Method and device for preferably selecting linkage photoelectric rotary table for radar target
By calculating the adaptability score of the photoelectric turntable, the optimal photoelectric turntable is selected as the linkage device for the radar. This solves the problem that the linkage mechanism between the radar and the photoelectric turntable does not comprehensively consider the target characteristics and turntable parameters, and realizes continuous and stable target detection and tracking and accelerated response.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202511415370.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-09-29
- Publication Date
- 2025-11-14
AI Technical Summary
In complex detection scenarios, the linkage mechanism between radar and electro-optical turntable does not comprehensively consider target characteristics and turntable parameters, making it difficult to select the optimal electro-optical turntable to achieve continuous and stable target detection and tracking, resulting in resource waste and response delay.
By acquiring the location and velocity information of radar targets, the adaptability scores of multiple photoelectric turntables are calculated. The photoelectric turntable with the best score is selected as the main linkage device, and the target information is dynamically updated according to the detection information to select the optimal photoelectric turntable for linkage detection.
This technology enables the coordinated operation of radar and multiple optoelectronic turntables, avoiding resource waste, ensuring continuous and stable target detection and tracking, improving response speed and coordination efficiency, and enhancing dynamic target processing capabilities.
Smart Images

Figure CN120949221A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This application relates to the field of radar and optoelectronic equipment collaboration technology, and in particular to a method and apparatus for optimizing the linkage of an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets. Background Technology
[0002] In complex detection scenarios, various sensors such as radar and photoelectric sensors have their own advantages. Multi-sensor collaborative detection can make up for the shortcomings of a single sensor in terms of adaptability to complex environments, coverage, and data modes, and improve the performance of a single sensor in terms of detection and tracking range, accuracy, and data rate.
[0003] In related technologies, since radar has a larger detection range than optoelectronic turntables in controlled areas, radar equipment and optoelectronic turntables are often fixedly bound together and linked one-to-one.
[0004] However, in related technologies, the detection range of a single radar may be covered by multiple optoelectronic turntables, and each turntable has different fields of view, focal length, position, and adjustment efficiency. When constructing a linkage mechanism between radar equipment and multiple optoelectronic turntables, the following problems exist: multiple turntables simultaneously tracking the same target leads to resource waste; targets may be lost due to field of view or distance limitations when moving; and failure to select the turntable with the lowest adjustment cost based on the target's dynamic characteristics (such as speed and trajectory) results in response delays, which urgently need improvement. Summary of the Invention
[0005] This application provides a method and apparatus for optimizing the linkage of a radar target with an optoelectronic turntable, in order to solve the problem in related technologies that the linkage mechanism between radar and optoelectronic turntable does not comprehensively consider the target characteristics and turntable parameters, thus making it difficult to select the optimal optoelectronic turntable to achieve continuous and stable target detection and tracking.
[0006] The first aspect of this application provides a method for selecting a preferred optoelectronic turntable for a radar target, comprising the following steps: acquiring the positioning and velocity information of the radar target, and acquiring multiple static parameters of multiple optoelectronic turntables; calculating a suitability score for each optoelectronic turntable based on the static parameters of each turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target; selecting the optoelectronic turntable with the best score as the main linkage device to perform the corresponding turntable action, and updating the positioning and velocity information of the radar target based on the radar and optoelectronic detection information to dynamically select a new optimal optoelectronic turntable.
[0007] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can evaluate the adaptability of each optoelectronic turntable based on the acquired radar target information and the static parameters of the optoelectronic turntable, and then select the optoelectronic turntable with the highest adaptability as the detection device linked with the radar to detect the target. Furthermore, the target information can be updated based on the detected data, and a new optimal optoelectronic detection turntable can be selected. By integrating radar target information and turntable parameters to select the optimal optoelectronic turntable, the problem of resource waste caused by multiple turntables tracking the same target simultaneously can be effectively solved, and continuous and stable target detection and tracking can be achieved. Updating the target information and selecting a new optimal detection turntable can fully consider the dynamic characteristics of the target, thereby dynamically selecting and adjusting the turntable with the lowest cost and improving the response speed of the linked device.
[0008] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the formula for calculating the adaptability score is: , in, The weights of each factor; For distance factor, Photoelectric turntable Distance to the target; For speed matching factor, For the target speed, Photoelectric turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position; For field of view coverage, For the target location, This is the location of the photoelectric turntable. For the field of view of the photoelectric turntable, For historical stability.
