Flight operation data management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention provides a flight operation data management method and device, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and relates to the technical field of flight operation data management. The method comprises the following steps: firstly, acquiring airport guarantee plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information; second, first comparative analysis is carried out in the airport guarantee plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information to determine each piece of airport guarantee plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data which meet preset rules; and then, performing second comparative analysis among different data on each piece of airport guarantee plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data, which meet a preset rule, so as to determine whether the different data are matched or not. Based on the above content, the problem of low reliability of flight operation data management in the prior art can be improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of flight operation data management, and in particular to a flight operation data management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] FPLA (Airport Support Plan Information) can now be collected and distributed from airlines to airports through data service platforms, but it is difficult to guarantee the credibility of FPLA from collection to distribution. As a result, there is a problem of relatively low reliability of data management. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of this, the purpose of the present application is to provide a flight operation data management method and device, an electronic device and a storage medium to improve the problem of low reliability of flight operation data management existing in the prior art.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, this application adopts the following technical solutions:

[0005] A flight operation data management method, comprising:

[0006] Acquire airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed, wherein the airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, the flight pre-flight plan information includes a plurality of flight pre-flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes a plurality of flight dynamic data;

[0007] Performing a first comparative analysis on the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively, so as to determine each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets a preset rule;

[0008] A second comparative analysis is performed on each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the different data match, and the corresponding results are stored, wherein the second comparative analysis includes matching analysis of the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis of the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data.

[0009] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, the step of performing a first comparative analysis within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules includes:

[0010] Performing comparative analysis of basic elements in the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamics information, respectively, to determine each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamics data that meets the first preset sub-rule, wherein each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamics data that meets the first preset sub-rule has the basic elements;

[0011] For each of the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information, determining whether it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis of difference elements on the information, and when it is not necessary to perform a comparative analysis of difference elements on the information, taking each piece of data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule and corresponds to the information as data that satisfies the preset rule;

[0012] For each type of information that requires comparative analysis of difference elements, comparative analysis of difference elements is performed within each data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, so as to determine each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, and use the data as the data that satisfies the preset rule, wherein each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule has the difference element.

[0013] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, the step of performing comparative analysis of basic elements in the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the first preset sub-rule includes:

[0014] The airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, which are classified according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of airport support plan sets, and a piece of airport support plan data is determined in each of the airport support plan sets as a piece of airport support plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are the same, and between any two of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are not completely the same, and the basic elements include flight number, planned departure time, planned arrival time, planned departure airport, and planned landing airport;

[0015] Classifying the plurality of flight pre-flight plan data included in the flight pre-flight plan information according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of flight pre-flight plan sets, and determining a piece of flight pre-flight plan data in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets as a piece of flight pre-flight plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are the same, and between any two flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are not completely the same;

[0016] The plurality of flight dynamic data included in the flight dynamic information are classified according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of flight dynamic sets, and a piece of flight dynamic data is determined in each of the flight dynamic sets as a piece of flight dynamic data satisfying a first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of flight dynamic data are the same, and between any two of the flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of flight dynamic data are not completely the same.

[0017] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, for each type of information that needs to be compared and analyzed for difference elements, a comparison and analysis of difference elements is performed inside each data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule corresponding to the information to determine each data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, and the step of using the data as data that satisfies the preset rule includes:

[0018] For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, determine whether the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information, and if the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information, determine the airport support plan data as airport support plan data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and use the airport support plan data as airport support plan data satisfying the preset rule;

[0019] For each flight advance flight plan data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, determining whether the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, and if the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, determining the flight advance flight plan data as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and using the flight advance flight plan data as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rule;

[0020] For each piece of flight dynamics data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, it is determined whether the flight dynamics data contains an aircraft registration number, and when the flight dynamics data contains the aircraft registration number, the flight dynamics data is determined to be flight dynamics data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and the flight dynamics data is used as the flight dynamics data satisfying the preset rule.

[0021] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, the step of performing a second comparative analysis between different data of each airport support plan data, each flight advance flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the different data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, includes:

[0022] Performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules and each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight advance flight plan data match each other, and storing the corresponding results;

[0023] A second comparative analysis is performed on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and the corresponding results are stored.

