Method for repairing myofascial using hand therapy with foot-controlled current

Abstract

This invention discloses a method for repairing myofascia using foot-controlled current and manual therapy. This invention relates to the field of bioelectric rehabilitation therapy technology, and includes steps S1 (preoperative circuit construction), S2 (full-area fascial palpation), S3 (multi-source data acquisition), S4 (transfer processing), S5 (data comprehensive calculation and analysis), and S6 (foot-controlled dynamic current synergistic manual repair). This invention uses foot-controlled current throughout the entire process, eliminating the need for hand operation. It simultaneously diagnoses and repairs myofascia through manual touch. A multi-parameter quantitative system is constructed through a fascial adhesion unit, making adhesion assessment objective and reproducible. The dynamic management unit integrates scoring and individual parameters to output the optimal current, incorporating conduction gain and resistance difference compensation. The foot-controlled adjustment unit outputs personalized pressure ranges, including manipulation rate compensation and habit adaptation, solving the problems of traditional assessments relying on experience and using coarse parameters.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of bioelectric rehabilitation therapy technology, specifically a method for repairing myofascia by using foot-controlled current with manual therapy. Background Technology

[0002] Myofascial pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder in clinical practice. Its core pathology lies in the formation of fibrosis and adhesions, trigger point nodules, and biomechanical chain imbalance in the fascial network due to chronic strain, postural compensation, or microtrauma, resulting in local pain, limited mobility, and compensatory symptoms in distal areas.

[0003] The current myofascial rehabilitation field mainly follows these approaches: I. In traditional manual myofascial release techniques, the practitioner relies on palpation with both hands to diagnose the condition and applies techniques such as dissection, peeling, and stretching to the adhered fascia to restore its sliding function. The advantage of this approach is its flexibility and the fact that it does not require equipment intervention, but it also has significant limitations: Deep, old adhesions are difficult to fully loosen by manual pressure alone. Technicians need to exert a lot of physical strength, and long-term operation can easily lead to hand strain. At the same time, the loosening effect is highly dependent on the technician's experience level, lacks objective quantitative standards, and the operation of different technicians varies greatly, making it difficult to standardize, replicate and promote. II. Bioelectric therapy technology applies pulsed currents of specific waveforms and frequencies to the human body through electrodes, utilizing the conduction effect of current in tissues to promote local blood circulation, relieve inflammation, and soften fibrotic tissue. However, existing electrotherapy methods generally have the following shortcomings: Firstly, the adjustment of current parameters relies on manual button or knob operation, which requires the practitioner to interrupt the manual operation when adjusting the parameters, resulting in an incoherent release process and affecting the overall therapeutic effect. Secondly, traditional pulse waveforms are mostly square waves or spike waves with sharp edges and strong stimulation. Charges are easily polarized and accumulated on the epidermis, causing discomfort such as stinging and burning sensations on the skin. They have a low degree of matching with the conduction law of the body's own bioelectric signals. Third, electrotherapy and manual techniques are often performed separately, making it impossible to adjust the current intensity in real time according to changes in the depth of lesions found during palpation. Diagnosis and repair cannot be synchronized, resulting in low treatment efficiency. Current techniques generally employ fixed current settings or experience-based coarse adjustments. The practitioner estimates the severity of adhesions based on their experience, selects a suitable current setting, and then fine-tunes it based on the patient's feedback during the procedure. The drawback of this method is that: Different practitioners may have significantly different judgments on the severity of the same lesion, resulting in inconsistent current settings. Individual differences among patients (skin resistance, tolerance, and site sensitivity) are not included in the parameter calculation, and there is a large deviation between the actual current applied to the lesion and the expected value. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a method for treating and repairing myofascia by manually controlling a foot-controlled current, thereby solving the problems mentioned in the background art.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides a method for repairing myofascia using foot-controlled electric current via manual therapy, comprising: Step S1, Preoperative circuit setup: The practitioner stands barefoot on the two pressure-sensitive conductive patches on the left and right of the foot control device, and the circuit electrode is attached to the back of the patient. After the device is turned on, the practitioner, the patient and the foot control device automatically form a closed bionic conductive circuit and the device enters standby mode. Step S2, Full-area fascial palpation: The practitioner uses both hands to touch the lesion site of the patient and explores the deep and superficial strain lesions, such as muscle stiffness, fascial band adhesions, trigger point nodules, interfascial edema, and mechanical chain compensation misalignment, in order to accurately locate the extent of adhesions. Step S3: Multi-source data acquisition: Based on the practitioner's full-area fascial palpation and the closed biomimetic conductive circuit formed in step S1, the data acquisition module acquires data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive electricity, and foot control pressure, and inputs the acquired data into the database. Step S4, Transfer Processing: The data transfer module retrieves data related to fascial adhesion, electrical adaptation, and foot pressure from the database and preprocesses the retrieved data. Step S5: Comprehensive Data Calculation and Analysis The integrated calculation module receives pre-processed data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive voltage, and foot pressure. After calculation and analysis, it outputs a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion, a personalized adaptive voltage baseline value, and a dynamic adjustment threshold range for foot pressure. Step S6: Foot-controlled dynamic current coordinated manual repair: The practitioner adjusts the current penetration intensity in real time steplessly by stepping on the lesion with both feet according to the depth of the lesion and the patient's tolerance. Combined with manual fascia manipulation techniques such as tendon manipulation, peeling, sliding, and stretching, the current is directionally conducted along the connective fascia through the skin contacted by the hands to soften fibrotic and hardened tissue and improve myofascial disorders. The foot control device automatically and collaboratively regulates the current based on the calculation results output by the comprehensive computing module.

[0006] Optionally, the specific operation process of the data comprehensive calculation and analysis in step S5 is as follows: Step S51: Based on the lesion extent coefficient, pain sensitivity coefficient, lesion depth coefficient, fascial dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, and adhesion tissue resonance offset rate in the fascial adhesion related data, and after weighting, a quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity is output. Step S52: Based on the patient's skin contact resistance, patient tolerance correction coefficient, site correction coefficient, biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient, technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient, conversion coefficient and correction benchmark coefficient in the data related to the adaptive voltage, and combined with the quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity, a personalized adaptive voltage benchmark value is output. Step S53: Based on the pressure-current conversion coefficient, manual operation dynamic rate compensation coefficient, and technician pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient in the foot control pressure related data, and combined with the quantified score of fascial adhesion severity and personalized adaptation voltage benchmark value, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure is output. The comprehensive calculation module used for data comprehensive calculation and analysis in step S5 includes a fascia adhesion unit, a dynamic management unit, and a foot control adjustment unit.

[0007] Optionally, the processing flow of the fascia adhesion unit is as follows: Step S511: Quantify the degree of adhesion spread by analyzing the extent of involvement of myofascial lesions, and output the lesion extent coefficient based on the operator's palpation assessment. Step S512: By analyzing the patient's pain tolerance to pressing the lesion site, the degree of stimulation of the surrounding nerves by the adhesion is reflected, and a pain sensitivity coefficient is output. Step S513: By analyzing the depth of the fascial layer where the adhesion lesion is located, the tissue thickness that the current needs to penetrate is quantified, and the lesion depth coefficient is output based on the operator's palpation and pressure assessment. Step S514: By analyzing the relative sliding ability of adjacent fascia layers during passive movement, data is acquired and calculated using an inertial sensor to obtain the fascia dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, thereby quantifying the degree of adhesion mechanical restraint. Step S515: Weight the output values ​​from the above steps and apply upper and lower thresholds to finally output a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion.

