Comprehensive evaluation-based hospitalized physician guidance physician training quality evaluation system

Abstract

The invention discloses an in-patient physician guidance physician training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive evaluation, and relates to the technical field of physician guidance training. Theoretical knowledge of each in-patient physician after training is finished is tested, and a personalized and targeted simulation scene is designed for each in-patient physician for simulation test; meanwhile, the actual work condition of each resident physician is scored, then the training quality of each resident physician is evaluated, and a targeted secondary training scheme is provided for each resident physician, so that multi-dimensional analysis of the training quality of the resident physician is realized, the reliability and authenticity of the training evaluation result of the resident physician are guaranteed, and the training efficiency of the resident physician is improved. And the training result and the secondary training scheme are sent to the guidance physician, reference is provided for knowing the guidance direction of the physician, more professional training guidance is provided for the resident physician, and therefore the training effect of the resident physician is improved again.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of physician mentor training, and particularly relates to a resident physician mentor training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive evaluation. BACKGROUND

[0002] A resident physician is a doctor who receives professional training in a hospital, and a mentor physician is a senior doctor responsible for guiding and educating the resident physician. The resident physician mentor training quality evaluation system uses a variety of evaluation methods to ensure comprehensive and objective evaluation of the performance and development of the resident physician in various aspects, and promotes the personalized growth of the physician and the continuous improvement of the overall training quality through the evaluation results.

[0003] The prior art, such as the formation evaluation optimization system for cloud data clinical medical education training process disclosed in application publication CN108960640A, includes: a basic data management module for managing relevant information of various personnel, departments, professional bases, and bases involved in the system, a training physician scheduling management module for managing the scheduling of trainee students in various rotation departments set in the training plan, a physician training work platform module for recording the clinical work, teaching, and training tasks of students in the rotation process and forming electronic process management data, and a formative evaluation module for applying formative evaluation tools to evaluate physician training and provide feedback on teaching quality and effectiveness through information technology.

[0004] In view of the above scheme, at least the following deficiencies exist: The performance of the resident physician in dealing with patients reflects the communication ability and knowledge mastery of the resident physician, but in the above scheme, different physician-patient communication scenarios are not set for the resident physician according to the weaknesses of different resident physicians to examine the performance of the resident physician, so that the communication between the resident physician and the patient and whether the knowledge reserve of the resident physician meets the needs of the patient cannot be accurately found, and the training quality of the resident physician cannot be evaluated. In addition, the theoretical scores, simulation scores, and actual work scores of the resident physician are not comprehensively analyzed in multiple dimensions in the above scheme, the reference value and accuracy of the training results of the resident physician after training cannot be improved, the subsequent secondary training of the resident physician cannot be provided with reference, and the training effect of the resident physician cannot be improved. SUMMARY

[0005] In view of the above technical deficiencies, the purpose of the present application is to provide a resident physician mentor training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive evaluation.

[0006] To solve the above technical problems, the present application adopts the following technical solutions: the present application provides a resident physician guide physician training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive evaluation, which comprises: a theoretical knowledge evaluation unit, a scene simulation unit, a work evaluation module, a result generation module and a secondary training module.

[0007] The theoretical knowledge evaluation unit comprises a theoretical knowledge training module and a training result analysis module.

[0008] The theoretical knowledge training module is used for training the theoretical knowledge of each resident physician within the training period.

[0009] The training result analysis module is used for testing each resident physician after the training is completed, obtaining the theoretical score table of each resident physician, and analyzing the theoretical training evaluation coefficient of each resident physician.

[0010] The scene simulation unit comprises a simulation scene customization module, a simulation test module and a simulation result analysis module.

[0011] The simulation scene customization module is used for customizing the simulation scene of each resident physician.

[0012] The simulation test module is used for each resident physician to complete the preset task in the corresponding simulation scene during the simulation test, and obtain the simulation score table of each resident physician after completing the task.

[0013] The simulation result analysis module is used for analyzing the simulation test evaluation coefficient of each resident physician according to the simulation score table of each resident physician.

[0014] The work evaluation module is used for obtaining the work data of each resident physician within the training period, obtaining the work score table of each resident physician, and analyzing the actual work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician.

[0015] The result generation module is used for analyzing whether the training quality of each resident physician is qualified according to the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, the simulation test evaluation coefficient and the actual work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician, generating the training report of each resident physician, and sending the training report to the corresponding guide physician of each resident physician.

