Personnel evaluation system

Abstract

To solve the issue of an existing personnel evaluation system that an existing personnel evaluation is not based on objective facts and there remains a sense of unfairness in a person who was evaluated.SOLUTION: The personnel evaluation system includes: storage means for storing the correspondence relation between evaluation item data, which are objective evaluations regarding evaluation items, and evaluation point data; input means for inputting evaluation selection data selected from the evaluation item data for each evaluation item; evaluation calculation means for calculating an evaluation value on the basis of the evaluation selection data and the predetermined correspondence; and personnel evaluation calculation means for calculating a personnel evaluation value.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a personnel evaluation system for employees belonging to a company, and more particularly to an objective personnel evaluation system that eliminates the subjectivity of the evaluator. [Background technology]

[0002] Various personnel evaluation systems have been proposed in the past. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a personnel evaluation system in which a user terminal and a server are connected via a network, the server having a calculation means for calculating a predetermined evaluation content using at least the numerical value for each item related to personnel evaluation inputted at the user terminal and the evaluation standard value for each item related to personnel evaluation inputted at the user terminal, and the personnel evaluation system can easily and simply clarify the characteristics and evaluation of individuals. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Patent Publication No. 2022-25220 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] However, the personnel evaluation system in Patent Document 1 is based on an eight-level subjective evaluation of items such as communication, teamwork, and challenging spirit, and does not perform evaluation based on objective facts. Therefore, even if an evaluation standard value tailored to the organization is introduced, there is a problem that the sense of unfairness of the person being evaluated cannot be eliminated.

[0005] In view of the above-mentioned circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a personnel evaluation system that performs evaluation based only on objective facts. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] The inventors of the present invention have conducted intensive research into the above-mentioned problems and have come up with the following revolutionary personnel evaluation system.

[0007] A first aspect of the present invention for solving the above problem is a personnel evaluation system for performing personnel evaluation of employees belonging to a company, comprising: a first correspondence relationship relating basic evaluation item data which is an objective evaluation of basic evaluation items which are evaluation items related to the employee's basic attributes and which is preset, and basic evaluation point data which is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation item data and which is preset; a second correspondence relationship relating self-evaluation item data which is an objective evaluation of self-evaluation items which are evaluation items performed by the employee himself / herself regarding the employee's behavioral performance and which is preset, and self-evaluation point data which is an evaluation value corresponding to the self-evaluation item data and which is preset; a third correspondence relationship relating skill evaluation item data which is an objective evaluation of skill evaluation items which are evaluation items related to the employee's skills and which is preset, and skill evaluation point data which is an evaluation value corresponding to the skill evaluation item data and which is preset; and a fourth correspondence relationship correlating the activity evaluation items with the basic evaluation selection data; an input means for inputting basic evaluation selection data selected from the basic evaluation item data for each of the basic evaluation items, self-evaluation selection data selected from the self-evaluation item data for each of the self-evaluation items, skill evaluation selection data selected from the skill evaluation item data for each of the skill evaluation items, and activity evaluation selection data selected from the activity evaluation item data for each of the activity evaluation items; a basic evaluation calculation means for calculating a basic evaluation value that is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation selection data based on the basic evaluation selection data input by the input means and the first correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; a self-evaluation calculation means for calculating a self-evaluation value that is an evaluation value corresponding to the self-evaluation selection data based on the self-evaluation selection data input by the input means and the second correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; a skill evaluation calculation means for calculating a skill evaluation value that is an evaluation value corresponding to the skill evaluation selection data based on the skill evaluation selection data input by the input means and the third correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; andThe personnel evaluation system includes an activity evaluation calculation means for calculating an activity evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the activity evaluation selection data, based on the fourth correspondence relationship read from the storage means, and a personnel evaluation calculation means for calculating a personnel evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the personnel evaluation, based on the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, and the activity evaluation value.

[0008] According to the first aspect, the personnel evaluation value is calculated based on an objective evaluation, which eliminates the sense of unfairness in personnel evaluation, thereby improving the satisfaction of employees with the evaluation results and increasing their motivation.

[0009] A second aspect of the present invention is a personnel evaluation system according to the first aspect, characterized in that the storage means further stores a fifth correspondence relationship relating predetermined attendance evaluation item data which is an objective evaluation of attendance evaluation items which are evaluation items related to an employee's attendance, and predetermined attendance evaluation point data which is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation item data, the input means further inputs attendance evaluation selection data selected from the attendance evaluation item data for each of the attendance evaluation items, and the input means further has attendance evaluation calculation means for calculating an attendance evaluation value which is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation selection data based on the attendance evaluation selection data input by the input means and the fifth correspondence relationship read out from the storage means, and the personnel evaluation calculation means calculates the personnel evaluation value based on the basic evaluation value, self-evaluation value, skill evaluation value, activity evaluation value and attendance evaluation value.

