Cigarette product-based cigarette auxiliary material quality adaptability evaluation method

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of tobacco auxiliary material evaluation, in particular to a tobacco auxiliary material quality adaptability evaluation method based on cigarette products, which comprises the following steps: carrying out balance operation treatment on tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, screening out the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated with consistent appearance from the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after balance operation, and determining the quality adaptability of the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated. The cigarette auxiliary material samples to be evaluated are sequentially replaced to cigarette production equipment for use, quality inspection sampling is carried out on cigarette products produced after the cigarette auxiliary material samples to be evaluated are replaced to the cigarette production equipment, cigarette product detection indexes and score deduction standards serve as references, obtained cigarette sampling inspection samples are scored, and the cigarette auxiliary material samples to be evaluated are obtained. And on the basis of the score result of the cigarette casual inspection sample, evaluating the quality of a cigarette product produced by the to-be-evaluated cigarette auxiliary material, and indirectly reflecting the on-machine adaptability condition of the to-be-evaluated cigarette auxiliary material.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of tobacco auxiliary materials for cigarette products, and in particular to a method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products. Background Art

[0002] In the process of cigarette production, there are many kinds of auxiliary materials used in cigarette products, and there are certain differences between different suppliers and different batches. Therefore, auxiliary materials and cigarette products are prone to incompatibility during use. Among them, cigarette quality is the foundation of the product, and the adaptability between auxiliary materials and cigarette products is particularly important. Therefore, the quality adaptability of cigarette auxiliary materials is an important basis for measuring their adaptability on the machine.

[0003] Existing technologies such as Patent CN202111049049.2 discloses a method for evaluating the adaptability of tobacco materials on machines and Patent CN202310101753.0 discloses a method for evaluating the adaptability of cigarette packaging auxiliary materials on machines. Although the above method for evaluating the adaptability of tobacco materials on machines and the above method for evaluating the adaptability of cigarette packaging auxiliary materials on machines can complete the evaluation of the adaptability between tobacco auxiliary materials and machines, these two methods have the following defects: there are many evaluation dimensions (there are many evaluation dimensions: including product quality, equipment efficiency, material consumption, equipment adjustment time, abnormal performance, etc.), the evaluation dimensions are not highlighted, the weights of each dimension are affected by human factors, the evaluation results are not objective, and the equipment factors are not excluded, which leads to the inclusion of the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself into the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results.

[0004] Therefore, it is necessary to design a method for evaluating the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine in order to solve the problem that in the existing evaluation of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine, there are many evaluation dimensions, the focus of the evaluation dimensions is not prominent, the weight of each dimension is affected by human factors, the evaluation results are not objective, the factors of the equipment are not excluded, and the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself are also included in the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to propose a method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco excipients based on cigarette products, so as to solve the problem that in the existing evaluation of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine, there are many evaluation dimensions, the focus of the evaluation dimensions is not prominent, the weight of each dimension is affected by human factors, the evaluation result is not objective, the factors of the equipment are not excluded, and the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself are also included in the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine.

[0006] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention adopts the following technical solution: a method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products, comprising the following steps:

[0007] Step 1, performing a balanced operation process on the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, and selecting tobacco auxiliary materials with consistent appearance from the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after the balanced operation, to obtain tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated;

[0008] Step 2, replace the samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in turn on the cigarette production equipment for use, and conduct quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each sample of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment to obtain random inspection cigarette samples;

[0009] Step 3. Based on the quality inspection standards of the country, industry or enterprise products, and in combination with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, and determine the inspection indicators and deduction standards of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the excipients to be evaluated;

[0010] Step 4. With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3, score the cigarette samples obtained in Step 2, and based on the scoring results of the cigarette samples, evaluate the quality of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, which indirectly reflects the adaptability of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated on the machine.

[0011] Preferably, the Step 1, performing a balancing operation on the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, screening tobacco auxiliary materials with consistent appearance from the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after the balancing operation, and obtaining tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated, comprises the following steps:

[0012] Step 1.1, purchasing different batches of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated from different manufacturers, placing the purchased different batches of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in a production environment for equilibrium for more than 48 hours, and obtaining samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after equilibrium treatment;

[0013] Step 1.2, from the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated after the balancing treatment, the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated with the same appearance are screened to obtain the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated;

[0014] Step 1.3, in view of the requirement of continuous production of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated for 2 hours, the amount of tobacco excipients to be evaluated that can meet the requirement of continuous production for 2 hours is collected from the screened tobacco excipients samples to be evaluated, and the tobacco excipients samples to be evaluated that can meet the requirement of continuous production for 2 hours are obtained.

