A method and device for evaluating the safety performance of all personnel in a steel enterprise
By constructing a safety performance evaluation model and system for steel enterprises, generating a job list and automatically acquiring performance information, the problems of low efficiency and low accuracy in existing technologies have been solved. This has enabled efficient, accurate, and practical safety performance evaluation for all employees, thereby improving the level of safety management.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- SINOSTEEL WUHAN SAFEY&ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION RES
- Filing Date
- 2024-12-05
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-29
AI Technical Summary
In the existing technology, the safety performance evaluation methods of steel enterprises are inefficient, inaccurate and impractical, and cannot meet the needs of safety performance evaluation for all employees, resulting in the evaluation becoming a mere formality and affecting the level of safety management.
Build a safety performance evaluation model and system, generate a safety performance checklist for each position, automatically obtain performance information through an information platform, analyze and output the results using the safety performance evaluation model, and introduce an automatic performance generation function to reduce the burden on employees.
This approach has enabled clear accountability for safety performance evaluations, covering all employees and improving accuracy and practicality. It has also enhanced the efficiency and applicability of safety performance evaluations, thereby ensuring an improvement in safety management.
Smart Images

Figure CN119940993B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of steel safety management, and particularly to a method and device for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise. Background Art
[0002] At present, in the process of the gradual improvement and upgrading of relevant laws and regulations, the safety accident liability investigation mechanism, and the safety production standardization construction of steel enterprises, the safety management level in the steel field has been improved to a certain extent. However, safety accidents still occur from time to time, and the safety situation remains severe. To fundamentally improve the safety management level of steel enterprises, it is necessary to clarify a strict safety production responsibility system, and assess the implementation of safety production responsibilities based on responsibility performance, so that relevant personnel do not dare to slack off and have any chance of taking risks.
[0003] Steel enterprises have all formulated corresponding assessment methods for the safety production responsibility system. However, in the process of building the full-staff safety production responsibility system, the existing duty performance evaluation methods still have problems such as low efficiency, low accuracy, and poor practicability in safety duty performance evaluation, and cannot reflect the systematicness, comprehensiveness, scientificity, and rationality that modern safety management should have, and cannot meet the needs of the full-staff safety duty performance evaluation of steel enterprises, resulting in the assessment becoming a mere formality and the safety management level being poor.
[0004] In view of this, overcoming the defects of the existing technology is an urgent problem to be solved in this technical field. Summary of the Invention
[0005] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method and device for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise. The purpose is to construct a safety duty performance evaluation model and a safety duty performance evaluation system. The safety duty performance evaluation system generates the safety production responsibility system and the list of post safety duty performance of all employees in the enterprise according to the organizational structure of the steel enterprise and the system safety responsibility database, and uses the safety duty performance evaluation model to analyze the actual duty performance corresponding to the list of post safety duty performance, automatically output the corresponding safety duty performance evaluation result and display it; by constructing a safety duty performance evaluation system, collect the actual duty performance as comprehensively as possible, and based on the safety duty performance evaluation model, standardize and unify the evaluation criteria, solving the problems of low efficiency, low accuracy, and poor practicability in safety duty performance evaluation in the existing technology.
[0006] The present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
[0007] In the first aspect, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, constructing a safety duty performance evaluation model; based on the safety duty performance evaluation model, constructing a safety duty performance evaluation system; the method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in the steel enterprise includes:
[0008] The organizational structure of the steel enterprise is imported into the system safety responsibility database for each position. After the data in the system safety responsibility database is personalized, a safety responsibility system for all employees and a list of safety duties for each position are generated based on the personalized system safety responsibility database.
[0009] According to the job safety performance checklist, employees upload performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connect with the company's existing information platform to obtain the corresponding actual performance status.
[0010] The actual performance of duties is analyzed using the safety performance evaluation model, and the job performance evaluation results are automatically output.
[0011] The results of the safety performance evaluation are displayed.
[0012] Furthermore, the actual performance of duties includes automatically generated performance information and proactively reported performance information;
[0013] According to the aforementioned job safety performance checklist, employees upload performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connect with the company's existing information platform, including:
[0014] The safety performance evaluation system connects to the company's existing information platform to automatically obtain the employee's performance information within a preset time range. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate and automatically fills it into the corresponding position in the safety performance evaluation system as the employee's automatically generated performance status.
[0015] The employee views the automatically generated performance status at the corresponding location and, based on the automatically generated performance status, determines whether there are any unreported items within a preset time range. When there are unreported items, the employee adds the corresponding proactive performance status to the computer or mini-program of the safety performance evaluation system based on the unreported items, so that the safety performance evaluation system can obtain the corresponding actual performance status.
[0016] Furthermore, the safety performance evaluation system automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time frame by connecting to the company's existing information platform. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate, including:
[0017] When the employee makes a phone call with any other employee, the employee's job performance information is generated according to the content format of the job safety performance checklist and the content of the phone call, and the employee's personal action certificate is generated based on the job performance information.
[0018] When an employee exchanges emails with any other employee, the employee involved in the email exchange is obtained based on the email address of the exchange; natural language processing is performed on the content of the email exchange to obtain content to be processed; according to the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the email exchange, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and a personal action certificate of the employee involved in the email exchange is generated based on the performance information.
[0019] When an employee communicates with any other employee through the company's dedicated chat tool, the employee involved in the communication will have their job performance information obtained based on the text messages, voice messages, and third-party platform calls within the application of the company's dedicated chat tool. In accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the communication, a personal action certificate of the employee involved in the communication will be generated based on the corresponding job performance information.
[0020] Adding the corresponding proactive reporting of performance status to the computer or mini-program version of the safety performance evaluation system includes:
[0021] The employees enter basic safety information through the company's existing safety information platform to obtain corresponding job performance information; according to the content format of the employees' job safety performance checklist, the job performance information of the employees involved in this entry is generated, including safety training information, operator qualification certificates, emergency drill information, safety inspection information or risk assessment information.
