Hydraulic engineering construction progress evaluation system

Abstract

The invention discloses a water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system, and relates to the technical field of water conservancy project management, and the system comprises an acquisition module, an association module, a comparison module and an output module, the acquisition module obtains actual progress data, construction plan data and environment data in a construction process, and transmits the data to the association module; analyzing the actual progress data, the construction plan data and the environment data, acquiring an analysis result, transmitting the analysis result to a comparison module, comparing the actual progress data with the construction plan data according to the analysis result, outputting a comparison result, transmitting the comparison result to an output module, evaluating the comparison result, and outputting an evaluation result. The method comprises the following steps: integrating actual construction progress, plan and environment data, constructing a correlation by means of process identification and time-space binding to distinguish environment and non-environment correlation type deviation, dynamically calculating a natural influence recovery period, and matching with a resource consumption efficiency coefficient evaluation benchmark, a linkage scheme library, key path check and a resource-progress matrix. And the problems of traditional data isolation and fuzzy attribution are solved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of water conservancy project management technology, and in particular to a water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system. Background Technology

[0002] In recent years, my country's water conservancy projects have entered a stage of large-scale and high-quality development. From major flood control and disaster reduction projects and inter-basin water transfer projects to basin ecological restoration projects, the scale of projects has continued to expand and the construction period has continued to extend. They generally face challenges such as complex construction environments, multiple overlapping operations, and large resource inputs. As a core link to ensure timely project delivery, control construction costs, and avoid safety risks, the need for technological upgrades in progress management is becoming increasingly urgent.

[0003] Current technologies related to water conservancy project schedule management still have several shortcomings: First, data integration is low. Existing systems often process actual progress data and construction plan data in isolation, failing to correlate environmental data with schedule fluctuations in time and space. This leads to ambiguity in the causal attribution of schedule deviations and makes it impossible to accurately distinguish between environmental force majeure impacts and non-environmental factors such as improper resource allocation and management oversights. Second, evaluation benchmarks are rigid. Most schemes use fixed schedule deviation thresholds and fail to dynamically adjust evaluation standards based on work process type and the degree of environmental anomalies, making it difficult to adapt to the phased characteristics of water conservancy projects. Third, response mechanisms are passive. Even when schedule deviations are identified, there is a lack of linkage with the historical expedited work plan database, and the critical path adaptability check or resource optimization allocation suggestions cannot be automatically triggered, resulting in low efficiency in deviation correction. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The technical problems addressed by this invention are as follows: Current technologies related to water conservancy project progress management still have several shortcomings: First, the data integration is low. Existing systems mostly process actual progress data and construction plan data in isolation, failing to correlate environmental data with progress fluctuations in time and space. This leads to ambiguity in the causal attribution of progress deviations and makes it impossible to accurately distinguish between environmental force majeure impacts and non-environmental factors such as improper resource allocation and management oversights. Second, the evaluation benchmarks are rigid. Most schemes use fixed time deviation thresholds and do not dynamically adjust the evaluation standards based on the type of work process and the degree of environmental anomalies, making it difficult to adapt to the phased characteristics of water conservancy projects. Third, the response mechanism is passive. Even if progress deviations are identified, there is a lack of linkage with the historical expedited work plan database, and the critical path adaptability check or resource optimization allocation suggestions cannot be automatically triggered, resulting in low efficiency in deviation correction.

[0005] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system includes a data acquisition module, an association module, a comparison module, and an output module;

[0006] The acquisition module is used to acquire actual progress data, construction plan data and environmental data during the construction process and transmit them to the associated module;

[0007] The association module is used to analyze the actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data, obtain the analysis results, and transmit them to the comparison module.

[0008] The comparison module is used to compare the actual progress data and the construction plan data according to the analysis results, output the comparison results, and transmit them to the output module.

[0009] The output module is used to evaluate the comparison results and output the evaluation results.

[0010] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the actual progress data includes the actual completed amount, actual time nodes and actual resource consumption.

[0011] The construction plan data includes the planned completion amount, planned time nodes, and planned resource allocation;

[0012] The planned time nodes include the planned start time and planned completion time of the process;

[0013] The environmental data includes meteorological data, hydrological data, and geological data.

[0014] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the analysis of the actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data to obtain analysis results specifically includes:

[0015] For the same process of a sub-item project, matching is performed based on the principle that the process identifiers are consistent and the progress parameter types correspond;

[0016] The process types are classified based on the attributes of the sub-items and process names, including earthwork excavation, concrete pouring, and rebar tying.

[0017] The process identification includes the sub-item project number, process name and unique number, construction area identification and construction location identification;

[0018] The types of progress parameters include actual completed amount, actual time nodes, actual resource consumption, planned completed amount, planned time nodes, and planned resource configuration;

[0019] The matching process filters out the actual completion amount and actual time node of the process marked in the actual progress data through process identifier, and matches them with the planned completion amount and planned time node marked with the same process identifier in the construction plan data according to parameter type, so as to form a one-to-one correspondence between the actual progress data and the construction plan data.

[0020] Then, taking the work process of each sub-item as the unit, the parts of the time-series synchronous sub-item are associated according to the principle of unique correspondence.

[0021] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the association includes binding the time period data that overlaps with the construction period of the process in the environmental data, the engineering part data that is consistent with the construction area of ​​the process, and the actual progress data of the corresponding process to generate a first analysis result.

[0022] The construction period of the process is determined by the actual time nodes in the actual progress data, and the actual time nodes include the actual start time and the actual completion time of the process.

[0023] The engineering location data refers to the information of specific construction locations of the associated sub-projects in the environmental data, specifically including the area number and location boundaries of the construction location.

[0024] The first analysis result includes the temporal correspondence between environmental data change characteristics and actual progress data fluctuations, and marks the abnormal segments of actual progress data when the environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold of the environmental data.

[0025] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, generating a second analysis result based on the first analysis result includes:

[0026] Extract the time range corresponding to the abnormal segments of environmental data in the first analysis result, and define it as the first time range;

[0027] Compare the first time range with the second time range;

[0028] The second time range is the time range within which the actual progress data and the construction plan data produce a progress difference;

[0029] If the first time range coincides with the second time range, the progress difference is marked as having a causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data;

[0030] If the first time range and the second time range do not overlap, the progress difference will be marked as having no causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data;

[0031] The second analysis result includes the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data, and distinguishes whether the progress difference is causally related to the environmental anomaly segment in the first analysis result;

[0032] The first analysis result and the second analysis result constitute the analysis result.

