Method and system for evaluating maturity of innovation system of enterprise

Abstract

The invention discloses a maturity evaluation method and system for an innovation system of an enterprise. The maturity evaluation method comprises the following steps: matching a corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age limit of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test grade is defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model is compatible, multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model is achieved, and the accuracy of the self-test grade is guaranteed. Further, matching data combinations of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation mechanism, and defining an evaluation grade according to the plurality of data combinations, the evaluation logic and the evaluation weight; the method evaluates the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-test grade, the evaluation grade and the innovation system, is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-test grade, the evaluation grade and the innovation system, achieves the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-test grade, the evaluation grade and the innovation system, and guarantees the evaluation precision of the maturity of the innovation system.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of an enterprise's innovation system, and in particular to a maturity assessment method and system for an enterprise's innovation system. Background Art

[0002] With the development of science and technology, enterprises carry out various business activities in society, such as technology enterprises, financial enterprises, food enterprises, etc. Each enterprise has a corresponding innovation system and improves the core competitiveness of the enterprise according to the innovation system. In the existing technology, the innovation system is evaluated along a single dimension, and the evaluation agency is fully utilized for a single evaluation, and it is not compatible with the self-evaluation of the innovation system, resulting in the inability to achieve self-evaluation level, evaluation level and multi-dimensional evaluation of the innovation system, which affects the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system. Summary of the invention

[0003] The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art. The present invention provides a maturity assessment method and system for an enterprise's innovation system, which collects multiple evaluation data of the enterprise; matches the corresponding innovation system based on the multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; matches the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; defines the corresponding self-test level based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, is compatible with the overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, realizes multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, and ensures the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0004] Furthermore, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, and ensures the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0005] The embodiment of the present invention provides a maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system, which is applied to a maturity assessment scenario for an enterprise's innovation system;

[0006] The maturity assessment method of the enterprise's innovation system includes:

[0007] Collect multiple evaluation data of enterprises;

[0008] Match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the company's internal system;

[0009] Match the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, age of the enterprise and the type of enterprise;

[0010] Define the corresponding self-assessment levels based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-assessment model;

[0011] Match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category of the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight;

[0012] Assess the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system.

[0013] Optionally, the collecting of multiple evaluation data of the enterprise includes:

[0014] Collect the space where the enterprise is located;

[0015] Match the corresponding computer IP based on the space where the enterprise is located;

[0016] Transmit the corresponding evaluation table for each computer IP;

[0017] Collect corresponding data sets based on online evaluation of each evaluation form;

[0018] Associating the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score;

[0019] Multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are constructed based on the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field scores.

[0020] Optionally, the matching of the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise includes:

[0021] Freeze multiple evaluation data;

[0022] Define the space where the internal system is located based on the enterprise's traversal;

[0023] The internal system is defined according to the traversal of the space in which it resides;

[0024] Match multiple evaluation data and internal systems, and define corresponding matching coefficients;

[0025] Triggering dynamic adjustments of multiple evaluation data and internal systems based on the comparison results of the matching coefficient and the preset matching coefficient threshold;

[0026] Match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the company's internal system.

[0027] Optionally, matching the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise includes:

[0028] freeze frame innovation system;

[0029] Divide into multiple innovation categories based on the detection of the innovation system;

[0030] Associate multiple innovation categories, the age of the enterprise, and the type of enterprise;

[0031] A first model coefficient is defined according to a plurality of innovation categories and the age of the enterprise, and a second model coefficient is defined according to a plurality of innovation categories and the type of the enterprise;

[0032] A corresponding self-test model is defined based on the first model coefficient, the second model coefficient and the model type matched by the innovation system.

[0033] Optionally, the self-testing level defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-testing model includes:

[0034] Freeze-frame self-assessment model;

[0035] Linking innovation systems and corresponding self-test models;

[0036] Dynamically interact with the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0037] The corresponding self-assessment level is defined according to the dynamic interaction between the innovation system and the corresponding self-assessment model.