[0022] Furthermore, when the employee engages in a mobile phone dialing session with any other employee, according to the content format of the job security performance checklist, and based on the content of the mobile phone dialing session, the performance information of the employee involved in this mobile phone dialing session is generated, and the personal action certificate of the corresponding employee is generated based on the performance information, including:
[0023] When the employee makes a phone call with any other employee, the employee involved in the phone call is prompted to confirm whether they agree to have the phone call recorded.
[0024] When the employee agrees to have the phone call recorded, the system obtains the employee's job safety performance checklist based on the employee's phone number involved in the phone call; and records the phone call to obtain the corresponding audio file.
[0025] Speech recognition is performed on the content of the audio file to obtain audio keywords; the contextual relationship between the audio keywords is established, and the audio keywords and the contextual relationship are analyzed to obtain appointment time points, assessment items, risk control items and / or safety reporting items, so as to obtain corresponding performance information;
[0026] Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate.
[0027] Furthermore, all employees of the company are pre-selected to use their real names in the company's dedicated chat tool;
[0028] When an employee communicates with any other employee through the company's dedicated chat tool, for the employee involved in the communication, based on their text messages, voice messages, and calls on third-party platforms within the application of the company's dedicated chat tool, corresponding job performance information is obtained. Based on this job performance information and in accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the communication, a personal action certificate for the employee involved in the communication is generated, including:
[0029] When a real name click event is detected on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, the system enters the interface capture state; wherein, the real name click event refers to: the employee clicks on the real name area of any other employee displayed on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool; when no real name click event is detected on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, the system enters the non-capture state.
[0030] When entering the interface capture state, obtain the real names of the employees involved in this communication from the enterprise-specific chat tool, and obtain the corresponding employee's job safety performance list;
[0031] Obtain the content of the text messages in this communication; and / or monitor the operation buttons used by the employees involved in this communication, so as to monitor the content of voice messages and / or the content of calls on third-party platforms based on the functions triggered by the operation buttons.
[0032] Analyze the content of the voice messages and / or the content of the calls on the third-party platform to obtain the corresponding performance information;
[0033] Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate.
[0034] Furthermore, the monitoring of the operation buttons used by employees involved in this communication, and the monitoring of the content of voice messages and / or the content of third-party platform calls based on the functions triggered by the operation buttons, includes:
[0035] When the "send voice message" button is clicked, the content of the voice message is captured.
[0036] When the "Initiate Voice" or "Accept Voice" button is clicked, microphone input is obtained to capture the content of the call on the third-party platform.
[0037] Furthermore, the safety performance evaluation system, by connecting to the company's existing information platform, automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time frame. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, the system generates the employee's personal action certificate, which also includes:
[0038] When an employee makes a phone call during work hours, and the person making the phone call with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, the employee's job safety performance checklist content is used to extract the performance information from the phone call content, and the employee's personal action certificate is generated based on the performance information.
[0039] When an employee exchanges emails during work hours, and the person exchanging emails with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, natural language processing is performed on the content of the emails to obtain content to be processed. According to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and based on the performance information, the employee's personal action certificate is generated.
[0040] When an employee communicates through the company's dedicated chat tool during work hours, and the person communicating with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, the employee obtains relevant job performance information based on text messages, voice messages, and third-party platform calls within the company's dedicated chat tool application. Based on this job performance information, the employee's personal action certificate is generated in accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist.
[0041] Furthermore, prior to the steps of the employee making phone calls, exchanging emails, and / or communicating via company-specific chat tools during work hours, the method further includes:
[0042] The employee pre-groups the phone numbers in their mobile phone address book to set the numbers to be monitored and the numbers not to be monitored during the working hours; wherein, the numbers not to be monitored include the employee's family and friends, and the numbers to be monitored include the phone numbers of any other employee in the company other than the employee, as well as the phone numbers of people added by the employee to the work-related personnel group;
[0043] When an employee makes or receives a call to a phone number that is not grouped in their phone's address book or is not in their phone's address book, the employee is prompted to group the corresponding phone number and store it in their phone's address book. This is so that when the phone number is a number to be monitored during working hours, a personal action certificate for the employee can be generated.
[0044] Secondly, the present invention also provides an apparatus for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, used to implement the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the first aspect, wherein the apparatus for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise comprises:
[0045] At least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executed by the processor for performing the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the first aspect.
[0046] Thirdly, the present invention also provides a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, which are executed by one or more processors to perform the method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in steel enterprises as described in the first aspect.
[0047] Fourthly, a chip is provided, including a processor and an interface for calling and running a computer program stored in a memory, and executing a method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the first aspect.
[0048] Fifthly, a computer program product containing instructions is provided, which, when executed on a computer or processor, causes the computer or processor to perform a method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, as described in the first to fourth aspects and any one of them.
[0049] Sixthly, a system for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise is provided, including the apparatus for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the second aspect, and using the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the first aspect to complete the interaction with the apparatus for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in the second aspect.
[0050] Unlike existing technologies, the present invention has at least the following beneficial effects:
[0051] This invention, based on the organizational structure of steel enterprises, generates a unique job safety performance checklist for each employee. It then obtains the corresponding actual performance data according to this checklist, ensuring clear accountability and coverage for all employees, thus preventing safety performance evaluations from becoming mere formalities. By constructing a safety performance evaluation system, each employee can report on safety management according to their own job safety performance checklist, avoiding numerous omissions and errors in reporting. This achieves the most comprehensive collection of actual performance data, thereby improving the accuracy and practicality of the safety performance evaluation results. A safety performance evaluation model is used to uniformly quantify assessment indicators, enabling a relatively fair and objective analysis of each employee's actual performance. The system automatically outputs safety performance evaluation results, improving efficiency and providing comparative insights for different employees, enhancing the practicality of the evaluation and effectively ensuring the safety management level of steel enterprises.
