Design proposal review support system

Abstract

We provide a user-friendly design proposal review support system. [Solution] A design proposal review system A for supporting the review of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work, accessible from a user's terminal, comprises at least: a design proposal extraction unit 10 that extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions entered by user B from terminal C; a result display unit 20 that displays the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit 10 on a screen; and a comparison table generation unit 30 that generates a comparison table of the design proposal selected by user B from the one or more design proposals extracted by the design proposal extraction unit 10. The comparison table generated by the comparison table generation unit 30 can be downloaded as a template for documents that the user needs to prepare when presenting multiple design proposals to a business partner, thus contributing to improving the convenience of document creation work performed by the user.

Description

【Technical Field】 【0001】 The present invention relates to a design plan review support system for assisting in the review of an adopted design plan by extracting a design plan that meets the design conditions input by a user in construction work. 【Background Art】 【0002】 As a system for automatically selecting a construction method suitable for the conditions at a construction site, the following prior art documents are known. For example, in the system disclosed in Patent Document 1, a system for selecting one or more civil engineering construction methods that match the input data is disclosed by inputting data on the type of construction, the planned cross-section of the construction site, and the planned conditions. In addition, the applicant has opened the website described in Non-Patent Document 1 below as a service for assisting in the simple design of a temporary bridge. 【Prior Art Documents】 【Patent Documents】 【0003】 【Patent Document 1】 Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-146825 【Non-Patent Documents】 【0004】 【Patent Document 2】 https: / / www.kyoryo-net.jp / top.aspx 【Summary of the Invention】 【Problems to be Solved by the Invention】 【0005】 One of the objects of the present invention is to provide a design plan review support system that is more convenient for users as compared with the systems or services according to the above-described prior art documents. 【Means for Solving the Problems】 【0006】 The present invention, made to solve the above problems, is a system for supporting the examination of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work, accessible from a user's terminal, and is characterized by comprising at least: a design proposal extraction unit that extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions input by the user from the terminal; a result display unit that displays the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit on a screen; and a comparison table generation unit that generates a comparison table of design proposals selected by the user from the one or more design proposals extracted by the design proposal extraction unit. Furthermore, in the present invention, the comparison table generation unit may be configured to have a function that highlights the differences in design conditions and / or detailed information among all design proposals or among the design proposals being compared, on the design proposal selection screen for generating the comparison table. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that the comparison table generation unit has a function to insert sample text that requires user addition or modification into at least some of the items in the comparison table. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that the design proposal extraction unit has a function that allows the user to select whether to proceed with a multiple extraction process that extracts multiple design proposals or a single extraction process that extracts one design proposal, and the comparison table generation unit has a function that generates a comparison table of the design proposals selected by the user from the design proposals extracted in each of the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process. Furthermore, in the present invention, the design proposal extraction unit may be configured to have a function that changes the input order of subsequent design conditions according to the design conditions entered by the user when prompting the user to input design conditions in an interactive manner during the multiple extraction process and / or the single extraction process. Furthermore, in the present invention, the comparison table generation unit may be configured to have a function that allows the user to download the comparison table as tabular data. [Effects of the Invention] 【0007】 According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a design consideration support system with better convenience when proceeding with the consideration of a design plan that conforms to the conditions of a construction site. 【Brief Description of the Drawings】 【0008】 [Figure 1] Schematic diagram showing the overall configuration of the design consideration support system according to the present invention. [Figure 2] Image diagram (1) of the condition input screen in the multiple extraction process. [Figure 3] Image diagram (2) of the condition input screen in the multiple extraction process. [Figure 4] Image diagram (3) of the condition input screen in the multiple extraction process. [Figure 5] Image diagram (4) of the condition input screen in the multiple extraction process. [Figure 6] Image diagram (5) of the condition input screen in the multiple extraction process. [Figure 7] Image diagram of the multiple extraction result screen. [Figure 8] Image diagram (1) of the design plan selection screen. [Figure 9] Image diagram of the comparison table screen. [Figure 10] Image diagram of the comparison table list screen. [Figure 11] Image diagram (1) of the condition input screen in the single extraction process. [Figure 12] Image diagram (2) of the condition input screen in the single extraction process. [Figure 13] Image diagram (3) of the condition input screen in the single extraction process. [Figure 14] Image diagram (4) of the condition input screen in the single extraction process. [Figure 15] Image diagram of the single extraction result screen. [Figure 16] Image diagram (2) of the design plan selection screen. 