Whipping appliance

Abstract

The invention particularly relates to the technical field of household appliances, in particular to a whipping appliance, which comprises a cup body, a whipping device, a stirring device and a stirring device, and a cutter head is arranged at the bottom of the cup body; the first rib is arranged on the inner wall of the cup body in a surrounding mode in the vertical direction to form a spiral structure; the spiral structure extends downwards in a surrounding manner; the tool bit is at least partially accommodated in the spiral structure; the surrounding direction of the spiral structure from top to bottom is the same as the rotating direction of the tool bit. According to the embodiment, the first ribs are arranged, in the actual operation process, food material mixed liquid can rotate in the spiral structure, the spiral structure can guide the food material mixed liquid to flow downwards due to the fact that the spiral structure extends downwards in a surrounding mode, then centrifugal force can be counteracted, the surrounding liquid level height can be reduced, and the food material mixed liquid can be prevented from splashing while the food material mixed liquid is prevented from splashing. The food material particle circulation path length can be obviously reduced, the cutting frequency is improved, and then the stirring efficiency is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of household appliance technology, specifically to a whisking device. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, high-speed blenders are widely used in food processing for the efficient grinding and mixing of ingredients. During high-speed blending, the turbulence generated by the blades causes the food mixture to be subjected to centrifugal force, easily creating circulating vortices. This results in a higher liquid level at the edges of the mixture and a lower liquid level at the center of the vortex, and may even cause part of the blades to be exposed above the liquid surface.

[0003] Because the liquid level difference in the food mixture is too large during the mixing process, splashing of the food mixture is very likely to occur. At the same time, the circulation path is larger in the outer part of the vortex, which increases the mixing cycle and reduces the cutting frequency of food particles, thus affecting the cell wall breaking efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In view of this, this application provides a whisking appliance to solve the technical problem of excessive liquid level difference in the food mixture during the whisking process in the prior art.

[0005] In a first aspect, this application provides a whisking apparatus, which includes:

[0006] The cup body is equipped with a blade.

[0007] The first rib is arranged vertically around the inner wall of the cup, forming a spiral structure; the spiral structure extends downwards.

[0008] The cutting head is at least partially housed within the helical structure;

[0009] The spiral structure rotates in the same direction from top to bottom as the cutting head.

[0010] Beneficial effects: By setting the first rib, the food mixture will rotate in the spiral structure during actual operation. Since the spiral structure extends downward, it can guide the food mixture to flow downward, which is exactly opposite to the upward trend of the mixture. This can counteract centrifugal force, reduce the height of the liquid surface around the mixture, avoid splashing of the mixture, significantly reduce the circulation path length of the food particles, increase the cutting frequency, and thus improve the mixing efficiency.

[0011] In one alternative embodiment, the first rib extends in a direction close to the cutter head, and the side of the first rib close to the cutter head is a first sidewall, which slopes downward along the extension direction.

[0012] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the first sidewall is tilted downwards, which is exactly opposite to the upward movement of the mixture, thereby improving the direct counteracting effect of the ribs on the centrifugal force of the mixture. Furthermore, the tilted first sidewall can quickly guide the refluxed mixture to the vicinity of the blade head, reducing the obstruction of food particle flow and further shortening the cycle time.

[0013] In one alternative implementation, the first sidewall has a straight surface structure.

[0014] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the first sidewall is a straight structure, which can make the contact direction between the mixture and the rib clear, avoid the turbulence that may occur during the flow of the mixture, reduce the kinetic energy loss during the reflux process, and thus reduce the flow obstruction of food particles, further shortening the cycle.

[0015] In one alternative embodiment, the first sidewall is inclined downward at an angle of α, and 30° < α ≤ 90°.

[0016] Beneficial effects: This embodiment limits the downward tilt angle of the first sidewall to a certain range, ensuring sufficient downward guiding force while avoiding kinetic energy loss due to an excessively large angle. This ensures efficient reflux of the mixture and shortens the circulation cycle. If the angle is too small, the guiding force may be insufficient, failing to effectively counteract centrifugal force and guide reflux. If the angle is too large, the mixture may impact the ribs, resulting in significant kinetic energy loss.