[0052] Furthermore, the safety performance evaluation system of the present invention introduces an automatic filling function. Based on recording prompts, switching between interface capture and non-capture states, and monitoring operation buttons, the system automatically generates and fills in the performance status based on the job safety performance checklist while avoiding infringement on personal privacy. This helps employees complete the filling in of actual performance status with high quality and quantity, solving the problems that safety performance evaluation systems would bring employees a heavy burden of filling in performance status, increase extra workload, and easily lead to false reporting or misreporting during actual use. Attached Figure Description
[0053] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly described below. Obviously, the drawings described below are merely some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without any creative effort.
[0054] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, as provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
[0055] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a specific example of a job safety performance checklist interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0056] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of another specific example of a job safety performance checklist interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0057] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram illustrating a specific example of displaying a QR code interface for a mini-program on a computer, as provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
[0058] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the sub-module division of a safety performance evaluation system provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0059] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the interface of a WeChat mini-program version of a safety performance evaluation system provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0060] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of a specific example of a task details interface in a mini-program provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0061] Figure 8 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, as provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
[0062] Figure 9 This is a schematic diagram of a specific example of a personal action plan interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0063] Figure 10 This is a schematic diagram of a specific example of a signature interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0064] Figure 11 This is a flowchart illustrating step 50 provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0065] Figure 12 This is a flowchart illustrating step 501a provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0066] Figure 13 This is a flowchart illustrating step 503a provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0067] Figure 14 This is a schematic diagram of a specific example of a chat session list interface provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0068] Figure 15 This is a flowchart illustrating another step 50 provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0069] Figure 16 This is a flowchart illustrating step 503b provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
[0070] Figure 17 This is a schematic diagram of the architecture of a device for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation
[0071] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the invention.
[0072] Unless the context otherwise requires, throughout the specification and claims, the term "comprising" is interpreted as openly inclusive, meaning "including, but not limited to." In the description of the specification, terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "exemplary embodiment," "example," "specific example," or "some examples" are intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic associated with that embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of this disclosure. The illustrative representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics mentioned may be included in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples; that is, although they may be incorporated into embodiments or examples using the above terms for reasons such as order and position, it does not limit them to be incorporated in combination by a single embodiment or example.
[0073] In the description of this invention, it should be understood that the terms "center", "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", etc., indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings. They are only for the convenience of describing this disclosure and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation. Therefore, they should not be construed as limitations on this disclosure.
[0074] In the description of this invention, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined with "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of embodiments of this disclosure, unless otherwise stated, "a plurality of" means two or more. Furthermore, for example, the description may use the prefix "A" or "B" to describe the same type of nouns as two independent entities. In this case, the corresponding features defined with "A" and "B" are used only to distinguish between similar entities and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features.
[0075] In describing some embodiments, the terms "coupled," "coupled," and "connected," and their derivative expressions, may be used. For example, the term "connected" may be used in describing some embodiments to indicate that two or more components have direct physical or electrical contact with each other. Similarly, the term "coupled" may be used in describing some embodiments to indicate that two or more components have direct physical or electrical contact. However, the terms "connected" or "coupled" may also refer to two or more components that do not have direct contact with each other but still cooperate or interact with each other, such as "optical coupling," "wireless connection," etc. The embodiments disclosed herein are not necessarily limited to the scope of this invention.
[0076] In the description of this invention, the expression “A and / or B” (where A and B are used to formally represent specific features) will be used. The corresponding expression includes the following three combinations: only A, only B, and a combination of A and B.
[0077] As used in this invention, “about,” “approximately,” or “approximately” includes the stated value and the average value within an acceptable range of deviation from a particular value, wherein the acceptable range of deviation is determined by a person skilled in the art taking into account the measurement under discussion and the error associated with the measurement of the particular quantity (i.e., the limitations of the measurement system).
[0078] Example 1:
[0079] In existing technologies, the lack of a unified management scheme often prevents safety production responsibilities from covering all employees, leading to unclear responsibilities and buck-passing. Furthermore, safety performance evaluation standards are not quantified, resulting in significant subjectivity and hindering horizontal and vertical comparative analysis. In addition, traditional offline safety performance assessments are labor-intensive and prone to errors. These factors combined result in low efficiency, low accuracy, and poor practicality in safety performance evaluations, ultimately rendering them a mere formality and severely impacting safety management levels.
[0080] To address the aforementioned problems, this invention provides a method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise, and constructs a safety performance evaluation system based on the aforementioned safety performance evaluation model; as follows: Figure 1 As shown, the method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in the steel enterprise includes:
[0081] Step 10: Import the organizational structure of the steel enterprise into the system safety responsibility database for each position. After personalizing the data in the system safety responsibility database, generate a list of safety responsibilities for all employees and job safety duties based on the personalized system safety responsibility database.
[0082] In the context of steel companies, organizational structure refers to the hierarchical responsibility relationship among all employees. For example, frontline employee 1 is responsible for reporting safety information to middle-level manager 2, and middle-level manager 2 is responsible for reporting safety information to senior manager 3.
[0083] Each employee has a corresponding job safety duty checklist. Each employee's job safety duty checklist refers to a general template of the list of tasks that the employee may be responsible for performing within the scope of their responsibilities.
[0084] In this embodiment of the invention, those skilled in the art, combining years of safety management consulting experience with the actual management situation of steel enterprises, can develop a general template for the safety production responsibility system for senior management, middle management, and grassroots personnel in the steel industry. Then, the safety performance evaluation system can match the employee's position to obtain the corresponding general template, serving as their job safety performance checklist. The job safety performance checklist includes, for example, completing weekly safety reports, performance appraisals, and professional title evaluations. The safety performance evaluation system can include a computer terminal and a mini-program terminal, such as... Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment of the invention also provides a specific example of a job safety performance checklist interface in a computer-based safety performance evaluation system; for example... Figure 3 As shown, the content of the job safety performance checklist can be filled in or adjusted through the safety performance evaluation system.