[0015] Preferably, the Step 2, replacing the samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in turn on the cigarette production equipment for use, and performing quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each sample of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment to obtain cigarette random inspection samples, comprises the following steps:

[0016] Step 2.1, based on the samples of tobacco accessories to be evaluated from different batches and different manufacturers, the samples of tobacco accessories to be evaluated that meet the requirements of continuous production for 2 hours are classified and processed to obtain tobacco accessories A to be evaluated, tobacco accessories B to be evaluated, tobacco accessories C to be evaluated, and tobacco accessories D to be evaluated;

[0017] Step 2.2, based on the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, select sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient A to be evaluated, sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient B to be evaluated, sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient C to be evaluated, and sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient D to be evaluated;

[0018] Step 2.3. According to the requirements of GB / T 5606.1, determine the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated, and the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated;

[0019] Step 2.4, when the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, replace the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated onto the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, sample the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated once per minute, and repeat the sampling process until the number of sampling times for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample A is obtained;

[0020] Step 2.5, when the number of samplings of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated are sampled once per minute, and the sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample B is obtained;

[0021] Step 2.6, when the number of samplings of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated are sampled once per minute, and the sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample C is obtained;

[0022] Step 2.7. When the number of samplings of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, replace the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated onto the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, sample the cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample D is obtained.

[0023] Preferably, except for the tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, B to be evaluated, C to be evaluated and D to be evaluated, the other excipients used in the production of cigarette products should be products of the same manufacturer and the same batch, and the operator who replaces the tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, B to be evaluated, C to be evaluated and D to be evaluated to the cigarette production equipment in sequence and the sampler who takes samples of the cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, B to be evaluated, C to be evaluated and D to be evaluated are also the same person.

[0024] Preferably, the cigarette production equipment used for the tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, the tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, the tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and the tobacco excipients D to be evaluated are all the same, and in the process of producing cigarette products using the tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, the tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, the tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and the tobacco excipients D to be evaluated, except for the cigarette production equipment, other production equipment should also be the same.

[0025] Preferably, the Step 3, based on the quality inspection standards of the country, industry or enterprise products, combined with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, and determine the inspection indicators and deduction standards of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the excipients to be evaluated, including the following steps:

[0026] Step 3.1. Based on the quality inspection standards of the tobacco industry, the national quality inspection standards for the tobacco industry or the quality inspection standards of China Tobacco Industry, and in combination with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, select the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated;

[0027] Step 3.2. Based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, determine the testing indicators and deduction standards for the cigarette products produced from the tobacco excipient samples to be evaluated.

[0028] Preferably, the Step 4, referring to the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3, scores the cigarette quality inspection samples obtained in Step 2, and based on the scoring results of the cigarette quality inspection samples, evaluates the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, which indirectly reflects the adaptability of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, including the following steps:

[0029] Step 4.1. Using the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3 as a reference, score each sampled cigarette sample A obtained in Step 2.4 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample A and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample A;

[0030] Step 4.2, with reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3, score each sampled cigarette sample B obtained in Step 2.5 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample B and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample B;

[0031] Step 4.3, using the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3 as a reference, score each sample C obtained in Step 2.6, and add up the scores of the sample C and take the average to obtain the final score of the sample C;

[0032] Step 4.4, with reference to the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3, score each sampled cigarette sample D obtained in Step 2.7 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample D and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample D;

[0033] Step 4.5. Sort the final scores of cigarette sample A sampled in Step 4.1, the final scores of cigarette sample B sampled in Step 4.2, the final scores of cigarette sample C sampled in Step 4.3, and the final scores of cigarette sample D sampled in Step 4.4 from high to low. Cigarette products produced with tobacco excipients to be evaluated with high scores have better quality, and the tobacco excipients to be evaluated have better adaptability to the machine.

