Business and finance integration-based enterprise high-quality development evaluation method and related components

Abstract

The invention relates to an enterprise high-quality development evaluation method based on business and finance integration and related components, and is applied to the technical field of enterprise development evaluation. Determining an evaluation index corresponding to each key field; determining an evaluation method based on the key field and the evaluation index, wherein the evaluation method comprises a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; and carrying out enterprise high-quality development evaluation based on the evaluation method. The method has the effect of improving the efficiency and accuracy of enterprise high-quality development evaluation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of enterprise development assessment, and in particular to an enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration and related components. Background Art

[0002] With the acceleration of global economic integration and increasingly fierce market competition, enterprises are facing unprecedented challenges and opportunities. In order to maintain their advantages in the competition, enterprises must continuously improve their core competitiveness and achieve high-quality development. Through the enterprise high-quality development assessment, enterprises can comprehensively evaluate their own development status, identify advantages and disadvantages, and formulate scientific development strategies.

[0003] The current assessment method mainly relies on manual data collection and processing. The processing method lacks unified management standards, and the efficiency and accuracy of the assessment are low. Summary of the invention

[0004] In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the evaluation of high-quality development of enterprises, this application provides an enterprise high-quality development evaluation method and related components based on business and financial integration.

[0005] In the first aspect, this application provides a method for evaluating the high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration, which adopts the following technical solutions: A method for evaluating the high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration, including: Get key areas; Determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; Determine an evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators, wherein the evaluation method includes a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; Conduct an assessment of the high-quality development of the enterprise based on the described assessment method.

[0006] By adopting the above-mentioned technical solutions, key areas are obtained and evaluation indicators of key areas are determined. Capability assessment methods and development assessment methods are determined through key areas and evaluation indicators. The current capability level of the enterprise can be assessed through the capability assessment method, and the high-quality development level of the enterprise can be assessed through the development assessment method. Automated and diversified assessment methods improve the efficiency of the enterprise's high-quality development assessment, and by determining key areas, the accuracy of the enterprise's high-quality development assessment is improved.

[0007] Optionally, determining the evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators includes: Acquire an indicator calculation method based on the evaluation indicator; Count the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; Determine a first weight of each of the evaluation indicators based on the quantity; A capability assessment method is determined based on the first weight and the indicator calculation method.

[0008] By adopting the above technical solution and determining the first weight of each evaluation indicator, the reliability of the capability assessment method is improved. By using this capability assessment method, the accuracy of the enterprise's high-quality development assessment is improved.

[0009] Optionally, determining the evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators includes: Obtaining a second weight corresponding to the evaluation index; Determine a first score for each of the evaluation indicators based on the second weight; Obtain the standard value type and standard value quantity corresponding to the evaluation index; Determine an indicator scoring method based on the first score, the standard value type, and the standard value quantity; Determine the development evaluation method based on the indicator scoring method and the scoring aggregation method.

[0010] By adopting the above technical solution, by determining the second weight of each evaluation indicator, and determining different indicator scoring methods for each evaluation indicator according to the type of standard value and the number of standard values, the reliability of the development evaluation method is improved. By evaluating through this development evaluation method, the accuracy of the enterprise's high-quality development evaluation is improved.

[0011] Optionally, the method for determining an indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the standard value quantity includes: Determine the evaluation indicator whose standard value quantity is 1 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the first evaluation indicator; If the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the standard value, the indicator score is the first score; If the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is less than the standard value, the indicator score = first score - ⌈ (standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0012] Optionally, the method for determining an indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the standard value quantity includes: Determine the evaluation indicator whose number of standard values ​​is 2 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the second evaluation indicator; Dividing the standard value into a first standard value and a second standard value based on the standard value type; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the first standard value, the indicator score is the first score; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation index is less than the first standard value, and greater than or equal to the second standard value, the index score is the second score; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation index is less than the second standard value, the index score = second score - ⌈ (second standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the index score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the index score.