[0024] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, the step of performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules and each piece of flight pre-flight plan data satisfying the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, includes:

[0025] Compare and analyze each airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each flight advance flight plan data that meets the preset rules according to basic elements;

[0026] For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight advance flight plan data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as lack of flight advance flight plan data, and the result is stored;

[0027] For each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, if there is a piece of flight pre-flight plan data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules, the airport support plan data is compared with the flight pre-flight plan data for each other element other than the basic elements, and if there are different other elements, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as a mismatch of the corresponding other elements, and the result is stored.

[0028] In a preferred embodiment of the present application, in the above-mentioned flight operation data management method, the step of performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, includes:

[0029] Compare and analyze each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules according to basic elements;

[0030] For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data among each piece of flight dynamic data satisfying the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as missing flight dynamic data, and the result is stored;

[0031] For each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of airport support plan data having the same basic elements as the flight dynamic data among each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, the result corresponding to the flight dynamic data is determined as missing airport support plan data, and the result is stored;

[0032] For each target data combination, determine whether the data status of the flight dynamic data in the target data combination is non-actual flight, and when it is non-actual flight, determine whether the airport support plan data in the target data combination is cancelled, and, when it is not cancelled, obtain the airport support plan data that follows the airport support plan data, and determine whether the subsequent airport support plan data has time adjustment information, and, when there is no time adjustment information, determine the result corresponding to the flight dynamic information as lack of airport support plan data, and store the result, wherein each of the target data combinations includes one piece of airport support plan data and one piece of flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data.

[0033] The present application also provides a flight operation data management device, comprising:

[0034] A flight operation data acquisition module, used to acquire airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed, wherein the airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, the flight pre-flight plan information includes a plurality of flight pre-flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes a plurality of flight dynamic data;

[0035] A first comparison and analysis module, used to perform a first comparison and analysis within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information, respectively, to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets a preset rule;

[0036] The second comparison and analysis module is used to perform a second comparison and analysis between different data of each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules to determine whether the different data match, and store the corresponding results, wherein the second comparison and analysis includes matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data.

[0037] Based on the above, the present application also provides an electronic device, including:

[0038] Memory for storing computer programs;

[0039] The processor connected to the memory is used to execute the computer program stored in the memory to implement the above-mentioned flight operation data management method.

[0040] Based on the above, the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is run, each step of the above-mentioned flight operation data management method is executed.

[0041] The flight operation data management method and device, electronic device and storage medium provided by the present application first obtain airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information; secondly, perform a first comparative analysis within the airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information respectively to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules; then, perform a second comparative analysis between different data for each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules to determine whether the different data match. Based on the above content, since the acquired information will be subjected to a two-level comparative analysis including a first comparative analysis and a second comparative analysis, the reliability of the comparative analysis is higher, and therefore, the problem of low reliability of flight operation data management existing in the prior art can be improved. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present application more obvious and easy to understand, preferred embodiments are specifically cited below and described in detail with reference to the attached drawings.

[0043] Figure 1 A structural block diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0044] Figure 2 A flowchart of a flight operation data management method provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0045] Figure 3 A block diagram of a flight operation data management device provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical solution in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the present application described and shown in the drawings here can be arranged and designed in various different configurations.

[0047] Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present application provided in the accompanying drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the present application for which protection is sought, but merely represents selected embodiments of the present application. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present application.

[0048] like Figure 1 As shown, an embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, wherein the electronic device may include a memory, a processor, and a flight operation data management device.

[0049] In detail, the memory and the processor are electrically connected directly or indirectly to achieve data transmission or interaction. For example, the memory and the processor can be electrically connected through one or more communication buses or signal lines. The flight operation data management device includes at least one software function module stored in the memory in the form of software or firmware. The processor is used to execute an executable computer program stored in the memory, for example, the software function modules and computer programs included in the flight operation data management device, so as to implement the flight operation data management method provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0050] Optionally, the memory can be, but is not limited to, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable read-only memory (Electric Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, EEPROM), etc.