[0008] Optionally, the processing flow of the dynamic management unit is as follows: Step S521: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the extent, depth, pain, sliding ability, and degree of hardening of the adhesions can be reflected. Step S522: By analyzing the resistance value at the contact point between the patient's skin and the practitioner's hand, the degree of obstruction to the entry of current into the patient's body is reflected, so as to calculate the contact resistance of the patient's skin. Step S523: By analyzing the overall tolerance of the patient to the pulsed current, a patient tolerance correction coefficient is obtained to adapt to the differences in current sensitivity among different individuals. Step S524: By analyzing the effects of differences in fascia thickness and nerve distribution density in different body parts on current tolerance, a site correction coefficient is obtained; Step S525: By analyzing the conduction efficiency of biocurrent in the fascial tissue at the lesion site, the biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient is obtained to reflect the attenuation effect of fascial water content and fibrosis degree on the current. Step S526: By analyzing the difference between the practitioner's own body resistance and the reference resistance, the technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient is obtained, which is used to compensate for the influence of the practitioner's resistance fluctuation on the output current in the two-person closed circuit. Step S527: Convert the resistance value into the corresponding voltage compensation amount through the conversion coefficient, and then combine it with the correction reference coefficient to match the changes in current demand caused by the difference in tolerance, so as to finally output a personalized adaptive voltage reference value.

[0009] Optionally, the processing flow of the foot control adjustment unit is as follows: Step S531: By introducing a personalized adaptive voltage reference value, the overall range of the foot control pressure adjustment range is determined to ensure that the pressure change corresponds to a reasonable current change range when the practitioner steps on the pedal. Step S532: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the influence of adhesion status on the adjustment range is considered; Step S533: By analyzing the movement rate of the practitioner's hand movements, obtain the dynamic rate compensation coefficient of the manipulation operation, which is used to match the current requirements of different operation stages. Step S534: By analyzing the foot pressure habits of different practitioners, an adaptive coefficient for technician pressure adjustment habits is obtained to adapt to the operating preferences of different technicians. Combined with the current conversion coefficient, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure is finally output. Step S535: Based on the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure, the foot control device writes the threshold range into the pressure control module, and at this time the circuit enters the pressure follow-up controllable state.

[0010] Optionally, step S6 specifically includes: Based on the management module, when the practitioner's stepping force is lower than the minimum value of the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current output is 0 to avoid accidental activation. When the stepping force is within the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current changes linearly with the pressure. The current penetration depth can be steplessly adjusted by stepping lightly or heavily. When the stepping force exceeds the maximum value of the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current is maintained and no longer increases.

[0011] Optionally, step S6 further includes: Real-time resistance compensation: The foot control device re-collects the resistance of the practitioner and the patient every 2 seconds, dynamically updates the resistance difference compensation coefficient between the practitioner and the patient, and fine-tunes the current reference value to avoid current fluctuations caused by foot sweating and poor contact.

[0012] Optionally, step S7 is also included: consolidation of overall fascial chain mechanical balance, specifically: Consolidation operation: Maintain the personalized adaptive voltage reference value output for 3-5 minutes. The bioelectric field penetrates the whole body fascia network, repairs damaged fascia structure, relieves overall traction compensation, and restores the normal elasticity and biomechanical state of muscle fascia. Effect verification: After the operation is completed, the practitioner will perform the fascial sliding test again and recalculate the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue. If the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia increases by ≥30% compared with the preoperative value and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue decreases by ≥20% compared with the preoperative value, the release is deemed effective. If the standard is not met, the current reference value can be adjusted based on the current parameters for supplementary release. Data retention: The foot control device automatically retains all parameters, calculation results and effect data of this treatment, and automatically updates the patient's tolerance correction coefficient and the technician's pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient, so as to provide accurate parameter adaptation for the next treatment.

[0013] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: I. This invention employs full-process foot-controlled electricity, eliminating the need for hand-operated instruments. The technique is continuous and uninterrupted, resulting in higher treatment efficiency. Furthermore, it combines manual diagnosis with deep bioelectric myofascial repair, simultaneously improving both superficial and deep fascia. It is remarkably effective for myofascial strain and postural imbalances in the shoulders, neck, back, and other areas. This purely physical and non-invasive treatment method is drug-free and non-invasive, making it suitable for a wide range of users. It can be standardized and replicated in elderly care institutions, sports rehabilitation centers, rehabilitation departments, and medical institutions.

[0014] II. This invention constructs a multi-parameter quantitative scoring system through fascial adhesion units, encompassing multiple dimensions such as lesion extent coefficient, pain sensitivity coefficient, lesion depth coefficient, fascial dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, and adhesion tissue resonance offset rate. The fascial dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, by collecting displacement data during the practitioner's sliding operation, transforms the qualitative perception of sliding sensation in traditional palpation into a quantifiable value. The adhesion tissue resonance offset rate is detected by scanning microcurrent output from a foot control device, i.e., detecting the conduction characteristics of the lesion site to a specific frequency current, thereby presenting the degree of fibrosis and hardening of the deep fascia in the form of resonance frequency offset. The introduction of both enhances adhesion assessment from a single-dimensional tactile judgment to a multi-dimensional comprehensive quantitative assessment covering surface features and deep mechanical properties, making the assessment results objective and reproducible. This solves the problems of traditional assessment relying on experience and inconsistent standards, and provides a reliable decision-making basis for the subsequent personalized calculation of current parameters.

[0015] Third, this invention uses a dynamic management unit to integrate the scoring results of the fascial adhesion unit with the individual physiological parameters of the patient, and outputs the optimal current reference value adapted to the current lesion and the current individual. The biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient measures the actual attenuation of the current in the tissue by outputting a micro-probe current before treatment, so that the calculation of the current reference value is no longer based on the assumption of ideal tissue, but on the conduction characteristics of actual pathological tissue. The technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient incorporates the practitioner's own resistance fluctuation in the two-person closed loop into the calculation, eliminating the output deviation caused by only considering the patient's unilateral resistance in traditional technology. This unit enables the current reference value to simultaneously match the needs of multiple dimensions such as lesion severity, individual resistance characteristics, tissue conduction efficiency, site sensitivity, and overall loop status, minimizing the deviation between the output current and the actual needs, and solving the problems of coarse parameters and insufficient individual adaptability in traditional current setting methods.