[0016] The secondary training module is used for generating the secondary training scheme of each resident physician and sending the secondary training scheme to each resident physician and the corresponding guide physician.

[0017] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: This invention provides a comprehensive evaluation system for the quality assessment of resident physician training. It tests the theoretical knowledge of each resident after training, designs personalized and targeted simulation scenarios for each resident, and scores each resident's performance in actual work. Then, it evaluates the training quality of each resident and provides targeted secondary training programs for each resident. This achieves multi-dimensional analysis of resident physician training quality, ensures the reliability and authenticity of the evaluation results, provides targeted secondary training programs for residents, improves training effectiveness, and sends the training results and secondary training programs to supervising physicians, providing guidance and direction, and offering more professional training guidance to residents, thereby further improving the training effectiveness. Attached Figure Description

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0019] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the system structure connection of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0020] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0021] Please see Figure 1 As shown, a comprehensive assessment-based resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system includes: a theoretical knowledge evaluation unit, a scenario simulation unit, a work evaluation module, a result generation module, a secondary training module, and a database.

[0022] The theoretical knowledge evaluation unit includes a theoretical knowledge training module and a training result analysis module.

[0023] The theoretical knowledge training module is used to provide theoretical knowledge training to each resident physician during the training cycle.

[0024] It should be noted that the theoretical knowledge training for each resident physician includes the theoretical knowledge training of the supervising physician corresponding to each resident physician, as well as online courses in the training server. The training server contains several online courses for resident physician training. Resident physicians can access the training server to watch the online courses. At the same time, the training server arranges courses for each supervising physician to teach each resident physician.

[0025] The training results analysis module is used to test each resident physician after the training, obtain their theoretical score sheet, and analyze their theoretical training evaluation coefficient.

[0026] In one specific embodiment, the process of obtaining the theoretical score sheet for each resident physician is as follows: After the training is completed, several test papers and detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper are formulated. After each resident physician completes each test paper, the answer is compared with the standard answer in the detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper. The score for each resident physician corresponding to each test paper is calculated. The scores for each resident physician corresponding to each test paper are statistically summarized in a table to obtain the theoretical score sheet for each resident physician.

[0027] It should be noted that the judges jointly developed the test papers and detailed evaluation criteria using the training server, which assessed various theoretical knowledge areas. These criteria included passing scores and weighting coefficients. The test papers covered aspects such as basic medical knowledge, clinical medical knowledge, and medical ethics and law.

[0028] In the above process, after each resident physician completes each test paper, they upload their test papers to the training server. The training server then compares each resident physician's test paper with the standard answers in the detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper to obtain the score for each resident physician for each test paper. The calculation of test paper scores is already mature in the existing technology, so it will not be elaborated on here.

[0029] In another specific embodiment, the analysis of the theoretical training evaluation coefficients for each resident physician is carried out as follows: The passing score and weighting coefficient for each test paper are obtained from the detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper; the score for each resident physician corresponding to each test paper is recorded as follows. Let f represent the resident physician's ID, r represent the test paper's ID, r = 1, 2, ..., k, and k represent the total number of test papers. f, r, and k are all positive integers. The passing score and weighting coefficient for each test paper are denoted as follows: and By analyzing the formula The theoretical training evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. .

[0030] The scenario simulation unit includes a scenario customization module, a simulation testing module, and a simulation result analysis module.

[0031] The simulation scenario customization module is used to customize simulation scenarios for each resident physician.

[0032] In a specific embodiment, the process of customizing the simulation scenario for each resident physician is as follows: obtain the scores of each case of each resident physician during the training period, select each case with a score lower than the standard score threshold as each labeled case of each resident physician, obtain each condition from each labeled case of each resident physician, and select the condition with the most severe condition as the simulated condition of the simulated patient in the simulation scenario corresponding to each resident physician.

[0033] It should be noted that after each resident physician completes a case, their supervising physician needs to score the case and then store it in the system.

[0034] Obtain each complaint form from each resident physician during the training period. Extract the set of keywords for the complaint events and the basic information of the complaining patients from each complaint form. Merge the sets of keywords for the complaint events from each resident physician's complaint forms to obtain the set of keywords for the simulated events of the simulated patients in the corresponding simulated scenarios for each resident physician.