[0034] Preferably, in Step 4.5, the final scores of the sampled cigarette A in Step 4.1, the final scores of the sampled cigarette B in Step 4.2, the final scores of the sampled cigarette C in Step 4.3, and the final scores of the sampled cigarette D in Step 4.4 are sorted from high to low. The cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated with high scores have better quality, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated on the machine is also better, specifically in the following situations;

[0035] If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample A corresponding to the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated on the machine is good;

[0036] If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample B corresponding to the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated on the machine is good;

[0037] If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample C corresponding to the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated on the machine is good;

[0038] If the final score of the randomly inspected cigarette sample D corresponding to the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette product produced by the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated is better, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated on the machine is better.

[0039] Preferably, the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated may be any one of tip glue, tipping paper and filter, or may be other tobacco auxiliary materials involved in the production process of cigarette products.

[0040] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least one of the following beneficial effects:

[0041] When evaluating the adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials to the machine, the present invention fixes factors such as operating personnel, production equipment and other auxiliary materials, takes the evaluated auxiliary materials as the only variable, takes the cigarette product quality inspection standards as the basis, and clarifies the deduction standards for the auxiliary materials to be evaluated during the machine application process, and highly focuses on the evaluation dimensions, which not only excludes interference factors and focuses on the quality dimension, but also makes the evaluation results highly targeted, thereby solving the problem that in the existing evaluation of the adaptability between tobacco auxiliary materials and the machine, there are many evaluation dimensions, the key points of the evaluation dimensions are not prominent, the weights of each dimension are affected by human factors, the objectivity of the evaluation results is not strong, the factors of the equipment are not excluded, and the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself are also included in the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results of the adaptability between tobacco auxiliary materials and the machine. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] Figure 1 It is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products in the structure of the present invention;

[0043] Table 1 is a summary of the number of randomly inspected cigarette samples produced with each tobacco excipient to be evaluated.

[0044] Table 2 is a table of quality inspection standards for auxiliary material samples in the present invention.

[0045] Table 3 is a summary table of the quality inspection scores of the auxiliary material samples to be evaluated in the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] like Figure 1 In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention.

[0047] Example

[0048] Existing technologies such as Patent CN202111049049.2 discloses a method for evaluating the adaptability of tobacco materials to machines, and Patent CN202310101753.0 discloses a method for evaluating the adaptability of cigarette packaging auxiliary materials to machines, but these two methods have the following defects: there are many evaluation dimensions (there are many evaluation dimensions: including product quality, equipment efficiency, material consumption, equipment adjustment time, abnormal performance, etc.), the evaluation dimensions are not highlighted, the weights of each dimension are affected by human factors, the evaluation results are not objective, and the equipment factors are not excluded, which leads to the inclusion of the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself into the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results.

[0049] Therefore, the present application proposes a method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco excipients based on cigarette products to solve the problem that in the existing evaluation of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine, there are many evaluation dimensions, the focus of the evaluation dimensions is not prominent, the weight of each dimension is affected by human factors, the evaluation result is not objective, the factors of the equipment are not excluded, and the inadaptability problems caused by the equipment itself are also included in the evaluation model, resulting in large errors in the evaluation results of the adaptability between tobacco excipients and the machine.

[0050] Among them, the tobacco auxiliary materials mentioned above can be any one of the mouthpiece glue, tipping paper and filter, or other tobacco auxiliary materials involved in the production process of cigarette products. This application uses the tobacco auxiliary material as the mouthpiece glue, and specifically evaluates the quality adaptability of the mouthpiece glue of four manufacturers on the machine. Please refer to Figure 1 A method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products comprises the following steps:

[0051] In the first step, the nozzle glue to be evaluated is subjected to a balancing operation. From the nozzle glue to be evaluated after the balancing operation, the nozzle glue to be evaluated with the same appearance is selected to obtain the nozzle glue samples to be evaluated, as follows:

[0052] S1.1. Purchase different batches of nozzle glue to be evaluated from four manufacturers, place the four different batches of nozzle glue to be evaluated in the production environment for equilibrium for more than 48 hours, and obtain the nozzle glue samples after equilibrium treatment; Among them, the different batches of nozzle glue to be evaluated purchased are placed in the production environment for equilibrium for more than 48 hours, so as to find out the nozzle glue to be evaluated that is not suitable for the production environment, and ensure the stability of the nozzle glue to be evaluated after being put into use.