[0016] IV. This invention, through the foot-controlled adjustment unit based on the calculation results of the fascia adhesion unit and the dynamic management unit, combined with the manual operation state and the practitioner's individual operating habits, outputs a personalized foot-controlled pressure adjustment range adapted to the current operation scenario. The manual operation dynamic rate compensation coefficient utilizes real-time acquisition of hand movement rate, enabling the foot-controlled range to automatically match the high current demand when the practitioner is performing deep static release, and automatically adapt to the low current demand when performing rapid relaxation operations, achieving natural synergy between manual techniques and foot control. The technician's pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient automatically calibrates the pressure range by recording historical operation data, allowing practitioners with different foot-stepping habits to complete fine current adjustment within a comfortable pressure range, reducing the adaptation cost and operational fatigue of foot control adjustment. This unit upgrades foot-controlled current adjustment from fixed mapping to dynamic personalized adaptation, solving the problems of fixed adjustment range and disconnect between manual techniques and foot control in traditional foot control technology. Attached Figure Description

[0017] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the integrated computing module of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a system module structure diagram of the present invention; Figure 3 This is a flowchart of the method steps of the present invention; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the specific process of step S5 of the present invention; Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the foot control device of the present invention.

[0018] In the diagram: 1. Foot control device; 2. Pressure-sensitive conductive patch; 3. Function button; 4. Adjustment knob; 5. Bioelectric interface; 6. Power interface. Detailed Implementation

[0019] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0020] Please see Figures 1 to 5 This embodiment provides a method for repairing myofascia using foot-controlled electric current via manual therapy, including: Step S1, Preoperative circuit setup: The practitioner stands barefoot on the two pressure-sensitive conductive patches 2 on the left and right sides of the foot control device 1, and the circuit electrode is attached to the back of the patient. After the device is turned on, the practitioner, the patient and the foot control device 1 automatically form a closed bionic conductive circuit and the device enters standby mode. Furthermore, in this embodiment, after multi-person real-person tolerance comparison tests, waveforms with sharp angle mutations, unidirectional DC, and easily polarized stimulation were eliminated. This embodiment selected a positive and negative bidirectional symmetrical waveform with a smooth and continuous curve and low frequency homogeneous biomimetic waveform. The waveform has no DC residue, good filtering, and no electrolytic burns, which promotes cells to reach the threshold, normal conduction of membrane potential ion movement, and high human compatibility. Step S2, Full-area fascial palpation: The practitioner uses both hands to touch the lesion site of the patient and explores the deep and superficial strain lesions, such as muscle stiffness, fascial band adhesions, trigger point nodules, interfascial edema, and mechanical chain compensation misalignment, in order to accurately locate the extent of adhesions. Step S3: Multi-source data acquisition: Based on the practitioner's full-area fascial palpation and the closed biomimetic conductive circuit formed in step S1, the data acquisition module acquires data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive electricity, and foot control pressure, and inputs the acquired data into the database. Step S4, Transfer Processing: The data transfer module retrieves data related to fascial adhesion, electrical adaptation, and foot pressure from the database and preprocesses the retrieved data. Step S5: Comprehensive Data Calculation and Analysis The integrated calculation module receives pre-processed data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive voltage, and foot pressure. After calculation and analysis, it outputs a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion, a personalized adaptive voltage baseline value, and a dynamic adjustment threshold range for foot pressure. The integrated calculation module includes a fascia adhesion unit, a dynamic management unit, and a foot control adjustment unit. Furthermore, the specific operational process of step S5, data comprehensive calculation and analysis, is as follows: Step S51: Based on the lesion extent coefficient, pain sensitivity coefficient, lesion depth coefficient, fascial dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, and adhesion tissue resonance offset rate in the fascial adhesion related data, and after weighting, a quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity is output. Step S52: Based on the patient's skin contact resistance, patient tolerance correction coefficient, site correction coefficient, biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient, technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient, conversion coefficient and correction benchmark coefficient in the data related to the adaptive voltage, and combined with the quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity, a personalized adaptive voltage benchmark value is output. Step S53: Based on the pressure-current conversion coefficient, manual operation dynamic rate compensation coefficient, and technician pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient in the foot control pressure related data, and combined with the quantified score of fascial adhesion severity and personalized adaptation voltage benchmark value, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure is output. Step S6: Foot-controlled dynamic current coordinated manual repair: The practitioner adjusts the current penetration intensity in real time steplessly by stepping on the lesion with both feet according to the depth of the lesion and the degree of tolerance. Combined with manual fascia manipulation techniques such as tendon manipulation, peeling, sliding and stretching, the current is directionally conducted along the connective fascia through the skin contacted by the hands to soften fibrotic hardened tissue and improve myofascial disorders. The foot control device 1 automatically and collaboratively controls the current based on the calculation results output by the comprehensive calculation module. Step S6 is as follows: Based on the management module, when the practitioner's stepping force is lower than the minimum value P of the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure...min When the current output is 0, to avoid accidental activation, the pedaling force is within the dynamic adjustment threshold range of the foot control pressure [P]. min P max Within the specified range, the current changes linearly with pressure, ranging from 0.6×IB to 1.4×IB. The current penetration depth can be steplessly adjusted by varying the pressure applied during pedaling. When the pedaling force exceeds the maximum value P of the dynamic adjustment threshold range for foot pressure, the current penetration depth will decrease. max At this time, the current remains at 1.4 × IB and does not increase further, ensuring safety; Step S6 also includes: Real-time resistance compensation: The foot control device 1 re-collects the resistance of the practitioner and the patient every 2 seconds, dynamically updates the resistance difference compensation coefficient between the technician and the patient, and fine-tunes the current reference value to avoid current fluctuations caused by foot sweating and poor contact. Step S7: Consolidate the overall fascial chain mechanical balance, specifically as follows: Consolidation operation: Maintain the personalized adaptive voltage reference value output for 3-5 minutes. The bioelectric field penetrates the whole body fascia network, repairs damaged fascia structure, relieves overall traction compensation, and restores the normal elasticity and biomechanical state of muscle fascia. Effect verification: After the operation is completed, the practitioner will perform the fascial sliding test again and recalculate the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue. If the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia increases by ≥30% compared with the preoperative value and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue decreases by ≥20% compared with the preoperative value, the release is deemed effective. If the standard is not met, the current reference value can be adjusted based on the current parameters for supplementary release. Data retention: Foot control device 1 automatically retains all parameters, calculation results and effect data of this treatment, and automatically updates the patient's tolerance correction coefficient and the technician's pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient, so as to provide accurate parameter adaptation for the next treatment. In this embodiment: Traditional methods may rely solely on the operator's subjective palpation to determine the degree of adhesion, and the assessment results are greatly influenced by personal experience. Furthermore, they cannot identify deep, hidden adhesions, the degree of fibrosis, or other characteristics that cannot be directly judged by touch. The three-unit assessment system integrates information from three dimensions: static lesion characteristics, dynamic physiological characteristics, and bioelectrical response characteristics. It not only covers the range, depth, and pain information obtainable by conventional palpation, but also obtains objective physiological indicators such as fascial sliding ability and the degree of fibrosis through non-invasive testing. It can obtain a unified and comprehensive assessment result of the severity of adhesion without relying on the operator's experience level, solving the problem of inconsistent assessment results for the same lesion by different operators, and providing an unbiased objective basis for all subsequent diagnostic and treatment steps. Traditional bioelectric therapy typically uses a fixed output current level, which cannot adapt to individual differences in skin resistance and fascial conduction characteristics among different patients, nor can it adapt to the differentiated energy needs of different lesion sites and severities. This can easily lead to problems such as insufficient current resulting in ineffective release, or excessive current causing skin irritation and tissue damage. The dynamic management unit takes adhesion assessment results as its core and integrates all variables that affect the actual current applied, such as individual patient tolerance, site characteristics, current conduction attenuation, and resistance fluctuations in the dual-circuit system. It dynamically calculates the optimal current benchmark value adapted to the current scenario, ensuring that the current intensity applied to the lesion site is sufficient to meet the release needs without exceeding the safety and tolerance range, thus avoiding the safety risks and uncertainty of effects associated with empirical current adjustment. The core of this method lies in the hand-controlled current, which frees up the hands and enables simultaneous palpation and repair. However, traditional foot-controlled devices with fixed pressure-current mapping relationships cannot adapt to the operating habits of different technicians, nor can they match the current requirements of different stages of the technique. This can easily lead to problems such as unsmooth operation and mismatch between current and technique. Based on the evaluation and calculation results of the first two sets, the foot-controlled adjustment unit automatically adjusts the width of the pressure adjustment range according to the severity of adhesion. When the adhesion is severe, the range is narrowed to avoid the risk of accidental touch, while when the adhesion is mild, the range is widened to improve the flexibility of operation. On the other hand, the range is automatically adjusted according to the speed of real-time technique operation to match the current requirements of different stages of the technique and adapt to the foot-stepping habits of different technicians. This allows the practitioner to naturally obtain the current intensity required for the current operation without having to deliberately adjust the foot-stepping force, completely eliminating the disconnect between foot-controlled operation and technique operation. This achieves an integrated treatment process where both hands can focus on palpation and release throughout the entire process, and the current automatically adapts to the operation requirements.

