Evaluation method for applicability of chopper disc and cigarette making machine

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating the applicability of a chopper disc and a cigarette making machine, and the method comprises the steps: determining the evaluation indexes of the applicability of the chopper disc and the cigarette making machine, and the evaluation indexes comprise at least one of a loose end rejection rate index, a weight standard deviation index, a draw resistance standard deviation index and a shutdown index; calculating a quantitative score of each evaluation index; determining the function relationship between the applicability between the chopper disc and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index; according to the function relation and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the chopper disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated, and an evaluation result is obtained. According to the method for evaluating the applicability of the chopper disc and the cigarette making machine, a scientific evaluation method is provided for the applicability of the chopper disc and the cigarette making machine, and a cigarette enterprise is guided to select a proper chopper disc for production in the production and manufacturing process; the equipment operation efficiency is improved, the cigarette loose end removal rate is reduced, the cigarette weight standard deviation is reduced, the cigarette suction resistance standard deviation is reduced, and factors restricting the improvement of the production and manufacturing level are found in time.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of cigarette component evaluation, and more particularly to a method for evaluating the applicability of a chopper disc and a cigarette making machine. Background Art

[0002] At present, there is no relevant evaluation method for the applicability of splitting discs and cigarette making machines, no relevant control targets for the applicability of splitting discs and cigarette making machines, no corresponding evaluation indicators for the impact of splitting discs on the empty end rejection rate, weight deviation, and draw resistance deviation of cigarettes, no relevant scientific evaluation methods, and no relevant research in this regard.

[0003] Therefore, there is an urgent need for an evaluation method for the applicability of splitting discs and cigarette making machines. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the applicability of a chopper disc to a cigarette making machine, so as to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art and to provide a scientific evaluation method for the applicability of a chopper disc to a cigarette making machine.

[0005] The present invention provides a method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine, which includes:

[0006] Determining an evaluation index for the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of a short end rejection rate index, a weight deviation index, a draw resistance deviation index, and a shutdown index;

[0007] Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator;

[0008] Determining the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators;

[0009] According to the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result.

[0010] The above-mentioned evaluation method for the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, wherein, preferably, the cigarette making machine includes: a cigarette making machine of model ZJ118;

[0011] The empty end rejection rate indicator includes: the empty end rejection rate of cigarettes in the cigarette making machine within a production shift;

[0012] The weight deviation index includes the weight deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine within a production shift measured on the comprehensive test bench;

[0013] The draw resistance deviation index includes the draw resistance deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine in a production shift measured on the comprehensive test bench;

[0014] The downtime index includes the number of downtimes caused by the splitting cutter head within a production shift.

[0015] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the suitability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, preferably, the calculation of the quantitative score of each evaluation index includes:

[0016] Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator;

[0017] According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

[0018] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the short rejection rate index includes:

[0019] The full score of the short-end rejection rate indicator is 100 points. When the short-end rejection rate of the cigarette making machine is less than or equal to 0.1% in a production shift, no points will be deducted. When the short-end rejection rate is greater than 0.1%, 2 points will be deducted for every 0.01% increase. The short-end rejection rate indicator score is expressed by the following formula:

[0020] Short elimination rate indicator score = 100-(short elimination rate-0.1) / 0.01%*2.

[0021] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the weight deviation index includes:

[0022] The full score of the weight deviation index is 100 points. Within a production shift, if the weight deviation index is less than or equal to 21g, no points will be deducted. If the weight deviation index is greater than 21g, 5 points will be deducted for each additional 1g. The weight deviation index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0023] Weight deviation index score = 100-(weight deviation-21)*5.

[0024] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the draw resistance deviation index includes:

[0025] The full score of the absorption resistance deviation index is 100 points. Within a production shift, if the absorption resistance deviation index is less than or equal to 42Pa, no points will be deducted. If it is greater than 42Pa, 2 points will be deducted for every increase of 1Pa. The absorption resistance deviation index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0026] The score of the standard deviation of the absorption resistance index = 100-(standard deviation of the absorption resistance-42)*2.

[0027] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the suitability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative calculation formula of the shutdown index includes:

[0028] The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc does not exceed 3 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 3 times, 3 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0029] The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc-3)*3.

[0030] In the above-mentioned evaluation method for the suitability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, preferably, the quantitative score of each evaluation index is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula, including:

[0031] After the splitting disc is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation index is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation index.