[0035] The basic information of complaining patients in each complaint form of each resident physician was compared, and the number of complaining patients in each age group and gender was counted. The age group and gender corresponding to the number of complaining patients were selected as the age group and gender of the simulated patients in the corresponding simulation scenario for each resident physician.

[0036] Based on the simulated patient's condition, simulated event keyword set, age group, and gender in the simulation scenario corresponding to each resident physician, the simulation scenario for each resident physician is constructed.

[0037] According to the embodiments of the present invention, each resident physician is given a targeted simulation scenario based on their weaknesses and the complaints they have received. The simulation test is then conducted in the simulation scenario, which can accurately demonstrate each resident physician's medical and communication skills, thereby improving the reliability and authenticity of the simulation test.

[0038] The simulation test module is used to allow each resident physician to complete preset tasks in a corresponding simulated scenario during a simulation test, and to obtain the simulation score sheet for each resident physician after completing the tasks.

[0039] It should be noted that the pre-set tasks were formulated by the judges.

[0040] In a specific embodiment, the process of obtaining the simulated performance reports of each resident physician is as follows: In the simulated scenario for each resident physician, a simulated patient randomly asks questions based on a set of keywords related to the simulated illness and simulated events. Each resident physician answers and processes the questions, and the process is recorded by a camera. Simultaneously, the process of each resident physician in the simulated scenario is displayed on the evaluation server. The evaluation server distributes the simulated performance reports of each resident physician to each judge. Each judge scores each item on the simulated performance report based on the answers and processing of each resident physician in the simulated scenario. The maximum and minimum values ​​of each item in the simulated performance report are removed, and then the average is used to obtain the score for each item in the simulated performance report of each resident physician. Thus, the simulated performance reports of each resident physician are obtained.

[0041] It should be noted that the evaluation server is deployed in the judges' room. It can display the process of each resident physician in the simulation scenario, send each resident physician's simulation score sheet to each judge, and automatically collect each resident physician's simulation score sheet after each judge has completed their scoring. The simulation score sheet includes items such as communication skills with patients and the ability to apply basic knowledge.

[0042] The simulation results analysis module is used to analyze the simulation test evaluation coefficients of each resident physician based on their simulation score sheets.

[0043] In one specific embodiment, the analysis of the simulated test evaluation coefficients for each resident physician is carried out as follows: The passing score and weighting coefficient for each item in the simulated performance table are set, and denoted as follows: and And record the scores for each item in the mock exam results for each resident physician as follows: Let q represent the item number in the simulated score sheet, q = 1, 2, ..., w, where w represents the total number of items in the simulated score sheet. Both q and w are positive integers. This can be determined by analyzing the formula. The simulation test evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician was obtained. .

[0044] The work evaluation module is used to obtain the work data of each resident physician during the training cycle, obtain the work performance table of each resident physician, and analyze the actual work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician.

[0045] In a specific embodiment, the process of obtaining the performance evaluation sheets of each resident physician and analyzing the actual performance evaluation coefficients of each resident physician is as follows: The evaluation server collects the case and surgical records of each resident physician during the training period, displays them on the display port, and distributes the performance evaluation sheets of each resident physician to each evaluator. Each evaluator scores each item in the performance evaluation sheet of each resident physician, and the maximum and minimum values ​​of each evaluator's scores in the performance evaluation sheet of each resident physician are removed. Then, the scores are averaged to obtain the scores of each item in the performance evaluation sheet of each resident physician, thereby obtaining the performance evaluation sheets of each resident physician.

[0046] It should be noted that all resident physicians' medical records and surgical records are stored electronically in the system. The performance evaluation includes items such as theoretical knowledge and practical skills, case recording ability, and surgical skills.

[0047] Set the passing score and weighting coefficient for each item in the performance evaluation table, and denote them as follows: and And the scores for each item in each resident physician's performance record will be recorded as follows: Let 'a' represent the item number in the work performance table, where a = 1, 2, ..., z, and z represent the total number of items in the work performance table. Both a and z are positive integers. Substitute them into the analysis formula. The actual work evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. .

[0048] The results generation module is used to analyze whether the training quality of each resident physician is qualified based on the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and actual work evaluation coefficient, and to generate a training report for each resident physician, which is then sent to the corresponding supervising physician.

