Data processing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment

Abstract

The invention discloses a data processing method and device, a storage medium and electronic equipment, and relates to the technical field of data processing. Processing the to-be-tested mail data by using a mail management system; based on the processing operation of the mail management system on the to-be-tested mail data, determining a mail processing capability parameter and a mail security performance parameter; and evaluating the mail management system according to the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter, and generating an evaluation result. Compared with the prior art, the method has the advantages that the overall management capability of the mail management system is comprehensively evaluated from multiple dimensions by collecting and analyzing the mail processing capability parameters and the mail safety performance parameters, so that the comprehensive efficiency of the mail management system in the running process is visually fed back; and a basis is provided for real-time monitoring and dynamic optimization of the system, so that the mail processing efficiency and the security protection capability are effectively improved.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a data processing method and device, a storage medium and an electronic device. BACKGROUND

[0002] With the continuous acceleration of enterprise informatization process, the mail system has become a key tool for internal communication and external contact of enterprises, and its intelligent level is directly related to the office efficiency and information security of enterprises. Enterprises need efficient and intelligent service management system to improve the efficiency and accuracy of mail processing and reduce operating costs. At the same time, in the face of the growing demand of users for efficient communication and personalized services, the mail intelligent service management system can provide more convenient and intelligent processing experience, effectively meeting the diversified application needs.

[0003] At present, the mail intelligent service management system usually introduces artificial intelligence, natural language processing and machine learning technologies to realize automatic classification, filtering, archiving and security protection of mails. However, the existing technology cannot intuitively reflect the comprehensive efficiency of the system in the actual operation of mail processing, and it is difficult to fully grasp the operation quality of the system, which has the risk of declining processing efficiency and weakening security protection capability. SUMMARY

[0004] Therefore, the present application provides a data processing method and device, a storage medium and an electronic device, which mainly aims to solve the technical problem that the current system cannot intuitively reflect the comprehensive efficiency of mail processing in the actual operation, it is difficult to fully grasp the operation quality of the system, and there is the risk of declining processing efficiency and weakening security protection capability.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a data processing method, comprising: obtaining test mail data; processing the test mail data by using a mail management system; determining a mail processing capability parameter and a mail security performance parameter based on the processing operation of the test mail data by the mail management system; evaluating the mail management system according to the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter, and generating an evaluation result.

[0006] In a second aspect, the present application provides a data processing device, comprising: an acquisition module configured to obtain test mail data; a processing module configured to process the test mail data by using a mail management system; a determination module configured to determine a mail processing capability parameter and a mail security performance parameter based on the processing operation of the test mail data by the mail management system; The evaluation module is configured to evaluate the mail management system according to the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter, and generate an evaluation result.

[0007] In a third aspect, the present application provides a computer readable storage medium, having stored thereon a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the first aspect.

[0008] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, comprising a storage medium, a processor, and a computer program stored on the storage medium and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method of the first aspect when executing the computer program.

[0009] In a fifth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product, having stored thereon a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the first aspect.

[0010] According to the above technical solution, the data processing method, device, storage medium and electronic device provided by the present application first acquire the to-be-tested mail data, then process the to-be-tested mail data by using the mail management system, and then determine the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter based on the processing operation of the mail management system on the to-be-tested mail data. According to the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter, the mail management system is evaluated, and an evaluation result is generated. Compared with the prior art, the present application can comprehensively evaluate the overall management capability of the mail management system from multiple dimensions by collecting and analyzing the mail processing capability parameter and the mail security performance parameter, can comprehensively and accurately reflect the actual performance of the system in terms of mail processing efficiency and security protection, and can further intuitively feedback the comprehensive performance of the mail management system in the running process, thereby providing a basis for real-time monitoring and dynamic optimization of the system, and effectively improving the efficiency and security protection capability of mail processing.