[0038] Optionally, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight, including:

[0039] Define the innovation system of enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions;

[0040] The innovation system of related enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions;

[0041] Dynamically interact with the enterprise's innovation system and the corresponding evaluation agency.

[0042] Optionally, the step of matching the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation institution, and defining the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights, further includes:

[0043] Define the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization;

[0044] The data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched based on the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization;

[0045] Associate multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; define evaluation levels based on multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights.

[0046] Optionally, the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system, including:

[0047] Fixed self-assessment level;

[0048] Collect self-test levels, evaluation levels and innovation systems;

[0049] Linking self-assessment levels, assessment levels, and innovation systems;

[0050] Dynamically interact with self-assessment levels, evaluation levels and innovation system.

[0051] Optionally, the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system evaluation may further include:

[0052] The first maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the assessment level, and the second maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the innovation system;

[0053] The maturity of the innovation system is assessed based on the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system.

[0054] In addition, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a maturity assessment system for an enterprise's innovation system, characterized in that the maturity assessment system for an enterprise's innovation system is applied to the maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system as described in any one of claims 1 to 9, and the maturity assessment system for an enterprise's innovation system comprises:

[0055] The collection module is used to collect multiple evaluation data of the enterprise;

[0056] System module, used to match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise;

[0057] The self-test module is used to match the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise;

[0058] The level module is used to define the corresponding self-test level based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0059] The evaluation module is used to match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight;

[0060] The maturity module is used to evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the assessment level and the innovation system.

[0061] In an embodiment of the present invention, through the method in the embodiment of the present invention, multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are collected; the corresponding innovation system is matched based on the multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test model is matched according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test level is defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, realizes the multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, and ensures the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0062] Furthermore, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, and ensures the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0063] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0064] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0065] Figure 2 is a flow chart of S11 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0066] Figure 3 is a flow chart of S12 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0067] Figure 4 is a flow chart of S13 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0068] Figure 5 is a flow chart of S14 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0069] Figure 6 is a flow chart of S15 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0070] Figure 7 is a flow chart of S16 in the maturity assessment method of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0071] Figure 8 Schematic diagram of the structure of the maturity evaluation system of the innovation system of an enterprise in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0072] Fig. 9 The figure is a hardware diagram of an electronic device according to an exemplary embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0073] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0074] See also Figures 1 to 9 , a maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system, applied to a maturity assessment scenario for an enterprise's innovation system; the maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system includes:

[0075] Step S11: Collect multiple evaluation data of the enterprise;

[0076] Step S12: matching a corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise;

[0077] Step S13: matching the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise;

[0078] Step S14: defining corresponding self-test levels based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0079] Step S15: Match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight;

[0080] Step S16: Evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the assessment level and the innovation system.

[0081] In an embodiment of the present invention, through the method in the embodiment of the present invention, multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are collected; the corresponding innovation system is matched based on the multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test model is matched according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test level is defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, realizes the multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, and ensures the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0082] Furthermore, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, and ensures the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0083] refer to Figure 2 , in step S11, collecting multiple evaluation data of the enterprise;

[0084] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0085] S111: The space where the enterprise is located;

[0086] S112: Match the corresponding computer IP based on the space where the enterprise is located;

[0087] S113: Transmitting a corresponding evaluation table to each computer IP;

[0088] S114: collecting corresponding data sets based on the online evaluation of each evaluation form;

[0089] S115: Associating the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score;

[0090] S116: Construct multiple evaluation data of the enterprise according to the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field scores.

[0091] In an embodiment of the present application, the space where the enterprise is located is collected and introduced to control the space where the enterprise is located. At the same time, the corresponding computer IP is matched based on the space where the enterprise is located; the corresponding evaluation form is transmitted to each computer IP, and the synchronous transmission of the evaluation form is realized, so as to facilitate the effective evaluation of each evaluation form.