[0009] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the optimal photoelectric turntable as a linkage device with radar to detect the target by constructing an adaptability scoring model for the photoelectric turntable. The scoring model comprehensively considers the characteristics of the target and the parameters of the photoelectric turntable, thereby better realizing the continuous and stable detection and tracking of the target by the photoelectric turntable.
[0010] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the step of selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best matching score based on the matching score of each photoelectric turntable includes: determining a preferred threshold; and selecting the photoelectric turntable with the matching score higher than the preferred threshold as the preferred photoelectric turntable.
[0011] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the optimal photoelectric turntable by "determining the preferred threshold and selecting the photoelectric turntable with the adaptability score higher than the threshold as the preferred photoelectric turntable", thereby improving the adaptability quality, ensuring that the core requirements are met, simplifying the decision-making process, and improving the selection efficiency.
[0012] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the step of selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable further includes: when there are multiple preferred photoelectric turntables, calculating the adjustment time of each preferred photoelectric turntable; and selecting the preferred photoelectric turntable with the shortest adjustment time as the optimal photoelectric turntable and using it as the main linkage device.
[0013] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the device with the shortest adjustment time and fastest response from multiple preferred photoelectric turntables as the main linkage node. The rapid adjustment capability of the linkage device is the key to maintaining the continuity of the task, thereby achieving the technical goal of "accelerated linkage response, optimized collaborative efficiency, and enhanced task continuity", thus effectively improving the efficiency of target detection and enhancing the dynamic target processing capability.
[0014] A second aspect of this application provides an apparatus for optimally linking photoelectric turntables for radar targets, comprising: a loading module for acquiring the positioning and velocity information of the radar target and acquiring multiple static parameters of multiple photoelectric turntables; a calculation module for calculating the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable based on the static parameters of each photoelectric turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target; and a selection module for selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable as the main linkage device to perform the corresponding turntable action, and updating the positioning and velocity information of the radar target based on the radar and photoelectric detection information to dynamically select a new optimal photoelectric turntable.
[0015] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can evaluate the adaptability of each optoelectronic turntable based on the acquired radar target information and optoelectronic turntable configuration parameters, and then select the optoelectronic turntable with the highest adaptability as the detection device linked with the radar to detect the target. Furthermore, the target information can be updated based on the detected data, and a new optimal optoelectronic detection turntable can be dynamically selected. By integrating radar target information and turntable parameters to select the optimal optoelectronic turntable, the resource waste caused by multiple turntables tracking the same target simultaneously can be effectively solved, and continuous and stable target detection and tracking can be achieved. Updating the target information and selecting a new optimal detection turntable can fully consider the dynamic characteristics of the target, thereby dynamically selecting and adjusting the turntable with the lowest cost and improving the response speed of the linked device.
[0016] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the formula for calculating the adaptability score is: , in, The weights of each factor; For distance factor, Photoelectric turntable Distance to the target; For speed matching factor, For the target speed, Photoelectric turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position; For field of view coverage, For the target location, This is the location of the photoelectric turntable. For the field of view of the photoelectric turntable, For historical stability.
[0017] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the optimal photoelectric turntable as a linkage device with radar to detect the target by constructing an adaptability scoring model for the photoelectric turntable. The scoring model comprehensively considers the characteristics of the target and the parameters of the photoelectric turntable, thereby better realizing the continuous and stable detection and tracking of the target by the photoelectric turntable.
[0018] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the selection module includes: a determining unit for determining a preferred threshold; and a first selection unit for selecting the photoelectric turntable with the adaptability score higher than the preferred threshold as the preferred photoelectric turntable.
[0019] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the optimal photoelectric turntable by "determining the preferred threshold and selecting the photoelectric turntable with the adaptability score higher than the threshold as the preferred photoelectric turntable", thereby improving the adaptability quality, ensuring that the core requirements are met, simplifying the decision-making process, and improving the selection efficiency.
[0020] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the selection module further includes: a calculation unit, used to calculate the adjustment time of each preferred photoelectric turntable when there are multiple preferred photoelectric turntables; and a second selection unit, used to select the preferred photoelectric turntable with the shortest adjustment time as the optimal photoelectric turntable and as the main linkage device.
