Online evaluation system
By designing an online evaluation system, it provides flexible evaluation management and powerful data analysis functions, and solves the problems of poor user experience, inflexible evaluation process, and limited data analysis capabilities in the existing online evaluation system, achieving more efficient and high-quality educational evaluation.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202510095281.1
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-01-21
- Publication Date
- 2025-04-18
AI Technical Summary
The existing online evaluation system has poor user experience, inflexible evaluation process, and limited data analysis capabilities.
Design an online evaluation system, including the administrator, the student and the teacher, to provide flexible evaluation management, data processing and graphical statistical reporting functions. The administrator side is used to set evaluation plans, create evaluation indicators, edit questionnaires and set scoring standards; the student side and the teacher side are used to fill out evaluation questionnaires, summarize data and generate statistical reports. The system uses data preprocessing, weighted average calculation and data aggregation to generate display data.
It improves the user experience and flexibility of the online evaluation system, enhances data analysis capabilities, improves the efficiency and quality of educational evaluation, and overcomes the shortcomings of paper management.
Smart Images
Figure CN119849982A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of online evaluation systems, and in particular to an online evaluation system. Background Art
[0002] With the development of information technology, more and more educational institutions have begun to adopt online evaluation systems to conduct course evaluation, student performance assessment, and other tasks.
[0003] Existing online evaluation systems usually include functions such as question bank management, questionnaire surveys, and score statistics. However, such systems often have some limitations, such as poor user experience, inflexible evaluation process, and limited data analysis capabilities. Summary of the invention
[0004] The purpose of this application is to provide an online evaluation system to solve the problems of online evaluation systems in the prior art, such as poor user experience, inflexible evaluation process, and limited data analysis capabilities.
[0005] To achieve the above purpose, the embodiment of the present application provides an online evaluation system, including: an administrator terminal, a student terminal, and a teacher terminal, wherein: The administrator terminal is used to set the evaluation schedule, set the evaluation plan, create evaluation indicators, edit the evaluation questionnaire and set the scoring criteria, organize the evaluation team, assign permissions, publish evaluation tasks, summarize evaluation data, provide graphical statistical reports and publish evaluation statistical reports; The student terminal is used to provide an evaluation questionnaire filling page and a course evaluation questionnaire filling page, obtain and summarize evaluation data, and provide a graphical statistical report; The teacher terminal is used to provide an evaluation questionnaire filling page and a course evaluation questionnaire filling page, obtain and summarize evaluation data, and provide a graphical statistical report; Before providing the graphical statistical report on the administrator side, the student side and the instructor side, it also includes: processing and displaying the evaluation data, specifically including: preprocessing the acquired evaluation data, performing weighted average calculation on the preprocessed evaluation data to obtain the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension, performing data aggregation, and generating display data.
[0006] Optionally, the administrator terminal is also used to manage the evaluation team members participating in the evaluation, including adding and deleting members, and assigning different permissions.
[0007] Optionally, the preprocessing of the acquired evaluation data specifically includes: Remove invalid data or missing values, and classify the collected original evaluation data according to evaluation object, evaluation dimension, and evaluator type.
[0008] Optionally, the evaluation dimensions include teaching quality, teaching attitude, and teaching methods.
[0009] Optionally, the evaluator types include students and teachers.
[0010] Optionally, performing weighted average calculation on the preprocessed evaluation data to obtain a weighted average score for each evaluation dimension specifically includes: For each evaluation dimension, different weights are set for each evaluator's score according to the importance of the evaluator, and the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension is calculated. The calculation formula is: Weighted average score = sum of the scores of the same type of evaluation results / number of valid evaluations of the same type × ∑ (weight).
[0011] Optionally, the data aggregation to generate display data specifically includes: For different types of evaluators, their respective weighted average scores are calculated, and the scores of the teachers under each weight in this evaluation plan are calculated to generate display data.
[0012] The embodiments of the present application have the following advantages: By introducing information management, the above system provides an online evaluation system that is more flexible, easy to use and has powerful data analysis capabilities to improve the efficiency and quality of education evaluation while overcoming the shortcomings of paper management.