[0092] Therefore, corresponding data sets are collected based on the online evaluation of each evaluation form, and the online evaluation of each evaluation form is realized, ensuring the management and control of the data set. At the same time, the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score are associated; multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are constructed according to the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score, and realizes the multi-dimensional control of the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score, ensuring the accuracy of multiple evaluation data of the enterprise.

[0093] refer to Figure 3 , in step S12, matching a corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise;

[0094] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0095] S121: freeze multiple evaluation data;

[0096] S122: Define the space where the internal system is located based on the traversal of the enterprise;

[0097] S123: defining the internal system according to the traversal of the space in which the internal system is located;

[0098] S124: Matching multiple evaluation data and internal systems, and defining corresponding matching coefficients;

[0099] S125: triggering dynamic adjustment of multiple evaluation data and internal systems according to the comparison result of the matching coefficient and the preset matching coefficient threshold;

[0100] S126: Match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the company's internal system.

[0101] In an embodiment of the present application, multiple evaluation data are frozen and overall management and control is performed on the multiple evaluation data. At the same time, the space where the internal system is located is defined based on the traversal of the enterprise, the space where the internal system is located is introduced, and the internal system is defined based on the traversal of the space where the internal system is located, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the internal system.

[0102] Therefore, multiple evaluation data and internal systems are matched, and the corresponding matching coefficients are defined. The matching coefficients are introduced and managed. At the same time, dynamic adjustments of multiple evaluation data and internal systems are triggered based on the comparison results of the matching coefficients and the preset matching coefficient thresholds. The corresponding innovation system is matched according to multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise, which is compatible with the overall considerations of multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise, and realizes precise control of the innovation system.

[0103] refer to Figure 4 , in step S13, matching the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise;

[0104] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0105] S131: freeze frame innovation system;

[0106] S132: Divide into multiple innovation categories based on the detection of the innovation system;

[0107] S133: Associate multiple innovation categories, the age of the enterprise, and the type of enterprise;

[0108] S134: defining a first model coefficient according to a plurality of innovation categories and the age of the enterprise, and defining a second model coefficient according to a plurality of innovation categories and the type of the enterprise;

[0109] S135: Define a corresponding self-test model based on the first model coefficient, the second model coefficient, and the model type matched by the innovation system.

[0110] In an embodiment of the present application, a fixed innovation system is introduced, thereby dividing multiple innovation categories based on the detection of the innovation system, introducing multiple innovation categories, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise, and associating multiple innovation categories, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise.

[0111] Therefore, the first model coefficient is defined according to multiple innovation categories and the years of the enterprise, and the second model coefficient is defined according to multiple innovation categories and the types of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test model is defined based on the first model coefficient, the second model coefficient and the model type matched by the innovation system, and the first model coefficient, the second model coefficient and the model type matched by the innovation system are introduced. The first model coefficient, the second model coefficient and the model type matched by the innovation system are considered as a whole, so as to achieve precise control of the self-test model.

[0112] refer to Figure 5 ,S14: Define the corresponding self-test level based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0113] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0114] S141: Fixed-frame self-test model;

[0115] S142: Linked innovation system and corresponding self-test model;

[0116] S143: Dynamically interact with the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0117] S144: Define corresponding self-assessment levels according to the dynamic interaction between the innovation system and the corresponding self-assessment model.

[0118] In an embodiment of the present application, multiple evaluation data of an enterprise are collected; a corresponding innovation system is matched based on the multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; a corresponding self-test model is matched according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; a corresponding self-test level is defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, realizes multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, and ensures the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0119] At this point, the self-test model is frozen and introduced to control the self-test model. At the same time, the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model are introduced and linked to achieve multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model.

