A method and device for evaluating single-engine failure reflight climb performance of a transport aircraft

By evaluating the roll, pitch and yaw moment balancing drag coefficients of a blown flap powered lift transport aircraft when a single engine fails, the difficult problem of calculating the climb performance of a blown flap powered lift transport aircraft when a single engine fails during a go-around is solved, and a fast and accurate climb gradient assessment is achieved, thereby improving aircraft design efficiency.

CN119783257BActive Publication Date: 2025-10-21XIAN AIRCRAFT DESIGN INST OF AVIATION IND OF CHINA
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202411883633.1
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-12-19
Publication Date
2025-10-21
Estimated Expiration
2044-12-19

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing technologies are unable to effectively calculate the go-around climb performance of a blown flap powered high-lift aircraft in the event of a single engine failure, especially the effects of rolling moment, pitching moment and yaw moment on drag, which makes it difficult to calculate the go-around climb gradient.

Method used

A method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single-engine failure go-around is provided. The method determines the drag coefficients generated by the roll, pitch, and yaw moment trims due to a single-engine failure and combines them with a formula to calculate the maximum climb gradient. The method includes a roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, a pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination module, and a yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module.

Benefits of technology

The system has achieved rapid and accurate calculation of the climb gradient of a single-engine failure go-around of a powered lift transport aircraft with blown flaps, which improves the efficiency of aircraft design and ensures that the aircraft design meets the go-around performance requirements.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN119783257B_ABST
    Figure CN119783257B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The application belongs to the technical field of aircraft design, and particularly relates to a method and device for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft after single-engine failure, and is applied to a lower surface air-blowing flap powered lift transport aircraft. The method comprises the following steps: S1, determining the drag coefficient generated by single-engine failure roll moment trim; S2, determining the drag coefficient generated by single-engine failure pitch moment trim; S3, determining the drag coefficient generated by single-engine failure yaw moment trim; and S4, calculating the maximum climb gradient after single-engine failure. The application can quickly and accurately calculate the climb gradient of the air-blowing flap powered lift transport aircraft after single-engine failure, and improves the aircraft design efficiency.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application belongs to the field of aircraft design technology, and in particular relates to a method and device for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single-engine failure go-around. Background Art

[0002] An engine failure in a powered-lift aircraft with blown flaps generates rolling and yawing moments, while the trimming moment creates additional drag. The thrust-generated pitching moment increase is much greater than on conventional aircraft, increasing the pitching moment trim drag. The engine jet is deflected downward by the flaps, reducing available thrust. The engine's dynamic response also affects the available thrust for a go-around. Conventional algorithms are unsuitable for calculating the climb gradient for a single-engine-failure go-around on a powered-lift aircraft with blown flaps. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In order to solve the above problems, the present application provides a method and device for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure and a go-around, providing technical support for the evaluation of the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure and a powered lift boost with lower surface blown flaps.

[0004] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single-engine failure go-around, which is applied to a powered high-lift transport aircraft with blown flaps on the lower surface. The method comprises:

[0005] Step S1: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the rolling moment trim due to a single engine failure. Da ;

[0006] Step S2: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitching moment trim due to a single engine failure. De ;

[0007] Step S3: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure. Dr ;

[0008] Step S4: Calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula: max :

[0009]

[0010] Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, P max is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xzK is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in the non-powered lift state, C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under all-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

[0011] Preferably, in step S1, the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure rolling moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Da :

[0012]

[0013] Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδa is the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

[0014] Preferably, step S2 further comprises:

[0015] Step S21: Determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect mp ;

[0016] Step S22: Determine the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ;

[0017] Step S23: Determine the pitch moment coefficient C for the missed approach climb using the following formula: m :

[0018] C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, Cmoff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state;

[0019] Step S24: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure pitching moment trim using the following formula: De :

[0020] C De =C Dδe δ e ;

[0021]

[0022] Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

[0023] Preferably, in step S21, the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp :

[0024]

[0025] Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

[0026] Preferably, in step S22, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb :

[0027]

[0028] Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are placed, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length at the engine installation position.

[0029] Preferably, in step S3, the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure is determined according to the following formula:Dr :

[0030]

[0031] Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

[0032] Preferably, step S4 further includes determining the drag coefficient dynamic influence correction value C by the following formula: Db :

[0033]

[0034] Among them, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, K is the correction coefficient.