[0085] Step 20: According to the job safety performance checklist, employees upload performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connect with the company's existing information platform to obtain the corresponding actual performance status.
[0086] After an employee logs into the safety performance evaluation system, the system will enter the specific content of the employee's job safety performance checklist to form the employee's actual performance status.
[0087] Step 30: Analyze the actual performance of duties using the safety performance evaluation model and automatically output the job performance evaluation results.
[0088] This invention constructs a safety performance evaluation model, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods to quantitatively weight and qualitatively classify the safety production responsibility assessment indicators for all employees in steel enterprises, thereby forming a safety production responsibility assessment system for steel enterprises. In an optional embodiment, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the weighted factor judgment table method can be used to determine the subjective weight values of the safety performance assessment indicators.
[0089] In one optional embodiment, the safety performance evaluation model can also incorporate an evaluation model algorithm. The safety performance evaluation result can be a job performance score. A specific example of the job performance score formula is as follows:
[0090]
[0091] in, The system automatically outputs a score for job performance, including... A score of ≥95 indicates an excellent job performance rating; 95> A score of ≥90 indicates a good job performance rating; 90> A score of ≥85 indicates a general performance rating. A score of less than 85 indicates an unsatisfactory performance rating. If a result indicator is not met, it is considered a veto item. The value is 0 when a veto item is involved and 1 when no veto item is involved. For process indicators, the weight is 0 < <1, i=1,2,3……; the weight of the j-th performance clause corresponding to the i-th process indicator, 0< <1, j=1,2,3……; The correction coefficient for the j-th performance clause corresponding to the i-th process indicator is selected by the superior when reviewing the subordinate's self-evaluation results. This can be done by consulting the verification materials of the performance clauses and selecting the correction coefficient based on authenticity and satisfaction. 0 < <1.
[0092] Step 40: Display the safety performance evaluation results.
[0093] After the safety performance evaluation system automatically outputs the safety performance evaluation results for the corresponding employees, the employees can view and manage their job safety performance checklist. In an optional embodiment, a data calculation module can be embedded in the management backend of the safety performance evaluation system to automatically and comprehensively statistically analyze and display performance data, accurately and efficiently managing and evaluating the safety performance capabilities of steel enterprises to ensure safe production. Figure 4 As shown, in an optional embodiment, a QR code for the mini-program can be provided on the computer interface to facilitate scanning and opening the mini-program; as... Figure 5 and Figure 6 As shown, the mini-program is divided into different sub-modules according to each employee's job role; for example, by clicking the "My Responsibilities" icon, users can enter the corresponding interface to view the tasks that the currently logged-in employee needs to complete, further view the task details, and upload relevant proof of actual performance on the task details interface (e.g., such as...). Figure 7 (The uploaded personal training qualification certificate is shown). After obtaining the safety performance evaluation results of each employee, the overall performance results of various functional departments and production units can be comprehensively calculated to dynamically assess the company's overall performance.
[0094] This invention, based on the organizational structure and system safety responsibility database of steel enterprises, generates a unique safety production responsibility system and job safety performance checklist for each employee. It then obtains the corresponding actual performance data according to the job safety performance checklist, ensuring clear accountability and coverage of all employees, thus preventing safety performance evaluations from becoming mere formalities. By constructing a safety performance evaluation system, each employee can report on safety management according to their own job safety performance checklist, avoiding numerous omissions and errors in reporting. This achieves the most comprehensive collection of actual performance data, thereby improving the accuracy and practicality of safety performance evaluation results. Using a safety performance evaluation model to uniformly quantify assessment indicators allows for a relatively fair and objective analysis of each employee's actual performance, automatically outputting safety performance evaluation results. This not only improves the efficiency of safety performance evaluations but also provides horizontal and vertical comparative reference value for the safety performance evaluation results of different employees, enhancing the practicality of safety performance evaluations and effectively ensuring the safety management level of steel enterprises.
[0095] Based on this, embodiments of the present invention also provide a method for automatically generating performance status in a safety performance evaluation system, which will be described below:
[0096] In practice, safety performance evaluation systems can place a significant burden on employees in recording their job performance. For example, in addition to their daily work, employees must manually fill out several relevant performance records for the day in the system, adding extra workload. Furthermore, the accuracy of information filled out based on employee memory is low, and the recorded performance may deviate from the actual situation. Moreover, relying on employees to fill out performance records themselves can easily lead to false reporting of involved personnel, events, times, and locations, significantly reducing the accuracy and usefulness of subsequent safety performance evaluations.
[0097] To address this issue, the safety performance evaluation system of this invention introduces a function to automatically generate performance status, wherein the actual performance status includes automatically generated performance status and proactively reported performance status; such as Figure 8 As shown, the step of employees uploading performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connecting with the company's existing information platform, according to the job safety performance checklist, includes:
[0098] Step 50: The safety performance evaluation system automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time range by connecting to the company's existing information platform. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate. The personal action certificate is then automatically filled into the corresponding position of the safety performance evaluation system as the employee's automatically generated performance status.
[0099] The preset time range is selected by those skilled in the art based on the specific usage scenario, and is not limited here.
[0100] Performance information refers to supporting documentation proving that an employee has performed corresponding target-oriented duties; for example, a chat log showing an employee reporting the safety situation at a work site to their supervisor, B. Personal action documentation refers to a description of supporting documentation generated after an employee has performed corresponding target-oriented duties; for example, the employee went to the work site on [date], confirmed that the safety status at the work site complied with safety regulations A, and reported this to their supervisor, B.