[0033] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the following is included: comparing the actual progress data and the construction plan data based on the analysis results, and outputting the comparison results:

[0034] For the same process of a sub-item project, based on the second analysis result in the analysis results, the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data is classified into environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations according to the type of deviation.

[0035] For the aforementioned environmentally correlated deviation, calculate the daily average deviation of the environmentally correlated deviation within the abnormal segment of the corresponding environmental data;

[0036] The average daily deviation is the difference between the actual completed amount and the planned completed amount divided by the number of days with abnormal environmental data.

[0037] For the non-environmentally related deviation, calculate the deviation ratio between the non-environmentally related deviation and the planned completion amount of the corresponding process. The deviation ratio is the non-environmentally related deviation divided by the planned completion amount of the corresponding process, and then multiplied by a fixed percentage value.

[0038] The process identifier, deviation type, daily average deviation amount, and deviation percentage are integrated to form and output the comparison results.

[0039] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, wherein: for the same process of sub-item project, dynamic evaluation benchmarks and linkage response mechanisms are set for environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations according to the type of deviation in the comparison results;

[0040] A dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism are set up for the aforementioned environmentally related deviations, specifically including:

[0041] Based on the extent to which the environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold of the environmental data in the first analysis result, if the extent is within the range of the first proportional threshold, then the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be a mild anomaly.

[0042] If the magnitude is greater than the second proportional threshold, the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be severe anomaly;

[0043] For the aforementioned minor anomaly, the natural impact recovery period of the environmental data is calculated based on the first numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process of the sub-item project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly.

[0044] For the severe anomaly, the natural impact recovery period of the environmental data is calculated based on the second numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process of the sub-project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly.

[0045] The standard operating period refers to the planned operating period of the process before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly, which is determined based on the technical standards of the sub-items of the project, construction conditions, and historical data of similar processes.

[0046] The average production capacity over a consecutive normal construction day is calculated from the actual progress data obtained by the data acquisition module.

[0047] If the daily average deviation of the same process of a sub-item project is less than or equal to the product of the average production capacity of b consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process of the sub-item project will be assessed as having controllable environmental impact, and associated with the environmental post-work rush plan library of similar processes in the past.

[0048] The statement that the environmental impact is controllable is classified as a Class I environmental impact assessment result.

[0049] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the solution library stores historical rush measures that match the process type and environmental data anomaly type;

[0050] If the daily average deviation of the same process in a sub-item project is greater than the product of the average production capacity of c consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process in the sub-item project will be assessed as requiring adjustment of the logic of subsequent processes, and the adaptive check of the critical path will be triggered simultaneously.

[0051] The logic for adjusting subsequent processes needs to be based on the second type of environmentally relevant assessment results.

[0052] The critical path refers to the longest construction path that consists of all critical processes and determines the total project duration.

[0053] The critical process refers to the process with a total float of d in the progress of the sub-item project. If the actual completion time of the process is delayed beyond the total float, the total project duration will be extended.

[0054] The total float refers to the process time buffer calculated based on the planned time nodes, and the calculation method is the latest completion time minus the earliest completion time;

[0055] The earliest completion time is the sum of the planned start time of the process and the standard operating period;

[0056] The latest completion time is the earliest start time of the next process immediately following the process. If the next process is a critical process, then the earliest start time of the critical process is the planned start time of the next critical process.

[0057] The adaptability check is performed by comparing the interval between the planned completion time of the same process in a sub-item project and the planned start time of the next process immediately following that process, and marking the names of compressible non-critical processes and their maximum compression limits.

[0058] The non-critical process refers to the process in the progress of the sub-item project where the total float is greater than e. If the actual completion time delay of the process is within the range of the total float, it will not affect the total project duration.

[0059] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, the system includes: setting a dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism for the non-environmentally related deviations, specifically including:

[0060] The benchmark is the floating range of the planned total construction period for the same process in a sub-item of the project;

[0061] The total planned duration is calculated by subtracting the planned start time from the planned completion time of each process.

[0062] The planned total construction period fluctuation range is set according to the allowable deviation range of the construction period stipulated in the industry standards and the contract;

[0063] The resource consumption efficiency coefficient is calculated synchronously by dividing the ratio of actual resource consumption to actual completed amount by the ratio of planned resource allocation to planned completed amount.

[0064] The actual resource consumption and actual completion amount are derived from the actual progress data obtained by the acquisition module, while the planned resource allocation and planned completion amount are derived from the construction plan data.

[0065] If the deviation ratio of the same process in a sub-item project is less than or equal to the upper limit of the planned total construction period fluctuation range, and the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is less than or equal to the first coefficient threshold, then the non-environmentally related deviation is assessed as a manageable deviation, and the manageable deviation is the first type of non-environmentally related assessment result.

[0066] As a preferred embodiment of the water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system of the present invention, if the deviation ratio of the same process of a sub-item project is greater than the upper limit of the planned total construction period fluctuation range, or the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is greater than the first coefficient threshold, then the non-environment-related deviation is evaluated as requiring optimization of resource allocation, and a resource-progress matching degree matrix is ​​generated.

[0067] The resource allocation that needs to be optimized is a non-environmentally related type II assessment result;

[0068] The resource-schedule matching matrix has the resource input increase on the horizontal axis and the expected schedule recovery rate on the vertical axis. The expected schedule recovery rate is determined based on the correlation data of resource input and schedule improvement of similar processes in history, and the optimal resource adjustment direction is marked.

[0069] The assessment results include environmentally relevant type I assessment results, environmentally relevant type II assessment results, non-environmentally relevant type I assessment results, and non-environmentally relevant type II assessment results.