[0013] Optionally, the enterprise high-quality development assessment based on the assessment method includes: Acquiring indicator data based on the indicator calculation method; Calculate the actual value of the evaluation index based on the index calculation method and the index data; Determine the dimension value of the key field based on the actual value and the first weight; Building a radar chart based on the dimension values ​​and the key areas; Calculating a development index score based on the development assessment method and the actual value; An assessment of the high-quality development of an enterprise is conducted based on the development index score and the radar chart.

[0014] By adopting the above technical solution and constructing a radar chart through key areas and corresponding dimension values, the ability levels of various aspects of the enterprise can be evaluated more clearly and intuitively. By calculating the development index score through the development evaluation method and the actual value of the evaluation indicators, the high-quality development level of the enterprise can be evaluated more intuitively.

[0015] Optionally, after calculating the actual value of the evaluation index based on the index calculation method and the index data, the method further includes: Determine warning areas based on the types of key areas mentioned; Determine the evaluation indicator corresponding to the warning field as the warning indicator; Get the warning threshold of the warning indicator; If the actual value of the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, a warning is issued.

[0016] By adopting the above technical solution, when the actual value of the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, a warning is issued in time, so that the staff can discover and adjust the abnormality in time.

[0017] In the second aspect, the present application provides a device for evaluating high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration, which adopts the following technical solution: An enterprise high-quality development evaluation device based on business and financial integration, comprising: Data acquisition module, used to acquire key fields; An indicator determination module, used to determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; A method determination module, used to determine an evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators, wherein the evaluation method includes a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; The development assessment module is used to conduct high-quality development assessment of an enterprise based on the assessment method.

[0018] By adopting the above-mentioned technical solutions, key areas are obtained and evaluation indicators of key areas are determined. Capability assessment methods and development assessment methods are determined through key areas and evaluation indicators. The current capability level of the enterprise can be assessed through the capability assessment method, and the high-quality development level of the enterprise can be assessed through the development assessment method. Automated and diversified assessment methods improve the efficiency of the enterprise's high-quality development assessment, and by determining key areas, the accuracy of the enterprise's high-quality development assessment is improved.

[0019] In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, which adopts the following technical solution: An electronic device comprises a processor, wherein the processor is coupled to a memory; The memory stores a computer program that can be loaded by the processor and execute the enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration as described in any one of the first aspects.

[0020] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which adopts the following technical solution: A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that can be loaded by a processor and execute the enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration as described in any one of the first aspects. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a method for evaluating high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0022] Figure 2 It is a structural block diagram of an enterprise high-quality development assessment device based on business and financial integration provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0023] Figure 3 It is a structural block diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0024] The present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0025] The embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating the high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration, which can be executed by an electronic device, which can be a server or a terminal device, wherein the server can be an independent physical server, or a server cluster or distributed system composed of multiple physical servers, or a cloud server providing cloud computing services. The terminal device can be a smart phone, a tablet computer, a desktop computer, etc., but is not limited thereto.

[0026] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical solution in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0027] In addition, the term "and / or" in this article is only a description of the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, the character " / " in this article, unless otherwise specified, generally means that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship.

[0028] like Figure 1 As shown, a method for evaluating high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration is described as follows (steps S101 to S104): Step S101: Acquire key fields.

[0029] Before conducting an assessment of the high-quality development of an enterprise, we first determine the "1+2+4+N" model. "1" represents the central main line, with value creation capability as the central main line; "2" represents the two major supports, with innovation-driven and management empowerment as the two major supports; "4" represents the four control valves, with rate of return, expenditure rate, turnover rate and debt ratio as the four control valves; and "N" represents N key value creation points, which are determined based on the actual situation of the enterprise.

[0030] Obtain key areas from the database or management personnel. The key areas include four control valves and N key value creation points. Each control valve and each key value creation point has corresponding financial indicators or business indicators.