[0101] Step 60: The employee views the automatically generated performance status at the corresponding location, and based on the automatically generated performance status, determines whether there are any unreported items within a preset time range; when there are unreported items, the employee adds the corresponding proactive performance status to the computer or mini-program of the safety performance evaluation system based on the unreported items, so that the safety performance evaluation system can obtain the corresponding actual performance status.
[0102] The employees enter basic safety information through the company's existing safety information platform to obtain corresponding job performance information; according to the content format of the employees' job safety performance checklist, the safety performance information of the employees involved in this entry is generated, including safety training information, operator qualification certificates, emergency drill information, safety inspection information or risk assessment information.
[0103] Since an employee's job responsibilities within a preset timeframe are often limited to a few specific tasks, the personal action records an employee needs to generate daily for each specific task are generally within the scope of their job safety performance checklist. The safety performance evaluation system only needs to analyze the employee's work content, match the obtained performance information with the relevant items in their job safety performance checklist, and automatically fill in the information. In special circumstances, for additional work items outside the scope of the employee's job safety performance checklist, the employee must fill them in themselves and report them to the safety performance evaluation system. Furthermore, the automatic generation function of performance records in this embodiment of the invention is only intended to reduce the employee's burden of filling in information. The automatically generated performance records need to be confirmed, modified, and supplemented by the employee before they can be reported to the safety performance evaluation system as actual performance records.
[0104] In an optional embodiment, employees can view their personal action plans in a personal action plan library after logging in; for example, such as Figure 9 As shown in the rectangle and arrow on the right, the generated personal action plan will be automatically filled into this position; when employees need to add a new personal action plan, they can click on the box as shown in the image. Figure 9 Enter the area indicated by the rectangle and arrow on the left. Figure 9 The interface shown, and in such Figure 9 The information should be manually filled in at the location indicated by the rectangle and arrow on the right side. The safety performance evaluation system can inform the employee that the relevant performance items have been automatically generated in their job safety performance checklist by displaying a pop-up message on the interface. Figure 10 As shown, after the employee confirms the actual performance information that has been filled in, the employee can be prompted to sign, so as to record the employee's confirmation status and confirmation time of the automatically generated performance information, and at the same time to prevent impersonation.
[0105] According to the method of this invention, the safety performance evaluation system automatically generates performance information, which is supplemented by employees through their own proactive reporting. The automatic generation replaces most of the performance information that each employee would otherwise have to fill out, greatly simplifying the interaction process between employees and the safety performance evaluation system, reducing the workload of employees, and thus further promoting the implementation of safety performance evaluation. Moreover, since the safety performance evaluation system can automatically fill in information in a uniform format as much as possible, it facilitates data analysis and integration by the safety performance evaluation model, thereby generating more systematic and comprehensive safety performance evaluation results and corresponding performance reports.
[0106] To explain the process of obtaining automatically generated performance information, such as Figure 11 As shown, in step 50, the safety performance evaluation system automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time frame by connecting to the company's existing information platform. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate, including:
[0107] Step 501a: When the employee makes a phone call with any other employee, according to the content format of the job security duty checklist, generate the duty information of the employee involved in this phone call based on the content of the phone call, and generate the corresponding employee's personal action certificate based on the duty information.
[0108] Among them, a mobile phone dialing session refers to a call initiated and maintained by dialing a phone number.
[0109] Step 502a: When the employee exchanges emails with any other employee, the employee involved in the email exchange is obtained based on the email address of the exchange; natural language processing is performed on the content of the email exchange to obtain the content to be processed; according to the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the email exchange, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and a personal action certificate of the employee involved in the email exchange is generated based on the performance information.
[0110] The artificial intelligence model used performs natural language recognition on the email content. The specific type of artificial intelligence model is selected by those skilled in the art based on their own experience, and is not limited here.
[0111] Step 503a: When the employee communicates with any other employee through the company's dedicated chat tool, for the employee involved in this communication, based on the text messages, voice messages and third-party platform calls within the application of the company's dedicated chat tool, the corresponding job performance information is obtained. Based on the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in this communication, and based on the corresponding job performance information, a personal action certificate of the employee involved in this communication is generated.
[0112] In one alternative embodiment, the enterprise-specific chat tool can be a general third-party chat tool or a platform with chat functionality designated by the enterprise; no limitation is made here.
[0113] In most cases, employees need to make appointments before performing tasks. For example, if they need to report to supervisor B that the safety status of the scene meets safety regulations A, they will likely schedule a reporting time with supervisor B via mobile phone dialing or a company-specific chat tool. In this case, if the appointment is made via mobile phone dialing, key phrases like "Hello, supervisor B, I'm coming to report the safety status of the scene now" can be identified from the dialing conversation; alternatively, information about appointments made via email or company-specific chat tools can also be obtained. This embodiment of the invention uses this type of appointment information as an important data source for job performance information. When employees report directly to supervisor B via mobile phone dialing, email, or company-specific chat tools, the corresponding content obtained constitutes job performance information, and so on, which will not be elaborated further here.
[0114] This invention, through acquiring data from the three aforementioned sources, covers communication records of employees in most situations, enabling the labeling of employee behaviors and event nodes during work processes. This aims to cover the vast majority of actual job performance scenarios. After acquiring the data, an artificial intelligence model is used to process it, extracting job performance information and generating corresponding personal action certificates which are then automatically filled out. The artificial intelligence models used for different scenarios are selected by those skilled in the art based on their experience, and are not limited here.
[0115] In existing technologies, while acquiring data from the above three sources, there is often an excessive infringement on employees' personal privacy. To address this issue, embodiments of the present invention restrict the permissions of the safety performance evaluation system. Specifically, to illustrate the process of implementing the automatic filling function based on mobile phone dialing sessions, as follows... Figure 12 As shown, step 501a includes:
[0116] Step 5011: When the employee is having a mobile phone call with any other employee, prompt the employee involved in the mobile phone call to confirm whether they agree to have the mobile phone call recorded.