【Modes for Carrying Out the Invention】 【0009】 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. 【Embodiment】 【0010】 <1>Overview (Fig. 1) The design proposal examination support system A according to the present invention (hereinafter, may also be simply referred to as "support system A") can be used for examining design proposals suitable for construction work. Examples of the examination targets include temporary structures such as temporary bridges, temporary bridges, temporary trestles, and retaining structures. As an example, an embodiment in the case where the support system A according to the present invention is applied to the examination of design proposals for temporary structures will be described with reference to each drawing. 【0011】 <1.1>Premise The support system A according to the present invention is accessed and used from a terminal (using terminal C) used by user B through various networks such as the Internet line, LAN, and WAN. In this embodiment, the support system according to the present invention is applied to a SaaS (Software as a Service) type system that is logged in and used from the WEB browser of a terminal (using terminal C) that can be used by user B. 【0012】 <1.2>Attributes of the user User B who uses the support system A according to the present invention is not limited to the person in charge of design consultation or the orderer who examines the design proposal in construction work, but also includes salespersons and technicians belonging to the company that provides this support system. In addition, the using terminal C of user B can use a PC, a smartphone, a tablet, or other information processing devices. 【0013】 <1.3>Overall configuration The support system A according to the present invention includes at least a design proposal extraction unit 10, a result display unit 20, and a comparison table generation unit 30. Each component can be implemented by arbitrarily combining hardware and software, and various configurations can be adopted, such as each component being a separate device, or multiple components being integrated into a single device. The details of each part are explained below. 【0014】 <2> Design proposal extraction unit (Figure 1) The design proposal extraction unit 10 is a processing unit that has at least the function of extracting at least one design proposal based on the design conditions entered by user B from user B's terminal C. More specifically, the design proposal extraction unit 10 has a function to display an input screen for design conditions on the display of user B's terminal C, and a function to extract at least one candidate design proposal based on the design conditions entered by user B from this input screen. In this invention, "input" by the user includes selecting conditions using checkboxes or pull-down menus displayed on the condition input screen. Details of the screen displayed on user B's terminal C by the design proposal extraction unit 10 will be described later. <5> This section explains the items related to screen images. 【0015】 <2.1>Design conditions Design conditions are the criteria used when considering design proposals for construction work. For example, if User B's subject of study is a temporary structure, Table 1 below shows an example of design conditions that require user input. 【0016】 [Table 1] TIFF2026095931000002.tif201151 【0017】 Depending on whether User B selects the multiple extraction process or the single extraction process described later, and depending on the design conditions entered by User B during each extraction process, some of these items may have their condition input omitted, be automatically entered by the design proposal extraction unit 10, or have their display omitted altogether. 【0018】 <2.2>Selection of Design Condition Input Method In the present invention, the design proposal extraction unit 10 may be configured so that when User B inputs design conditions, User B can select which of the multiple extraction process and single extraction process described below to proceed with. The details of each extraction process are described below. 【0019】 <2.2.1> Multiple Extraction Processing The multiple extraction process displays the design conditions that user B needs to input on the display of terminal C. After user B has entered the design conditions for each item, the process extracts multiple design proposals that satisfy those conditions. In this process, the input fields for user B to input design conditions on the screen may be configured to be displayed as a list on the screen of terminal C from the beginning, or the design conditions to be entered may be displayed sequentially in an interactive format. This process is particularly suitable when User B wants to compare and contrast multiple design options (such as different construction methods). 【0020】 <2.2.2> Single Extraction Processing The single extraction process displays design conditions that require input from User B on the screen, and after User B has entered the design conditions for each item, it extracts only one design proposal that satisfies those design conditions. In this process, the input fields for user B to input design conditions on the screen may be configured to be displayed as a list on the screen of terminal C from the beginning, similar to the multiple extraction process described above, or they may be configured to display the design conditions to be entered in an interactive format in order. This process is particularly suitable for users with extensive design experience, such as User B, who has already largely decided on the construction method to be adopted. 