[0051] Furthermore, the processor may be a general-purpose processor, including a central processing unit (CPU), a network processor (NP), a system on chip (SoC), etc.; it may also be a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components.

[0052] Understandably, Figure 1 The structure shown is for illustration only, and the electronic device may also include Figure 1 More or fewer components as shown, or with Figure 1 The different configurations shown, for example, may also include a communication unit for exchanging information with other devices.

[0053] Combination Figure 2 The present application also provides a flight operation data management method applicable to the above electronic device, wherein the method steps defined in the process related to the flight operation data management method can be implemented by the electronic device.

[0054] The following will Figure 2 The specific process shown is explained in detail.

[0055] Step S110, obtaining airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed.

[0056] In an embodiment of the present application, the electronic device can obtain airport support plan information (FPLA), flight advance flight plan information (FLSC) and flight dynamic information (FODC) to be processed. The airport support plan information includes multiple airport support plan data, the flight advance flight plan information includes multiple flight advance flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes multiple flight dynamic data. For example, under normal circumstances, each flight will form a corresponding airport support plan data, a flight advance flight plan data and a flight dynamic data.

[0057] Step S120, performing a first comparative analysis on the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively, to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules.

[0058] In an embodiment of the present application, after acquiring the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information, the electronic device can respectively perform a first comparative analysis within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data, and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules. In other words, the multiple airport support plan data can be compared and analyzed to determine the airport support plan data that meets the preset rules; the multiple flight pre-flight plan data can also be compared and analyzed to determine the flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules; the multiple flight dynamic data can also be compared and analyzed to determine the flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules.

[0059] Step S130, a second comparative analysis is performed on each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight advance flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the different data match each other, and the corresponding results are stored.

[0060] In an embodiment of the present application, after determining each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules, the electronic device can perform a second comparative analysis between different data for each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules to determine whether the different data match, and store the corresponding results. The second comparative analysis includes matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data, that is, performing at least one of the two matching analyses.

[0061] Based on the above content, since the acquired information is subjected to a two-level comparative analysis including a first comparative analysis and a second comparative analysis, the reliability of the comparative analysis is higher, thereby improving the problem of low reliability of flight operation data management existing in the prior art.

[0062] It should be noted that for step S120 , the specific method of performing the first comparative analysis within each information is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs.

[0063] For example, in an alternative embodiment, in order to ensure the reliability of the first comparative analysis within each information and make the reliability of the screened data higher, the above-mentioned step S120 can further include step S121, step S122 and step S123, and the content of each step is as follows.

[0064] Step S121, performing comparative analysis of basic elements within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information, respectively, to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the first preset sub-rule.

[0065] In the embodiment of the present application, the basic elements can be compared and analyzed inside the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively, so as to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the first preset sub-rule. Among them, each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the first preset sub-rule has the basic elements. In other words, since the basic elements are the basic information possessed by each type of data, each data can be compared and analyzed based on the basic elements first.

[0066] Step S122, for each of the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information, determine whether it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis of the difference elements of the information, and when it is not necessary to perform a comparative analysis of the difference elements of the information, each piece of data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule is regarded as data that satisfies the preset rule.

[0067] In the embodiment of the present application, for each of the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information, it is determined whether it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis of the difference elements of the information, and when it is not necessary to perform a comparative analysis of the difference elements of the information, each piece of data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule is used as data that satisfies the preset rule. For example, each type of information needs to be compared and analyzed for the difference elements. It should be noted that the difference elements refer to elements other than the basic elements, and not all types of information have the elements, such as the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data have an element, while the flight dynamic data does not have this element.

[0068] Step S123, for each type of information that needs to be compared and analyzed for difference elements, a comparison and analysis of difference elements is performed within each data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, so as to determine each data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, and use the data as data that satisfies the preset rule.

[0069] In the embodiment of the present application, for each type of information that needs to be compared and analyzed for difference elements, a comparison and analysis of difference elements is performed within each data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, so as to determine each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, and the data is used as data that satisfies the preset rule. Among them, each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule has the difference element, and it should be noted that the difference elements corresponding to different types of information may be different.