[0117] For example, when employee X and employee Y are having a phone call, the safety performance evaluation system will broadcast a prompt message to both employees X and Y in the form of voice: "This call will be recorded. To cancel recording, please press button 1." Based on the choices of employees X and Y, they can then determine whether to record the call.
[0118] Step 5012: When the employee agrees to record the current mobile phone call, obtain the corresponding employee's job security performance list based on the employee's phone number involved in the current mobile phone call; record the current mobile phone call and obtain the corresponding recording file.
[0119] For example, when both employees allow recording, the system obtains the phone numbers of employees X and Y, identifies them based on these numbers, and retrieves their job safety performance checklists. The system also records the conversations between employees X and Y and obtains the corresponding audio files.
[0120] Step 5013: Perform speech recognition on the content of the audio file to obtain audio keywords; establish the contextual relationship between the audio keywords, analyze the audio keywords and the contextual relationship to obtain appointment time points, assessment items, risk control items and / or safety reporting items, so as to obtain corresponding performance information.
[0121] Furthermore, it can also combine the time points when the keywords in the recording appear to establish contextual relationships and conduct analysis.
[0122] Step 5014: Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate.
[0123] Artificial intelligence models are used to organize job performance information and transform it into corresponding personal action certificates.
[0124] This invention avoids infringing on the privacy of employees' mobile phone dialing conversations by prompting them to choose whether to record the conversation.
[0125] Because the system can directly distinguish other employees and their family and friends from email addresses during work-related exchanges, the email addresses of all employees are pre-entered into the safety performance evaluation system. Only when an employee is matched is the corresponding email content captured to generate relevant personal action certificates.
[0126] To illustrate the process of implementing autofill functionality based on enterprise-specific chat tools, such as... Figure 13 As shown, step 503a includes:
[0127] Step 5031a: When a real name click event is obtained on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, enter the interface capture state; wherein, the real name click event refers to: the employee clicks on the real name area of any other employee displayed on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool; when no real name click event is obtained on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, enter the non-capture state.
[0128] Specifically, all employees of the company are pre-configured to use their real names in the company's dedicated chat tool, and these real names are then entered into a name database. For example... Figure 14 The image shows an example of the interface of a corporate-specific chat tool. The interface displays a list of chat conversations with other employees, family and friends, and group chats, arranged from top to bottom. The chat conversation boxes displaying the real names of other employees are the real name areas, such as... Figure 14 The area indicated by the middle arrow is the real name area corresponding to real name 2. When an employee using the company's proprietary chat tool clicks on the real name area corresponding to real name 2, the interface will enter capture mode.
[0129] In one optional embodiment, the interface capture state is entered only when the focus obtained by the current interface is on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, and the employee clicks on the real name area of any other employee in the chat session list (for example, the real name area corresponding to real name 2), and the real name of the other employee can be found in the name database.
[0130] In other cases, the safety performance evaluation system is in a non-capture state and does not capture the content of the current interface, effectively avoiding privacy infringement on chat records with other non-employees (such as family and friends) when obtaining performance information.
[0131] Step 5032a: When entering the interface capture state, obtain the real names of the employees involved in this communication from the enterprise-specific chat tool, and obtain the corresponding employee's job safety performance list.
[0132] Step 5033a: Obtain the content of the text messages in this communication; and / or monitor the operation buttons used by the employees involved in this communication, so as to monitor the content of voice messages and / or the content of third-party platform calls based on the functions triggered by the operation buttons.
[0133] The system monitors the user's actions during the communication. When the "send voice message" button is clicked, the system captures the content of the voice message as it is sent. When the "initiate voice" or "receive voice" button is clicked, the system acquires microphone input to obtain the content of the third-party platform call, as these actions trigger a voice call. In this way, the safety performance evaluation system will not access the content of voice messages or third-party platform calls that could compromise the employee's privacy.
[0134] Step 5034a: Analyze the content of the voice message and / or the content of the third-party platform call to obtain the corresponding performance information.
[0135] Step 5035a: Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate.
[0136] Since the content automatically filled in by the embodiments of this invention is automatically obtained and generated by the safety performance evaluation system, in optional embodiments, as long as the modification permissions of the backend database of the safety performance evaluation system are only opened to the highest-level management personnel, it can be fully guaranteed that the corresponding subordinate employees cannot tamper with the automatically generated personal action certificates, thereby effectively avoiding false reporting of relevant participants or false reporting of events, times and locations, and preventing impersonation. After any safety accident occurs, it is easy to trace the upstream and downstream related employees of the accident node, when and where the safety production situation was reported, and the response of the corresponding superior employees after receiving the report (forming as wide a coverage as possible through the above three dimensions of telephone, messages and emails). In addition, the on-site reporting situation should be standardized with the form of stamps and signatures to prevent impersonation, misreporting or false reporting. It should be noted that even if the employee modifies the automatically generated performance status when confirming it, the safety performance evaluation system will store all automatically generated personal action certificates within a certain period of time in the backend database for future reference.
[0137] There is also a significant need for communication between employees and non-employee work-related personnel (e.g., suppliers and outsourced workers). To ensure that the auto-fill function can cover communication with work-related personnel without infringing on personal privacy, such as... Figure 15 As shown, in step 50, the safety performance evaluation system automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time frame by connecting to the company's existing information platform. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, the system generates the employee's personal action certificate, which also includes:
[0138] Step 501b: When the employee makes a phone call during working hours, and the person making the phone call with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, extract the duty information from the content of the phone call according to the content format of the employee's job safety duty list, and generate the employee's personal action certificate based on the duty information.
[0139] The method for determining working hours shall be selected by those skilled in the art based on their own experience and the specific use case, and is not limited here.
[0140] Step 502b: When the employee exchanges emails during working hours, and the person exchanging emails with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, natural language processing is performed on the content of the emails to obtain the content to be processed; according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and the employee's personal action certificate is generated based on the performance information.