【0021】 <2.2.3> Contents and display order of design conditions for each extraction process In this invention, the content and input order of the design conditions entered in each extraction process do not need to be the same. For example, in a single extraction process, design conditions not present in a multiple extraction process may be added to narrow down to a single design proposal, or when prompting the user to input design conditions interactively in each extraction process, the order in which subsequent design conditions are entered may be changed according to the design conditions entered by the user. 【0022】 <2.3>Calculation Process (Figure 1) The design proposal extraction unit 10 may be configured to perform calculations for the construction period and construction costs for each design proposal in conjunction with the design proposal extraction process. As shown in Figure 1, the support system according to this embodiment includes a database (hereinafter also referred to as "DB") of various information necessary for estimating construction period and construction costs. The following is an example of a database. 【0023】 <2.3.1>Quantity summary table DB The quantity summary table DB40 is a database that records the unit quantities of each component used in the construction methods adopted in the design proposal. The design proposal extraction unit 10 reads the quantities of each component used in the construction method selected from the extracted design proposals from the quantity summary table DB40 and uses them for cost estimation. 【0024】 <2.3.2>Price Database The Price Database DB50 is a database that records the unit prices of each component used in a design proposal. The design proposal extraction unit 10 reads out the unit price of each component used in the construction method selected from the extracted design proposal and uses it for cost estimation. Furthermore, since the unit price of each component may vary depending on the construction area and time of construction, the price database DB50 may be updated as needed by incorporating publicly available price information. 【0025】 <3> Result display section (Figure 1) The results display unit 20 is a processing unit that has the function of displaying the extraction results by the design proposal extraction unit 10 on the screen of user B's terminal C. Details of the screen displayed on user B's terminal C by the results display unit 20 will be described later. <5> This section explains the items related to screen images. 【0026】 <3.1> Display items for the design proposal The display items of the design proposal extracted by the design proposal extraction unit 10 may include some or all of the design conditions entered by User B as described in Table 1 above, as well as detailed information as shown in Table 2 below. 【0027】 [Table 2] TIFF2026095931000003.tif72151 【0028】 The results display unit 20 may be configured to display separately a column for displaying a list of extracted design proposals and a column for displaying detailed information of the design proposal selected by user B. Furthermore, in the section displaying the list of design proposals, only some of the items listed in Table 2 above may be displayed. Furthermore, the section displaying detailed information about the design proposal may be configured to also display the design conditions entered by User B (information included in Table 1 above). 【0029】 <4> Comparison table generation unit (Figure 1) The comparison table generation unit 30 is a processing unit that has the function of generating a comparison table of the design proposals selected by user B from among at least one design proposal extracted by the design proposal extraction unit 10. More specifically, the comparison table generation unit 30 selects multiple design proposals from the multiple design proposals displayed on user B's terminal C, and then selects to execute the comparison table generation. In this way, the unit displays a comparison table on user B's terminal C that shows the contents of each design proposal, construction period, construction cost, and other information in tabular format. The details of the screen displayed on the user B's terminal C by the comparison table generation unit 30 will be described later. <5> This section explains the items related to screen images. 【0030】 <4.1> Target of comparison table generation In the comparison table generation unit 30, the design proposals that are the subject of the comparison table generation are not limited to the design proposals displayed on the screen via the results display unit 20 immediately after the extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10, but may also be design proposals that have been extracted and saved in the past, or the unit may be configured to allow selection of these design proposals across the board. For example, for design proposals that share the same property name or region name as a design condition, the design proposals extracted using the multiple extraction process and those extracted using the single extraction process can be classified into the same group. This way, each design proposal can be included in the list of items to be included in the comparison table, regardless of whether it was extracted using the multiple or single extraction process. 【0031】 <4.2> Item highlighting function In the present invention, the comparison table generation unit 30 may be provided with a function that highlights the differences in the design conditions (Table 1) and / or detailed information (Table 2) entered by user B, either among all the design proposals or among the design proposals selected as comparison targets, on the design proposal selection screen for generating the comparison table. 