[0017] In one alternative implementation, the first sidewall is a curved structure extending in a direction close to the cutter head.

[0018] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the first sidewall is designed as a curved structure. Compared to a straight structure, this allows for a smoother transition of the mixture when it comes into contact with the ribs, reducing kinetic energy loss caused by flow impact. Lower kinetic energy loss results in a faster return flow rate of the mixture, further shortening the food circulation cycle and improving the efficiency of cell wall breaking or mixing. Simultaneously, designing the first sidewall as a curved structure can further increase the capacity of the flow channel, thereby guiding more mixture to flow and improving mixing efficiency.

[0019] In one alternative implementation, the angle between the side of the curved structure closest to the cutter head and the vertical direction is β, and 30°<β≤90°.

[0020] Beneficial effects: This embodiment limits the angle between the curved surface structure and the vertical direction to a certain range, which can adapt to the flow guidance requirements of the curved surface structure. Within this range, the curved surface structure can provide sufficient downward guiding force while maintaining the smoothness of the mixture flow and reducing kinetic energy waste. If the angle is too small, the guiding force will be insufficient, and the mixture will not be able to be effectively guided to flow downwards. If the angle is too large, the flow of the mixture may be obstructed.

[0021] In one alternative embodiment, the side of the first rib away from the cutter head is the second sidewall, and the second sidewall slopes downward along the extending direction of the first rib.

[0022] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the second sidewall is tilted downward, which can increase the outlet width of the guide channel, allowing the mixture thrown against the cup wall by centrifugal force to enter the spiral channel more smoothly, or flow towards the center of the vortex of the mixture. Increasing the outlet width of the guide channel avoids flow congestion caused by an excessively narrow outlet, reduces the resistance of the mixture entering the channel, and reduces kinetic energy loss, thereby improving the smoothness and efficiency of the return flow, and thus improving the stirring efficiency.

[0023] In one alternative implementation, the inclination angle of the second sidewall is greater than that of the first sidewall.

[0024] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the inclination angle of the second sidewall is greater than that of the first sidewall, which can further expand the width of the guide channel outlet. At the same time, it matches the inclination angle of the first sidewall, making the path of the mixture from entering the flow channel to flowing out smoother, reducing the kinetic energy loss at the turning point, and making the reflux process more efficient.

[0025] In one alternative embodiment, when the first rib is provided in multiple layers, a flow channel is formed between the first ribs of adjacent layers, and the flow channel extends downward around the blade; the width of the flow channel gradually decreases along the direction close to the blade tip.

[0026] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the fluid kinetic energy is high near the cutter head, so the flow channel width gradually decreases, making the first ribs denser, which can fully guide the high-speed fluid. Simultaneously, it can also improve the ability to counteract centrifugal force. Furthermore, the fluid kinetic energy is low further away from the cutter head, and the flow channel is wider, thus avoiding kinetic energy loss caused by excessive flow guidance. Therefore, the flow channel layout in this embodiment can achieve graded flow guidance, allowing fluids at different heights to obtain suitable guidance effects, thereby improving the overall return flow efficiency.

[0027] In one alternative implementation, the flow channel includes a first flow channel and a second flow channel located in different layers, with the first flow channel being closer to the cutter head than the second flow channel; the width of the first flow channel is d1mm, the width of the second flow channel is d2mm, and 1≤d2 / d1<3.

[0028] Beneficial effects: This embodiment limits the ratio between the width of the first flow channel and the width of the second flow channel within a certain range. This corresponds to the kinetic energy difference between the high-speed fluid at the bottom and the low-speed fluid at the top, accurately matching the kinetic energy distribution of the fluid and avoiding insufficient or excessive flow, ensuring efficient circulation across the entire height range. If the ratio is too small, the upper flow channel will be too narrow, hindering the flow of low-speed fluid; if the ratio is too large, the bottom flow channel will be too wide, failing to adequately guide the high-speed fluid.

