Evaluation information display method and device and electronic equipment

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention discloses an evaluation information display method and device and electronic equipment. A specific embodiment of the method comprises the following steps: for a target goods, obtaining an evaluation information set of the target goods from target goods interaction records of a plurality of entities; based on the evaluation information set, generating evaluation summary information of the target goods; and displaying at least part of the evaluation summary information in the target goods interaction interface. Therefore, the method for displaying the evaluation summary information is provided.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, and an electronic device for displaying evaluation information. Background Art

[0002] With the development of computers, users can use electronic devices to implement various functions. For example, users can watch videos or purchase goods through electronic devices.

[0003] In some scenarios, when users purchase goods on an online platform, they can refer to the evaluation information of users who have already purchased the goods. The evaluation information of goods is generally displayed according to the store. When the number of goods sold by the store is small, the evaluation information of the goods in the store is less, and it is difficult for users to obtain effective reference information based on the evaluation information. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This part of the disclosure is provided to introduce concepts in a brief form, and these concepts will be described in detail in the following detailed implementation part. This part of the disclosure is not intended to identify the key features or essential features of the claimed technical solution, nor is it intended to limit the scope of the claimed technical solution.

[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an evaluation information display method, which includes: obtaining an evaluation information set of a target good from the target good interaction records of multiple entities for the target good; generating evaluation summary information of the target good based on the evaluation information set; and displaying at least part of the evaluation summary information in a target good interaction interface.

[0006] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an evaluation information display apparatus, including: an obtaining unit, configured to obtain an evaluation information set of a target good from the target good interaction records of multiple entities for the target good; a generating unit, configured to generate evaluation summary information of the target good based on the evaluation information set; and a displaying unit, configured to display at least part of the evaluation summary information in a target good interaction interface.

[0007] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an electronic device, including: one or more processors; a storage device, configured to store one or more programs, and when the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors are caused to implement the evaluation information display method as described in the first aspect.

[0008] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a computer-readable medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, the steps of the evaluation information display method as described in the first aspect are implemented. Brief Description of the Drawings

[0009] In conjunction with the accompanying drawings and with reference to the following specific embodiments, the above and other features, advantages, and aspects of the various embodiments of the present disclosure will become more apparent. Throughout the drawings, the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements. It should be understood that the drawings are schematic and that the original elements and elements are not necessarily drawn to scale.

[0010] Figure 1 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for displaying evaluation information according to the present disclosure;

[0011] Figure 2A 、 Figure 2B 、 Figure 2C 、 Figure 2D 、 Figure 2E and Figure 2F is a schematic diagram of an application scenario of a method for displaying evaluation information according to the present disclosure;

[0012] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of an application scenario of a method for displaying evaluation information according to the present disclosure;

[0013] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an application scenario of a method for displaying evaluation information according to the present disclosure;

[0014] Figure 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for displaying evaluation information according to the present disclosure;

[0015] Figure 6 is an exemplary system architecture to which the method for displaying evaluation information according to an embodiment of the present disclosure can be applied;

[0016] Figure 7 is a schematic diagram of the basic structure of an electronic device provided according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Specific Embodiments

[0017] The embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although some embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure can be implemented in various forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided to more thoroughly and completely understand the present disclosure. It should be understood that the drawings and embodiments of the present disclosure are only for exemplary purposes and are not used to limit the protection scope of the present disclosure.

[0018] It should be understood that the various steps recited in the method embodiments of the present disclosure can be executed in a different order and / or in parallel. In addition, the method embodiments may include additional steps and / or omit the steps shown. The scope of the present disclosure is not limited in this regard.

[0019] As used herein, the term "including" and its variations are open-ended, that is, "including but not limited to". The term "based on" means "at least partially based on". The term "one embodiment" means "at least one embodiment"; the term "another embodiment" means "at least one additional embodiment"; the term "some embodiments" means "at least some embodiments". The relevant definitions of other terms will be given in the following description.

[0020] It should be noted that the concepts such as "first", "second", etc. mentioned in this disclosure are only used to distinguish different devices, modules or units, and are not used to limit the order or interdependence of the functions performed by these devices, modules or units.

