A fusion training method and system for multiple cognitive abilities

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of fusion training method and system for multiple cognitive abilities.The fusion training method includes: obtaining the cognitive evaluation result of user for attention, inhibition and memory;Based on the cognitive evaluation result, obtain the first training parameter related to attention and inhibition;Based on the first training parameter, obtain the second training parameter related to memory;Based on the first training parameter and the second training parameter, configure the cognitive training task of corresponding difficulty level and training duration for user;Push the cognitive training task to user for cognitive training, for simultaneously training the attention, inhibition and memory of user;Obtain the cognitive training data of user, and feedback the current cognitive training result to user.The fusion training method can integrate multidimensional cognitive ability training into one, break the common single cognitive ability training form, and help to improve and transfer the comprehensive ability of user.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities, and also to a corresponding fusion training system, belonging to the field of cognitive training technology. Background Technology

[0002] Cognitive impairment, as a common disease, is increasingly highlighting its negative impact on the quality of life of the elderly. It manifests as various cognitive problems such as memory loss, inattention, and declining executive function, severely affecting the daily functions and self-care abilities of the elderly.

[0003] Currently, treatments for cognitive impairment mainly fall into two categories: pharmacological therapy and non-pharmacological therapy. However, pharmacological therapy has limited effectiveness in improving cognitive deficits and is unlikely to fundamentally reverse the trend of cognitive decline. Non-pharmacological therapies, especially cognitive training based on theories of brain neuroplasticity and brain network functional remodeling, can, to some extent, compensate for the shortcomings of pharmacological intervention. Through systematic and repetitive task training, cognitive training can effectively strengthen brain regions and their network connections related to cognitive functions such as attention and inhibitory control, thereby improving an individual's information processing ability in specific task situations. Its ultimate goal is to promote the transfer of training effects to cognitive behaviors in daily life.

[0004] However, most currently widely used cognitive training methods are based on single experimental paradigms, such as the Go-Nogo paradigm for improving sustained attention or the Stroop paradigm for improving inhibitory control. These classic paradigms and their derivative training programs often focus on training a specific cognitive dimension, leading to fragmented and uncoordinated training of different cognitive abilities. For older adults with multiple cognitive deficits, comprehensively improving multiple cognitive functions, including attention and inhibitory abilities, usually requires participating in multiple independent training programs sequentially. This is not only time-consuming but also poses a significant challenge to their already limited attentional resources. Furthermore, this isolated and singular training model makes it difficult to achieve systematic integration and comprehensive improvement of cognitive abilities, thus limiting the effective transfer of training effects to real-life scenarios. Therefore, how to overcome the limitations of existing single-cognitive-ability training and develop an integrated training program that can simultaneously train multiple cognitive functions and promote their synergistic improvement and practical application has become a critical issue urgently needing to be addressed in the field of cognitive rehabilitation technology. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The primary technical problem to be solved by this invention is to provide a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities.

[0006] Another technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities.

[0007] To achieve the above-mentioned technical objectives, the present invention adopts the following technical solution: According to a first aspect of the present invention, a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities is provided, comprising the following steps: Obtain users' cognitive assessment results regarding attention, inhibition, and memory; Based on the cognitive assessment results, a first training parameter related to attention and inhibition is obtained; wherein, the first training parameter includes at least the proportion and duration of different stimuli appearing during training, the different stimuli include at least standard stimuli and deviated stimuli, and the proportion of standard stimuli appearing is greater than that of deviated stimuli; Based on the first training parameters, a second training parameter related to memory is obtained; wherein, the second training parameter includes at least the type of biased stimulus that needs to be memorized during training and the correspondence between the biased stimulus and the behavioral response; Based on the first training parameters and the second training parameters, a cognitive training task with a corresponding difficulty level and training duration is configured for the user; wherein, the cognitive training task is configured as follows: requiring the user to observe the stimuli that appear, suppress the behavioral response to the standard stimuli, and perform a corresponding behavioral response to the deviation stimuli according to the correspondence between the memorized deviation stimuli and the behavioral response. The cognitive training task is pushed to the user for cognitive training, in order to simultaneously train the user's attention, inhibition and memory. Obtain the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback on the current cognitive training results to the user.