【0032】 <4.3> Insertion function for sample text In the present invention, the comparison table generation unit 30 may be provided with a function to insert sample text (template text) that requires addition or modification by user B into at least some of the items in the comparison table to be generated. This feature allows user B to create a new comparison table using sample text pre-inserted into any item of the comparison table generated by this system as a guide. More specifically, by including both optional descriptions as sample text, user B can prepare a new comparison table simply by deleting one of the optional descriptions. 【0033】 <4.4> Download function for comparison tables In this invention, the comparison table generation unit 30 may be provided with a function that allows the generated comparison table to be downloaded as tabular data. Furthermore, the comparison tables available for download are not limited to those generated immediately after the extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10, but may also be comparison tables that have been generated and saved in the past. This feature allows User B to directly modify the tabular comparison table downloaded from this system using spreadsheet software when generating comparison tables for clients, thus reducing the workload of preparing documents to submit to business partners. 【0034】 <5> Screen image (1) [Multiple extraction process] (Figures 2-10) This section describes the screen transitions displayed on user B's terminal C when user B accesses the support system according to the present invention and extracts design proposals using multiple extraction methods. In the present invention, the layout of each screen displayed on user B's terminal C is not particularly limited, and a configuration that changes to a suitable layout according to the display size and resolution of terminal C (such as a so-called "responsive design") may be adopted. 【0035】 (1) Condition input screen (Figures 2-6) Figures 2 to 6 show the condition input screens 100 that are displayed on the user B's terminal C by the design proposal extraction unit 10 after user B logs in to the support system according to the present invention. 【0036】 The condition input screen 100 shown in Figure 2 has a menu bar 110 on the left side of the screen. User B has selected the "New Design" button 111 in the menu bar 110, and the first selection button 121 ("Standard Mode"), which is displayed as a tab in the upper area of ​​the area from the center to the right of the screen, has been selected. In the remaining area, there is a first input field 131 where User B can input various design conditions, such as the property name and region as basic information. After the design conditions related to this first input field 131 are entered, new input fields will be displayed below as needed, prompting User B to input design conditions. 【0037】 Figure 3 shows a second input field 132 for entering the temporary construction method. In standard mode (multiple extraction processing), there is no selection of construction methods; only the choice between vertical or horizontal temporary construction is made. 【0038】 Figure 4 shows, in addition to the third input field 133 mentioned above, a third input field 133 for inputting the substructure type and a fourth input field 134 for inputting load conditions, etc. In this embodiment, based on the inputs in the first input field 131 and the second input field 132, the third input field 133 and the fourth input field 134 have limited options, so the design conditions have been automatically entered by the design proposal extraction unit 10, and each field is grayed out, meaning that user B cannot input anything. 【0039】 Figure 5 shows a fifth input field 135 for inputting pile specifications, in addition to the fourth input field 134 mentioned above. 【0040】 Figure 6 shows, in addition to the fifth input field 135 mentioned above, a sixth input field 136 for inputting the effective width, a seventh input field 137 for inputting the bridge length, and an extraction execution button 140 for instructing the execution of the design proposal extraction process. When User B selects the extraction execution button 140 located on the condition input screen 100 shown in Figure 6, the design proposal extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10 is executed. 【0041】 (2) Multiple extraction results screen (Figure 7) Figure 7 is a multiple extraction results screen 200 that shows the extraction results from the multiple extraction process, as displayed by the results display unit 20. The multiple extraction results screen 200 shown in Figure 7 has an extraction results section 210 on the left side of the screen that displays a list of extracted design proposals, and a design proposal details section 220 on the right side of the screen that displays the detailed contents of the design proposal selected by user B from the extraction results section 210. These extraction results are saved by the system and can be referenced later by selecting the design history button 112 in the menu bar 110 shown in Figure 8. 【0042】 (3) Design proposal selection screen (Figure 8) Figure 8 shows the design proposal selection screen 300, which is used by the comparison table generation unit 30 to select the design proposal to be included in the comparison table generation from the extraction results of the design proposals. The design proposal selection screen 300 shown in Figure 8 allows users to select the design history button 112 in the menu bar 110 on the left side of the screen, and then select the tab-style design proposal list button located at the top center of the screen. Below this button, a list of design proposals saved by the system is displayed. 【0043】 When a checkbox is selected for each design proposal, items that differ between the selected design proposals in terms of user-entered design conditions or detailed information (such as construction methods used and cost estimation results) will be highlighted by changing the color of the item column or making the text within the item bold (transition to highlighted items 311). 【0044】 In Figure 8, three design options are selected. After entering an arbitrary name in the comparison table name input field located at the bottom of the comparison table screen 400, the user selects the comparison table generation execution button 313. The comparison table generation unit 30 then performs the comparison table generation process, saves the generated comparison table on the system side, and displays the comparison table screen 400 shown in Figure 9. 