[0029] In one optional embodiment, when the first rib is surrounded by a single layer, such that the first end of the first rib does not coincide with the end of the first rib, a first line is formed between the first end and the center of the cup body, and a second line is formed between the end and the center of the cup body. The angle between the first line and the second line is γ, and 0°≤γ<180°.

[0030] Beneficial effects: This embodiment limits the angle between the first and second connecting lines to a certain range, which avoids insufficient flow coverage due to an excessively small angle, preventing the mixture from adequately guiding its return flow. It also prevents excessively large angles from causing overlap of the ribs or flow channel conflicts, thus affecting the flow of the mixture. Therefore, within this angle range, it ensures that a single layer of ribs provides sufficient flow coverage without conflict, guaranteeing return flow efficiency.

[0031] In one alternative embodiment, the agitator further includes:

[0032] At least one second rib is disposed on the inner wall of the cup body and located on the side of the first rib away from the blade; and the second rib extends in a vertical direction.

[0033] Beneficial effects: In this embodiment, the second rib is vertically positioned above the first rib. During actual operation, the first rib can guide the high-speed fluid at the bottom, thereby counteracting most of the centrifugal force. The low-speed fluid at the top, after being obstructed by the second rib, has insufficient remaining kinetic energy to generate splash and can quickly fall back to the cutter head. Therefore, the synergistic effect of the first and second ribs optimizes the flow state of the mixture inside the cup, reducing splashing while increasing the circulation frequency.

[0034] In one alternative implementation, the mixing appliance is one of a high-speed blender, a mixer, or a soymilk maker. Attached Figure Description

[0035] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the specific embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the specific embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without creative effort.

[0036] Figure 1 This is an overall sectional view of the agitator in the embodiments of this application;

[0037] Figure 2 This is a top view of the beating apparatus cup in the embodiments of this application;

[0038] Figure 3 for Figure 2A sectional perspective view at position AA.

[0039] Figure 4 for Figure 2 Sectional plan view at position AA;

[0040] Figure 5 for Figure 4 Enlarged view of part B when the first sidewall is a straight structure;

[0041] Figure 6 for Figure 4 Enlarged view of part B when the first sidewall is a curved structure;

[0042] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of a structure in an embodiment of this application where the first rib is provided in only one layer;

[0043] Figure 8 for Figure 7 The top view shown.

[0044] Explanation of reference numerals in the attached figures:

[0045] 10. Cup body;

[0046] 20. Blade tip;

[0047] 30. First rib; 31. First sidewall; 32. Second sidewall; 33. Flow channel; 34. Head end; 35. End end;

[0048] 40. Second rib. Detailed Implementation

[0049] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of this application clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this application, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0050] In the description of this application, it should be noted that the terms "inner," "upper," "outer," "lower," "underneath," etc., indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing this application and simplifying the description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore should not be construed as a limitation on this application. Furthermore, the terms "first," "second," and "third" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0051] In the description of this application, it should be noted that, unless otherwise expressly specified and limited, the terms "installation," "connection," and "communication" should be interpreted broadly. For example, they can refer to fixed communication, detachable communication, or integral communication; they can refer to mechanical communication or electrical communication; they can refer to direct connection or indirect connection through an intermediate medium; they can refer to communication within two components; and they can refer to wireless communication or wired communication. Those skilled in the art can understand the specific meaning of the above terms in this application based on the specific circumstances.

[0052] Currently, high-speed blenders are widely used in food processing for the efficient pulverization and mixing of ingredients. During high-speed blending, the turbulence generated by the blades 20 subjects the food mixture to centrifugal force, easily creating circulating vortices. This results in a higher liquid level at the edges of the mixture and a lower liquid level at the center of the vortex, sometimes even exposing parts of the blades 20 above the liquid surface. Because of this large drop in liquid level during blending, splashing of the food mixture is very likely to occur. Furthermore, the larger circulating flow path at the outer periphery of the vortex increases the blending cycle, reduces the cutting frequency of food particles, and consequently affects the blending efficiency.