[0008] Preferably, the step of obtaining the first training parameters related to attention and inhibition based on the cognitive assessment results specifically includes: Based on the user's cognitive assessment results, the user's cognitive level is output; Based on the user's cognitive level, the proportion and duration of the appearance of standard stimuli and biased stimuli in training are retrieved from the preset rule base and element base. The lower the user's cognitive level, the lower the proportion of the biased stimulus, and the proportion of the standard stimulus is always greater than that of the biased stimulus; furthermore, the lower the user's cognitive level, the longer the duration of the stimulus presentation.

[0009] Preferably, the types of the deviation stimuli are at least two, and each type of deviation stimulus corresponds to a specific behavioral response; The second training parameter consists of all the types of biased stimuli that the user needs to memorize, as well as the correspondence between each type of biased stimulus and a specific behavioral response.

[0010] Preferably, the specific behavioral response includes at least: Perform the first operation in response to this type of biased stimulus; For this type of biased stimulus, perform the first operation and do not perform the second operation; For this type of biased stimulus, perform the first operation and then the second operation; The first operation is a task operation for cognitive training tasks, and the second operation is a body operation for individual users.

[0011] Preferably, the fusion training method further includes: Based on the user's behavioral response data during cognitive training, the correctness or incorrectness of the user's selection is determined; If the user's cumulative number of correct answers reaches a first preset value, the difficulty level of the next task trial will increase by one; if the user's cumulative number of incorrect answers reaches a second preset value, the difficulty level of the next task trial will decrease by one.

[0012] Preferably, the fusion training method further includes: After the preset training duration, the system displays the user the cumulative training duration, score trend, and score position within the norm group, along with an interpretation of the corresponding capabilities. The preset duration includes at least one week or one month.

[0013] Preferably, the fusion training method further includes: Obtain the user's training preferences; wherein, the training preferences include at least: the user's preferred task types, training methods, and training environments; Personalized training is designed based on the training preferences to create personalized training scenarios for the user. Based on the personalized training scenario, the cognitive training task is pushed to the user for cognitive training.

[0014] According to a second aspect of the present invention, a fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities is provided, comprising: A cognitive assessment unit is used to collect user information and perform cognitive assessments on the user's attention, inhibition, and memory to output cognitive assessment results. The parameter configuration unit includes a first parameter configuration module and a second parameter configuration module. The first parameter configuration module is connected to the cognitive assessment unit to obtain a first training parameter related to attention and inhibition based on the cognitive assessment result. The second parameter configuration module is connected to the first parameter configuration module to obtain a second training parameter related to memory based on the first training parameter. The training unit is connected to the parameter configuration unit to configure a cognitive training task with a corresponding difficulty level and training duration for the user based on the first training parameter and the second training parameter; and pushes the cognitive training task to the user for cognitive training to simultaneously train the user's attention, inhibition and memory. A training feedback unit, connected to the training unit, is used to acquire the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback on the current cognitive training results to the user.

[0015] Preferably, the fusion training system further includes: A difficulty adjustment unit, connected to the training unit, dynamically adjusts the difficulty level of the next task trial based on the user's behavioral response data during cognitive training, by accumulating the number of correct answers or the number of incorrect answers.

[0016] According to a third aspect of the present invention, a computer storage medium is provided, including a processor and a memory, wherein the processor reads a computer program in the memory for executing the above-described fusion training method.

[0017] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following technical effects: (1) According to the cognitive assessment results of the user, the present invention configures the first training parameters for the Oddball task and the second training parameters for the memory task for the user, thereby using the first training parameters and the second training parameters to form a cognitive training task. Thus, while retaining the core design of the classic Oddball paradigm, it innovates the form and integrates multi-dimensional cognitive ability training, breaking the common single cognitive ability training form, which helps to improve and transfer comprehensive abilities.