[0010] According to the second aspect, since the attendance evaluation value is calculated based on an objective evaluation, the personnel evaluation value is also calculated based on an objective evaluation, which can eliminate the sense of unfairness in the personnel evaluation, thereby improving the satisfaction of employees with the evaluation results and increasing their motivation.

[0011] A third aspect of the present invention resides in a personnel evaluation system according to the first or second aspect, further comprising a skill improvement suggestion means for presenting skill evaluation item data that an employee should or would be better off acquiring based on the employee's skill evaluation selection data.

[0012] According to the third aspect, since skill evaluation item data that should be acquired or would be better to acquire is presented, it has the effect of increasing the motivation of employees and improving their technical capabilities.

[0013] A fourth aspect of the present invention resides in a personnel evaluation system as described in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the storage means further stores all-employee past work data summarizing, for each employee, the work that each employee has been involved in in the past, and further includes past work skill improvement suggestion means for presenting skill evaluation item data that an employee should or would be better off acquiring based on the past work data of the employee's past work input by the input means and the all-employee past work data.

[0014] According to the fourth aspect, the skills that an employee should or should acquire are presented based on past work data relating to the work the employee has been involved in in the past, which has the effect of increasing the employee's motivation and improving the employee's technical capabilities.

[0015] A fifth aspect of the present invention is a personnel evaluation system according to any one of the first to fourth aspects, further comprising a next year's salary calculation means for calculating an employee's planned salary for the next year based on the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees, the employee's personnel evaluation values, and the total planned salary amount for the next year to be paid as the salary of all employees in the next year.

[0016] According to the fifth aspect, the salary for the next year is decided based on the personnel evaluation value based on an objective evaluation. This eliminates the sense of unfairness in the salary amount, thereby improving the satisfaction of employees with respect to the salary amount and increasing their motivation. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0017] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to the first embodiment. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the personnel evaluation system according to the first embodiment. [Diagram 3] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating basic evaluation items, basic evaluation item data, and basic evaluation point data. [Figure 4] FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating self-assessment items, self-assessment item data, and self-assessment point data. [Diagram 5] FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating skill evaluation items, skill evaluation item data, and skill evaluation point data. [Figure 6] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating activity evaluation items, activity evaluation item data, and activity evaluation point data. [Figure 7] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to the first embodiment. [Figure 8] FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to the second embodiment. [Figure 9] FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating examples of attendance evaluation items, attendance evaluation item data, and attendance evaluation point data. [Figure 10] FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to the third embodiment. [Figure 11] FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a method for determining skill evaluation item data to be acquired according to the third embodiment. [Figure 12] FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to the third embodiment. [Figure 13] FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. [Figure 14] FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of the personnel evaluation value of each employee according to the fourth embodiment. [Figure 15] FIG. 15 is a diagram for explaining a method for calculating the next year's salary in the personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. [Figure 16]FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0018] DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of a personnel evaluation system according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to the following embodiment. (Embodiment 1)

[0019] Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to embodiment 1. As shown in Fig. 1, the personnel evaluation system 1 according to embodiment 1 is composed of a server 2 and terminals 3A and 3B (terminals 3) connected thereto via a network 4. Based on information input from terminal 3 via the network 4, the server 2 performs calculations of personnel evaluation values ​​and the like.

[0020] Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the personnel evaluation system according to embodiment 1. The left side of Fig. 2 is the server 2 side, and the right side is the terminal 3 side. The server 2 side is composed of a server side communication I / F 21, a server side storage means 22, and a server side processor 25, each of which is connected by a server side bus 26. The server side processor 25 functions as an input / output control means 251, a basic evaluation calculation means 252, a self-evaluation calculation means 253, a skill evaluation calculation means 254, an activity evaluation calculation means 255, and a personnel evaluation calculation means 257.

[0021] The terminal 3 comprises a terminal side communication I / F 31, a terminal side storage means 32, a terminal side input means 33, a terminal side output means 34, and a terminal side processor 35, all of which are connected by a terminal side bus 36. The terminal side processor 35 also functions as an input control means 351 and an output control means 352.

[0022] The network 4 is not particularly limited, including wired and wireless, as long as it can connect the server 2 and the terminal 3, and examples of the network include the Internet line and an intranet. The terminal 3 is not particularly limited, as long as it can communicate with the server 2 via the network 4, and examples of the terminal 3 include a personal computer, a smartphone, a tablet terminal, and the like.

[0023] In the personnel evaluation system of the first embodiment, the personnel evaluation of employees belonging to a company is divided into four categories: basic evaluation, self-evaluation, skill evaluation, and activity evaluation. One or more evaluation items are set in advance for each category. Basic evaluation items are evaluation items related to the basic attributes of an employee, and self-evaluation items are evaluation items conducted by the employee himself / herself regarding the performance of the employee's actions. Skill evaluation items are evaluation items related to the skills of the employee, and activity evaluation items are evaluation items related to the performance of the employee's activities for the company.