[0021] It should be noted that the modifications of "one" and "a plurality of" mentioned in this disclosure are illustrative rather than restrictive. Those skilled in the art should understand that, unless otherwise clearly specified in the context, it should be understood as "one or more".

[0022] The names of the messages or information exchanged between multiple devices in the embodiments of this disclosure are only for illustrative purposes, and are not used to limit the scope of these messages or information.

[0023] Please refer to Figure 1 , which shows the flow of an embodiment of the evaluation information display method according to this disclosure. As Figure 1 shown, the evaluation information display method includes the following steps:

[0024] Step 101, for a target item, obtain a set of evaluation information of the target item from the target item interaction records of multiple entities.

[0025] In this embodiment, the execution subject of the evaluation information display method (such as a server and / or a terminal device) can obtain a set of evaluation information of the target item from the target item interaction records of multiple entities for the target item.

[0026] Here, the target item can be any item. As an example, the target item can be an S-brand shirt. It can be understood that there may be multiple entities selling S-brand shirts on the item trading platform.

[0027] As an example, the entity can be a store, a merchant, etc. The target item interaction record of the entity can be the interaction record generated during the process of selling the target item; multiple entities can correspond to the providers of the same or the same model of item (i.e., the target item). For example, after a user purchases the target item, the user comments on the target item. It can be understood that the comments made by the user may involve the item itself of the target item or the purchase process of the target item.

[0028] Step 102: Generate evaluation summary information for the target product based on the evaluation information set.

[0029] Here, the evaluation summary information for the target product can be generated based on the comment information set (interaction records of the target product from multiple entities).

[0030] Here, the evaluation summary information for the target product can be a summary generated for all or part of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set.

[0031] Here, the form and display method of the evaluation summary information can be set according to the actual application scenario and are not limited here.

[0032] Optionally, the evaluation summary information can include sentence-based summary information.

[0033] Optionally, the evaluation summary information can include keyword-based summary information.

[0034] Optionally, the sentence-based summary information and the keyword-based summary information can be displayed side by side.

[0035] Optionally, the keyword-based summary information can be integrated into the sentence-based summary information and the two are displayed in combination.

[0036] Step 103: Display at least part of the evaluation summary information in the target product interaction interface.

[0037] Here, part or all of the evaluation summary information can be displayed in the target product interaction interface (such as the product page) of one or more entities (such as a store on a trading platform).

[0038] It should be noted that the evaluation information display method provided in this embodiment can obtain the comment information of the user on the target product from the interaction records of the target product of multiple entities as the evaluation information set for the target product; then, the evaluation information in the evaluation information set can be summarized to generate evaluation summary information; and all or part of the evaluation summary information is displayed in the target product interaction interface. Thus, relatively accurate evaluation information can be generated for the target product based on the comment information generated during the interaction of the target product with multiple entities, and high-accuracy reference information can be provided to the user.

[0039] It should be noted that for the case where there is less evaluation information of the target product in a single store, the evaluation summary information summarized based on the evaluation information of multiple entities can efficiently supplement the information and enhance the user's understanding of the product.

[0040] As an example, please refer to Figure 2A , Figure 2AShows a target product interaction interface, which can be the details page of the target product, X shirt, sold by Store A (an online sales store). In area 201, after-sales evaluation information of the X shirt sold in Store A can be displayed. In area 202, evaluation summary information of the same product (i.e., X shirt) can be displayed; in area 203, evaluation summary information can be displayed, and the evaluation summary information includes an evaluation summary statement, and the evaluation summary statement can incorporate evaluation summary keywords (underlined).

[0041] In some embodiments, the method further includes: in the target product interaction interface, displaying an expansion control; in response to a trigger operation on the expansion control, displaying the generated evaluation summary information and the evaluation information in the evaluation information set.

[0042] Here, the generated evaluation summary information can be all the evaluation summary information.

[0043] Here, the evaluation information in the evaluation information set can be the evaluation information provided by the user, that is, specific evaluation information.

[0044] As an example, please refer to Figure 2B and Figure 2D , in Figure 2B triggering the expansion control 204, an interface as shown in Figure 2D can be displayed (including evaluation summary keywords and specific evaluation information).