[0141] Step 503b: When the employee communicates through the company's dedicated chat tool during working hours, and the person communicating with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, the employee obtains relevant job performance information based on the text messages, voice messages, and third-party platform calls within the company's dedicated chat tool application. Based on the relevant job performance information, the employee's personal action certificate is generated in accordance with the content format of the job safety job performance checklist.
[0142] In the process of obtaining performance information based on voice messages and calls through third-party platforms, personal action certificates are generated according to steps 501a or 503a of this embodiment of the invention to protect the privacy of the employee and work-related personnel. Alternatively, prompts can be provided to allow the relevant employee and work-related personnel to choose whether to record the conversation.
[0143] like Figure 16 As shown, before step 503b, the following steps are also included:
[0144] Step 5031b: The employee pre-groups the phone numbers in their mobile phone address book to set the numbers to be monitored and the numbers not to be monitored during the working hours; wherein, the numbers not to be monitored include the employee's family and friends, and the numbers to be monitored include the phone numbers of any other employee in the company other than the employee, as well as the phone numbers of people added by the employee to the work-related personnel group.
[0145] Step 5032b: When the employee dials or receives a phone number that is not grouped in their mobile phone address book or is not in their mobile phone address book, the employee is prompted to group the corresponding phone number and store it in the mobile phone address book so that when it is during working hours and the phone number belongs to the number to be monitored, the employee's personal action plan and personal action certificate can be generated.
[0146] In one alternative implementation, all listening can be canceled by the employee at any time to ensure privacy.
[0147] Since the primary purpose of this invention is to simplify the process of employees filling in job performance information rather than to monitor employees, if there is any contact that an employee does not want to be monitored, the employee can actively cancel the system's automatic filling function by classifying that contact into the non-monitored contact set, and then the employee can manually fill in the relevant job performance information.
[0148] It should be noted that if an employee actively cancels the system's auto-fill function, any loss of performance information records due to the lack of monitoring and recording will be borne by the employee. For example, if an employee chooses to cancel the auto-fill function when communicating with a supplier on a third-party platform, and subsequently, when the employee communicates with the supplier through that third-party platform to report on project security risks for a specific date, the safety performance system cannot proactively obtain the communication messages between the two parties. There is no direct evidence to prove that the project security risk situation was communicated with the supplier, and the employee must supplement the relevant communication information, such as proactively uploading screenshots as proof of the communication. In an optional embodiment, the system can provide a risk warning in the form of a pop-up text message when an employee actively chooses to cancel the auto-fill function.
[0149] Example 3:
[0150] like Figure 17 The diagram shown is a schematic representation of the architecture of a device for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise according to an embodiment of the present invention. The device for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise according to this embodiment includes one or more processors 21 and a memory 22. Wherein, Figure 17 Take a processor 21 as an example.
[0151] Processor 21 and memory 22 can be connected via a bus or other means. Figure 17 Taking the example of a connection between China and Israel via a bus.
[0152] The memory 22, as a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-volatile software programs and non-volatile computer-executable programs, such as the method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise in this embodiment. The processor 21 executes the method for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise by running the non-volatile software programs and instructions stored in the memory 22.
[0153] Memory 22 may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, memory 22 may optionally include memory remotely located relative to processor 21, which can be connected to processor 21 via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.
[0154] The program instructions / modules are stored in the memory 22. When executed by one or more processors 21, they perform the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in steel enterprises as described in the above embodiments. For example, they perform the above-described... Figure 1 , Figures 8-13 and Figures 15-16 The steps shown.
[0155] This invention also provides a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions that are executed by one or more processors, for example... Figure 17 A processor 21 enables one or more of the processors to execute the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise according to a specific embodiment of the present invention, for example, executing the above-described method. Figure 1 , Figures 8-13 and Figures 15-16 The steps shown can also be implemented. Figure 17 The various modules and units described above; or the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in steel enterprises as described in the specific embodiments of the present invention, for example, performing the above-described... Figure 1 , Figures 8-13 and Figures 15-16 The steps shown can also be implemented. Figure 17 The various modules and units mentioned above.
[0156] It is worth noting that the information interaction and execution process between the modules and units in the above-mentioned device and system are based on the same concept as the processing method embodiment of the present invention. For details, please refer to the description in the method embodiment of the present invention, and will not be repeated here.
[0157] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, which may include: read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disk or optical disk, etc.
[0158] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, and improvements made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A method for performance evaluation of safety performance by all employees in an iron and steel enterprise, characterized in that, Construct a safety performance evaluation model; based on the safety performance evaluation model, construct a safety performance evaluation system; employees pre-group the phone numbers in their mobile phone address book to set monitored and unmonitored numbers during working hours; wherein, the unmonitored numbers include the employee's family and friends, and the monitored numbers include the phone numbers of any employee other than the employee in the company, as well as the phone numbers of people added by the employee to the work-related personnel group; when the employee dials or answers a phone number that is not grouped in their mobile phone address book or is not in their mobile phone address book, the employee is prompted to group the corresponding phone number and store it in the mobile phone address book, so that when it is during working hours and the phone number belongs to the monitored number, the employee's personal action certificate can be generated; The methods for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in steel enterprises include: The organizational structure of the steel enterprise is imported into the system safety responsibility database for each position. After the data in the system safety responsibility database is personalized, a safety responsibility system for all employees and a list of safety duties for each position are generated based on the personalized system safety responsibility database. According to the job safety performance checklist, employees upload performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connect with the company's existing information platform to obtain the corresponding actual performance status. When the employee makes a phone call with any other employee, the employee whose number is to be monitored in this phone call is prompted to confirm whether they agree to have the phone call recorded. When the employee agrees to have the phone call recorded, the system obtains the employee's job safety performance checklist based on the employee's phone number involved in the phone call; and records the phone call to obtain the corresponding audio file. Speech recognition is performed on the content of the audio file to obtain audio keywords; the contextual relationship between the audio keywords is established, and the audio keywords and the contextual relationship are analyzed to obtain appointment time points, assessment items, risk control items and / or safety reporting items, so as to obtain corresponding performance information; Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate; The actual performance of duties is analyzed using the safety performance evaluation model, and the job performance evaluation results are automatically output. The results of the safety performance evaluation are displayed.