[0018] (2) According to the classification of the deviation stimulus, the present invention also corresponds a specific behavioral response to it. The specific behavioral response includes both task operations for cognitive training tasks and physical operations for individual users, thereby further training the user's limb coordination ability. (3) In the process of configuring cognitive training tasks for users, personalized training design can be carried out based on the user's training preferences to form a personalized training scenario for the user, so as to improve the user's training compliance. Attached Figure Description

[0019] Figure 1 The first embodiment of the present invention provides an overall flowchart of a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities; Figure 2 A detailed flowchart of a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities provided in the first embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 The diagram shows a structure of a fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities provided in the second embodiment of the present invention. Figure 4 This is a structural diagram of a fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities provided in the third embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0020] The technical content of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.

[0021] The embodiments of this invention are designed based on the Oddball paradigm. While retaining the core design of the classic Oddball paradigm, they innovate in form, integrating multi-dimensional cognitive ability training into one, breaking away from the common single cognitive ability training form, and helping to improve and transfer users' comprehensive abilities.

[0022] In this embodiment of the invention, the core of the Oddball paradigm lies in classifying stimuli into standard stimuli and deviant stimuli. The probability of occurrence of standard stimuli is much greater than that of deviant stimuli, requiring users to respond only when deviant stimuli occur. Based on this core design, deviant stimuli are further categorized, and different categories of deviant stimuli are associated with different behavioral responses. Users are required to memorize the behavioral responses corresponding to different deviant stimuli, suppressing impulsive behavioral responses while simultaneously distinguishing between different deviant stimuli and responding accordingly. Thus, this innovative approach integrates training in cognitive abilities such as attention, inhibition, and memory, fully mobilizing multiple cognitive abilities in the user. This allows users to receive comprehensive multidimensional cognitive training in a single cognitive session, making it particularly suitable for elderly individuals with weak attention spans and multiple cognitive deficits.

[0023] First Embodiment like Figure 1 and Figure 2 As shown, the first embodiment of the present invention provides a fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities, which specifically includes the following steps: S10: Obtain the user's cognitive assessment results.

[0024] Specifically, by collecting basic information such as users' age and gender, and conducting tests or scales related to abilities such as attention, inhibitory control, and memory, cognitive assessment results for attention, inhibition, and memory can be obtained.

[0025] It should be understood that in this embodiment, since cognitive training mainly targets the user's attention, inhibition, and memory, the cognitive assessment primarily evaluates these three cognitive abilities. In other embodiments, other cognitive abilities may be assessed based on the training needs, and no specific limitations are made here.

[0026] S20: Training parameter configuration.

[0027] After completing the cognitive assessment of the user based on step S10 above, it is necessary to configure corresponding training parameters for the user according to the cognitive assessment results. Specifically, step S20 includes two parts: the first training parameters for the Oddball task (corresponding to step S21) and the second training parameters for the memory task (corresponding to step S22).

[0028] Specifically, it includes the following steps: S21: The first training parameter for the Oddball task.

[0029] In this embodiment, the Oddball task includes standard stimuli and biased stimuli. Standard stimuli appear in a larger proportion, while biased stimuli appear in a smaller proportion. Users are required to suppress their behavioral responses to standard stimuli and only respond to biased stimuli. The first training parameter includes at least the proportion of different stimuli appearing during training and their presentation duration.

[0030] Specifically, in this training, the standard stimuli and the biased stimuli are two different types of aircraft. Among them, friendly aircraft are the standard stimuli that appear more frequently, while enemy aircraft are the biased stimuli that appear less frequently. Users are required to continuously pay attention to the aircraft that appear on the screen during training, and only react aggressively (by pressing a button) when enemy aircraft appear, while suppressing the impulse to attack friendly aircraft (by not pressing a button).