[0045] As an example, please refer to Figure 2E and Figure 2F , in Figure 2E triggering the expansion control 204, an interface as shown in Figure 2F can be displayed (including evaluation summary statements and specific evaluation information).

[0046] Thus, the comprehensiveness of the displayed evaluation-related information can be improved, providing a comprehensive reference for users.

[0047] In some embodiments, the evaluation summary information includes evaluation summary keywords, and the evaluation summary keywords include target evaluation dimensions and corresponding summary viewpoints.

[0048] Here, the number of evaluation summary keywords of the target product can be one or more.

[0049] Here, the evaluation summary keywords can include target evaluation dimensions, for example, quality, color, comfort, etc.

[0050] Here, the evaluation summary keywords can include summary viewpoints corresponding to the evaluation dimensions, for example, quality (evaluation dimension) is good (summary viewpoint), color (evaluation dimension) is very correct (summary viewpoint).

[0051] Thus, the evaluation summary information can be presented in the form of keywords, improving the conciseness of the summary information.

[0052] In some embodiments, step 102 may include: determining a target evaluation dimension of a target item based on an evaluation information set; aggregating keyword originals based on the target evaluation dimension to obtain an aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension; and summarizing view information from the aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension to obtain a summary view corresponding to the target evaluation dimension.

[0053] Here, the aggregation result includes keyword originals matching the target evaluation dimension.

[0054] As an example, the target evaluation dimensions determined based on the evaluation information set include fabric and workmanship. Based on the evaluation dimension of fabric, keyword originals matching the fabric (the keyword originals are the originals in the evaluation information set) can be aggregated to obtain a first aggregation result, and keyword originals matching the workmanship can be aggregated to obtain a second aggregation result. From the first aggregation result, summary views matching the fabric are obtained, such as good, very good, not bad, etc. Thus, an evaluation summary keyword of "good fabric" is obtained. From the second aggregation result, summary views matching the workmanship are obtained, such as fine, meticulous, good, etc. Thus, an evaluation summary keyword of "fine workmanship" is obtained.

[0055] Thus, by first determining the target evaluation dimension and then aggregating relevant keyword originals, the comprehensiveness of finding keyword originals matching the target evaluation dimension is improved, thereby improving the accuracy of the determined summary views and the accuracy rate of the review keywords.

[0056] In some embodiments, determining a target evaluation dimension of a target item from the evaluation information based on the evaluation information set includes: extracting keyword originals from the evaluation information in the evaluation information set; and selecting a target evaluation dimension from multiple evaluation dimensions corresponding to the evaluation information set.

[0057] Here, the keyword originals include an evaluation dimension and corresponding view information.

[0058] As an example, the evaluation information in the evaluation information set may include keyword originals. For example, the evaluation information is "This piece of clothing has good quality and fast logistics"; "good quality" can be a keyword original, and "fast logistics" can be a keyword original.

[0059] Here, if there are multiple pieces of evaluation information in the evaluation information set, the evaluation information set can reflect multiple evaluation dimensions. Some of these evaluation dimensions can be selected as the target evaluation dimensions.

[0060] As an example, the quality in "good quality" can be selected as the evaluation dimension.

[0061] Optionally, the basis for selecting the target evaluation dimension can be determined according to a preset dimension selection rule; for example, it can be determined whether to select this dimension as the target evaluation dimension based on whether it is in the target dimension blacklist, or based on the number of comment messages for this dimension.

[0062] Thus, a more representative and general evaluation dimension can be determined, and evaluation summary keywords can be generated, improving the accuracy of the evaluation summary keywords.

[0063] In some implementation manners, reference can be made to Figure 3 the process shown Figure 3 which shows an exemplary process for obtaining evaluation summary keywords.

[0064] Step 301: Extract the original keywords from the evaluation information in the evaluation information set.

[0065] Step 302: Select a target evaluation dimension from the multiple evaluation dimensions corresponding to the evaluation information set.

[0066] Step 303: Aggregate the original keywords based on the target evaluation dimension to obtain an aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension.

