Brevibacillus fermentate extracts for cleaning and malodor control and use thereof

Abstract

The present disclosure is directed towards compositions and methods for cleaning and / or malodor control. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to compositions comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or fraction thereof, for cleaning and / or malodor control and methods of use thereof. Compositions containing the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract are suitable for use as detergents and for cleaning and malodor control of fabrics and hard surfaces, as well as in a variety of other applications.

Description

[0001] TITLE BREVIBACILLUS FERMENTATE EXTRACTS FOR CLEANING AND MALODOR CONTROL AND USE THEREOF CROSS REFERENCE OF RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63 / 490,564, filed March 16, 2023, the entire content which is hereby incorporated by reference. FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE The present disclosure is directed towards compositions and methods for cleaning and / or malodor control. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to compositions comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or fraction thereof, for cleaning and / or malodor control and methods of use thereof. Compositions containing the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract are suitable for use as detergents and for cleaning and malodor control of fabrics and hard surfaces, as well as in a variety of other applications. REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY The content of the sequence listing electronically submitted with the application as an XML file (20240213_NB42156PCT_Sequence Listing; Size: 36,980 bytes; Created: February 13, 2024) forms part of the application and is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. BACKGROUND Trends toward cold water washing and synthetic athletic wear are driving a need for detergents that eliminate malodor, while at the same time the industry is moving away from laundry powders where traditional oxygen bleach was feasible. Human sebum organic soil build-up on textiles and fabrics over multiple wearing, storing, washing, and drying cycles is a substrate for malodor development and can be difficult to remove in low-temperature laundering. Cleaning compositions developed for fabrics, laundry and dishwashing applications typically comprise one or more enzymes to provide soil removal or fabric care benefits. Although enzymes are produced by fermentation using renewable feedstocks, their cleaning action generally requires the presence of a surfactant and a dispersing polymer to solubilize the breakdown products of a soil. Thus, a need exists for new approaches to remove malodor associated with fabrics, laundry and laundry machines. Cleaning compositions for dishwashing applications typically comprise perfume technology that provides a pleasant scent and masks malodors associated with soiled dishware. However, not all odors are effectively controlled by products on the market as amine-based malodors such as fish malodors, and sulfur-based malodors such as garlic and onion are difficult to combat. The difficulty in overcoming a broad range of malodors has spawned a diverse assortment of products to neutralize, mask, or contain the malodors. There remains a need for a dishwashing detergent composition that cleans dishware and is effective on a broad range of malodors, including amine-based and sulfur-based malodors, while not overpowering malodors with an overwhelming perfume. Furthermore, formulators are constantly looking to facilitate the cleaning of soiled surfaces. The removal of certain stains, particularly enzymatic stains from fabrics can be challenging, in particular with current trends to use less aggressive formulations and more environmentally friendly washing cycles, involving lower temperatures, shorter cycles and lower amounts of water. Despite exposure to surfactants, proteases, and amylases from typical laundry detergents, malodor compounds persist in washing machines, hard surfaces, fabrics and textiles and contribute to hygiene and odor problems. Many people spend a considerable amount of time and effort on cleaning of hard surfaces in or around the home or office on a regular basis. To clean hard surfaces cleaning compositions are typically used to improve cleaning efficiency (e.g. reduce the time and / or effort required). Hard surface cleaning compositions typically comprise surfactants which may aid in stain and / or soil removal, such as fatty stains / soils. Surfactants typically lower the surface tension of a liquid, the interfacial tension between two liquids and / or that between a liquid and a solid. Surfactants may act as detergents, wetting agents, emulsifiers, foaming agents, and dispersants. Surfactants may end up in large amounts in land and / or water ecosystems. This can be problematic as surfactants may increase the diffusion of other environmental contaminants and increase the exposure of animal and plant life with the latter. Malodor control in animal litter and animal waste is a problem that hasn’t been fully solved to consumer’ satisfaction. A variety of solutions have been previously employed including the use of clumping litters. These clumping litters concentrate the animal waste and absorb water to limit microbial growth and degradation of animal waste products into odiferous compounds. However, clumping litters offer several disadvantages for consumers including a hefty weight and potential for dusting. More effective solutions for mitigating malodor and improving freshness in cleaning applications, such as laundry, are thus needed. Also, there is still the need to provide a process that makes easier for the removal of soils from surfaces such as, but not limiting to, hard surfaces. Furthermore, there is still the need to provide more effective solution for mitigating malodor in animal litter and animal waste. SUMMARY The present disclosure is directed towards compositions comprising Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts for cleaning and malodor control and methods of use thereof. More specifically, the present disclosure is directed towards compositions comprising at least one Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or fraction thereof, and methods for providing soil or sebum cleaning and / or for providing malodor control to prevent, reduce and / or remove malodor on a fabric or surface. The disclosure also relates to compositions containing the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract that are suitable for use as detergents and for cleaning fabrics and hard surfaces, as well as in a variety of other applications. The present invention is based on the discovery that fermentate extracts from Brevibacillus laterosporus function as a malodor control component as well as a cleaning agent. In one aspect, the inventors have unexpectedly observed that an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a malodor control agent to prevent, reduce and / or remove fabric malodor. In another aspect, the inventors have unexpectedly observed that an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a cleaning agent. In one embodiment, the composition is a malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract that prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface can be selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the composition is a malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition. In one embodiment, the composition is a cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract that prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface can be selected from the group consisting of a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition. In one embodiment, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract or composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in at least one form selected from the group consisting of a loose or compact powder, a granule, a liquid suspension or solution, a spray solution, and any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the method is a method for cleaning a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying a cleaning comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract on said fabric or surface, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or surface. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract on said fabric or surface, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or dishware. In one embodiment, the method is a method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: (a) applying a hard surface cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract onto said hard-surface or said object; (b) leaving said composition on said hard-surface or said object to act; optionally, wiping said hard-surface or object; and (c), rinsing said hard-surface or said object. DETAILED DESCRIPTION The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be more readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art from reading the following detailed description. It is to be appreciated that certain features of the disclosure, which are, for clarity, described above and below in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single element. Conversely, various features of the disclosure that are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any sub-combination. It will be understood that in the following, embodiments referred to in relation to one broad aspect of the invention are equally applicable to each of the other broad aspects of the present invention described above. It will be further understood that, unless the context dictates otherwise, the embodiments described below may be combined. Microorganisms, Fermentates, and Fermentate Extracts As used herein, "microorganism" or “microbe” refers to a bacterium, a fungus, a virus, a protozoan, archaea, and other microbes or microscopic organisms. In some embodiments, the microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention can be subjected to treatments that render them non- replicating, for example, exposure to heat, desiccation, γ-irradiation, or UV- irradiation. A non-replicating microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention can be a dead cell or a living cell that has been rendered incapable of cell division. A non-replicating microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention can be an intact cell or a cell that has undergone partial or complete lysis. In some embodiments, the non-replicating cells can include a mixture of intact and lysed cells. The microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention may be included in a composition according to the invention in live, semi-active or inactivated or dead form. For the purposes of the invention, an “inactivated” or “dead” microorganism is a microorganism that is no longer capable of forming colonies in cultures. The dead or inactivated microorganisms may have intact or broken cell membranes. The dead or inactivated microorganisms may be obtained via any method known to those skilled in the art. The microorganisms suitable for use in the present invention includes a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108. The phylogenetic identity of Brevibacillus laterosporus was determined by sequencing the 16S region with primer set A (5´- GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA -3, SEQ ID NO: 2) and primer set B (5′- CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT, SEQ ID NO: 3). The 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 (SEQ ID NO: 1) is as follows: UGCAGUCGAGCGAGGGUCUUCGGACCCUAGCGGCGGACGGGUGA GUAACACGUAGGCAACCUGCCUGUAAGACUGGGAUAACAUAGGGAAACU UAUGCUAAUACCGGAUAGGGUUUUGCUUCGCCUGAAGCGAAACGGAAAG AUGGCGCAAGCUAUCACUUACAGAUGGGCCUGCGGCGCAUUAGCUAGU UGGUGAGGUAAUGGCUCACCAAGGCAACGAUGCGUAGCCGACCUGAGA GGGUGACCGGCCACACUGGGACUGAGACACGGCCCAAACUCCUACGGG AGGCAGCAGUAGGGAAUUUUCCACAAUGGACGAAAGUCUGAUGGAGCAA CGCCGCGUGAACGAUGAAGGCUUUCGGGUCGUAAAGUUCUGUUGUUAG GGAAGAAACAGUGCUAUUUAAAUAAGGUAGCACCUUGACGGUACCUAAC GAGAAAGCCACGGCUAACUACGUGCCAGCAGCCGCGGUAAUACGUAGGU GGCAAGCGUUGUCCGGAAUUAUUGGGCGUAAAGCGCGCGCAGGUGGCU AUGUAAGUCUGAUGUUAAAGCCCGAGGCUCAACCUCGGUUCGCAUUGGA AACUGUGUAGCUUGAGUGCAGGAGAGGAAAGUGGUAUUCCACGUGUAG CGGUGAAAUGCGUAGAGAUGUGGAGGAACACCAGUGGCGAAGGCGACU UUCUGGCCUGUAACUGACACUGAGGCGCGAAAGCGUGGGGAGCAAACA GGAUUAGAUACCCUGGUAGUCCACGCCGUAAACGAUGAGUGCUAGGUG UUAGGGGUUUCAAUACCCUUAGUGCCGCAGCUAACGCAAUAAGCACUCC GCCUGGGGAGUACGCUCGCAAGAGUGAAACUCAAAGGAAUUGACGGGG GCCCGCACAAGCGGUGGAGCAUGUGGUUUAAUUCGAAGCAACGCGAAG AACCUUACCAGGUCUUGACAUCCCACUGACCGCUCUAGAGAUAGAGCUU CCCUUCGGGGCAGUGGUGACAGGUGGUGCAUGGUUGUCGUCAGCUCGU GUCGUGAGAUGUUGGGUUAAGUCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCUUAUCUU UAGUUGCCAGCAUUCAGUUGGGCACUCUAGAGAGACUGCCGUCGACAA GACGGAGGAAGGCGGGGAUGACGUCAAAUCAUCAUGCCCCUUAUGACC UGGGCUACACACGUGCUACAAUGGUUGGUACAACGGGAUGCUACUUCG CGAGAAGAUGCUAAUCUCUUAAAACCAAUCUCAGUUCGGAUUGUAGGCU GCAACUCGCCUACAUGAAGUCGGAAUCGCUAGUAAUCGCGGAUCAGCAU GCCGCGGUGAAUACGUUCCCGGGCCUUGUACACACCGCCCGUCACACC ACGGGAGUUUGCAACACCCGAAGUCGGUGAGGUAACCGCAAGGAGCCA GCCGCCGA The microorganisms suitable for use in the present invention includes, but are not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788; In one aspect of the invention, fermentates are provided. As used herein, the term "fermentate" is to be understood as a composition (complex mixture) produced by propagating living microorganisms (microbial strains) in a nutrient medium. The fermentate may include a cellular mass component from said microorganisms, unspent media components, and metabolites (i.e., unused substrates and / or fermentation end-products). As used herein, a “cellular mass component” refers to any mixture of proteins, lipids (i.e., membranes), carbohydrates, exopolysaccharides, metabolites, etc. from the propagated microorganism. For example, as a microorganism grows it produces new cells that generally include additional cellular mass such as, without limitation, cell membranes, nucleic acids (i.e., DNA and / or RNA) internal subcellular structures, polysaccharides, and proteins (i.e., membrane-bound, secreted, and / or intracellular). Fermentates for use in the present invention include fermentates from the microorganism Brevibacillus laterosporus. The growth medium used for preparing the fermentate is any medium comprising necessary nutrients suitable for propagating the microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention. Suitable nutrients include but are not limited to amino peptides, peptides, yeast extract, salts, sugars, carbohydrates and / or vitamins. The medium can be based on dairy products, such as milk, cereals, fruits and / or vegetables. In one aspect the fermentates for use in the present invention includes fermentates from the microorganism Brevibacillus laterosporus, wherein said Brevibacillus laterosporus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus suitable for use in the present invention includes, but is not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. Fermentates can be further concentrated prior to be included in a composition to obtain an effective amount of actives in said fermentate. Fermentate extracts can be produced from the fermentates as described herein, Fermentates can be spray-dried or lyophilized prior to be include in a composition. It will be apparent that the fermentate may be used directly in the compositions and methods of the present invention, or that one or more fractions or extracts from said fermentate comprising actives may be isolated form the fermentate by any suitable means prior to use. In one aspect of the invention, fermentate extracts are provided. Fermentate extracts for use in the present invention include fermentates from the microorganism Brevibacillus laterosporus. As used herein, the term "fermentate extract” refers to an extract or fraction from a fermentate, wherein the fermentate was produced by propagating living microorganisms (microbial strains) in a nutrient medium as described above. In one aspect the fermentate extract is an extract of a fermentate produced by propagating of a Brevibacillus laterosporus species. In one aspect, the fermentate extract is a cell free supernatant of a fermentate. As used herein, a “cell free supernatant” ,“fermentate supernatant”, “cell free fermentate” or “fermentate filtrate” are used interchangeably and refer to a fermentate extract that is substantially free of viable cells, such as a supernatant of a cell culture of at least one microorganism from which the cells have been removed. It is understood that cells can be removed from the cell culture by any method known in the art and that such removal of cells (such as through centrifugation, filtration) may still result in cell free supernatants that can comprise a trace amount of cells or cell debris. Methods for separating cells from growth media are well known in the art and can rely upon physical methods, for example, centrifugation to produce a cell pellet and a culture supernatant, filtration, ultrafiltration, tangential flow-filtration, normal flow filtration or reverse osmosis. Alternatively, or in addition, the separation method can be ligand-based and include, for example, an antibody that specifically binds to Brevibacillus laterosporus. The antibody can be coupled to a solid support such as a magnetic bead. In one embodiment the cell free supernatant is obtained by filtration or centrifugation of the culture medium in which Brevibacillus laterosporus cells were cultivated. In one aspect, the cell free supernatant is obtained by filtration or centrifugation of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate. In one aspect, cells were removed from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate by pelleting cells (centrifuge at 4,000 to 8,000 x g) and passing the supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter, to obtain an essentially cell free supernatant. In one aspect, the fermentate extract for use in the present invention is a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract consisting essentially of cell free fermentate. The term "consisting essentially of" in the context of the fermentate includes that at least 90% of the fermentate have the indicated property (e.g. being cell free fermentate). Suitably at least 95% have the indicated property. Suitably at least 97% have the indicated property. Suitably at least 99% have the indicated property. In some embodiments at least 100% have the indicated property. The fermentate extract for use in the compositions and methods and / or uses of the present invention may be substantially free of viable Brevibacillus laterosporus cells, typically containing zero (or substantially zero) viable cells / mL fermentate. In another aspect, the fermentate extract is an extract of a cell pellet obtained from a fermentate by pelleting the cells. Cells pellets can be obtained by centrifugation of the fermentate and removing the cell free supernatant. In one aspect, the cell pellet extract is obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate by pelleting the cells (centrifuge at 4,000 to 8,000 x g) and pouring off the supernatant, to leave behind the portion of cell pellet. The pellet is resuspended in acidic water (1 / 10 v / v) to a pH 2.0 – 4.0, vortexed, pelleted by centrifugation (4,000 to 8,000 x g) and the extract liquid is passed through a 0.2 µM filter. Optionally, the cell pellet can be resuspended in alkaline water (1 / 10 v / v) at a pH higher than 8.5. The cell pellet can be suspended in any solution or under any condition that produces an effective amount of the fermentate extract solution, Starting from a cell pellet has the advantage that the volume of the resuspension liquid (extract volume) can be determined to produce an effective amount of the active extract and / or further concentrated to produce an effective amount of the active extract. Furthermore, resuspending the pellet in water or non-fermentation broth liquids, results in reducing or eliminating the non-active ingredients of the fermentation broth which may interfere with the actives of the cell pellet extract. In another aspect, Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts are produced by combining the cell free supernatant fraction described above with the cell pellet extract described above. In yet another aspect, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate is a fermentate extract that was prepared by first adjusting the pH of the fermentate (total fermentation broth) to a pH 2.0 - 4.0 prior to pelleting out the insoluble cellular matter and optionally filtering supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter to yield a cell free supernatant (also referred to as “whole broth fermentate extract”). The acid to make the pH adjustment can be hydrochloric acid, although any acid capable of adjusting the fermentation broth pH to 2.0-4.0 can be used. In preparing the whole broth fermentate extract of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate in this way, it comprises the actives present in both the cell free supernatant and cell pellet extract described herein. Alternatively, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate is a fermentate extract that was prepared by first adjusting the pH of the fermentate (total fermentation broth) to an alkaline pH prior to pelleting out the insoluble cellular matter and optionally filtering supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter to yield a cell free supernatant (also referred to as “whole broth fermentate extract”). In one aspect the fermentate extract is obtained from a fermentate that was produced with a nutrient medium having a pH between 2-12. In one aspect the fermentate extract is obtained from a fermentate wherein the pH of the fermentate was adjusted to a pH between 2-12, prior to obtaining the fermentate extract. Fermentate extracts can be further concentrated or purified prior to be included in a composition to obtain an effective amount of the fermentate extract. Fermentate extracts can be spray-dried or lyophilized prior to be include in a composition. It is also understood that production of a fermentate and fermentate extract can vary from batch to batch (fermentation to fermentation), which can result in different efficacies of the fermentate extract. As such batch to batch variation of the production of an effective amount of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts can be observed. In one embodiment, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, fermentate extract, or composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in a dry formulation or a liquid formulation. In one embodiment, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, fermentate extract, or composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in at least one form selected from the group consisting of a loose or compact powder, a granule, a liquid suspension or solution, a spray solution, or any combination thereof. In one aspect the granule comprises the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein at about 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30%, 31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight relative to a total weight of said granule. Granules can be produced by any means known in the art, such as but not excluding, spray drying fermentate extract on a core or spray drying the fermentate to form a granule itself. In one aspect the granule is a readily dispersible layered granule. The layered granule can comprise a core surrounded by a coating layer that includes at least one effective amount of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract distributed within a protectant matrix, and wherein the core is water-soluble and fast dissolving. The protectant matrix can include at least one polyhydroxy compound and at least one phosphate compound. In one aspect the fermentate extracts, or fractions thereof for use in the present invention includes fermentate extracts, or fractions thereof from the microorganism Brevibacillus laterosporus, wherein said Brevibacillus laterosporus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. Malodor control and cleaning compositions comprising Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts The present disclosure includes Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts and compositions comprising an effective amount of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts for malodor control and / or cleaning. In one aspect, the inventors have unexpectedly observed that an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a malodor control agent to prevents, reduces and / or removes malodor on a fabric or surface. A “Brevibacillus malodor control agent” or “malodor control component” or “malodor mitigation component” is herein understood to be an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract that is designed to prevent, reduce and / or remove a malodor and not function merely by covering up or masking odors. A genuine malodor control component provides a sensory and analytically measurable malodor reduction. As used herein, the term “malodor” refers to any odor that is not desired or intended on an item, for example after cleaning, and compounds generally offensive or unpleasant to most people. Examples of malodor include volatile compounds with a perceived unpleasant smell, which may be produced by microorganisms. The microorganisms may be gram positive or gram-negative bacteria (aerobic or anaerobic); algae, protozoa, and / or yeast or filamentous fungi. In some embodiments the malodor may be associated with one or more microorganisms, including one or more bacterial genera of Acinetobacter sp., Aeromicrobium sp., Brevundimonas sp., Microbacterium sp., Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas sp. (e.g. Pseudomonas fluorescens), Staphylococcus sp. (e.g. Staphylococcus epidermidis), and Stenotrophomonas sp., Streptomyces sp., Listeria sp., Streptococcus sp., and Escherichia sp. Another example of malodor includes unpleasant smells which can be sweat, or body odor associated with an item that has been in contact with a human or animal. Another example includes odors from spices that adhere to items, such as curry or other spices with a smell. In one embodiment, the composition is a malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface. Such a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can be selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface, is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaning composition, a laundry machine malodor control composition, a textile cleaning composition, a textile malodor control composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, a hard surface malodor control composition, a dishwasher cleaning composition, a dishwasher malodor control composition, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaning composition, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, wherein the additive is a laundry additive or dishwasher additive. In one aspect the laundry additive products for cleaning clothes and the like in domestic and commercial washing machines, is an additive product containing a storage-sensitive detergency additive material comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. The laundry additive materials material comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can have improved storage-stability by dispersing agglomerated particles of the additive material in an organic matrix of defined thermal characteristics and which can be combined in water-releasable manner with a water-insoluble, unitary carrier, resulting in laundry additive products having improved storage-stability, convenience and reproducibility in use and reduced problems of dust formation.- In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a surface, is selected from the group consisting of an animal litter malodor control composition, an odor control animal litter, an animal waste malodor control composition, and any one combination thereof. The microorganisms suitable for producing fermentates, fermentate extracts, and fractions thereof, for providing malodor control as described in the present invention includes, but are not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fun. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) cyclodextrins. In one aspect, the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising from 90% to 99.5% by weight of the composition of water. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, optionally b) cyclodextrins, wherein the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising at least 0.001 %, preferably from 0.002% to 3% by weight of the composition of perfume, preferably wherein the perfume comprises at least 60% by weight of the perfume of perfume raw materials having ClogP greater than 1.0. In one aspect, the malodor composition described herein can further comprise a polysaccharide system comprising a first polysaccharide and a second polysaccharide, wherein the first polysaccharide is xanthan gum, and wherein the second polysaccharide is selected from the group consisting of tara gum, konjac gum, locust bean gum, and combinations thereof. The first polysaccharide can be present at a level of greater than 10% and less than 90%, preferably 20% to 80%, more preferably 40% to 60% by weight of the polysaccharide system. In one aspect, the total polysaccharide level of the composition is less than 0.5% by weight of the composition, preferably less than 0.2%, more preferably less than 0.1 %, more preferably less than 0.08%, and most preferably less than 0.06% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface, is used for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on wound dressings, child and adult incontinence products, feminine hygiene fabrics or trash materials. Wound dressings come in many forms, including dressings not meant to be changed for several days or more than a week. These dressings are most often, but not limited to, dressings from surgical procedures or diabetic foot ulcers. Malodor is a particularly well-known issue with diabetic foot ulcers (The Diabetic Foot, Vol.8 No 3, 2005) and is a cause for additional discomfort for patients and clinical practitioners. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor formation on a wound dressing. Malodor in incontinence products and feminine hygiene products can be embarrassing for the person wearing or using the products. While fragrance has sometimes been used as a masking agent to cover up any potential malodors, the fragrance itself can be associated with having to wear incontinence or feminine hygiene products. The association between the fragrance masking agent and the embarrassment of having to use incontinence or feminine hygiene products makes a fragrance-free alternative to malodor control attractive to many consumers. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor formation on incontinence products. In some aspects, the fermentate extracts, or fractions thereof for use in the present invention includes fermentate extracts, or fractions thereof for use in malodor control of animal litter and animal waste. Malodor control in animal litter is a problem that hasn’t been fully solved to consumer’ satisfaction. As used herein, the terms “animal litter” or “animal bedding” are used interchangeably herein and refer to a wide variety of substrates including materials such as hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. Animal litter is used in a variety of situations to absorb animal urine and feces(EP0076122 US4407231A). Animal litter includes, but is not limited to, cat litter, dog litter, poultry litter, horse litter, companion animal litter, livestock litter, laboratory animal litter, Guinea pig litter, hamster litter, rat litter, mice litter, gerbil litter and small cage animal litter. A variety of solutions have been previously employed including the use of clumping litters. These clumping litters concentrate the animal waste and absorb water to limit microbial growth and degradation of animal waste products into odiferous compounds. However, clumping litters offer several disadvantages for consumers including a hefty weight and potential for dusting. Other litter bases have been explored and a variety of malodor control agents have been used in both clumping and non-clumping litters including: halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (U.S. Pat. No.4,494,482, Arnold, issued Jan.22, 1985); soluble salts of transition metals of Group Ib or Group IIb of the periodic table of elements, especially zinc, which are taught as both bacteriostats and urease inhibitors (U.S. Pat. No.4,494,481, Rodriguez et al., issued Jan.22, 1985 and U.S. Pat. No.4,736,706, Lang, issued Apr.12, 1988); boron containing compounds which are claimed to be urease inhibitors (U.S. Pat. Nos.4,949,672 and 5,176,108, Ratcliff et al. and Jenkins et al., issued Aug. 21, 1990 and Jan.5, 1993 respectively); sodium bisulfite complexes (U.S. Pat. No.5,267,531, Appel et al., issued Dec.7, 1993); and sodium or potassium bicarbonate (U.S. Pat. Nos.5,303,676 and 5,421,291, Lawson and Lawson et al., issued Apr.19, 1994 and Jun.6, 1995 respectively). Other approaches to controlling odor include the use of absorbents for odor such as cyclodextrin and polycarboxylate polymers (U.S. Pat. Nos.4,727,824; 4,844,010; 4,881,490; and 4,883,021, Ducharme et al., issued Mar.1, 1988; Jul.4, 1989; Nov.21, 1989; and Nov.28, 1989, respectively). Another common approach is using a fragrance “masking” technology, often including encapsulation (WO98 / 27261). Still another approach of “covering up” the bad odor involves using encapsulated perfumes (U.S. Pat. No.4,407,231, Colbom et al. issued Oct.4, 1983). Thus, many commercial cat litter products contain a fragrance to mask the malodor and to provide a freshness impression. Many of these fragrances are developed with human aesthetic preference in mind, apparently without consideration of the effect to the animal Thus, many perfumes used in commercial cat litter compositions contain significant amounts of ingredients that are repulsive to cats. On the other hand, commercially available products which claim control of animal behavior, such as cat repellent and cat attractant products, contain only the purported active ingredients without consideration to human aesthetics. Described herein are animal litter malodor control compositions comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. The compositions described herein may be useful in providing options for lower dust or lighter weight animal litters as well as malodor control in more traditional litter formulations. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface, is used for malodor control in animal litter. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can be absorbed onto animal litter and allowed to dry. Next, the treated litter will be dosed with synthetic urine and allowed to incubate to produce the strong ammonia odor associated with malodor in cat and pet litters. At the end of the incubation time, the cat or pet litter can be analyzed for malodor production. Malodor control can be determined by evaluation of ammonia from treated and untreated litter samples, or by evaluation from a sensory panel. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition is selected from the group of a liquid composition, a dry composition, an aerosol composition, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition is an additive for litter. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition further comprises a compound selected from the group consisting of a non-aqueous volatile carrier, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the litter is an odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance said particles being contacted with a composition comprising the animal litter malodor control composition described herein, wherein said malodor composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. In one embodiment, the litter is an odor control animal litter comprising an animal litter malodor control composition, wherein said malodor composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the litter is composed of hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. In one embodiment, the litter is an odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance said particles being contacted with a composition comprising the animal litter malodor control composition described herein, wherein said malodor composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein said litter is selected from the group consisting of cat litter, dog litter, poultry litter, horse litter, companion animal litter, livestock litter, laboratory animal litter, rabbit litter, Guinea pig litter, hamster litter, rat litter, mice litter, gerbil litter and small cage animal litter. In one embodiment, the litter is an odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance said particles being contacted with a composition comprising the animal litter malodor control composition described herein, wherein said malodor composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, further comprising an adjunct selected from dyes, fragrances, pigments, dedusting compounds, acids, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a litter, the method comprising applying directly to said litter an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a litter, the method comprising applying directly to said litter an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the litter is composed of hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. In one embodiment, the method is a method for making a malodor control animal litter, the method comprising applying to a litter an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. In one embodiment, the method is a method for making a malodor control animal litter, the method comprising applying to a litter an animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the litter is composed of hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. The present invention also relates to the field of animal waste treatment, specifically the treatment of solid and liquid waste from animal production sites, wherein said treatment provides malodor control. Animals, such as but not limited to, companion animals, livestock, laboratory animals, working animals, and sport animals, generate odors that most people find offensive, especially when the odors are strong. Odors generated by outdoor animals can lead to problems with neighbors, staff that work with the animals, and owners of the animals. Odors generated by indoor animals can aggravate the animal's owners, those living in the same household of the indoor animal, and visitors to the household where the animal is kept. The ability to effectively control and alleviate waste odors provides a healthier living environment for both the animal and people that work with or own the animals. Raising animals on an agricultural scale such as poultry, swine and dairy often use a system utilizing an anaerobic lagoon (EP1008559). While these systems do act to contain much of the waste, they leave something to be desired, especially related to malodor production. Odor issues often create tension between livestock producers and neighbors or entire communities. Because odors are produced during the anaerobic decomposition of manure, the surest way to decrease odors is to provide oxygen to the manure via aeration. However, aeration is not practical, is very expensive and necessitates high energy requirements. Lagoons release noxious odors into the air and have been associated with acid rain. The solids in a lagoon settle out and are anaerobically digested over time by benign bacteria. After a certain amount of time, the top layer of water is purified enough to allow it to be drawn off and reused, either as wash water, or as water for crops. In practice, the quality of the water drawn off is not good enough to make it useable for all crops, and when the water is sprinkled on a field, it releases noxious odors. Waste treatment processes which are primarily chemical have been explored. For Example, United States Patent No.4,049,545 "Chemical Waste Water Treatment Method" issued to Horvath Sept.20, 1977, describes a chemical method of treating domestic, commercial, or industrial waste water that relies on the successive addition of a coagulant aid such as portland cement and precipitation aids such as aluminum sulfate and copper sulfate followed by potassium permanganate and ozone as oxidizing and disinfecting agents. Another example is United States Patent No.5,614,102 "Method for Purifying Water" issued to Sakurada March 25, 1997, which relates to the use of at least two kinds of flocculants to treat sewage, followed by the use of at least three flocculants. Both processes are complicated enough to require continual monitoring of pH and other process parameters by a qualified operator. Ammonia and other odors coming from farms, such as horse farms, can aggravate neighbors, especially in residential areas. The ability to effectively control and alleviate waste odors associated with equine in urban areas provides a healthier living environment and helps horse enthusiasts to maintain good relationships with their neighbors. Wood shavings are commonly used as bedding material to help absorb urine and provide a surface for easy clean up. The condition or quality of bedding in equine stalls can be affected by a number of factors including frequency of clean-out, ventilation, moisture and temperature. Due to the health problems associated with high levels of ammonia, proper barn management is crucial. Daily cleaning, good ventilation and complete clean-out of stalls when bedding is too soiled are essential to control ammonia exposure. Due to the cost of bedding materials, most horse owners clean stalls daily but prefer not to strip stalls on a regular basis. There is great value in extending the bedding life and the amount of time that bedding remains in the stall. By reducing the ammonia and other odors in the bedding, bedding life can be extended, resulting in a great cost savings. Controlling the odor condition associated with litter in poultry houses is essential to ensure a better environment and thus better health and performance of the birds. The condition or quality of litter can be affected by a number of factors such as moisture, temperature, pH, ventilation, stocking density and frequency of cleanout. Of these factors, cleaning out the built-up litter more frequently is the most effective way to control and immediately improve litter quality. Unfortunately, this method of improving litter quality is becoming less of an option for producers since litter costs have dramatically increased in recent years. Therefore, many producers have adopted the practice of reusing litter as a strategy to reduce costs. In broiler houses, litter will routinely be reused for four or more sequential flocks of birds. In turkey grow or finish houses, litter will be reused for two or more sequential flocks of birds. While the reuse of litter has reduced the immediate litter costs, the use of built- up litter necessitates implementing better management practices to maintain litter quality. Poor litter conditions lead to an increase in the populations of microbial pathogens in the litter and excessive odor production such as ammonia production. Ammonia is a noxious gas that is produced by the microbial decomposition of nitrogenous waste in the litter. The deleterious effects of ammonia on broiler performance, health and carcass quality have been well documented. The presence of ammonia is a major physiological stress agent which is directly related to the health of the bird. This results in lower weight gain and generally unhealthy birds. Few treatments to improve litter quality have been reported. The prior art suggests utilizing acidifying compounds or absorbents to maintain proper litter pH, reduce ammonia and reduce the microbial load of the litter. However, due to the magnitude and diversity of microbial population in broiler litter and the continual introduction of new organisms in freshly excreted manure and from a variety of other sources, this approach is not always successful. Various chemical treatments have also been described in the prior art but are quite expensive and are only able to reduce pH for very short periods of time. Provided herein are animal waste malodor control compositions comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said animal waste and methods thereof. In one embodiment, the animal waste malodor control compositions comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said animal waste and methods thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30%, 31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by volume relative to a total volume of said composition. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight relative to a total weight of said composition. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in a dry formulation or a liquid formulation. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in at least one form selected from the group consisting of a loose or compact powder, a granule, a liquid suspension or solution, a spray solution, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition described herein , further comprising an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a rheology modifier, a softener, a surfactant, an anti- redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the malodor composition is a wash liquor that provides malodor control on a fabric when the fabric is exposed to multiple washes in said wash liquor, wherein said wash liquor comprises a low dose of fermentate extracts as described herein. A low dose of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein refers to a concentration (dose - % volume or % weight of total composition) of a fermentate extract that when applied in a single treatment is not effective for cleaning or malodor control, but when applied in multiple treatments, such as multiple wash cycles, is effective in cleaning and malodor control of a fabric, textile or surface, In one aspect, the cleaning composition described herein can further comprise a polysaccharide system comprising a first polysaccharide and a second polysaccharide, wherein the first polysaccharide is xanthan gum, and wherein the second polysaccharide is selected from the group consisting of tara gum, konjac gum, locust bean gum, and combinations thereof. The first polysaccharide can be present at a level of greater than 10% and less than 90%, preferably 20% to 80%, more preferably 40% to 60% by weight of the polysaccharide system. In one aspect, the total polysaccharide level of the composition is less than 0.5% by weight of the composition, preferably less than 0.2%, more preferably less than 0.1 %, more preferably less than 0.08%, and most preferably less than 0.06% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the Brevibacillus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non- sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. In one aspect, the inventors have unexpectedly observed that an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a cleaning agent. Brevibacillus fermentate extracts and cleaning compositions comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract are provided that prevent, reduce and / or remove sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. A “Brevibacillus cleaning agent” or “cleaning agent” is herein understood to be an effective amount of Brevibacillus fermentate extract that is capable of preventing, reducing and / or removing substances associated with sebum (sweat), dirt, food residues, grease and other objectionable matter (known in cleaning terminology as 'soil') and / or preventing substances associated with sebum and soil to adhere to surfaces, such as but not limited to, fabric, laundry, dishware and hard surfaces. In one embodiment, the cleaning agent described herein is a sebum cleaning agent comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the sebum cleaning agent prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum on a fabric or surface. In one embodiment, the composition is a cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. Such a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the composition is cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition. In one aspect, the detergent composition is a laundry detergent composition or a dishware detergent composition. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaning composition, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, wherein the additive is a laundry or dishwasher additive. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by volume relative to a total volume of said composition. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight relative to a total weight of said composition. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in a dry formulation or a liquid formulation. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in at least one form selected from the group consisting of a loose or compact powder, a granule, a liquid suspension or solution, a spray solution, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition described herein, further comprising an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a rheology modifier, a softener, a surfactant, an anti-redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition is a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the Brevibacillus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non- sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. The cleaning compositions of the present invention are advantageously employed for example, in laundry applications, hard surface cleaning, and dishwashing applications. The terms “cleaning compositions” and “cleaning formulations” refer to admixtures of ingredients that find use in the prevention, reduction and / or removal of undesired compounds (e.g., soil or stains) from items or surfaces to be cleaned, such as, for example, fabric, dishes, contact lenses, solid surfaces, hair, skin, and teeth. The compositions or formulations may be in the form of a liquid, gel, granule, powder, bar, solid, semi-solid, paste, emulsion, spray tablet, gel, capsule, unit dose, sheet, or foam, depending on the surface or item to be cleaned and the desired form of the composition or formulation. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition disclosed herein is a detergent composition or detergent formulation. As used herein, the term “detergent composition” or “detergent formulation” refer to mixtures of chemical and / or biological ingredients intended for use in a wash medium (e.g. a wash liquor) for the cleaning of soiled or dirty objects, including particular textile or non-textile objects or items. Such compositions of the present invention are not limited to any particular detergent composition or formulation. Detergent compositions / formulations generally include at least one surfactant, and may optionally include hydrolytic or cleaning enzymes, oxido-reductases, builders, bleaching agents, bleach activators, bluing agents, fluorescent dyes, caking inhibitors, masking agents, enzyme activators, antioxidants, solubilizers, and one or more microorganisms or microbes or microbial extracts, fermentates or fermentate extracts. In some embodiments, the compositions of the invention comprise an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, a derivative of a mono- and di-glyceride, and at least one protease, at least one alpha- amylase and, in addition, one or more additional components, such as, one or more additional surfactants, transferase(s), hydrolytic enzymes, oxido reductases, builders (e.g., a builder salt), bleaching agents, bleach activators, bluing agents, fluorescent dyes, caking inhibitors, masking agents, enzyme activators, antioxidants, and / or solubilizers. In some instances, a builder salt is a mixture of a silicate salt and a phosphate salt, preferably with more silicate (e.g., sodium metasilicate) than phosphate (e.g., sodium tripolyphosphate). Some compositions of the invention, such as, but not limited to, cleaning compositions or detergent compositions, do not contain any phosphate (e.g., phosphate salt or phosphate builder). In one embodiment, the composition is a laundry detergent composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on laundry. In one aspect the laundry detergent composition is a liquid laundry detergent composition. In one aspect, the laundry detergent composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one aspect, the laundry detergent composition further comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a surfactant, an anti-redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, and any one combination thereof. In one aspect the laundry detergent composition is a dry laundry detergent composition, such as but limiting to a loose powder, a compact powder or a granule. In one aspect, the dry laundry detergent composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition disclosed herein is a dishwashing composition. The term “dishwashing composition” refers to all forms of compositions including, for example, granular, unit-dose, and liquid forms for cleaning dishware and cutlery. In some embodiments, the dishwashing composition is an “automatic dishwashing” composition that finds use in automatic dishwashing machines. The term “dishware” refers to a surface such as dishes (e.g., plates, cups, glasses, bowls, containers, baking dishes and flatware made from ceramic, china, metal, glass, plastic (polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, etc.) and wood, and cutlery (e.g., utensils including, but not limited to spoons, knives, and forks) of any material, including but not limited to ceramics, plastics, metals, china, glass, and acrylics. In one aspect the dishwashing composition is a dry dishwashing composition such as but limiting to a loose powder, a compact powder or a granule; or a liquid dishwashing composition. In one aspect, the dry or liquid dishwashing composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. In one embodiment, the dishwashing composition is a dishwashing detergent composition comprising: (a) from about 0.1% to about 20% by weight of the total composition of a chelating agent; (b) from about 5% to about 80% by weight of the total composition of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic, semi-polar nonionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof; and (c) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on dishware. The cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of the Brevibacillus fermentate extract as described herein can further provide malodor control, such as but not limiting to laundry malodor control. In one aspect the Brevibacillus cleaning component can further provide malodor control during and after the washing process, in particular during and after the use (e.g. wearing) of the fabrics. In one embodiment, the cleaning composition disclosed herein is a hard surface cleaning composition. In one embodiment, the hard surface cleaning composition is a composition comprising: (a) an acidic component; (b) a surfactant selected from the group consisting of nonionic surfactants, anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants; amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof; (c) a surface modifying polymer; and, (d) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on said hard surface In one aspect, the hard surface cleaning composition is a liquid hard surface cleaning composition comprising from 10 to 95 wt. % of liquid solvent, and from 0.01 to 90 wt. % of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. In one aspect, the pH of the hard surface cleaning composition is between 2-9. In another aspect, the pH of the hard surface cleaning composition is at least 8. In one embodiment, the composition is a dryer sheet comprising a substrate, a fabric treatment composition and an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. In one aspect, the substrate of the dryer sheet can be a non-woven. In one aspect, the substrate of the dryer sheet comprises at least a first layer and a second layer and preferably a plurality of embossments in the first layer and the second layer through which the fermentate extract penetrates said first layer and said second layer. It will be apparent that the composition for use according to the present invention may comprise an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, for example, of at least about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by volume relative to a total volume of said composition. It will be further apparent that the composition for use according to the present invention may comprise an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, for example, of at least about 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight relative to a total weight of said composition In one aspect, the composition comprises an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9% or up to 10% by weight relative to a total weight of said composition. In some embodiments, the cleaning or malodor compositions of the present invention further comprise materials including, but not limited to, aqueous carriers, surfactants, builders, bleaches, bleach activators, bleach catalysts, enzymes, enzyme stabilizing systems, chelants (chelating agents), optical brighteners, anti-redeposition agents, soil release polymers, dyes, dye transfer agents, dispersants, suds suppressors, dyes, fragrances, perfumes, colorants, filler salts, hydrotropes, photoactivators, fluorescers, fabric conditioners, hydrolyzable surfactants, preservatives, anti-oxidants, anti- shrinkage agents, anti-wrinkle agents, germicides, fungicides, color speckles, silvercare, anti-tarnish and / or anti-corrosion agents, alkalinity sources, solubilizing agents, carriers, processing aids, pigments, and pH control agents (See e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos.6,610,642, 6,605,458, 5,705,464, 5,710,115, 5,698,504, 5,695,679, 5,686,014 and 5,646,101, all of which are incorporated herein by reference). In one aspect, the cleaning composition described herein contains from 30% to 95%, alternatively 40% to 80%, alternatively 50% to 75% of an aqueous liquid carrier, in which the other essential and optional compositions components are dissolved, dispersed or suspended. Cleaning compositions, as provided herein, include, unless otherwise indicated, granular, powder, liquid, gel, paste, unit dose, bar form and / or flake type washing agents and / or fabric treatment compositions, including but not limited to products for laundering fabrics, fabric softening compositions, fabric enhancing compositions, fabric freshening compositions, and other products for the care and maintenance of fabrics, and combinations thereof. Such compositions may be pre-treatment compositions for use prior to a washing step or may be rinse added compositions, as well as cleaning auxiliaries, such as bleach additives and / or “stain-stick” or pre-treat compositions or substrate- laden products such as dryer added sheets. The cleaning and / or malodor compositions herein can be formulated such that, during use in aqueous cleaning operations, the wash water will have a pH of from about 3.0 to about 11. Liquid product formulations are typically formulated to have a pH from about 5.0 to about 9.0. Granular laundry products are typically formulated to have a pH from about 8.0 to about 11.0. Techniques for controlling pH at recommended usage levels include the use of buffers, alkalis, acids, etc., and are well known to those skilled in the art. Suitable low pH cleaning compositions typically have a pH of from about 3.0 to about 5.0 or even from about 3.5 to about 4.5. Low pH cleaning compositions are typically free of surfactants that hydrolyze in such a pH environment. Such surfactants include sodium alkyl sulfate surfactants that comprise at least one ethylene oxide moiety or even from about 1 to about 16 moles of ethylene oxide. Such cleaning compositions typically comprise enough of a pH modifier, such as sodium hydroxide, monoethanolamine, or hydrochloric acid, to provide such cleaning composition with a neat pH of from about 3.0 to about 5.0. Such compositions typically comprise at least one acid stable enzyme. In some embodiments, the compositions are liquids, while in other embodiments, they are solids. The pH of such liquid compositions is typically measured as a neat pH. The pH of such solid compositions is measured as a 10% solids solution of the composition wherein the solvent is distilled water. In these embodiments, all pH measurements are taken at 20˚C, unless otherwise indicated. Suitable high pH cleaning compositions typically have a neat pH of from about 9.0 to about 11.0, or even a neat pH of from 9.5 to 10.5. Such cleaning compositions typically comprise a sufficient amount of a pH modifier, such as sodium hydroxide, monoethanolamine, or hydrochloric acid, to provide such cleaning composition with a neat pH of from about 9.0 to about 11.0. Such compositions typically comprise at least one base-stable enzyme. In some embodiments, the compositions are liquids, while in other embodiments, they are solids. The pH of such liquid compositions is typically measured as a neat pH. The pH of such solid compositions is measured as a 10% solids solution of said composition wherein the solvent is distilled water. In these embodiments, all pH measurements are taken at 20˚C, unless otherwise indicated. Concentrations of detergent compositions in typical wash solutions throughout the world vary from less than about 800 ppm of detergent composition (“low detergent concentration geographies”), for example about 667 ppm in Japan, to between about 800 ppm to about 2000 ppm (“medium detergent concentration geographies”), for example about 975 ppm in U.S. and about 1500 ppm in Brazil, to greater than about 2000 ppm (“high detergent concentration geographies”), for example about 4500 ppm to about 5000 ppm in Europe and about 6000 ppm in high suds phosphate builder geographies. In some embodiments, the detergent compositions described herein may be utilized at a temperature of from about 10ºC to about 60ºC, or from about 20ºC to about 60ºC, or from about 30ºC to about 60ºC, from about 40ºC to about 60ºC, from about 40ºC to about 55ºC, or all ranges within 10ºC to 60ºC. In some embodiments, the detergent compositions described herein are used in “cold water washing” at temperatures of from about 10ºC to about 40ºC, or from about 20ºC to about 30ºC, from about 15ºC to about 25ºC, from about 15ºC to about 35ºC, or all ranges within 10ºC to 40ºC. In some embodiments, the detergent composition described herein is a laundry detergent composition further comprising one or more additional surfactant. In some embodiments, the additional surfactant is selected from a non-ionic, ampholytic, semi-polar, anionic, cationic, zwitterionic, and combinations and mixtures thereof. In yet a further embodiment, the additional surfactant is selected from an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, a zwitterionic surfactant, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise from about 0.1% to about 60%, about 1% to about 50%, or about 5% to about 40% surfactant by weight of the composition. In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions comprise a surfactant system that comprises an organic acid derivative of mono- and di-glycerides in combination with one or more additional surfactants. The one or more additional surfactant may be either biobased or synthetic. In some embodiments, the one or more additional surfactants is selected from the group consisting of a non-ionic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, a zwitterionic surfactant, an ampholytic surfactant, a semi-polar non-ionic surfactant, and a combination thereof. Exemplary surfactants include, but are not limited to sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, C12-14 pareth-7, C12-15 pareth-7, sodium C12-15 pareth sulfate, C14-15 pareth-4, sodium laureth sulfate (e.g., Steol CS-370), sodium hydrogenated cocoate, C12 ethoxylates (Alfonic 1012-6, Hetoxol LA7, Hetoxol LA4), sodium alkyl benzene sulfonates (e.g., Nacconol 90G), and combinations and mixtures thereof. Anionic surfactants include but are not limited to linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS), alpha-olefinsulfonate (AOS), alkyl sulfate (fatty alcohol sulfate) (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS or AES), secondary alkanesulfonates (SAS), alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, or soap. Nonionic surfactants include but are not limited to alcohol ethoxylate (AEO or AE), carboxylated alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenol ethoxylate, alkylpolyglycoside, alkyldimethylamine oxide, ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide, fatty acid monoethanolamide, polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide (e.g., as described in WO92 / 06154), polyoxyethylene esters of fatty acids, polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters (e.g., TWEENs), polyoxyethylene alcohols, polyoxyethylene isoalcohols, polyoxyethylene ethers (e.g., TRITONs and BRIJ), polyoxyethylene esters, polyoxyethylene-p- tert-octylphenols or octylphenyl-ethylene oxide condensates (e.g., NONIDET P40), ethylene oxide condensates with fatty alcohols (e.g., LUBROL), polyoxyethylene nonylphenols, polyalkylene glycols (SYNPERONIC F108), sugar-based surfactants (e.g., glycopyranosides, thioglycopyranosides), and combinations and mixtures thereof. In a further embodiment, the laundry detergent compositions described herein further comprise a surfactant mixture that includes, but is not limited to 5- 15% anionic surfactants, < 5% nonionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, phosphonates, soap, enzymes, perfume, butylphenyl methylpropionate, geraniol, zeolite, polycarboxylates, hexyl cinnamal, limonene, cationic surfactants, citronellol, and benzisothiazolinone. The laundry detergent compositions described herein may additionally include one or more detergent builders or builder systems, a complexing agent, a polymer, a bleaching system, a stabilizer, a foam booster, a suds suppressor, an anti-corrosion agent, a soil-suspending agent, an anti-soil redeposition agent, a dye, a bactericide, a hydrotrope, an optical brightener, a fabric conditioner, and a perfume. In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions optionally comprise other anionic surfactants that are produced using renewable feedstocks, for example a rhamnolipid. Rhamnolipids are carboxylic acid containing anionic surfactants that consist of one or more alkyl chains connected via a beta hydroxy group to a rhamnose sugar. They may be produced from renewable raw materials as previously disclosed in, for example, WO2015180907. It is further optional to include nonionic, cationic or zwitterionic surfactants in the cleaning compositions. The cleaning or malodor compositions as provided herein may comprise one or more enzymes to provide soil removal or fabric care or hard surface cleaning benefits (also referred to as cleaning enzymes). The one or more enzyme can be selected from acyl transferases, alpha-amylases, beta- amylases, alpha-galactosidases, arabinosidases, aryl esterases, beta- galactosidases, carrageenases, catalases, cellobiohydrolases, cellulases, chondroitinases, cutinases, beta-glucanases, endo-beta-1, 4-glucanases, endo- beta-mannanases, esterases, exo-mannanases, feruloyl esterase, galactanases, glucoamylases, hemicellulases, hexosaminidases, hyaluronidases, keratinases, laccases, lactases, ligninases, lipases, lipoxygenases, mannanases, metalloproteases, nucleases (e.g. deoxyribonucleases and ribonucleases), oxidases, oxidoreductases, proteases, pectinases, pectate lyases, pectin acetyl esterases, pectinases, pentosanases, perhydrolases, peroxidases, phenoloxidases, phosphatases, phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, phytases, polygalacturonases, polyesterases, proteases, pullulanases, reductases, rhamnogalacturonases, , tannases, transglutaminases, xylanases, xylan acetyl-esterases, xylanases, xyloglucanases, xylosidases, and any combination or mixture thereof. In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions as provided herein further comprises at least one protease, at least one alpha-amylase, or a combination of at least one protease and at least one alpha-amylase. In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions comprise additional cleaning enzymes in addition to the at least one protease, at least one alpha-amylase, or a combination of at least one protease and at least one alpha-amylase, such as but not limited to a mannanase, cellulase, lipase, cutinase, perhydrolase, pectate lyase, a DNAse, a galactanase, glycosyl hydrolase, nuclease, and a phosphodiesterase. The protease for use in in the cleaning compositions of the instant