[0049] In a specific embodiment, the analysis of whether the training quality of each resident physician is up to standard is carried out as follows: Based on the analysis formula... The training quality evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. In the formula, , , Let represent the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and actual work evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician, respectively. , , These are the weighting coefficients for the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, the simulation test evaluation coefficient, and the actual work evaluation coefficient, respectively.

[0050] It should be noted that the weighting coefficients for the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, the simulated test evaluation coefficient, and the practical work evaluation coefficient are jointly set by the judges. , , All are greater than 0 and less than 1.

[0051] The training quality evaluation coefficient of each resident physician is compared with the set training quality evaluation coefficient threshold. If the training quality evaluation coefficient of a resident physician is less than the training quality evaluation coefficient threshold, it indicates that the training quality of that resident physician is unqualified. Conversely, if the training quality of that resident physician is greater than the threshold, it indicates that the training quality of that resident physician is qualified. This method is used to analyze whether the training quality of each resident physician is qualified.

[0052] As described above, the system includes a training report template. After the training quality analysis of each resident physician is completed, all data generated during the analysis process and the analysis results of the training quality are imported into the corresponding area of ​​the training report template to generate a training report for each resident physician.

[0053] The secondary training module is used to generate secondary training plans for each resident physician and send them to each resident physician and their corresponding supervising physician. The specific process is as follows: if the training quality of a resident physician is qualified, then the secondary training plan for that resident physician is a comprehensive reinforcement plan.

[0054] It should be noted that the training content in the comprehensive enhancement plan is more challenging than all current training content.

[0055] If a resident physician's training quality is unsatisfactory, the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and practical work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician are compared with the set standard theoretical training evaluation coefficient threshold, standard simulation test evaluation coefficient threshold, and standard practical work evaluation coefficient threshold, respectively. If a resident physician's theoretical training evaluation coefficient is less than the standard theoretical training evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is theoretical training. If a resident physician's simulation test evaluation coefficient is less than the standard simulation test evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is simulation training. If a resident physician's practical work evaluation coefficient is less than the standard practical work evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is work training. Then, based on the resident physician's secondary training direction, a secondary training plan is obtained for that resident physician, thus obtaining secondary training plans for each resident physician.

[0056] In a specific embodiment, the process of obtaining the resident physician's secondary training plan is as follows: If the resident physician needs secondary theoretical training, the scores of each test paper corresponding to the resident physician are extracted, and the failure improvement plan corresponding to each test paper is obtained from the database. If the score of a certain test paper corresponding to the resident physician is less than the passing score of the test paper, the failure improvement plan corresponding to the test paper is used as the resident physician's secondary training plan.

[0057] It should be noted that the training content in the failing reinforcement program is of the same difficulty as the current training content.

[0058] If the resident physician needs a second round of simulated training, the scores and passing scores for each item in the resident physician's simulated performance report are extracted, and the corresponding remedial measures for each item in the simulated performance report are retrieved from the database. If the score for a certain item is less than the passing score, the remedial measures for that item are used as the resident physician's second training plan.

[0059] If a resident physician needs retraining, the scores and passing scores for each item in the resident physician's performance record are extracted, and the remedial measures for each item in the performance record are retrieved from the database. If the score for a certain item is less than the passing score, the remedial measures for that item are used as the resident physician's retraining plan; thus, the retraining plans for each resident physician are obtained.

[0060] The database stores the improvement plans for each test paper, the improvement plans for each item in the mock score sheet, and the improvement plans for each item in the work performance sheet. All of these plans are jointly developed by the judges.

[0061] This invention assesses the training quality of each resident physician by testing their theoretical knowledge after training, designing personalized and targeted simulation scenarios for each resident, evaluating their performance in actual work, and providing targeted secondary training programs. This multi-dimensional analysis of resident physician training quality ensures the reliability and authenticity of the evaluation results, improves training effectiveness, and sends the training results and secondary training programs to supervising physicians, providing guidance and more professional training instruction, thereby further enhancing the training outcome.