[0070] It can be understood that in the above step S121, the specific method of performing comparative analysis of basic elements is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs. For example, in an alternative implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of each airport support plan data, each flight advance flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that are determined to meet the first preset sub-rule, the above step S121 can further include the following specific implementation content:

[0071] First, the airport support plan information including multiple airport support plan data may be classified according to basic elements to obtain multiple airport support plan sets, and one piece of airport support plan data may be determined in each of the airport support plan sets (for example, one piece of airport support plan data with the latest update time may be screened out) as one piece of airport support plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are the same (provided that there are more than two pieces of airport support plan data, for example, since a plan of the same flight may be updated multiple times, there may be multiple pieces of airport support plan data), and between any two of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are not completely the same (that is, they belong to different flights), and the basic elements include flight number, planned departure time, planned arrival time, planned departure airport, and planned landing airport;

[0072] Secondly, the multiple flight pre-flight plan data included in the flight pre-flight plan information may be classified according to basic elements to obtain multiple flight pre-flight plan sets, and one flight pre-flight plan data is determined in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets (for example, a flight pre-flight plan data with the latest update time may be screened out) as a flight pre-flight plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are the same (provided that there are more than two flight pre-flight plan data, for example, since a plan of the same flight may be updated multiple times, there may be multiple flight pre-flight plan data), and between any two flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are not completely the same;

[0073] Then, the multiple flight dynamic data included in the flight dynamic information may be classified according to basic elements to obtain multiple flight dynamic sets, and a piece of flight dynamic data may be determined in each of the flight dynamic sets (for example, a piece of flight dynamic data with the latest update time may be screened out) as a piece of flight dynamic data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two flight dynamic data are the same (provided that there are more than two flight dynamic data, for example, since a plan of the same flight may be updated multiple times, there are multiple flight dynamic data), and between any two flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two flight dynamic data are not completely the same.

[0074] It can be understood that, in the above step S123, the specific method of performing comparative analysis of the difference elements is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs. For example, in an alternative implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, the above step S123 can further include the following specific implementation contents:

[0075] First, for each piece of airport support plan data that meets the first preset sub-rule, it can be determined whether the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information. If the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information, the airport support plan data is determined as airport support plan data that meets the second preset sub-rule, and the airport support plan data is used as airport support plan data that meets the preset rule; that is, the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information can be used as difference elements that need to be compared and analyzed in the airport support plan data;

[0076] Secondly, for each flight advance flight plan data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, it can be determined whether the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, and when the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, the flight advance flight plan data is determined as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and the flight advance flight plan data is used as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rule; that is, the passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information can be used as difference elements that need to be compared and analyzed in the flight advance flight plan data;

[0077] Then, for each piece of flight dynamic data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, it is determined whether the flight dynamic data contains an aircraft registration number, and when the flight dynamic data contains an aircraft registration number, the flight dynamic data is determined as flight dynamic data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and the flight dynamic data is used as flight dynamic data satisfying the preset rule; that is, the aircraft registration number can be used as a difference element that needs to be compared and analyzed for the flight dynamic data.

[0078] It should be noted that for step S130 , the specific method of performing the second comparative analysis between different data is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs.

[0079] For example, in an alternative implementation, in order to ensure the comprehensiveness of the second comparative analysis and make the stored comparative analysis results have higher application value, the above-mentioned step S130 may further include step S131 and step S132, and the specific content of each step is as follows.

[0080] Step S131, performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data match each other, and storing the corresponding results.

[0081] In an embodiment of the present application, in the first aspect, each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules can be subjected to a second comparative analysis to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data match each other, and the corresponding results can be stored.

[0082] Step S132, performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and storing the corresponding results.

[0083] In an embodiment of the present application, in the second aspect, a second comparative analysis can be performed on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and the corresponding results are stored.