disclosure include any polypeptide having protease activity. In one embodiment, the protease is a serine protease. In another embodiment, the protease is a metalloprotease, a fungal subtilisin, or an alkaline microbial protease or a trypsin-like protease. Suitable proteases include those of animal, vegetable or microbial origin. In some embodiments, the protease is a microbial protease. In other embodiments, the protease is a chemically or genetically modified mutant. In another embodiment, the protease is subtilisin like protease or a trypsin-like protease. In other embodiments, where two or more proteases are used in the cleaning compositions the protease do not contain cross- reactive epitopes with the variant as measured by antibody binding or other assays available in the art. Exemplary subtilisin proteases for use in the compositions provided herein include those variants derived from for example, Bacillus (e.g., BPN’, Carlsberg, subtilisin 309, subtilisin 147, and subtilisin 168), or fungal origin, such as, for example, those described in US Patent No. 8,362,222. Exemplary proteases include but are not limited to those described in WO92 / 21760, WO95 / 23221, WO2008 / 010925, WO09 / 149200, WO09 / 149144, WO09 / 149145, WO 10 / 056640, WO10 / 056653, WO2010 / 0566356, WO11 / 072099, WO2011 / 13022, WO11 / 140364, WO 12 / 151534, WO2015 / 038792, WO2015 / 089447, WO2015 / 089441, WO 2017 / 215925, US Publ. No.2008 / 0090747, US 5,801,039, US 5,340,735, US 5,500,364, US 5,855,625, RE 34,606, US 5,955,340, US 5,700,676 US 6,312,936, US 6,482,628, US 8,530,219, US Provisional Appl Nos.62 / 180673 and 62 / 161077, and PCT Appl Nos. PCT / US2015 / 021813, PCT / US2015 / 055900, PCT / US2015 / 057497, PCT / US2015 / 057492, PCT / US2015 / 057512, PCT / US2015 / 057526, PCT / US2015 / 057520, PCT / US2015 / 057502, PCT / US2016 / 022282, and PCT / US16 / 32514, as well as metalloproteases described in WO1999014341, WO1999033960, WO1999014342, WO1999034003, WO2007044993, WO2009058303, WO 2009058661, WO2014071410, WO2014194032, WO2014194034, WO 2014194054, and WO 2014 / 194117. Exemplary proteases include, but are not limited to trypsin (e.g., of porcine or bovine origin) and the Fusarium protease described in WO89 / 06270. Exemplary commercial proteases include, but are not limited to MAXATASE®, MAXACAL™, MAXAPEM™, OPTICLEAN®, OPTIMASE®, PROPERASE®, PURAFECT®, PURAFECT® OXP, PURAMAX™, EXCELLASE™, PREFERENZ™ proteases (e.g. P100, P110, P280), EFFECTENZ™ proteases (e.g. P1000, P1050, P2000), EXCELLENZ™ proteases (e.g. P1000), ULTIMASE®, and PURAFAST™ (DuPont); ALCALASE®, BLAZE®, BLAZE® variants, BLAZE® EVITY®, BLAZE® EVITY® 16L, CORONASE®, SAVINASE®, SAVINASE® ULTRA, SAVINASE® EVITY®, SAVINASE® EVERIS®, PRIMASE®, DURAZYM™, POLARZYME®, OVOZYME®, KANNASE®, LIQUANASE®, LIQUANASE EVERIS®, NEUTRASE®, PROGRESS UNO®, RELASE®, and ESPERASE® (Novozymes); BLAP™ and BLAP™ variants (Henkel); LAVERGY™ PRO 104 L (BASF), KAP (B. alkalophilus subtilisin (Kao)) and BIOTOUCH® (AB Enzymes). Any amylase (e.g., alpha and / or beta) suitable for use in alkaline solutions may be useful to include in such composition. An exemplary amylase can be a chemically or genetically modified mutant. Exemplary amylases include, but are not limited to those of bacterial or fungal origin, such as, for example, amylases described in GB 1,296,839, WO9100353, WO9402597, WO94183314, WO9510603, WO9526397, WO9535382, WO9605295, WO9623873, WO9623874, WO 9630481, WO9710342, WO9741213, WO9743424, WO9813481, WO 9826078, WO9902702, WO 9909183, WO9919467, WO9923211, WO9929876, WO9942567, WO 9943793, WO9943794, WO 9946399, WO0029560, WO0060058, WO0060059, WO0060060, WO 0114532, WO0134784, WO 0164852, WO0166712, WO0188107, WO0196537, WO02092797, WO 0210355, WO0231124, WO 2004055178, WO2004113551, WO2005001064, WO2005003311, WO 2005018336, WO2005019443, WO2005066338, WO2006002643, WO2006012899, WO2006012902, WO2006031554, WO 2006063594, WO2006066594, WO2006066596, WO2006136161, WO 2008000825, WO2008088493, WO2008092919, WO2008101894, WO2008 / 112459, WO2009061380, WO2009061381, WO 2009100102, WO2009140504, WO2009149419, WO 2010 / 059413, WO 2010088447, WO2010091221, WO2010104675, WO2010115021, WO10115028, WO2010117511, WO 2011076123, WO2011076897, WO2011080352, WO2011080353, WO 2011080354, WO2011082425, WO2011082429, WO 2011087836, WO2011098531, WO2013063460, WO2013184577, WO 2014099523, WO2014164777, and WO2015077126. Exemplary commercial amylases include, but are not limited to AMPLIFY®, DURAMYL®, TERMAMYL®, FUNGAMYL®, STAINZYME®, STAINZYME PLUS®, STAINZYME PLUS®, STAINZYME ULTRA® EVITY®, and BAN™ (Novozymes); EFFECTENZ™ S 1000, POWERASE™, PREFERENZ™ S 100, PREFERENZ™ S 110, EXCELLENZ™ S 2000, RAPIDASE® and MAXAMYL® P (DuPont). In some embodiments, the compositions provided herein comprise an effective amount of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract in combination with a nuclease, such as a DNase or RNase. Exemplary nucleases include, but are not limited to, those described in WO2015181287, WO2015155350, WO2016162556, WO2017162836, WO2017060475 (e.g. SEQ ID NO: 21), WO2018184816, WO2018177936, WO2018177938, WO2018 / 185269, WO2018185285, WO2018177203, WO2018184817, WO2019084349, WO2019084350, WO2019081721, WO2018076800, WO2018185267, WO2018185280, WO2018206553, WO2019 / 086530, and WO2020099490. Other nucleases which can be used in combination with the polypeptides having lysozyme activity in the compositions and methods provided herein include those described in Nijland R, Hall MJ, Burgess JG (2010) Dispersal of Biofilms by Secreted, Matrix Degrading, Bacterial DNase. PLoS ONE 5(12) and Whitchurch, C.B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Ragas, P.C., Mattick, J.S. (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295: 1487. In one aspect, the cleaning compositions as provided herein comprise from 0.001% to 10.0% enzyme protein by weight of the composition comprising at least one cleaning enzyme. In one embodiment, the composition comprises from about 0.00001% to about 10%, 0.0001% to about 10%, about 0.001% to about 5%, about 0.001% to about 2%, from about 0.005% to about 0.5%, or from 0.001% to 0.2% enzyme by weight of composition. In one embodiment, the cleaning compositions comprises from 0.001 to 0.5% enzyme protein by weight of the composition comprising at least one protease, at least one alpha- amylase or combination of at least one protease and at least one alpha- amylase. Enzyme component weights are based on total active protein. All percentages and ratios are calculated by weight unless otherwise indicated. All percentages and ratios are calculated based on the total composition unless otherwise indicated. In laundry detergent compositions, the enzyme levels are expressed in ppm, which equals mg active protein / kg detergent composition. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise one or more enzyme stabilizer. In some embodiments, the enzyme stabilizer is a water-soluble source of calcium and / or magnesium ions. In some embodiments, the enzyme stabilizers include oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and inorganic divalent metal salts, including alkaline earth metals, such as calcium salts. In some embodiments, the enzymes employed herein are stabilized by the presence of water-soluble sources of zinc (II), calcium (II) and / or magnesium (II) ions in the finished compositions that provide such ions to the enzymes, as well as other metal ions (e.g., barium (II), scandium (II), iron (II), manganese (II), aluminum (III), tin (II), cobalt (II), copper (II), nickel (II), and oxovanadium (IV)). Chlorides and sulfates also find use in some embodiments. Exemplary oligosaccharides and polysaccharides (e.g., dextrins) are described, for example, in WO07145964. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein contain reversible enzyme inhibitors such as, for example, glycoside or protein lysozyme inhibitors, boron- containing compounds (e.g., borate, 4-formyl phenyl boronic acid, and phenyl- boronic acid derivatives, such as, e.g., are described in WO9641859), a peptide aldehydes (such as, e.g., is described in WO2009118375 and WO2013004636), or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise at least one chelating agent (chelants). Suitable chelating agents may include, but are not limited to copper, iron, and / or manganese chelating agents, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprises from about 0.1% to about 15% or even from about 3.0% to about 10% chelating agent by weight of composition. In some still further embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise at least one deposition aid. Suitable deposition aids include, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polycarboxylate, soil release polymers such as polyterephthalic acid, clays such as kaolinite, montmorillonite, attapulgite, illite, bentonite, halloysite, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise at least one anti-redeposition agent. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise one or more dye transfer inhibiting agents. In some embodiments, the laundry detergent compositions described herein comprise one or more silicates. In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition containing alkyl ether carboxylic acids, betaines, anionic surfactant, non-ionic surfactant for providing softening benefits (WO2013 / 087286). In some embodiments, the cleaning compositions comprising an effective amount of one or more a Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition containing sulfite radical scavengers, protease stabilizers / inhibitors or combinations thereof (WO2022 / 157311) In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition as described in US20210317387A1, WO2021 / 219296, WO2021 / 127662, WO2021 / 041685, US11208619 and US20220186144. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition comprising dispersin variants, such as but limiting to a liquid laundry detergent composition described in US20210317387A1. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition is a highly alkaline textile washing agent, such as but limiting to a liquid laundry detergent composition described in WO2021 / 219296. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition containing polyethylene glycol and an organic acid, such as but limiting to, a detergent composition described in WO2021 / 041685. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a detergent composition containing polyethylene glycol and an organic acid, such as but limiting to, a detergent composition described in WO2021 / 041685. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a detergent composition with effect on protein stains, such as but limiting to, a detergent composition described in US11208619. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a detergent composition containing soil release polymers, such as but limiting to, a detergent composition described in US20220186144. In some embodiments, the cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of one or more Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein is a liquid laundry detergent composition is a low-density unit dose detergent with encapsulated fragrance, such as but limiting to a detergent composition described in WO2021 / 127662. In one aspect, the malodor control and cleaning compositions, as provided herein, include fragrances and / or perfumes. Fragrances, or perfumes, for use in the compositions and methods herein include any fragrance / perfume available. There are no limitations on the type of detergent composition in which perfumes may be incorporated. They may, for example, be included in malodor control or cleaning compositions that are in the form of liquids, gels, powders, granulates, tablets, pods, pouches and soap bars. Perfume components may be incorporated into detergent compositions in physical forms and using methods known in the art, e.g. adding the perfume components as liquids, solid particles and / or microcapsules. In one embodiment, the malodor control composition is a composition comprising: as a malodor control active ingredient an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and a fragrance. Cleaning methods and methods for providing malodor control The compositions described herein can be used in methods for cleaning and / or providing malodor control. Methods are provided for the prevention, reduction, or removal of odor from surfaces such as but not limiting to textiles, fabrics, soft surfaces and hard surfaces. In one aspect, methods for preventing, removing, or reducing malodor on a textile or fabric, a surface, or in a solution are provided, wherein the methods comprise contacting the textile or fabric, surface, or solution with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. Reduction in malodor may be measured by human sensory observations, such as by smelling the surface, textile, fabric or solution, or by analytical measurement of malodorous compounds, such as but not limited to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC / MS) or gas chromatography mass spectrometry with solid phase microextraction (GC / MS-SPME) or gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O). The textile, fabric or surface can be contacted with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract in a washing machine or in a manual wash tub (e.g. for handwashing). In one embodiment, the textile, fabric or surface is contacted with the effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract in a wash liquor. In another embodiment, a solution containing the effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is incubated with or flowed over a hard surface, such as by pumping the solution through tubing or pipes or by filling a reservoir with the solution. Another embodiment is directed to a method of laundering a textile or fabric, wherein the method comprises contacting a textile or fabric with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for an amount of time sufficient to prevent, reduce or remove malodor from the textile or fabric and optionally rinsing the textile or fabric. In some embodiments, the textiles or fabrics or surfaces are contacted with the effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract or compositions comprising the effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract under conditions for any amount of time desired or for any period of time sufficient to prevent, reduce or remove odor on the textile and / or clean the textile or surface. In one embodiment, the contacting step is between about 5 minutes and about 10 days. In some embodiments, the contacting takes place in a wash liquor for about 5 to about 400 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 300 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 250 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 200 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 150 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 100 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 50 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, the prevention, reduction, or removal of microbial growth or biofilm occurs in a single wash cycle. In some embodiments, the prevention, reduction, or removal of microbial growth or biofilm occurs over many wash cycles, such that the total contacting time over multiple wash cycles is about 5 to about 400 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 300 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 250 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 200 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 150 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 100 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 50 minutes, between about 5 minutes to about 30 minutes. In one aspect, the disclosure provides methods for preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an item, wherein the methods comprise contacting an item with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing said composition off of said item. In another aspect, the disclosure provides methods for preventing, reducing or removing a malodor associated with a textile or fabric or surface, wherein the method comprises contacting a textile or fabric or surface with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing the textile or fabric or surface. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein on said fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or dishware. In one embodiment, the method is a method of malodor removal from a fabric comprising: a) treating the fabric directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein; and, b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface in a wash liquor comprising: a) providing a first washing cycle by contacting the fabric or surface with a wash bath wherein the wash bath comprises a low dose of on effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing the fabric; and, b) repeat the washing cycle of (a) multiple times until a prevention, reduction or removal of the malodor on said fabric or surface is observed. In one aspect the wash cycle is repeated 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,89, up 10 times. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an animal waste or an animal litter comprising said animal waste, the method comprising applying to said animal waste or animal litter comprising said animal waste an animal waste malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said animal waste or said animal litter. In one embodiment, the method is a method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an animal waste, the method comprising applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising said extract, to a surface on which one or more animal is housed, wherein said extract or composition comprising said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor from said animal waste. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts, compositions, and methods provided herein have utility in a wide array of applications in which preventing, reducing, or removing soil is desired, such as household cleaning, including in washing machines, dishwashers, and on household surfaces. In one aspect, the disclosure provides methods for cleaning an item, wherein the methods comprise contacting said item with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing said composition off of said item. Another embodiment is directed to a method of laundering a textile or fabric, wherein the method comprises contacting a textile or fabric with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for an amount of time sufficient to prevent, reduce or remove soil from the textile and optionally rinsing the textile or fabric. In one embodiment, the method is a method for cleaning a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein on said fabric or surface; and b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or dishware. In one embodiment, the method is a method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes. In one aspect, the bath temperature of the cold program is below 25°C, preferably below about 22°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 30 minutes. In one aspect, the quick program comprises a wash lasting less than 15 minutes, preferably less than 10 minutes. In one aspect, the washing machine uses a cold cycle and the program lasts less than 60 minutes. In one aspect, the program uses less no more than 65 liters of water, preferably no more than 60 liters of water, more preferably no more than 50 liters of water. In one embodiment, the method is a method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes, wherein the treatment step comprises the addition of a cleaning composition to the wash cycle, and wherein the cleaning composition comprises a surfactant system and an adjunct comprising one or more of: additional enzymes, peroxy compounds, bleach activators, anti-redeposition agents, neutralizers, optical brighteners, foam inhibitors, chelators, bittering agents, dye transfer inhibitors, soil release agents, water softeners, electrolytes, pH regulators, anti-graying agents, anti-crease components, bleach agents, colorants, scents, processing aids and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the method is a method of facilitating stain removal from a fabric or textile comprising: a) applying to the fabric or textile directly an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process. In one aspect the fabric or textile is treated with said fermentate extract after the fabric or textile has been stained. In one aspect the laundry process comprises washing the fabric with a laundry detergent. In one embodiment, the method is a method of facilitating stain removal from a fabric wherein the stain comprises a carbohydrate and / or fat and a protein comprising the steps of: a) treating the fabric directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process. In one aspect, the treated fabric is stored for at least 15 minutes before step b). In one aspect, the laundry process takes place in the presence of a laundry detergent. In one embodiment, the method is a method of freshening a fabric comprising the step of treating the fabric with a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) cyclodextrins. In one aspect, the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising from 90% to 99.5% by weight of the composition of water. In one embodiment, the method is a method of freshening a fabric comprising the step of treating the fabric with a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) cyclodextrins, wherein the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising at least 0.001 %, preferably from 0.002% to 3% by weight of the composition of perfume, preferably wherein the perfume comprises at least 60% by weight of the perfume of perfume raw materials having ClogP greater than 1.0. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts, compositions, and methods provided herein have utility in a wide array of applications in which preventing, reducing, or removing soil is desired, such hard surface cleaning and dishware cleaning. In one embodiment, the method is a method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: (a) applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract described herein or a hard surface cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract onto said hard-surface or said object; (b) leaving said composition on said hard-surface or said object to act; optionally, wiping said hard-surface or object; and (c) rinsing said hard-surface or said object. In one embodiment, the method is a method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: a) applying a liquid composition comprising from 10 to 95 wt. % of liquid solvent, and from 0.01 to 90 wt.% of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract to the hard surface. b) agitating said composition on the hard surface with a non-absorbent means. In one aspect, the non-absorbent means is a non-absorbent cloth of a brush. In one embodiment, the method is a method of cleaning a dishware comprising: (a) applying a dishware detergent composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract on said dishware; and (b) rinsing said composition off of said dishware. In one embodiment, the method is a method of treating a fabric in a dryer, the method comprising the steps of: a) placing the fabric in the dryer; and b) delivering an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract into the dryer. In one aspect, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is delivered into the dryer from a solid carrier. In one aspect, the solid carrier is a dryer sheet or a solid pellet. The Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts, compositions, and methods provided herein also have applications in treating medical and dental surfaces, on catheters and implanted medical devices, on contact lenses, in medical instrument cleaning, and in wound dressings (wound healing fabrics). Another embodiment is directed to a method for cleaning an article, wherein the method comprises contacting the article with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract under conditions sufficient to reduce or remove microorganisms or a biofilm from the article, and optionally rinsing the article. General definitions The disclosures of all cited patent and non-patent literature are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In this disclosure, a number of terms and abbreviations are used. The following definitions apply unless specifically stated otherwise. As used herein, the articles “a”, “an”, and “the” preceding an element or component of the invention are intended to be nonrestrictive regarding the number of instances (i.e., occurrences) of the element or component. Therefore “a”, “an”, and “the” should be read to include one or at least one, and the singular word form of the element or component also includes the plural unless the number is obviously meant to be singular. When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given either as a range, preferred range, or a list of upper preferable values and lower preferable values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper range limit or preferred value and any lower range limit or preferred value, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range. The use of numerical values in the various ranges specified in this application, unless expressly indicated otherwise, are stated as approximations as though the minimum and maximum values within the stated ranges were both proceeded by the word “about”. In this manner, slight variations above and below the stated ranges can be used to achieve substantially the same results as values within the ranges. Also, the disclosure of these ranges is intended as a continuous range including each and every value between the minimum and maximum values. As used herein, the term “about” modifying the quantity of an ingredient or reactant employed refers to variation in the numerical quantity that can occur, for example, through typical measuring and liquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutions in the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures; through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredients employed to make the compositions or carry out the methods; and the like. The term “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”, the claims include equivalents to the quantities. The term “aqueous,” as used in the phrases “aqueous composition” and “aqueous environment” refers to a composition that is made up of at least 50% water. An aqueous composition may contain at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, or 99% water. As used herein, the term “biological contaminants” refers to one or more unwanted and / or pathogenic biological entities including, but not limited to, microorganisms, spores, viruses, prions, and mixtures thereof. As used herein, the term “comprising” means the presence of the stated features, integers, steps, or components as referred to in the claims, but that it does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components or groups thereof. The term “comprising” is intended to include embodiments encompassed by the terms “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of”. Similarly, the term “consisting essentially of” is intended to include embodiments encompassed by the term “consisting of”. As used herein, the term "cell lysate" or "lysate" refers to microbial cells which have been lysed by any suitable means. The term "cell lysate" or "lysate” conventionally denotes a material obtained after the destruction or dissolution of biological cells via a phenomenon known as cell lysis, thus giving rise to the release of the intracellular biological constituents naturally contained in the cells of the microorganism under consideration. For the purposes of the present disclosure, the term “lysate” is used without preference to denote the whole lysate obtained via lysis of the microorganism under consideration or only a fraction thereof. The lysate used is thus totally or partially formed from the intracellular biological constituents and from the constituents of the cell walls and membranes. A lysate used for the invention may be the whole lysate obtained via lysis of the microorganism under consideration, or a fraction thereof. This cell lysis may be accomplished by any suitable means or any one method known in the art, such as but not limiting to, an osmotic shock, a heat shock, ultrasonication, sonication, homogenization, shearing, chemical lysis or under a mechanical stress of centrifugation type. In some embodiments, the cell debris is removed from the cell lysate prior to use. In some embodiments the cell lysates are filtered or fractionated prior to use. As used herein, "cleaning" means applying to a surface for the purpose of cleaning. The terms “clean surface”, “clean textile” and “clean fabric” refer to a surface or textile or fabric respectively that has a percent stain removal of at least 10%, preferably at least 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, or 40% of a soiled surface or textile or fabric. As used herein, the term “embodiment” or “disclosure” is not meant to be limiting but applies generally to any of the embodiments defined in the claims or described herein. These terms are used interchangeably herein. As used herein, the term “excipient” refers to inactive substance used as a carrier for active ingredients, in a formulation. The excipient may be used to stabilize the active ingredient in a formulation, such as the storage stability of the active ingredient. Excipients are also sometimes used to bulk up formulations that contain active ingredients. As used herein, the term “effective amount” refers to the amount sufficient to obtain the desired effect. When used in conjunction with a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, term “effective amount” refers to the quantity of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract needed to achieve the desired level of cleaning and / or malodor control activity in the specified composition. Such effective amounts are readily ascertained by one of ordinary skill in the art and are based on many factors, such as the particular Brevibacillus fermentate extract that is used, the cleaning application, the specific composition of the cleaning composition, and whether a liquid or dry (e.g., granular, bar, powder, solid, liquid, tablet, gel, paste, foam, sheet, or unit dose) composition is required. As used herein, the term “fragrance effect” refers to the human perception of a fragrance on a washed item, such as a fabric (e.g. laundered clothing). The fragrance effect can be measured by GC-MS analysis and expressed quantitatively as a fragrance intensity. An increased fragrance effect can thus be expressed as an increased fragrance intensity, such that washing an item with a Brevibacillus fermentate extract and a fragrance or a composition comprising a Brevibacillus fermentate extract and a fragrance compared to a similar item not having been washed with the Brevibacillus fermentate extract and a fragrance, or compared to the same item prior to washing. As used herein, the term “fragrance” or “perfume” includes raw materials and compositions, accords, scents and oils, for example essential oils. A wide variety of chemicals are known for fragrance (i.e., perfume) uses, including compounds such as aldehydes, ketones and esters. Also naturally occurring plant and animal oils and exudates comprising complex mixtures of various chemical components are known for use as fragrances. A perfume may be a blend of volatile compounds with different volatilities which can bind to receptors in the nose and therefore has a smell or odor, usually a pleasant one. These compounds are also known as odorants or fragrances. Most perfumes possess molar weights of up to approximately 200 g / mol, in some cases up to about 300 g / mol. Larger molecules are not volatile enough to be perceived by the human nose. The volatility of a compound describes how readily it vaporizes by way of evaporation or boiling. Perfume compounds vaporize, depending on their volatility, by evaporation at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Volatility is often described using vapor pressure or boiling point, with a high vapor pressure or low boiling point indicating a high volatility. Although the volatility of a compound is related to its molecular weight, other factors such as structure and polarity also play a role, as does interaction between fragrance compounds. As used herein, the term “fabric” refers to, for example, woven, knit, and non-woven material, as well as staple fibers and filaments that can be converted to, for example, yarns and woven, knit, and non-woven fabrics. The term encompasses material made from natural, as well as synthetic (e.g., manufactured) fibers. As used herein, the term “metabolite(s) thereof” or “metabolite(s) of the microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention” or “metabolite actives” are used interchangeably and refer to any substance derived from the metabolism of a microorganism(s) suitable for use in the present invention. As used herein, the term "soluble metabolite" refers to a metabolite or metabolites present in the supernatant of a cell culture (fermentate supernatant) from which the cells have been removed. In one embodiment the cells are removed by centrifugation. In one embodiment the supernatant is filtered. It will be apparent that the supernatant may be used directly in the formulations of the present invention, or that one or more of the metabolites may be isolated form the supernatant by any suitable means prior to use. As used herein, the term “"Neutralize" or "neutralization" refers to the ability of a compound or product to reduce or eliminate malodorous compounds. Odor neutralization may be partial, affecting only some of the malodorous compounds in a given context, or affecting only part of a malodorous compound. A malodorous compound may be neutralized by chemical reaction resulting in a new chemical entity, by sequestration, by chelation, by association, or by any other interaction rendering the malodorous compound less malodorous or non-malodorous. Odor neutralization may be distinguished from odor masking or odor blocking by a change in the malodorous compound, as opposed to a change in the ability to perceive the malodor without any corresponding change in the condition of the malodorous compound. As used herein, the term “reducing”, “reduces” and grammatical variations thereof in relation to a particular trait, characteristic, feature, biological process, or phenomena refers to a decrease in the particular trait, characteristic, feature, biological process, or phenomena. The trait, characteristic, feature, biological process, or phenomena can be decreased by 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100% or greater than 100%. The terms “percent by weight”, “weight percentage (wt.