[0021] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 2 , Figure 3 and Figure 4 The treatment process for fascial adhesion units is as follows: Step S511: Quantify the degree of adhesion spread by analyzing the extent of involvement of myofascial lesions, and output the lesion extent coefficient based on the operator's palpation assessment. Step S512: By analyzing the patient's pain tolerance to pressing the lesion site, the degree of stimulation of the surrounding nerves by the adhesion is reflected, and a pain sensitivity coefficient is output. Step S513: By analyzing the depth of the fascial layer where the adhesion lesion is located, the tissue thickness that the current needs to penetrate is quantified, and the lesion depth coefficient is output based on the operator's palpation and pressure assessment. Step S514: By analyzing the relative sliding ability of adjacent fascia layers during passive movement, data is acquired and calculated using an inertial sensor to obtain the fascia dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, thereby quantifying the degree of adhesion mechanical restraint. Step S515: Weight the output values ​​from the above steps and apply upper and lower thresholds to finally output a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion. The calculation formula for the fascial adhesion unit is as follows: ; in: SC refers to the quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions. 0.2 (lower threshold): This is the lowest baseline score for myofascia in healthy individuals. Even without any adhesions, there may be slight slippage and resonance shifts due to individual differences. Setting this lower limit avoids insufficient current output due to excessively low scores, which would prevent the basic relaxation effect from being achieved. 1.5 (Upper Threshold): This is the highest score for the most severe myofascial adhesions observed clinically. Scores exceeding this value are considered abnormal measurement errors. Setting an upper limit prevents subsequent current calculations from exceeding the safe range. SCA refers to the lesion extent coefficient, which characterizes the extent of involvement of myofascial lesions. It is a direct quantification of the degree of adhesion spread and can be manually entered by the practitioner after palpation assessment. The lesion type is determined during palpation. In this embodiment, pre-assigned values ​​are used: 0.2 for single trigger point (diameter <1cm), 0.5 for local cord (length 1-3cm), and 1 for cross-regional fascial compensation (involving ≥2 muscle groups). The introduction of the lesion extent coefficient SCA directly determines the basic score of adhesion severity. The larger the extent, the wider the area that needs to be covered by the intervention. The baseline of the subsequent current intensity will be increased accordingly, avoiding the current acting only on the local area, which would lead to insufficient overall release effect. SCB stands for Pain Sensitivity Coefficient, which characterizes the patient's pain tolerance to pressure on the lesion site and reflects the degree of stimulation of the surrounding nerves by adhesions. Patients provide feedback based on the VAS pain score standard. The VAS score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most intense pain imaginable. SCB = VAS score ÷ 10, with a value range of 0.1-1. Since the more obvious the pain, the stronger the traction and inflammatory stimulation of the tissue by the adhesions, it is necessary to balance the loosening effect with the patient's tolerance when adjusting the current to avoid excessive current causing stinging or stress response. SCC refers to the lesion depth coefficient, which represents the depth of the fascial layer where the adhesion lesion is located. It reflects the tissue thickness that the current needs to penetrate. It can be entered by the operator through the depth perception of palpation and pressure. The superficial fascia (subcutaneous <0.5cm) corresponds to 0.3, the middle fascia (subcutaneous 0.5-2cm) corresponds to 0.7, and the deep fascia (subcutaneous >2cm) corresponds to 1.2. Because the deeper the depth, the more the current attenuates when penetrating the fat and muscle layers, the current benchmark value needs to be appropriately increased in subsequent calculations to ensure that sufficient current reaches the deep lesion site. SCD refers to the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of fascia, which characterizes the relative sliding ability of adjacent fascial layers during passive movement. It is a core dynamic indicator for judging the degree of mechanical binding of adhesions. It is collected by a miniature inertial sensor worn on the back of the practitioner's glove. When the practitioner palpates, they gently push the lesion site and make 1-2 lateral sliding movements. The sensor records the movement displacement of the hand and calculates the ratio with the standard sliding displacement of the healthy fascia in the same area. SCD = Measured relative sliding displacement of the fascia layer ÷ Reference value of normal fascia sliding displacement in the same location. The reference value is pre-built into the database and can be 0.2-1. Because the worse the sliding ability, the stronger the binding of the fibrous tissue to the fascia layer, a higher current intensity is needed to loosen the fibrous tissue. At the same time, the range of foot control adjustment will be appropriately narrowed to avoid tissue damage caused by sudden current changes. In normal myofascia, the relative sliding displacement of adjacent fascial layers is ≥2mm during muscle contraction. When adhesion occurs, the sliding displacement is significantly reduced. This parameter can be measured by a miniature inertial sensor worn on the operator's hand gloves (the data can be collected by gently shaking the lesion site during operation). It is an objective physiological indicator in the field of myofascial rehabilitation. SCE refers to the resonance offset rate of adhesion tissue, characterizing the degree of deviation between the inherent resonant frequency of the fascia at the lesion site and that of the healthy fascia. It reflects the degree of fibrosis and hardening of the fascia and can be calculated using the sweep frequency current generation module and current detection module built into the foot control device. During the palpation phase, the device outputs a sweep frequency microcurrent (current <1mA) of 10-60Hz. The peak current conductivity at different frequencies is detected to obtain the actual resonance frequency FAA, which is then compared with the built-in standard resonance frequency FAB of the healthy fascia at the same location. The value ranges from 0.1 to 0.4. The larger the offset rate, the more severe the fibrosis of the fascia and the worse the tissue elasticity. More precise current frequency and intensity need to be matched to avoid ineffective energy input, and at the same time, it provides a basis for the force adaptation of subsequent manual release techniques. The natural resonant frequency of normal myofascial tissue may be 20-50Hz, while the natural resonant frequency of myofascial tissue that has become adhered to will shift to a lower frequency by 10%-40% due to fibrosis and decreased elasticity. This parameter is the core objective indicator of the mechanical properties of myofascia. D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 refer to the weighted coefficients of lesion extent, pain sensitivity coefficient, lesion depth coefficient, fascial sliding coupling term, and resonance offset rate, respectively. They are used to reflect the contribution of different parameters to the severity of adhesion. They can be obtained through regression analysis of 300 clinical myofascial strain cases. The adhesion level assessed by palpation is used as the gold standard. Multiple linear regression is performed on each parameter to obtain the optimal weight value. In this embodiment, the preset values ​​of D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 are 0.25, 0.2, 0.2, 0.35, and 0.2, respectively. The weight setting is tilted towards dynamic objective indicators (fascial sliding and resonance offset) and reduces the proportion of subjective assessment parameters. In this embodiment: This fascial adhesion unit is the quantitative evaluation basis of the entire treatment method. It changes the traditional fascial release model that relies on the practitioner's subjective experience to judge the degree of adhesion. It unifies the scattered lesion characteristics and dynamic physiological indicators into calculable quantitative values, providing an objective decision basis for all subsequent current adjustment and pressure control. It avoids the difference in evaluation of the same lesion by different practitioners and is the core prerequisite for achieving standardized treatment. The calculated fascial adhesion severity score (SC) determines the energy input benchmark and operational risk level of the entire treatment process. It is the core input parameter for subsequent current benchmark value calculation and pressure adjustment range setting. It can automatically match subsequent treatment parameters without additional manual evaluation, thus avoiding the problem of undertreatment or overtreatment caused by empirical judgment from the root. The lower the metric score (SC) for the severity of fascial adhesions, the milder the adhesions. The subsequent current baseline will be set in a lower range, and the foot pressure adjustment range will be wider, allowing the practitioner more flexibility to adjust the current and adapt to the needs of superficial relaxation procedures. Conversely, the higher the metric score (SC), the more severe the adhesions. The subsequent current baseline will be set in a higher range, and the foot pressure adjustment range will be appropriately narrowed to avoid tissue damage caused by sudden current changes, while ensuring sufficient energy input to release deep adhesions.