[0011] The above description is only a summary of the technical solutions of the present application. In order to more clearly understand the technical means of the present application, the content of the specification can be implemented, and in order to make the above and other purposes, features and advantages of the present application more obvious and easy to understand, the following specific embodiments of the present application are described. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0012] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into the specification and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the present application and, together with the specification, serve to explain the principles of the present application.

[0013] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0014] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a data processing method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 2 A flowchart illustrating another data processing method provided in an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 3 A flowchart illustrating an example provided in an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 4 A flowchart illustrating an example provided in an embodiment of this application is shown; Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the structure of a data processing apparatus provided in an embodiment of this application is shown. Detailed Implementation

[0015] The embodiments of this application will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that, unless otherwise specified, the embodiments and features described herein can be combined with each other.

[0016] To address the current technical problems of insufficient visual representation of a system's overall email processing performance during actual operation, difficulty in comprehensively understanding system operational quality, and risks such as decreased processing efficiency and weakened security capabilities, this embodiment provides a data processing method applicable to the management server or operation and maintenance monitoring platform within an intelligent email service management system. For example... Figure 1 As shown, the method includes: Step 101: Obtain the email data to be tested.

[0017] For example, a set of email samples for evaluating system performance can be imported from a preset test email set. Each email in the set is numbered sequentially to form a unique sequence of test email data, ensuring that subsequent processing operations and parameter collection are based on a unified and traceable data source to support continuous monitoring and quantitative analysis of the email management system's operating status.

[0018] Step 102: Process the email data to be tested using the email management system.

[0019] In some examples, the email management system may include an intelligent email service management system, which mainly includes modules for email filtering and classification, email archiving and backup, email approval and permission management, email search and indexing, and email statistics and reporting.

[0020] For example, the email filtering and classification module uses algorithms such as natural language processing and machine learning to automatically identify and filter unwanted emails such as spam and phishing emails, analyzes and judges email content, and achieves intelligent classification and filtering; the email archiving and backup module archives received emails to ensure the security and traceability of email data, provides backups to prevent data loss, and meets the enterprise's needs for long-term storage and retrieval of email data; the email approval and access control module approves sensitive or important documents to ensure the compliance and security of email content, provides flexible access control functions to meet the needs of different users, improves the security of email data, and prevents the leakage of sensitive information; the email search and indexing module provides efficient email search functions, supports full-text search and keyword search, and indexes emails to improve search speed and accuracy; the email statistics and reporting module performs statistical analysis on the usage of the email system, including indicators such as email sending and receiving volume, user activity, and spam interception rate. It also generates reports for administrators' reference.

[0021] In some examples, the process of processing email data to be tested by the email management system may include: receiving emails through email clients or web-based email services; detecting the types of received emails by building a spam detection model to help users automatically identify and handle spam; classifying filtered emails, automatically categorizing emails into corresponding folders according to user-defined rules, and backing up received emails; creating reply email templates, and setting email reminders and tracking based on the relevant content of received emails and user needs.

[0022] Step 103: Based on the processing operations of the email data to be tested in the email management system, determine the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters.

[0023] In some examples, email processing capability parameters may include spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters. Among them, spam filtering parameters include false negative rate and false positive rate, and email processing speed parameters include email processing speed.

[0024] In some examples, email backup capability parameters may include email backup data integrity. Email security performance parameters include antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters. Among them, antivirus capability parameters include virus detection rate, virus removal rate, and virus detection response time, while data encryption capability parameters include encryption key length, encryption coverage, encryption speed, and decryption speed.

[0025] Step 104: Evaluate the email management system based on email processing capacity parameters and email security performance parameters, and generate evaluation results.

[0026] In some examples, the overall management capability of the email management system can be quantitatively analyzed based on the collected email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters, generating email processing capability assessment values ​​and email security performance assessment values. The two assessment values ​​are then combined according to a preset ratio to obtain an email comprehensive management capability index that characterizes the overall effectiveness of the system. This index is compared with a preset multi-level assessment benchmark, and the management capability level of the system is determined according to the interval it is in. An assessment result containing parameter data, assessment values, comprehensive index, and level determination is generated, and the result is stored in a database or output to the management interface.