[0053] S1.2. From the samples of mouthpiece glue to be evaluated after balancing treatment, those with inconsistent or large differences in appearance are eliminated, and the samples of mouthpiece glue to be evaluated with consistent appearance are screened out to obtain the screened samples of mouthpiece glue to be evaluated; wherein, the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated with inconsistent or large differences in appearance are eliminated, and the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated with consistent appearance are screened out to ensure the consistency in appearance of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated produced by different batches or different manufacturers, so as to reduce the error in the subsequent evaluation of the quality adaptability of the mouthpiece glue.

[0054] S1.3. In response to the requirement of continuous production of the nozzle glue to be evaluated for 2 hours, the amount of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated that can meet the continuous production for 2 hours is collected from the screened nozzle glue samples to be evaluated, so as to obtain the nozzle glue samples to be evaluated that can meet the continuous production for 2 hours; wherein, the requirement of continuous production of the nozzle glue to be evaluated for 2 hours and the amount of nozzle glue to be evaluated that can meet the continuous production for 2 hours are collected from the nozzle glue to be evaluated, so as to ensure that the nozzle glue samples to be evaluated can be installed in the cigarette equipment and can produce stably for 2 hours, so as to ensure that the subsequent sampling process of cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue samples to be evaluated can proceed normally.

[0055] In this embodiment, the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated is subjected to a balancing operation process, and mouthpiece glue samples to be evaluated with consistent appearance are screened out from the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated after the balancing operation, so as to prepare for the mouthpiece glue samples to be evaluated to be loaded onto the machine.

[0056] The second step is to replace the sample of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated with the cigarette production equipment in turn, and conduct quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each sample of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated is replaced with the cigarette production equipment to obtain the random inspection cigarette samples, as follows:

[0057] S2.1. Based on the mouthpiece glues to be evaluated from different batches and four manufacturers, the samples of mouthpiece glue to be evaluated that meet the requirements of continuous production for 2 hours are classified and processed to obtain mouthpiece glue A to be evaluated, mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated; among them, the mouthpiece glue samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated based on different batches and four manufacturers, that is, according to the four manufacturers producing the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated is divided into four categories, and on the basis of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated divided into four categories, the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated is classified for the second time according to the batches of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated, so as to divide the mouthpiece glue samples to be evaluated into mouthpiece glue A to be evaluated, mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated.

[0058] S2.2. Based on the characteristics of the nozzle glue to be evaluated, select sampling points in the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue A to be evaluated, the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue B to be evaluated, the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue C to be evaluated, and the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue D to be evaluated; wherein, the sampling points in the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue A to be evaluated, the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue B to be evaluated, the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue C to be evaluated, and the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue D to be evaluated may be taken before the cigarettes are rolled and packaged, so as to ensure the consistency of the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue A to be evaluated, the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue B to be evaluated, the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue C to be evaluated, and the cigarette products produced by nozzle glue D to be evaluated; wherein, the characteristics of the nozzle glue to be evaluated may refer to the characteristics of the nozzle glue assisting the cigarettes to bond well and be in a stable state, for example, before the cigarettes are rolled and packaged, the nozzle glue bonding is in a stable state.

[0059] S2.3. According to the requirements of GB / T 5606.1, determine the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue A, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C, and the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue D; among which, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue A, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B, and the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue The number of samplings for quality inspection, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C, and the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue D are 30 times, and the number of cigarettes sampled each time shall not be less than 230 cigarettes (200 of the 230 cigarettes are used for appearance inspection, and 30 are used for physical index inspection) to ensure the consistency of the number of samplings for cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue A, cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B, cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C, and cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue D.