[0067] Step 304: Summarize the view information from the aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension to obtain a summary view corresponding to the target evaluation dimension.

[0068] It should be noted that through Figure 3 the evaluation summary keywords generated by the process shown, a more representative and general target evaluation dimension can be determined, and the comprehensiveness of finding the original keywords matching the target evaluation dimension can be improved. Furthermore, the accuracy of the determined summary view can be improved, and the accuracy of the comment keywords can be improved.

[0069] In some embodiments, the method further includes: in response to a trigger operation on the evaluation summary keywords displayed in the target goods interaction interface, displaying the evaluation information matching the evaluation summary keywords.

[0070] As an example, please refer to Figure 2B , Figure 2B which shows the target goods interaction interface for displaying evaluation summary keywords. In Figure 2B , when the evaluation summary keyword 2031 is triggered, the evaluation information matching the evaluation summary keyword 2031 can be displayed (as shown in Figure 2C ).

[0071] Thus, when the user expects to view the specific evaluation information of the target evaluation dimension, the specific evaluation information matching the target evaluation dimension can be displayed in a timely manner, improving the efficiency and accuracy of the user's information acquisition.

[0072] In some embodiments, the evaluation summary information includes an evaluation summary statement.

[0073] In some embodiments, step 102 includes: summarizing at least part of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset statement summarization rule to generate an evaluation summary statement of the target goods.

[0074] Here, the statement summarization rule includes one or more of the following: word count rule, sentence pattern rule, tone rule, address rule, and restricted output content rule.

[0075] As an example, the restricted input content rule can be used to restrict the output of non-general information for the target goods, such as information with a strong association with the store.

[0076] As an example, please refer to Figure 2E , Figure 2E shows the evaluation summary statement 2032. The evaluation summary statement can be a fluent summary statement obtained by summarizing part or all of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set. Triggering Figure 2E the evaluation summary statement 2032 or the expansion control in can display an interface as shown in Figure 2E The interface shown can display the complete evaluation summary statement and related specific evaluation information. Figure 2F The interface shown can display the complete evaluation summary statement and related specific evaluation information.

[0077] Thus, an evaluation summary statement with complete meaning expression, smooth sentences, and meeting the preset summary rules can be generated, improving the readability and accuracy of the evaluation summary information.

[0078] In some embodiments, the summarizing at least part of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset statement summarization rule to generate an evaluation summary statement of the target goods includes: generating a score for the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset evaluation information quality rule; selecting evaluation information from the evaluation information set to display a first subset according to the score of the evaluation information; using the statement summarization rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain an evaluation summary statement.

[0079] Here, the evaluation information quality rule is used to determine the quality of the evaluation information. The evaluation information quality rule includes not only the quality scoring rule of the text itself but also the quality scoring rule adapted to the text in the form of evaluation information.

[0080] In some embodiments, the evaluation information quality rules include one or more of the following sub-rules, but are not limited to: text quality sub-rule; user positive evaluation sub-rule; user scoring sub-rule; evaluation timeliness sub-rule.

[0081] Here, the text quality sub-rule can be used to determine the text quality, such as text fluency, number of words, etc.

[0082] Here, the user positive evaluation sub-rule is used to determine whether the overall evaluation of this target item is positive.

[0083] Here, the user scoring sub-rule is used to quantitatively determine the score given by the user to the target item.

[0084] Here, the evaluation timeliness sub-rule is used to determine whether the evaluation information is still timely (to avoid inaccurate evaluation information due to being too early).

[0085] Thus, the evaluation information can be scored through one or more sub-rules. The evaluation information selected according to the score can ensure high quality, improve the quality of the basic corpus used to generate the evaluation summary statement, and thus ensure the quality of the generated evaluation summary statement.

[0086] In some embodiments, using the statement summary rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain an evaluation summary statement may include: inputting the first subset, the statement summary rule, and the target item information into a summary model to obtain candidate statements output by the summary model; inputting the candidate statements into a verification model to obtain a verification result output by the verification model; in response to the verification result indicating passing, outputting the evaluation summary statement; in response to the verification result indicating not passing, inputting the rewriting requirement information, the reason for not passing, and the candidate statements into the summary model, and the summary model performs a new round of summarization process.