%)” and “weight- weight percentage (% w / w)” are used interchangeably herein. Percent by weight refers to the percentage of a material on a mass basis as it is comprised in a composition, mixture, solution, or product. The terms “percent by volume”, “volume percentage” are used interchangeably herein. Percent by volume refers to the percentage of a material on a volume basis as it is comprised in a composition, mixture, solution, or product. The term “16S rRNA” or “16S ribosomal RNA” means the rRNA constituting the small subunit of prokaryotic ribosomes. In bacteria, this sequence can be used to identify and characterize operational taxonomic units. The term “ITS” or “Internal Transcribed Spacers” are regions within the ribosomal transcript that are excised and degraded during maturation. Their sequences can be used for phylogenetic analysis and / or identification of fungi or yeast. The term “percent (%) sequence identity” or “percent (%) sequence similarity,” as used herein with respect to a reference sequence is defined as the percentage of nucleotide residues in a candidate sequence that are identical to the residues in the reference polynucleotide sequence after optimal alignment of the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary, to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity. A microbial “strain” as used herein refers to a microorganism (such as a bacterium or fungus) which remains genetically unchanged when grown or multiplied. The multiplicity of identical microbes is included. As used herein, the term a “biologically pure strain” means a strain containing no other microbial strains in quantities sufficient to interfere with replication of the strain or to be detectable by normal techniques. “Isolated” when used in connection with the organisms and cultures described herein includes not only a biologically pure strain, but also any culture of organisms which is grown or maintained other than as it is found in nature. As used herein, the term “probiotic” or “probiotic microorganism” are used interchangeably herein and refer to a live microorganism (including bacteria or yeasts for example) which, when administered (topically or orally) in sufficient amounts, beneficially affects the host organism, i.e. by conferring one or more demonstrable benefits, such as a reduced dandruff condition, on the host organism. Whilst there are no lower or upper limits for probiotic use, it has been suggested that at least 106-1012, preferably at least 106-1010, preferably 108-109, cfu as a daily dose will be effective to achieve the beneficial effects in a subject. The term “sequence identity” or “sequence similarity” as used herein, means that two polynucleotide sequences, a candidate sequence and a reference sequence, are identical (i.e.100% sequence identity) or similar (i.e. on a nucleotide-by-nucleotide basis) over the length of the candidate sequence. In comparing a candidate sequence to a reference sequence, the candidate sequence may comprise additions or deletions (i.e. gaps) as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. Optimal alignment of sequences for determining sequence identity may be conducted using the any number of publicly available local alignment algorithms known in the art such as ALIGN or Megalign (DNASTAR), or by inspection. As used herein, “surface” means any surface, including hard, soft, and porous surfaces. As used herein, the term “hard surface” refers to any article having a hard surface including, but not limiting to, floors, tables, walls, roofs, metal, glass, ceramics, wood, minerals (rock, stone, marble, granite), aggregate materials such as concrete, plastics, composite materials, hard rubber materials, and gypsum, as well as surfaces of hard objects such as cars, ship hulls, dishes (dishware), medical instruments, pipes, reservoirs, or holding tanks. The hard surface materials may be finished with enamels and paints. Hard surfaces are found, for example in kitchen tiles, bathroom tiles, water treatment and storage equipment and tanks; dairy and food processing equipment and facilities; medical equipment and facilities, such as surgical instruments and permanent and temporary implants; industrial pharmaceutical equipment and plants. The term “hard surface” also includes the surfaces of flexible yet firm objects such as the insides of bendable tubing and supply lines or the surfaces of deformable holding tanks or vessels. The term “hard surface” includes also the surfaces in the interior of washing machines, such as the interior of laundry washing machines or dishwashing machines, this includes soap intake box, walls, windows, baskets, racks, nozzles, pumps, sump, filters, pipelines, tubes, joints, seals, gaskets, fittings, impellers, drums, drains, traps, coin traps inlet and outlets. The term hard surface does not encompass textile or fabric. Soft surfaces are, for example, hair and all types of textiles or fabrics. Porous surfaces also may be found in certain ceramics as well as in membranes that are used for filtration. Other surfaces include, but are not limited to, ship hulls and swimming pools. Other surfaces may be biological surfaces, such as skin, keratin or internal organs. The term “surfactant” refers to any compound generally recognized in the art as having surface active qualities. Surfactants generally include anionic, cationic, nonionic, and zwitterionic compounds, which are further described, herein. As used herein, the term “textile”, as used herein, refers to any textile material including yarns, yarn intermediates, fibers, non-woven materials, natural materials, synthetic materials, and any other textile material, fabrics made of these materials and products made from fabrics (e.g., garments and other articles). The textile or fabric may be in the form of knits, wovens, denims, non- wovens, felts, yarns, and towelling. The textile may be cellulose based such as natural cellulosics, including cotton, flax / linen, jute, ramie, sisal or coir or manmade cellulosics (e.g. originating from wood pulp) including viscose / rayon, cellulose acetate fibers (tricell), lyocell or blends thereof. The textile or fabric may also be non-cellulose based such as natural polyamides including wool, camel, cashmere, mohair, rabbit and silk or synthetic polymers such as nylon, aramid, polyester, acrylic, polypropylene and spandex / elastane, or blends thereof as well as blends of cellulose based and non-cellulose based fibers. Examples of blends are blends of cotton and / or rayon / viscose with one or more companion material such as wool, synthetic fiber (e.g. polyamide fiber, acrylic fiber, polyester fiber, polyvinyl chloride fiber, polyurethane fiber, polyurea fiber, aramid fiber), and / or cellulose-containing fiber (e.g. rayon / viscose, ramie, flax / linen, jute, cellulose acetate fiber, lyocell). Fabric may be conventional washable laundry. For example, stained household laundry. When the term fabric or garment is used, it is intended to include the broader term textiles as well. In the context of the present application, the term “textile” is used interchangeably with fabric and cloth. As used herein, the term “laundering” includes both household laundering and industrial laundering and means the process of treating textiles with a solution containing a cleaning or detergent composition as provided herein. The laundering process can for example be carried out using e.g. a household or an industrial washing machine or can be carried out by hand. As used herein, the term “wash cycle” refers to a washing operation in which textiles are immersed in a wash liquor, mechanical action of some kind is applied to the textile to release stains or to facilitate flow of wash liquor in and out of the textile and finally the superfluous wash liquor is removed. After one or more wash cycles, the textile is generally rinsed and dried. As used herein, the term “wash liquor” is defined herein as the solution or mixture of water and detergent components optionally including polypeptides having thermolysin activity and a perfume. It is intended that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Non-limiting examples of compositions and methods disclosed herein include: 1. A cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. 1b. A cleaning composition comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, wherein said fermentate prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. 2. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. 2b. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or embodiment 2, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus suitable for use in the present invention includes, but is not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. 3. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface. 3b.3. A malodor control composition comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, wherein said fernentate prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface. 4. The malodor control composition of embodiment 3, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. 4b. The malodor control composition of embodiment 3 or embodiment 4, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus is selected from the group consisting of a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus suitable for use in the present invention includes, but is not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 (SEQ ID NO: 1) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788. 5. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or 1b, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition. 5b. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or 1b, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition, wherein the additive is a laundry additive or dishwashing additive. 6. The malodor control composition of embodiment 3 or 3b, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition. 6b. The malodor control composition of embodiment 3 or 3b, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaner, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition, wherein the additive is a laundry additive or dishwashing additive. 7. The composition of embodiment 5, 5b, 6 or 6b, wherein the detergent composition is a laundry detergent composition or a dishware detergent composition. 8. A composition comprising the cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or 1b and the malodor control composition of embodiment 3 or 3b. 9. The composition of any one of the previous embodiments, further comprising an aqueous carrier. 10. The composition any one of the previous embodiments, further comprising an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a surfactant, an anti-redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, a rheology modifier, and any one combination thereof. 10b. The composition of embodiment 10, wherein the one or more cleaning enzymes selected from the group consisting of acyl transferases, alpha- amylases, beta-amylases, alpha-galactosidases, arabinosidases, aryl esterases, beta-galactosidases, carrageenases, catalases, cellobiohydrolases, cellulases, chondroitinases, cutinases, endo-beta-1, 4-glucanases, endo-beta- mannanases, esterases, exo-mannanases, feruloyl esterase, galactanases, glucoamylases, hemicellulases, hexosaminidases, hyaluronidases, keratinases, laccases, lactases, ligninases, lipases, lipoxygenases, mannanases, metalloproteases, nucleases (e.g. deoxyribonucleases and ribonucleases), oxidases, oxidoreductases, pectate lyases, pectin acetyl esterases, pectinases, pentosanases, perhydrolases, peroxidases, phenoloxidases, phosphatases, phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, phytases, polygalacturonases, polyesterases, proteases, pullulanases, reductases, rhamnogalacturonases, beta-glucanases, tannases, transglutaminases, xylan acetyl-esterases, xylanases, xyloglucanases, xylosidases, and any combination or mixture thereof. 11. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or embodiment 8 comprising from 0.0002% to 100% by weight or by volume of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. 11b. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1or embodiment 8 comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.0002%, 0.0005%, 0.001%, 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight of said composition. 11c. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or embodiment 8 comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at about 0.0002%, 0.0005%, 0.001%0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by volume of said composition. 12. The malodor control composition of embodiment 3 or embodiment 8 comprising from 0.0002% to 100% by weight or by volume of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. 12b. The cleaning composition of embodiment 3 or embodiment 8 comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at 0.0002%, 0.0005%, 0.001%, 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by weight of said composition. 12c. The cleaning composition of embodiment 1 or embodiment 8 comprising a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract at 0.0002%, 0.0005%, 0.001%, 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11.0%, 12.0%, 13.0%, 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 17.0%, 18.0%, 19.0%, 20.0%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25.0%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30.0%,31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35.0%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40.0%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45.0%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, 50.0%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or up to up to 100% by volume of said composition. 13. A laundry detergent composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on laundry. 13b. The laundry detergent composition of embodiment 13, wherein the composition is a liquid laundry detergent composition. 14. The laundry detergent composition of embodiment 13, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof. 15. The laundry detergent composition of embodiment 13, further comprising an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a surfactant, an anti-redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, a rheology modifier, and any one combination thereof. 16. A method for cleaning a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying a composition according to embodiment 1 on said fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or surface. 16b. A method for cleaning a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, on said fabric or surface; and b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or surface. 16c. A method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes. In one aspect, the bath temperature of the cold program is below 25°C, preferably below about 22°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 30 minutes. In one aspect, the quick program comprises a wash lasting less than 15 minutes, preferably less than 10 minutes. In one aspect, the washing machine uses a cold cycle and the program lasts less than 60 minutes. In one aspect, the program uses less no more than 65 liters of water, preferably no more than 60 liters of water, more preferably no more than 50 liters of water. 16d. A method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes, wherein the treatment step comprises the addition of a cleaning composition to the wash cycle, and wherein the cleaning composition comprises a surfactant system and an adjunct comprising one or more of: additional enzymes, peroxy compounds, bleach activators, anti-redeposition agents, neutralizers, optical brighteners, foam inhibitors, chelators, bittering agents, dye transfer inhibitors, soil release agents, water softeners, electrolytes, pH regulators, anti-graying agents, anti-crease components, bleach agents, colorants, scents, processing aids and mixtures thereof. 17. A method of facilitating stain removal from a fabric or textile comprising: a) treating the fabric or textile directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and, b) subsequently subjecting the fabric or textile to a laundry process. 18. The method of embodiment 17, wherein the fabric is treated with said fermentate extract after the fabric has been stained. 19. The method according to embodiment 17 wherein the laundry process comprises washing the fabric with a laundry detergent. 19b. A method of facilitating stain removal from a fabric wherein the stain comprises a carbohydrate and / or fat and a protein comprising the steps of: a) treating the fabric directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process. In one aspect, the treated fabric is stored for at least 15 minutes before step b). In one aspect, the laundry process takes place in the presence of a laundry detergent. 19c. A method of freshening a fabric comprising the step of treating the fabric with a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) cyclodextrins. In one aspect, the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising from 90% to 99.5% by weight of the composition of water. 19d. A method of freshening a fabric comprising the step of treating the fabric with a fabric freshening composition comprising: a) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for preventing, reducing and / or removing a malodor on a fabric or surface; and, b) cyclodextrins, wherein the fabric freshening composition is an aqueous composition comprising at least 0.001 %, preferably from 0.002% to 3% by weight of the composition of perfume, preferably wherein the perfume comprises at least 60% by weight of the perfume of perfume raw materials having ClogP greater than 1.0. 20. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an item comprising: a) contacting an item with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing said composition off of said item. 20b. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying a composition composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract described herein, on said fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or dishware. 21. A method of malodor removal from a fabric or textile comprising: a) treating the fabric or textile directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and, b) subsequently subjecting the fabric or textile to a laundry process. 21b. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface in a wash liquor comprising: a) providing a first washing cycle by contacting the fabric or surface with a wash bath wherein the wash bath comprises a low dose of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing the fabric; and, b) repeat the washing cycle of (a) multiple times until a prevention, reduction or removal of the malodor on said fabric or surface is observed. 22. A method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: (a) applying the hard surface cleaning composition of embodiment 5 onto said hard-surface or said object; (b) leaving said composition on said hard-surface or said object to act; optionally, wiping said hard-surface or object; and (c) optionally rinsing said hard-surface or said object. 22b. A method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: (a) applying the hard surface cleaning composition of embodiment 5 onto said hard-surface or said object; and, (b) leaving said composition on said hard-surface or said object to act; optionally, wiping said hard-surface or object. 22c. A method for the cleaning of a hard surface comprising: a) applying a liquid composition comprising from 10 to 95 wt. % of liquid solvent, and from 0.01 to 90 wt. % of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract to the hard surface; b) agitating said composition on the hard surface with a non-absorbent means. 22d. The method according to embodiment 22b wherein the non-absorbent means is a non-absorbent cloth of a brush. 23. A method of cleaning a dishware comprising: (a) applying a dishware detergent composition according to embodiment 7 on said dishware; and (b) rinsing said composition off of said dishware. 24. A dishwashing detergent composition comprising: (a) from about 0.1% to about 20% by weight of the total composition of a chelant; (b) from about 5% to about 80% by weight of the total composition of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic, semi-polar nonionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof; and (c) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes soil on dishware. 25. A hard surface cleaning composition comprising: (a) an acidic component; (b) a surfactant selected from the group consisting of nonionic surfactants, anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants; amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof; (c) a surface modifying polymer; and, (d) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on said hard surface. 25b. A hard surface cleaning composition comprising: (a) a basic component; (b) a surfactant selected from the group consisting of nonionic surfactants, anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants; amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, and mixtures thereof; (c) a surface modifying polymer; and, (d) an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on said hard surface 26. A liquid hard surface cleaning composition comprising from 10 to 95 wt. % of liquid solvent, and from 0.01 to 90 wt. % of an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. 27. The liquid hard surface cleaning composition of embodiment 26 wherein the pH of the liquid hard surface cleaning composition is at least 8. 28. A method of treating a fabric in a dryer, the method comprising the steps of: a) placing the fabric in the dryer; and, b) delivering an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract into the dryer. 28b. The method of embodiment 28, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is delivered into the dryer from a solid carrier. 28c. The method of embodiment 28, wherein the solid carrier is a dryer sheet or a solid pellet. 29. A dryer sheet comprising a substrate, a fabric treatment composition and an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. 29b. The dryer sheet according to embodiment 29, wherein the substrate is non-woven. 29c. The dryer sheet according to embodiment 29, wherein the substrate comprises at least a first layer and a second layer and preferably a plurality of embossments in the first layer and the second layer through which the fermentate extract penetrates said first layer and said second layer. 30. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor formation on a wound dressing. 31. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor formation on an incontinence product. 31b. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor formation on a feminine hygiene product. 31c. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract and at least one phosphodiesterase, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface. 31d. A cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus fermentate extract and at least one dispersin, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface. 32. A method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes. 33. A method for cleaning a fabric in a washing machine using a cold and / or a quick program, comprising the treatment step of contacting the fabric with a treatment liquor comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract wherein the cold program comprises a wash having a bath temperature below 30°C and / or the quick program lasts less than 40 minutes, wherein the treatment step comprises the addition of a cleaning composition to the wash cycle, and wherein the cleaning composition comprises a surfactant system and an adjunct comprising one or more of: additional enzymes, peroxy compounds, bleach activators, anti-redeposition agents, neutralizers, optical brighteners, foam inhibitors, chelators, bittering agents, dye transfer inhibitors, soil release agents, water softeners, electrolytes, pH regulators, anti-graying agents, anti-crease components, bleach agents, colorants, scents, processing aids and mixtures thereof. 34. An animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter. 35. An animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition is selected from the group of a liquid composition, a dry composition, an aerosol composition, and any one combination thereof. 36. An animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition is an additive for litter. 37. An animal litter malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter, wherein the composition further comprises a compound selected from the group consisting of a non-aqueous volatile carrier, and any one combination thereof. 38. An odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance said particles being contacted with a composition comprising the animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37. 39. An odor control animal litter comprising an animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37, wherein the litter is composed of hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. 40. An odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance, said particles being contacted with a composition comprising the animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37, further comprising an adjunct selected from dyes, fragrances, pigments, dedusting compounds, acids, and mixtures thereof. 41. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a litter comprising applying directly to said litter an animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37. 42. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a litter comprising applying directly to said litter an animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37, wherein the litter is composed of hay, straw, sawdust, wood chips, wood shavings, wood pellets, corn con bedding, paper bedding, oat hulls, alfalfa (usually pressed or agglomerated), and clay minerals such as kaolinites or montmorillonites. 43. A method for making an malodor control animal litter, the method comprising applying to a litter an animal litter malodor control composition of embodiments 34-37. 44. An animal waste malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said animal waste. 45. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an animal waste or an animal litter comprising said animal waste, the method comprising applying to said animal waste or an animal litter comprising said animal waste an animal waste malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said animal waste or said animal litter. 46. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an animal waste, the method comprising applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising said extract, to a surface on which one or more animal is housed, wherein said extract or composition comprising said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor from said animal waste. EXAMPLES In the following Examples, unless otherwise stated, parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating embodiments of the disclosure, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications of the disclosure to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. The following abbreviations in the specification correspond to units of measure, techniques, properties, or compounds as follows: “sec” or “s” means second(s), “min” means minute(s), “h” or “hr” means hour(s), “mL” means microliter(s), “mL” means milliliter(s), “L” means liter(s), “mM” means millimolar, “M” means molar, “mmol” means millimole(s), “uM” or “µM” means micromolar, “ppm” means part(s) per million, “wt” means weight, “wt%” means weight percent, “g” means gram(s), “mg” means milligram(s), “mg” means microgram(s), “ng” means nanogram(s), “conc.” means concentration, “Trt” means treatment. EXAMPLE 1 Brevibacillus strains Brevibacillus suitable for use in the present invention includes, but are not limited to, a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149108; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of non-sporulating Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 (derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus G2) deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785; a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149786; and a Brevibacillus laterosporus having a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence displaying at least 97.0% sequence similarity to a 16S ribosomal RNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149788; Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 was isolated from a facial skin microbiome library prepared by swabbing the surface of facial skin, transferring to phosphate-buffered saline and serially diluted. Serial dilutions were plated onto petri dishes containing TSA (17g Tryptone, 3 g Soytone, 5 g NaCl, 2.5 g dipotassium phosphate, 2.5 g glucose, 15 g agar per liter distilled water) media. Plates were then incubated aerobically at 33 ºC until colonies became visible. Isolated colonies were the source for PCR reactions using standard protocols. The phylogenetic identity of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 was determined by sequencing the 16S region with primer set A (SEQ ID NO: 2) where “M” is nucleotide Adenine or Cytosine and primer set B (SEQ ID NO: 3). Isolation of an endospore deficient strain^ Brevibacillus laterosporus is a rod-shaped, endospore-forming bacterium. It is not, however, desirable for endospores to be present in a final product or waste from industrial production. Therefore, it is preferred that the Brevibacillus laterosporus production strain is incapable of forming endospores. Eliminating endospore production was accomplished using a homologous recombination vector targeting the Stage II, sporulation protein E (spoIIE)gene of Brevibacillus laterosporus (SEQ ID NO: 4). The spoIIE locus of Bacillus subtilis is required for formation of a normal endospore through activation of the transcription factor sigma F (Barák I., Behari J., Olmedo G., Guzmán P., Brown D., Castro E., Walker D., Westpheling J., & Youngman P. (1996) Structure and function of the Bacillus SpoIIE protein and its localization to sites of sporulation septum assembly. Mol Microbiol.19(5):1047-60.). A truncated spoIIE gene was synthesized, by eliminating the first 600 bp, beginning with the initiation codon (SEQ ID NO: 5; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). The truncated gene was assembled into an integration vector (Leenhouts, K. J., et. al, 1991, Plasmid, 26(1), 55-66; Maguin, E., et al. ,1992. J Bacteriol, 174(17), 5633-5638). Successful integration, resulting in truncation of the spoIIE gene, was determined by PCR using the primer set primer set A2 (SEQ ID NO: 6) and primer set B2 (SEQ ID NO: 7). The deleted spoIIE sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The absence of endospore production in the knockout strain was determined visually following growth in spore induction media and compared to the parent Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 strain (overnight cultures in TSB media were harvested by centrifugation and inoculated into sporulation medium (8 g / L Nutrient broth, 1 g / L KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM Ca(NO3)2, 10 μM MnCl2, 1 μM FeSO4). Cells were grown at 33°C with agitation (200 rpm) and observed for production of spores after 48 hours). The spoIIE deletions strain, demonstrated to be endospore deficient, was designated Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 and deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149109. Knockout of non-essential genes in Brevibacillus laterosporus Brevibacillus laterosporus strains contains genes associated with antibiotic resistance. In one aspect, elimination of genes that may confer resistance to antibiotics is desired, especially for Brevibacillus laterosporus production strains (strains used for large scale / commercial production of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentates). Eliminating a series of genes related to Vancomycin resistance was accomplished using a homologous recombination vector targeting the entire operon (SEQ ID NO: 8) in Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 (CBS14109). A synthetic section of DNA was synthesized, corresponding to the genome directly upstream of the Vancomycin resistance genes linked directly to the downstream section, such that the synthetic sequence eliminates all intervening sequences containing the genes (SEQ ID NO: 9; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). The synthetic DNA construct was assembled into an integration vector (Leenhouts, K. J., et. al, 1991, Plasmid, 26(1), 55-66; Maguin, E., et al. ,1992. J Bacteriol, 174(17), 5633-5638). Successful assembly of the synthetic construct into the integration vector was determined by PCR using the primer set primer set A3 (SEQ ID NO: 10) and primer set B3 (SEQ ID NO: 11). The deleted Vancomycin resistance operon sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing using the same primers (SEQ ID NO: 10 and SEQ ID NO: 11). Additional genes, potentially related to Vancomycin resistance, were removed using a homologous recombination vector targeting the location within the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 genome (SEQ ID NO: 12). A synthetic section of DNA was synthesized, corresponding to the genome directly upstream of the putative Vancomycin resistance genes linked directly to the downstream section, such that the synthetic sequence eliminates all intervening sequences containing the genes (SEQ ID NO: 13; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). Successful assembly of the synthetic construct into the integration vector was determined by PCR using the primer set primer set C (SEQ ID NO: 14) and primer set D (SEQ ID NO: 15). The deleted Vancomycin resistance operon sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing using the same primers (SEQ ID NO: 14 and SEQ ID NO: 15). Brevibacillus laterosporus strains also contains genes associated with a virulence factor (Cytolysin). In one