[0027] Compared with existing technologies, by applying the technical solution of this embodiment, and by collecting and analyzing email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters, the overall management capability of the email management system can be comprehensively evaluated from multiple dimensions. This can comprehensively and accurately reflect the actual performance of the system in terms of email processing efficiency and security protection, and thus intuitively reflect the comprehensive efficiency of the email management system during operation. This provides a basis for real-time monitoring and dynamic optimization of the system, thereby effectively improving email processing efficiency and security protection capabilities.

[0028] To further illustrate the specific implementation process of the method in this embodiment, this embodiment provides a method such as... Figure 2 The method shown includes: Step 201: Obtain the email data to be tested.

[0029] For example, emails in the test email set can be numbered sequentially according to a preset order, labeled 1, 2...n, to create a test email dataset with sequence identifiers. This dataset serves as input samples in the system evaluation process, used for subsequent unified processing and parameter collection within the email management system. This numbering mechanism ensures that each email has a unique and traceable identifier in the processing flow, facilitating accurate association of the corresponding processing behaviors and operating parameters during the data collection phase, thereby guaranteeing the completeness and correspondence of the acquired email management capability parameters.

[0030] Step 202: Process the email data to be tested using the email management system.

[0031] Optionally, step 202 may specifically include: using a spam detection model to identify and filter the email data to be tested, wherein the spam detection model is trained on preprocessed data using a machine learning algorithm; and classifying and backing up the identified and filtered email data to be tested based on the email management system.

[0032] For example, such as Figure 3 As shown, receiving emails via an email client or web-based email service serves as the initial step in the intelligent email service management system's processing flow. A built-in spam detection model identifies the types of received emails, enabling automatic detection and filtering of spam. After filtering, emails are automatically categorized into corresponding folders according to user-defined classification rules, and email backup operations are performed simultaneously to ensure data integrity. Based on the content of the received emails and the user's personalized needs, reusable reply email templates are generated, and corresponding email reminders and tracking mechanisms are set up to support timely responses and status monitoring for subsequent interactions.

[0033] In some examples, the process of building a spam detection model may include: first, collecting a large amount of sample data containing both legitimate and spam emails, and preprocessing this raw data. Specific operations include removing irrelevant characters and redundant information, text format normalization, word segmentation, part-of-speech tagging, and named entity recognition to improve the data's standardization and analyzability; then, extracting multi-dimensional features from the preprocessed email data, including text features based on the body content, behavioral features based on sending behavior and interaction patterns, and non-text features contained in images and attachments embedded in the email; based on this, using machine learning algorithms to train the labeled feature data, iteratively optimizing the model parameters, and finally generating a detection model that can automatically identify email types and determine whether they are spam.

[0034] Optionally, step 202 may further include: using the email management system to perform virus detection on the email data to be tested; and sequentially performing virus removal and encryption / decryption processing on the virus-detected email data to be tested.

[0035] For example, the system can identify potential malicious code or infection features by scanning the email body, attachments, and embedded content. After detecting a virus, the system performs virus removal on the infected email data, isolating or deleting malicious components to restore the email to a secure state. At the same time, during email transmission or storage, the system performs encryption on the detected email data to ensure the confidentiality of the information, and performs decryption when authorized access is granted to ensure the security and integrity of the data during transmission.

[0036] Step 203: Based on the processing operations of the email data to be tested in the email management system, determine the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters.

[0037] The email processing capability parameters include spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters, while the email security performance parameters include antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters.

[0038] Optionally, step 203 may specifically include: continuously collecting email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters of the email management system during the process of the email management system processing the email data to be tested.

[0039] For example, email processing capability parameters may include spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters. Spam filtering parameters include false negative rate and false positive rate, denoted as η. o and η f The email processing speed parameter includes email processing speed, denoted as v. h Email backup capability parameters include email backup data integrity, denoted as b; email security performance parameters may include antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters. Antivirus capability parameters include virus detection rate, virus removal rate, and virus detection response time, denoted as η respectively. d η p The data encryption capability parameters, including encryption key length, encryption coverage, encryption speed, and decryption speed, are denoted as L and t, respectively. a P c v e and v d .