[0087] As an example, please refer to Figure 4 , the item information, the summary rule, and the evaluation information in the first subset can be input into the summary model 401. The summary model 401 can output candidate statements, and the candidate statements can be imported into the verification model 402 to obtain the verification result output by the verification model. The verification model can output a verification conclusion of passing or not passing. If the verification result indicates passing, the evaluation summary information is output. If the verification result indicates not passing, the rewrite request 403 can be input into the summary model 401. The rewrite request can include the rewriting requirement information, the reason for not passing, and the candidate statements input into the summary model, and the summary model performs a new round of summarization process until the verification passes.

[0088] Here, the summary model can be used to summarize text information to obtain summary information. The specific implementation manner of the summary model can be flexibly set according to needs.

[0089] As an example, a summarization model can be adopted. The input of the summarization model includes product information, summarization rules, and several pieces of evaluation information. In the summarization rules, constraints are imposed on the number of words, sentence patterns, tones, expression forms, the address to the user, etc. of the summary, and it is ensured that the output is relatively objective and neutral. The key points of the selected goods need to be classified and summarized to ensure clarity, and important text phrases are highlighted. At the same time, the output of non-universal information such as logistics delivery and merchant customer service is restricted.

[0090] Here, the verification model can output a verification result of non-passing when the candidate statement does not meet the preset verification conditions (for example, text format, restricted content, text length).

[0091] Thus, evaluation summary statements that meet the conditions can be automatically generated, improving the readability and accuracy of the generated evaluation summary statements.

[0092] Further referring to Figure 5 , as an implementation of the methods shown in the above figures, the present disclosure provides an embodiment of an evaluation information display device. This device embodiment corresponds to the method embodiment shown in Figure 1 and can be specifically applied to various electronic devices.

[0093] As shown in Figure 5 , the evaluation information display device of this embodiment includes: an acquisition unit 501, a generation unit 502, and a display unit 503. Among them, the acquisition unit is used to acquire an evaluation information set of the target goods from the target goods interaction records of multiple entities for the target goods; the generation unit is used to generate an evaluation summary information of the target goods based on the evaluation information set; the display unit is used to display at least part of the evaluation summary information in the target goods interaction interface.

[0094] In this embodiment, the specific processing of the acquisition unit 501, the generation unit 502, and the display unit 503 of the evaluation information display device and the technical effects brought by them can respectively refer to the relevant descriptions of step 101, step 102, and step 103 in the corresponding embodiment, which will not be elaborated here. Figure 1

[0095] In some embodiments, the device is further configured to: display an expansion control in the target goods interaction interface; and in response to a trigger operation on the expansion control, display the generated evaluation summary information and the evaluation information in the evaluation information set.

[0096] In some embodiments, the evaluation summary information includes evaluation summary keywords, and the evaluation summary keywords include target evaluation dimensions and corresponding summary viewpoints.

[0097] In some embodiments, generating evaluation summary information of a target item based on an evaluation information set includes: determining a target evaluation dimension of the target item based on the evaluation information set; aggregating original keyword texts based on the target evaluation dimension to obtain an aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension, where the aggregation result includes original keyword texts matching the target evaluation dimension; and summarizing opinion information from the aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension to obtain a summary opinion corresponding to the target evaluation dimension.

[0098] In some embodiments, determining a target evaluation dimension of a target item from the evaluation information in the evaluation information set includes: extracting original keyword texts from the evaluation information in the evaluation information set, where the original keyword texts include an evaluation dimension and corresponding opinion information; and selecting a target evaluation dimension from multiple evaluation dimensions corresponding to the evaluation information set.

[0099] In some embodiments, the apparatus is further configured to: in response to a trigger operation on an evaluation summary keyword displayed in an interaction interface of a target item, display evaluation information matching the evaluation summary keyword.

[0100] In some embodiments, the evaluation summary information includes an evaluation summary statement; and generating evaluation summary information of a target item based on an evaluation information set includes: summarizing at least part of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset statement summarization rule to generate an evaluation summary statement of the target item; where the statement summarization rule includes one or more of the following: a word count rule, a sentence pattern rule, a tone rule, an address rule, and a rule for restricting output content.