[0031] In this embodiment, the indicators corresponding to the four control valves are as follows: Rate of return: per capita profit contribution value, contract price difference rate; Expenditure rate: the proportion of cost to operating income, and the per capita expenses of the centralized / market-oriented (non-centralized) business divisions; Turnover rate: net operating cycle, working capital return rate; Debt ratio: operating cash ratio, core assets and liabilities growth ratio.

[0032] The indicators corresponding to the two (N) key value creation points are as follows: Growth capability: market-oriented (non-centrally built) revenue growth rate, market-oriented (non-centrally built) revenue share; Technological innovation: ratio of expensed R&D investment to revenue.

[0033] Step S102: Determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area.

[0034] In this embodiment, there are six key areas, namely, rate of return (profitability), expenditure rate (cost control), turnover rate (operating capacity), debt ratio (solvency), growth capacity and technological innovation. Evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area are obtained from management personnel. The evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area are the same as above and will not be repeated here.

[0035] Step S103: Determine the evaluation method based on the key areas and evaluation indicators.

[0036] Among them, the assessment methods include capability assessment methods and development assessment methods. The capability assessment method is the method of assessing each key area, and the development assessment method is the method of calculating the evaluation indicators to obtain the development index score.

[0037] Specifically, the evaluation method is determined based on key areas and evaluation indicators, including: obtaining an indicator calculation method based on the evaluation indicators; counting the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area; determining a first weight of each evaluation indicator based on the number; and determining a capability evaluation method based on the first weight and the indicator calculation method.

[0038] In this embodiment, each evaluation indicator has a different indicator calculation method. The indicator calculation method corresponding to the evaluation indicator is obtained from the database, for example: expensed R&D investment to revenue ratio = R&D expenses / operating income × 100%. The number of evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area is counted. Only the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to scientific and technological innovation is 1, and the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to other key areas is 2. Therefore, the first weight corresponding to the expensed R&D investment to revenue ratio is 100%, and the first weights corresponding to the remaining 10 evaluation indicators are all 50%. The capability assessment method is to obtain the percentage value corresponding to each key area through the percentage value (actual value) corresponding to each evaluation indicator and the first weight. For example: the percentage value corresponding to profitability = the percentage value corresponding to the per capita profit contribution value × 50% + the percentage value corresponding to the contract price difference rate × 50%.

[0039] Specifically, the evaluation method is determined based on key areas and evaluation indicators, including: obtaining the second weight corresponding to the evaluation indicator; determining the first score of each evaluation indicator based on the second weight; obtaining the standard value type and the number of standard values ​​corresponding to the evaluation indicator; determining the indicator scoring method based on the first score, the standard value type and the number of standard values; and determining the development evaluation method based on the indicator scoring method and the scoring summary method.

[0040] In this embodiment, the second weight corresponding to each evaluation indicator is obtained from the database. The second weight is the indicator weight determined by expert scoring or questionnaire survey. The sum of the second weights corresponding to all evaluation indicators is 1. The first score of the evaluation indicator = 100×the second weight. The first score is the highest score corresponding to the evaluation indicator. For example, the first weight corresponding to the four evaluation indicators of working capital return rate, core asset and liability growth ratio, market-oriented (non-integrated construction) revenue share, and per capita expense of the integrated construction / market-oriented (non-integrated construction) business division is 5%, and the corresponding first score is 5 points. The first weight corresponding to the five evaluation indicators of per capita profit contribution value, cost and expense ratio to operating income, operating cash ratio, market-oriented (non-integrated construction) revenue growth rate, and expensed R&D investment to revenue ratio is 10%, and the corresponding first score is 10 points. The first weight corresponding to the two evaluation indicators of net operating cycle and contract price difference rate is 15%, and the corresponding first score is 15 points.