[0040] Step 204: Analyze the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters respectively to obtain the email processing capability evaluation value and the email security performance evaluation value.

[0041] Optionally, step 204 may specifically include: weighting the spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters to obtain an email processing capability evaluation value; and weighting the antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters to obtain an email processing capability evaluation value.

[0042] In some examples, the email processing capability assessment value is calculated as shown in Formula 1: (Formula 1) In Formula 1, φ1 represents the email processing capability assessment value of the intelligent email service management system, and η o η represents the false negative rate of spam filtering by the intelligent email service management system. fv represents the false positive rate of the intelligent email service management system in filtering spam. hi b represents the speed at which the intelligent email service management system processes the i-th email. i δ represents the integrity of the i-th email backed up by the intelligent email service management system. δ1, δ2, δ3 and δ4 represent the influence coefficients of spam false alarm rate, spam false alarm rate, email processing speed and email backup data integrity on the email processing capability evaluation value, respectively.

[0043] In some examples, the email security performance evaluation value is calculated as shown in Formula 2: (Formula 2) In Formula 2, φ2 represents the email security performance evaluation value of the intelligent email service management system, and η d This represents the virus detection rate of the intelligent email service management system, specifically the proportion of infected emails to all infected software, η. p This represents the virus removal rate of the intelligent email service management system, specifically the percentage of emails that successfully remove viruses after detection. i L represents the virus detection response time for the intelligent email service management system to process the i-th email. a P represents the length of the email encryption key in the intelligent email service management system. c This indicates the encryption coverage of the intelligent email service management system, v ei v represents the encryption speed of the intelligent email service management system when processing the i-th email. di The decryption speed of the intelligent email service management system when processing the i-th email is represented by μ1, μ2, μ3, μ4, μ5, μ6 and μ7, which represent the influence coefficients of virus detection rate, virus removal rate, virus detection response time, encryption key length, encryption coverage, encryption speed and decryption speed on the email security performance evaluation value, respectively.

[0044] Step 205: Determine the comprehensive management capability index based on the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value.

[0045] Among them, the comprehensive management capability index is used to characterize the overall management capability of the email management system.

[0046] Optionally, step 205 may specifically include: calculating the comprehensive management capability index by combining the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value according to a preset ratio coefficient.

[0047] In some examples, the email comprehensive management capability index is calculated as shown in Formula 3: (Formula 3) φ represents the comprehensive email management capability index of the intelligent email service management system, where α1+α2=1 represents the ratio coefficients of the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value, respectively. φ1' represents the system preset standard value of the email processing capability assessment value, and φ2' represents the system preset standard value of the email security performance assessment value.

[0048] Step 206: Determine the evaluation results based on the comprehensive management capability index.

[0049] Optionally, step 206 may specifically include: determining the evaluation result by comparing the comprehensive management capability index with the preset evaluation index.

[0050] For example, the calculated comprehensive email management capability index is compared with the system's preset multi-level evaluation benchmark, which is divided into multiple level intervals and corresponding preset evaluation indices. The current management capability level of the email management system is determined by judging the specific interval in which the index is located. Based on the comparison results, corresponding judgment information is generated, including capability level identifiers and corresponding processing suggestions. The evaluation results are fed back to the intelligent email service management system in real time to support subsequent adjustment decisions.

[0051] Optionally, the above method compares the comprehensive management capability index with a preset evaluation index to determine the evaluation result. Specifically, this may include: if the comprehensive management capability index is less than the first evaluation index, the email management system is deemed to be in a seriously unqualified state; if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the first evaluation index and less than the second evaluation index, the system management capability is deemed to be in a state requiring improvement; if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the second evaluation index and less than the third evaluation index, the system management capability is deemed to be in a qualified state; and if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the third evaluation index, the system management capability is deemed to be in an excellent state.