【0045】 (4) Comparison table screen (Figure 9) Figure 9 shows the comparison table screen 400, which displays the comparison table generated by the comparison table generation unit 30. The comparison table arranges each design proposal in the columns, and in the rows, it contains the design conditions used to select each design proposal, the cost estimation results, and detailed information items that are saved as templates for each construction method in the system. 【0046】 In the comparison table screen 400 shown in Figure 9, there is a field within the detailed content section where sample text (template text) that user B needs to add or modify is written (sample text entry field 410). In this embodiment, each item in the comparison table cannot be edited by user B, but in the future, each item in the comparison table screen 400 may be configured to be editable. 【0047】 By selecting the download button 420, user B can download the comparison table displayed on the comparison table screen 400 as tabular data to their own device C. User B can quickly create a comparison table to provide to their business partners, etc., by editing the downloaded comparison table as needed. 【0048】 (5) Comparison table list screen (Figure 10) Figure 10 is a comparison table list screen 500, which shows a list of the generated comparison tables shown in Figure 8. The comparison table list screen 500 shown in Figure 10 displays the selected design proposals for each comparison table name entered in Figure 8. This is achieved by selecting the design history button 112 in the menu bar 110 on the left side of the screen, and then selecting the tab-style comparison table list selection button 132 located at the top center of the screen. Additionally, each comparison table has a pull-down menu that allows users to rename, download, delete, and perform other actions. 【0049】 <6> Screen image (2) [Single extraction process] (Figures 11-15) Next, we will describe the screen transitions displayed on user B's terminal C when user B accesses the support system according to the present invention and performs a single extraction process to extract design proposals. 【0050】 (1) Condition input screen (Figures 11-14) Figures 11 to 14 show the condition input screens 100 displayed on the user B's terminal C by the design proposal extraction unit 10 when user B performs a single extraction process to extract design proposals after logging into the support system according to the present invention. The condition input screen 100 shown in Figure 11 has a menu bar 110 on the left side of the screen. User B has selected the "New Design" button 111 in the menu bar 110, and the first selection button 122 ("Custom Mode"), which is displayed as a tab in the upper part of the area from the center to the right of the screen, has been selected. In the remaining area, there is a first input field 131 where User B can input various design conditions, such as the property name and region as basic information. After the design conditions related to this first input field 131 are entered, new input fields will be displayed below as needed, prompting User B to input design conditions. 【0051】 Figure 12 shows a second input field 132 for entering the temporary construction method. In custom mode (single extraction processing), the construction method selection items, which were omitted in standard mode (multiple extraction processing), can also be entered. 【0052】 Figure 13 shows a third input field 133 for entering load conditions, etc., and a fourth input field 134 for entering pile specifications. Note that in the standard mode (multiple extraction processing) shown in Figure 4, the third input field 133 was for entering the substructure type, and the fourth input field 134 was for entering load conditions, etc., so the order in which design conditions are entered in an interactive format differs between the standard mode (multiple extraction processing) and the custom mode (single extraction processing). 【0053】 Figure 14 shows a fifth input field 135 for inputting the span length as bridge dimension 1, a sixth input field 136 for inputting the span length and effective width as bridge dimension 2, and an extraction execution button 140 for instructing the execution of the design proposal extraction process. When User B selects the extraction execution button 140 located on the condition input screen 100 shown in Figure 14, the design proposal extraction process by the design proposal extraction unit 10 is executed. 【0054】 (2) Single extraction result screen (Figure 15) Figure 15 is a single extraction result screen 600 showing the extraction results of the single extraction process by the results display unit 20. The single extraction result screen 600 shown in Figure 15 is displayed as a pop-up overlaid on the condition input screen 100 shown in Figures 11 to 14, and displays the detailed contents of a single design proposal. After entering the name of an arbitrary design proposal in the design proposal name input field 610 located in the upper left of this single extraction result screen 600, the extracted design proposal can be saved by selecting the design proposal save button 620 located in the lower right of the screen. 【0055】 (3) Design proposal selection screen (Figure 16) Figure 16 shows the design proposal selection screen 300, which is used by the comparison table generation unit 30 to select the design proposal to be included in the comparison table generation from the extraction results of the design proposals. The design proposal selection screen 300 shown in Figure 16 allows users to select the design history button 112 in the menu bar 110 on the left side of the screen, and then select the tab-style design proposal list button located at the top center of the screen. Below this button, a list of design proposals saved by the system is displayed. 