[0070] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: By integrating actual progress, construction plans, and environmental data during the construction process, and establishing data associations based on the uniqueness of process identifiers and spatiotemporal binding, and by combining causal comparison to accurately distinguish between environmentally related and non-environmentally related deviations, this invention solves the problems of isolated data and ambiguous deviation attribution in traditional management. It dynamically calculates the natural impact recovery period based on the magnitude of environmental data anomalies, and constructs an evaluation benchmark by combining it with resource consumption efficiency coefficients. This adapts to the complex characteristics of water conservancy projects with multiple processes and environmental variables. By associating with a historical expedited construction plan library, triggering critical path adaptability checks, and generating a resource-schedule matching degree matrix, it establishes an active linkage response mechanism, shortening the decision-making time for corrective actions. This mechanism can be implemented throughout the entire construction cycle, reducing project delay rates and construction costs, and providing comprehensive technical support for on-time project delivery, cost control, and safety compliance. Attached Figure Description

[0071] Figure 1 This is a basic flowchart of a water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system provided in one embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0072] To make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, the specific embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments.

[0073] Example, refer to Figure 1 As an embodiment of the present invention, a water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system is provided, including a data acquisition module, a correlation module, a comparison module and an output module;

[0074] The data acquisition module is used to acquire actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data during the construction process and transmit them to the associated modules.

[0075] The correlation module is used to analyze actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data, obtain analysis results, and transmit them to the comparison module.

[0076] The comparison module is used to compare the actual progress data and the construction plan data based on the analysis results, output the comparison results, and transmit them to the output module.

[0077] The output module is used to compare and evaluate the results and output the evaluation results.

[0078] In one embodiment, the acquisition module, in conjunction with the data platform through an intelligent sensor network, captures real-time actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data during the construction process. This enables the instant aggregation and transmission of multi-dimensional information, providing a comprehensive and dynamic data source for subsequent analysis. The association module performs in-depth fusion analysis on the actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data, and outputs structured analysis results, laying the foundation for deviation tracing. It also intelligently compares the actual progress data with the planned data to generate comparison results. Based on the comparison results, it generates a visual evaluation report and simultaneously outputs targeted improvement suggestions, enabling full-process empowerment from data acquisition to decision support.

[0079] Actual progress data includes actual completed amount, actual time nodes, and actual resource consumption;

[0080] Construction plan data includes planned completion volume, planned time nodes, and planned resource allocation;

[0081] The planned timeline includes the planned start time and planned completion time of each process.

[0082] Environmental data includes meteorological data, hydrological data, and geological data.

[0083] Analyze actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data to obtain analysis results, specifically including:

[0084] For the same process of a sub-item project, matching is performed based on the principle that the process identifiers are consistent and the progress parameter types correspond;

[0085] The process types are classified based on the attributes of the sub-items and the process name, including earthwork excavation process, concrete pouring process and rebar tying process;

[0086] Work process identification includes the sub-item project number, work process name and unique number, construction area identification and construction location identification;

[0087] The types of schedule parameters include actual completed amount, actual time node, actual resource consumption, planned completed amount, planned time node, and planned resource allocation;

[0088] The matching process filters out the actual completion amount and actual time node of the marked process in the actual progress data through the process identifier. It then matches the planned completion amount and planned time node of the same process identifier in the construction plan data according to the parameter type, thus forming a one-to-one correspondence between the actual progress data and the construction plan data.

[0089] Then, taking the work process of each sub-item as the unit, the parts of the time-series synchronous sub-item are associated according to the principle of unique correspondence.

[0090] In one embodiment, the actual progress data includes the actual completed volume (e.g., the actual 520 m³ of concrete volume completed in the right bank dam section 2 concrete pouring process), the actual time nodes (e.g., the actual start date of the process on the 5th of the month and the actual completion date on the 16th of the month), and the actual resource consumption (e.g., the actual man-hours of 25 workers and the amount of 350 tons of cement used in the process). The construction plan data includes the planned completed volume (e.g., the planned 550 m³ of concrete volume to be completed in the concrete pouring process), the planned time nodes (e.g., the planned start date of the process on the 5th of the month and the planned completion date on the 14th of the month), and the planned resource allocation (e.g., the planned 22 workers and 4 concrete mixing equipment). The environmental data specifically includes the meteorological data of the construction area (e.g., the daily rainfall and wind speed from the 5th to the 16th of the month), the hydrological data (e.g., the average daily water level and flow velocity of the river section during the same period), and the geological data (e.g., the soil compaction and rock layer distribution of the pouring location).

[0091] When analyzing the above-mentioned actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data to obtain analysis results, the matching is first performed strictly according to the principle of "consistent process identification and corresponding progress parameter types" for the same process of sub-item projects (such as the main dam project): the process type is divided into three categories according to the sub-item project attributes and process name: earthwork excavation process, concrete pouring process, and rebar binding process. The process identification must be complete and include the sub-item project number (such as "dam-02"), process name and unique number (such as "concrete pouring-012"), construction area identification (such as "right bank") and construction location identification (such as "dam section 2"). The progress parameter type corresponds to the core indicators in the actual progress data and construction plan data, namely, actual completed quantity, actual time node, actual resource consumption and planned completed quantity, planned time node, and planned resource allocation. During the matching operation, the actual completion amount and actual time node of the process are first filtered out from the actual progress data by using the process identifier "Dam-02-Concrete Pouring-012-Right Bank-Dam Section 2". Then, the parameter types are matched one by one with the planned completion amount and planned time node corresponding to the same process identifier in the construction plan data to form a precise correspondence between the actual and planned data of the process. Subsequently, the association is completed by taking the process of the sub-item project as the unit, according to the principle of "time series synchronization + unique correspondence of sub-item project parts" (such as ensuring that the concrete pouring data of right bank dam section 2 during the period from the 5th to the 16th of the month is only associated with the planned data and environmental data of that time period and that part).

[0092] The association includes binding environmental data that overlaps with the construction period of the process, engineering part data that is consistent with the construction area of ​​the process, and the actual progress data of the corresponding process to generate the first analysis result;

[0093] The construction period of a process is determined by the actual time nodes in the actual progress data. The actual time nodes include the actual start time and the actual completion time of the process.

[0094] Engineering location data refers to the information of specific construction locations of the associated sub-projects in the environmental data, specifically including the area number and location boundaries of the construction location.