[0120] Therefore, the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model are dynamically interacted; the corresponding self-test level is defined according to the dynamic interaction between the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, thereby realizing the dynamic interaction between the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model and ensuring the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0121] refer to Figure 6 , S15: Match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight;

[0122] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0123] S151: The innovation system of fixed-frame enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions;

[0124] S152: The innovation system of related enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions;

[0125] S153: Dynamically interact with the enterprise's innovation system and the corresponding evaluation agency;

[0126] S154: Determine the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization;

[0127] S155: Data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise based on the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization;

[0128] S156: Associating multiple data combinations, evaluation logics, and evaluation weights; defining evaluation levels according to the multiple data combinations, evaluation logics, and evaluation weights.

[0129] In an embodiment of the present application, the innovation system of an enterprise and its corresponding evaluation agency are fixed, the innovation system of the enterprise and its corresponding evaluation agency are introduced, and the innovation system of the enterprise and its corresponding evaluation agency are associated, thereby linking the innovation system of the enterprise and its corresponding evaluation agency, thereby achieving precise control over the innovation system of the enterprise and its corresponding evaluation agency.

[0130] Therefore, the enterprise's innovation system and the corresponding evaluation agency are dynamically interacted; the evaluation categories corresponding to the evaluation agency are fixed; the data combination of the enterprise's innovation system is matched with the evaluation categories corresponding to the evaluation agency, and the evaluation categories corresponding to the evaluation agency are introduced to ensure the accuracy of the data combination of the enterprise's innovation system.

[0131] Furthermore, multiple data combinations, evaluation logics and evaluation weights are associated; evaluation levels are defined based on multiple data combinations, evaluation logics and evaluation weights, multiple data combinations, evaluation logics and evaluation weights are introduced, and multiple data combinations, evaluation logics and evaluation weights are controlled in multiple dimensions, realizing multiple interactions of multiple data combinations, evaluation logics and evaluation weights, thereby ensuring the accuracy of evaluation levels.

[0132] refer to Figure 7 ,S16: Evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system;

[0133] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the specific steps may be:

[0134] S161: Fixed-frame self-test level;

[0135] S162: Collect self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system;

[0136] S163: Correlate self-assessment level, assessment level and innovation system;

[0137] S164: Dynamically interact with self-assessment levels, evaluation levels, and innovation systems;

[0138] S165: Define the first maturity parameter based on the self-assessment level and the assessment level, and define the second maturity parameter based on the self-assessment level and the innovation system;

[0139] S166: Evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system.

[0140] In the specific implementation process of the present invention, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-test level, evaluation level and innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-test level, evaluation level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-test level, evaluation level and innovation system, and ensures the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0141] At this time, the self-assessment level is fixed and introduced. At the same time, the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system are collected, the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system are managed and controlled, and the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system are linked.

[0142] Therefore, the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system are dynamically interacted; the first maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the evaluation level, and the second maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the innovation system; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated according to the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional control of the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system, and ensures the accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0143] For financial enterprises, self-testing teams are formed within the financial enterprises. The self-testing teams make full use of multiple evaluation data and manage multiple evaluation data, thereby introducing an innovation system by matching the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise.

[0144] The innovation system is controlled in multiple dimensions along multiple fields, which is compatible with the overall consideration of self-assessment level, assessment level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of self-assessment level, assessment level and innovation system, and ensures the assessment accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0145] The application innovation capability assessment divides the application innovation capabilities of financial institutions into five levels: initial level, working level, planning level, innovation level and demonstration level.

[0146]

[0147]

[0148] This assessment involves the following competency areas and competency items.

[0149]

[0150]

[0151] In an embodiment of the present invention, through the method in the embodiment of the present invention, multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are collected; the corresponding innovation system is matched based on the multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test model is matched according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; the corresponding self-test level is defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, realizes the multi-dimensional control of the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model, and ensures the accuracy of the self-test level.

[0152] Furthermore, the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; the maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, which is compatible with the overall consideration of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, realizes the multi-dimensional evaluation of the self-assessment level, evaluation level and innovation system, and ensures the evaluation accuracy of the maturity of the innovation system.