[0024] 3 to 6 are diagrams illustrating the evaluation items, evaluation item data, and evaluation point data for each category. The evaluation item data is an objective evaluation of the evaluation items, and is set in advance for each company. In other words, all evaluation item data is an objective evaluation. Here, objective evaluation means an evaluation based on objective facts. Moreover, the evaluation point data is an evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item data, and is set in advance.

[0025] 3 is a diagram illustrating basic evaluation items, basic evaluation item data, and basic evaluation point data. Note that there is only one basic evaluation item, "years of service," but there is no limit to the number of items.

[0026] The preset basic evaluation item data for the basic evaluation item "years of service" are "1", "2", ..., and "45". The basic evaluation item data for "years of service" is an evaluation based on objective facts and is an objective evaluation. Furthermore, the preset basic evaluation point data, which are the evaluation values ​​corresponding to "1", "2", ..., and "45", are "16", "17", ..., and "60".

[0027] In addition, a first correspondence relationship that relates the basic evaluation item data and the basic evaluation point data is stored as a database table or a calculation formula in the server-side storage means 22, which is a storage means. As the server-side storage means 22, for example, commercially available relational database software and the like can be mentioned.

[0028] 4 is a diagram illustrating examples of self-assessment items, self-assessment item data, and self-assessment point data. Note that there are three self-assessment items, but there is no limit to the number of items.

[0029] The preset self-evaluation item data for the self-evaluation item "Did you attend the financial results presentation?" is "absent" or "attended", which is an objective evaluation. The preset self-evaluation point data, which is the evaluation value corresponding to "absent" or "attended", is "0" or "3".

[0030] Further, a second correspondence that associates the self-assessment item data with the self-assessment point data is stored as a database table in the server-side storage means 22, which is a storage means.

[0031] The self-assessment item data for the self-assessment item "Have you joined a stockholding association?" is "No" and "Yes", which is an objective evaluation. The evaluation values ​​corresponding to "No" and "Yes", which are pre-set self-assessment point data, are "0" and "3". The self-assessment item data for the self-assessment item "Have you received a vaccination?" is "Did not receive a vaccination?" and "Received a vaccination", which is an objective evaluation. The evaluation values ​​corresponding to "Did not receive a vaccination?" and "Received a vaccination", which are pre-set self-assessment point data, are "0" and "3".

[0032] 5 is a diagram illustrating examples of skill evaluation items, skill evaluation item data, and skill evaluation point data. There are three skill evaluation items, but there is no limit to the number of items.

[0033] The preset skill evaluation item data for the skill evaluation item "Did the skill diagnosis exceed the standard score?" in FIG. 5(a) are "did not exceed" and "exceeded." Skill diagnosis is evaluated based on objective indicators. Therefore, the skill evaluation item "Did the skill diagnosis exceed the standard score?" is an objective evaluation. Examples of skill diagnosis include skills such as "network design," "network management," and "network security." The preset skill evaluation point data, which are the evaluation values ​​corresponding to "did not exceed" and "exceeded," are "0" and "10," respectively.

[0034] Similarly, the skill evaluation item "Level 0" in Fig. 5(b) is a collection of multiple skills such as "network design," "network management," and "network security." Therefore, the skill evaluation item "Level 0" is an objective evaluation. Moreover, the evaluation values ​​corresponding to "Level 0" and "Level 1," which are preset skill evaluation point data, are "5" and "10," respectively.

[0035] Moreover, a third correspondence that associates the skill evaluation item data with the self-assessment point data is stored as a database table in the server-side storage means 22, which is a storage means.

[0036] The preset skill evaluation item data for the skill evaluation item "Have you obtained a qualification?" is "No" and "Yes", which is an objective evaluation. The preset skill evaluation point data which is the evaluation value corresponding to "No" and "Yes" is "0" and "5". The skill evaluation item data for the skill evaluation item "Have you taken skills training?" is "No" and "Yes", which is an objective evaluation. The preset skill evaluation point data which is the evaluation value corresponding to "No" and "Yes" is "0" and "5".

[0037] 6 is a diagram showing examples of activity evaluation items, activity evaluation item data, and activity evaluation point data. There are three activity evaluation items, but there is no limit to the number of items.

[0038] The activity evaluation item data for the activity evaluation item "Did you receive additional personnel cooperation?" is "No" or "Yes", which is an objective evaluation. The activity evaluation point data, which is the evaluation value corresponding to "No" or "Yes" and is preset, is "0" or "5".

[0039] A fourth correspondence relationship that associates the activity evaluation item data with the activity evaluation point data is stored as a database table in the server-side storage means 22, which is a storage means.

[0040] Additionally, the activity evaluation item data for the activity evaluation item "Were there any customer introductions?" is "No" or "Yes," which is an objective evaluation. The activity evaluation point data, which is the evaluation values ​​corresponding to "No" or "Yes," and is set in advance, are "0" or "5." The activity evaluation item data for the activity evaluation item "Were there any sales cooperation site transfers?" is "No" or "Yes," which is an objective evaluation. The activity evaluation point data, which is the evaluation values ​​corresponding to "No" or "Yes," and is set in advance, are "0" or "5."