[0041] The standard value type and number of standard values ​​corresponding to each evaluation indicator are obtained from the database. Standard values ​​include: budget value, industry average, company average and special threshold (which can be 60%). The indicator scoring method corresponding to the evaluation indicator is determined according to the first score, standard value type and number of standard values ​​corresponding to the evaluation indicator. The development assessment method is the method for calculating the development index score. The scoring aggregation method can be to sum the indicator scores corresponding to each evaluation indicator. The development index score is the sum of the indicator scores corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

[0042] Furthermore, an indicator scoring method is determined based on the standard value type and the number of standard values, including: determining an evaluation indicator whose standard value number is 1 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as a first evaluation indicator; if an actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the standard value, the indicator score is a first score; if the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is less than the standard value, the indicator score = first score - ⌈ (standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0043] The indicator types corresponding to the evaluation indicators include incremental evaluation indicators and decremental evaluation indicators. The incremental evaluation indicators, that is, the larger the numerical value corresponding to the evaluation indicators, the better, that is, the larger the numerical value, the higher the score; the decremental evaluation indicators, that is, the smaller the numerical value corresponding to the evaluation indicators, the better, that is, the smaller the numerical value, the higher the score.

[0044] In this embodiment, the evaluation indicator with a standard value quantity of 1 and an indicator type of an incremental evaluation indicator is determined as the first evaluation indicator. The first evaluation indicator includes the expensed R&D investment to revenue ratio, the operating cash ratio, the core assets and liabilities growth ratio, and the per capita profit contribution value.

[0045] For the first evaluation indicator, if the calculated actual value (which can be a percentage value) is greater than or equal to the standard value, the indicator score is the first score (i.e., full score); if the actual value is less than the standard value, the indicator score = the first score - ⌈ (standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters, which can be obtained from the database. The first preset parameter and the second preset parameter corresponding to each evaluation indicator may be the same or different, and are not specifically limited here. If the indicator score calculated by the above indicator score calculation formula is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score, that is, the indicator score cannot be less than 0.

[0046] Furthermore, the indicator scoring method is determined based on the standard value type and the number of standard values, including: determining an evaluation indicator whose number of standard values ​​is 2 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the second evaluation indicator; dividing the standard value into a first standard value and a second standard value based on the standard value type; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the first standard value, the indicator score is the first score; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is less than the first standard value, and greater than or equal to the second standard value, the indicator score is the second score; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is less than the second standard value, the indicator score = the second score - ⌈ (second standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0047] In this embodiment, the evaluation indicator with a standard value quantity of 2 and an indicator type of incremental evaluation indicator is determined as the second evaluation indicator. The second evaluation indicator includes working capital return rate, market-oriented (non-unified construction) revenue proportion, market-oriented (non-unified construction) revenue growth rate, and contract price difference rate.

[0048] The standard value whose standard value type is budget value is determined as the first standard value, and the other standard value is determined as the second standard value. For the second evaluation index, if the calculated actual value (which can be a percentage value) is greater than or equal to the first standard value, the index score is the first score (i.e., full score); if the actual value is less than the first standard value, and greater than or equal to the second standard value, the index score is the second score (pre-set, obtained from the database, and the second score is less than the first score). If the actual value is less than the second standard value, the index score = the second score - ⌈ (second standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter. If the index score calculated by the above index score calculation formula is less than 0, 0 is determined as the index score.

[0049] Furthermore, the evaluation indicator with a standard value quantity of 1 and an indicator type of reduction evaluation indicator is determined as the third evaluation indicator. The third evaluation indicator includes the proportion of cost and expenses to operating income and the per capita expense of the unified construction / market-oriented (non-unified construction) business division.

[0050] For the third evaluation index, if the calculated actual value (which can be a percentage value) is less than or equal to the standard value, the index score is the first score (i.e., full score); if the actual value is greater than the standard value, the index score = the first score - ⌈ (actual value - standard value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters and can be obtained from the database. If the index score calculated by the above index score calculation formula is less than 0, 0 is determined as the index score.

[0051] Further, an evaluation indicator whose standard value quantity is 2 and whose indicator type is a reduction evaluation indicator is determined as a fourth evaluation indicator, and the fourth evaluation indicator includes a net operating cycle.