aspect, elimination of cytolysin genes is desired, especially for Brevibacillus laterosporus production strains. The cytolysin gene (SEQ ID NO: 16) was removed using a homologous recombination vector targeting its location within the Brevibacillus laterosporus genome. A synthetic section of DNA was synthesized, corresponding to the genome directly upstream of the cytolysin gene linked directly to the downstream section, such that the synthetic sequence eliminates all intervening sequence containing the genes (SEQ ID NO: 17; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). The synthetic DNA construct was assembled into an integration vector (Leenhouts, K. J., et. al, 1991, Plasmid, 26(1), 55-66; Maguin, E., et al. ,1992. J Bacteriol, 174(17), 5633-5638). Successful assembly of the synthetic construct into the integration vector was determined by PCR using the primer set primer set E (SEQ ID NO: 18) and primer set F (SEQ ID NO: 19). The deleted Vancomycin resistance operon sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing using the same primers (SEQ ID NO: 18 and SEQ ID NO: 19). Three Vancomycin and cytolysin deletions strains (confirmed by DNA sequencing as described above) were isolated from the last step of the three consecutive knockouts. The three strains were designated Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS311, Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS317, and Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321, respectively, and deposited at Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WFDB) under number CBS149785, CBS149786, CBS149788, respectively. EXAMPLE 2 Fermentates of Brevibacillus laterosporus Brevibacillus laterosporus strains were grown in TSB media (1.7% Tryptone, 0.3% Soytone, 0.25% Glucose, 0.5% sodium chloride, 0.25% Potassium phosphate Dibasic) in 250 ml baffled shake-flasks and incubated at 33 ºC, 250 RPM for 16-18 hours. Following the 16 to18-hour incubation, cells were transferred to fresh TSB media with optionally added glucose (10 g / L) or M9 media (0.64% Na2HPO4-7H2O, 0.15% KH2PO4, 0.025% NaCl, 0.05% NH4Cl, 10% glucose) or M9 media + Maltodextrin (0.64% Na2HPO4-7H2O, 0.15% KH2PO4, 0.025% NaCl, 0.05% NH4Cl, 10% Maltodextrin) or M9 media + Maltodextrin + urea (0.64% Na2HPO4-7H2O, 0.15% KH2PO4, 0.025% NaCl, 0.05% NH4Cl, 10% Maltodextrin, 5% urea) in 2L baffled flasks (final volume of 400 mL) to an optical density (absorbance at 600 nm), of 0.3. Cells were grown at 33 ºC and 90 RPM using AirOtop seals for 48 hours. Optionally the scale of the fermentation volume can be reduced or the length of fermentation can be increased to up to 4 days. To obtain larger volumes of fermentation broth (fermentate), fermentations were carried out in 500 mL bioreactors, 2L fermentation tanks, or 14L fermentation tanks. In the case of larger fermentation tanks, an antifoam such as Foamblast ® 882, Dystar International can be used. Brevibacillus laterosporus strains can be grown in any media that allows for cell growth. The fermentate (fermentation broth with mixture of culture medium and cells) was collected from the growth vessel after 48 hours incubation. It is understood that the fermentate can be collected at different hours of incubation and still produce a fermentate that contains an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. EXAMPLE 3 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts Extracts of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentates were obtained as described below. Cell free supernatants of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate Cells were removed from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, by pelleting cells (centrifuge at 4,000 to 8,000 x g) and passing the supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter, to obtain an essentially cell-free supernatant. Cell pellet extracts of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate was obtained by pelleting cells (centrifuge at 4,000 to 8,000 x g) and pouring off the supernatant, to leave behind the portion of cell pellet. The pellet was resuspended in acidic water (1 / 10 v / v) to a pH 2.0 – 4.0, vortexed, pelleted by centrifugation (4,000 to 8,000 x g) and the extract liquid was passed through a 0.2 µM filter. Starting from a cell pellet has the advantage that the volume of the resuspension liquid (extract volume) can be determined to produce an effective amount of the active extract and / or further concentrated to produce an effective amount of the active extract. Furthermore, resuspending the pellet in water or non-fermentation broth liquids, results in reducing or eliminating the non-active ingredients of the fermentation broth which may interfere with the actives of the cell pellet extract. Combination of Cell free supernatant and Cell pellet extracts of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts were also produced by combining the cell free supernatant fraction described above with the cell pellet extract described above. Whole broth Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts To obtain a whole broth fermentate extract, the Brevibacillus laterosporus ferment extract was prepared by first adjusting the pH of the fermentate (total fermentation broth prepared as describe in Example 2) to a pH 2.0 - 4.0 prior to pelleting out the insoluble cellular matter and filtering supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter to yield a pH adjusted cell free supernatant. The preferred acid to make the pH adjustment is hydrochloric acid, although any acid capable of adjusting the fermentation broth pH to 2.5 can be used. In preparing the whole broth fermentate extract of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate in this way, it comprises the actives present in both the cell free supernatant and cell pellet extract described above. Alternatively, the Brevibacillus laterosporus whole broth fermentate extract can be prepared by first adjusting the pH of the fermentate (total fermentation broth) to an alkaline pH prior to pelleting out the insoluble cellular matter and optionally filtering supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter to yield a cell free supernatant (also referred to as “whole broth fermentate extract”). EXAMPLE 4 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a malodor control component providing fabric malodor control imparted through a wash bath in the absence of a detergent A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. To assemble the wash bath, a dilution of a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract was added to tap water. No detergent was added to the wash bath as the objective was to determine if the malodor control component from the cell pellet extract could be transferred to the fabric via a wash bath. Multiple dilutions of pellet extract were used to gain an understanding of relative amounts required for odor control on various fabric types. All samples used the same pellet extract for comparison. The Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract was contacted with the fabric in a Launder-Ometer® (SDL Atlas M228AA) washing cycle set to 1 cycle at 25°C for 45 minutes. A 500 mL canister was used containing 250 mL wash bath liquid, with 5 g of fabric and 15 metal beads. In the tables below, washes using the Launder-Ometer® are abbreviated LOM. After washing, fabric samples were allowed to dry overnight on the bench top. When they were dry, the fabric sample was cut into 1 g pieces and subjected to a milk test (International Antimicrobial Council Biofouling of Textiles from Pasteurized Cows’ Milk Technical Note). A 1 g piece of fabric was placed into a glass vial (plastic interferes with the sensory reading) and “inoculated” with 1 mL of skim milk (not organic) or 1 mL of prepared Nestle Carnation non-fat milk powder (prepared 20% w / w). Alternatively, the test can be performed with any amount of fabric and milk at a ratio of 1:1 (w / v). The fabric samples were incubated for 24 hours, or more often 48 hours at a temperature between 37 ºC and 33 °C before being sniffed by a researcher. The odor of the sample was judged based on character and intensity. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5, with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Control samples were samples of the same fabric that were not contacted with the Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract but were exposed to the same washing as described above. A character of 3 and an intensity of 3 or greater was common for controls. Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged in the tables below. Table 1. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric washed with Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract after incubation with milk for 24 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g cotton Milk Test Odor Rating after 24h incubation fabric without detergent Table 2. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract incubated with milk for 48 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g cotton Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation Table 3. Milk test odor rating for polyester fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract and incubated with milk for 24 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g polyester Milk Test Odor Rating after 24h incubation fabric without detergent . laterosporus cell pellet extract and incubated with milk for 48 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g polyester Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation f i ih Table 5. Milk test odor rating for nylon fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract and incubated with milk for 48 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g nylon Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation y 0 (Control) 3 3.3 Fail Fail Table 6. Milk test odor rating for denim fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract and incubated with milk for 24 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g denim Milk Test Odor Rating after 24h incubation f bri with t d t r nt y Table 7. Milk test odor rating for denim fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract after incubating with milk for 48 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g denim Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation To determine if the malodor control component had some durability on the fabric, the cotton samples were left on the bench top near a sunny window for more than a month before retesting with the milk test. The results mimic storage in an open closet before wearing a garment. Since odor was most pronounced at 48 hours, only a 48-hour timepoint was taken. This test was completed in triplicate. Table 8. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract stored for at least one month after washing and prior to testing. During testing, the fabric was inoculated with milk for 48 hours. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g cotton Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation f bri with t d t r nt At a month and a half, a similar long-term study was completed on polyester fabric. This test was completed in quadruplicate (Table 9). Table 9. Milk test odor rating for polyester fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract and stored for at least one month prior to testing. During testing the fabric was incubated with milk for 48 hours. 25C LOM Wash -- 5g polyester Milk Test Odor Ratin after 48h incubation y 1:500 2.5 0.5 Fail Pass 1:1000 2.0 1.2 Pass Pass treated fabric was completed for polyester using two additional batches of pellet extract. These samples were completed in triplicate. Table 10. Milk test odor rating for polyester fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus malodor component and stored for at least one month prior to testing. During the test, the polyester fabric was incubated for 48 hours with milk. 25C LOM Wash – 5g Odor Odor Odor Odor er Tables 1-10 clearly demonstrate that a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can function as a malodor control component providing malodor control imparted through a wash bath with no detergent for different fabrics including, but not limiting, to cotton, polyester, nylon, and denim. EXAMPLE 5 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract functions as a malodor control component providing fabric malodor control imparted through a wash bath in the presence of a detergent A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. With odor control demonstrated on cotton, polyester, nylon, and denim imparted through a wash bath with no detergent (Example 4), the next step was to determine if the addition of a detergent impacted odor control. To assemble the wash bath a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract was diluted 1:100 in tap water. Tide Free and Gentle (Tide F&G) detergent was added to the wash bath at a final concentration of 0.23%. The pH of the wash bath was adjusted to pH 9.0 to reflect the pH of regular laundry wash baths. Cotton swatches were tested for malodor using the milk test as previously described (Example 4). Samples were evaluated for odor after 48 hours at 33 °C. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0- 2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged (Table 11). Table 11. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract in a detergent containing wash bath. 25°C LOM Wash -- Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation Table 11 demonstrates that the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can function as a malodor control component in the presence of a commercial detergent. EXAMPLE 6 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract does not impair cleaning ability of commercial laundry detergents Human sebum is one of the more difficult stains to remove from a garment. The industry has developed an ASTM method D4265 for evaluating the removal of sebum from a stained swatch of fabric, which can be used to compare stain removal between wash bath conditions. To enhance visualization of the sebum removal, one of several staining methods including carbon black, dust, and dyes, can be incorporated into the sebum when staining the fabric. Due to the industry wide use of the sebum coated textile swatches, stains are commercially available. After washing and air drying the fabric, the color of the sebum coated side of the fabric is read using a colorimeter measuring L, a, and b values. The L, a, and b values are part of the CIELAB color space and can be used to calculate a stain removal index as described in the ASTM method. The stain removal index (SRI) compares samples of sebum stained, unstained, and sebum stained then washed fabrics to generate an index to evaluate stain removal. An SRI of 0 means that no stain was removed when compared to the original stained fabric, while an SRI of 100 means that all of the stain was removed, and the washed swatch now matches the original unstained fabric. The effect of the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 cell pellet extract on the cleaning ability of a wash bath containing Tide Coldwater detergent was analyzed using cotton and polyester swatches. Three cotton swatches (CFT C- S-94) and 3 polyester swatches (CFT P-S-94) were used, each coated with a sebum stain according to the ASTM method. The swatches were 2 x 2 inches wide with a pinked edge. The exact weight of the swatches varied somewhat, but was close to 1.6 g. The remaining 5 g of fabric was made from clean ballast fabrics, the weight of which was split between polyester and cotton. Sebum coated swatches and clean ballast fabric were placed into a 250 mL wash bath along with 15 stainless steel beads. To make up the wash bath, the cell pellet extract was diluted 1:100 in tap water and Tide Coldwater detergent was added at a concentration of 0.23%. The final pH of the wash bath was 9.0. The washing was completed at 25 °C for 45 minutes using a Launder-Ometer® (SDL Atlas M228AA). Afterwards, the sebum coated swatches were rinsed with water and dried overnight on the bench top and evaluated the next day. A colorimeter was used to analyze the cleanliness of the fabric swatches and the SRI for each sample was determined. Table 12. Stain Removal Index (SRI) for Sebum Dust Swatches Washed with Tide Coldwater with and without the addition of the Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract. (Std =standard deviation) Std. Std Polyester Polyester Cotton Cotton , , laterosporus fermentate extract (e.g. the malodor control component) did not affect the stain removal (cleaning capability) of the detergent in the wash bath. EXAMPLE 7 Effect of wash bath pH on efficacy of Brevibacillus malodor control component through a wash bath in the absence of a detergent To evaluate the efficacy of malodor control in a wash bath at different pH levels, the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 cell pellet extract was diluted 1:100 in tap water to a final volume of 250 mL. The wash bath was then either left at pH 4.2 or the pH was adjusted to pH 9.0. Five grams of cotton were washed in the respective wash bath at 25 °C for 45 min (see Example 4). A wash bath with only water at the same pH was used as a control. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged (Tables 13-14). Table 13. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric washed with a Brevibacillus laterosporus cell pellet extract in a wash bath of pH 4.2. 25°C LOM Wash -- 5g cotton fabric Milk Test Odor Rating after 48 h incubation y . laterosporus cell pellet extract in a wash bath of pH 9.0. 25°C LOM Wash -- f i Milk T R i f 4 h i i y As shown in Tables 13 and 14, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (e.g. malodor control component) showed good malodor control at both pH 4.2 and pH 9.0. The pH does not have an impact on the efficacy of the malodor control component on cotton. Given that many laundry detergents have an optimal basic pH, the data shown in Table 14 indicated that the malodor control component remains fully active at basic pH. EXAMPLE 8 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract sebum removal (cleaning) from soiled textile swatches A cell free supernatant from the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. In this experiment the cell free supernatant of Brevibacillus laterosporus (e.g. Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract) was adjusted to a laundry relevant pH of 9-9.5. One gram of fabric was placed in a 50-mL wash bath in a Launder-Ometer® canister. Three metal beads were added, and the fabric was washed at 25°C for 45 minutes using a Launder-Ometer® (SDL Atlas M228AA). The fabric chosen for this experiment was sebum dust on cotton (CFT-C-S-94). The fabric was dried overnight after washing. The measurement used to assess sebum stain removal on the fabric is the L*a*b values (measurements of color and light / darkness) identified through the Mach 5 Colorimeter. These values are used to calculate the Stain Removal Index (SRI) as described in the ASTM Method (See Example 6). Table 15. Stain Removal Index for common detergents, detergent packages, Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, and controls Solution SRI(measure of cleaning) Table 15 shows similar SRI values for several batches of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant) produced in both rich and minimal medias. This suggests that the cleaning of sebum from swatches is simultaneously repeatable and independent of other media components that may remain after the fermentation is complete. Additionally, these values are similar to the commercial laundry surfactant pre-formulation package and close to a fully formulated commercial laundry detergent’s ability to clean sebum from fabric. The relatively low SRI values from deionized water and rich and minimal media indicate that there is no pH dependance creating the cleaning effect. Additionally, there are no other components of the media that might be contributing to sebum cleaning in a large part. EXAMPLE 9 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract sebum removal (cleaning) from soiled textile swatches in the presence of additional laundry detergent formulation components The purpose of these experiments was to determine if laundry detergent formulation components impacted the ability of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract to clean sebum from a textile swatch. A cell free supernatant from the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. In this experiment, an orbital shaker (referred to as mini Launder-Ometer) was used; each test condition included 25 mL of wash water in a 50 mL conical vial with a single sebum-coated swatch (CFT C-S-94 or CFT P-S-94) and 3 stainless steel beads placed on an orbital shaker with the same mixing motion as the full scale Launder-Ometer®. Fabric swatches were then rinsed 3x with deionized water and left on the benchtop to dry overnight. Colorimetric readings of L* a* b* values were taken in triplicate using a MACH 5. These values are used to calculate the Stain Removal Index (SRI) as described in Example 6. Table 16. Stain Removal Index for commercial surfactant package, Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant), and combination thereof. SRI Value Cell free supernatant pH adjusted 9.3 40.48 31.50 alone, the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant) alone, and a combination of the surfactant package and the cell free supernatant. An increase in SRI correlated with improved cleaning. For sebum stain on polyester, there was an improvement in the SRI when the cell free supernatant was used in combination with the surfactant package. In the next set of experiments, formulated commercial laundry detergents, Persil Non-Bio and Tide Free & Gentle, were used to evaluate the effect of formulation ingredients on the impact of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant) to clean sebum from textile swatches. If no noticeable decrease in sebum cleaning ability is observed, this indicates that the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is compatible with those components and can be used in formulations containing those ingredient classes. Table 17. Ingredients and Function in the commercial Laundry Detergent Persil Non-Bio. Ingredient Function Parfum Fragrance Aziridine homopolymer ethoxylated Anti-redeposition Agent Table 18. Ingredients and Function in the commercial Laundry Detergent Tide Free and Gentle. Ingredient Function (C10-C16) Alcohol ethoxylate, sulfated, Surfactant sodium salt classes used to build a commercial laundry detergent including solvents, surfactants, polymers, hydrotropes, sequesterants, chelating agents, fragrances, anti-redeposition agents, opacifiers, optical brighteners, preservatives, pH adjusters, antifoaming agents, emulsion stabilizers, emulsifiers, viscosity adjusters, enzymes, enzyme stabilizers, processing aids and cleaning agents. Washing studies were performed in a Launder-Ometer® (ATLAS) using 500mL individual canisters containing 5g fabric per 250-mL of solution as described in Example 6. A total of 6 wash baths were prepared for each experiment: Persil Non-bio or Tide Free & Gentle detergent were prepared as a 0.23% solution in deionized water; 250-mL Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant) samples were prepared at either 100% or 10% in tap water or with 0.23% detergent in tap water for a total of four test cases. Cell free supernatant was pH adjusted to 9.3 prior to preparing the test wash baths. Colorimetric readings of L* a* b* values were taken in triplicate using a MACH 5. These values are used to calculate the Stain Removal Index (SRI) as described in the ASTM Method. Table 19. Stain Removal Index (SRI) Values of Fabric Swatches Coated in Sebum Dust on Polyester and Cotton washed through a Launder-Ometer® with Persil Non-Bio Detergent, Cell Free Supernatant or in Combination. SRI Value Table 19 demonstrates that SRI values were comparable between Persil Non-Bio detergent control and Persil Non-Bio detergent containing 100% or 10% cell free supernatant in both polyester and cotton, suggesting that the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is compatible with components present in a commercial laundry detergent and does not show a detrimental effect. Table 20. Stain Removal Index (SRI) Values of Fabric Swatches Coated in Sebum Dust on Polyester and Cotton washed through a Launder-Ometer® with Tide Free & Gentle Detergent, Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract (cell free supernatant) or in Combination. SRI Value Sam le Pol ester Cotton a e emonstrates t at vaues were compara e etween e Free & Gentle detergent control and Tide Free & Gentle detergent containing 100% or 10% cell free supernatant in both polyester and cotton, suggesting that the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is compatible with components present in a commercial laundry detergent and does not show a detrimental effect. EXAMPLE 10 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract as a malodor control spray on damp fabrics or soft surfaces The purpose of the experiment was to test if the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate extract can be used as a spray for the prevention of malodor after washing and during drying or storage of fabric. This is particularly relevant in areas with high humidity where laundry is dried manually inside or outside as opposed to a drying machine and can develop a musty smell during the drying process. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. In this experiment 1g of cotton or polyester fabric were sprayed with pellet extract using a plastic spray bottle. Three sprays per fabric swatch were applied. The cell pellet extract was used at a 1:10 dilution at pH 8.0 and undiluted at pH 10.0. Water was sprayed as a control. Fabric swatches were dried at room temperature for 10 min and then exposed to 1 mL of prepared carnation instant milk in a glass vial (see Example 4). Samples were incubated for 48 hours at 33 °C. A sensory odor test was performed to assess the malodor of each fabric swatch. The odor of the sample was judged based on character and intensity. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. Samples were prepared in triplicate and the average ratings are included in the tables below. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged in the tables below. Table 21. Milk test odor rating for polyester fabric swatches sprayed with cell pellet extract at full concentration and a 1:10 dilution. Polyester fabric Milk Test Odor Rating after 48h incubation Table 22. Milk test odor rating for cotton fabric swatches sprayed with cell pellet extract at full concentration and a 1:10 dilution Cotton fabric Milk Test Odor Rating after 48 h incubation containing the cell pellet extract reduced and or prevented the formation of malodor. This indicates that Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can be used as a spray to prevent the formation of malodor on textiles, fabrics, and other soft surfaces. EXAMPLE 11 Combination of phosphodiesterase and Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for malodor control The effect of combining phosphodiesterase (an enzyme that can help with control of “body grime”) with Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate extract for malodor control was investigated. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. A Launder-Ometer® (LOM) was used to wash textiles in the presence of either phosphodiesterase, Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a combination of the two. The level of phosphodiesterase granules is approximately 1% in a formulated laundry detergent. The level of detergent used in the ASTM method D4265 is 0.23% of the wash bath. Therefore, 5.75 mg of phosphodiesterase granules were used in a 250 mL wash bath. Clean polyester or cotton fabric was washed in the LOM with either the Pristine granules (commercial product of phosphodiesterase) as described above or 1:100 dilution of the cell pellet extract, or a combination of both the cell pellet extract and the Pristine granules. Cotton and polyester fabrics were washed separately. At the conclusion of the washing, the fabrics were allowed to air dry overnight before a milk test was conducted (See Example 4). The inoculated fabrics samples were done in duplicate and placed in a 33 ºC oven for 48 hours. At the conclusion of the test, the vials were opened and sniffed by a researcher. Each sample was scored based on odor character and strength. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. Samples were prepared in triplicate and the average ratings are included in the tables below. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Table 23. Sensory evaluation of milk test for polyester fabrics washed with either Pristine granules, a 1:100 dilution of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a combination of the two. Sample washed Average Average Odor r As shown in table 23, the addition of the Pristine Granules did not interfere with the malodor control of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. This suggests that they are compatible with each other in a laundry wash bath environment and in subsequent dried fabrics. EXAMPLE 12 Malodor control on Wound Dressings by Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract The ability of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract to control malodor production on several types of wound dressings was investigated. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. Wound dressings purchased from a local pharmacy include alginate, collagen, gauze, and polyurethane foam-based dressings. Wound dressings were cut into 0.4 g samples and inoculated with either 0.4mL of cell pellet extract or water (control) before being dosed with milk. The dosed wound dressings were capped and then placed in a 33°C incubator for 48 hours before being evaluated by a sensory method (See Milk Test Example 4). The odor character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged in the tables below. Table 24. Wound dressing materials and their ability to control malodor generation in the presence of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract. Results are based on 48-hour sensory evaluation. Wound Odor Control Agent Average Average Test t Cell pellet extract + Milk 2 1 PASS Cell pellet extract + Water 2 0 PASS a e emonsraes e a y o e rev ac us aerosporus fermentate extract to control malodor formation on various types of wound dressings inoculated with milk or water (PASS), compared to controls where wound dressing samples were only inoculated with water and milk (FAIL). EXAMPLE 13 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract for the malodor control of child and adult incontinence products and feminine products The ability of the Brevibacillus laterosporusA8.11 fermentate extract to control malodor production on incontinence and feminine hygiene products, such as a diaper (incontinence product) and a period pad (feminine hygiene product) was investigated. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. Samples were cut into 0.4 g pieces and inoculated with either 0.4 mL of cell pellet extract or water (control) before being dosed with milk. The dosed wound dressings were capped and then placed in a 33 ºC incubator for 48 hours before being evaluated by a sensory method (See milk test Example 4). The odor character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5 with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Samples were tested in either duplicate or triplicate and the values averaged (Table 25). Table 25. Incontinence and feminine hygiene materials and their ability to control malodor generation in the presence of cell pellet extract. Results are based on 48-hour sensory evaluation. Wound Odor Odor Test Dressing Odor Control Agent Table 25 demonstrates the ability of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract to control malodor formation on incontinence products and feminine hygiene products. EXAMPLE 14 Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts for hard surface cleaning The ability of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts to clean hard surfaces, such as bathroom and kitchen surfaces, was investigated. Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A8.11 was grown in nutrient rich TSB media and M9 minimal media, as described in Example 2, to obtain a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate. Cell free supernatants of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate were prepared as described in Example 3, by pelleting the cells (centrifuge at 4,000 to 8,000 x g) and passing the supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter. Samples were further pH adjusted to 9.5 and 2.5. Furthermore, whole broth fermentate extracts were prepared from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, as described in Example 3, by adjusting the pH to between 2.5 – 4.0 prior to pelleting out the insoluble cellular matter and filtering the supernatant through a 0.2 µM filter. Samples were further pH adjusted to 9.5 and 2.5. Black ceramic tiles coated with low pH soap scum were washed with control and test solutions to evaluate the cleaning ability of the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts. Black-colored tiles were used to more easily visualize the white-colored soap scum representative of a dirty hard surface like those commonly found in the shower or tub. Soap scum (comprised of 96.11% IPA, 2.88% soap scum, 0.05% silica and 0.96% sebum) was applied to tiles using an artist’s airbrush until a light film and gray cast appear on the tile. Tiles were dried overnight at 50°C (or for two hours at 70°C), then cooled to room temp before use. Next, under a fume hood, a wash solution was sprayed uniformly onto one tile until fully covered. The tile was then placed on a BYK Garden-scrub instrument and subject to 2 passes at 37 cycles / minute with pre- wet sponge under a 450g substrate carriage, rinsed with deionized water, placed in an oven at 70°C until dry, then left on benchtop overnight. The next day a high accuracy gloss meter was used to take angle measurements at 60° (gloss units, GU) from three locations on each tile. The value range for 60° measurements is 0-1000GU, with higher values indicating more gloss, and therefore a cleaner surface. Gloss measurements were taken on both untreated (fully clean control) and treated / unwashed (fully dirty control) black ceramic tiles to demonstrate the maximum and minimum gloss units in this experiment.