[0062] The above description is merely an example and illustration of the concept of the present invention. Those skilled in the art can make various modifications or additions to the specific embodiments described or use similar methods to replace them, as long as they do not deviate from the concept of the invention or exceed the scope defined in this specification, they should all fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A comprehensive assessment-based system for evaluating the quality of residency training for supervising physicians, characterized in that, include: Theoretical knowledge evaluation unit, scenario simulation unit, work evaluation module, and result generation module; The theoretical knowledge evaluation unit includes a theoretical knowledge training module and a training result analysis module; The theoretical knowledge training module is used to provide theoretical knowledge training to each resident physician during the training cycle. The training results analysis module is used to test each resident physician after the training, obtain the theoretical score sheet of each resident physician, and analyze the theoretical training evaluation coefficient of each resident physician. The scenario simulation unit includes a scenario customization module, a simulation testing module, and a simulation result analysis module; The simulation scenario customization module is used to customize the simulation scenarios for each resident physician. The simulation test module is used to allow each resident physician to complete preset tasks in a corresponding simulated scenario during the simulation test, and to obtain the simulation score sheet of each resident physician after completing the task. The simulation results analysis module is used to analyze the simulation test evaluation coefficient of each resident physician based on their simulation score sheet. The work evaluation module is used to obtain the work data of each resident physician during the training cycle, obtain the work performance table of each resident physician, and analyze the actual work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician. The results generation module is used to analyze whether the training quality of each resident physician is qualified based on the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and actual work evaluation coefficient, and to generate a training report for each resident physician, which is then sent to the corresponding supervising physician.

2. The resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that, The specific process for obtaining the theoretical score sheets of each resident physician is as follows: After the training, several test papers and detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper were developed. After each resident physician completed each test paper, their answers were compared with the standard answers in the detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper. The scores of each resident physician for each test paper were calculated and statistically analyzed in a table to obtain the theoretical score table for each resident physician.

3. The resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive assessment according to claim 2, characterized in that, The analysis of the theoretical training evaluation coefficients for each resident physician is performed as follows: The passing score and weighting coefficient for each test paper were obtained from the detailed evaluation criteria for each test paper. The corresponding score for each resident physician for each test paper was then recorded as follows: Let f represent the resident physician's ID, r represent the test paper's ID, r = 1, 2, ..., k, and k represent the total number of test papers. f, r, and k are all positive integers. The passing score and weighting coefficient for each test paper are denoted as follows: and By analyzing the formula The theoretical training evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. .

4. The resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive assessment according to claim 3, characterized in that, The specific process for customizing the simulation scenarios for each resident physician is as follows: The scores of each case of each resident physician during the training period are obtained. Cases with scores lower than the standard case score threshold are selected as the labeled cases of each resident physician. The condition of each patient is obtained from the labeled cases of each resident physician. The condition with the most severe condition is selected as the simulated condition of the simulated patient in the simulation scenario corresponding to each resident physician. Obtain each complaint form from each resident physician during the training period, extract the set of complaint event keywords and basic information of the complaining patients from each complaint form, merge the set of complaint event keywords from each complaint form from each resident physician, and obtain the set of simulated event keywords for the simulated patients in the corresponding simulated scenarios for each resident physician. Compare the basic information of the complaining patients in each complaint form of each resident physician, count the number of complaining patients in each age group and gender, and select the age group and gender corresponding to the number of complaining patients as the age group and gender of the simulated patients in the corresponding simulation scenario for each resident physician. Based on the simulated patient's condition, simulated event keyword set, age group, and gender in the simulation scenario corresponding to each resident physician, the simulation scenario for each resident physician is constructed.

5. A comprehensive assessment-based resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system according to claim 4, characterized in that, The specific process for obtaining the simulated performance scores of each resident physician is as follows: In each resident physician's simulation scenario, simulated patients randomly ask questions based on a set of keywords related to simulated illnesses and events. Each resident physician answers and handles these questions, and the process is recorded by a camera. Simultaneously, the process is displayed on an evaluation server. The evaluation server then distributes simulation score sheets to each resident physician's judges. Each judge scores each resident physician based on their answers and handling of each item on the simulation score sheet, resulting in individual judge scores for each item on the simulation score sheet. The maximum and minimum scores for each item on the simulation score sheet are removed, and the average score is then calculated to obtain the final score for each item on the simulation score sheet for each resident physician. This process yields the simulation score sheet for each resident physician.

6. The resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive assessment according to claim 5, characterized in that, The analysis of the simulated test evaluation coefficients for each resident physician is performed as follows: Passing scores and weighting coefficients are set for each item in the simulated score sheet, denoted as follows: and And record the scores for each item in the mock exam results for each resident physician as follows: Let q represent the item number in the simulated score sheet, q = 1, 2, ..., w, where w represents the total number of items in the simulated score sheet. Both q and w are positive integers. This can be determined by analyzing the formula. The simulation test evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician was obtained. .