【0056】 If the user selects the "Add Design" button 314 located on the right side of the design selection screen 300, the design extraction unit 10 displays a condition input screen 100 on user B's terminal C. This condition input screen 100, shown in Figure 11, has a first input field 131 that already reflects the same property name and region ("Custom" and "Aichi Prefecture" in Figure 16). 【0057】 This process allows user B to input different design conditions and add other design proposals that have been processed through a single extraction process to the design proposal selection screen 300 shown in Figure 16. The process for selecting saved design proposals, generating a comparison table, and downloading it is as described above. <5> Since there is no significant difference from (3) to (5), the explanation will be omitted. 【0058】 <7> summary According to the design proposal review system of the present invention, at least one of the effects described below can be obtained. (1) When users consider design proposals, they can choose to extract multiple design proposals simultaneously or narrow it down to a single design proposal, allowing the system to perform the optimal design proposal extraction process according to the phase of the design proposal review work and the user's skill level. (2) Multiple design proposals presented on the display screen can be viewed by the user in the form of a comparison table, improving the convenience of the user's design proposal selection process. (3) When a user presents multiple design proposals to a business partner, the comparison table generated by this system can be downloaded as tabular data, thus improving the convenience of the document creation work performed by the user. (4) Since it is possible to generate a comparison table that mixes design proposals extracted by multiple extraction processes and design proposals extracted by single extraction processes, the convenience of the user's comparison table creation work is improved. (5) By changing the order in which users are asked to input design conditions interactively for multiple extraction processes and single extraction processes, it is possible to realize an input procedure for design conditions that allows for faster narrowing down to a single design proposal in single extraction processes. [Explanation of Symbols] 【0059】 A: Design proposal review support system (support system) B: User C: Device used 10: Design proposal extraction section 20:Result display area 30: Comparison table generator 40:Quantity summary table DB 50: Price Database 100: Condition Input Screen 110: Menu section 111: New Design Button 112: Design History Button 121: First selection button 122: Second selection button 131: Design Proposal List Selection Button 132: Comparison Table List Selection Button 131-137: Input field 1 to input field 7 140: Extraction execution button 200: Multiple Extraction Results Screen 210: Extraction result column 220:Design proposal details column 300: Design proposal selection screen 311: Highlighted item 312: Input field for comparison table name 313: Button to generate comparison table 314: Add Design Proposal Button 400: Comparison table screen 410: Sample text entry field 420: Download button 500: Comparison Table List Screen 600: Single Extraction Results Screen 610: Design proposal name input field 620: Save design proposal button

Claims

[Claim 1] A system that can be accessed from the user's terminal to support the examination of design proposals for temporary structures in construction work, A design proposal extraction unit extracts one or more design proposals based on design conditions entered by the user from the aforementioned terminal, A results display unit that displays the extraction results from the design proposal extraction unit on the screen, A comparison table generation unit generates a comparison table of design proposals selected by the user from one or more design proposals extracted by the aforementioned design proposal extraction unit. Characterized by comprising at least the following: A system to support the review of design proposals for construction projects. [Claim 2] The comparison table generation unit, The design selection screen for generating the comparison table is characterized by having a function that highlights differences in design conditions and / or detailed information among all design proposals or among the design proposals being compared. A design proposal review support system according to claim 1. [Claim 3] The comparison table generation unit, The comparison table is characterized by having a function to insert sample text that requires user addition or modification into at least some of the items. A design proposal review support system according to claim 1. [Claim 4] The aforementioned design proposal extraction unit, It has a function that allows the user to select whether to proceed with a multiple extraction process that extracts multiple design proposals, or a single extraction process that extracts one design proposal. The comparison table generation unit, The system is characterized by having a function to generate a comparison table of design proposals selected by the user, cross-sectionally from the design proposals extracted in each of the multiple extraction processes and / or the single extraction process. A design proposal review support system according to claim 1. [Claim 5] The aforementioned design proposal extraction unit, The above-mentioned multiple extraction process and / or single extraction process is characterized by having a function that changes the input order of subsequent design conditions according to the design conditions entered by the user when prompting the user to input design conditions in an interactive manner. The design proposal review support system according to claim 4. [Claim 6] The comparison table generation unit, The system is characterized by having a function that allows users to download the comparison table as tabular data. A design proposal review support system according to claim 1.

Images