[0002] Table 26. Average gloss units (GU) of black ceramic tiles either untreated or treated with soap scum, and either unwashed or washed with control solutions. Samples Average 60° GU Untreated, unwashed tile (full clean control) 96.2 m (treated) washed with either control solutions, or the cell free supernatant or whole broth extract grown in TSB media at two pH levels. Samples Average 60° GU T d il h d ih H 96 5293

[0003] Table 28. Average gloss units (GU) of black ceramic tiles coated in soap scum (treated) washed with either control solutions, or the cell free supernatant or whole broth extract grown in minimal M9 media at two pH levels. Samples Average 60° GU Minimal Media Control (pH 9.5) 72.97 the whole broth extract in TSB (pH 2.5) show improved gloss units, and therefore improved cleaning of soap scum, on black ceramic tiles compared to water, media and commercial bathroom cleaner controls. In addition, Table 28 shows that cell free supernatant prepared in an M9 minimal media (pH 2.5) also shows improved gloss units over controls. This suggests that various Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts can be utilized for low pH hard surface cleaning purposes. White ceramic tiles coated with high pH kitchen grease were washed with control and test solutions to evaluate cleaning ability of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extracts. Cell free supernatants of Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate were prepared as described above. Dilutions of the cell free supernatants were prepared in tap water to compare cleaning ability at 100%, 10% and 1% concentration at pH 9.5. White ceramic tiles were used to more easily visualize the black-colored kitchen grease commonly found on hard surfaces in a kitchen. Kitchen grease (comprised of 33% vegetable shortening, 33% lard, 33% vegetable oil and 1% carbon lampblack) was applied to tiles using an artist’s airbrush until a light film and gray cast appear on the tile. Tiles were dried overnight at 50°C (or for two hours at 70°C), then cooled to room temp before use. Next, under a fume hood, a wash solution was sprayed uniformly onto one tile until fully covered. The tile was then placed on a BYK Garden-scrub instrument and subject to 2 passes at 37 cycles / minute with pre- wet sponge under a 450g substrate carriage, rinsed with deionized water, placed in an oven at 70°C until dry, then left on benchtop overnight. The next day a high accuracy gloss meter was used to take angle measurements at 60° (gloss units, GU) from three locations on each tile. The value range for 60° measurements is 0-1000GU, with higher values indicating more gloss, and therefore a cleaner surface. Gloss measurements were taken on both untreated (fully clean control) and treated / unwashed (fully dirty control) white ceramic tiles to demonstrate the maximum and minimum gloss units (Table 29). Table 29. Average gloss units (GU) of white ceramic tiles untreated or treated with kitchen grease, and unwashed, washed with control solutions, or washed with dilutions of cell free supernatant. Samples Average 60° GU U t t d h d til f ll l t l 934 Table 29 demonstrates that 10% cell free supernatant (pH 9.5) showed improved 60° gloss readings over control solutions and suggests that the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract can be utilized for high pH hard surface cleaning purposes. EXAMPLE 15 Brevibacillus laterosporus AL321 and Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 fermentate extracts function as a malodor control component providing fabric malodor control imparted through a wash bath in the absence of a detergent A Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 (CBS149788 - a Brevibacillus strain derived from Brevibacillus laterosporus strain G2 having the sporulation gene spolIIE removed as well as vancomycin and cytolysin genes removed as described in Example 1) fermentate was produced as described in Example 2, and a cell pellet fermentate extract was obtained as described in Example 3. A dilution series of a Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 pellet extract (fermentate extract) was established by mixing the extract with water. The malodor test was performed as previously described (Example 4) using 2.5 g of cotton and 2.5 g of polyester fabric in a 250 mL wash bath. Dilutions between 1:50, 1:100, 1;500 and 1:1000 (representing a wash bath composition having 2%, 1%, 0.2% and 0.1% by volume fermentate extract respectively, were tested. Samples were subsequentially subjected to the milk test previously described in Example 4 and odor character and intensity were evaluated. Results are shown in Table 30. Table 30. Sensory evaluation of milk test for cotton and polyester fabrics washed with Brevibacillus ALS321 pellet extracts at different dilutions. Sample washed with Average Odor Average Summary of Sample washed with Average Odor Average Summary of clean Polyester Character Odor Milk Test laterosporus ALS321 was tested for its ability to reduce malodor on cotton and polyester fabric. Therefore, the malodor test was performed as described in Example 4 using 2.5 g of cotton and 2.5 g of polyester fabric in a 250 mL wash bath. A dilution of 1:100 in water (representing a wash bath composition having 1% by volume fermentate extract) was tested. Samples were subsequentially subjected to the milk test (Example 4) and odor character and intensity were evaluated. Results are shown in Table 31. Table 31. Sensory evaluation of milk test for cotton and polyester fabrics washed with Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 and Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 pellet extracts. Sample washed with clean Average Average Summary of l f l Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 1.67 0.00 Pass Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 fermentate extracts can function as a malodor control component providing malodor control through the wash bath with no detergent. EXAMPLE 16 Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11, ALS321 and G2 fermentate extracts show sebum removal (cleaning) from soiled textile swatches The purpose of these experiments was to compare the ability of the fermentate extracts from two knockout strains, Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 and Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 and their parent strain Brevibacillus laterosporus G2 (described in Example 1), for their ability to clean sebum from a textile swatch. Cell free supernatant (fermentate extracts) from the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentates were obtained as described in the Example 3. Washing studies were performed in a Launder-Ometer® using 500 mL individual canisters containing 5 g fabric per 250-mL of solution. Three sebum- coated polyester and three sebum-coated cotton swatches (CFT C-S-94 & CFT P-S-94) were placed into the canister together with 15 stainless steel beads. Ballast fabric was added to a final weight of 5 g. The fabric was washed at 25°C for 45 minutes using a Launder-Ometer® (SDL Atlas M228AA). Fabric swatches were then rinsed 3x with deionized water and left on the benchtop to dry overnight. Colorimetric readings of L* a* b* values were taken in triplicate using a MACH 5. These values are used to calculate the Stain Removal Index (SRI) as described in Example 6. Results are shown in Tables 31 and 32.