[0022] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 2 , Figure 3 and Figure 4 The processing flow of the dynamic management unit is as follows: Step S521: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the extent, depth, pain, sliding ability, and degree of hardening of the adhesions can be reflected. Step S522: By analyzing the resistance value at the contact point between the patient's skin and the practitioner's hand, the degree of obstruction to the entry of current into the patient's body is reflected, so as to calculate the contact resistance of the patient's skin. Step S523: By analyzing the overall tolerance of the patient to the pulsed current, a patient tolerance correction coefficient is obtained to adapt to the differences in current sensitivity among different individuals. Step S524: By analyzing the effects of differences in fascia thickness and nerve distribution density in different body parts on current tolerance, a site correction coefficient is obtained; Step S525: By analyzing the conduction efficiency of biocurrent in the fascial tissue at the lesion site, the biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient is obtained to reflect the attenuation effect of fascial water content and fibrosis degree on the current. Step S526: By analyzing the difference between the practitioner's own body resistance and the reference resistance, the technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient is obtained, which is used to compensate for the influence of the practitioner's resistance fluctuation on the output current in the two-person closed circuit. Step S527: Convert the resistance value into the corresponding voltage compensation amount through the conversion coefficient, and then combine it with the correction reference coefficient to match the changes in current demand caused by the difference in tolerance, so as to finally output a personalized adaptation voltage reference value. The calculation formula for the dynamic management unit is as follows: ; in: IB refers to the Personalized Adaptive Voltage Reference Value; 0.5V (lower threshold): This is the lowest bio-current voltage value that the human body can perceive. Current below this value cannot play any role in relieving the problem. Setting a lower threshold avoids meaningless low current output. 36V (upper limit threshold): This is the upper limit of the safe voltage for medical equipment to come into contact with the human body. Exceeding this value poses a risk of electric shock. Setting an upper limit strictly ensures electrical safety during the treatment process. The introduction of the fascial adhesion severity quantification score (SC) comprehensively reflects the extent, depth, pain, sliding ability, and hardening degree of adhesion. As the core input for calculating the current benchmark value, the more severe the adhesion, the higher the benchmark current, ensuring that the energy input matches the severity of the lesion and avoiding insufficient energy leading to poor release effect, or excessive energy leading to damage to normal tissue. IBA refers to the skin contact resistance of the patient, which characterizes the resistance value at the point of contact between the patient's skin and the practitioner's hand. It reflects the degree of obstruction to the entry of current into the patient's body and can be measured in real time through the human body resistance detection module built into the foot control device. Before the treatment begins, the device outputs a micro detection current of 1kHz and calculates the resistance value by the voltage-to-current ratio of the closed loop. The unit is kΩ, and the normal range is 10-100kΩ. Because the higher the skin resistance, the smaller the actual current under the same output voltage, this parameter is needed to compensate for the current attenuation caused by the resistance to ensure that the actual current intensity reaching the lesion meets the preset requirements. IBB stands for Subject Tolerance Correction Factor, which characterizes the subject's overall tolerance to pulsed current. It adapts to the differences in current sensitivity among different individuals and can be manually set by the practitioner based on the number of treatments and feedback from the subject. The default value for the first treatment is 0.7, and it is gradually increased in subsequent treatments based on the subject's tolerance feedback, with a maximum of 1.3. For first-time treatments or subjects with high current sensitivity, the base current should be appropriately reduced to avoid discomfort during the first treatment. For subjects with multiple treatments, the upper limit of the current should be gradually increased to ensure that the release effect is enhanced as tolerance increases. IBC refers to the site correction factor, which characterizes the impact of differences in fascia thickness and nerve distribution density in different body parts on current tolerance. After the practitioner selects the treatment site, the corresponding value in the built-in database is automatically called. Sensitive areas such as the neck, shoulders and face correspond to 0.6, the waist, abdomen and limbs correspond to 0.9, and the back and buttocks correspond to 1.1. For sensitive areas with dense nerve distribution, the reference current is appropriately reduced to avoid discomfort caused by current stimulation. For areas with high tolerance, the reference current is appropriately increased to ensure sufficient energy to penetrate thick muscles and fascia. IBD refers to the biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient, which characterizes the conduction efficiency of biocurrent in the fascial tissue at the lesion site. It reflects the attenuation effect of fascial water content and fibrosis on the current. It can be calculated by the current detection module built into the foot control device. Before formal treatment, the device outputs a micro probe current of 10mA and measures the current amplitude at the device output end and the current amplitude at the lesion end of the patient. The ratio is IBD = measured current amplitude at the lesion end of the patient ÷ current amplitude at the device output end, with a value range of 0.4-1.2. The lower the conduction gain, the more the current is attenuated in the fascial tissue. It is necessary to increase the output voltage to compensate for the attenuation and ensure that the current intensity actually applied to the adhesion site meets the treatment requirements, so as to avoid the energy being absorbed by the upper tissue and resulting in insufficient energy at the lesion site. The conduction efficiency of biocurrents of different frequencies in fascial tissues varies significantly and is positively correlated with fascial water content. This parameter is measured by the micro-probe current output by the device before formal treatment. Existing technologies usually assume that the current conduction efficiency is a fixed value and do not dynamically adjust it according to the individual fascial condition. IBE refers to the technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient, which represents the difference between the technician's own body resistance and the reference resistance. It compensates for the influence of technician resistance fluctuations on the output current in a two-person closed loop. The technician's real-time body resistance IBEA and the reference resistance IBEB (which can be preset to 50kΩ) can be measured separately through the resistance detection module built into the foot control device. IBE = (IBEA - IBEB) ÷ IBEB, and the value range is limited to -0.3 to 0.3. This is because when the technician's own resistance fluctuates due to factors such as foot sweating and changes in standing pressure, this coefficient dynamically compensates for the change in the total resistance of the loop, avoiding deviations in the actual output current and ensuring that the current intensity remains stable within the preset range. This method is a two-person closed circuit (the current passes through both the technician and the patient simultaneously). Traditional electrotherapy only measures the patient's resistance, ignoring the fluctuations in the technician's own resistance (such as changes in resistance caused by sweating on the technician's feet or changes in standing pressure). This can lead to a 15%-30% deviation in the actual current applied to the patient. This parameter is calculated by the device in real time by collecting the resistance difference between the technician and the patient. L1 refers to the conversion coefficient. In this embodiment, L1 is preset to 0.02V / kΩ, which is the amount by which the output voltage needs to be increased when the skin resistance increases by 1kΩ. It is used to convert the resistance value into the corresponding voltage compensation amount. It can be determined based on basic experiments on human body resistance and current conduction. When the circuit resistance changes by 1kΩ, a voltage increase of 0.02V can ensure that the actual current is stable in the safe and effective range of 0.1-0.5mA, which meets the current intensity standard of bioelectric therapy. The introduction of this parameter realizes linear compensation of skin resistance, avoids deviation of actual current intensity caused by resistance fluctuations, and ensures that patients with different skin conditions obtain consistent current action effects. L2 refers to the correction reference coefficient. In this embodiment, L2 is preset to 2V. The base voltage increment corresponding to the tolerance correction is used to match the changes in current demand caused by the difference in tolerance. It can be determined based on clinical tolerance test. For every 0.1 increase in tolerance, the 2V base increment can correspond to an increase of 0.1mA in actual current, which has the highest matching degree with the subjective tolerance of the patient. The introduction of this parameter ensures that the current change is smooth when the tolerance is adjusted, and there will be no stinging sensation caused by sudden current changes, thus improving the comfort of treatment. In this embodiment: This dynamic management unit realizes full-dimensional personalized matching of current output, taking into account not only the severity of the lesion itself, but also the individual resistance, tolerance and location differences of the patient, and also compensates for the current attenuation and resistance fluctuation in the double closed circuit. It solves the problem of poor individual adaptability caused by the use of fixed current parameters in traditional electrotherapy, and is the core link to ensure the safety and effectiveness of treatment. The personalized adaptive voltage reference value IB is the core reference for current output during physiotherapy. It directly limits the upper and lower limits of the current adjustment by foot control, ensuring that the current intensity is sufficient to act on the lesion site while always limiting the output within a safe voltage range. The practitioner does not need to manually set the current parameters. The current can be dynamically adjusted within a reasonable range by stepping on the foot, realizing the precision and intelligence of current adjustment. When the personalized adaptive voltage reference value IB is smaller, it means that the patient has low tolerance, the lesion site is sensitive, or the adhesion is mild. The overall range of the foot-controlled current will be limited to a lower level to avoid discomfort caused by current stimulation. When the personalized adaptive voltage reference value IB is larger, it means that the patient has high tolerance, the lesion site is deep, or the adhesion is severe. The overall range of the foot-controlled current will be increased to a higher level to ensure sufficient energy to penetrate deep tissues and achieve the release of adhesions.

