Project process control evaluation system

Abstract

The invention relates to a project process control evaluation system which comprises a data center, an index center, a task center and an evaluation center. The data center comprises a project information module, a data acquisition module and a storage module; the index center comprises an index module, a rule module and a judgment module; the task center comprises a scheduling module and a calculation module; the scheduling module is used for sending a calculation instruction to the calculation module after receiving the evaluation task; after receiving a calculation instruction, the calculation module firstly extracts data corresponding to evaluation indexes from data stored in the storage module according to the evaluation indexes recorded by the index module, and then calculates the extracted data according to calculation rules recorded by the rule module to obtain evaluation values of the evaluation indexes; and the evaluation center performs early warning or alarm reminding on each evaluation index according to the evaluation value calculated by the calculation module in combination with the result judgment range of each evaluation index recorded by the judgment module. According to the invention, evaluation indexes and rules can be formulated for project evaluation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of project process control, and in particular to a project process control evaluation system. Background Art

[0002] In the current project process management, the assessment team mainly collects project data from the project team or from various business systems, and manually calculates whether each indicator is qualified according to the rules; or calculates whether a single indicator is qualified through various business systems, and forms the final project assessment results to judge whether the project is running smoothly. However, no matter which of the above methods is used, there are problems such as manual calculation costs, data objectivity, calculation accuracy, and long calculation cycles. Due to the complexity of manual work, the evaluation frequency is low, and it is impossible to feedback project operation problems in a timely manner. Summary of the invention

[0003] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention proposes a project process control evaluation system.

[0004] The specific plan is as follows:

[0005] A project process control and evaluation system includes: a data center, an indicator center, a task center and an evaluation center; wherein:

[0006] The data center includes a project information module, a data acquisition module and a storage module; the project information module is used to record the basic information of the project; the data acquisition module is used to collect the process data of the corresponding project according to the basic information of the project recorded by the project information module; the storage module is used to store the data collected by the data acquisition module according to the set data format;

[0007] The indicator center includes an indicator module, a rule module and a judgment module; the indicator module is used to record the evaluation indicators corresponding to the project; the rule module is used to record the calculation rules of each evaluation indicator; the judgment module is used to record the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator;

[0008] The task center includes a scheduling module and a calculation module; the scheduling module is used to send a calculation instruction to the calculation module after receiving the evaluation task; after receiving the calculation instruction, the calculation module first extracts the data corresponding to the evaluation indicator from the data stored in the storage module according to the evaluation indicator recorded by the indicator module, and then calculates the extracted data according to the calculation rules recorded by the rule module to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator;

[0009] The evaluation center issues early warning or alarm reminders for each evaluation indicator based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation module and the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator recorded by the judgment module.

[0010] Furthermore, the basic information of the project includes a project code and a project name.

[0011] Furthermore, the project process data includes project design data, financial data, procurement data and cost data.

[0012] Furthermore, the indicator module records the contents of the project's evaluation indicators, including the indicator name, indicator meaning, indicator parameters and the department to which the indicator belongs.

[0013] Furthermore, the evaluation center includes an early warning module and an alarm module; the result judgment range includes a normal range, a early warning range and an alarm range; when the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding early warning range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to the project management personnel to make them pay attention to the development trend of the evaluation indicator; when the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding alarm range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to the project management personnel to make them take corresponding measures.

[0014] Furthermore, the scheduling module also includes setting the frequency of the evaluation task and recording the last evaluation time and the evaluation validity period, and automatically generates the evaluation task based on the last evaluation time and the evaluation task frequency, combined with the evaluation validity period.

[0015] The present invention adopts the above technical solution and has the following beneficial effects:

[0016] (1) It provides a data aggregation platform that can aggregate project data from different channels, avoiding problems such as difficulty in use, multiple entries, and data inconsistency caused by data stored in different systems and environments.

[0017] (2) It provides a visual rule definition platform, where users can independently define the calculation parameters, calculation rules, and judgment logic of project control indicators, greatly improving the adaptability and usability of the system and meeting the needs of improving or modifying the enterprise management system at any time.

[0018] (3) It provides a standardized, scientific and comprehensive evaluation method, which can define project evaluation indicators and evaluation standards according to project types, so as to achieve consistency and objectivity of project evaluation standards during the operation period of enterprise projects.

[0019] (4) A rapid assessment system is provided. Through the data center, indicator center, and task center, the assessment value of the project can be calculated according to the assessment indicators and rules formulated by the enterprise, providing the management with forward-looking and timely project status. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] Figure 1 Shown is a schematic diagram of the structure of the system according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0021] To further illustrate various embodiments, the present invention provides drawings. These drawings are part of the disclosure of the present invention, which are mainly used to illustrate the embodiments and can be used in conjunction with the relevant descriptions in the specification to explain the operating principles of the embodiments. With reference to these contents, ordinary technicians in this field should be able to understand other possible implementations and advantages of the present invention.

[0022] The present invention will now be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods.

[0023] The embodiment of the present invention provides a project process control evaluation system, such as Figure 1 As shown, the system includes: a data center, an indicator center, a task center and an evaluation center.

[0024] The data center includes project information module, data acquisition module and storage module, which stores the process data of each engineering project implementation and provides a unified and converged data platform for the company.

[0025] The project information module is used to record basic information of the project. In this embodiment, the basic information of the project includes attributes such as project code and project name. In specific implementation, different projects can be classified according to project types, and the same attributes are set for the same type of projects.