[0041] The data selected from the evaluation item data for each evaluation item is called the evaluation selection data. For example, if the basic evaluation item data for the basic evaluation item "years of service" is "1", "2", ... "45", then one piece of data selected from "1", "2", ... "45" is the evaluation selection data. Similarly, if the skills evaluation item data for the skills evaluation item "did you take skills training?" is "did not take" or "did take", then any piece of data selected from "did not take" or "did take" is the evaluation selection data. The evaluation item data is an objective evaluation, and the evaluation selection data selected from the evaluation item data is also an objective evaluation.

[0042] The evaluation selection data selected by an employee or the like from among the evaluation item data is input by the terminal side input means 33, which is an input means. For example, the employee performs an operation of selecting from the skill evaluation item data "did you attend a skill training course" displayed on the terminal side output means 34 such as a display, among "did not attend" and "attended" for the skill evaluation item data. The skill evaluation selection data is selected by the operation of selecting from among the skill evaluation item data on the terminal side input means 33, and the skill evaluation selection data is input to the personnel evaluation system 1. The evaluation selection data may be input using a screen displayed on the terminal side output means 34 by using an application program. For example, a method is possible in which an evaluation input screen is displayed on the terminal side output means 34, and selection and input are made using a pull-down list, a button list, or a send button. Also, a part of the evaluation selection data may be input by an authorized third party. The terminal side input means 33 may be, for example, a keyboard, a touch panel, or the like.

[0043] Also, an entrance / exit management system or a conference management system may be connected to the personnel evaluation system 1, and the server of the management system may function as the terminal 3, with evaluation selection data being input to the server-side storage means 22 at a predetermined timing and transmitted. For example, for input of evaluation selection data such as attendance at skill training, records from an entrance / exit management system or the like may be input to the personnel evaluation system 1 and transmitted. Also, a configuration is possible in which the personnel evaluation system 1 reads out basic evaluation selection data of employees recorded in a management server that manages basic attributes of employees, and transmits it to the personnel evaluation system 1.

[0044] Furthermore, if the selected evaluation data is not input by a preset deadline, the personnel evaluation system 1 may cause the terminal side output means 34 to display a message prompting the user to input the items that have not been input.

[0045] Next, each evaluation calculation means for calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation selection data will be described. First, the basic evaluation calculation means 252 for calculating a basic evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation selection data, will be described. The basic evaluation item data and the basic evaluation point data have a first correspondence relationship. Here, all the basic evaluation item data and the basic evaluation point data corresponding to each of the basic evaluation item data are expressed by the first correspondence relationship.

[0046] On the other hand, the basic evaluation selection data is selected from the basic evaluation item data, and the basic evaluation value is selected from the basic evaluation point data. Therefore, there is a first correspondence relationship between the basic evaluation selection data and the basic evaluation value, and the basic evaluation value is calculated based on the basic evaluation selection data and the first correspondence relationship.

[0047] Here, the basic evaluation selection data is input from the terminal-side input means 33, and the first correspondence relationship is read from the server-side storage means 22. As described above, the basic evaluation calculation means 252 calculates a basic evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation selection data, based on the basic evaluation selection data input from the terminal-side input means 33 and the first correspondence relationship read from the server-side storage means 22. An example of the basic evaluation calculation means 252 is a program having such a function.

[0048] Similarly, the self-evaluation calculation means 253 calculates a self-evaluation value, which is an evaluation value for the self-evaluation selection data, based on the self-evaluation selection data input from the terminal-side input means 33 and the second correspondence relationship read out from the server-side storage means 22. An example of the self-evaluation calculation means 253 is a program having such a function.

[0049] Moreover, the skill evaluation calculation means 254 calculates a skill evaluation value, which is an evaluation value for the skill evaluation selection data, based on the skill evaluation selection data input from the terminal-side input means 33 and the third correspondence relationship read from the server-side storage means 22. An example of the skill evaluation calculation means 254 is a program having such a function.

[0050] Moreover, the activity evaluation calculation means 255 calculates an activity evaluation value, which is an evaluation value for the activity evaluation selection data, based on the activity evaluation selection data input from the terminal-side input means 33 and the fourth correspondence relationship read out from the server-side storage means 22. An example of the activity evaluation calculation means 255 is a program having such a function.

[0051] Next, the personnel evaluation calculation means 257 for calculating the personnel evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the personnel evaluation, will be described. The basic evaluation calculation means 252 calculates the basic evaluation value, and the self-evaluation calculation means 253 calculates the self-evaluation value. Furthermore, the skill evaluation calculation means 254 calculates the skill evaluation value, and the activity evaluation calculation means 255 calculates the activity evaluation value. The four evaluation values, the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, and the activity evaluation value, are added together to calculate the personnel evaluation value. Note that this is not limited to addition, and processing such as predetermined weighting may also be performed. As described above, the personnel evaluation calculation means 257 calculates the personnel evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of the personnel evaluation, based on the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, and the activity evaluation value.