[0032] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, preferably, the determining of the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators includes:

[0033] Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula:

[0034] Total applicability score = short rejection rate index score * 30% + weight deviation index score * 30% + suction resistance deviation index score * 20% + shutdown index score * 20%.

[0035] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine, preferably, the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation result, including:

[0036] Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, which is used to reflect the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine;

[0037] According to the total applicability score, the applicability of the splitting knife disc to the cigarette making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result includes whether the splitting knife disc is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the splitting knife disc is suitable for the cigarette making machine.

[0038] The applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, including:

[0039] If the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is not suitable for cigarette making machines; if the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is suitable for cigarette making machines.

[0040] The present invention provides an evaluation method for the applicability of a chopping knife disk and a cigarette making machine. According to the functional relationship between the applicability between the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result. A scientific evaluation method is provided for the applicability of the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine, which guides cigarette companies to select suitable chopping knife disks for production during the production process, improve equipment operation efficiency, reduce the empty cigarette rejection rate, reduce cigarette weight deviation, reduce cigarette draw resistance deviation, and timely discover factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels, and at the same time carry out targeted upgrades and improvements, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and product quality, and promote high-quality development of cigarette companies. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clear, the present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0042] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] Various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The description of the exemplary embodiments is merely illustrative and is in no way intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or use. The present disclosure can be implemented in many different forms and is not limited to the embodiments described herein. These embodiments are provided to make the present disclosure thorough and complete and to fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement of parts and steps, the composition of materials, numerical expressions, and numerical values ​​set forth in these embodiments should be interpreted as being merely exemplary and not as limiting.

[0044] The terms "first," "second," and similar terms used in this disclosure do not indicate any order, quantity, or importance, but are simply used to distinguish different parts. Terms such as "include" or "comprising" mean that the elements preceding the term include the elements listed after the term, and do not exclude the possibility of also including other elements. Terms such as "upper," "lower," and the like are only used to indicate relative positional relationships. When the absolute position of the described object changes, the relative positional relationship may also change accordingly.

[0045] In the present disclosure, when a specific component is described as being located between a first component and a second component, there may or may not be an intervening component between the specific component and the first component or the second component. When a specific component is described as being connected to another component, the specific component may be directly connected to the other component without an intervening component, or may not be directly connected to the other component but have an intervening component.

[0046] All terms (including technical or scientific terms) used in this disclosure have the same meaning as those understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs, unless otherwise specifically defined. It should also be understood that terms defined in, for example, general dictionaries should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant technology, and should not be interpreted in an idealized or highly formal sense, unless explicitly defined herein.

[0047] Technologies, methods, and equipment known to ordinary technicians in the relevant art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, they should be considered part of the specification.

[0048] like Figure 1 As shown, the evaluation method for the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine provided in this embodiment includes the following steps in actual implementation:

[0049] Step S1: Determine evaluation indicators for the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, wherein the evaluation indicators include at least one of an empty end rejection rate indicator, a weight deviation indicator, a draw resistance deviation indicator, and a shutdown indicator.

[0050] The cigarette making machine includes the ZJ118 model. The empty end rejection rate indicator includes the empty end rejection rate of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine within an 8-hour production shift. The weight deviation indicator includes the weight deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine as measured on a comprehensive test bench within an 8-hour production shift. The draw resistance deviation indicator includes the draw resistance deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine as measured on a comprehensive test bench within an 8-hour production shift. The downtime indicator includes the number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc within a production shift.

[0051] Step S2: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator.

[0052] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine of the present invention, step S2 may specifically include:

[0053] Step S21: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation index.

[0054] Specifically, the quantitative calculation formula of the short elimination rate indicator includes:

[0055] The full score of the short-end rejection rate indicator is 100 points. If the short-end rejection rate of the cigarette making machine is less than or equal to 0.1% within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If it is greater than 0.1%, 2 points will be deducted for every 0.01% increase. The short-end rejection rate indicator score is expressed by the following formula:

[0056] Short elimination rate indicator score = 100-(short elimination rate-0.1) / 0.01%*2.

[0057] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the weight deviation index includes:

[0058] The full score of the weight deviation index is 100 points. If the weight deviation index is less than or equal to 21g within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the weight deviation index is greater than 21g, 5 points will be deducted for each additional 1g. The weight deviation index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0059] Weight deviation index score = 100-(weight deviation-21)*5.

[0060] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the absorption resistance deviation index includes:

[0061] The full score of the absorption resistance deviation index is 100 points. If the absorption resistance deviation index is less than or equal to 42Pa within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If it is greater than 42Pa, 2 points will be deducted for every increase of 1Pa. The absorption resistance deviation index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0062] The score of the standard deviation of the absorption resistance index = 100-(standard deviation of the absorption resistance-42)*2.

