Multimodal transport baggage screening and image sharing system

Abstract

This disclosure relates to a method and system for uploading a baggage image collection, including images of the contents of baggage items, to a cloud storage system. This collection is acquired by a computed tomography imaging system. The scanner scans the identification information on the baggage items and obtains a baggage identification record that identifies the item and passenger data associated with the first mode of transport (FMOT). A screening manifest is inferred from this record and lists the second modes of transport (SMOT) that require baggage screening based on rules and regulations specific to SMOT, which are different from those of FMOT. Images of the accessed content are re-analyzed to determine whether the content complies with the rules and regulations of the SMOT. An authentication record is created and lists the security compliance results for the SMOT. If the compliance result is positive, the baggage items can bypass baggage screening by the SMOT.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] Claim of Priority

[0002] This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 18 / 418,972, filed on January 22, 2024, entitled "Luggage Image Reanalysis for Multimodal Mobility", which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 18 / 197,840, filed on May 16, 2023, entitled "Multimodal Transportation Luggage Screening and Image Sharing System". The disclosure of the above applications is hereby incorporated by reference into this application.

[0003] Background of the Invention

[0004] 1. Field of the Invention

[0005] The present invention relates to the field of transportation, more specifically to the security screening of checked luggage.

[0006]

Background Art

[0007] 2. Overview of Related Technologies In travel by various means of transportation, security screening is required to ensure the safety and security of all passengers. This process may seem simple to travelers, but it is a complex check-and-balance system that utilizes both human and technical resources.

[0008] At the airport, this process begins when passengers check in their baggage. Check-in staff attach a unique barcode tag to each piece of baggage, which simultaneously assigns an electronic baggage source message (BSM) linked to the passenger's boarding pass information. After check-in, baggage is transported to the baggage handling area via an automated conveyor system. Initial screening is performed using large X-ray machines. These machines are designed to detect a variety of substances, including explosives and other prohibited items. Baggage is inspected using a dual-energy X-ray system, allowing security personnel to distinguish between organic and inorganic materials based on their atomic number. This enables the identification of potentially hazardous materials. If suspicious items are detected during the X-ray inspection, the baggage is separated for further inspection. Typically, a physical inspection is performed by trained security officers, sometimes in conjunction with advanced scanning techniques such as CT (computed tomography) scanners, which can provide detailed 3D images of the baggage contents. In some cases, explosive trace detection devices (ETDs) may also be used. These devices can detect traces of explosives on items inside or outside luggage. They work by swabbing luggage or items with a cotton swab and analyzing the swab sample to detect any explosive residue.

[0009] The baggage screening process on cruise ships is similar to that at airports, but there are some differences due to the nature of sea travel. When passengers arrive at the cruise terminal, their baggage is checked in and tagged. The baggage then passes through large X-ray scanners similar to those used at airports. These devices detect prohibited items, from weapons and explosives to items prohibited from being carried on board, such as alcohol and irons. Baggage that triggers an alarm during the X-ray scan is set aside for further inspection. This is usually done manually by security personnel. If prohibited items are found, they are usually confiscated and may be returned to the passenger at the end of the cruise. In addition to the initial baggage screening, passengers and their carry-on baggage are also screened before boarding. This is usually done using walk-behind metal detectors and X-ray scanners similar to those at airport security checkpoints.

[0010] Security procedures for railway systems vary significantly depending on the country and the specific railway service. However, many major railway systems implement some form of security screening for both passengers and their baggage. In some cases, security personnel may randomly select baggage to screen using handheld metal detectors or portable X-ray devices. In other cases, all baggage may be screened using fixed X-ray devices, similar to those used at airports and cruise terminals. More thorough screening procedures may be employed in situations requiring high security or on international train services. These may include the use of explosive detection systems, detection dogs, and even CT scanners. In addition, passengers themselves may be screened using metal detectors and body scanners.

[0011] The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screens baggage using a variety of imaging technologies, including X-ray scanners and computed tomography (CT) scanners. These technologies produce images in different formats, such as 2D and 3D. X-ray scanners are commonly used to screen checked baggage and carry-on baggage. They generate 2D images by irradiating the baggage with X-rays and capturing the radiation that passes through the items. The generated images allow the shape and density of objects within the baggage to be seen, helping to identify potential threats. Computed tomography (CT) scanners are a more advanced technology than conventional X-ray scanners and are increasingly being used for baggage screening. CT scanners use X-ray technology to take multiple images from different angles, and a computer combines these images to create a 3D representation of the baggage contents. Because CT scanners provide higher resolution and more detailed images, security personnel can more accurately identify potential threats and reduce false alarms.

[0012] The CT scanners used by the TSA for baggage screening are manufactured by multiple vendors. Representative vendors include, for example:

[0013] Smith Detection: Smith Detection is a leading provider of advanced security solutions, including CT scanners. Its HI-SCAN XCT series scanners (such as the HI-SCAN 6040 XCT and HI-SCAN 7555 XCT) are designed for screening checked baggage and carry-on baggage at airports.