[0023] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 2 , Figure 3 and Figure 4 The processing flow of the foot control adjustment unit is as follows: The processing flow of the foot control adjustment unit is as follows: Step S531: By introducing a personalized adaptive voltage reference value, the overall range of the foot control pressure adjustment range is determined to ensure that the pressure change corresponds to a reasonable current change range when the practitioner steps on the pedal. Step S532: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the influence of adhesion status on the adjustment range is considered; Step S533: By analyzing the movement rate of the practitioner's hand movements, obtain the dynamic rate compensation coefficient of the manipulation operation, which is used to match the current requirements of different operation stages. Step S534: By analyzing the foot pressure habits of different practitioners, an adaptive coefficient for technician pressure adjustment habits is obtained to adapt to the operating preferences of different technicians. Combined with the current conversion coefficient, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure is finally output. Step S535: Based on the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure, the foot control device 1 writes the threshold range into the pressure control module, and at this time the circuit enters the pressure follow-up controllable state; The calculation formula for the foot control adjustment unit is as follows: ; ; in: [P] min P max [This refers to the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot-controlled pressure;] P min Lower limit 10N and upper limit 30N: In this embodiment, 10N is the minimum pressure of an adult's foot naturally placed on the pedal. Below this value, it is considered a false trigger (such as lifting the foot to adjust the standing posture) and no current output is triggered. In this embodiment, 30N is the upper limit of pressure that can be reached with a light step, avoiding excessive pressure that would require the practitioner to exert force to activate the current, thus improving the comfort of operation.