[0035] Preferably, in step S4, the airspeed V of the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

[0036] A second aspect of the present application provides a transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device, which is applied to a power-assisted high-lift transport aircraft with blown flaps on the lower surface. The device comprises:

[0037] Roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by single engine failure roll moment trim Da ;

[0038] Pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by pitch moment trim when a single engine fails De ;

[0039] Yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by yaw moment trim in case of single engine failure Dr ;

[0040] The maximum climb gradient determination module is used to calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula max :

[0041]

[0042] Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, Pmax is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xz K is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in non-powered lift mode, C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under full-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

[0043] Preferably, in the roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by the roll moment trim due to a single engine failure is determined according to the following formula: Da :

[0044]

[0045] Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδa is the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

[0046] Preferably, the pitching moment trim drag coefficient determination module includes:

[0047] The first pitch moment coefficient increment determining unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect. mp ;

[0048] The second pitch moment coefficient increment determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ;

[0049] The pitch moment coefficient determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient C for missed approach climb using the following formula m :

[0050] C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, C moff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state;

[0051] The pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination unit is used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitch moment trim of a single engine failure using the following formula De :

[0052] C De =C Dδe δ e ;

[0053]

[0054] Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

[0055] Preferably, in the first pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp :

[0056]

[0057] Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

[0058] Preferably, in the second pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb :

[0059]

[0060] Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are placed, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length at the engine installation position.

[0061] Preferably, in the yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim of a single engine failure is determined according to the following formula: Dr :

[0062]

[0063] Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

[0064] Preferably, the maximum climb gradient determination module further includes a drag coefficient dynamic influence correction value calculation unit for determining the drag coefficient dynamic influence correction value C by the following formula: Db :

[0065]

[0066] Among them, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, and K is the correction coefficient.

[0067] Preferably, in the maximum climb gradient determination module, the airspeed V for the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

[0068] A third aspect of the present application provides a computer device, comprising a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single-engine failure and a go-around as described above.

[0069] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a readable storage medium storing a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it is used to implement the transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation method as described above.

[0070] The present application can quickly and accurately calculate the climb gradient of a blown flap powered lift transport aircraft during a single-engine failure go-around, thereby improving aircraft design efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0071] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of a preferred embodiment of the method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around of the present application.

[0072] Figure 2 It is a structural diagram of a computer device suitable for implementing the embodiments of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0073] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the implementation of this application clearer, the technical solutions in the implementation of this application will be described in more detail below in conjunction with the drawings in the implementation of this application. In the drawings, the same or similar numbers throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements with the same or similar functions. The described implementation is a part of the implementation of this application, not all of the implementations. The implementation described below with reference to the drawings is exemplary and is intended to be used to explain this application, and should not be understood as a limitation on this application. Based on the implementation in this application, all other implementations obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of this application. The implementation of this application is described in detail below in conjunction with the drawings.

[0074] The first aspect of the present application provides a method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure and a go-around, which is applied to a transport aircraft with a powered lift booster with blown flaps on the lower surface, such as Figure 1 As shown, the method mainly includes:

[0075] Step S1: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the rolling moment trim due to a single engine failure. Da ;

[0076] Step S2: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitching moment trim due to a single engine failure. De ;

[0077] Step S3: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure. Dr ;

[0078] Step S4: Calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula: max :

[0079]

[0080] Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, P max is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xz K is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in the non-powered lift state (untrim), C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under full-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

[0081] In some optional embodiments, in step S1, the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure rolling moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Da :

[0082]

[0083] Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδa is the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

[0084] In some optional embodiments, step S2 further includes:

[0085] Step S21: Determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect mp ;

[0086] Step S22: Determine the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ;

[0087] Step S23: Determine the pitch moment coefficient C for the missed approach climb using the following formula: m :

[0088] C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, C moff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state;

[0089] Step S24: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure pitching moment trim using the following formula: De :

[0090] C De =C Dδe δ e ;

[0091]

[0092] Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

[0093] In some optional embodiments, in step S21, the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp :

[0094]

[0095] Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

[0096] In some optional embodiments, in step S22, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb :

[0097]

[0098] Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are extended, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length (flaps extended) at the engine installation position.

[0099] In some optional embodiments, in step S3, the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure yaw moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Dr :

[0100]

[0101] Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

[0102] In some optional embodiments, step S4 further includes determining the drag coefficient dynamic influence correction value C by the following formula: Db :

[0103]

[0104] Among them, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, K is the correction coefficient.

[0105] In this step, K is a function of K4 and is obtained by interpolation operation. The required interpolation data is shown in Table 1 below.

[0106] Table 1 Data required for parameter K interpolation

[0107] <![CDATA[(K4) 2 ]]> 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 K 0 0.001 0.003 0.012 0.02 0.027 0.037 0.05 0.058 0.07 0.85 0.1

[0108] In the above table, the value of K4 can be calculated by the following formula:

[0109]

[0110] Among them, interp1 is a one-dimensional interpolation function.