[0060] S2.4. When the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the nozzle glue A to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated are sampled once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of sampling points for quality inspection of the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated is met for 30 times, and the random inspection cigarette samples A are obtained. The random inspection cigarette samples A are numbered A-1 to A-30, as shown in Table 1; wherein, after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated are sampled once per minute. Sampling is carried out once in order to sample the cigarette products after the cigarette production equipment has stabilized in production, so as to avoid the situation that some defective products are taken out when the cigarette production equipment is not stable, which affects the quality adaptability evaluation of subsequent tobacco accessories, thereby reducing the error in the quality adaptability evaluation of the nozzle glue to be evaluated; the sampling process is repeated until the number of sampling times for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated is met. 30 times is for sampling more cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated, so that the random inspection cigarette sample A taken from the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue A to be evaluated is more representative.

[0061] S2.5. When the number of samplings of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue A meets the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue A, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the evaluated nozzle glue B is replaced on the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B are sampled once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B is met 30 times, and the sampled cigarette samples B are obtained. The sampled cigarette samples B are numbered B-1 to B-30, as shown in Table 1; After the production is stable, the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue B are sampled once every minute. This is to sample the cigarette products after the cigarette production equipment has stabilized production, so as to avoid the situation where some defective products are taken out when the cigarette production equipment is not stable, which affects the subsequent quality adaptability evaluation of the evaluation nozzle glue, thereby reducing the error of the quality adaptability evaluation of the evaluation nozzle glue; the sampling process is repeated until the number of sampling times for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue A is met. 30 times, in order to sample more cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue B, so that the random inspection cigarette sample B taken from the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue B is more representative.

[0062] S2.6. When the number of samplings of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B meets the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue B, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the evaluated nozzle glue C is replaced on the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C are sampled once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C is met 30 times, and the sampled cigarette samples C are obtained. The sampled cigarette samples C are numbered C-1 to C-30, as shown in Table 1; After the production of the equipment becomes stable, the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue C to be evaluated are sampled once per minute. This is to sample the cigarette products after the cigarette production equipment has stabilized production, so as to avoid the situation where some defective products are taken out when the production of the cigarette production equipment is not stable, which affects the subsequent quality adaptability evaluation of tobacco accessories, thereby reducing the error in the quality adaptability evaluation of the nozzle glue to be evaluated. The sampling process is repeated until the number of sampling times for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue C to be evaluated is met, which is 30 times. This is to sample more cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue C to be evaluated, so that the random inspection cigarette sample C taken from the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue C to be evaluated is more representative.

[0063] S2.7. When the number of samplings of cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C meets the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue C, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the evaluated nozzle glue D is replaced on the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue D are sampled once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings required for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the evaluated nozzle glue D is met 30 times, and the sampled cigarette samples D are obtained. The sampled cigarette samples D are numbered D-1 to D-30, as shown in Table 1. Among them, after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue D are sampled once per minute. This is to sample the cigarette products after the cigarette production equipment is stable, so as to avoid the situation where some defective products are taken out when the production of the cigarette production equipment is not stable, which affects the subsequent quality adaptability evaluation of tobacco accessories, thereby reducing the error of the quality adaptability evaluation of the evaluation nozzle glue; the sampling process is repeated until the number of sampling points for quality inspection of the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue D is met, so as to sample more cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue D, so that the random inspection cigarette sample D taken from the cigarette products produced by the evaluation nozzle glue B is more representative.

[0064] Table 1 Summary of the number of sampled cigarettes produced from tobacco excipients to be evaluated

[0065]

[0066] Except for the evaluated tip glue D, other auxiliary materials used in the production of cigarette products (auxiliary materials: tipping paper, filter rods and cigarette paper) should be products of the same manufacturer and the same batch, and the operator who replaces the tip glue A to be evaluated, the tip glue B to be evaluated, the tip glue C to be evaluated and the tip glue D to be evaluated in sequence to the cigarette production equipment and the sampling personnel who takes samples of the cigarette products produced by the tip glue A to be evaluated, the tip glue B to be evaluated, the tip glue C to be evaluated and the tip glue D to be evaluated are also the same person; in addition, the tip glue A to be evaluated, the tip glue C to be evaluated and the tip glue D to be evaluated are the same person; The cigarette production equipment used for nozzle glue B, nozzle glue C to be evaluated and nozzle glue D to be evaluated are the same, and in the process of producing cigarette products with nozzle glue A to be evaluated, nozzle glue B to be evaluated, nozzle glue C to be evaluated and nozzle glue D to be evaluated, except for the cigarette production equipment, other production equipment should also be the same, so as to eliminate interference from other tobacco auxiliary materials, production equipment and operators, and thereby reduce the error of quality adaptability evaluation of nozzle glue A to be evaluated, nozzle glue B to be evaluated, nozzle glue C to be evaluated and nozzle glue D to be evaluated.