2. The method for performance evaluation of all employees' safety responsibilities in steel enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, The actual performance of duties includes automatically generated performance information and proactively reported performance information. According to the aforementioned job safety performance checklist, employees upload performance verification materials through the safety performance assessment system's mini-program or connect with the company's existing information platform, including: The safety performance evaluation system connects to the company's existing information platform to automatically obtain the employee's performance information within a preset time range. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate and automatically fills it into the corresponding position in the safety performance evaluation system as the employee's automatically generated performance status. The employee views the automatically generated performance status at the corresponding location and, based on the automatically generated performance status, determines whether there are any unreported items within a preset time range. When there are unreported items, the employee adds the corresponding proactive performance status to the computer or mini-program of the safety performance evaluation system based on the unreported items, so that the safety performance evaluation system can obtain the corresponding actual performance status.
3. The method for performance evaluation of safety duties by all employees in steel enterprises according to claim 2, characterized in that, The safety performance evaluation system, by connecting to the company's existing information platform, automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time frame. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate, including: When the employee makes a phone call with any other employee, the employee's job performance information is generated according to the content format of the job safety performance checklist and the content of the phone call, and the employee's personal action certificate is generated based on the job performance information. When an employee exchanges emails with any other employee, the employee involved in the email exchange is obtained based on the email address of the exchange; natural language processing is performed on the content of the email exchange to obtain content to be processed; according to the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the email exchange, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and a personal action certificate of the employee involved in the email exchange is generated based on the performance information. When an employee communicates with any other employee through the company's dedicated chat tool, the employee involved in the communication will have their job performance information obtained based on the text messages, voice messages, and third-party platform calls within the application of the company's dedicated chat tool. In accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the communication, a personal action certificate of the employee involved in the communication will be generated based on the corresponding job performance information. Adding the corresponding proactive reporting of performance status to the computer or mini-program version of the safety performance evaluation system includes: The employees enter basic safety information through the company's existing safety information platform to obtain corresponding job performance information; according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist, the safety performance information of the employees involved in this entry is generated, including safety training information, operator qualification certificates, emergency drill information, safety inspection information or risk assessment information.
4. The method for performance evaluation of all employees' safety responsibilities in steel enterprises according to claim 3, characterized in that, The names of all employees in the company are pre-set to their real names in the company's dedicated chat tool; When an employee communicates with any other employee through the company's dedicated chat tool, for the employee involved in the communication, based on their text messages, voice messages, and calls on third-party platforms within the application of the company's dedicated chat tool, corresponding job performance information is obtained. Based on this job performance information and in accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist of the employee involved in the communication, a personal action certificate for the employee involved in the communication is generated, including: When a real name click event is detected on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, the system enters the interface capture state; wherein, the real name click event refers to: the employee clicks on the real name area of any other employee displayed on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool; when no real name click event is detected on the interface of the enterprise-specific chat tool, the system enters the non-capture state. When entering the interface capture state, obtain the real names of the employees involved in this communication from the enterprise-specific chat tool, and obtain the corresponding employee's job safety performance list; Obtain the content of the text messages in this communication; and / or monitor the operation buttons used by the employees involved in this communication, so as to monitor the content of voice messages and / or the content of calls on third-party platforms based on the functions triggered by the operation buttons. Analyze the content of the voice messages and / or the content of the calls on the third-party platform to obtain the corresponding performance information; Fill in the corresponding job performance information according to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist to generate the employee's personal action certificate.
5. The method for performance evaluation of safety duties by all employees in steel enterprises according to claim 4, characterized in that, The monitoring of the operation buttons used by employees involved in this communication, and the monitoring of the content of voice messages and / or third-party platform calls based on the functions triggered by the operation buttons, includes: When the "send voice message" button is clicked, the content of the voice message is captured. When the "Initiate Voice" or "Accept Voice" button is clicked, microphone input is obtained to capture the content of the call on the third-party platform.
6. The method for performance evaluation of safety duties by all employees in an iron and steel enterprise according to claim 2, characterized in that, The safety performance evaluation system, by connecting to the company's existing information platform, automatically obtains the employee's performance information within a preset time range. Based on the job safety performance checklist and the performance information, it generates the employee's personal action certificate, which also includes: When an employee makes a phone call during work hours, and the person making the phone call with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, the employee's job safety performance checklist content is used to extract the performance information from the phone call content, and the employee's personal action certificate is generated based on the performance information. When an employee exchanges emails during work hours, and the person exchanging emails with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, natural language processing is performed on the content of the emails to obtain content to be processed. According to the content format of the employee's job safety performance checklist, the corresponding performance information is extracted from the content to be processed, and based on the performance information, the employee's personal action certificate is generated. When an employee communicates through the company's dedicated chat tool during work hours, and the person communicating with the employee is in the employee's set of work-related personnel, the employee obtains relevant job performance information based on text messages, voice messages, and third-party platform calls within the company's dedicated chat tool application. Based on this job performance information, the employee's personal action certificate is generated in accordance with the content format of the job safety performance checklist.
7. A device for evaluating the safety performance of all employees in an iron and steel enterprise, characterized in that, The device for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise includes at least one processor and a memory. The at least one processor and the memory are connected via a data bus. The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor. After being executed by the processor, the instructions are used to implement the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in any one of claims 1-6.
8. A non-volatile computer storage medium, characterized in that, The computer storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, which are executed by one or more processors to perform the method for assessing the safety performance of all employees in a steel enterprise as described in any one of claims 1-6.