[0084] It is understandable that, in the above step S131, the specific manner of performing the second comparative analysis on the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs. For example, in an alternative implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of the second comparative analysis, the above step S131 can further include the following contents:

[0085] Firstly, each airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each flight advance flight plan data that meets the preset rules can be compared and analyzed according to the basic elements;

[0086] Secondly, for each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight advance flight plan data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as lack of flight advance flight plan data, and the result is stored;

[0087] Then, for each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, if there is a piece of flight pre-flight plan data with the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules, the airport support plan data will be compared with the flight pre-flight plan data for each other element other than the basic elements (the specific elements that need to be matched can be selected according to actual needs and are not specifically limited here), and if there are different other elements, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data will be determined as the corresponding other elements do not match, and the result will be stored.

[0088] It is understandable that, in the above step S132, the specific manner of performing the second comparative analysis on the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data is not limited and can be selected according to actual needs. For example, in an alternative implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of the second comparative analysis, the above step S132 can further include the following contents:

[0089] First, each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules can be compared and analyzed according to basic elements;

[0090] Secondly, for each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data among each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as missing flight dynamic data, and the result is stored;

[0091] Then, for each piece of flight dynamic data satisfying the preset rule, if there is no at least one piece of airport support plan data having the same basic elements as the flight dynamic data among each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rule, the result corresponding to the flight dynamic data is determined as missing airport support plan data, and the result is stored;

[0092] In addition, for each target data combination, it is determined whether the data status of the flight dynamic data in the target data combination is non-actual flight, and when it is non-actual flight, it is determined whether the airport support plan data in the target data combination is cancelled (when cancelled, the result can be that the included airport support plan data matches the flight dynamic data), and, when it is not cancelled, the airport support plan data after the airport support plan data is obtained, and it is determined whether the subsequent airport support plan data has time adjustment information (that is, whether the flight is delayed), and, when there is no time adjustment information (that is, the flight is not delayed, when the flight is delayed, the corresponding result can be determined as the airport support plan data matches the flight dynamic data), the result corresponding to the flight dynamic information is determined as the lack of airport support plan data, and the result is stored, wherein each of the target data combinations includes an airport support plan data and a flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data; it can be understood that in other implementations, the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data can also be compared and analyzed for other elements to obtain corresponding matching results.

[0093] Combination Figure 3 The present application also provides a flight operation data management device applicable to the above electronic device. The flight operation data management device may include a flight operation data acquisition module, a first comparison and analysis module, and a second comparison and analysis module.

[0094] The flight operation data acquisition module is used to acquire airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed, wherein the airport support plan information includes multiple airport support plan data, the flight pre-flight plan information includes multiple flight pre-flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes multiple flight dynamic data. In the embodiment of the present application, the flight operation data acquisition module can be used to execute Figure 2 As shown in step S110, the relevant contents of the flight operation data acquisition module can refer to the above description of step S110.

[0095] The first comparison and analysis module is used to perform a first comparison and analysis within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information, respectively, to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data, and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules. In the embodiment of the present application, the first comparison and analysis module can be used to perform Figure 2 As shown in step S120, the relevant contents of the first comparison and analysis module can refer to the above description of step S120.

[0096] The second comparison and analysis module is used to perform a second comparison and analysis between different data of each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules, so as to determine whether the different data match, and store the corresponding results, wherein the second comparison and analysis includes matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data. In the embodiment of the present application, the second comparison and analysis module can be used to perform Figure 2 As shown in step S130, the relevant contents of the second comparison and analysis module can refer to the above description of step S130.

[0097] In the embodiment of the present application, corresponding to the above-mentioned flight operation data management method applied to the electronic device, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, in which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is run, each step of the flight operation data management method is executed. Among them, each step executed when the aforementioned computer program is run will not be described one by one here, and reference can be made to the above explanation of the flight operation data management method.

[0098] In summary, the flight operation data management method and device, electronic device and storage medium provided by the present application firstly obtain airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information; secondly, perform a first comparative analysis within the airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information respectively to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules; then, perform a second comparative analysis between different data for each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules to determine whether the different data match. Based on the above content, since the acquired information will be subjected to a two-level comparative analysis including a first comparative analysis and a second comparative analysis, the reliability of the comparative analysis is higher, thereby improving the problem of low reliability of flight operation data management existing in the prior art.