[0111] In some optional embodiments, in step S4, the airspeed V for the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

[0112] This application can determine whether the aircraft design meets the requirements based on the final calculated maximum climb gradient of the aircraft's go-around. If it does not meet the requirements, the parameters involved in the above calculation process can be redesigned and assigned values, thereby accelerating the efficiency of aircraft design.

[0113] The example aircraft uses the lower surface blown flap power lift technology, and the aircraft reference wing area is 353m 2 , wingspan of 50.6m, aspect ratio of 7.25, wing quarter chord sweep angle of 21°, tip-to-root ratio of 0.24. Four high-bypass turbofan engines are hung under the wings of the aircraft, each with a thrust of 185.5KN. The engine thrust axis has a downward deflection angle of -3° relative to the fuselage. The span-wise installation position of the inner engine is 29.6% of the half span, where the wing section installation angle is 3°, and the span-wise installation position of the outer engine is 55% of the half span, where the wing section installation angle is 2.5°. Aircraft go-around configuration: leading edge slat deflection angle of 20°, trailing edge double-slotted Fuller flap deflection angle of 20°+10°, the diameter of the jet at the trailing edge of the flap D j The depth of the flap immersed in the engine jet is 2.605m. The engine jet efficiency factor is 0.8699, and the jet downward deflection angle is 18.37°.

[0114] Calculation status: The aircraft weight for go-around is 200t, the engine failure speed is 80m / s, and the go-around acceleration is 0. First, in step S1, the drag coefficient C generated by the rolling moment trim due to single engine failure is calculated. Da is 0.0201, and then in step S2 the drag coefficient C generated by the pitching moment trim due to single engine failure is calculated. De is 0.0083, and then in step S3 the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure is calculated. Dr is 0.0086. Finally, the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around is calculated according to the formula in step S4. max The maximum climb gradient for the example aircraft during a go-around is 3.62%, which meets the 2.7% climb gradient requirement for a transport aircraft with a single engine failure.

[0115] In a second aspect, the present application provides a transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climb performance evaluation device corresponding to the above method, which is applied to a power-assisted high-lift transport aircraft with blown flaps on the lower surface. The device comprises:

[0116] Roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by single engine failure roll moment trimDa ;

[0117] Pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by pitch moment trim when a single engine fails De ;

[0118] Yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by yaw moment trim in case of single engine failure Dr ;

[0119] The maximum climb gradient determination module is used to calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula max :

[0120]

[0121] Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, P max is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xz K is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in non-powered lift mode, C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under full-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

[0122] In some optional embodiments, in the roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by the roll moment trim due to a single engine failure is determined according to the following formula: Da :

[0123]

[0124] Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδais the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

[0125] In some optional implementations, the pitching moment trim drag coefficient determination module includes:

[0126] The first pitch moment coefficient increment determining unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect. mp ;

[0127] The second pitch moment coefficient increment determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ;

[0128] The pitch moment coefficient determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient C for missed approach climb using the following formula m :

[0129] C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, C moff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state;

[0130] The pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination unit is used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitch moment trim of a single engine failure using the following formula De :

[0131] C De =C Dδe δ e ;

[0132]

[0133] Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

[0134] In some optional embodiments, in the first pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp :

[0135]

[0136] Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

[0137] In some optional embodiments, in the second pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb :

[0138]

[0139] Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are placed, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length at the engine installation position.

[0140] In some optional embodiments, in the yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by single engine failure yaw moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Dr :

[0141]

[0142] Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

[0143] In some optional embodiments, the maximum climb gradient determination module further includes a drag coefficient power influence correction value calculation unit, which is used to determine the drag coefficient power influence correction value C by the following formula: Db :

[0144]

[0145] Among them, CLb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, and K is the correction coefficient.

[0146] In some optional embodiments, in the maximum climb gradient determination module, the airspeed V for the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

[0147] In a third aspect of the present application, a computer device includes a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement a method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single-engine failure go-around.

[0148] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a readable storage medium storing a computer program. When executed by a processor, the computer program is used to implement the above-described method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure and a missed approach. The computer-readable storage medium may be included in the apparatus described in the above-described embodiments, or it may exist independently and not be incorporated into the apparatus. The computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs, and when executed by the apparatus, the one or more programs process data according to the above-described method.