[0067] In this embodiment, by replacing the samples of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated (the mouthpiece glue samples: the mouthpiece glue A to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and the mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated) in sequence to the cigarette production equipment for use, and performing quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each mouthpiece glue sample to be evaluated (the mouthpiece glue samples: the mouthpiece glue A to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and the mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated) is replaced with the cigarette production equipment, the cigarette products can be provided with more representative random inspection cigarette samples A, random inspection cigarette samples B, random inspection cigarette samples C and random inspection cigarette samples D in the subsequent evaluation of the quality adaptability of the mouthpiece glue A to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and the mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated, so that the subsequent results of the quality adaptability evaluation of the mouthpiece glue B to be evaluated, the mouthpiece glue C to be evaluated and the mouthpiece glue D to be evaluated are more representative.

[0068] Step 3: Based on the quality inspection standards of the country, industry or enterprise products, combined with the characteristics of the nozzle glue to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the nozzle glue to be evaluated, and based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the auxiliary nozzle glue to be evaluated, determine the inspection indicators and deduction standards of the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue sample to be evaluated, as follows:

[0069] S3.1. Based on the quality inspection standards of the tobacco industry, the national quality inspection standards for the tobacco industry or the quality inspection standards of China Tobacco Industry, and in combination with the characteristics of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated; among them, based on the quality inspection standards of the tobacco industry, the national quality inspection standards for the tobacco industry or the quality inspection standards of China Tobacco Industry, this application uses the enterprise standard "Cigarette Product Quality Inspection Management Regulations" of Yunnan China Tobacco Industrial Co., Ltd. as the quality inspection basis, and in combination with the characteristics of the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the mouthpiece glue to be evaluated.

[0070] S3.2. Based on the deduction indexes and deduction standards that are strongly related to the nozzle glue to be evaluated, determine the test indexes and deduction standards for the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue sample to be evaluated; among which, the deduction indexes and deduction standards that are strongly related to the nozzle glue to be evaluated or the test indexes and deduction standards for the cigarette products produced by the nozzle glue sample to be evaluated are shown in Table 2

[0071] Table 2 Quality indicators and deduction standards

[0072]

[0073]

[0074] Step 4: With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Table 2, score the cigarette random inspection samples obtained in Table 1, and based on the scoring results of the cigarette random inspection samples, evaluate the quality of the cigarette products produced by the mouthpiece glue samples to be evaluated, which indirectly reflects the adaptability of the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, as follows:

[0075] S4.1. With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Table 2, the sampled cigarette samples numbered A-1 to A-30 obtained in Table 1 are scored in turn, and the scores obtained from the sampled cigarette samples numbered A-1 to A-30 are added together and averaged to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample A, as shown in Table 3;

[0076] S4.2. With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Table 2, the random inspection cigarette samples numbered B-1 to B-30 obtained in Table 1 are scored in turn, and the scores obtained from the random inspection cigarette samples numbered B-1 to B-30 are added together and averaged to obtain the final score of the random inspection cigarette sample B, as shown in Table 3;

[0077] S4.3. With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Table 2, the sampled cigarette samples numbered C-1 to C-30 obtained in Table 1 are scored in turn, and the scores obtained from the sampled cigarette samples numbered C-1 to C-30 are added together and averaged to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample C, as shown in Table 3;

[0078] S4.4. Using the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Table 2 as a reference, score the sampled cigarette samples numbered D-1 to D-30 obtained in Table 1 in turn, and add up the scores of the sampled cigarette samples numbered D-1 to D-30 and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample D, as shown in Table 3;

[0079] S4.5. Sort the final scores of the sampled cigarette sample B, the final scores of the sampled cigarette sample C, and the final scores of the sampled cigarette sample D from high to low. The cigarette samples produced by the nozzle glue to be evaluated with high scores have better quality and better adaptability of the nozzle glue to be evaluated on the machine, as shown in Table 3.