[0095] The first analysis results include the temporal correspondence between environmental data change characteristics and actual progress data fluctuations, and identify abnormal segments in the actual progress data when environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold.

[0096] In one embodiment, the association operation revolves around the precise matching of process and environmental data: First, the construction period of the process is determined, which is defined by the actual time nodes in the actual progress data (including the actual start time and actual completion time of the process). For example, if the actual start time of the concrete pouring process of the right bank dam section 2 is the 5th of the month and the actual completion time is the 16th of the month, then its construction period is from the 5th to the 16th of the month. The engineering part data is selected from the information of the specific construction part of the associated sub-item project in the environmental data, specifically including the area number of the construction part (such as "right bank-dam section"). 2) and location boundaries (such as "coordinates X120-Y350 to X150-Y380"), then filter environmental data: only extract data from time periods that overlap with the construction period of this process (such as daily rainfall from the 5th to the 16th of the month, and the average daily water level of the construction river section), as well as environmental information from environmental data that is consistent with the data of the engineering part (such as soil moisture data of the "right bank-dam section 2" area). Bind these filtered environmental data with the actual progress data of the corresponding process (such as the actual daily completion amount and actual working hours of this process) to generate the first analysis result. The first analysis result should clearly present the temporal correspondence between the characteristics of environmental data changes and the fluctuations in actual progress data (e.g., when the rainfall from the 5th to the 7th of the month is less than or equal to 20mm, the actual daily completion volume is stable at 50m³; when the rainfall from the 8th to the 9th of the month reaches 65mm (exceeding the construction allowable threshold of 50mm, which is set according to the technical requirement in the "Specifications for Concrete Construction of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Projects" (SL 176-2007) that "daily rainfall exceeding 50mm during concrete pouring is likely to cause surface segregation and a decrease in vibration effect"), the actual daily completion volume drops to 30m³). At the same time, the abnormal segments of the actual progress data when the environmental data exceeds the threshold should be clearly marked (e.g., the 8th and 9th of the month should be marked as the abnormal segment of the actual completion volume).

[0097] The second analysis result is generated based on the first analysis result, including:

[0098] Extract the time range corresponding to the abnormal segments of environmental data in the first analysis results, which is the first time range;

[0099] Compare the first time range with the second time range;

[0100] The second time frame is the time frame within which the actual progress data and the construction plan data produce a progress difference.

[0101] If the first time range and the second time range overlap, the progress difference will be marked as having a causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data;

[0102] If the first time range and the second time range do not overlap, the progress difference will be marked as having no causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data;

[0103] The second analysis results include the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data, and distinguish whether the progress difference is causally related to the environmental anomaly segment in the first analysis results;

[0104] The first and second analysis results constitute the analysis results.

[0105] In one embodiment, the operation is based on the first analysis results of the concrete pouring process of the right bank dam section 2 (planned daily completion volume of 50m³, set according to the "C30 concrete pouring daily average production capacity standard" in the construction plan of this process). First, the time range corresponding to the abnormal environmental data segment in the first analysis results (i.e., the first time range) is extracted. The first analysis results of this process show that the rainfall on the 8th and 9th of the month reached 65mm (exceeding the 50mm construction allowable threshold, according to the "Specification for Concrete Construction of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Projects" SL). (176-2007), therefore the first time range was determined to be the 8th-9th of the month. Subsequently, the second time range was determined, which is the period within which the actual progress data and the construction plan data show a progress difference. By comparing the actual daily completion volume and the planned completion volume (50m³ / day) of this process, it was found that the actual completion volume from the 8th to the 11th of the month was 30m³ / day, with a daily progress difference of 20m³ (50m³-30m³). Therefore, the second time range was set to the 8th-11th of the month. Then, the first time range (8th-9th) and the second time range (8th-11th) were compared: the time range of the 8th-9th overlapped. Therefore, the daily progress difference of 20m³ during this period is marked as "causally related to the environmental data anomaly segment (rainfall exceeding the threshold)". However, the time range of 10th-11th in the period of 9th-11th does not overlap (the rainfall during this period drops back to 25mm, and there is no environmental anomaly). Therefore, the daily progress difference of 20m³ during this period is marked as "not causally related to the environmental data anomaly segment". The final second analysis result includes the daily progress difference of 20m³ for this process from the 8th to the 11th of the month, and clearly distinguishes the causal relationship between the difference from the 8th to the 9th and the environmental anomaly, and the non-causal relationship between the difference from the 10th to the 11th and the environmental anomaly.

[0106] Based on the analysis results, the actual progress data and the construction plan data are compared, and the comparison results are output, including:

[0107] For the same process of a sub-item project, based on the second analysis result in the analysis results, the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data is classified into environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations according to the type of deviation.

[0108] For environmentally correlated biases, calculate the daily average bias within the abnormal segment of the corresponding environmental data;

[0109] The daily average deviation is the difference between the actual completed amount and the planned completed amount divided by the number of days with abnormal environmental data.

[0110] For non-environmentally related deviations, calculate the deviation ratio between the non-environmentally related deviation and the planned completion quantity of the corresponding process. The deviation ratio is the non-environmentally related deviation divided by the planned completion quantity of the corresponding process, and then multiplied by a fixed percentage value.

[0111] The process identification, deviation type, daily average deviation amount, and deviation percentage are integrated to form and output the comparison results.