[0021] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the device with the shortest adjustment time and fastest response from multiple optimal photoelectric turntables as the main linkage node. The rapid adjustment capability of the linkage device is the key to maintaining the continuity of the task, thereby achieving the technical goal of "accelerated linkage response, optimized collaborative efficiency, and enhanced task continuity", thus effectively improving the efficiency of target detection and enhancing the dynamic target processing capability.
[0022] A third aspect of this application provides an electronic device, including: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets as described in the above embodiments.
[0023] A fourth aspect of this application provides a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable to a radar target.
[0024] A fifth aspect of this application provides a computer program product that stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable to a radar target.
[0025] Additional aspects and advantages of this application will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of this application. Attached Figure Description
[0026] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of this application will become apparent and readily understood from the following description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for optimally selecting a linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets according to an embodiment of this application; Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a method for selecting a linkage optoelectronic turntable for a radar target according to a specific embodiment of this application; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a system for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable to a radar target according to a specific embodiment of this application; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the preferred linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets according to an embodiment of this application; Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided according to an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation
[0027] The embodiments of this application are described in detail below. Examples of these embodiments are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions throughout. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and intended to explain this application, and should not be construed as limiting this application.
[0028] The following describes a method and apparatus for selecting the optimal optoelectronic turntable for radar target linkage according to embodiments of this application, with reference to the accompanying drawings. Addressing the issues raised in the background section regarding the related technologies where the linkage mechanism between radar and optoelectronic turntables does not comprehensively consider target characteristics and turntable parameters, leading to difficulties in selecting the optimal turntable for continuous and stable target detection and tracking, this application provides a method for selecting the optimal optoelectronic turntable for radar target linkage. In this method, the adaptability of each optoelectronic turntable is evaluated based on the acquired radar target information and the static parameters of the turntable. The turntable with the highest adaptability is then selected as the linkage detection device with the radar to detect the target, and the target information is further updated based on the detected data. This method enables the selection of the optimal turntable based on radar target information and turntable parameters when multiple turntables are linked with a radar. It effectively avoids resource waste caused by multiple turntables simultaneously tracking the same target, potential target loss due to field-of-view or distance limitations during target movement, and response delays caused by failing to select the turntable with the lowest adjustment cost based on the target's dynamic characteristics. This achieves efficient linkage between the optoelectronic turntable and the radar. This solves the problem in related technologies where the linkage mechanism between radar and photoelectric turntable does not comprehensively consider target characteristics and turntable parameters, making it difficult to select the optimal photoelectric turntable to achieve continuous and stable target detection and tracking.
[0029] Based on the method for optimizing the linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets proposed in this application, a system implementation for optimizing the linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets can be set up, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the system may specifically include: The radar detection module is used to acquire the location and velocity information of radar targets and can continuously track targets.
[0030] The turntable resource management module is used to store the static parameters and real-time status of each optoelectronic turntable, dynamically calculate the adaptation score, and generate a turntable selection priority list.
[0031] The trajectory prediction module is used to update the target's positioning and velocity information based on radar and photoelectric detection information, and predict the target's future position based on Kalman filtering or machine learning algorithms.
[0032] The system's radar detection module can be a Doppler radar; the turntable resource management module and trajectory prediction module form corresponding software services, deployed on a collaborative workstation, and interact with other modules through network connection; the photoelectric turntable consists of multiple calibrated and configured photoelectric turntables within the Doppler radar detection range.
[0033] Doppler radar detects targets such as ships and aircraft in the target area, identifies targets of interest automatically or manually, and sends the target information to the turntable resource management module. The turntable resource management module loads all calibrated and configured optoelectronic turntable information, obtains the current status information of the optoelectronic turntables, and calculates the adaptability of each turntable based on the target information and optoelectronic information.
[0034] Specifically, Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for optimizing the linkage of an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets, provided in an embodiment of this application.
[0035] like Figure 1 As shown, the method for optimizing the linkage of the photoelectric turntable for radar targets includes the following steps: In step S101, the positioning and velocity information of the radar target are acquired, and multiple static parameters of multiple photoelectric turntables are acquired.
[0036] It is understood that radar target sources include, but are not limited to, pulse radar, continuous wave radar, Doppler radar, etc. Those skilled in the art can set them according to the actual scenario, and no specific restrictions are made here.