[0052] As described above, the evaluation selection data is an objective evaluation. Furthermore, the evaluation value is calculated from a predetermined correspondence relationship with the evaluation selection data. Therefore, the evaluation value is a value based on the objective evaluation. As a result, the personnel evaluation value is calculated only from values ​​based on the objective evaluation. In this way, the personnel evaluation value is calculated only based on the objective evaluation. Therefore, the sense of unfairness in personnel evaluation is eliminated, which can improve employee satisfaction with the evaluation results and has the effect of increasing employee motivation.

[0053] Fig. 7 is a diagram showing a processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to embodiment 1. Fig. 7 shows a processing flow in which evaluation selection data is selected and input by an employee operating a terminal, a personnel evaluation value is calculated, and the personnel evaluation value is stored in a storage means.

[0054] An employee requests the display of an input screen by operating the terminal-side input means 33 (S101). The server 2 receives the request sent by the output control means 352 (S102). The input / output control means 251 reads out input screen information prestored in the server-side storage means 22 (S103). The input / output control means 251 transmits the read-out input screen information to the terminal 3 (S104). The input control means 351 of the terminal 3 receives the input screen information (S105). The output control means 352 displays the received input screen information on the terminal-side output means 34 (S106).

[0055] The employee selects evaluation selection data from the displayed evaluation item data and inputs the evaluation selection data using the terminal side input means 33 (S107). In response to an operation by the employee, such as operating the send button, the output control means 352 transmits the evaluation selection data (S108). The input / output control means 251 receives the evaluation selection data (S109).

[0056] The input / output control means 251 reads out a database table of predetermined correspondences that associate evaluation item data with evaluation point data, which is prestored in the server-side storage means 22 (S110). The evaluation calculation means calculates an evaluation value that corresponds to the evaluation selection data, based on the evaluation selection data and the read out table (S111).

[0057] If the calculation of the evaluation values ​​for all items in all categories has been completed (Y in S112), the personnel evaluation calculation means 257 adds up the evaluation values ​​for all items in all categories to calculate a personnel evaluation value (performs personnel evaluation) (S113). The input / output control means 251 stores the calculated personnel evaluation value in the server-side storage means 22 (S114). If the calculation of the evaluation values ​​for all items in all categories has not been completed (N in S112), the input / output control means 251 transmits a request to the terminal 3 to display items that have not been input, and the input control means 351 of the terminal 3 displays the items that have not been input on the terminal-side output means 34 (S115). (Embodiment 2)

[0058] In the second embodiment, a category of attendance evaluation, which is an evaluation of an employee's attendance, is set in addition to the category of personnel evaluation in the first embodiment. Note that the basic configuration and the process flow for calculating the personnel evaluation value are common to the first embodiment, so a description of the common parts will be omitted.

[0059] 8 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to embodiment 2. In embodiment 2, there is provided an attendance evaluation calculation means 256 that calculates an evaluation value for attendance evaluation.

[0060] Fig. 9 is a diagram illustrating examples of attendance evaluation items, attendance evaluation item data, and attendance evaluation point data. The attendance evaluation item data is an objective evaluation of attendance evaluation, which is an evaluation item related to an employee's attendance, and is set in advance. Furthermore, the attendance evaluation point data is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation item data and is set in advance. There are three attendance evaluation items, but there is no limit to the number of items.

[0061] The preset attendance evaluation item data for the attendance evaluation item "How many times have you been absent without permission?" is "none," "once," "twice," ..., "ten times," which is an objective evaluation. Also, the preset attendance evaluation point data, which is the evaluation value corresponding to "none," "once," "twice," ..., "ten times," is "0," "-10," ..., "-100."

[0062] Here, a fifth correspondence relationship that associates the attendance evaluation item data with the attendance evaluation point data is stored as a database table in the server side storage means 22, which is a storage means.

[0063] In addition, the attendance evaluation item data for the attendance evaluation item "How many times did you leave early without permission?" is "none," "once," "twice," ..., and "ten times," all of which are objective evaluations. The attendance evaluation point data, which are preset evaluation values ​​corresponding to "none," "once," "twice," ..., and "10 times," are "0," "-5," ..., and "-50."

[0064] Similarly, the attendance evaluation item data for the attendance evaluation item "How many times have you been late without permission?" is "none," "once," "twice," ..., and "ten times," all of which are objective evaluations. The attendance evaluation point data, which are preset evaluation values ​​corresponding to "none," "once," "twice," ..., and "10 times," are "0," "-5," ..., and "-50."