[0013] Users of this system can use a simple and clear interface and a common browser on the client side to conduct a comprehensive online evaluation of classroom teaching activities quickly and conveniently.
[0014] The evaluation index function of this system provides more diverse questionnaire question creation, which can meet all types of questionnaire surveys on the market, including structured questionnaires, unstructured questionnaires, free narrative questionnaires, dual comparison questionnaires, etc. This system uses student evaluation to evaluate a given evaluation object, and the evaluation method adopts a combination of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation. The statistics of evaluation data provide feedback at different levels. Feedback information is given based on the weighted statistical results of the collected evaluation data. The setting of evaluation indicators can comprehensively and objectively reflect the quality of classroom teaching. Through the setting of a series of teaching evaluation indicators, the quality of classroom teaching can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed from two major aspects: horizontal and vertical. The system should be scalable, practical and universal. It should be able to be expanded relatively easily and quickly with the development of teaching and technology, and it should be practical and operational in the evaluation of classroom teaching activities, and the corresponding software can be reused.
[0015] This system has a multi-dimensional evaluation method, including peer evaluation (including leadership observation) and student evaluation. Evaluation is conducted in groups according to job title level. Meaningful feedback at different levels is provided. The evaluation form and questionnaire are concisely designed, easy to judge, and can effectively collect data; the setting of evaluation indicators combines subjective and objective factors, making the feedback information more comprehensive and accurate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] In order to more clearly illustrate the implementation methods of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for the implementation methods or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only exemplary, and for ordinary technicians in this field, other implementation drawings can be derived from the provided drawings without creative work.
[0017] Figure 1 A functional diagram of an online evaluation system provided for at least one embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] The following is a description of the implementation of the present application by specific specific embodiments. People familiar with the technology can easily understand other advantages and effects of the present application from the contents disclosed in this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present application.
[0019] It should be noted that the steps in the claims and description of the present application may be executed substantially in parallel or in reverse order under appropriate circumstances, depending on the functions involved.
[0020] In addition, the technical features involved in the different embodiments of the present application described below can be combined with each other as long as they do not conflict with each other.
[0021] An embodiment of the present application provides an online evaluation system. Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a functional diagram of an online evaluation system provided in at least one embodiment of the present application. It should be understood that the system may also include additional boxes not shown and / or the boxes shown may be omitted, and the scope of the present application is not limited in this respect.
[0022] This system is divided into administrator side, teacher side, and student side, including PC and mobile terminals.
[0023] Administrator side functions Evaluation plan: This function allows administrators to set the evaluation schedule, set the evaluation plan, create evaluation indicators, edit the evaluation questionnaire and set the scoring criteria, organize the evaluation team, assign permissions, publish evaluation tasks, summarize the evaluation data, provide graphical statistical reports and publish evaluation statistical reports.
[0024] Student side functions: Evaluation participation: Provide an evaluation questionnaire filling page to provide real feedback from students on their evaluation of a certain instructor.
[0025] Evaluation statistics: Summarize evaluation data and provide graphical statistical reports.
[0026] Course evaluation: Provides a page for filling out the course evaluation questionnaire, where students can put forward their own suggestions and opinions on a certain course.
[0027] Teacher side functions: Evaluation participation: Provides an evaluation questionnaire filling page, teachers' evaluation of a certain teacher, and peer evaluation to more accurately provide suggestions and opinions for the teaching staff.
[0028] Evaluation statistics: Summarize evaluation data, provide graphical statistical reports, and provide students and peers with a second graphical statistical report of themselves.
[0029] Course evaluation: Provides a page for filling out course evaluation questionnaires, where teachers can provide their own suggestions and opinions on a course.
[0030] Specifically, the system consists of an online learning platform, a mobile terminal, and a backend management system. Users access the system on the client side through a common browser, and the administrator sets the course evaluation content and permissions in the backend management system, which are stored on the training server. Students complete the evaluation tasks through the student terminal, and the evaluation results are fed back to the backend management system for statistical analysis.