[0037] Furthermore, radar targets can be understood as targets such as ships and aircraft within the radar detection area; the static parameters of the optoelectronic turntable can be understood as the preset configuration parameters of each optoelectronic turntable, including but not limited to preset parameters such as the field of view, azimuth, and rotation speed of the optoelectronic turntable.
[0038] In one specific embodiment of this application, the radar can be a Doppler radar, and the Doppler radar can be used to detect targets of interest such as ships and aircraft in the target area. The targets of interest can be determined automatically or manually. Furthermore, all calibrated and configured optoelectronic turntable information can be loaded, and the current status information of the optoelectronic turntable can be obtained.
[0039] The embodiments of this application can further calculate the adaptability of each turntable based on the acquired radar target positioning and velocity information and multiple static parameters of multiple photoelectric turntables, providing strong data support for the execution of step S102.
[0040] In step S102, the adaptability score of each optoelectronic turntable is calculated based on the static parameters of each turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target.
[0041] Specifically, based on the azimuth information of the radar target obtained from the above steps, and the information such as multiple static parameters of multiple optoelectronic turntables, the embodiments of this application can further calculate the adaptability of each turntable, wherein the azimuth information may include positioning and velocity information.
[0042] For example, embodiments of this application can construct a scoring model based on target information acquired by radar and configuration parameters of the photoelectric turntable, and then calculate the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable after loading parameters based on the scoring model.
[0043] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the formula for calculating the adaptability score is:
[0044] in, The weights of each factor; It is a distance factor. Photoelectric turntable Distance to the target; It is the speed matching factor. It is the speed of the target. It is an optoelectronic turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position; It is the field of view coverage, representing the target t On the photoelectric turntable Predicted dwell time within the field of view It is the target location. It is the position of the photoelectric turntable. It is the field of view of the photoelectric turntable. Historical stability refers to the photoelectric turntable. The success rate of recent target tracking.
[0045] In actual implementation, the embodiments of this application can construct an adaptability scoring model for the photoelectric platform based on parameters such as the distance between the photoelectric turntable and the target, and the speed of the target.
[0046] This embodiment can select the optimal photoelectric turntable as a linkage device with radar to detect targets by constructing an adaptability scoring model for the photoelectric turntable. The scoring model comprehensively considers the characteristics of the target and the parameters of the photoelectric turntable, thereby better realizing the continuous and stable detection and tracking of the target by the photoelectric turntable.
[0047] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best fit score based on the fit score of each photoelectric turntable includes: determining a preferred threshold; and selecting photoelectric turntables with a fit score higher than the preferred threshold as preferred photoelectric turntables.
[0048] The preferred threshold can be set by those skilled in the art in combination with the actual scenario, and no specific restrictions are imposed here.
[0049] This embodiment can calculate the adaptability of each turntable based on target information and photoelectric information. In calculating the distance factor At that time, the maximum working distance of the photoelectric turntable can be set. , and by If the distance ,but This is to exclude targets that are too far away; when calculating the speed matching factor, r is the field of view radius; when calculating field of view coverage, ; k The default value of 0.5 can be used when there is no historical data. When there is historical data, it can be calculated and the range is [0,1].
[0050] After calculating the adaptability of each turntable, the embodiments of this application may first calculate the adaptability of all turntables. Sort the data and set a preferred threshold. and feasible threshold Furthermore, the photoelectric turntable with an adaptability score higher than the preferred threshold can be selected as the optimal photoelectric turntable.
[0051] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the optimal photoelectric turntable by "determining the preferred threshold and taking the photoelectric turntable with the adaptability score higher than the threshold as the optimal photoelectric turntable", thereby improving the adaptability quality, ensuring that the core requirements are met, simplifying the decision-making process, and improving the selection efficiency.
[0052] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable further includes: when there are multiple preferred photoelectric turntables, calculating the adjustment time of each preferred photoelectric turntable; and selecting the preferred photoelectric turntable with the shortest adjustment time as the optimal photoelectric turntable and using it as the main linkage device. Specifically, the embodiments of this application ensure the adaptability of all turntables. Sort the data and set a preferred threshold. and feasible threshold Furthermore, if multiple photoelectric turntables with adaptability scores higher than the preferred threshold are found to be optimal photoelectric turntables, then... Then, the turntable with the shortest adjustment time ΔTi can be selected; if the highest score result is not higher than the threshold... But higher If the highest rating is not higher than the threshold, then the channel with the highest rating can be selected; If the appropriate turntable cannot be selected, then the control command for the turntable is generated and sent to the turntable for detection.