[0053] In view of this, this application provides a whisking appliance to solve the technical problem of excessive liquid level difference in the food mixture during the whisking process in the prior art.

[0054] The following is combined Figures 1 to 8 This describes an embodiment of the present application.

[0055] like Figures 1 to 8 As shown in the embodiments of this application, in one aspect, this application provides a whisking appliance, which includes a cup body 10 and a first rib 30.

[0056] Specifically, in this embodiment, the cup body 10 is provided with a blade head 20. After the blender is started, the blade head 20 begins to rotate and blends the ingredients inside the cup body 10.

[0057] Furthermore, in this embodiment, the first rib 30 is vertically arranged around the inner wall of the cup body 10 to form a spiral structure, and the spiral structure extends downward, so that the blade 20 is at least partially accommodated in the spiral structure. Simultaneously, the spiral structure's downward spiral direction is the same as the rotation direction of the blade 20; for example, the spiral structure spirals clockwise and the blade 20 rotates clockwise; or the spiral structure spirals counterclockwise and the blade 20 rotates counterclockwise.

[0058] In this embodiment, the spiral structure can be one layer or multiple layers. Of course, this embodiment is merely an example of the number of layers in the spiral structure, and is not intended to limit it. Those skilled in the art can modify it according to actual circumstances, as long as the same technical effect is achieved.

[0059] With this configuration, in this embodiment, by setting the first rib 30, the food mixture will rotate in the spiral structure during actual operation. Since the spiral structure extends downwards, it can guide the food mixture to flow downwards, which is exactly opposite to the upward trend of the mixture. This can counteract centrifugal force, reduce the height of the liquid surface around the mixture, avoid splashing of the mixture, significantly reduce the circulation path length of the food particles, increase the cutting frequency, and thus improve the mixing efficiency.

[0060] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the first rib 30 extends in a direction close to the cutter head 20, and the side of the first rib 30 close to the cutter head 20 is a first sidewall 31, which slopes downward along the extending direction. That is, the lower surface of the first rib 30 is inclined toward the cutter head 20, and the angle of inclination is opposite to the upward movement trend of the mixture in the spiral motion.

[0061] With this configuration, the first sidewall 31 is tilted downwards in this embodiment, which is exactly opposite to the upward movement trend of the mixture, thereby improving the direct counteracting effect of the ribs on the centrifugal force of the mixture. Furthermore, the first sidewall 31 can guide the backflowing mixture quickly to the vicinity of the blade head 20 through its tilted guide, reducing the obstruction of food particle flow and further shortening the circulation cycle.

[0062] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the first sidewall 31 has a straight surface structure. That is, the cross-section of the lower surface of the first rib 30 on the central axis plane of the cup body 10 is a straight line with a certain downward tilt angle, and the tilt angle points to the position of the cutter head 20, which is opposite to the upward movement trend of the mixture in the spiral motion.

[0063] With this configuration, in this embodiment, the first sidewall 31 has a straight structure, which can make the contact direction between the mixture and the ribs clear, avoid the turbulence that may occur during the flow of the mixture, reduce the kinetic energy loss during the reflux process, and thus reduce the flow obstruction of food particles, further shortening the cycle.

[0064] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the first sidewall 31 is inclined downward at an angle of α, and 30° < α ≤ 90°.

[0065] By setting it up in this way, the downward tilt angle of the first sidewall 31 in this embodiment is limited to a certain range. This ensures sufficient downward guiding force while avoiding kinetic energy loss caused by an excessively large angle, thereby ensuring efficient reflux of the mixture and shortening the circulation cycle. If the angle is too small, the guiding force may be insufficient, failing to effectively counteract centrifugal force and guide reflux. If the angle is too large, the mixture may impact the ribs, resulting in significant kinetic energy loss.