[0031] When configuring the first training parameters, the parameters related to the Oddball task are retrieved from the rule base: (1) difficulty level; (2) aircraft type; (3) the proportion of different types of aircraft; (4) aircraft presentation duration.

[0032] The proportion of different aircraft types is as follows: According to the Oddball paradigm, stimuli are divided into two main categories: standard stimuli and deviated stimuli. Standard stimuli have a higher proportion of occurrence, while deviated stimuli have a lower proportion. In this training exercise, friendly aircraft are the standard stimuli, and enemy aircraft are the deviated stimuli. The two types of aircraft appear randomly, with a fixed ratio parameter of 3:1.

[0033] Aircraft Presentation Duration: The aircraft presentation duration is the length of time an aircraft appears on the screen and disappears. Shorter presentation times require users to pay attention and identify aircraft types more quickly; simultaneously, a greater number of aircraft appear within a fixed training duration requires users to maintain attention on more aircraft, resulting in a more intensive attention training. In this training, the initial aircraft presentation duration is 4000ms, decreasing in increments of 100ms. For each level of training difficulty increase, the aircraft presentation duration decreases by 100ms.

[0034] S22: The second training parameter for the memory task.

[0035] In this embodiment, the memory task is nested within the Oddball task. The biased stimuli in the Oddball task are categorized and associated with different behavioral responses, requiring the user to remember the corresponding actions for each biased stimuli. The second training parameter includes at least the types of biased stimuli to be memorized during training and the correspondence between these stimuli and behavioral responses.

[0036] Specifically, this training includes various enemy aircraft, each requiring different munitions for attack. Users need to remember the correspondence between different enemy aircraft and munitions, and when enemy aircraft appear, identify their type and select the correct munitions to attack.

[0037] When configuring the second training parameters, the parameters related to the memory task are retrieved from the rule base: (1) difficulty level; (2) aircraft type; (3) ammunition type; (4) aircraft-ammunition correspondence.

[0038] In this embodiment, the correspondence between aircraft types, ammunition types, and aircraft-ammunition is as follows: there is a one-to-one correspondence between enemy aircraft and ammunition. The number of enemy aircraft types is N, and the number of ammunition types is M, where M=N. The more enemy aircraft types there are, the more ammunition is required, and the more correspondences between enemy aircraft and ammunition are established, making it more difficult for the user to memorize. In this training, N is set to 2, M is set to 2, and the number of aircraft-ammunition correspondences to be memorized is 2. During each training session, aircraft types and ammunition types are randomly matched.

[0039] Furthermore, preferably, each type of deviation stimulus corresponds to a specific behavioral response. This specific behavioral response includes at least: performing a first operation in response to the deviation stimulus of that type; performing the first operation in response to the deviation stimulus of that type without performing a second operation; and performing both the first and second operations in response to the deviation stimulus of that type. The first operation is a task-specific operation for the cognitive training task (e.g., tapping the screen), and the second operation is a physical operation specific to the user (e.g., raising a leg). For example, when a user attacks an enemy aircraft with specific ammunition, they also need to perform a leg raise or other physical movements. Thus, while training and improving the user's attention, inhibition, and memory, it also trains the user's physical coordination.

[0040] S30: Configure cognitive training tasks.

[0041] After obtaining the parameter configurations for the Oddball task and the memory task based on the above step S20, a cognitive training task with corresponding difficulty level and training duration is configured for the user. This cognitive training task is configured as follows: the user is required to observe the presented stimuli, suppress behavioral responses to standard stimuli, and respond to deviation stimuli according to the correspondence between the memorized deviation stimuli and behavioral responses.

[0042] Furthermore, in this embodiment, if the user is an initial training user, the initial parameter configuration of the training task (i.e., the initial difficulty level and initial training duration) is retrieved. If the user is not an initial training user, the task difficulty level and training duration corresponding to the user's cognitive ability level at the end of the last training are inherited and used as the task difficulty level and training duration for this user's current training.