[0053] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can select the device with the shortest adjustment time and fastest response from multiple optimal photoelectric turntables as the main linkage node. The rapid adjustment capability of the linkage device is the key to maintaining the continuity of the task, thereby achieving the technical goal of "accelerated linkage response, optimized collaborative efficiency, and enhanced task continuity", thus effectively improving the efficiency of target detection and enhancing the dynamic target processing capability.
[0054] In summary, the embodiments of this application can solve the problem of resource waste caused by multiple turntables tracking the same target at the same time by performing adaptability calculations on each photoelectric turntable and then selecting the photoelectric turntable with the highest score as the main linkage device.
[0055] In step S103, the photoelectric turntable with the best score is selected as the main linkage device based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable to perform the corresponding turntable action, and the positioning and velocity information of the radar target is updated based on the radar and photoelectric detection information to dynamically select a new optimal photoelectric turntable.
[0056] In actual implementation, after calculating the compatibility score of each photoelectric turntable, the embodiment of this application can use the photoelectric turntable with the best matching degree as the main linkage device to perform the action, thereby working together with the radar to detect the target's information data, including but not limited to the target's positioning information, speed information, etc.
[0057] Furthermore, in this embodiment, the target's positioning and velocity information can be updated based on the target information detected by radar and photoelectric turntable. The turntable score can then be recalculated based on the new target's positioning and velocity information, and the optimal photoelectric turntable can be reselected as the main linkage device. For example, after a certain time interval (e.g., 5 seconds), the radar and photoelectric detection information of the same target can be acquired again, and the target's positioning and velocity information can be updated accordingly. The future position of the target can be predicted based on Kalman filtering or machine learning algorithms, and the turntable score can be recalculated and the optimal photoelectric turntable can be reselected.
[0058] Through the above technical solution, the embodiments of this application can update the positioning and velocity information of the radar target based on the detection information of radar and photoelectric, and then select a new optimal photoelectric turntable. The impulse division takes into account the dynamic characteristics of the detected target and adaptively adjusts the selection of the turntable with the lowest cost, thereby avoiding the problem of response delay and facilitating the continuous and stable detection and tracking of targets.
[0059] Based on the above, such as Figure 2 As shown, a specific embodiment of the method for selecting the optimal linkage photoelectric turntable for radar targets according to this application is illustrated in the following steps: Step S201: Obtain the positioning and velocity information of the radar target, and load the preset parameters of the photoelectric turntable; For example, in this embodiment of the application, the positioning and speed information of the target can be detected by radar first, and the calibrated and configured photoelectric turntable information of each photoelectric turntable can be loaded, so as to use the above information to calculate the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable.
[0060] Step S202: Calculate the compatibility score for each photoelectric turntable; For example, in this embodiment of the application, the location and velocity information of the target obtained by radar detection in step S201 and the calibration configuration parameters of the optoelectronic turntable can be input into the matching degree model between the optoelectronic turntable and the radar target to calculate the adaptability score of each optoelectronic turntable.
[0061] Step S203: Select the photoelectric turntable with the highest score as the main linkage device and perform the action; The highest-rated photoelectric turntable can be used as the optimal turntable to work in conjunction with radar to detect targets.
[0062] Step S204: Update the target positioning and velocity information to further calculate the adaptability score of the new photoelectric turntable based on the updated target positioning and velocity information.
[0063] After determining the optimal photoelectric turntable and detecting the new target's location and velocity information in step S203, the optimal turntable may not be able to adapt to the target in the new state. Therefore, it is necessary to determine a new optimal turntable to adapt to the target in the new state. Thus, in this embodiment, the adaptability score of the new photoelectric turntable can be calculated based on the updated target location and velocity information, and then a new optimal linkage turntable can be selected.
[0064] The method for optimally linking photoelectric turntables with radar targets, as proposed in this application, evaluates the suitability of each photoelectric turntable based on the acquired radar target information and the static parameters of the turntable. It then selects the turntable with the highest suitability as the linked detection device with the radar to detect the target, and further updates the target information based on the detected data. This method enables the selection of the optimal photoelectric turntable based on radar target information and turntable parameters when multiple turntables are linked with the radar. It effectively avoids resource waste caused by multiple turntables simultaneously tracking the same target, potential target loss due to field-of-view or distance limitations during target movement, and response delays caused by failing to select the turntable with the lowest adjustment cost based on the target's dynamic characteristics. This achieves efficient linkage between the photoelectric turntable and the radar. Therefore, it solves the problems in related technologies where the linkage mechanism between radar and photoelectric turntables does not comprehensively consider target characteristics and turntable parameters, making it difficult to select the optimal photoelectric turntable for continuous and stable target detection and tracking.