[0066] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the first sidewall 31 is a curved structure extending in the direction close to the cutter head 20. That is, the lower surface of the first rib 30 has a cross-section on the central axis plane of the cup body 10 that is an arc with a certain downward bending angle, and the tail edge of the arc has an inclination angle with the vertical direction. The inclination angle points to the position of the cutter head 20, which is opposite to the upward movement trend of the mixture in the spiral motion.

[0067] With this configuration, the first sidewall 31 in this embodiment is designed as a curved structure. Compared to a straight structure, this allows for a smoother transition of the mixture when it comes into contact with the ribs, reducing kinetic energy loss caused by flow impact. Lower kinetic energy loss results in a faster return flow rate of the mixture, further shortening the food circulation cycle and improving the efficiency of cell wall breaking or mixing. At the same time, designing the first sidewall 31 as a curved structure can further increase the capacity of the flow channel 33, thereby guiding more mixture to flow and improving mixing efficiency.

[0068] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the angle between the side of the curved structure near the cutter head 20 and the vertical direction is β, and 30°<β≤90°.

[0069] By setting it up in this way, the angle between the curved surface structure and the vertical direction is limited to a certain range in this embodiment. This range can adapt to the flow guidance requirements of the curved surface structure. Within this range, the curved surface structure can provide sufficient downward guiding force while maintaining the smoothness of the mixture flow and reducing kinetic energy waste. If the angle is too small, the guiding force will be insufficient, and the mixture will not be able to be effectively guided to flow back downward. If the angle is too large, the flow of the mixture may be obstructed.

[0070] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the side of the first rib 30 away from the cutter head 20 is the second sidewall 32, and the second sidewall 32 is inclined downward along the extending direction of the first rib 30.

[0071] In other words, the upper surface of the first rib 30 is also inclined downwards. Furthermore, the upper surface of the first rib 30 cannot protrude upwards; its maximum limit is a planar structure.

[0072] With this configuration, the second sidewall 32 is tilted downwards in this embodiment, which can expand the outlet width of the guide channel, allowing the mixture thrown against the cup wall by centrifugal force to enter the spiral channel 33 more smoothly, or flow towards the center of the vortex of the mixture. Increasing the outlet width of the guide channel avoids flow congestion caused by an excessively narrow outlet, reduces the resistance of the mixture entering the channel 33, and reduces kinetic energy loss, thereby improving the smoothness and efficiency of the return flow, and thus improving the stirring efficiency.

[0073] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the tilt angle of the second sidewall 32 is greater than the tilt angle of the first sidewall 31.

[0074] With this configuration, the inclination angle of the second sidewall 32 is greater than that of the first sidewall 31 in this embodiment, which can further expand the width of the guide channel outlet. At the same time, it matches the inclination angle of the first sidewall 31, making the path of the mixture from entering the flow channel 33 to flowing out smoother, reducing the kinetic energy loss at the turning point, and making the reflux process more efficient.

[0075] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, when multiple layers of the first ribs 30 are arranged around the perimeter, a flow channel 33 is formed between two adjacent layers of the first ribs 30, and the flow channel 33 extends downwards around the perimeter. The width of the flow channel 33 gradually decreases along the direction approaching the cutter head 20. That is, in the vertical direction, the closer to the cutter head 20, the smaller the width of the flow channel 33, and the denser the arrangement of the first ribs 30. The farther away from the cutter head 20, the larger the width of the flow channel 33, and the sparser the arrangement of the first ribs 30.

[0076] In this configuration, the fluid kinetic energy is high near the cutter head 20, so the width of the flow channel 33 gradually decreases, making the first ribs 30 more dense, which can effectively guide the high-speed fluid. Simultaneously, it can also improve the ability to counteract centrifugal force. Furthermore, the fluid kinetic energy is low further away from the cutter head 20, and the flow channel 33 is wider, thus avoiding kinetic energy loss caused by excessive flow guidance. Therefore, the flow channel 33 layout in this embodiment can achieve graded flow guidance, allowing fluids at different heights to obtain suitable guidance effects, thereby improving the overall return flow efficiency.