[0101] In some embodiments, summarizing at least part of the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset statement summarization rule to generate an evaluation summary statement of the target item includes: generating a score for the evaluation information in the evaluation information set according to a preset evaluation information quality rule; selecting evaluation information from the evaluation information set to display a first subset according to the score of the evaluation information; and using the statement summarization rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain an evaluation summary statement.

[0102] In some embodiments, the evaluation information quality rule includes one or more of the following sub-rules: a text quality sub-rule; a user positive evaluation sub-rule; a user scoring sub-rule; and an evaluation timeliness sub-rule.

[0103] In some embodiments, using the statement summarization rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain an evaluation summary statement includes: inputting the first subset, the statement summarization rule, and the target goods information into a summarization model to obtain candidate statements output by the summarization model; inputting the candidate statements into a verification model to obtain a verification result output by the verification model; in response to the verification result indicating passing, outputting the evaluation summary statement; in response to the verification result indicating not passing, inputting the rewriting requirement information, the reason for not passing, and the candidate statements into the summarization model, and the summarization model performs a new round of summarization process.

[0104] Please refer to Figure 6 , Figure 6 which shows an exemplary system architecture to which the evaluation information display method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure can be applied.

[0105] As Figure 6 shown, the system architecture may include terminal devices 601, 602, 603, a network 604, and a server 605. The network 604 is used to provide a medium for communication links between the terminal devices 601, 602, 603 and the server 605. The network 604 may include various connection types, such as wired, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables, etc.

[0106] The terminal devices 601, 602, 603 can interact with the server 605 through the network 604 to receive or send messages, etc. Various client applications can be installed on the terminal devices 601, 602, 603, such as web browser applications, search applications, and news and information applications. The client applications on the terminal devices 601, 602, 603 can receive user instructions and complete corresponding functions according to the user instructions, such as adding corresponding information to the information according to the user instructions.

[0107] The terminal devices 601, 602, and 603 can be hardware or software. When the terminal devices 601, 602, and 603 are hardware, they can be various electronic devices with a display screen and supporting web browsing, including but not limited to smartphones, tablet computers, e-book readers, MP3 players (Moving Picture Experts Group Audio Layer III), MP4 (Moving Picture Experts Group Audio Layer IV) players, laptop computers, desktop computers, and so on. When the terminal devices 601, 602, and 603 are software, they can be installed in the above-listed electronic devices. It can be implemented as multiple software or software modules (such as software or software modules for providing distributed services), or it can be implemented as a single software or software module. No specific limitation is made here.

[0108] The server 605 can be a server that provides various services. For example, it receives the information acquisition requests sent by the terminal devices 601, 602, and 603, obtains the display information corresponding to the information acquisition requests in various ways according to the information acquisition requests, and sends the relevant data of the display information to the terminal devices 601, 602, and 603.

[0109] It should be noted that the evaluation information display method provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure can be executed by the terminal device. Correspondingly, the evaluation information display device can be set in the terminal devices 601, 602, and 603. In addition, the evaluation information display method provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure can also be executed by the server 605. Correspondingly, the evaluation information display device can be set in the server 605.

[0110] It should be understood that Figure 6 the numbers of the terminal devices, the network, and the server in

[0111] are merely illustrative. According to the implementation needs, there can be any number of terminal devices, networks, and servers. Figure 7 which shows a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device (such as Figure 6 the terminal device or the server in Figure 7The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitations on the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0112] As Figure 7 shown, the electronic device may include a processing device (such as a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.) 701, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 702 or a program loaded from a storage device 708 into a random access memory (RAM) 703. In the RAM 703, various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 700 are also stored. The processing device 701, the ROM 702, and the RAM 703 are connected to each other through a bus 704. An input / output (I / O) interface 705 is also connected to the bus 704.