[0043] Furthermore, preferably, during the process of configuring cognitive training tasks for users, the user's training preferences can also be obtained. These preferences include at least: the user's preferred task types, training methods, and training environments. Therefore, personalized training designs can be developed based on these preferences to create personalized training scenarios tailored to the user.

[0044] S40: Push cognitive training tasks to users for cognitive training.

[0045] Once a cognitive training task is configured based on the above step S30, it is pushed to the user for cognitive training in a personalized training scenario, thereby simultaneously training the user's attention, inhibition, and memory.

[0046] In this embodiment, the specific training process is as follows: The first step is the rules explanation phase.

[0047] Retrieve the rule description page from the rule base, which includes rule diagrams and instructions. Each rule diagram consists of three parts: background story, memory task content, and Oddball task behavioral response instructions. Each diagram is accompanied by corresponding instructions to explain the specific content. A "Start Training" button is displayed at the bottom of the last page of diagrams.

[0048] The second step is for the user to click the "Start Training" button to begin training.

[0049] Retrieve a background image from the background image library.

[0050] Retrieve the difficulty level and related parameter configurations for this training from the rule base.

[0051] Retrieve from the element library: (1) types of aircraft; (2) types of ammunition; (3) the correspondence between aircraft and ammunition.

[0052] The animation shows the user's aircraft continuously flying in the air, with aircraft targets appearing in front of the user's aircraft, and different types of ammunition displayed at the bottom of the screen. When friendly aircraft appear, the user does not take any action; when enemy aircraft appear, the user clicks on the correct ammunition to attack, based on the aircraft type and aircraft-ammunition correspondence memorized in the rules description.

[0053] The third step involves recording the user's correct / incorrect answers and reaction time in the user database, and adjusting the difficulty of the next round based on the user's accumulated correct / incorrect answers. Specifically, for each round a user answers correctly, the accumulated correct score is incremented by 1. When the accumulated correct score reaches 2 consecutive times, the difficulty of the next round increases by one level, and the accumulated correct score counter is reset to zero and recalculated. For each round a user answers incorrectly, the difficulty of the next round decreases by one level.

[0054] S50: Obtain the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback to the user on the current cognitive training results.

[0055] Specifically, the system presents training feedback and explains the purpose and significance of the training based on information such as the user's training duration, number of rounds, score, and final difficulty level. Simultaneously, the user's training duration, final score, and difficulty level are stored in the user database.

[0056] Furthermore, after the preset training duration (e.g., one week or one month), users are shown the cumulative training time, score trends, and their score's position within the norm group, along with corresponding ability interpretations. This allows for the presentation of periodic training results to users through weekly or monthly reports, helping to build confidence and improve training adherence.

[0057] Second Embodiment like Figure 3As shown, based on the first embodiment described above, the second embodiment of the present invention provides a fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities, including a cognitive assessment unit 1, a parameter configuration unit 2, a training unit 3, and a training feedback unit 4.

[0058] The cognitive assessment unit 1 is used to collect user information and conduct cognitive assessments on the user's attention, inhibition, and memory to output cognitive assessment results.

[0059] The parameter configuration unit 2 includes a first parameter configuration module 21 and a second parameter configuration module 22. The first parameter configuration module 21 is connected to the cognitive assessment unit 1 to obtain first training parameters related to attention and inhibition based on the cognitive assessment results. The second parameter configuration module 22 is connected to the first parameter configuration module 21 to obtain second training parameters related to memory based on the first training parameters.

[0060] Training unit 3 is connected to parameter configuration unit 2 to jointly configure cognitive training tasks with corresponding difficulty levels and training durations for the user based on the first training parameters and the second training parameters; and pushes cognitive training tasks to the user for cognitive training to simultaneously train the user's attention, inhibition and memory.

[0061] Training feedback unit 4 is connected to training unit 3 to acquire the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback on the current cognitive training results to the user.