[0024] P max Lower limit 50N and upper limit 100N: In this embodiment, 50N is the moderate force required for a normal adult to pedal, ensuring that the minimum adjustment limit is sufficient to cover the normal current requirements. In this embodiment, 100N is the maximum force that an adult can withstand when stepping for a long time. Exceeding this value will cause foot fatigue. Setting an upper limit avoids the need for excessive stepping to reach the maximum current. The introduction of the personalized adaptive voltage reference value IB determines the overall range of the foot control pressure adjustment range. The higher the reference current, the higher the overall pressure value of the adjustment range, ensuring that the pressure change when the practitioner steps corresponds to a reasonable current change range, and avoiding insufficient matching between the stepping force and the current output. The introduction of the quantification score SC for the severity of fascial adhesions is beneficial because the more severe the adhesions, the narrower the range of foot control adjustment, which avoids the practitioner accidentally stepping on the wrong foot and causing excessive current, thus reducing operational risks. The lighter the adhesions, the wider the adjustment range, which improves operational flexibility and adapts to the current requirements of different techniques. The coefficient 1.7 is the benchmark value for matching the upper limit of the fascial adhesion unit score of 1.5. When SC = 1.5 (most severe), this item is 0.2, and the adjustment range is narrowed to the normal 13%; when SC = 0.2 (mildest), this item is 1.5, and the adjustment range is the full range. This realizes the control logic that the more severe the adhesion, the narrower the adjustment range, and avoids damage caused by excessive current adjustment in severe adhesion. Coefficient 0.6 (lower limit reference coefficient): The minimum current of foot control adjustment is 60% of the reference current, ensuring that the operator can obtain a basic effective current even with light foot step, without having to adjust from zero, thus improving operational efficiency; Coefficient 1.4 (Upper Limit Baseline Coefficient): The maximum current adjusted by foot is 140% of the baseline current, leaving 40% room for upward adjustment, which can meet the temporary strengthening and loosening needs of practitioners for key local adhesions, while avoiding the current from exceeding the safe range. PS refers to the pressure-to-current conversion coefficient. In this embodiment, PS is preset to 0.2V / N. It represents the increase in output voltage for every 1N increase in pedaling pressure. This is used to achieve a linear conversion between pedaling force and current intensity. It can be determined based on the user's pedaling habits. With a conversion coefficient of 0.2V / N, the normal pedaling force variation of an adult (10-100N) can cover the effective current adjustment range of 0-20V, resulting in optimal operation accuracy and smoothness. The introduction of this parameter ensures that the change in pedaling force corresponds to a reasonable change in current, and there will be no problem of sudden current increase when lightly pedaling or no change in current when heavily pedaling, thus reducing the user's learning cost. PV refers to the dynamic rate compensation coefficient of the manipulation technique, which represents the movement rate of the practitioner's hand and matches the current requirements of different operation stages. It can collect the hand movement rate v (in cm / s) in real time through the inertial sensor on the back of the practitioner's glove. The device automatically assigns a value according to the rate range: 1.2 when v < 2 cm / s, 1 when 2 ≤ v ≤ 5 cm / s, and 0.8 when v > 5 cm / s. When the practitioner performs deep static relaxation (slow rate), it automatically adjusts to the upper range, so that a higher current can be obtained without deliberately increasing the pressure of the foot, matching the high energy requirements of deep relaxation. When performing surface relaxation or finishing operations (fast rate), it automatically adjusts to the lower range, so as to avoid the stinging sensation caused by excessive current, and realize the automatic coordination of manipulation and current. When the practitioner performs myofascial release, the movement rate of the technique is directly related to the current operation objective: slow pressing (rate <2cm / s) is usually for static release of deep adhesions. At this time, the patient's pain threshold is higher and can withstand stronger current. Rapid pushing (rate >5cm / s) is usually for relaxing superficial fascia or finishing the operation. The current intensity should be appropriately reduced to avoid stimulation. Existing technology has never coordinated the movement rate of the technique with the foot-controlled current adjustment. This parameter can be directly obtained by measuring the hand movement rate through the existing inertial sensor on the back of the glove. There is no need to install an additional contact sensor. This is an innovative reuse of existing sensor data. PN refers to the technician's pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient, which represents the foot pressure habits of different practitioners and adapts to the operating preferences of different technicians. It is calculated by recording the average foot pressure of the technician's first 3 treatments through the pressure sensor built into the foot control device and comparing it with the standard reference pressure (50N). PN = Technician's historical average operating pressure ÷ Standard reference pressure, with a value range of 0.7-1.5. The default value is 1 when used for the first time. After three operations, it will be automatically calibrated. For technicians who are used to pressing lightly, the overall pressure of the adjustment range will be appropriately reduced, and for technicians who are used to pressing heavily, the overall pressure of the adjustment range will be appropriately increased. It can adapt to the operating habits of different technicians without manual adjustment of parameters, reducing the learning cost and improving the smoothness of operation. There are significant differences in foot strength and pedaling habits among different technicians. Some technicians are used to adjusting with light pressure, while others are used to adjusting with heavy pressure. A fixed pressure-current mapping can cause some technicians to have difficulty operating smoothly. This parameter is automatically calibrated by recording the technician's pressure adjustment habits in the first three operations through a device. Existing technologies usually use a fixed conversion coefficient and have not achieved personalized adaptation. In this embodiment: This foot control adjustment unit realizes personalized adaptation and manual technique coordination of foot control operation. It not only matches the lesion characteristics and current requirements of the patient, but also adapts to the operating habits and manual technique stage of the practitioner. It solves the problems of unsmooth operation and high risk of accidental touch caused by the traditional fixed pressure-current mapping relationship. It is the core support for ensuring the smoothness of foot control operation and realizing the focus of both hands on diagnosis and treatment. Foot pressure dynamic adjustment threshold range [P] min P max The effective operating range for the practitioner's footwork is defined, below P. min The current output is zero, avoiding accidental activation when the practitioner adjusts their posture; higher than P max The current no longer increases, avoiding current overload caused by excessive stepping force; the pressure and current have a linear relationship within the range, and the practitioner can precisely control the current intensity by stepping force. No hand operation equipment is required throughout the process, ensuring the continuity of the technique. When the interval is narrower (P) min With P maxThe smaller the difference (P), the greater the adhesion, and the higher the precision required for current adjustment. The practitioner only needs to slightly adjust the stepping force to achieve precise current control and avoid excessive current fluctuations; when the overall range is wider (P... min With P max The larger the difference (P), the lighter the adhesion, and the higher the operational flexibility required. The practitioner can adjust the stepping force significantly to suit the relaxation needs of different parts of the body. The lower the overall position of the area (P... min With P max When the value is smaller, it is more suitable for practitioners who are used to light stomping, allowing them to adjust the current without having to stomp hard; when the overall position of the interval is higher (P... min With P max When the value is larger, it is more suitable for practitioners who are used to stepping heavily, so as to avoid large fluctuations in current caused by slight movements.

[0025] Please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 2 , Figure 3 , Figure 4 and Figure 5 It should also be noted that this embodiment provides a structural description of the foot control device 1: The foot control device 1 is equipped with two pressure-sensitive conductive patches 2, which are used for the practitioner to stand barefoot. The side of the foot control device 1 is equipped with function buttons 3, adjustment knobs 4, bioelectric interface 5 and power interface 6.