[0113] Generally, the following devices may be connected to the I / O interface 705: an input device 706 including, for example, a touch screen, a touchpad, a keyboard, a mouse, a camera, a microphone, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, etc.; an output device 707 including, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a speaker, a vibrator, etc.; a storage device 708 including, for example, a magnetic tape, a hard disk, etc.; and a communication device 709. The communication device 709 can allow the electronic device to communicate with other devices wirelessly or wiredly to exchange data. Although Figure 7 an electronic device with various devices is shown, it should be understood that it is not required to implement or have all the shown devices. Instead, more or fewer devices may be implemented or had.

[0114] In particular, according to the embodiments of the present disclosure, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts can be implemented as computer software programs. For example, the embodiments of the present disclosure include a computer program product, which includes a computer program carried on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, and the computer program contains program codes for executing the methods shown in the flowcharts. In such an embodiment, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from the network through the communication device 709, or installed from the storage device 708, or installed from the ROM 702. When the computer program is executed by the processing device 701, the above-mentioned functions defined in the methods of the embodiments of the present disclosure are executed.

[0115] It should be noted that the above-mentioned computer-readable medium in the present disclosure can be a computer-readable signal medium, a computer-readable storage medium, or any combination of the two. The computer-readable storage medium can be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the above. More specific examples of the computer-readable storage medium can include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above. In the present disclosure, the computer-readable storage medium can be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program, and this program can be used by or in combination with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In the present disclosure, the computer-readable signal medium can include a data signal propagated in a baseband or as part of a carrier wave, in which computer-readable program code is carried. Such a propagated data signal can take various forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination of the above. The computer-readable signal medium can also be any computer-readable medium other than the computer-readable storage medium, and this computer-readable signal medium can send, propagate, or transmit a program for use by or in combination with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The program code contained on the computer-readable medium can be transmitted by any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wires, optical cables, RF (radio frequency), etc., or any suitable combination of the above.

[0116] In some embodiments, the client and the server can communicate using any currently known or future-developed network protocol such as HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), and can be interconnected with digital data communication in any form or medium (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include local area networks ("LANs"), wide area networks ("WANs"), the Internet (e.g., the Internet), and end-to-end networks (e.g., ad hoc end-to-end networks), as well as any currently known or future-developed networks.

[0117] The above-mentioned computer-readable medium can be included in the above-mentioned electronic device; or it can exist separately and not be assembled into the electronic device.

[0118] The above computer-readable medium carries one or more programs, which, when executed by the electronic device, cause the electronic device to: obtain an evaluation information set of a target product from the target product interaction records of multiple entities for the target product; generate evaluation summary information of the target product based on the evaluation information set; and display at least part of the evaluation summary information in a target product interaction interface.

[0119] Computer program code for performing the operations of the present disclosure may be written in one or more programming languages or combinations thereof. The programming languages include, but are not limited to, object-oriented programming languages such as Java, Smalltalk, C++, and also include conventional procedural programming languages such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, execute as a stand-alone software package, execute partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or execute entirely on a remote computer or server. In the case of a remote computer, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computer (for example, by connecting through an Internet service provider via the Internet).

[0120] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible architectures, functions, and operations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, a program segment, or a part of code that contains one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the blocks may occur in a different order than marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two consecutive blocks shown may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and the combinations of blocks in the block diagram and / or flowchart, may be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system for performing the specified functions or operations, or may be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0121] The units described in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented in software or in hardware. Among them, the name of the unit does not constitute a limitation on the unit itself in some cases. For example, the generation unit may also be described as "the unit for generating comment summary information".

[0122] The functions described above in this document can be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components. By way of example, and without limitation, the types of hardware logic components that can be used include: Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Application Specific Standard Products (ASSPs), Systems on Chip (SOCs), Complex Programmable Logic Devices (CPLDs), and the like.

[0123] In the context of this disclosure, a machine-readable medium can be a tangible medium that can contain or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. A machine-readable medium can be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium can include, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatus, or devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of a machine-readable storage medium would include an electrical connection based on one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Read-Only Memory (ROM), an Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0124] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure and an illustration of the technical principles applied. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of the disclosure involved in the present disclosure is not limited to the technical solutions formed by the specific combination of the above technical features, and should also cover other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalent features without departing from the above disclosure concept. For example, the technical solutions formed by replacing the above features with (but not limited to) the technical features with similar functions disclosed in the present disclosure.