[0149] Reference below Figure 2 , which shows a structural diagram of a computer device 400 suitable for implementing the embodiments of the present application. Figure 2 The computer device shown is only an example and should not limit the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0150] like Figure 2 As shown, computer device 400 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 401, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 402 or a program loaded from a storage portion 408 into a random access memory (RAM) 403. Various programs and data required for the operation of device 400 are also stored in RAM 403. CPU 401, ROM 402, and RAM 403 are connected to each other via a bus 404. An input / output (I / O) interface 405 is also connected to bus 404.

[0151] The following components are connected to the I / O interface 405: an input section 406 including a keyboard, a mouse, and the like; an output section 407 including devices such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), and a speaker; a storage section 408 including a hard disk; and a communication section 409 including a network interface card such as a LAN card or a modem. The communication section 409 performs communication processing via a network such as the Internet. A drive 410 is also connected to the I / O interface 405 as needed. Removable media 411, such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, or a semiconductor memory, is installed in the drive 410 as needed, so that computer programs read therefrom can be installed into the storage section 408 as needed.

[0152] In particular, according to the embodiment of the present application, the process described above with reference to the flowchart can be implemented as a computer software program. For example, the embodiment of the present application includes a computer program product, which includes a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, and the computer program includes a program code for executing the method shown in the flowchart. In such an embodiment, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from the network through the communication part 409, and / or installed from the removable medium 411. When the computer program is executed by the central processing unit (CPU) 401, the above functions defined in the method of the present application are executed. It should be noted that the computer storage medium of the present application can be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium or any combination of the above two. The computer-readable storage medium can be, for example, but not limited to, a system, device or component of electricity, magnetism, light, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor, or any combination of the above. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to, an electrical connection having one or more conductors, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In this application, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In this application, a computer-readable signal medium may include a data signal propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, which carries computer-readable program code. Such a propagated data signal may take a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer-readable signal medium may also be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium that can transmit, propagate, or transfer a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The program code embodied on a computer-readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including, but not limited to, wireless, wire, optical cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination thereof.

[0153] The flow charts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible architecture, functions and operations of the systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each box in the flow chart or block diagram can represent a module, program segment or a part of code, and the module, program segment or a part of code includes one or more executable instructions for realizing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in a sequence different from that marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram and / or flow chart, and the combination of the boxes in the block diagram and / or flow chart can be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or can be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0154] The modules or units described in the embodiments of this application may be implemented in software or hardware. The modules or units described may also be provided in a processor, and the names of these modules or units do not, in certain circumstances, limit the modules or units themselves.

[0155] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of the present application, but the scope of protection of the present application is not limited thereto. Any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by a person skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed in this application should be included in the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present application should be based on the scope of protection of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around, applied to a powered high-lift transport aircraft with blown flaps on the lower surface, characterized in that: The method includes: Step S1: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the rolling moment trim due to a single engine failure. Da ; Step S2: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitching moment trim due to a single engine failure. De ; Step S3: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure. Dr ; Step S4: Calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula: max : Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, P max is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xz K is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in the non-powered lift state, C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under all-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

2. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 1, wherein: In step S1, the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure rolling moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Da : Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδa is the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

3. The method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 1, wherein: Step S2 further comprises: Step S21: Determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect mp ; Step S22: Determine the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ; Step S23: Determine the pitch moment coefficient C for the missed approach climb using the following formula: m : C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, C moff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state; Step S24: Determine the drag coefficient C generated by the single engine failure pitching moment trim using the following formula: De : C De =C Dδe d e ; Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

4. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 3, wherein: In step S21, the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp : Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

5. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 3, wherein: In step S22, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb : Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are placed, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length at the engine installation position.

6. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 1, wherein: In step S3, the drag coefficient C generated by the yaw moment trim due to single engine failure is determined according to the following formula: Dr : Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

7. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 1, wherein: Step S4 further includes determining the drag coefficient dynamic influence correction value C by the following formula: Db : Among them, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, and K is the correction coefficient.

8. The method for evaluating the climbing performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure go-around according to claim 1, wherein: In step S4, the airspeed V for the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