[0052] The standard value whose standard value type is budget value is determined as the first standard value, and the other standard value is determined as the second standard value. For the fourth evaluation indicator, if the calculated actual value (which can be a percentage value) is less than or equal to the first standard value, the indicator score is the first score (i.e., full score); if the actual value is greater than the first standard value and less than or equal to the second standard value, the indicator score is the second score (pre-set, obtained from the database, and the second score is less than the first score). If the actual value is greater than the second standard value, the indicator score = the second score - ⌈ (actual value - second standard value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter. If the indicator score calculated by the above indicator score calculation formula is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0053] Step S104: Conduct an assessment of the high-quality development of the enterprise based on the assessment method.

[0054] Specifically, an assessment of the high-quality development of an enterprise is conducted based on the assessment method, including: obtaining indicator data based on the indicator calculation method; calculating the actual value of the evaluation indicator based on the indicator calculation method and the indicator data; determining the dimension value of the key area based on the actual value and the first weight; constructing a radar chart based on the dimension value and the key area; calculating the development index score based on the development assessment method and the actual value; and conducting an assessment of the high-quality development of the enterprise based on the development index score and the radar chart.

[0055] In this embodiment, when conducting an enterprise high-quality development assessment, indicator data (for example, actual R&D expenses, actual operating income, etc.) are obtained from a database or staff according to the indicator parameters included in the indicator calculation method (for example, R&D expenses, operating income, etc.), and the indicator data are calculated according to the indicator calculation method to obtain the actual value of each evaluation indicator. The dimension value of each key area = sum (the actual value of the corresponding evaluation indicator × the first weight), and a six-dimensional radar chart is constructed. Each key area corresponds to a dimension in the six-dimensional radar chart, and the corresponding dimension value is added to the six-dimensional radar chart, and the six-dimensional radar chart is visualized; the standard value corresponding to each evaluation indicator is obtained from the database or staff, and the development index score is calculated according to the development evaluation method and the actual value of each evaluation indicator. The enterprise high-quality development assessment can be conducted more conveniently and intuitively based on the development index score and the radar chart.

[0056] Specifically, after calculating the actual value of the evaluation indicator based on the indicator calculation method and the indicator data, the method also includes: determining the warning area based on the type of the key area; determining the evaluation indicator corresponding to the warning area as the warning indicator; obtaining the warning threshold of the warning indicator; if the actual value of the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, then issuing a warning.

[0057] In this embodiment, the type of key areas is obtained from the staff, that is, whether a warning is needed, the key areas that need warning are determined as warning areas, the evaluation indicators corresponding to the warning areas are determined as warning indicators, and the warning threshold is obtained from the staff. When the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, a warning is required.

[0058] Figure 2 A structural block diagram of an enterprise high-quality development assessment device 200 based on business and financial integration provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0059] like Figure 2 As shown, the enterprise high-quality development evaluation device 200 based on business and financial integration mainly includes: Data acquisition module 201, used to acquire key fields; An indicator determination module 202 is used to determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area; A method determination module 203 is used to determine an evaluation method based on key areas and evaluation indicators, wherein the evaluation method includes a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; The development assessment module 204 is used to conduct an assessment of the high-quality development of an enterprise based on an assessment method.

[0060] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the method determination module 203 is also specifically used to determine the evaluation method based on key areas and evaluation indicators, including: obtaining an indicator calculation method based on the evaluation indicators; counting the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to each key area; determining the first weight of each evaluation indicator based on the number; and determining the capability evaluation method based on the first weight and the indicator calculation method.

[0061] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the method determination module 203 is also specifically used to determine the evaluation method based on key areas and evaluation indicators, including: obtaining the second weight corresponding to the evaluation indicator; determining the first score of each evaluation indicator based on the second weight; obtaining the standard value type and the number of standard values ​​corresponding to the evaluation indicator; determining the indicator scoring method based on the first score, the standard value type and the number of standard values; determining the development evaluation method based on the indicator scoring method and the scoring summary method.