[0153] See also Figure 8 , Figure 8 It is a schematic diagram of the structural composition of the maturity assessment system of the enterprise's innovation system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0154] like Figure 8 As shown, a maturity evaluation system for an enterprise's innovation system, the maturity evaluation system for an enterprise's innovation system comprises:

[0155] A collection module 21 is used to collect multiple evaluation data of the enterprise;

[0156] System module 22, used to match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise;

[0157] The self-test module 23 is used to match the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise;

[0158] A level module 24, used to define corresponding self-test levels based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model;

[0159] Evaluation module 25, used to match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight;

[0160] The maturity module 26 is used to evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the assessment level and the innovation system.

[0161] See also Fig. 9 , refer to the following Fig. 9 The electronic device 40 according to this embodiment of the present invention will be described. Fig. 9 The electronic device 40 shown is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0162] like Fig. 9 As shown, the electronic device 40 is in the form of a general computing device. The components of the electronic device 40 may include but are not limited to: at least one processing unit 41, at least one storage unit 42, and a bus 43 connecting different system components (including the storage unit 42 and the processing unit 41).

[0163] The storage unit stores program codes, which can be executed by the processing unit 41, so that the processing unit 41 executes the steps according to various exemplary embodiments of the present invention described in the above “Embodiment Method” section of this specification.

[0164] The storage unit 42 may include a readable medium in the form of a volatile storage unit, such as a random access memory unit (RAM) 421 and / or a cache memory unit 422 , and may further include a read-only memory unit (ROM) 423 .

[0165] The storage unit 42 may also include a program / utility 424 having a set (at least one) of program modules 425, such program modules 425 including but not limited to: an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, each of which or some combination may include an implementation of a network environment.

[0166] Bus 43 may represent one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory unit bus or memory unit controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, a processing unit, or a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.

[0167] The electronic device 40 may also communicate with one or more external devices (e.g., keyboards, pointing devices, Bluetooth devices, etc.), one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 40, and / or any device that enables the electronic device 40 to communicate with one or more other computing devices (e.g., routers, modems, etc.). Such communication may be performed via an input / output (I / O) interface 44. Furthermore, the electronic device 40 may also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and / or a public network, such as the Internet) via a network adapter 45. Fig. 9 As shown, the network adapter 45 communicates with other modules of the electronic device 40 via the bus 43. It should be understood that although Fig. 9Not shown, other hardware and / or software modules may be used in conjunction with the electronic device 40, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup planning systems.

[0168] Through the description of the above implementation, it is easy for those skilled in the art to understand that the example implementation described here can be implemented by software, or by software combined with necessary hardware. Therefore, the technical solution according to the implementation of the present disclosure can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (which can be a CD-ROM, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, etc.) or on a network, including several instructions to enable a computing device (which can be a personal computer, a server, a terminal device, or a network device, etc.) to execute the method according to the implementation of the present disclosure.

[0169] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing related hardware through a program, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and the storage medium can include: a read-only memory (ROM, Read Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a disk or an optical disk, etc. In addition, it stores computer program instructions, and when the computer program instructions are executed by a computer, the computer executes the above method.

[0170] In addition, the above describes in detail the maturity assessment method and system of the innovation system of an enterprise provided by the embodiments of the present invention. Specific examples are used herein to illustrate the principles and implementation methods of the present invention. The description of the above embodiments is only used to help understand the method of the present invention and its core idea. At the same time, for those skilled in the art, according to the ideas of the present invention, there will be changes in the specific implementation methods and application scopes. In summary, the content of this specification should not be understood as limiting the present invention.

