount, with the unit of kilograms per square meter; S soil represents the soil stability.

2. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 1, wherein The soil stability score is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, S score represents the soil stability score; H soil represents the soil humidity, with the unit of percentage; θ slope represents the slope, with the unit of degree; ϕ aspect represents the aspect, with the unit of degree; γ slope represents the influence coefficient of the slope on soil stability; δ aspect represents the influence coefficient of the aspect on soil stability.

3. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 2, wherein, The regional soil and water conservation efficiency is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, E effect represents the regional soil and water conservation efficiency; R erosion represents the soil erosion risk; S score represents the soil stability score; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate; α restore represents the influence coefficient of vegetation restoration ability.

4. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 3, wherein The soil erosion risk threshold is dynamically adjusted according to historical data and regional characteristics, and the specific calculation formula is as follows: ； Among them, R threshold (t) represents the soil and water loss risk threshold; D history (t−i) represents the historical rainfall, runoff, and erosion data within a certain past time period; α i represents the weight coefficient of the historical data.

5. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 4, characterized in that, The vegetation restoration ability is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, C restore represents the vegetation restoration ability; V cover represents the vegetation coverage rate, reflecting the protective effect of plants on the soil; D roots represents the root depth; β restore represents the vegetation restoration influence coefficient.

6. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 5, wherein The early warning trigger condition is calculated by the following formula: ； Among them, W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation effectiveness; E effect (t) represents the regional soil and water conservation effectiveness; S score (t) represents the soil stability score; V cover (t) represents the vegetation coverage rate.

7. The method for soil and water conservation monitoring according to claim 6, wherein When determining whether to trigger an early warning based on the relationship between the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the efficiency evaluation result threshold, it includes: When W warning (t) ≥ W threshold the determination result is a trigger warning; Among them, W warning (t) represents the evaluation result of the regional soil and water conservation effectiveness; W threshold represents the threshold of the effectiveness evaluation result.

8. A system for soil and water conservation monitoring, characterized in that, A method for soil and water conservation monitoring for implementing any one of claims 1-7, including: A data acquisition module for real-time collecting soil basic parameters and real-time environmental parameters, the soil basic parameters including soil humidity, slope, and aspect, and the real-time environmental parameters including vegetation coverage rate, root depth, rainfall, and runoff; A soil stability calculation module for calculating soil stability according to the real-time environmental parameters; A soil erosion risk assessment module for calculating the soil erosion risk according to the calculated soil stability and real-time environmental parameters such as rainfall and runoff; A soil stability scoring module for calculating the soil stability score according to the soil erosion risk assessment result; A vegetation restoration ability assessment module for assessing the vegetation restoration ability of the region; A regional soil and water conservation efficiency assessment module for calculating the regional soil and water conservation efficiency according to the soil stability score, the vegetation restoration ability, and the soil erosion risk assessment result; An early warning judgment module for determining whether to trigger a soil erosion early warning according to the regional soil and water conservation efficiency and the soil stability score.

Images