[0112] In one embodiment, the "Dam-02-Concrete Pouring-012-Right Bank-Dam Section 2" process (planned daily completion of 50m³, set according to the daily average production capacity standard of C30 concrete pouring for this process) in the sub-item project is taken as the object. A comparison operation is carried out in conjunction with the second analysis result in the analysis results. First, based on the causal relationship between the progress difference and the environmental anomaly segment in the second analysis result, the progress difference of this process is divided into environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations. Among them, the 8th-9th of the month (environmental data anomaly segment, rainfall) The progress difference (20m³ per day) exceeding the allowable construction threshold of 50mm is classified as an environmentally related deviation. The progress difference (20m³ per day) for the 10th and 11th of the month (without environmental anomalies) is classified as a non-environmentally related deviation. Then, the daily average deviation is calculated for environmentally related deviations using the formula: "the difference between the actual completed amount and the planned completed amount divided by the number of days of environmental anomaly." In this case, the environmental anomaly period for this process is 2 days, with a daily difference of 20m³. Therefore, the daily average deviation is 20m³ ÷ 2 days = 10m³ / day. For non-environmentally related deviations... The deviation percentage is calculated using the formula: "Non-environmentally related deviation divided by the planned completion amount of the corresponding process, then multiplied by 100%". The fixed ratio is set to 100%, based on industry-standard percentage calculations. Multiplying by 100% converts the ratio of deviation to planned completion amount (in decimal form) into a straightforward percentage, conforming to the industry practice in water conservancy project progress assessment that "the deviation percentage must clearly reflect the relative difference." This facilitates construction management personnel in quickly identifying the severity of deviations (e.g., a 40% deviation percentage compared to 0%). The decimal form of .4 makes it easier to intuitively judge the impact of non-environmentally related deviations on the project schedule. Based on this, the deviation ratio is calculated to be 20m³÷50m³×100%=40%. Finally, the process identifier of the process ("Dam-02-Concrete Pouring-012-Right Bank-Dam Section 2"), deviation type (environmentally related deviation / non-environmentally related deviation), the daily average deviation of environmentally related deviation (10m³ / day) and the deviation ratio of non-environmentally related deviation (40%) are integrated to form and output a complete comparison result.

[0113] For the same process of a sub-item project, dynamic evaluation benchmarks and linkage response mechanisms are set for environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations based on the type of deviation in the comparison results.

[0114] For environmentally related deviations, dynamic evaluation benchmarks and linkage response mechanisms are established, specifically including:

[0115] Based on the extent to which the environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold in the first analysis results, if the extent is within the range of the first proportional threshold, the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be mild.

[0116] If the magnitude is greater than the second proportional threshold, the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be severe anomaly;

[0117] For minor anomalies, the natural recovery period of environmental data is calculated based on the first numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process in the sub-item project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly.

[0118] For severe anomalies, the natural impact recovery period of environmental data is calculated based on the second numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process in the sub-item project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly.

[0119] Standard operating period refers to the planned operating period of a process before the occurrence of abnormal environmental data, which is determined based on the technical standards of the sub-items of the project, construction conditions, and historical data of similar processes.

[0120] The average production capacity over a consecutive normal construction day is calculated from the actual progress data obtained by the data acquisition module.

[0121] If the daily average deviation of the same process of a sub-item project is less than or equal to the product of the average production capacity of b consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process of the sub-item project will be assessed as having controllable environmental impact, and will be associated with the environmental post-work rush plan library of similar processes in the past.

[0122] The environmental impact is controllable, which is classified as a Category I environmental impact assessment result.

[0123] In one embodiment, the "Dam-02-Concrete Pouring-012-Right Bank-Dam Section 2" process (planned daily completion volume 50m³, standard working period 10 days, this period is determined based on the C30 concrete pouring process requirements in the "Technical Specification for Concrete Construction of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering" SL 176-2007, the configuration of 3 on-site mixing equipment, and historical data of similar dam sections poured in the past 3 years) is taken as the object. A dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism are set according to the environmental correlation deviation (daily average deviation of 10m³ / day) in the comparison results. First, based on the first analysis results, the type of environmental data anomaly is determined. The environmental anomaly for this process is that the rainfall exceeds the construction allowable threshold (50mm, according to SL 176-2007). (As set in 176-2007), if the actual rainfall is 65mm (exceeding the threshold by 30%, falling within the 30%-60% range, the first proportional threshold range is set at 30%-60%, this range is set according to the water conservancy project environmental risk classification standard, and a slight anomaly corresponds to the scenario of "affecting construction but being mitigated by conventional measures"), then it is judged as a slight anomaly. The natural impact recovery period is calculated as 1.2 times the standard operation period (the first numerical threshold is set at 1.2 times, based on statistical data on the recovery efficiency of similar projects after environmental impact), i.e., 10 days × 1.2 = 12 days. If the actual rainfall is 90mm, exceeding the threshold by 80%, greater than 60% (the second proportional threshold is referenced from the "Water Conservancy Project Construction Risk Management Standard" SL), then it is considered a slight anomaly. According to the "Risk Classification of Construction Interruption Caused by Environmental Factors" in 721-2015, combined with the statistical data of construction accidents caused by rainfall exceeding the threshold in similar concrete pouring processes in the past 5 years, when the rainfall exceeds the allowable threshold by 60% or more, it will lead to irreversible construction problems such as formwork collapse and failure of initial concrete setting, which belongs to "severe risk requiring work stoppage and rectification". Therefore, 60% is set as the threshold value to distinguish between mild and severe anomalies, to ensure that the anomaly type judgment is accurately matched with the actual construction risk level. If it is a severe anomaly, the recovery period is calculated as 1.5 times the standard operation period (the second numerical threshold is set at 1.5 times, based on the actual measured data of process restart and efficiency recovery after severe anomalies), that is, 10 days × 1.5 = 15 days.

[0124] The average production capacity of three consecutive normal construction days (a=3, based on the conventional cycle of "three consecutive normal working days" in water conservancy project progress statistics) is calculated from the actual progress data before the abnormality obtained by the data acquisition module. The average daily production capacity of this process was 50m³ in the three consecutive normal construction days before the abnormality. Therefore, the average production capacity is 50m³ / day. If the average daily deviation of this process (10m³ / day) is less than or equal to the product of the average production capacity of three consecutive normal construction days (b=3, consistent with a, to ensure the consistency of statistical standards) and the number of days of natural impact recovery period (e.g., 50m³ / day × 12 days = 600m³ in the case of mild abnormality, 10m³ / day is less than or equal to 600m³), then the environmentally related deviation will be assessed as "environmentally controllable" (the first type of environmentally related assessment result), and the environmental post-work rush plan library of similar processes in history will be linked simultaneously.

[0125] The solution library stores historical expedited measures that match the process type and environmental data anomaly type;

[0126] If the daily average deviation of the same process in a sub-item project is greater than the product of the average production capacity of c consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process in the sub-item project will be assessed as requiring adjustment of the logic of subsequent processes, and the adaptive check of the critical path will be triggered simultaneously.