[0004] Table 31. Stain Removal Index for Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11 and ALS321 fermentate extracts. SRI Value Sample Polyester Cotton extract SRI Value l P l Tables 31 and 32 show that all three Brevibacillus laterosporus A8.11, ALS321 and G2 show similar sebum cleaning abilities for both cotton and polyester swatches. EXAMPLE 17 Multiple washes with a low dosage of fermentate extract in the presence of a detergent provides malodor control on cotton fabric The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate whether multiple washes (5) with a low dose of a fermentate extract (cell pellet extract) in the presence of a detergent would continue to provide malodor control. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. Three different detergent compositions, detergent composition B, C and D comprising 10%, 5% and 1% (v / v) of cell pellet extract respectively were evaluated for their ability to provide malodor control in a wash bath (Table 33). The remaining two compositions were a negative water control and detergent only control (Detergent A) (Table 33). In order to mimic a wash bath comprising a detergent composition for washing cotton fabric, the detergent compositions wash bath solutions were assembled in a 250-mL wash bath comprising the detergent compositions at a final concentration shown in Table 33 to simulate home laundering standards. Table 33. Wash bath compositions comprising detergent compositions or water control. Tide Free Fermentate Deter ent Com osition Gentle extract n The wash bath compositions were contacted with 5g of cotton fabric in a Launder-Ometer (SDL Atlas M228AA) with 15 ball bearings and washing cycle set to 1 cycle at 25°C for 45 minutes. After each washing cycle, fabric samples were rinsed 3 times with water and directly placed into a new wash bath (having the same composition) to repeat the above process four additional times. After the fifth and final wash, the fabric sample was rinsed with water and allowed to dry overnight. When the fabric was dry, it was cut into 0.5 g pieces and subjected to a milk test (International Antimicrobial Council Biofouling of Textiles from Pasteurized Cows’ Milk Technical Note). The 0.5 g piece of fabric was placed into a glass vial (plastic interferes with the sensory reading) and “inoculated” with 0.5 mL of skim milk (not organic) or 0.5 mL of prepared Nestle Carnation non-fat milk powder (prepared 20% w / w). The fabric samples were incubated for 48 hours at 37 ºC before being sniffed by a researcher. The odor of the sample was judged based on character and intensity. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5, with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Table 34 – Milk odor test ratings of cotton fabrics exposed to different detergent solutions through multiple wash baths. Detergent composition Odor Odor CharacterIntensityResult Table 35 demonstrates that low doses of fermentate extract (0.00230% extract per volume wash bath and 0.0115 % extract per volume wash bath,) applied to cotton fabric across five Launder-Ometer washes can provide malodor control benefits when used in sequential multiple washes. Using low dose concentration of fermentate extracts over multiple washing cycles can be a lower cost alternative solution for malodor control on laundry versus a single wash at a higher fermentate extract concentration as shown in Examples 15 and 18. EXAMPLE 18 Stability of Fermentate Extracts at different Temperatures To evaluate the stability of a cell pellet extract (fermentate extracts) obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a 4-week stability study was conducted where samples were stored at either 50°C or 4°C and tested weekly for their ability to provide malodor control through the Launder-Ometer and subsequent milk test. A cell pellet extract from the Brevibacillus laterosporus ALS321 fermentate was obtained as described in Example 3. To evaluate different storage concentrations and temperatures, four sample sets were prepared in 15-mL falcon tubes with either 3-mL of 100% cell pellet extract by volume or 30-mL of a 10% dilution of the cell pellet extract by volume. Dilutions were done in water. Two sample sets (referred to as 100% pellet extract and 10% pellet extract) were stored at 50°C and two samples (referred to as 100% pellet extract and 10% pellet extract) were stored at 4°C. To assemble the wash bath, a 1:100 dilution of each sample (representing a wash bath composition 1% fermentate extract by volume for the 100% pellet extract sample and 0.1% fermentate extract by volume for the 10% pellet extract sample) was added to 250-mL of tap water containing 15 stainless steel ball bearings and 5g of cotton fabric. The pellet extract was contacted with the fabric in a Launder-Ometer (SDL Atlas M228AA) washing cycle set to 1 cycle at 25°C for 45 minutes. After washing, fabric samples were rinsed 3 times with water and allowed to dry overnight on the bench top. When they were dry, the fabric sample was cut into 0.5g pieces and subjected to a milk test (International Antimicrobial Council Biofouling of Textiles from Pasteurized Cows’ Milk Technical Note). The 0.5g piece of fabric was placed into a glass vial (plastic interferes with the sensory reading) and “inoculated” with 0.5 mL of skim milk (not organic) or 0.5 mL of prepared Nestle Carnation non-fat milk powder (prepared 20% w / w). The fabric samples were incubated for 48 hours at 37 ºC before being sniffed by a researcher. The odor of the sample was judged based on character and intensity. The character was rated on a scale of 1-3 with 1 being a pleasant odor, 2 being neither pleasant nor unpleasant, and 3 being unpleasant. The intensity scale was rated from 0 to 5, with 0 being no detectable odor and 5 being a very strong odor. A passing score was assigned to samples with a character score of 1 or 2 and an intensity score of 0-2.3. All other scores were considered failing (e.g. failing to provide malodor control). Results are shown in Tables 35-38. Table 35. Milk Odor Test ratings showing stability of pellet extract stored at 50°C at 4-weeks. Water100% pellet extract(stored at 50°C)t 50°C at 4-weeks. Water10% pellet extract(stored at 50°C) abe 3 . Odor est ratngs s owng stab ty o pe et extract stored at C at 4-weeks. Water100% pellet extract4° Table 38. Milk Odor Test ratings showing stability of pellet extract stored at 4°C at 4-weeks. Water10% pellet extract Tables 35-38 demonstrate that Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract provides malodor control when stored at two concentrations and at both 50°C and 4°C over a 4-week period.