[0052] For example, the evaluation index preset in the intelligent email service management system can be divided into three levels, namely the first evaluation index φ Ⅰ Second evaluation index φ Ⅱ and the third evaluation index φ Ⅲ When the comprehensive management capability index φ>φ Ⅲ When φ indicates that the email management system's overall email management capability index is greater than the third-level evaluation index, it means that the email management system's ability to manage emails is at an excellent level; when φ Ⅱ ≤φ≤φ Ⅲ When φ indicates that the email management capability index of the intelligent email service management system is greater than the second-level evaluation index and less than the third-level evaluation index, it means that the email management capability of the intelligent email service management system is at a qualified level and can be improved; when φⅠ ≤φ<φ Ⅱ When φ < φ, it indicates that the email management capability index of the intelligent email service management system is greater than the first-level evaluation index but less than the second-level evaluation index, meaning that the intelligent email service management system's ability to manage emails is unqualified and needs improvement; when φ < φ Ⅰ If the email management system's overall email management capability index is lower than the first-level evaluation index, it indicates that the system's ability to manage emails is seriously inadequate and requires immediate improvement.

[0053] For example, this embodiment constructs an email comprehensive management capability index to intuitively and accurately reflect the email management capability of the intelligent email service management system. By using a preset evaluation index of the email comprehensive management capability index and comparing it with evaluation indices of multiple levels, it determines whether the email management capability of the intelligent email service management system is qualified and whether adjustments and improvements are needed. This facilitates real-time monitoring and adjustment of the intelligent email service management system, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of email processing.

[0054] Optionally, the method in this embodiment may further include: generating a detection report based on email processing capability assessment value, email security performance assessment value, comprehensive management capability index, and assessment results.

[0055] For example, based on the collected email processing capability parameters, email security performance parameters, and the analyzed and processed email processing capability assessment values, email security performance assessment values, email comprehensive management capability index, and corresponding level determination results, a test report for the email intelligent service management system is generated. This report uses JMeter as the report generation tool, importing the aforementioned data stored in the email intelligent service management database into the tool. Utilizing its data parsing and templated output functions, it automatically integrates and generates a structured test report document. The report content includes test batch information, parameter statistical results, assessment values ​​for each dimension, comprehensive management capability index, and its level range. The generated test report is then pushed to the system management interface or sent to relevant operation and maintenance personnel so that they can understand the system's operating status and make corresponding decisions.

[0056] Optionally, the method in this embodiment may further include: storing email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters in an email management database; and adjusting the functions of the email management system based on the evaluation results of the email management system and the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters stored in the email management database in real time.

[0057] In some examples, all data, including the comprehensive management capability index, various sub-assessment values, raw parameters, and assessment results, can be synchronously written to the email intelligent service management database to ensure the traceability of the assessment process and the integrity of historical records.

[0058] For example, adjustments to the functions of the email management system can be made based on the evaluation results of the email management system and real-time feedback from the data stored in the email management database. This may include: conducting a comprehensive analysis based on the evaluation results of the intelligent email service management system and the historical and real-time data stored in the database to identify performance deviations or security weaknesses in areas such as spam filtering, virus detection, email classification, backup integrity, or encryption processing; generating feedback instructions based on the analysis results to dynamically adjust the operating parameters or policy rules of relevant functional modules, including but not limited to updating the feature weights of the spam detection model, optimizing the matching logic of classification rules, adjusting the detection frequency of virus scanning, or enhancing the execution strength of encryption algorithms, thereby achieving adaptive optimization and continuous improvement of system functions and enabling the system to maintain a relatively good operating state.