7. A comprehensive assessment-based resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system according to claim 6, characterized in that, The specific process for obtaining the performance records of each resident physician and analyzing the actual performance evaluation coefficient of each resident physician is as follows: The evaluation server collects the case and surgical records of each resident physician during the training period, displays them on the physical port, and distributes the work performance sheets of each resident physician to each evaluator. Each evaluator scores each item in the work performance sheet of each resident physician, and the maximum and minimum values ​​of each evaluator's scores in the work performance sheet of each resident physician are removed and then averaged to obtain the score of each item in the work performance sheet of each resident physician. Thus, the work performance sheets of each resident physician are obtained. Set the passing score and weighting coefficient for each item in the performance evaluation table, and denote them as follows: and And the scores for each item in each resident physician's performance record will be recorded as follows: Let a = 1, 2, ..., z, where z represents the total number of items in the work performance sheet. Both a and z are positive integers. Substitute these values ​​into the analysis formula. The actual work evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. .

8. The resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system based on comprehensive assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that, The analysis of whether the training quality of each resident physician is up to standard is conducted as follows: Based on the analysis formula... The training quality evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician is obtained. In the formula, , , Let represent the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and actual work evaluation coefficient of the f-th resident physician, respectively. , , These are the weighting coefficients for the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, the simulation test evaluation coefficient, and the actual work evaluation coefficient, respectively. The training quality evaluation coefficient of each resident physician is compared with the set training quality evaluation coefficient threshold. If the training quality evaluation coefficient of a resident physician is less than the training quality evaluation coefficient threshold, it indicates that the training quality of that resident physician is unqualified. Conversely, if the training quality of that resident physician is greater than the threshold, it indicates that the training quality of that resident physician is qualified. This method is used to analyze whether the training quality of each resident physician is qualified.

9. A comprehensive assessment-based resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system according to claim 7, characterized in that, It also includes a secondary training module, which is used to generate secondary training plans for each resident physician and send them to each resident physician and their corresponding supervising physician. The specific process is as follows: If a resident physician's training quality is satisfactory, then the resident physician's secondary training program will be a comprehensive reinforcement program. If a resident physician's training quality is unsatisfactory, the theoretical training evaluation coefficient, simulation test evaluation coefficient, and practical work evaluation coefficient of each resident physician are compared with the set standard theoretical training evaluation coefficient threshold, standard simulation test evaluation coefficient threshold, and standard practical work evaluation coefficient threshold, respectively. If a resident physician's theoretical training evaluation coefficient is less than the standard theoretical training evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is theoretical training. If a resident physician's simulation test evaluation coefficient is less than the standard simulation test evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is simulation training. If a resident physician's practical work evaluation coefficient is less than the standard practical work evaluation coefficient threshold, then the resident physician's secondary training direction is work training. Then, based on the resident physician's secondary training direction, a secondary training plan is obtained for that resident physician, thus obtaining secondary training plans for each resident physician.

10. A comprehensive assessment-based resident physician mentoring training quality evaluation system according to claim 9, characterized in that, The specific process for obtaining the resident physician's secondary training program is as follows: If the resident physician needs secondary theoretical training, the scores of each test paper corresponding to the resident physician will be extracted, and the corresponding failure improvement plan for each test paper will be obtained from the database. If the score of the resident physician corresponding to a certain test paper is less than the passing score of that test paper, the failure improvement plan corresponding to that test paper will be used as the secondary training plan for the resident physician. If the resident physician needs a second simulation training, the scores and passing scores of each item in the resident physician's simulation score sheet are extracted, and the corresponding failure improvement plan for each item in the simulation score sheet is obtained from the database. If the score of a certain item is less than the passing score, the failure improvement plan corresponding to that item is used as the resident physician's second training plan. If a resident physician needs retraining, the scores and passing scores for each item in the resident physician's performance record are extracted, and the remedial measures for each item in the performance record are retrieved from the database. If the score for a certain item is less than the passing score, the remedial measures for that item are used as the resident physician's retraining plan; thus, the retraining plans for each resident physician are obtained.

Images