[0062] Furthermore, preferably, the integrated training system also includes: Difficulty adjustment unit 5 is connected to training unit 3 to dynamically adjust the difficulty level of the next task trial based on the user's behavioral response data during cognitive training, by accumulating the number of correct or incorrect results.

[0063] It is understood that in this embodiment, the functions and connections of the above-mentioned module units are only one specific implementation method for the fusion training method in the first embodiment. In other embodiments, the functions and connections of the module units can be adaptively adjusted as needed, and no specific limitations are made here.

[0064] Third Embodiment like Figure 4 As shown, based on the above-described fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities, this invention further provides a computer storage medium. This computer storage medium includes one or more processors and a memory. The memory is coupled to the processor and is used to store one or more programs. When the programs are executed by the processor, the processor enables the processor to implement the fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities as described in the above embodiments.

[0065] The processor controls the overall operation of the integrated training system to complete all or part of the steps of the integrated training method for multiple cognitive abilities. The processor can be a central processing unit (CPU), graphics processing unit (GPU), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), digital signal processing (DSP) chip, etc. The memory stores various types of data to support operations on the computer's storage medium. This data may include, for example, instructions for any application or method operating on the integrated training system, as well as application-related data. The memory can be implemented using any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as static random access memory (SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), read-only memory (ROM), magnetic storage, flash memory, etc.

[0066] In one exemplary embodiment, the computer storage medium may be implemented by a computer chip or physical entity, or by a product with certain functions, for executing the aforementioned fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities and achieving the same technical effect as the method described above. A typical embodiment is a computer. Specifically, the computer may be, for example, a personal computer, a laptop computer, an in-vehicle human-machine interaction device, a cellular phone, a camera phone, a smartphone, a personal digital assistant, a media player, a navigation device, an email device, a game console, a tablet computer, a wearable device, or any combination of these devices.

[0067] In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium including program instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities in any of the above embodiments. For example, the computer-readable storage medium may be the memory including the program instructions described above, which may be executed by the processor of the fusion training system to complete the fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities described above and achieve the same technical effects as the method described above.

[0068] It should be noted that the above embodiments are merely illustrative examples. The technical solutions of each embodiment can be combined, and all are within the protection scope of this invention.

[0069] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the type of technical feature indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of this invention, "a plurality of" means two or more, unless otherwise explicitly specified. The above provides a detailed description of the integrated training method and system for multiple cognitive abilities provided by this invention. Any obvious modifications made by those skilled in the art without departing from the essence of this invention will constitute an infringement of the patent rights of this invention and will incur corresponding legal liability.

Claims

1. A fusion training method for multiple cognitive abilities, characterized in that... Includes the following steps: Obtain users' cognitive assessment results regarding attention, inhibition, and memory; Based on the cognitive assessment results, a first training parameter related to attention and inhibition is obtained; wherein, the first training parameter includes at least the proportion and duration of different stimuli appearing during training, the different stimuli include at least standard stimuli and deviated stimuli, and the proportion of standard stimuli appearing is greater than that of deviated stimuli; Based on the first training parameters, a second training parameter related to memory is obtained; wherein, the second training parameter includes at least the type of biased stimulus that needs to be memorized during training and the correspondence between the biased stimulus and the behavioral response; The first training parameters and the second training parameters are obtained in the following ways: Based on the user's cognitive assessment results, the user's cognitive level is output. Based on the user's cognitive level, the proportion and duration of standard and biased stimuli during training are retrieved from a preset rule base and element base. Specifically, the lower the user's cognitive level, the lower the proportion of biased stimuli, and the proportion of standard stimuli is always greater than that of biased stimuli. Furthermore, the lower the user's cognitive level, the longer the duration of stimulus presentation. The types of biased stimuli are at least two, and each type corresponds to a specific behavioral response. All types of biased stimuli that the user needs to memorize, and the correspondence between each type of biased stimulus and the specific behavioral response, together constitute the second training parameter. Based on the first training parameters and the second training parameters, a cognitive training task with a corresponding difficulty level and training duration is configured for the user; wherein, the cognitive training task is configured as follows: requiring the user to observe the stimuli that appear, suppress the behavioral response to the standard stimuli, and perform a corresponding behavioral response to the deviation stimuli according to the correspondence between the memorized deviation stimuli and the behavioral response. The cognitive training task is pushed to the user for cognitive training, in order to simultaneously train the user's attention, inhibition and memory. Obtain the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback on the current cognitive training results to the user.