Claims

1. A maturity assessment method for an enterprise's innovation system, characterized in that: A maturity assessment scenario applied to the innovation system of an enterprise; The maturity assessment method of the enterprise's innovation system includes: Collect multiple evaluation data of enterprises; Match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the company's internal system; Match the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, age of the enterprise and the type of enterprise; Define the corresponding self-assessment level based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-assessment model; Match the data combination of the corresponding enterprise's innovation system according to the evaluation category of the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight; Assess the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system.

2. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The multiple evaluation data of the collected enterprise include: Collect the space where the enterprise is located; Match the corresponding computer IP based on the space where the enterprise is located; Transmit the corresponding evaluation table for each computer IP; Collect corresponding data sets based on online evaluation of each evaluation form; Associating the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field score; Multiple evaluation data of the enterprise are constructed based on the data set, the evaluation field corresponding to the enterprise, and the corresponding field scores.

3. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the matching of the enterprise's internal system includes: Freeze multiple evaluation data; Define the space where the internal system is located based on the enterprise's traversal; The internal system is defined according to the traversal of the space in which it resides; Match multiple evaluation data and internal systems, and define corresponding matching coefficients; Triggering dynamic adjustments of multiple evaluation data and internal systems based on the comparison results of the matching coefficient and the preset matching coefficient threshold; Match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the company's internal system.

4. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 3, characterized in that: The self-test model is matched according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise, including: freeze frame innovation system; Divide into multiple innovation categories based on the detection of the innovation system; Associate multiple innovation categories, the age of the enterprise, and the type of enterprise; A first model coefficient is defined according to a plurality of innovation categories and the age of the enterprise, and a second model coefficient is defined according to a plurality of innovation categories and the type of the enterprise; A corresponding self-test model is defined based on the first model coefficient, the second model coefficient and the model type matched by the innovation system.

5. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 4, characterized in that: The self-testing levels defined based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-testing model include: Fixed-frame self-assessment model; Linking innovation systems and corresponding self-test models; Dynamically interact with the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model; The corresponding self-assessment level is defined according to the dynamic interaction between the innovation system and the corresponding self-assessment model.

6. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation institution, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight, including: Define the innovation system of enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions; The innovation system of related enterprises and the corresponding evaluation institutions; Dynamically interact with the enterprise's innovation system and the corresponding evaluation agency.

7. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 6, characterized in that: The data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation institution, and the evaluation level is defined according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight, and also includes: Define the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization; The data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise is matched based on the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization; Associate multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights; define evaluation levels based on multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weights.

8. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The maturity of the innovation system is evaluated based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system, including: Fixed self-assessment level; Collect self-assessment levels, evaluation levels and innovation systems; Linking self-assessment levels, assessment levels, and innovation systems; Dynamically interact with self-assessment levels, evaluation levels and innovation system.

9. The method for evaluating the maturity of an enterprise's innovation system according to claim 8, characterized in that: The maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the evaluation level and the innovation system evaluation also includes: The first maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the assessment level, and the second maturity parameter is defined based on the self-assessment level and the innovation system; The maturity of the innovation system is assessed based on the first maturity parameter, the second maturity parameter and the innovation system.

10. A maturity assessment system for an enterprise's innovation system, characterized in that: The maturity evaluation system of the enterprise's innovation system is applied to the maturity evaluation method of the enterprise's innovation system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, and the maturity evaluation system of the enterprise's innovation system comprises: The collection module is used to collect multiple evaluation data of the enterprise; System module, which is used to match the corresponding innovation system based on multiple evaluation data and the internal system of the enterprise; The self-test module is used to match the corresponding self-test model according to the innovation system, the age of the enterprise and the type of the enterprise; The level module is used to define the corresponding self-test level based on the innovation system and the corresponding self-test model; The evaluation module is used to match the data combination of the innovation system of the corresponding enterprise according to the evaluation category corresponding to the evaluation organization, and define the evaluation level according to multiple data combinations, evaluation logic and evaluation weight; The maturity module is used to evaluate the maturity of the innovation system based on the self-assessment level, the assessment level and the innovation system.

Images