Claims

THAT WHAT IS CLAIMED:

1. A cleaning composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes sebum or soil on a fabric or surface.

2. The cleaning composition of claim 1, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof.

3. A malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on a fabric or surface.

4. The malodor control composition of claim 3, wherein the Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract is selected from the group consisting of a cell pellet extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a cell free supernatant obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, a whole broth fermentate extract obtained from a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate, and any one combination thereof.

5. The cleaning composition of claim 1 or malodor composition of claim 3, wherein the composition is selected from the group consisting of a detergent composition, an additive, a wash liquor, a laundry machine cleaning composition, a textile cleaning composition, a hard surface cleaning composition, and a dishwasher cleaning composition.

6. A composition comprising the cleaning composition of claim 1 and the malodor control composition of claim 3.

7. The composition of claim 5, wherein the detergent composition is a laundry detergent composition or a dishware detergent composition.

8. The composition of claim 5, wherein the additive is a laundry additive or dishwasher additive.

9. The composition of claim 1 or claim 3 or claim 7, wherein the fermentate extract or composition comprising the fermentate extract is formulated in at least one form selected from the group consisting of a loose or compact powder, a granule, a liquid suspension or solution, a spray solution, or any combination thereof.

10. The composition any one of claims 1-9, further comprising an agent selected from the group consisting of one or more cleaning enzymes, a rheology modifier, a softener, a surfactant, an anti-redeposition agent, an optical brightener, a chelating agent, a laundry builder, a dye, a fragrance, and any one combination thereof.

11. A method for cleaning a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, on said fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or surface.

12. A method of facilitating stain removal from a fabric or textile comprising: a) applying to the fabric or textile directly an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract; and, b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the fabric is treated with said fermentate extract after the fabric has been stained.

14. The method according to claim 12 wherein the laundry process comprises washing the fabric with a laundry detergent.

15. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or a surface comprising: a) applying an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, on said fabric or surface, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said fabric or surface; and, b) rinsing said composition off of said fabric or dishware.

16. A method of malodor removal from a fabric comprising: a) treating the fabric directly with an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, or a composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract ; and, b) subsequently subjecting the fabric to a laundry process.

17. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from a fabric or textile in a wash liquor comprising: a) providing a first washing cycle by contacting the fabric or surface with a wash liquor wherein the wash liquor comprises a low dose of on effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, and optionally rinsing the fabric or textile; and, b) repeating the washing cycle of (a) multiple times until a prevention, reduction or removal of the malodor on said fabric or surface is observed.

18. A method of cleaning a hard surface or an object, comprising: (a) applying the hard surface cleaning composition of claim 5 onto said hard-surface or said object; (b) leaving said composition on said hard-surface or said object to act; optionally, wiping said hard-surface or object; and, (c) optionally rinsing said hard-surface or said object.

19. A method of cleaning a dishware comprising: (a) applying a dishware detergent composition according to claim 7 on said dishware; and, (b) rinsing said composition off of said dishware.

20. An animal litter or animal waste malodor control composition comprising an effective amount of a Brevibacillus laterosporus fermentate extract, wherein said extract prevents, reduces and / or removes a malodor on said litter or waste.

21. An odor control animal litter comprising particles of an absorbent or an absorbent litter substance said particles being contacted with a composition comprising an effective amount of the animal litter malodor control composition of claim 20.

22. A method of preventing, reducing or removing a malodor from an animal litter or animal waste, the method comprising applying directly to said litter an animal litter malodor control composition of claim 20.

Images