[0065] The server-side storage means 22, which is a storage means, further stores a fifth correspondence relationship that relates attendance evaluation item data, which is pre-set data corresponding to objective evaluations of attendance evaluation items, which are evaluation items related to an employee's attendance, and attendance evaluation point data, which is pre-set evaluation values ​​corresponding to the attendance evaluation item data.

[0066] The terminal side input means 33, which is an input means, further inputs selected attendance evaluation data from the attendance evaluation item data for each of the attendance evaluation items.

[0067] The personnel evaluation system 1 further includes an attendance evaluation calculation means 256 that calculates an attendance evaluation value, which is an evaluation value for the attendance evaluation items. The attendance evaluation calculation means 256 calculates an attendance evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation selection data, based on the attendance evaluation selection data inputted by the terminal side input means 33, which is an input means, and the fifth correspondence relation read out from the server side storage means 22, which is a storage means. An example of the attendance evaluation calculation means 256 is a program having such a function.

[0068] The personnel evaluation calculation means 257 then calculates a personnel evaluation value based on the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, the activity evaluation value, and the attendance evaluation value.

[0069] As described above, the attendance evaluation item data is an objective evaluation. Since the attendance evaluation value is calculated based on the objective evaluation, the personnel evaluation value is also calculated based on the objective evaluation. Therefore, the sense of unfairness in the personnel evaluation is eliminated, which can improve the satisfaction of employees with the evaluation results and has the effect of increasing the motivation of employees. (Embodiment 3)

[0070] In the third embodiment, the personnel evaluation system compares an employee's skill evaluation value with the skill evaluation values ​​of employees who have similar skills to the employee, and presents to the employee skills that the employee should acquire in the next year, etc., or skills that would be better for the employee to acquire.

[0071] As an example, we will show a personnel evaluation system that divides employees with similar skills into groups, and if the skill evaluation value of an employee in the group is lower than the group average by a certain value or more, suggests skills that the employee should acquire in the following year.

[0072] Fig. 10 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to embodiment 3. A skill improvement suggestion means 258 is provided in addition to the block diagram of Fig. 8 of embodiment 2. Note that explanations of parts common to embodiments 1 and 2, such as the basic configuration and the processing flow for calculating personnel evaluation values, will be omitted.

[0073] First, employees with similar skills are grouped together. Grouping may be done by a human resources manager or other person other than the personnel evaluation system 1. Also, a management server that records departments and work histories may be connected to the personnel evaluation system 1, so that the personnel evaluation system 1 can automatically group employees.

[0074] Fig. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a method for determining the skill evaluation item data to be acquired. In Fig. 11, P indicates the skill evaluation selection data of employee 1 this year, and Q indicates the skill evaluation value corresponding to P. Furthermore, R indicates the average skill evaluation value of the group to which employee 1 belongs this year, S is the (RQ) value, and T indicates whether S is 5 or more. T indicates whether the skill evaluation value of employee 1 is lower than the average value of the group by 5 or more. Note that the threshold value "5" is not limited to this.

[0075] The skill improvement suggestion means 258 determines the skill evaluation item data that the employee 1 should acquire next year to be "done" corresponding to the skill evaluation item "did you take skill training" for which T is set to Yes. Then, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 suggests to the employee 1 to acquire the skill evaluation item data "done" for "did you take skill training" next year. In other words, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 suggests to the employee 1 to take skill training next year. For example, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 suggests to the employee 1 that "you should take skill training next year" on a screen or sheet that displays the personnel evaluation results of this year. Note that the method by which the skill improvement suggestion means 258 determines the skill evaluation item data to be acquired is not limited to the above method, and may be, for example, a method of determining the skill evaluation item data to be acquired using AI (artificial intelligence). For example, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 may be a program having such a function.

[0076] Furthermore, the skill evaluation item data to be acquired is determined based on the skill evaluation selection data of employee 1, with reference to S using the corresponding skill evaluation value Q. In this way, the skill improvement suggestion means presents (displays on the terminal-side output means) the skill evaluation item data that the employee should acquire, based on the skill evaluation selection data for the employee.

[0077] Furthermore, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 may present to the employee an estimated value of what the ranking of the personnel evaluation value will be within the group if the employee takes the skill training next year. For example, it may present such a value as "If you take the skill training next year, you can expect to move up two places in the ranking of the 12 people in the group." Furthermore, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 may present to the employee an estimated value of what the salary will be the year after next if the employee takes the skill training next year. For example, it may present such a value as "If you take the skill training next year, you can expect your annual salary the year after next to increase by about 730,000 yen."

[0078] In this way, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 presents the skill evaluation item data to be acquired, which has the effect of increasing the motivation of employees and improving their technical capabilities.