[0077] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the flow channel 33 includes a first flow channel 33 and a second flow channel 33 located at different layers, with the first flow channel 33 being closer to the cutter head 20 than the second flow channel 33. The width of the first flow channel 33 is d1 mm, and the width of the second flow channel 33 is d2 mm, and 1 ≤ d2 / d1 < 3. That is, the first flow channel 33 is located below the second flow channel 33.

[0078] By setting it in this way, this embodiment limits the ratio between the width of the first flow channel 33 and the width of the second flow channel 33 to a certain range. This can correspond to the kinetic energy difference between the high-speed fluid at the bottom and the low-speed fluid at the top, accurately matching the kinetic energy distribution of the fluid, avoiding insufficient or excessive flow, and ensuring efficient circulation across the entire height range. If the ratio is too small, the upper flow channel 33 will be too narrow, hindering the flow of low-speed fluid; if the ratio is too large, the bottom flow channel 33 will be too wide, failing to adequately guide the high-speed fluid.

[0079] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, when the first rib 30 is surrounded by a single layer, such that the first end 34 and the last end 35 of the first rib 30 do not coincide, a first line is formed between the first end 34 and the center of the cup body 10, and a second line is formed between the last end 35 and the center of the cup body 10. The angle between the first line and the second line is γ, and 0°≤γ<180°.

[0080] By setting it up in this way, the angle between the first and second connecting lines in this embodiment is limited to a certain range. This avoids insufficient flow coverage due to an excessively small angle, which would prevent the mixture from flowing back in adequately. It also prevents the ribs from overlapping or the flow channels from interfering with each other due to an excessively large angle, thus affecting the flow of the mixture. Therefore, within this angle range, it can be ensured that the single layer of ribs provides sufficient flow coverage without conflict, thus guaranteeing the return flow efficiency.

[0081] Furthermore, in an optional embodiment, the mixing apparatus further includes at least one second rib 40 disposed on the inner wall of the cup body 10, located on the side of the first rib 30 away from the blade 20. The second rib 40 extends vertically. Of course, multiple second ribs 40 can be provided, with the multiple second ribs 40 evenly distributed on the inner wall of the cup body 10.

[0082] Furthermore, in this embodiment, during actual operation, the first rib 30 is located below and the second rib 40 is located above, respectively, and they turbulent the fluid in different ways at different spatial positions. The first rib 30 guides the high-speed fluid at the bottom, while the second rib 40 obstructs the low-speed fluid at the top.

[0083] During stirring, the fluid flows in a spiral. The fluid velocity is highest and the power is strongest on the lower side of the cup body 10 near the blade 20. A gentle spiral first rib 30 is used to guide the fluid in this part. Through the gradual guiding structure, the fluid's own power is used to change its direction. The kinetic energy loss is small, and the motor load will not be significantly increased. It can also increase the cutting frequency of the ingredients and improve the cell wall breaking efficiency.

[0084] The second rib 40 is perpendicular to the fluid flow direction, employing a direct flow-blocking turbulence method. If the second rib 40 extends to the high-speed fluid region at the bottom of the cup body 10, the high-energy fluid impacting the rib will cause significant kinetic energy loss, easily leading to splashing problems, increasing the motor load, and amplifying turbulence noise. Therefore, in this embodiment, the second rib 40 is arranged above the first rib 30. After being guided by the first rib 30 and having most of the centrifugal force canceled out, the fluid velocity is already very low. When the low-velocity fluid impacts the turbulence rib, the remaining kinetic energy is insufficient to generate enough centrifugal force to adhere to the wall, and it will quickly fall downwards without splashing.