[0031] In some embodiments, the administrator terminal is also used to manage the evaluation team members participating in the evaluation, including adding and deleting members, and assigning different permissions.
[0032] Specifically, after the administrator logs in to the backend management system, the administrator is allowed to create evaluation topics, edit evaluation questionnaires, and set scoring standards. Specific evaluation tasks are assigned to evaluation team members and corresponding students. Evaluation data is summarized and graphical statistical reports are provided to help analyze evaluation results. The set timetable is used to control the start and end time of the evaluation, the evaluation questionnaire is selected from the evaluation indicator function, and the scoring standard is used to set the evaluation ratio of different user groups.
[0033] Specifically, the evaluation plan refers to the pre-set time schedule for evaluation activities. Evaluation indicators: the standards used to measure various aspects of the evaluation object. Evaluation team: a team of multiple participants who work together to complete the evaluation work. Evaluation tasks: specific work items assigned to the evaluation team. Evaluation statistics: the process of summarizing and analyzing the evaluation results.
[0034] Specifically, after students log in to the student-side system, since the evaluation tasks have been published on the management side, students can obtain their corresponding evaluation tasks in the evaluation participation. The evaluation task content has been set by the administrator in the evaluation plan, so students can more efficiently obtain what they want to evaluate and complete the evaluation task. Obtain personal evaluation statistics in the evaluation statistics.
[0035] Specifically, after the teacher logs in to the teacher-side system, since the evaluation task has been released on the management side, the teacher can obtain his corresponding evaluation task in the evaluation participation, where the evaluation task content has been set by the administrator in the evaluation plan, and the students can more efficiently obtain what they want to evaluate and complete the evaluation task. Personal evaluation statistics are obtained in the evaluation statistics, where teachers can also actively evaluate other teachers. The selected evaluation content is limited by the evaluation indicators of the administrator side, and the scope of evaluation candidates is limited to all teachers.
[0036] In some embodiments, the system uses a self-developed intelligent algorithm that can quickly and accurately generate personal evaluation data. The entire evaluation process does not require human intervention and the evaluation results are accurate, objective and reliable. The statistical results are calculated according to the time and weights preset in the evaluation plan.
[0037] Before providing the statistical report in the form of a chart, the online evaluation system uses the following algorithm to process and display the evaluation data: 1. Data preprocessing: After the end time preset in the evaluation plan, the acquired evaluation data is preprocessed, including: removing invalid data or missing values, and classifying the collected original evaluation data according to the evaluation object, evaluation dimension, and evaluator type (student or instructor).
[0038] In some embodiments, the evaluation dimensions include teaching quality, teaching attitude, teaching methods, etc.
[0039] In some embodiments, the evaluator types include students and instructors.
[0040] 2. Weighted average calculation: For each evaluation dimension, different weights are set for each evaluator's score according to the importance of the evaluator (for example, peer evaluation may be more important than student evaluation). The weight is set in advance in the evaluation plan, and the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension is calculated as follows: Weighted average score = sum of the scores of the same type of evaluation results / number of valid evaluations of the same type × ∑ (weight).
[0041] 3. Data Aggregation: For different types of evaluators, calculate their respective weighted average scores. Calculate the scores of teachers under each weight in this evaluation plan and generate display data.
[0042] Through the above system, a given evaluation object is evaluated by using student evaluation, and the evaluation method is a combination of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation. This can not only obtain direct feedback from the student's perspective, but also verify the effectiveness of the evaluation through objective data, and increase peer evaluation content to provide meaningful feedback at different levels.
[0043] Feedback information is given based on the weighted statistical results of the collected evaluation data. The system can provide personalized feedback reports based on the needs of users at different levels, helping teachers and management to better understand the teaching effect.
[0044] The setting of evaluation indicators can comprehensively and objectively reflect the quality of classroom teaching. Through the setting of a series of teaching evaluation indicators, the quality of classroom teaching can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed from two major aspects: horizontally (such as teaching quality, teaching attitude, teaching methods, etc.) and vertically (such as performance in different semesters and different courses).
[0045] The present application may be a method, an apparatus, a system and / or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer-readable storage medium carrying computer-readable program instructions for executing various aspects of the present application.