[0080] Table 3 Quality inspection score summary

[0081]

[0082] It can be seen from Table 3 that, under the same conditions of fixed operating personnel, production equipment and other auxiliary materials (other auxiliary materials: tipping paper, filter rods and cigarette paper), there are certain differences in the machine quality scores of the four types of tip glues. The machine adaptability is from good to bad in the order of tip glue B>tip glue A=tip glue C>tip glue D, indicating that the established evaluation method can effectively distinguish the quality adaptability of auxiliary materials.

[0083] When evaluating the quality adaptability of the tip glue, this application can fix factors such as operators, cigarette production equipment and other auxiliary materials (other auxiliary materials: tipping paper, filter and cigarette paper), with the tip glue as the only variable. It is based on the cigarette product quality inspection standards and clearly defines the deduction standards for the process of putting the auxiliary materials to be evaluated on the machine, and highly focuses on the evaluation dimensions. It not only eliminates interference factors and focuses on the quality dimension, but also makes the evaluation results highly targeted.

[0084] Although the present invention is described herein with reference to a number of illustrative embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art may devise many other modifications and implementations that fall within the scope and spirit of the principles disclosed herein. More specifically, within the scope of the present disclosure, drawings, and claims, a variety of variations and modifications may be made to the components and / or layout of the subject combination layout. In addition to the variations and modifications made to the components and / or layout, other uses will also be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step 1, performing a balanced operation process on the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, and selecting tobacco auxiliary materials with consistent appearance from the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after the balanced operation, to obtain tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated; Step 2, replace the samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in turn on the cigarette production equipment for use, and conduct quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each sample of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment to obtain random inspection cigarette samples; Step 3. Based on the quality inspection standards of the country, industry or enterprise products, and in combination with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, and determine the inspection indicators and deduction standards of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the excipients to be evaluated; Step 4. With reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3, score the cigarette samples obtained in Step 2, and based on the scoring results of the cigarette samples, evaluate the quality of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, which indirectly reflects the adaptability of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated on the machine.

2. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 1, performing a balancing operation on the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, screening out tobacco auxiliary materials with consistent appearance from the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after the balancing operation, and obtaining tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated, comprises the following steps: Step 1.1, purchasing different batches of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated from different manufacturers, placing the purchased different batches of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in a production environment for equilibrium for more than 48 hours, and obtaining samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after equilibrium treatment; Step 1.2, from the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated after the balancing treatment, the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated with the same appearance are screened to obtain the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated; Step 1.3, in view of the requirement of continuous production of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated for 2 hours, the amount of tobacco excipients to be evaluated that can meet the requirement of continuous production for 2 hours is collected from the screened tobacco excipients samples to be evaluated, and the tobacco excipient samples to be evaluated that meet the requirement of continuous production for 2 hours are obtained.

3. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step 2, replacing the samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated in turn on the cigarette production equipment for use, and performing quality inspection sampling on the cigarette products produced after each sample of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment to obtain cigarette random inspection samples, includes the following steps: Step 2.1, based on different batches and different manufacturers of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated, the samples of tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated after 2 hours of continuous production are classified and processed to obtain tobacco auxiliary materials A to be evaluated, tobacco auxiliary materials B to be evaluated, tobacco auxiliary materials C to be evaluated, and tobacco auxiliary materials D to be evaluated; Step 2.2, based on the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, select sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient A to be evaluated, sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient B to be evaluated, sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient C to be evaluated, and sampling points in the cigarette products produced with tobacco excipient D to be evaluated; Step 2.

3. According to the requirements of GB / T 5606.1, determine the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated, the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated, and the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated; Step 2.4, when the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, replace the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated onto the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, sample the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated once per minute, and repeat the sampling process until the number of sampling times for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample A is obtained; Step 2.5, when the number of samplings of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material A to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated are sampled once per minute, and the sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample B is obtained; Step 2.6, when the number of samplings of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material B to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated is replaced on the cigarette production equipment, and after the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated are sampled once per minute, and the sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material C to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample C is obtained; Step 2.

7. When the number of samplings of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated meets the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated in Step 2.3, and the cigarette production equipment is running at the rated speed, replace the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated onto the cigarette production equipment. After the production of the cigarette production equipment is stable, sample the cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated once per minute. This sampling process is repeated until the number of samplings for quality inspection from the sampling points of cigarette products produced with the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated in Step 2.3 is met, and the random inspection cigarette sample D is obtained.

4. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 3, characterized in that: Except for tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and tobacco excipients D to be evaluated, other excipients produced with cigarette products should be products of the same manufacturer and the same batch, and the operator who replaces tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and tobacco excipients D to be evaluated to the cigarette production equipment in sequence and the sampler who takes samples of cigarette products produced with tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and tobacco excipients D to be evaluated are also the same person.

5. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 3, characterized in that: The cigarette production equipment used for tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and tobacco excipients D to be evaluated are all the same, and in the process of producing cigarette products using tobacco excipients A to be evaluated, tobacco excipients B to be evaluated, tobacco excipients C to be evaluated and tobacco excipients D to be evaluated, except for the cigarette production equipment, other production equipment should also be the same.

6. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The Step 3, based on the quality inspection standards of the country, industry or enterprise products, combined with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, screen out the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, and based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the excipients to be evaluated, determine the inspection indicators and deduction standards of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, including the following steps: Step 3.

1. Based on the quality inspection standards of the tobacco industry, the national quality inspection standards for the tobacco industry or the quality inspection standards of China Tobacco Industry, and in combination with the characteristics of the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, select the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly related to the tobacco excipients to be evaluated; Step 3.

2. Based on the deduction indicators and deduction standards that are strongly correlated with the tobacco excipients to be evaluated, determine the testing indicators and deduction standards for cigarette products produced from the tobacco excipient samples to be evaluated.

7. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 1, characterized in that: The Step 4, referring to the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3, scores the cigarette quality inspection samples obtained in Step 2, and based on the scoring results of the cigarette quality inspection samples, evaluates the quality of cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary material samples to be evaluated, which indirectly reflects the adaptability of the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated to the machine, including the following steps: Step 4.

1. Using the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3 as a reference, score each sampled cigarette sample A obtained in Step 2.4 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample A and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample A; Step 4.2, with reference to the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3, score each sampled cigarette sample B obtained in Step 2.5 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample B and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample B; Step 4.3, using the cigarette product testing indicators and deduction standards determined in Step 3 as a reference, score each sample C obtained in Step 2.6, and add up the scores of the sample C and take the average to obtain the final score of the sample C; Step 4.4, with reference to the cigarette product testing index and deduction standard determined in Step 3, score each sampled cigarette sample D obtained in Step 2.7 in turn, and add up the scores of each sampled cigarette sample D and take the average value to obtain the final score of the sampled cigarette sample D; Step 4.

5. Sort the final scores of cigarette sample A sampled in Step 4.1, the final scores of cigarette sample B sampled in Step 4.2, the final scores of cigarette sample C sampled in Step 4.3, and the final scores of cigarette sample D sampled in Step 4.4 from high to low. Cigarette products produced with tobacco excipients to be evaluated with high scores have better quality, and the tobacco excipients to be evaluated have better adaptability to the machine.

8. The method for evaluating the quality adaptability of tobacco auxiliary materials based on cigarette products according to claim 7, characterized in that: In the Step 4.5, the final scores of the sampled cigarette A in Step 4.1, the final scores of the sampled cigarette B in Step 4.2, the final scores of the sampled cigarette C in Step 4.3, and the final scores of the sampled cigarette D in Step 4.4 are sorted from high to low. The cigarette products produced by the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated with high scores have better quality, and the adaptability of the tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated on the machine is also better. Specifically, there are the following situations; If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample A corresponding to the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient A to be evaluated on the machine is good; If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample B corresponding to the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient B to be evaluated on the machine is good; If the final score of the sampled cigarette sample C corresponding to the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette products produced by the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated is good, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient C to be evaluated on the machine is good; If the final score of the randomly inspected cigarette sample D corresponding to the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated is the highest, the quality of the cigarette product produced by the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated is better, and the adaptability of the tobacco excipient D to be evaluated on the machine is better.

9. The tobacco auxiliary materials to be evaluated as described in claims 1-8 can be any one of tip glue, tipping paper and filter, or can be other tobacco auxiliary materials involved in the production process of cigarette products.

Images