[0099] In several embodiments provided in the embodiments of the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed device and method can also be implemented in other ways. The device and method embodiments described above are merely schematic, for example, the flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings show the possible architecture, functions and operations of the device, method and computer program product according to multiple embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, a program segment or a part of a code, and the module, a program segment or a part of a code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in a different order from the order marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two consecutive boxes can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and the combination of boxes in the block diagram and / or flowchart can be implemented with a dedicated hardware-based system that performs a specified function or action, or can be implemented with a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0100] In addition, the functional modules in the various embodiments of the present application may be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module may exist separately, or two or more modules may be integrated to form an independent part.

[0101] If the function is implemented in the form of a software function module and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on such an understanding, the technical solution of the present application is essentially or the part that contributes to the prior art or the part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions to enable a computer device (which can be a personal computer, an electronic device, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present application. The aforementioned storage medium includes: various media that can store program codes, such as a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a disk or an optical disk. It should be noted that, in this article, the term "include", "include" or any other variant thereof is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that the process, method, article or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also includes other elements that are not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such a process, method, article or device. Without more constraints, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a..." does not exclude the existence of other identical elements in the process, method, article or apparatus comprising the element.

[0102] The above description is only the preferred embodiment of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application. For those skilled in the art, the present application may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A flight operation data management method, characterized in that: include: Acquire airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed, wherein the airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, the flight pre-flight plan information includes a plurality of flight pre-flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes a plurality of flight dynamic data; Performing a first comparative analysis on the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively, so as to determine each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets a preset rule; A second comparative analysis is performed on each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the different data match, and the corresponding results are stored, wherein the second comparative analysis includes matching analysis of the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis of the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data.

2. The flight operation data management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of performing a first comparative analysis on the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information respectively to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules includes: Performing comparative analysis of basic elements in the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamics information, respectively, to determine each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamics data that meets the first preset sub-rule, wherein each piece of airport support plan data, each piece of flight pre-flight plan data, and each piece of flight dynamics data that meets the first preset sub-rule has the basic elements; For each of the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information, determining whether it is necessary to perform a comparative analysis of difference elements on the information, and when it is not necessary to perform a comparative analysis of difference elements on the information, taking each piece of data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule and corresponds to the information as data that satisfies the preset rule; For each type of information that requires comparative analysis of difference elements, comparative analysis of difference elements is performed within each data corresponding to the information that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, so as to determine each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule, and use the data as the data that satisfies the preset rule, wherein each piece of data that satisfies the second preset sub-rule has the difference element.

3. The flight operation data management method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of performing comparative analysis of basic elements within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information, and the flight dynamic information to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data, and each flight dynamic data that meets the first preset sub-rule includes: The airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, which are classified according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of airport support plan sets, and a piece of airport support plan data is determined in each of the airport support plan sets as a piece of airport support plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are the same, and between any two of the airport support plan sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of airport support plan data are not completely the same, and the basic elements include flight number, planned departure time, planned arrival time, planned departure airport, and planned landing airport; Classifying the plurality of flight pre-flight plan data included in the flight pre-flight plan information according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of flight pre-flight plan sets, and determining a piece of flight pre-flight plan data in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets as a piece of flight pre-flight plan data that satisfies the first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are the same, and between any two flight pre-flight plan sets, the basic elements corresponding to any two flight pre-flight plan data are not completely the same; The plurality of flight dynamic data included in the flight dynamic information are classified according to basic elements to obtain a plurality of flight dynamic sets, and a piece of flight dynamic data is determined in each of the flight dynamic sets as a piece of flight dynamic data satisfying a first preset sub-rule, wherein in each of the flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of flight dynamic data are the same, and between any two of the flight dynamic sets, basic elements corresponding to any two pieces of flight dynamic data are not completely the same.