[0059] In some embodiments, such as Figure 4 As shown, the evaluation process of the intelligent email service management system is executed according to a preset sequence of steps: First, a batch of emails to be tested are numbered sequentially as 1, 2...n, and an intelligent email service management database is established to store relevant parameters, thereby achieving structured management of test data; then, during the system's processing of these emails, parameters related to email processing capabilities are continuously collected, such as spam false positive rate, false positive rate, email processing speed, and backup data integrity, as well as parameters related to email security performance, including virus detection rate, virus removal rate, virus detection response time, encryption key length, encryption coverage, and encryption / decryption speed, etc., and the collected data is written to the database in real time; then, the above two types of parameters are weighted separately. The system uses function operations to calculate email processing capability and email security performance assessment values. Based on these, the two assessment values ​​are combined according to a preset ratio to obtain an email comprehensive management capability index. This index is then compared with three preset assessment benchmarks to determine the current level of the system's management capability, and the judgment result is fed back to the system itself. At the same time, all calculation processes and judgment results are stored in the database for subsequent query and analysis. Finally, based on the collected raw data and the processed assessment index, an automated report generation tool is used to generate a complete intelligent email service management system test report. This report includes statistics of various parameters, assessment values, comprehensive index, and level judgment information to support system operation and maintenance and optimization decisions.

[0060] Compared to existing technologies, this embodiment comprehensively processes and analyzes data on spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, email backup capability parameters, antivirus capability parameters, and data encryption capability parameters to calculate email processing capability evaluation values ​​and email security performance evaluation values, resulting in an email comprehensive management capability index. By comparing this index with preset evaluation indices at multiple levels, the system determines the email management capability level of the intelligent email service management system. Based on the index level, the system is adjusted and improved, dynamically adjusting and optimizing specific functional modules such as the spam detection model, classification rule engine, virus scanning strategy, and encryption configuration to continuously enhance the management capabilities of the email management system. This embodiment, incorporating an evaluation and adjustment mechanism, enables enterprises to effectively improve email processing efficiency, ensure user information security, and optimize user experience. It also effectively enhances business continuity. Through email data analysis, the system provides enterprises with effective user behavior analysis, offering valuable data support for strategic decision-making.

[0061] Furthermore, as Figure 1 and Figure 2 To provide a specific implementation of the method shown, this embodiment offers a data processing device, such as... Figure 5 As shown, the device includes: an acquisition module 31, a processing module 32, a determination module 33, and an evaluation module 34.

[0062] Module 31 is configured to acquire data from the email to be tested. Processing module 32 is configured to process the email data to be tested using an email management system; The determination module 33 is configured to determine email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters based on the processing operations of the email management system on the email data to be tested. The evaluation module 34 is configured to evaluate the email management system based on the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters, and generate evaluation results.

[0063] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to analyze the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters respectively to obtain email processing capability evaluation values ​​and email security performance evaluation values; based on the email processing capability evaluation values ​​and the email security performance evaluation values, determine a comprehensive management capability index, which is used to characterize the overall management capability of the email management system; and determine the evaluation result based on the comprehensive management capability index.

[0064] Optionally, the email processing capability parameters include spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters; the email security performance parameters include antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters. Correspondingly, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to perform weighted processing on the spam filtering parameters, the email processing speed parameters, and the email backup capability parameters to obtain the email processing capability evaluation value; and to perform weighted processing on the antivirus capability parameters and the data encryption capability parameters to obtain the email processing capability evaluation value.

[0065] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to perform a comprehensive calculation on the email processing capability evaluation value and the email security performance evaluation value according to a preset ratio coefficient to obtain the comprehensive management capability index.

[0066] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to determine the evaluation result by comparing the comprehensive management capability index with a preset evaluation index.

[0067] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to determine that the management capability of the email management system is in a seriously unqualified state if the comprehensive management capability index is less than the first evaluation index; determine that the system management capability is in a state that needs improvement if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the first evaluation index and less than the second evaluation index; determine that the system management capability is in a qualified state if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the third evaluation index; and determine that the system management capability is in an excellent state if the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the third evaluation index.

[0068] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to generate a detection report based on the email processing capability evaluation value, the email security performance evaluation value, the comprehensive management capability index, and the evaluation result.