[0062] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the method determination module 203 is also specifically used to determine the indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the number of standard values, including: determining an evaluation indicator whose standard value number is 1 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as a first evaluation indicator; if the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the standard value, the indicator score is the first score; if the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is less than the standard value, the indicator score = the first score - ⌈ (standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0063] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the method determination module 203 is also specifically used to determine the indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the number of standard values, including: determining an evaluation indicator whose number of standard values ​​is 2 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the second evaluation indicator; dividing the standard value into a first standard value and a second standard value based on the standard value type; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the first standard value, the indicator score is the first score; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is less than the first standard value, and greater than or equal to the second standard value, the indicator score is the second score; if the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is less than the second standard value, the indicator score = the second score - ⌈ (second standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

[0064] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the development assessment module 204 is also specifically used to conduct high-quality development assessment of the enterprise based on the assessment method, including: obtaining indicator data based on the indicator calculation method; calculating the actual value of the evaluation indicator based on the indicator calculation method and the indicator data; determining the dimension value of the key area based on the actual value and the first weight; constructing a radar chart based on the dimension value and the key area; calculating the development index score based on the development assessment method and the actual value; and conducting high-quality development assessment of the enterprise based on the development index score and the radar chart.

[0065] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, the development assessment module 204 is also specifically used to, after calculating the actual value of the evaluation indicator based on the indicator calculation method and the indicator data, also include: determining the warning area based on the type of key areas; determining the evaluation indicator corresponding to the warning area as the warning indicator; obtaining the warning threshold of the warning indicator; if the actual value of the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, then issuing a warning.

[0066] In one example, the module in any of the above devices can be one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the above methods, such as: one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or, one or more digital signal processors (DSPs), or, one or more field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or a combination of at least two of these integrated circuit forms.

[0067] For another example, when the modules in the device can be implemented in the form of a processing element scheduling program, the processing element can be a general-purpose processor, such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other processor that can call a program. For another example, these modules can be integrated together and implemented in the form of a system-on-a-chip (SOC).

[0068] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described devices and modules can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0069] Figure 3 A structural block diagram of an electronic device 300 provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0070] like Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device 300 includes a processor 301 and a memory 302 , and may further include an information input / information output (I / O) interface 303 , one or more of a communication component 304 , and a communication bus 305 .

[0071] Among them, the processor 301 is used to control the overall operation of the electronic device 300 to complete all or part of the steps of the above-mentioned enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration; the memory 302 is used to store various types of data to support the operation of the electronic device 300, and these data may include, for example, instructions for any application or method for operating on the electronic device 300, and application-related data. The memory 302 can be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as static random access memory (Static Random Access Memory, SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, EPROM), programmable read-only memory (Programmable Read-Only Memory, PROM), read-only memory (Read-Only Memory, ROM), magnetic memory, flash memory, disk or optical disk. One or more.

[0072] The I / O interface 303 provides an interface between the processor 301 and other interface modules, and the above-mentioned other interface modules can be keyboards, mice, buttons, etc. These buttons can be virtual buttons or physical buttons. The communication component 304 is used for wired or wireless communication between the electronic device 300 and other devices. Wireless communication, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Near Field Communication (NFC), 2G, 3G or 4G, or a combination of one or more of them, so the corresponding communication component 304 can include: Wi-Fi components, Bluetooth components, NFC components.

[0073] The electronic device 300 can be implemented by one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), digital signal processors (DSP), digital signal processing devices (DSPD), programmable logic devices (PLD), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors or other electronic components to execute the enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration given in the above embodiment.

[0074] The communication bus 305 may include a path to transmit information between the above components. The communication bus 305 may be a PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect) bus or an EISA (Extended Industry Standard Architecture) bus, etc. The communication bus 305 may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc.

[0075] The electronic device 300 may include, but is not limited to, mobile terminals such as mobile phones, laptop computers, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), PMPs (portable multimedia players), vehicle-mounted terminals (such as vehicle-mounted navigation terminals), etc., and fixed terminals such as digital TVs, desktop computers, etc., and may also be servers, etc.