[0085] In this configuration, the second rib 40 is vertically positioned above the first rib 30. During actual operation, the first rib 30 can guide the high-speed fluid in the lower part, thereby counteracting most of the centrifugal force. The low-speed fluid in the upper part, after being obstructed by the second rib 40, has insufficient remaining kinetic energy to generate splash and can quickly fall back to the cutter head 20. Therefore, the synergistic effect of the first rib 30 and the second rib 40 optimizes the flow state of the mixture inside the cup 10, reducing splashing while increasing the circulation frequency.

[0086] Furthermore, in one optional embodiment, the mixing appliance is one of a high-speed blender, a mixer, or a soymilk maker. Of course, this embodiment is merely an example illustrating the types of mixing appliances, and is not intended to limit the scope. Those skilled in the art can modify the appliance according to actual circumstances, as long as the same technical effect is achieved.

[0087] Although embodiments of this application have been described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art can make various modifications and variations without departing from the spirit and scope of this application, and all such modifications and variations fall within the scope defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A whipping appliance, characterized in that, The application relates to a beating appliance, which comprises: a cup body (10) provided with a cutter head (20); a first rib (30) arranged on the inner wall of the cup body (10) in a vertical direction to form a spiral structure, wherein the spiral structure extends downwards in a surrounding direction; the cutter head (20) is at least partially accommodated in the spiral structure; the surrounding direction of the spiral structure from top to bottom is the same as the rotating direction of the cutter head (20).

2. A whipping appliance according to claim 1, characterised in that The first rib (30) extends in a direction close to the cutter head (20), and one side of the first rib (30) close to the cutter head (20) is a first side wall (31) which inclines downwards along the extending direction.

3. A whipping appliance according to claim 2, characterised in that The first side wall (31) is a straight surface structure.

4. A whipping appliance according to claim 3, characterised in that The angle of the first side wall (31) inclining downwards is alpha, and 30 DEG < alpha <= 90 DEG.

5. A whipping appliance according to claim 2, characterised in that The first side wall (31) is a curved surface structure extending in a direction close to the cutter head (20).

6. A whipping appliance according to claim 5, characterised in that The angle between one side of the curved surface structure close to the cutter head (20) and the vertical direction is beta, and 30 DEG < alpha <= 90 DEG.

7. A whipping appliance according to any one of claims 2 to 6, characterised in that, The side of the first rib (30) far away from the cutter head (20) is a second side wall (32) which inclines downwards along the extending direction of the first rib (30).

8. A whipping appliance according to claim 7, characterised in that The inclination angle of the second side wall (32) is greater than that of the first side wall (31).

9. A whipping appliance according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that, When the first rib (30) is arranged in multiple layers in a surrounding manner, flow channels (33) are formed between the first ribs (30) of adjacent two layers, the flow channels (33) extend downwards in a surrounding manner, and the width of the flow channels (33) gradually decreases in a direction close to the cutter head (20).

10. A whipping appliance according to claim 9, characterised in that The flow channels (33) comprise first flow channels (33) and second flow channels (33) in different layers, the first flow channels (33) are closer to the cutter head (20) than the second flow channels (33), the width of the first flow channels (33) is d1 mm, the width of the second flow channels (33) is d2 mm, and 1 <= d2 / d1 < 3.

11. A whipping appliance according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that, When the first rib (30) is arranged in a single layer, and the first end (34) of the first rib (30) is not coincident with the tail end (35) of the first rib (30), a first connecting line is formed between the first end (34) and the center of the cup body (10), a second connecting line is formed between the tail end (35) and the center of the cup body (10), and the angle between the first connecting line and the second connecting line is gamma, and 0 DEG <= gamma < 180 DEG.

12. A whipping appliance according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that, The beating appliance further comprises: at least one second rib (40) arranged on the inner wall of the cup body (10) and located on the side of the first rib (30) far away from the cutter head (20), and the second rib (40) extends in a vertical direction.

13. A whipping appliance according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that, The beating appliance is one of a cell breaker, a blender and a soybean milk machine.

Images