[0063] Furthermore, the quantitative calculation formula of the downtime index includes:

[0064] The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc does not exceed 3 times within a production shift (8 hours), no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 3 times, 3 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula:

[0065] The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc-3)*3.

[0066] Step S22: Calculate the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula.

[0067] Specifically, after the splitting disc is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation indicator.

[0068] In one embodiment of the present invention, an experiment was conducted on a cigarette making machine. After installing a splitting disc and starting production, the quantitative scores for each evaluation indicator were calculated after the shift. Specifically, the empty stick rejection rate in the empty stick rejection rate indicator was obtained by consulting the empty stick rejection rate recorded by the cigarette making machine's central control unit during an eight-hour production shift. For example, the empty stick rejection rate recorded by the cigarette making machine's central control unit was 0.15%. Therefore, the empty stick rejection rate indicator score = 100 - (0.15% - 0.1%) / 0.01% * 2 = 90 points.

[0069] The weight deviation in the weight deviation index is obtained by consulting the weight deviation of the cigarette making machine recorded during one production shift (8 hours) on the comprehensive test bench. For example, the weight deviation of a cigarette making machine recorded on the comprehensive test bench is 22g. Therefore, the weight deviation index score = 100-(22-21)*5=95 points.

[0070] The draw resistance deviation in the draw resistance deviation index is obtained by consulting the draw resistance deviation of the cigarette making machine recorded during one production shift (8 hours) on the comprehensive test bench. For example, the draw resistance deviation of a cigarette making machine recorded on the comprehensive test bench is 43 Pa. Therefore, the draw resistance deviation index score = 100 - (43 - 42) * 2 = 98 points.

[0071] The number of downtimes in the downtime index is obtained by checking the downtime records of the cigarette making machine within an 8-hour production shift due to the splitting disc. For example, if the number of downtimes due to the splitting disc in the downtime records of a cigarette making machine is 4, the downtime index score = 100 - (4 - 3) * 3 = 97 points.

[0072] Step S3: determining the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators.

[0073] Specifically, based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula:

[0074] Total applicability score = short rejection rate index score * 30% + weight deviation index score * 30% + suction resistance deviation index score * 20% + shutdown index score * 20%.

[0075] Step S4: Evaluate the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index to obtain an evaluation result.

[0076] In one embodiment of the method for evaluating the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine of the present invention, the step S4 may specifically include:

[0077] Step S41: Substitute the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, which is used to reflect the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine.

[0078] In one embodiment of the present invention, the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators calculated in step S2 are substituted into the functional relationship determined in step S3 to obtain the total applicability score. For example, the short rejection rate index score = 90 points, the weight deviation index score = 95 points, the absorption resistance deviation index score = 98 points, and the downtime index score = 97 points.

[0079] The total applicability score = short rejection rate index score (90) * 30% + weight deviation index score (95) * 30% + suction resistance deviation index score (98) * 20% + shutdown index score (97) * 20% = 94.5 points.

[0080] Step S42: Evaluate the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine according to the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result.

[0081] The evaluation results include whether the splitting disc is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the splitting disc is suitable for the cigarette making machine.

[0082] Specifically, if the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is not suitable for cigarette making machines;

[0083] If the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is suitable for cigarette making machines.

[0084] In one embodiment of the present invention, the total applicability score (94.5) calculated in step S41 is greater than 85 points, which means that the splitting disc is determined to be applicable to the cigarette making machine.

[0085] The evaluation method for the applicability of the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine provided in the embodiment of the present invention evaluates the applicability of the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine according to the functional relationship between the applicability between the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, and obtains an evaluation result, thereby providing a scientific evaluation method for the applicability of the chopping knife disk and the cigarette making machine, guiding cigarette companies to select suitable chopping knife disks for production during the production process, improve equipment operation efficiency, reduce the empty cigarette rejection rate, reduce cigarette weight deviation, reduce cigarette draw resistance deviation, and promptly discover factors that restrict the improvement of production and manufacturing levels, and at the same time carry out targeted upgrades and improvements, so that cigarette companies can continuously improve their production and manufacturing capabilities and product quality, and promote high-quality development of cigarette companies.

[0086] So far, the embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail. In order to avoid obscuring the concept of the present disclosure, some details known in the art are not described. Those skilled in the art can fully understand how to implement the technical solutions disclosed herein according to the above description.