[0127] The logic for subsequent processes needs to be adjusted to reflect the second type of environmentally relevant assessment results.

[0128] The critical path is the longest construction path that consists of all critical processes and determines the total project duration.

[0129] A critical process is a process with a total float of d in the progress of a sub-item project. If the actual completion time of the process is delayed beyond the total float, the total project duration will be extended.

[0130] Total float refers to the time buffer for a process calculated based on the planned time nodes. It is calculated by subtracting the earliest completion time from the latest completion time.

[0131] The earliest completion time is the sum of the planned start time of the process and the standard operating period;

[0132] The latest completion time is the earliest start time of the next process immediately following the process. If the next process is a critical process, then the earliest start time of the critical process is the planned start time of the next critical process.

[0133] The adaptability check is performed by comparing the interval between the planned completion time of the same process in a sub-item project and the planned start time of the next process, and marking the names of compressible non-critical processes and their maximum compression limits.

[0134] Non-critical processes refer to processes whose total float is greater than e in the progress of sub-projects. If the actual completion time delay of a process is within the range of the total float, it will not affect the overall project duration.

[0135] In one embodiment, the expedited construction plan library stores historical measures that match "concrete pouring process + slight abnormal rainfall" (such as adding 1 mixing equipment or extending the working time by 2 hours / day). If the average daily deviation (e.g., assumed to be 70m³ / day) is greater than the product of the average production capacity of 3 consecutive normal construction days (c=3, same as the a / b setting logic) and the number of days of natural impact recovery period (50m³ / day × 12 days = 600m³, 70m³ / day is greater than 600m³), then it is assessed as "the logic of subsequent processes needs to be adjusted" (environmentally related type II assessment result), and the critical path adaptability check is triggered simultaneously.

[0136] The critical path refers to the longest construction path consisting of all critical processes (total float d=0, set according to the definition of "total float of critical processes is 0" in the "Construction Project Management Standard" GB / T 50326-2017). The "dam section maintenance process" that follows this process is a critical process (total float 0). Its earliest start time is the planned completion time of the concrete pouring process (16th of the month). The total float is calculated as "latest completion time - earliest completion time". The earliest completion time of the pouring process = planned start time (5th of the month) + standard operation period (10 days) = 15th of the month. The latest completion time = the earliest start time of the subsequent maintenance process (16th of the month). Therefore, the total float is 1 day. The adaptability check compares the planned completion time of the pouring process (16th of the month) with the planned start time of the subsequent curing process (16th of the month) to identify compressible non-critical processes (such as the preceding "rebar tying process", with a total float e=2 days, calculated and set according to the process logic relationship) and the maximum compression limit (1 day, based on the minimum operation time requirement of the process).

[0137] For non-environmentally related deviations, dynamic evaluation benchmarks and linkage response mechanisms are established, specifically including:

[0138] The benchmark is the floating range of the planned total construction period for the same process in a sub-item of the project;

[0139] The total planned duration is calculated by subtracting the planned start time from the planned completion time of each process.

[0140] The planned total construction period fluctuation range is set according to industry standards and the allowable deviation range for the construction period stipulated in the contract;

[0141] The resource consumption efficiency coefficient is calculated simultaneously by dividing the ratio of actual resource consumption to actual completed amount by the ratio of planned resource allocation to planned completed amount.

[0142] Actual resource consumption and actual completion amount are derived from actual progress data obtained by the acquisition module, while planned resource allocation and planned completion amount are derived from construction plan data.

[0143] If the deviation ratio of the same process in a sub-item project is less than or equal to the upper limit of the planned total construction period fluctuation range, and the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is less than or equal to the first coefficient threshold, then the non-environmentally related deviation will be assessed as a manageable deviation, and the manageable deviation will be the first type of non-environmentally related assessment result.

[0144] If the deviation ratio of the same process in a sub-item project is greater than the upper limit of the planned total duration fluctuation range, or the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is greater than the first coefficient threshold, then non-environment-related deviations will be assessed as requiring optimization of resource allocation, and a resource-schedule matching degree matrix will be generated.

[0145] Resource allocation needs to be optimized to achieve a non-environmentally related second-category assessment result;

[0146] The resource-schedule matching matrix has the horizontal axis representing the increase in resource input and the vertical axis representing the expected schedule recovery rate under the corresponding increase. The expected schedule recovery rate is determined based on the correlation data of resource input and schedule improvement of similar processes in history, and the optimal resource adjustment direction is also marked.

[0147] The assessment results include environmentally relevant Category I assessment results, environmentally relevant Category II assessment results, non-environmentally relevant Category I assessment results, and non-environmentally relevant Category II assessment results.

[0148] In one embodiment, the "Dam-02-Concrete Pouring-012-Right Bank-Dam Section 2" process in the sub-project (planned start time is the 5th of the month, planned completion time is the 14th of the month, planned completion volume is 500m³, planned resource allocation is 22 person-days / 500m³, set according to the C30 concrete pouring construction plan and resource allocation standards for this process) is taken as the object. A dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism are set for non-environmentally related deviations. First, the planned total construction period and the fluctuation range are determined. The planned total construction period is calculated as "planned completion time - planned start time", that is, the 14th of the month - the 5th of the month = 10 days. The upper limit of the fluctuation range of the planned total construction period is set at 5%. This setting is based on the technical requirement in the "Specification for Construction Organization Design of Water Conservancy Projects" SL 303-2017 that "the allowable range of non-environmentally related construction period deviations for concrete pouring processes is less than or equal to 5%", combined with the agreement in the construction contract that "non-environmentally induced construction period deviations must be controlled within 5% of the planned total construction period", to ensure that the benchmark is compliant and in line with the actual situation of the project. The resource consumption efficiency coefficient is calculated synchronously. This coefficient is calculated using the formula "(actual resource consumption / actual completed amount) ÷ (planned resource allocation / planned completed amount)". The actual resource consumption (25 person-days) and actual completed amount (480 m³) are obtained from the actual progress data collected by the acquisition module, while the planned resource allocation (22 person-days) and planned completed amount (500 m³) are obtained from the construction plan data. Substituting these values, we get (25 / 480) ÷ (22 / 500) ≈ 1.05. The first coefficient threshold is set to 1.1, based on the resource consumption of similar concrete pouring processes over the past three years. Efficiency statistics show that the resource efficiency coefficient of this type of process is generally less than or equal to 1.1 when it is operating normally. If it exceeds 1.1, it indicates that there is a waste of resources due to redundant personnel or idle equipment. Therefore, 1.1 is set as the critical value. Then, the non-environment-related deviation ratio of this process (4%, i.e. (500-480) / 500×100%) is used for evaluation. If the deviation ratio of 4% is less than or equal to the upper limit of the fluctuation range of 5%, and the resource consumption efficiency coefficient of 1.05 is less than or equal to 1.1, then the deviation is evaluated as "manageable deviation" (non-environment-related first type of evaluation result).