[0065] Next, refer to the appendix. Figure 4This application describes an apparatus for a preferred linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets, according to embodiments thereof.
[0066] Figure 4 This is a block diagram of a preferred linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets according to an embodiment of this application.
[0067] like Figure 4 As shown, the device 10 for selecting radar targets and linking photoelectric turntables includes: a loading module 100, a calculation module 200, and a selection module 300.
[0068] The loading module 100 is used to acquire the positioning and velocity information of the radar target, and to acquire multiple static parameters of multiple optoelectronic turntables.
[0069] The calculation module 200 is used to calculate the compatibility score of each optoelectronic turntable based on the static parameters of each turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target.
[0070] The selection module 300 is used to select the photoelectric turntable with the best score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable, so as the main linkage device to perform the corresponding turntable action, and to update the positioning and velocity information of the radar target based on the radar and photoelectric detection information, so as to dynamically select a new optimal photoelectric turntable.
[0071] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the formula for calculating the adaptability score is: , in, The weights of each factor; For distance factor, Photoelectric turntable Distance to the target; For speed matching factor, For the target speed, Photoelectric turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position; For field of view coverage, It is the target location. It is the position of the photoelectric turntable. It is the field of view of the photoelectric turntable. It is historical stability.
[0072] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the selection module 300 includes: a determining unit and a first selection unit; wherein, the determining unit is used to determine a preferred threshold; and the first selection unit is used to select photoelectric turntables with a suitability score higher than the preferred threshold as preferred photoelectric turntables.
[0073] Optionally, in one embodiment of this application, the selection module 300 further includes: a calculation unit and a second selection unit; wherein, the calculation unit is used to calculate the adjustment time of each preferred photoelectric turntable when there are multiple preferred photoelectric turntables; the second selection unit is used to select the preferred photoelectric turntable with the shortest adjustment time as the optimal photoelectric turntable and as the main linkage device.
[0074] It should be noted that the foregoing explanation of the method embodiment for selecting the optimal linkage photoelectric turntable for radar targets also applies to the device for selecting the optimal linkage photoelectric turntable for radar targets in this embodiment, and will not be repeated here.
[0075] The device for optimally linking photoelectric turntables with radar targets, as proposed in the embodiments of this application, can evaluate the adaptability of each photoelectric turntable based on the acquired radar target information and the static parameters of the photoelectric turntables. It then selects the photoelectric turntable with the highest adaptability as the linked detection device with the radar to detect the target, and further updates the target information based on the detected data. This method enables the selection of the optimal photoelectric turntable based on radar target information and turntable parameters when the radar is linked with multiple photoelectric turntables. It effectively avoids resource waste caused by multiple turntables simultaneously tracking the same target, potential target loss due to field-of-view or distance limitations when the target moves, and response delays caused by not selecting the turntable with the lowest adjustment cost based on the target's dynamic characteristics. This achieves efficient linkage between the photoelectric turntable and the radar. Therefore, it solves the problems in related technologies where the linkage mechanism between the radar and the photoelectric turntable does not comprehensively consider target characteristics and turntable parameters, making it difficult to select the optimal photoelectric turntable for continuous and stable target detection and tracking.
[0076] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application. The electronic device may include: The memory 501, the processor 502, and the computer program stored on the memory 501 and capable of running on the processor 502.
[0077] When the processor 502 executes the program, it implements the method for selecting and linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets provided in the above embodiments.
[0078] Furthermore, electronic devices also include: Communication interface 503 is used for communication between memory 501 and processor 502.
[0079] The memory 501 is used to store computer programs that can run on the processor 502.
[0080] Memory 501 may include high-speed RAM memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device.
[0081] If the memory 501, processor 502, and communication interface 503 are implemented independently, then the communication interface 503, memory 501, and processor 502 can be interconnected via a bus to complete communication between them. The bus can be an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, or an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus, etc. The bus can be divided into address bus, data bus, control bus, etc. For ease of representation, Figure 5 The bus is represented by a single thick line, but this does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.