9. A transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device, applied to a transport aircraft with a powered lift booster with blown flaps on the lower surface, characterized in that: The device includes: Roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by single engine failure roll moment trim Da ; Pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by pitch moment trim when a single engine fails De ; Yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by yaw moment trim in case of single engine failure Dr ; The maximum climb gradient determination module is used to calculate the maximum climb gradient tanθ for a single-engine failure go-around based on the following formula max : Among them, θ max The maximum flight path angle for landing and going around, n e is the number of engines, P max is the maximum thrust of the engine, P maxf is the maximum available thrust of the engine after correction for system power extraction, speed and altitude, K S is the system power extraction factor, K V is the speed correction factor of thrust, K h is the height correction factor, P xz K is the engine thrust after the throttle lever is pushed from air idle to maximum position for 8 seconds. t is the thrust recovery factor, with a maximum value of 1, α is the fuselage angle of attack, η j is the jet efficiency factor of the engine in the lift-increasing state, θ j is the downward deflection angle of the jet flow disturbed by the flap relative to the fuselage axis, q is the velocity pressure, ρ is the air density, V is the airspeed of the go-around, S ref is the wing reference area, W is the aircraft weight, C Don is the lift coefficient in the lift-increasing state, C Doff is the drag coefficient for takeoff in the non-powered lift state, C Db is the power effect correction value of the drag coefficient under all-engine go-around, C DLG is the drag coefficient of the landing gear.

10. The transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 9, characterized in that: In the roll moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by the roll moment trim of a single engine failure is determined according to the following formula: Da : Among them, δ a Aileron deflection angle for rolling moment balancing, C Dδa is the increase in drag coefficient caused by aileron unit deflection angle, C l is the rolling moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C lδa is the aileron control efficiency, ΔC L is the loss of lift coefficient of the wing on the side of the failed engine, L ye is the span length between the axis of the failed engine and the axis of the fuselage, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flow flaps during all-engine go-around, b w The wing span.

11. The transport aircraft single engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 9, characterized in that: The pitching moment trim drag coefficient determination module includes: The first pitch moment coefficient increment determining unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect. mp ; The second pitch moment coefficient increment determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow mb ; The pitch moment coefficient determination unit is used to determine the pitch moment coefficient C for missed approach climb using the following formula m : C m =C moff +C mp +C mb Among them, C moff The pitching moment for takeoff climb in non-powered-up state; The pitch moment trim drag coefficient determination unit is used to determine the drag coefficient C generated by the pitch moment trim of a single engine failure using the following formula De : C De =C Dδe d e ; Among them, δ e Elevator deflection angle to balance the pitch moment, C Dδe is the drag coefficient generated by the unit deflection angle of the elevator, C mδe The control efficiency of the elevator.

12. The transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 11, characterized in that: In the first pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet vector effect is determined by the following formula: mp : Among them, C T is the thrust coefficient for takeoff of an aircraft with one engine failure, θ e is the downward deflection angle of the engine axis relative to the fuselage axis, h cf L is the vertical distance of the flap aerodynamic pressure center below the center of gravity, f The axial distance behind the center of gravity of the flap's aerodynamic pressure center, h e is the vertical distance of the engine nozzle below the center of gravity, L e is the axial distance of the engine nozzle behind the center of gravity, c a is the average aerodynamic chord length of the wing.

13. The transport aircraft single engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 11, characterized in that: In the second pitching moment coefficient increment determining unit, the pitching moment coefficient increment C generated by the jet flap flow is determined by the following formula: mb : Among them, L0 is the axial distance between the leading edge of the wing and the center of gravity of the fuselage at the engine installation position. It is positive if it is located behind the center of gravity. L c is the axial distance behind the center of gravity of the wing's aerodynamic pressure center after the flaps are placed, and c' is the axial projection length of the wing's chord length at the engine installation position.

14. The transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 9, characterized in that: In the yaw moment trim drag coefficient determination module, the drag coefficient C generated by single engine failure yaw moment trim is determined according to the following formula: Dr : Among them, δ r The rudder deflection angle to balance the yaw moment, C Dδr is the drag coefficient generated by the rudder unit deflection angle, C n is the yaw moment coefficient caused by single engine failure, C nδr The control efficiency of the rudder.

15. The transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 9, characterized in that: The maximum climb gradient determination module further includes a drag coefficient power influence correction value calculation unit for determining the drag coefficient power influence correction value C by the following formula: Db : Among them, C Lb is the lift coefficient increment generated by the jet flap flow, C La C Lb The incremental correction part of the lift coefficient at medium angle of attack, AR is the aspect ratio, K is the correction coefficient.

16. The transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation device according to claim 9, characterized in that: In the maximum climb gradient determination module, the airspeed V for the go-around is set to be no less than 1.23 times the stall speed of the aircraft.

17. A computer device, characterized in that: The method comprises a processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the method for evaluating the climb performance of a transport aircraft with a single engine failure and a go-around according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

18. A readable storage medium storing a computer program, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, it is used to implement the transport aircraft single-engine failure go-around climbing performance evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 8.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Aircraft digital virtual flight simulation computing system for evaluating airworthiness of passenger aircraft

    CN109063256A

  • Method for evaluating the power augmentation effect of an outward blowing type flap layout aircraft

    CN109614644A