2. The fusion training method as described in claim 1, characterized in that... The specific behavioral response includes at least: Perform the first operation in response to this type of biased stimulus; For this type of biased stimulus, perform the first operation and do not perform the second operation; For this type of biased stimulus, perform the first operation and then the second operation; The first operation is a task operation for cognitive training tasks, and the second operation is a body operation for individual users.

3. The fusion training method as described in claim 1, characterized in that... Also includes: Based on the user's behavioral response data during cognitive training, the correctness or incorrectness of the user's selection is determined; If the user's cumulative correct count reaches the first preset value, the difficulty level of the next task trial will be increased by one; If the user's cumulative number of errors reaches the second preset value, the difficulty level of the next task trial will be reduced by one.

4. The fusion training method as described in claim 1, characterized in that... Also includes: After the training has been completed for the preset duration, the system displays the cumulative training duration, score trend, and score position within the norm group to the user, along with an interpretation of the corresponding abilities.

5. The fusion training method as described in claim 1, characterized in that... Also includes: Obtain the user's training preferences; wherein, the training preferences include at least: the user's preferred task types, training methods, and training environments; Personalized training is designed based on the training preferences to create a personalized training scenario for the user; based on the personalized training scenario, the cognitive training task is pushed to the user for cognitive training.

6. A fusion training system for multiple cognitive abilities, used to implement the fusion training method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that... include: A cognitive assessment unit is used to collect user information and perform cognitive assessments on the user's attention, inhibition, and memory to output cognitive assessment results. The parameter configuration unit includes a first parameter configuration module and a second parameter configuration module. The first parameter configuration module is connected to the cognitive assessment unit to obtain first training parameters related to attention and inhibition based on the cognitive assessment results. The second parameter configuration module is connected to the first parameter configuration module to obtain second training parameters related to memory based on the first training parameters. Specifically, the first and second training parameters are obtained as follows: Based on the user's cognitive assessment results, the user's cognitive level is output; based on the user's cognitive level, the proportion and duration of standard and biased stimuli appearing in training are retrieved from a preset rule base and element base; wherein, the lower the user's cognitive level, the lower the proportion of biased stimuli appearing, and the proportion of standard stimuli appearing is always greater than that of biased stimuli; furthermore, the lower the user's cognitive level, the longer the duration of stimulus presentation; the types of biased stimuli are at least two, each type of biased stimulus corresponding to a specific behavioral response; all types of biased stimuli that the user needs to memorize, and the correspondence between each type of biased stimulus and the specific behavioral response, together constitute the second training parameters. The training unit is connected to the parameter configuration unit to configure a cognitive training task with a corresponding difficulty level and training duration for the user based on the first training parameter and the second training parameter; and pushes the cognitive training task to the user for cognitive training to simultaneously train the user's attention, inhibition and memory. A training feedback unit, connected to the training unit, is used to acquire the user's cognitive training data and provide feedback on the current cognitive training results to the user.

7. The fusion training system as described in claim 6, characterized in that... Also includes: A difficulty adjustment unit, connected to the training unit, dynamically adjusts the difficulty level of the next task trial based on the user's behavioral response data during cognitive training, by accumulating the number of correct answers or the number of incorrect answers.

8. A computer storage medium, characterized in that... It includes a processor and a memory, wherein the processor reads a computer program from the memory for implementing the fusion training method according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images