[0087] Although some specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail through examples, those skilled in the art should understand that the above examples are only for illustration, not for limiting the scope of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art should understand that the above embodiments can be modified or some technical features can be replaced equivalently without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the suitability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine, characterized in that: include: Determining an evaluation index for the applicability of the splitting disc to the cigarette making machine, the evaluation index comprising at least one of a short end rejection rate index, a weight deviation index, a draw resistance deviation index, and a shutdown index; Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator; Determining the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators; According to the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each evaluation index and the quantitative score of each evaluation index, the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result.

2. The method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The cigarette making machine includes: a cigarette making machine of model ZJ118; The empty end rejection rate indicator includes: the empty end rejection rate of cigarettes in the cigarette making machine within a production shift; The weight deviation index includes the weight deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine within a production shift measured on the comprehensive test bench; The draw resistance deviation index includes the draw resistance deviation of cigarettes produced by the cigarette making machine in a production shift measured on the comprehensive test bench; The downtime index includes the number of downtimes caused by the splitting cutter head within a production shift.

3. The method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator includes: Determine the quantitative calculation formula for each evaluation indicator; According to the quantitative calculation formula, the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator is calculated.

4. The method for evaluating the suitability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the short elimination rate indicator includes: The full score of the short-end rejection rate indicator is 100 points. When the short-end rejection rate of the cigarette making machine is less than or equal to 0.1% in a production shift, no points will be deducted. When the short-end rejection rate is greater than 0.1%, 2 points will be deducted for every 0.01% increase. The short-end rejection rate indicator score is expressed by the following formula: Short elimination rate indicator score = 100-(short elimination rate-0.1) / 0.01%*2.

5. The method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the weight deviation index includes: The full score of the weight deviation index is 100 points. Within a production shift, if the weight deviation index is less than or equal to 21g, no points will be deducted. If the weight deviation index is greater than 21g, 5 points will be deducted for each additional 1g. The weight deviation index score is expressed by the following formula: Weight deviation index score = 100-(weight deviation-21)*5.

6. The method for evaluating the suitability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the absorption resistance standard deviation index includes: The full score of the absorption resistance deviation index is 100 points. Within a production shift, if the absorption resistance deviation index is less than or equal to 42Pa, no points will be deducted. If it is greater than 42Pa, 2 points will be deducted for every increase of 1Pa. The absorption resistance deviation index score is expressed by the following formula: The score of the standard deviation of the absorption resistance index = 100-(standard deviation of the absorption resistance-42)*2.

7. The method for evaluating the suitability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quantitative calculation formula of the shutdown index includes: The full score of the downtime index is 100 points. If the number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc does not exceed 3 times in a production shift, no points will be deducted. If the number of downtimes exceeds 3 times, 3 points will be deducted for each additional time. The downtime index score is expressed by the following formula: The downtime index score = 100-(number of downtimes caused by the splitting disc-3)*3.

8. The method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine according to claim 3, wherein: Calculating the quantitative score of each evaluation indicator according to the quantitative calculation formula includes: After the splitting disc is installed, a production shift is carried out, and a quantitative score of each evaluation index is calculated according to the quantitative calculation formula corresponding to each evaluation index.

9. The method for evaluating the suitability of a splitting disc and a cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The determining of the functional relationship between the applicability between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators includes: Based on the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators, the total applicability score between the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is determined by the following formula: Total applicability score = short rejection rate index score * 30% + weight deviation index score * 30% + suction resistance deviation index score * 20% + shutdown index score * 20%.

10. The method for evaluating the applicability of a splitting disc to a cigarette making machine according to claim 1, characterized in that: The applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the functional relationship between the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and each of the evaluation indicators and the quantitative score of each of the evaluation indicators to obtain an evaluation result, including: Substituting the quantitative scores of the evaluation indicators into the functional relationship between the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine and the evaluation indicators to obtain a total applicability score, which is used to reflect the applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine; According to the total applicability score, the applicability of the splitting knife disc to the cigarette making machine is evaluated to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the evaluation result includes whether the splitting knife disc is not suitable for the cigarette making machine or whether the splitting knife disc is suitable for the cigarette making machine. The applicability of the splitting disc and the cigarette making machine is evaluated based on the total applicability score to obtain an evaluation result, including: If the total applicability score is less than 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is not suitable for cigarette making machines; if the total applicability score is greater than or equal to 85 points, the evaluation result is that the splitting disc is suitable for cigarette making machines.

Images