[0082] Optionally, in a specific implementation, if the memory 501, processor 502, and communication interface 503 are integrated on a single chip, then the memory 501, processor 502, and communication interface 503 can communicate with each other through an internal interface.
[0083] Processor 502 may be a central processing unit (CPU), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the embodiments of this application.
[0084] This application also provides a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method for optimally linking an optoelectronic turntable to a radar target.
[0085] This application also provides a computer program product storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method for optimally linking an optoelectronic turntable to a radar target.
[0086] In the description of this specification, the references to terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., indicate that a specific feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of this application. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, without contradiction, those skilled in the art can combine and integrate the different embodiments or examples described in this specification, as well as the features of different embodiments or examples.
[0087] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of this application, "N" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified.
[0088] Any process or method described in the flowchart or otherwise herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or N executable instructions for implementing custom logic functions or processes, and the scope of the preferred embodiments of this application includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as should be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of this application pertain.
[0089] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-included system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: an electrical connection having one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk drive (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Alternatively, the computer-readable medium may be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, since the program can be obtained electronically by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.
[0090] It should be understood that the various parts of this application can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, the N steps or methods can be implemented using software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. If implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or more of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.
[0091] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the methods in the above embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, the program includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiments.
[0092] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into a processing module, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into a module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented as a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.
[0093] The storage medium mentioned above can be a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk, etc. Although embodiments of this application have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting this application. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of this application.
Claims
1. A method for selecting a linkage optoelectronic turntable for radar targets, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Acquire the location and velocity information of radar targets, and acquire multiple static parameters of multiple optoelectronic turntables; The compatibility score of each optoelectronic turntable is calculated based on the static parameters of each turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target. Based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable, the photoelectric turntable with the best score is selected as the main linkage device to perform the corresponding turntable action, and the positioning and velocity information of the radar target is updated according to the radar and photoelectric detection information to dynamically select a new optimal photoelectric turntable.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the suitability score is as follows: , in, The weights of each factor, For distance factor, Photoelectric turntable Distance to target For speed matching factor, For the target speed, Photoelectric turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position For field of view coverage, It is the target location. It is the position of the photoelectric turntable. For the field of view of the photoelectric turntable, For historical stability.
3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best adaptability score based on each photoelectric turntable includes: Determine the preferred threshold; The photoelectric turntable with the adaptability score higher than the preferred threshold is selected as the preferred photoelectric turntable.
4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The step of selecting the photoelectric turntable with the best adaptability score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable further includes: When there are multiple preferred photoelectric turntables, calculate the adjustment time for each preferred photoelectric turntable; The preferred photoelectric turntable with the shortest adjustment time is selected as the optimal photoelectric turntable and is used as the main linkage device.
5. A device for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar target detection, characterized in that, include: The loading module is used to acquire the positioning and velocity information of radar targets, and to acquire multiple static parameters of multiple optoelectronic turntables; The calculation module is used to calculate the compatibility score of each optoelectronic turntable based on the static parameters of each turntable and the azimuth information of the radar target. The selection module is used to select the photoelectric turntable with the best score based on the adaptability score of each photoelectric turntable, and to select the main linkage device to perform the corresponding turntable action. It also updates the positioning and velocity information of the radar target based on the radar and photoelectric detection information to dynamically select a new optimal photoelectric turntable.
6. The apparatus according to claim 5, characterized in that, The formula for calculating the suitability score is as follows: , in, The weights of each factor; For distance factor, Photoelectric turntable Distance to the target; For speed matching factor, For the target speed, Photoelectric turntable Time required to adjust to the target predicted position; For field of view coverage, It is the target location. It is the position of the photoelectric turntable. It is the field of view of the photoelectric turntable. It is historical stability.
7. The apparatus according to claim 5, characterized in that, The selection module includes: A determining unit is used to determine the preferred threshold. The first selection unit is used to select photoelectric turntables with a compatibility score higher than the preferred threshold as preferred photoelectric turntables.
8. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: The memory, the processor, and the computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor executing the program to implement the method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets as described in any one of claims 1-4.
9. A non-volatile computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, The program is executed by the processor to implement the method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets as described in any one of claims 1-4.
10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that, The computer program is executed to implement the method for preferentially linking an optoelectronic turntable for radar targets as described in any one of claims 1-4.