[0149] Synchronous linkage simplified management optimization schemes (such as fine-tuning construction personnel scheduling and optimizing the usage interval of mixing equipment) are used. If the actual deviation ratio of this process is 6% (greater than the 5% fluctuation limit) or the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is 1.2 (greater than 1.1), it is evaluated as "resource allocation needs optimization" (non-environment-related type II evaluation result), and a resource-schedule matching degree matrix is ​​generated. The horizontal axis of the matrix is ​​set as the increase in resource input (5%, 10%, 15%), and the vertical axis is the expected schedule recovery rate under the corresponding increase (8%, 15%, 18%). The expected schedule recovery rate is determined based on the historical correlation data of similar processes in the past 5 years, which shows that "when resource input increases by 10%, the schedule recovery rate reaches 15% and when input exceeds 15%, the recovery rate increase is less than 3%". At the same time, the optimal resource adjustment direction is marked (i.e., a 10% increase in resource input corresponds to an expected schedule recovery rate of 15%, which is the most cost-effective).

[0150] The final assessment results cover environmentally related first-class and second-class assessment results, as well as non-environmentally related first-class and second-class assessment results. This implementation method uses a dual-dimensional approach of "schedule deviation + resource efficiency" to avoid misjudgments caused by single-dimensional assessments, and provides a quantitative basis for resource optimization through the resource-schedule matrix, effectively improving the accuracy and economy of non-environmentally related deviation rectification.

[0151] This invention integrates actual progress, construction plans, and environmental data during the construction process. It establishes data associations based on the uniqueness of process identifiers and spatiotemporal binding, and accurately distinguishes between environmentally related and non-environmentally related deviations through causal comparison. This solves the problems of isolated data and ambiguous deviation attribution in traditional management. It dynamically calculates the natural impact recovery period based on the magnitude of environmental data anomalies and constructs an evaluation benchmark using resource consumption efficiency coefficients. Adapting to the complex characteristics of multiple processes and environmental variables in water conservancy projects, it establishes a proactive linkage response mechanism by associating with a historical expedited construction plan library, triggering critical path adaptability checks, and generating a resource-schedule matching degree matrix. This shortens the decision-making time for corrective actions and can be implemented throughout the entire construction cycle, reducing project delays and construction costs. It provides comprehensive technical support for on-time project delivery, cost control, and safety compliance.

[0152] Those skilled in the art will understand that embodiments of the present invention can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present invention can take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media containing computer-usable program code. The storage medium can be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM), Programmable Red-Only Memory (PROM), Read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic storage, flash memory, magnetic disk, or optical disk. These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable storage medium produce an article of manufacture including instruction means, which are implemented in a process Figure 1 One or more processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0153] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and are not intended to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, and all such modifications or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system, characterized in that, It includes a data acquisition module, a correlation module, a comparison module, and an output module; The acquisition module is used to acquire actual progress data, construction plan data and environmental data during the construction process and transmit them to the associated module; The association module is used to analyze the actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data, obtain the analysis results, and transmit them to the comparison module. The comparison module is used to compare the actual progress data and the construction plan data according to the analysis results, output the comparison results, and transmit them to the output module. The output module is used to evaluate the comparison results and output the evaluation results.

2. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 1, characterized in that: The actual progress data includes the actual amount completed, the actual time nodes, and the actual resource consumption. The construction plan data includes the planned completion amount, planned time nodes, and planned resource allocation; The planned time nodes include the planned start time and planned completion time of the process; The environmental data includes meteorological data, hydrological data, and geological data.

3. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The actual progress data, construction plan data, and environmental data are analyzed to obtain the analysis results, specifically including: For the same process of a sub-item project, matching is performed based on the principle that the process identifiers are consistent and the progress parameter types correspond; The process types are classified based on the attributes of the sub-items and process names, including earthwork excavation, concrete pouring, and rebar tying. The process identification includes the sub-item project number, process name and unique number, construction area identification and construction location identification; The types of progress parameters include actual completed amount, actual time nodes, actual resource consumption, planned completed amount, planned time nodes, and planned resource configuration; The matching process filters out the actual completion amount and actual time node of the process marked in the actual progress data through process identifier, and matches them with the planned completion amount and planned time node marked with the same process identifier in the construction plan data according to parameter type, so as to form a one-to-one correspondence between the actual progress data and the construction plan data. Then, taking the work process of each sub-item as the unit, the parts of the time-series synchronous sub-item are associated according to the principle of unique correspondence.

4. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 3, characterized in that: The association includes binding environmental data that overlaps with the construction period of the process, engineering part data that is consistent with the construction area of ​​the process, and the actual progress data of the corresponding process to generate the first analysis result. The construction period of the process is determined by the actual time nodes in the actual progress data, and the actual time nodes include the actual start time and the actual completion time of the process. The engineering location data refers to the information of specific construction locations of the associated sub-projects in the environmental data, specifically including the area number and location boundaries of the construction location. The first analysis result includes the temporal correspondence between environmental data change characteristics and actual progress data fluctuations, and marks the abnormal segments of actual progress data when the environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold of the environmental data.

5. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 4, characterized in that: The second analysis result is generated based on the first analysis result, including: Extract the time range corresponding to the abnormal segments of environmental data in the first analysis result, and define it as the first time range; Compare the first time range with the second time range; The second time range is the time range within which the actual progress data and the construction plan data produce a progress difference; If the first time range coincides with the second time range, the progress difference is marked as having a causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data; If the first time range and the second time range do not overlap, the progress difference will be marked as having no causal relationship with the abnormal segment of the environmental data; The second analysis result includes the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data, and distinguishes whether the progress difference is causally related to the environmental anomaly segment in the first analysis result; The first analysis result and the second analysis result constitute the analysis result.

6. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 5, characterized in that: Based on the analysis results, the actual progress data and the construction plan data are compared, and the comparison results are output, specifically including: For the same process of a sub-item project, based on the second analysis result in the analysis results, the progress difference between the actual progress data and the construction plan data is classified into environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations according to the type of deviation. For the aforementioned environmentally correlated deviation, calculate the daily average deviation of the environmentally correlated deviation within the abnormal segment of the corresponding environmental data; The average daily deviation is the difference between the actual completed amount and the planned completed amount divided by the number of days with abnormal environmental data. For the non-environmentally related deviation, calculate the deviation ratio between the non-environmentally related deviation and the planned completion amount of the corresponding process. The deviation ratio is the non-environmentally related deviation divided by the planned completion amount of the corresponding process, and then multiplied by a fixed percentage value. The process identifier, deviation type, daily average deviation amount, and deviation percentage are integrated to form and output the comparison results.

7. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 6, characterized in that: For the same process of a sub-item project, dynamic evaluation benchmarks and linkage response mechanisms are set for environmentally related deviations and non-environmentally related deviations based on the type of deviation in the comparison results. A dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism are set up for the aforementioned environmentally related deviations, specifically including: Based on the extent to which the environmental data exceeds the construction allowable threshold of the environmental data in the first analysis result, if the extent is within the range of the first proportional threshold, then the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be a mild anomaly. If the magnitude is greater than the second proportional threshold, the environmental data anomaly type is determined to be severe anomaly; For the aforementioned minor anomaly, the natural impact recovery period of the environmental data is calculated based on the first numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process of the sub-item project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly. For the severe anomaly, the natural impact recovery period of the environmental data is calculated based on the second numerical threshold of the standard operating period of the same process of the sub-project before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly. The standard operating period refers to the planned operating period of the process before the occurrence of the environmental data anomaly, which is determined based on the technical standards of the sub-items of the project, construction conditions, and historical data of similar processes. The average production capacity over a consecutive normal construction day is calculated from the actual progress data obtained by the data acquisition module. If the daily average deviation of the same process of a sub-item project is less than or equal to the product of the average production capacity of b consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process of the sub-item project will be assessed as having controllable environmental impact, and associated with the environmental post-work rush plan library of similar processes in the past. The statement that the environmental impact is controllable is classified as a Class I environmental impact assessment result.

8. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 7, characterized in that: The solution library stores historical expediting measures that match process types and environmental data anomaly types. If the daily average deviation of the same process in a sub-item project is greater than the product of the average production capacity of c consecutive normal construction days and the number of days of natural impact recovery period, then the environmentally related deviation of the same process in the sub-item project will be assessed as requiring adjustment of the logic of subsequent processes, and the adaptive check of the critical path will be triggered simultaneously. The logic for adjusting subsequent processes needs to be based on the second type of environmentally relevant assessment results. The critical path refers to the longest construction path that consists of all critical processes and determines the total project duration. The critical process refers to the process with a total float of d in the progress of the sub-item project. If the actual completion time of the process is delayed beyond the total float, the total project duration will be extended. The total float refers to the process time buffer calculated based on the planned time nodes, and the calculation method is the latest completion time minus the earliest completion time; The earliest completion time is the sum of the planned start time of the process and the standard operating period; The latest completion time is the earliest start time of the next process immediately following the process. If the next process is a critical process, then the earliest start time of the critical process is the planned start time of the next critical process. The adaptability check is performed by comparing the interval between the planned completion time of the same process in a sub-item project and the planned start time of the next process immediately following that process, and marking the names of compressible non-critical processes and their maximum compression limits. The non-critical process refers to the process in the progress of the sub-item project where the total float is greater than e. If the actual completion time delay of the process is within the range of the total float, it will not affect the total project duration.

9. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 8, characterized in that: For the aforementioned non-environmentally related deviations, a dynamic evaluation benchmark and linkage response mechanism are established, specifically including: The benchmark is the floating range of the planned total construction period for the same process in a sub-item of the project; The total planned duration is calculated by subtracting the planned start time from the planned completion time of each process. The planned total construction period fluctuation range is set according to the allowable deviation range of the construction period stipulated in the industry standards and the contract; The resource consumption efficiency coefficient is calculated synchronously by dividing the ratio of actual resource consumption to actual completed amount by the ratio of planned resource allocation to planned completed amount. The actual resource consumption and actual completion amount are derived from the actual progress data obtained by the acquisition module, while the planned resource allocation and planned completion amount are derived from the construction plan data. If the deviation ratio of the same process in a sub-item project is less than or equal to the upper limit of the planned total construction period fluctuation range, and the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is less than or equal to the first coefficient threshold, then the non-environmentally related deviation is assessed as a manageable deviation, and the manageable deviation is the first type of non-environmentally related assessment result.

10. The water conservancy project construction progress evaluation system as described in claim 9, characterized in that: If the deviation ratio of the same process in a sub-item project is greater than the upper limit of the planned total duration fluctuation range, or the resource consumption efficiency coefficient is greater than the first coefficient threshold, then the non-environment-related deviation is assessed as requiring optimization of resource allocation, and a resource-schedule matching degree matrix is ​​generated. The resource allocation that needs to be optimized is a non-environmentally related type II assessment result; The resource-schedule matching matrix has the resource input increase on the horizontal axis and the expected schedule recovery rate on the vertical axis. The expected schedule recovery rate is determined based on the correlation data of resource input and schedule improvement of similar processes in history, and the optimal resource adjustment direction is marked. The assessment results include environmentally relevant type I assessment results, environmentally relevant type II assessment results, non-environmentally relevant type I assessment results, and non-environmentally relevant type II assessment results.

Images