[0026] Although embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A method of repairing fascia using hand therapy with foot-controlled electrical current, characterized by, include: Step S1, Preoperative circuit setup: The practitioner stands barefoot on the two pressure-sensitive conductive patches (2) on the left and right sides of the foot control device (1), and the circuit electrode is attached to the back of the patient. After the device is turned on, the practitioner, the patient and the foot control device (1) automatically form a closed bionic conductive circuit, and the device enters the standby state. Step S2, Full-area fascial palpation: The practitioner uses both hands to touch the affected area of ​​the patient to locate the extent of adhesions; Step S3: Multi-source data acquisition: Based on the practitioner's full-area fascial palpation and the closed biomimetic conductive circuit formed in step S1, the data acquisition module acquires data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive electricity, and foot control pressure, and inputs the acquired data into the database. Step S4, Transfer Processing: The data transfer module retrieves data related to fascial adhesion, electrical adaptation, and foot pressure from the database and preprocesses the retrieved data. Step S5: Comprehensive Data Calculation and Analysis The integrated calculation module receives pre-processed data related to fascial adhesion, adaptive voltage, and foot pressure. After calculation and analysis, it outputs a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion, a personalized adaptive voltage baseline value, and a dynamic adjustment threshold range for foot pressure. Step S6: Foot-controlled dynamic current coordinated manual repair: The practitioner can steplessly adjust the current penetration intensity in real time by stepping on the ground with both feet. The current is conducted directionally along the connective fascia through the skin of the hand to soften fibrotic hardened tissue and improve myofascial disorders. The foot control device (1) automatically coordinates the current based on the calculation results output by the comprehensive calculation module.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed by a practitioner of hand therapy. The specific operation process of the data comprehensive calculation and analysis in step S5 is as follows: Step S51: Based on the lesion extent coefficient, pain sensitivity coefficient, lesion depth coefficient, fascial dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, and adhesion tissue resonance offset rate in the fascial adhesion related data, and after weighting, a quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity is output. Step S52: Based on the patient's skin contact resistance, patient tolerance correction coefficient, site correction coefficient, biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient, technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient, conversion coefficient and correction benchmark coefficient in the data related to the adaptive voltage, and combined with the quantitative score of fascial adhesion severity, a personalized adaptive voltage benchmark value is output. Step S53: Based on the pressure-current conversion coefficient, manual operation dynamic rate compensation coefficient, and technician pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient in the foot control pressure related data, and combined with the quantified score of fascial adhesion severity and personalized adaptation voltage benchmark value, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure is output. The comprehensive calculation module used for data comprehensive calculation and analysis in step S5 includes a fascia adhesion unit, a dynamic management unit, and a foot control adjustment unit.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the method is performed by a practitioner of hand therapy. The processing flow of the fascial adhesion unit is as follows: Step S511: Quantify the degree of adhesion spread by analyzing the extent of involvement of myofascial lesions, and output the lesion extent coefficient based on the operator's palpation assessment. Step S512: By analyzing the patient's pain tolerance to pressing the lesion site, the degree of stimulation of the surrounding nerves by the adhesion is reflected, and a pain sensitivity coefficient is output. Step S513: By analyzing the depth of the fascial layer where the adhesion lesion is located, the tissue thickness that the current needs to penetrate is quantified, and the lesion depth coefficient is output based on the operator's palpation and pressure assessment. Step S514: By analyzing the relative sliding ability of adjacent fascia layers during passive movement, data is acquired and calculated using an inertial sensor to obtain the fascia dynamic sliding coupling coefficient, thereby quantifying the degree of adhesion mechanical restraint. Step S515: Weight the output values ​​from the above steps and apply upper and lower thresholds to finally output a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesion.

4. The method for repairing myofascia by manually treating with foot-controlled current according to claim 3, characterized in that: The processing flow of the dynamic management unit is as follows: Step S521: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the extent, depth, pain, sliding ability, and degree of hardening of the adhesions can be reflected. Step S522: By analyzing the resistance value at the contact point between the patient's skin and the practitioner's hand, the degree of obstruction to the entry of current into the patient's body is reflected, so as to calculate the contact resistance of the patient's skin. Step S523: By analyzing the overall tolerance of the patient to the pulsed current, a patient tolerance correction coefficient is obtained to adapt to the differences in current sensitivity among different individuals. Step S524: By analyzing the effects of differences in fascia thickness and nerve distribution density in different body parts on current tolerance, a site correction coefficient is obtained; Step S525: By analyzing the conduction efficiency of biocurrent in the fascial tissue at the lesion site, the biocurrent fascial conduction gain coefficient is obtained to reflect the attenuation effect of fascial water content and fibrosis degree on the current. Step S526: By analyzing the difference between the practitioner's own body resistance and the reference resistance, the technician-patient resistance difference compensation coefficient is obtained, which is used to compensate for the influence of the practitioner's resistance fluctuation on the output current in the two-person closed circuit. Step S527: Convert the resistance value into the corresponding voltage compensation amount through the conversion coefficient, and then combine it with the correction reference coefficient to match the changes in current demand caused by the difference in tolerance, so as to finally output a personalized adaptive voltage reference value.

5. The method for repairing myofascia by manually treating with foot-controlled current according to claim 4, characterized in that: The processing flow of the foot control adjustment unit is as follows: Step S531: By introducing a personalized adaptive voltage reference value, the overall range of the foot control pressure adjustment range is determined to ensure that the pressure change corresponds to a reasonable current change range when the practitioner steps on the pedal. Step S532: By introducing a quantitative score for the severity of fascial adhesions, the influence of adhesion status on the adjustment range is considered; Step S533: By analyzing the movement rate of the practitioner's hand movements, obtain the dynamic rate compensation coefficient of the manipulation operation, which is used to match the current requirements of different operation stages. Step S534: By analyzing the foot pressure habits of different practitioners, an adaptive coefficient for technician pressure adjustment habits is obtained to adapt to the operating preferences of different technicians. Combined with the current conversion coefficient, the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure is finally output. Step S535: Based on the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot control pressure, the foot control device (1) writes the threshold range into the pressure control module, and at this time the circuit enters the pressure follow-up controllable state.

6. The method for repairing myofascia by manually treating with foot-controlled current according to claim 1, characterized in that: Step S6 specifically involves: Based on the management module, when the practitioner's stepping force is lower than the minimum value of the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current output is 0 to avoid accidental activation. When the stepping force is within the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current changes linearly with the pressure. The current penetration depth can be steplessly adjusted by stepping lightly or heavily. When the stepping force exceeds the maximum value of the dynamic adjustment threshold range of foot pressure, the current is maintained and no longer increases.

7. The method for repairing myofascia by manually treating with foot-controlled current according to claim 6, characterized in that: Step S6 further includes: Real-time resistance compensation: The foot control device (1) re-collects the resistance of the practitioner and the patient every 2 seconds, dynamically updates the resistance difference compensation coefficient between the technician and the patient, and fine-tunes the current reference value to avoid current fluctuations caused by foot sweating and poor contact.

8. The method for repairing myofascia by manually treating with foot-controlled current according to claim 7, characterized in that: It also includes step S7: consolidation of overall fascial chain mechanical balance, specifically: Consolidation operation: Maintain the personalized adaptive voltage reference value output for 3-5 minutes, and the bioelectric field penetrates the whole body fascia network to repair damaged fascia structures; Effect verification: After the operation is completed, the practitioner will perform the fascial sliding test again and recalculate the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue. If the dynamic sliding coupling coefficient of the fascia increases by ≥30% compared with the preoperative value and the resonance offset rate of the adhesion tissue decreases by ≥20% compared with the preoperative value, the release is deemed effective. If the standard is not met, the current reference value can be adjusted based on the current parameters for supplementary release. Data retention: The foot control device (1) automatically retains all parameters, calculation results and effect data of this treatment, and automatically updates the patient's tolerance correction coefficient and the technician's pressure adjustment habit adaptive coefficient, so as to provide accurate parameter adaptation for the next treatment.

Images