[0069] In some examples of this embodiment, the processing module 32 is specifically configured to identify and filter the email data to be tested using a spam detection model, wherein the spam detection model is trained on preprocessed data using a machine learning algorithm; and to classify and back up the identified and filtered email data to be tested based on the email management system.

[0070] In some examples of this embodiment, the processing module 32 is further configured to use the email management system to perform virus detection on the email data to be tested; and to perform virus removal and encryption / decryption processing on the email data to be tested after virus detection.

[0071] In some examples of this embodiment, the determining module 33 is specifically configured to continuously collect the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters of the email management system during the process of the email management system processing the email data to be tested.

[0072] In some examples of this embodiment, the evaluation module 34 is further configured to store the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters in the email management database; and to adjust the functions of the email management system based on the evaluation results of the email management system and the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters stored in the email management database in real time.

[0073] It should be noted that for other corresponding descriptions of the various functional units involved in the data processing apparatus provided in this embodiment, please refer to... Figure 1 and Figure 2 The corresponding description in [the document] will not be repeated here.

[0074] Based on the above, Figure 1 and Figure 2 Accordingly, this embodiment also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described method. Figure 1 and Figure 2 The method shown.

[0075] Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (such as CD-ROM, USB flash drive, mobile hard drive, etc.) and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (such as personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute the methods of various implementation scenarios of this application.

[0076] Based on the above, Figure 1 and Figure 2 The method shown, and Figure 5 To achieve the above objectives, the present application also provides an electronic device, such as a personal computer, server, laptop computer, intelligent robot, or other intelligent terminal, as illustrated in the virtual device embodiment. This device includes a storage medium and a processor; the storage medium stores a computer program; the processor executes the computer program to implement the above-described virtual device. Figure 1 and Figure 2 The method shown.

[0077] Optionally, the aforementioned physical devices may also include a user interface, a network interface, a camera, radio frequency (RF) circuitry, sensors, audio circuitry, a Wi-Fi module, etc. The user interface may include a display screen, input units such as a keyboard, etc., and optional user interfaces may also include USB interfaces, card reader interfaces, etc. The network interface may optionally include standard wired interfaces, wireless interfaces (such as Wi-Fi interfaces), etc.

[0078] Those skilled in the art will understand that the physical device structure provided in this embodiment does not constitute a limitation on the physical device, and may include more or fewer components, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0079] The storage medium may also include an operating system and a network communication module. The operating system is a program that manages the hardware and software resources of the aforementioned physical device, supporting the operation of information processing programs and other software and / or programs. The network communication module is used to enable communication between the various components within the storage medium, as well as communication with other hardware and software in the information processing physical device.

[0080] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that this application can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms, or it can be implemented by hardware. By applying the solution of this embodiment, compared with the existing technology, this embodiment continuously monitors and collects data on the processing of multiple numbered emails under test in the system, obtaining various operating parameters including spam filtering, processing speed, backup integrity, virus detection and removal, encryption and decryption, etc. It utilizes the statistical characteristics of batch data to reduce the evaluation bias caused by a single set of abnormal data, improving the stability and representativeness of the evaluation results. Based on this, the collected parameters are divided into two dimensions: email processing capability and email security performance, and weighted analysis and comprehensive calculation are performed respectively to form email processing capability evaluation values ​​and email security performance evaluation values, providing a basis for subsequent generation of comprehensive anti-fraud data. The system provides a data foundation for an email comprehensive management capability index that reflects the system's management efficiency. By constructing this comprehensive management capability index, multi-dimensional operational data is integrated into a quantifiable indicator, which is then compared with multiple preset evaluation indices. Based on the index's range, the system's overall management capability is graded, enabling a visual evaluation of the system's operational level. According to the evaluation results, the system automatically generates feedback instructions to dynamically adjust key functional modules such as the judgment threshold of the spam detection model, the matching logic of classification rules, virus scanning strategies, or encryption configurations, thereby promoting continuous system optimization and maintaining high processing accuracy and security protection capabilities.