[0079] Fig. 12 is a diagram showing a processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to the third embodiment. First, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 reads out the skill evaluation values ​​of all the members of the group to which the employee 1 belongs, including the skill evaluation value P of the employee 1, from the server-side storage means 22 (S301). Next, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 calculates the average value R of the group's skill evaluation values ​​for each skill evaluation item (S302). Next, the skill improvement suggestion means 258 determines the skill evaluation item data to be acquired for skill evaluation items with an S value of 5 or more, and presents the skill evaluation item data to the employee 1 (S303). (Embodiment 4)

[0080] The personnel evaluation system of the fourth embodiment calculates the planned salary of the target employee for the next year using the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees, the personnel evaluation value of the target employee, and the total planned salary for the next year.

[0081] Fig. 13 is a block diagram of a personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. A next year salary calculation means 259 is added to the block diagram of Fig. 10 of the third embodiment. Note that a description of the parts common to the first to third embodiments will be omitted.

[0082] Fig. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of the personnel evaluation value of each employee. Note that Fig. 14 shows the calculation results for only some employees. The calculation results of the personnel evaluation values ​​for all employees are stored in the server-side storage means 22.

[0083] Fig. 15 is a diagram for explaining a method for calculating next year's salary in the personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. In Fig. 15, A is the personnel evaluation value of each employee, and B is the personnel evaluation value ratio, which is "the ratio of each employee's personnel evaluation value to the sum of the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees." Furthermore, C is the total planned salary for next year, which is the total amount of salary planned for next year, and D is the calculated salary of each employee for next year. C is set to 80 million yen as an example. Furthermore, D is calculated by adding up B and C.

[0084] The method of calculating D is not limited to this, and other methods may be used. For example, D may be calculated as follows. First, the total salary for this year (the total salary for this year paid as the salary of all employees in this year) is subtracted from the total planned salary for next year to calculate the total salary increase. Next, the ranking and deviation value of each employee compared to all other employees are calculated based on the personnel evaluation value of each employee. After that, the amount of the salary increase for each employee is determined according to the ranking and deviation value, and D is calculated by adding the amount of the salary increase to each employee's current salary.

[0085] In addition, although it has been explained that the calculation of the next year's planned salary is done once a year, the present invention is not limited to this.

[0086] In this way, the next year salary calculation means 259 calculates the next year's planned salary of the target employee based on the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees, the personnel evaluation value of the target employee, and the total next year's planned salary amount to be paid as the salary of all employees in the next year. An example of the next year's salary calculation means 259 is a program having such a function.

[0087] In the fourth embodiment, the salary for the next year is determined based on the personnel evaluation value based on an objective evaluation. This eliminates the sense of unfairness in the salary amount, thereby improving the satisfaction of employees with respect to the salary amount and increasing their motivation.

[0088] FIG. 16 is a diagram showing the processing flow of the personnel evaluation system according to the fourth embodiment. First, the next year's salary calculation means 259 reads out the personnel evaluation values ​​A and the next year's planned total salary C of all employees from the server-side storage means 22 (S501). Next, the next year's salary calculation means 259 calculates the sum of the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees (S502). Next, the next year's salary calculation means 259 calculates the personnel evaluation value ratio B, which is the ratio of the personnel evaluation value of the target employee to the sum of the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees (S503). Next, the next year's salary calculation means 259 multiplies B and C to calculate the target employee's salary D for the next year (S504). (Embodiment 5)

[0089] In the personnel evaluation system of embodiment 3, a skill improvement suggestion means is provided, and the personnel evaluation system compares an employee's skill evaluation value with the skill evaluation values ​​of employees who have similar skills to the employee, and presents to the employee the skills that the employee should acquire in the next year, etc., but the present invention is not limited to this.

[0090] For example, the storage means may further store all-employee past work data that compiles the work that each employee has been involved in in the past for each employee, and may be provided with a past work skill improvement suggestion means that presents skill evaluation item data that an employee should or would be better off acquiring based on the past work data of the employee's past work input by the input means and the all-employee past work data.

[0091] Here, the past work data is data inputted to an input means, and is not particularly limited as long as it is data related to work that the employee has been involved in in the past. Examples of past work data include data that includes information about work that the employee has been involved in in the past, such as work history. Moreover, the all-employee past work data is data that compiles the past work data of all employees.

[0092] The past work skill improvement suggestion means is for presenting skill evaluation item data that the employee should acquire or would be better to acquire based on the employee's past work data and the past work data of all employees. The past work skill improvement suggestion means has, for example, the following functions.

[0093] First, multiple employees (similar employees) with a high similarity to the past work data of employee A are extracted from the past work data of all employees. Here, the similarity is not particularly limited as long as it is calculated according to a predetermined standard. For example, instead of inputting training data, all past work data of all employees may be input and the similarity may be calculated by a trained AI (such as an artificial intelligence created using fastText, etc.). Specifically, a document vector is obtained for each employee's past work data. Note that a document vector is a document that combines words and is quantified using a distributed representation in which words are expressed numerically. Then, a cosine similarity to the past work data of employee A is calculated from the document vector.

[0094] Then, based on the obtained similarity (cosine similarity, etc.), for example, the top three employees with high similarity can be extracted.