[0125] In addition, although the operations are depicted in a particular order, this should not be construed as requiring that the operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order. In certain environments, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Similarly, although several specific implementation details are included in the above discussion, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure. Certain features described in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented combinatorially in a single embodiment. Conversely, the various features described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented separately or in any suitable sub-combination in multiple embodiments.

[0126] Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and / or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. On the contrary, the specific features and acts described above are merely example forms of implementing the claims.

Claims

1. An evaluation information display method, characterized in that Including: For a target product, obtain a set of evaluation information of the target product from the target product interaction records of multiple entities; Generate summary evaluation information of the target product based on the set of evaluation information; In the target product interaction interface, display at least part of the summary evaluation information.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein The method further includes: In the target product interaction interface, display an expansion control; In response to a trigger operation on the expansion control, display the generated summary evaluation information and the evaluation information in the set of evaluation information.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The summary evaluation information includes summary evaluation keywords, and the summary evaluation keywords include target evaluation dimensions and corresponding summary viewpoints.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein The generating summary evaluation information of the target product based on the set of evaluation information includes: Based on the set of evaluation information, determine the target evaluation dimensions of the target product; Based on the target evaluation dimensions, aggregate the original keyword texts to obtain an aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension, where the aggregation result includes the original keyword texts matching the target evaluation dimension; From the aggregation result corresponding to the target evaluation dimension, summarize the viewpoint information to obtain a summary viewpoint corresponding to the target evaluation dimension.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein In the evaluation information based on the set of evaluation information, determining the target evaluation dimensions of the target product includes: Extract the original keyword texts from the evaluation information in the set of evaluation information, where the original keyword texts include evaluation dimensions and corresponding viewpoint information; Select the target evaluation dimensions from the multiple evaluation dimensions corresponding to the set of evaluation information.

6. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The method further includes: In response to a trigger operation on the summary evaluation keywords displayed in the target product interaction interface, display the evaluation information matching the summary evaluation keywords.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The summary evaluation information includes summary evaluation statements; Wherein The generating summary evaluation information of the target product based on the set of evaluation information includes: According to a preset statement summarization rule, summarize at least part of the evaluation information in the set of evaluation information to generate summary evaluation statements of the target product; The statement summarization rule includes one or more of the following: word count rule, sentence pattern rule, tone rule, address rule, restricted output content rule.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein The summarizing at least part of the evaluation information in the set of evaluation information according to a preset statement summarization rule to generate summary evaluation statements of the target product includes: Generate a score for the evaluation information in the set of evaluation information according to a preset evaluation information quality rule; Select evaluation information from the set of evaluation information according to the scores of the evaluation information to display a first subset; Use the statement summarization rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain summary evaluation statements.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein The evaluation information quality rule includes one or more of the following sub-rules: Text quality sub-rule; User positive evaluation sub-rule; User scoring sub-rule; Evaluation timeliness sub-rule.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein The using the statement summarization rule to summarize the evaluation information in the first subset to obtain summary evaluation statements includes: Input the first subset, the statement summarization rule, and the target product information into a summarization model to obtain candidate statements output by the summarization model; Input the candidate statements into a verification model to obtain a verification result output by the verification model; Output an evaluation summary statement in response to the verification result indicating passing; In response to the verification result indicating failure, input the rewriting requirement information, the reason for failure, and the candidate statement into the summary model, and let the summary model perform a new round of summary process.

11. An evaluation information display device, characterized in that, Including: An acquisition unit for acquiring a set of evaluation information of the target goods from the target goods interaction records of multiple entities for the target goods; A generation unit for generating evaluation summary information of the target goods based on the set of evaluation information; A display unit for displaying at least part of the evaluation summary information in the target goods interaction interface.

12. An electronic device, characterized in that, Including: One or more processors; A storage device for storing one or more programs, When the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the method according to any one of claims 1-0.

13. A computer-readable medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the program is executed by the processor, it implements the method according to any one of claims 1-10.

Images