[0076] The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-mentioned enterprise high-quality development assessment method based on business and financial integration are implemented.

[0077] The computer-readable storage medium may include: a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other media that can store program codes.

[0078] The terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that includes a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

[0079] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and an explanation of the technical principles used. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of application involved in the present application is not limited to the technical solution formed by a specific combination of the above technical features, but should also cover other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalent features without departing from the aforementioned application concept. For example, the above features are replaced with (but not limited to) technical features with similar functions applied in the present application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating high-quality development of an enterprise based on business and financial integration, characterized in that: include: Get key areas; Determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; Determine an evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators, wherein the evaluation method includes a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; Conduct an assessment of the high-quality development of the enterprise based on the described assessment method.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining of the evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators includes: Acquire an indicator calculation method based on the evaluation indicator; Count the number of evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; Determine a first weight of each of the evaluation indicators based on the quantity; A capability assessment method is determined based on the first weight and the indicator calculation method.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining of the evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators includes: Obtaining a second weight corresponding to the evaluation index; Determine a first score for each of the evaluation indicators based on the second weight; Obtain the standard value type and standard value quantity corresponding to the evaluation index; Determine an indicator scoring method based on the first score, the standard value type, and the standard value quantity; Determine the development evaluation method based on the indicator scoring method and the scoring aggregation method.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that The method for determining an indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the standard value quantity includes: Determine the evaluation indicator whose standard value quantity is 1 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the first evaluation indicator; If the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the standard value, the indicator score is the first score; If the actual value corresponding to the first evaluation indicator is less than the standard value, the indicator score = first score - ⌈ (standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the indicator score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the indicator score.

5. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The method for determining an indicator scoring method based on the standard value type and the standard value quantity includes: Determine the evaluation indicator whose number of standard values ​​is 2 and whose indicator type is an incremental evaluation indicator as the second evaluation indicator; Dividing the standard value into a first standard value and a second standard value based on the standard value type; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation indicator is greater than or equal to the first standard value, the indicator score is the first score; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation index is less than the first standard value, and greater than or equal to the second standard value, the index score is the second score; If the actual value corresponding to the second evaluation index is less than the second standard value, the index score = second score - ⌈ (second standard value - actual value) / first preset parameter ⌉ × second preset parameter, where the first preset parameter and the second preset parameter are pre-set calculation parameters; if the index score is less than 0, 0 is determined as the index score.

6. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The enterprise high-quality development assessment based on the assessment method includes: Acquiring indicator data based on the indicator calculation method; Calculate the actual value of the evaluation index based on the index calculation method and the index data; Determine the dimension value of the key field based on the actual value and the first weight; Building a radar chart based on the dimension values ​​and the key areas; Calculating a development index score based on the development assessment method and the actual value; An assessment of the high-quality development of an enterprise is conducted based on the development index score and the radar chart.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that After calculating the actual value of the evaluation index based on the index calculation method and the index data, the method further includes: Determine warning areas based on the types of key areas mentioned; Determine the evaluation indicator corresponding to the warning field as the warning indicator; Obtaining a warning threshold value of the warning indicator; If the actual value of the warning indicator reaches the corresponding warning threshold, a warning is issued.

8. An enterprise high-quality development evaluation device based on business and financial integration, characterized in that: include: Data acquisition module, used to acquire key fields; An indicator determination module, used to determine the evaluation indicators corresponding to each of the key areas; A method determination module, used to determine an evaluation method based on the key areas and the evaluation indicators, wherein the evaluation method includes a capability evaluation method and a development evaluation method; The development assessment module is used to conduct high-quality development assessment of an enterprise based on the assessment method.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: comprising a processor coupled to a memory; The processor is configured to execute a computer program stored in the memory, so that the electronic device executes the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The method comprises a computer program or an instruction, which, when executed on a computer, causes the computer to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images