[0095] Next, the skill evaluation item data held by employee A is compared with the skill evaluation item data held by similar employees, and skill evaluation item data X held by the similar employees but not held by employee A is extracted. Then, the skill evaluation item data X is presented.

[0096] An example of the past business skill improvement suggestion means is a program having such a function.

[0097] By configuring the personnel evaluation system to include a means for suggesting improvements to past work skills in this way, skills that should be acquired or would be good to acquire are presented, which has the effect of increasing employee motivation and improving the technical capabilities of employees. [Explanation of symbols]

[0098] 1. Personnel evaluation system 2 Server 3, 3A, 3B terminal 4. Network 21 Server side communication I / F 22 Server side storage means 25 Server Side Processor 26 Server Side Bus 31 Terminal communication I / F 32 Terminal side storage means 33 Terminal side input means 34 Terminal side output means 35 Terminal side processor 36 Terminal side bus 251 Input / Output Control Means 252 Basic assessment calculation method 253 Self-assessment calculation method 254 Skill Evaluation Calculation Method 255 Activity evaluation calculation method 256 Attendance evaluation calculation method 257 Personnel Evaluation Calculation Method 258 Skill Improvement Suggestions 259 Next year salary calculation method

Claims

1. A personnel evaluation system for evaluating the personnel of employees belonging to a company, a storage means for storing a first correspondence relation that relates basic evaluation item data, which is an objective evaluation of basic evaluation items that are evaluation items related to the basic attributes of the employee, to basic evaluation point data, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation item data, which is a preset basic evaluation point data; a second correspondence relation that relates self-evaluation item data, which is an objective evaluation of self-evaluation items that are evaluation items performed by the employee himself / herself regarding the employee's behavioral performance, to self-evaluation point data, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the self-evaluation item data, which is a preset self-evaluation point data; a third correspondence relation that relates skill evaluation item data, which is an objective evaluation of skill evaluation items that are evaluation items related to the employee's skills, to skill evaluation point data, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the skill evaluation item data, which is a preset skill evaluation point data; and a fourth correspondence relation that relates activity evaluation item data, which is an objective evaluation of activity evaluation items that are evaluation items related to the employee's activity performance for the company, to activity evaluation point data, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the activity evaluation item data, which is a preset activity evaluation point data. an input means for inputting basic evaluation selection data selected from the basic evaluation item data for each of the basic evaluation items, self-evaluation selection data selected from the self-evaluation item data for each of the self-evaluation items, skill evaluation selection data selected from the skill evaluation item data for each of the skill evaluation items, and activity evaluation selection data selected from the activity evaluation item data for each of the activity evaluation items; and a basic evaluation calculation means for calculating a basic evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the basic evaluation selection data, based on the basic evaluation selection data input by the input means and the first correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; a self-evaluation calculation means for calculating a self-evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the self-evaluation selection data, based on the self-evaluation selection data input by the input means and the second correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; a skill evaluation calculation means for calculating a skill evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the skill evaluation selection data, based on the skill evaluation selection data input by the input means and the third correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; an activity evaluation calculation means for calculating an activity evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the activity evaluation selection data, based on the activity evaluation selection data input by the input means and the fourth correspondence relationship read out from the storage means; a personnel evaluation calculation means for calculating a personnel evaluation value, which is an evaluation value of a personnel evaluation, based on the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, and the activity evaluation value; A personnel evaluation system comprising:

2. The storage means further stores a fifth correspondence relationship that associates predetermined attendance evaluation item data, which is an objective evaluation of attendance evaluation items that are evaluation items related to the employee's attendance, with predetermined attendance evaluation point data, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation item data; The input means further inputs attendance evaluation selection data selected from the attendance evaluation item data for each of the attendance evaluation items, The system further includes an attendance evaluation calculation means for calculating an attendance evaluation value, which is an evaluation value corresponding to the attendance evaluation selection data, based on the attendance evaluation selection data input by the input means and the fifth correspondence relationship read out from the storage means, The personnel evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the personnel evaluation calculation means calculates the personnel evaluation value based on the basic evaluation value, the self-evaluation value, the skill evaluation value, the activity evaluation value, and the attendance evaluation value.

3. 3. The personnel evaluation system according to claim 1, further comprising a skill improvement suggestion means for presenting the skill evaluation item data that the employee should or should acquire based on the skill evaluation selection data of the employee.

4. The storage means further stores all-employee past work data that summarizes the work that each employee has been involved in in the past for each employee, 3. The personnel evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising a past work skill improvement suggestion means for suggesting the skill evaluation item data that the employee should or should acquire based on the past work data of the employee's past work input by the input means and the past work data of all employees.

5. The personnel evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising a next year's salary calculation means for calculating the next year's planned salary of the employee based on the personnel evaluation values ​​of all employees, the personnel evaluation values ​​of the employee, and the total next year's planned salary amount to be paid as the salary of all employees in the next year.

Images