[0081] It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are used merely to distinguish one entity or operation from another, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that includes said element.

[0082] The above description is merely a specific embodiment of this application, enabling those skilled in the art to understand or implement this application. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this application. Therefore, this application is not to be limited to the embodiments described herein, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features claimed herein.

Claims

1. A data processing method, characterized in that, include: Obtain the data of the email to be tested; The email data to be tested is processed using an email management system; Based on the processing operations of the email management system on the email data to be tested, determine the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters. The email management system is evaluated based on the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters, and an evaluation result is generated.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of evaluating the email management system based on the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters, and generating evaluation results, includes: The email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters are analyzed separately to obtain email processing capability evaluation values ​​and email security performance evaluation values. Based on the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value, a comprehensive management capability index is determined, which is used to characterize the overall management capability of the email management system. The evaluation result is determined based on the comprehensive management capability index.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The email processing capability parameters include spam filtering parameters, email processing speed parameters, and email backup capability parameters; the email security performance parameters include antivirus capability parameters and data encryption capability parameters. The analysis of the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters to obtain email processing capability evaluation values ​​and email security performance evaluation values ​​includes: The spam filtering parameters, the email processing speed parameters, and the email backup capability parameters are weighted to obtain the email processing capability evaluation value. The antivirus capability parameters and the data encryption capability parameters are weighted to obtain the email processing capability evaluation value.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The determination of the comprehensive management capability index based on the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value includes: The comprehensive management capability index is obtained by combining the email processing capability assessment value and the email security performance assessment value according to a preset ratio coefficient.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, Determining the evaluation result based on the comprehensive management capability index includes: The evaluation result is determined by comparing the comprehensive management capability index with the preset evaluation index.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The step of determining the evaluation result by comparing the comprehensive management capability index with a preset evaluation index includes: If the comprehensive management capability index is less than the first evaluation index, the management capability of the email management system is determined to be seriously unqualified. If the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the first evaluation index and less than the second evaluation index, then the system management capability is determined to be in a state that needs improvement. If the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the second evaluation index and less than the third evaluation index, then the system management capability is determined to be in a qualified state. If the comprehensive management capability index is greater than the third evaluation index, the system management capability is judged to be in an excellent state.

7. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 6, characterized in that, After determining the evaluation result based on the comprehensive management capability index, the method further includes: A detection report is generated based on the email processing capability assessment value, the email security performance assessment value, the comprehensive management capability index, and the assessment results.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of processing the email data to be tested using the email management system includes: The spam detection model is used to identify and filter the email data to be tested. The spam detection model is obtained by training the preprocessed data using machine learning algorithms. The email management system is used to classify and back up the identified and filtered email data to be tested.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of processing the email data to be tested using the email management system includes: The email management system is used to perform virus detection on the email data to be tested. The email data to be tested after virus detection is sequentially processed for virus removal and encryption / decryption.

10. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of determining email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters based on the processing operations of the email management system on the email data to be tested includes: During the process of the email management system processing the email data to be tested, the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters of the email management system are continuously collected.

11. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: The email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters are stored in the email management database; Based on the evaluation results of the email management system and the email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters stored in real time in the email management database, the functions of the email management system are adjusted.

12. A data processing apparatus, characterized in that, include: The acquisition module is configured to acquire data from the email to be tested. The processing module is configured to process the email data to be tested using the email management system; The determination module is configured to determine email processing capability parameters and email security performance parameters based on the processing operations of the email management system on the email data to be tested. The evaluation module is configured to evaluate the email management system based on the email processing capability parameters and the email security performance parameters, and generate evaluation results.

13. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the method of any one of claims 1 to 11.

14. An electronic device comprising a storage medium, a processor, and a computer program stored on the storage medium and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the method of any one of claims 1 to 11.

15. A computer program product having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program product is executed by a processor, it implements the method of any one of claims 1 to 11.

Images