[0026] The data acquisition module is used to collect the process data of the corresponding project according to the basic information of the project recorded by the project information module. In this embodiment, the process data of the project includes project design data, financial data, procurement data and cost data, etc. Different projects can set different process data, which is not limited here. The above process data can be directly obtained from the relevant systems of the corresponding enterprises, such as extracting project-related financial data from the financial sharing system and extracting project procurement data from the supply chain system. If the implementing enterprise does not have a relevant system, it can also automatically generate a data import template based on the parameters involved in the project. After the user manually imports the data according to the template, the storage module is automatically called to store the data.

[0027] The storage module is used to store the data collected by the data collection module according to the set data format. In this embodiment, the data storage needs to be converted according to the set data format (ie, the target format), and the target format is automatically generated according to the system indicator module and the rule module.

[0028] The indicator center includes an indicator module, a rule module and a judgment module. In this embodiment, the indicator center allows users (managers) to define the calculation parameters, calculation rules, judgment logic, etc. of each evaluation indicator in a visual manner.

[0029] The indicator module is used to record the evaluation indicators corresponding to the project. In this embodiment, the indicator module records the evaluation indicators of the project, including the indicator name, indicator meaning, indicator parameters, and the department to which the indicator belongs, etc. In other embodiments, it can also be set as needed. For example, the project design indicator can use the design progress index and the accuracy of the drawing as evaluation indicators to evaluate the current project design status. The parameters of the design progress index can use whether the set of drawings is overdue and the number of days overdue.

[0030] The rule module is used to record the calculation rules of each evaluation indicator, including number sources and formulas, and supports the definition of mixed operations, including but not limited to addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, total, minimum, maximum, average, etc.

[0031] The judgment module is used to record the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator. In this embodiment, the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator is set to include a normal range, a warning range, and an alarm range. The result judgment range can be represented by a fixed value, and it also supports the selection of other indicator parameters. In the process, the actual evaluation value of the indicator parameter is used as the basis for judgment.

[0032] The task center includes a scheduling module and a computing module.

[0033] The scheduling module is used to send a calculation instruction to the calculation module after receiving the evaluation task. In this embodiment, the scheduling module also includes setting the evaluation task frequency and recording the last evaluation time and the evaluation validity period, and automatically generating the evaluation task according to the last evaluation time and the evaluation task frequency, and in combination with the evaluation validity period (generated within the evaluation validity period), so as to execute the evaluation task according to a fixed period. In another embodiment, the evaluation task can be generated manually.

[0034] After receiving the calculation instruction, the calculation module first extracts the data corresponding to the evaluation indicator from the data stored in the storage module according to the evaluation indicator recorded by the indicator module, and then calculates the extracted data according to the calculation rules recorded by the rule module to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator.

[0035] The evaluation center issues early warning or alarm reminders for each evaluation indicator based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation module and the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator recorded by the judgment module. In this embodiment, when the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding early warning range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to project managers (such as project managers, enterprise managers, and managers of various functional calibers, etc.) to make them pay attention to the development trend of the evaluation indicator to avoid further development to project alarms; when the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding alarm range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to project managers to make them take corresponding measures.

[0036] Although the present invention has been specifically shown and described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made to the present invention in form and details without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims, all of which are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A project process control evaluation system, characterized in that: include: Data center, indicator center, task center and evaluation center; among them: The data center includes a project information module, a data acquisition module and a storage module; the project information module is used to record the basic information of the project; the data acquisition module is used to collect the process data of the corresponding project according to the basic information of the project recorded by the project information module; the storage module is used to store the data collected by the data acquisition module according to the set data format; The indicator center includes an indicator module, a rule module and a judgment module; the indicator module is used to record the evaluation indicators corresponding to the project; the rule module is used to record the calculation rules of each evaluation indicator; the judgment module is used to record the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator; The task center includes a scheduling module and a calculation module; the scheduling module is used to send a calculation instruction to the calculation module after receiving the evaluation task; after receiving the calculation instruction, the calculation module first extracts the data corresponding to the evaluation indicator from the data stored in the storage module according to the evaluation indicator recorded by the indicator module, and then calculates the extracted data according to the calculation rules recorded by the rule module to obtain the evaluation value of each evaluation indicator; The evaluation center issues early warning or alarm reminders for each evaluation indicator based on the evaluation value calculated by the calculation module and the result judgment range of each evaluation indicator recorded by the judgment module.

2. The project process control and evaluation system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The basic information of the project includes the project code and project name.

3. The project process control and evaluation system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The process data of the project includes project design data, financial data, procurement data and cost data.

4. The project process control and evaluation system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The indicator module records the evaluation indicators of the project, including the indicator name, indicator meaning, indicator parameters and the department to which the indicator belongs.

5. The project process control and evaluation system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The evaluation center includes an early warning module and an alarm module; the result judgment range includes a normal range, an early warning range, and an alarm range; when the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding early warning range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to the project management personnel to make them pay attention to the development trend of the evaluation indicator; When the evaluation value of a certain evaluation indicator reaches its corresponding alarm range, the early warning module pushes the evaluation indicator to the project management personnel to enable them to take corresponding measures.

6. The project process control and evaluation system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The scheduling module also includes setting the frequency of evaluation tasks and recording the last evaluation time and the evaluation validity period, and automatically generating evaluation tasks based on the last evaluation time and the evaluation task frequency, combined with the evaluation validity period.

Images