[0046] Computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can hold and store instructions used by an instruction execution device. Computer readable storage medium can be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. More specific examples (non-exhaustive list) of computer readable storage medium include: a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanical encoding device, for example, a punch card or a convex structure in a groove on which instructions are stored, and any suitable combination thereof. The computer readable storage medium used here is not interpreted as a transient signal itself, such as a radio wave or other freely propagating electromagnetic wave, an electromagnetic wave propagated by a waveguide or other transmission medium (for example, a light pulse by an optical fiber cable), or an electrical signal transmitted by a wire.
[0047] The computer-readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded from a computer-readable storage medium to each computing / processing device, or downloaded to an external computer or external storage device via a network, such as the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network, and / or a wireless network. The network can include copper transmission cables, optical fiber transmissions, wireless transmissions, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers, and / or edge servers. The network adapter card or network interface in each computing / processing device receives the computer-readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer-readable program instructions for storage in the computer-readable storage medium in each computing / processing device.
[0048] The computer program instructions for performing the operation of the present application may be assembly instructions, instruction set architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine-related instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state setting data, or source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including object-oriented programming languages, such as Smalltalk, C++, etc., and conventional procedural programming languages, such as "C" language or similar programming languages. Computer-readable program instructions may be executed entirely on a user's computer, partially on a user's computer, as an independent software package, partially on a user's computer, partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In the case of a remote computer, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer via any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computer (e.g., using an Internet service provider to connect via the Internet). In some embodiments, an electronic circuit, such as a programmable logic circuit, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or a programmable logic array (PLA), may be personalized by utilizing the state information of the computer-readable program instructions, and the electronic circuit may execute the computer-readable program instructions, thereby realizing various aspects of the present application.
[0049] Various aspects of the present application are described herein with reference to flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that each box in the flowchart and / or block diagram and the combination of boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram can be implemented by computer-readable program instructions.
Claims
1. An online evaluation system, characterized in that: include: Administrator side, student side, teacher side, among which, The administrator terminal is used to set the evaluation schedule, set the evaluation plan, create evaluation indicators, edit the evaluation questionnaire and set the scoring criteria, organize the evaluation team, assign permissions, publish evaluation tasks, summarize evaluation data, provide graphical statistical reports and publish evaluation statistical reports; The student terminal is used to provide an evaluation questionnaire filling page and a course evaluation questionnaire filling page, obtain and summarize evaluation data, and provide a graphical statistical report; The teacher terminal is used to provide an evaluation questionnaire filling page and a course evaluation questionnaire filling page, obtain and summarize evaluation data, and provide a graphical statistical report; Before providing the graphical statistical report on the administrator side, the student side and the instructor side, it also includes: processing and displaying the evaluation data, specifically including: preprocessing the acquired evaluation data, performing weighted average calculation on the preprocessed evaluation data to obtain the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension, performing data aggregation, and generating display data.
2. The online evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The administrator terminal is also used to manage the evaluation team members participating in the evaluation, including adding and deleting members, and assigning different permissions.
3. The online evaluation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The preprocessing of the acquired evaluation data specifically includes: Remove invalid data or missing values, and classify the collected original evaluation data according to evaluation object, evaluation dimension, and evaluator type.
4. The online evaluation system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The evaluation dimensions include teaching quality, teaching attitude, and teaching methods.
5. The online evaluation system according to claim 4, characterized in that: The evaluator types include students and instructors.
6. The online evaluation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The weighted average calculation of the preprocessed evaluation data to obtain the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension specifically includes: For each evaluation dimension, different weights are set for each evaluator's score according to the importance of the evaluator, and the weighted average score of each evaluation dimension is calculated. The calculation formula is: Weighted average score = sum of the scores of the same type of evaluation results / number of valid evaluations of the same type × ∑ (weight).
7. The online evaluation system according to claim 6, characterized in that: The data aggregation and generation of display data specifically include: For different types of evaluators, their respective weighted average scores are calculated, and the scores of the teachers under each weight in this evaluation plan are calculated to generate display data.