4. The flight operation data management method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of performing a comparative analysis of the difference elements within each piece of data satisfying the first preset sub-rule corresponding to the information for each type of information requiring comparative analysis of the difference elements, so as to determine each piece of data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and taking the data as the data satisfying the preset rule, comprises: For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, determine whether the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information, and if the airport support plan data contains the aircraft registration number, passenger and cargo attribute information, and mission nature information, determine the airport support plan data as airport support plan data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and use the airport support plan data as airport support plan data satisfying the preset rule; For each flight advance flight plan data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, determining whether the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, and if the flight advance flight plan data contains passenger and cargo attribute information and mission nature information, determining the flight advance flight plan data as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and using the flight advance flight plan data as flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rule; For each piece of flight dynamics data satisfying the first preset sub-rule, it is determined whether the flight dynamics data contains an aircraft registration number, and when the flight dynamics data contains the aircraft registration number, the flight dynamics data is determined to be flight dynamics data satisfying the second preset sub-rule, and the flight dynamics data is used as the flight dynamics data satisfying the preset rule.

5. The flight operation data management method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The step of performing a second comparative analysis between different data of each airport support plan data, each flight advance flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the different data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, includes: Performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules and each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight advance flight plan data match each other, and storing the corresponding results; A second comparative analysis is performed on each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and the corresponding results are stored.

6. The flight operation data management method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The step of performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules and each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight advance flight plan data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, comprises: Compare and analyze each airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each flight advance flight plan data that meets the preset rules according to basic elements; For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight advance flight plan data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight advance flight plan data satisfying the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as lack of flight advance flight plan data, and the result is stored; For each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, if there is a piece of flight pre-flight plan data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data in each piece of flight pre-flight plan data that meets the preset rules, the airport support plan data is compared with the flight pre-flight plan data for each other element other than the basic elements, and if there are different other elements, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as a mismatch of the corresponding other elements, and the result is stored.

7. The flight operation data management method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The step of performing a second comparative analysis on each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data satisfying the preset rules to determine whether the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data match each other, and storing the corresponding results, comprises: Compare and analyze each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules and each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules according to basic elements; For each piece of airport support plan data satisfying the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data among each piece of flight dynamic data satisfying the preset rules, the result corresponding to the airport support plan data is determined as missing flight dynamic data, and the result is stored; For each piece of flight dynamic data that meets the preset rules, if there is no at least one piece of airport support plan data having the same basic elements as the flight dynamic data among each piece of airport support plan data that meets the preset rules, the result corresponding to the flight dynamic data is determined as missing airport support plan data, and the result is stored; For each target data combination, determine whether the data status of the flight dynamic data in the target data combination is non-actual flight, and when it is non-actual flight, determine whether the airport support plan data in the target data combination is cancelled, and, when it is not cancelled, obtain the airport support plan data that follows the airport support plan data, and determine whether the subsequent airport support plan data has time adjustment information, and, when there is no time adjustment information, determine the result corresponding to the flight dynamic information as lack of airport support plan data, and store the result, wherein each of the target data combinations includes one piece of airport support plan data and one piece of flight dynamic data having the same basic elements as the airport support plan data.

8. A flight operation data management method, characterized in that: include: A flight operation data acquisition module, used to acquire airport support plan information, flight pre-flight plan information and flight dynamic information to be processed, wherein the airport support plan information includes a plurality of airport support plan data, the flight pre-flight plan information includes a plurality of flight pre-flight plan data, and the flight dynamic information includes a plurality of flight dynamic data; A first comparison and analysis module, used to perform a first comparison and analysis within the airport support plan information, the flight pre-flight plan information and the flight dynamic information, respectively, to determine each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meets a preset rule; The second comparison and analysis module is used to perform a second comparison and analysis between different data of each airport support plan data, each flight pre-flight plan data and each flight dynamic data that meet the preset rules to determine whether the different data match, and store the corresponding results, wherein the second comparison and analysis includes matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight pre-flight plan data, and / or matching analysis between the airport support plan data and the flight dynamic data.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: Memory for storing computer programs; A processor connected to the memory is used to execute the computer program stored in the memory to implement the flight operation data management method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed, executes the flight operation data management method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images