[0014] L3 Harris Technologies: L3 Harris Technologies is also a leading supplier of security equipment, including CT scanners for baggage screening. Its CLEARSCAN brand of CT scanners is used by the TSA at several airports across the United States.

[0015] ANALOGIC Corporation: ANALOGIC Corporation develops advanced imaging technologies, including CT scanners for airport security. Its CONNECT brand series of scanners (such as the CONNECT70 and CONNECT100) are designed to enhance airport security screening.

[0016] LEIDOS (formerly Lockheed Martin): LEIDOS is a global technology company that provides security solutions, including CT scanners for baggage screening. The company developed the VACIS M6500 system, a high-performance CT scanner for baggage inspection at airports.

[0017] CT images generated during baggage screening are typically stored in a multi-image format. This format allows for the exchange, storage, and transmission of images between different systems and devices. CT scanners capture a series of 2D cross-sectional images and reconstruct them into a 3D image of the scanned object. 3D visualization and analysis of CT images often utilize specialized software designed for processing and rendering multi-image files. These software solutions reconstruct 2D cross-sections into 3D models, enabling security personnel to inspect scanned baggage in detail.

[0018] The DICOS (Digital Imaging and Communications for Security) standard is an image format standard developed jointly by NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Its aim is to improve the interoperability and effectiveness of security screening systems used in airports, critical infrastructure facilities, and other locations. DICOS is designed to meet the specific needs of security imaging, including the storage, transmission, and processing of security images. It addresses the limitations of the DICOM (Medical Digital Image Communications) standard, which primarily focuses on medical images. The DICOS standard provides the following features: a. Interoperability: DICOS enables seamless communication between security imaging systems and components from different manufacturers, resulting in more efficient and effective security screening processes. b. Scalability: The DICOS standard is designed to easily incorporate and adapt to the latest technologies and techniques emerging in the field of security imaging. c. Flexibility: DICOS supports a wide range of security imaging modalities, including X-ray, CT, and MRI, making it suitable for various security applications.

[0019] The size of a TSA file varies greatly depending on several factors, including the scanner resolution, the number of slices acquired, the compression level applied, and the size of the luggage being scanned. Generally, CT scans generate many high-resolution images, so the file size can be very large. A single multi-image file for a CT scan ranges from several hundred kilobytes to several megabytes. Considering a scan of an entire piece of luggage, which may contain multiple files, the total size can easily reach tens of megabytes, and in some cases, hundreds of megabytes.

[0020] It's not uncommon for travelers to go through multiple modes of transport and screening by multiple government agencies. For example, this might occur when traveling by plane from an airport to a port and then boarding a cruise ship. However, for security reasons, security requirements can differ depending on the mode of transport. Items permitted on an airplane may not be permitted on board. While specific lists of prohibited items vary by cruise company, common items permitted on an airplane but prohibited on a cruise ship include, for example: a. Alcohol: Many cruise line companies have strict policies regarding personal alcohol consumption on board. While limited amounts of alcohol can be carried in checked baggage on airplanes, cruise line companies often limit or restrict the amount that can be brought on board. b. Power strips: Power strips, surge protectors, and extension cords are usually permitted in carry-on or checked baggage, but are prohibited on many cruise ships due to the risk of fire. c. Ironing clothes: Ironing clothes is usually permitted in checked baggage on airplanes, but is often prohibited on cruise ships. Cruise ships usually provide laundry services with irons or self-service laundry facilities. d. Swimming rings: These are permitted on airplanes, but may not be allowed on cruise ships due to pool space limitations and safety concerns. e. Drones: While some airlines allow them as carry-on or checked baggage, most cruise ships prohibit them for safety and privacy reasons. f. Hoverboards and similar devices: They are usually permitted on aircraft if they meet specific battery requirements. However, they are prohibited on many cruise ships due to fire hazards and safety concerns. g. Sports equipment: Certain sports equipment, such as baseball bats and golf clubs, may be permitted as checked baggage on airplanes but may be restricted or prohibited on cruise ships.

[0021] Similarly, certain items that are permitted on an aircraft may be prohibited or restricted on a train. For example: a. Large luggage: Airlines usually permit checked luggage within size and weight limits, but trains often have stricter size limits or limited storage space for large suitcases. b. Bicycles: Many airlines permit bicycles as checked luggage, but not all trains do, and reservations or additional fees may be required. c. Sports equipment: Certain sports equipment such as surfboards, skis, and golf clubs that are permitted as checked luggage on an aircraft may be restricted or prohibited on a train. d. Camping supplies: Camping supplies such as portable stoves, fuel cans, and tents with pegs may be permitted as checked luggage on an aircraft, but may be restricted or prohibited on a train. e. Musical instruments: Airlines often permit musical instruments as carry-on or checked luggage, but some trains may have size and weight restrictions on these items. f. Dangerous goods: Items such as flammable liquids, compressed gases, and corrosive substances may be permitted in limited quantities on an aircraft, but may be subject to stricter regulations on a train.

[0022] The United States Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), railway / train, hotel / resort security agencies, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cooperate to establish security guidelines and regulations to ensure the safety and security of cruise ship, aircraft, railway passengers, hotel / resort guests, and their luggage. This includes passenger and luggage screening procedures, lists of restricted items, and other security measures specific to each transportation and government agency.

[0023] Summary of the Invention

Summary of the Invention

Means for Solving the Problems

[0024] The present invention includes a method for enhancing the efficiency of baggage screening across multiple means of transportation. The process begins with a first security agency (FSA) scanning a baggage item using a computed tomography (CT) imaging system, which exports an image of the contents of the baggage to a collection. Also scanned are the machine-readable license plate identifier of the baggage item and / or the baggage source message (BSM), which uniquely identify the baggage and associated passenger data. This data, which includes the image collection, license plate identifier, and / or BSM, is then uploaded to a secure cloud storage system managed by a second screening agency (SSA).

[0025] The SSA extrapolates a screening manifest from the license plate identifier and / or the baggage source message, which specifies in detail subsequent means of transportation that require baggage screening under different rules and regulations. The stored baggage images are re-analyzed based on these specific rules, and compliance results are determined. This result is represented by an indicium attached to the baggage, indicating whether the baggage is to be directly delivered by a trusted custodian or sent for additional physical security screening.

[0026] The method also proposes using the Digital Imaging and Communication in Security (DICOS) standard to collect baggage images. A passenger name record (PNR) is extracted from the baggage license plate identifier and / or the baggage source message (BSM) to obtain the owner's travel plan. For privacy protection, a hash of the license plate identifier is generated in the secure cloud storage system so that the entity performing the re-analysis cannot access the passenger details.

[0027] As an additional feature, an adhesive label indicating the security compliance result is attached to the baggage, providing information on why a negative compliance result was returned. During re-analysis, the system visually annotates the baggage image to highlight the object that caused the negative compliance result. If a negative compliance result is obtained, the baggage owner is electronically notified with an explanation selected from a standardized list. For security reasons, the annotated image of the object causing the negative result is encrypted and signed by the SSA using a public / private key pair and transferred to the security facility of the second mode of transport.

[0028] Brief explanation of the drawing

[0029] To fully understand the present invention, please refer to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. [Brief explanation of the drawing]

[0030] [Figure 1] Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the present invention.

[0031] [Figure 2] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention showing a reliable storage and handling service between an airline and long-distance buses and / or trucks.

[0032] [Figure 3] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention showing a reliable custodian between long-distance buses and / or trucks and cruise ships.

[0033] [Figure 4] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention showing the generation of a baggage authentication identification (marking) to bypass additional baggage screening in two modes of transport.

[0034] [Figure 5]Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention showing the generation of a baggage authentication identification (marking) to bypass additional baggage screening in three modes of transport.

[0035] [Figure 6] Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention showing the generation of a baggage authentication identifier (marking) to bypass additional baggage screening in three modes of transport where the final mode of transport is flagged as subject to additional screening.

[0036] [Figure 7] Figure 7 shows a conceptual messaging graphical user interface on a mobile phone that facilitates the process of moving passenger baggage.

[0037] [Figure 8] Figure 8 shows a conceptual messaging graphical user interface on a mobile phone that facilitates the baggage transfer process for passengers requiring re-screening. [Modes for carrying out the invention]

[0038] Detailed explanation

[0039] The following detailed description of preferred embodiments will refer to the accompanying drawings, which constitute part of this specification and illustrate specific embodiments that can carry out the invention. It should be understood that other embodiments are available and can be modified without departing from the scope of the invention.

[0040] Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of an embodiment of the present invention, schematically shown in reference numeral 10. A first security agency (FSA) 12 screens checked baggage using X-ray and / or computed tomography (CT) images. The images are acquired during the initial scanning process along with the license plate and / or baggage source message (BSM) (collectively referred to as 14) of the checked baggage. The images and license plate and / or baggage source message (BSM) are securely transmitted to a second screening agency (SSA) 16. The SSA 16 passes the license plate and / or baggage source message (BSM) 18 to a travel information system (TIS) 20, which extracts additional passenger information, including the travel itinerary, from the license plate and / or baggage source message (BSM) 18 to create a screening manifest 22 (also called screening manifest data). This process is disclosed in U.S. Nonprovisional Application No. 18 / 104,359, “Return Flight Remote Passenger Check-in,” filed February 1, 2023, and its contents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In the example in Figure 1, the screening manifest 22 indicates that after arrival at the destination airport, the passenger’s checked baggage will be transported to the cruise ship 26 by bus or truck 24. The SSA 16 transmits or makes available the screening manifest 22 for reanalysis screening 30 (also known as reanalysis screening data). Reanalysis screening 30 is performed either at the physical location of the SSA 16 or through a secure remote connection by a qualified and authorized screening officer. In this case, the image reanalysis screening instance 32 is performed in accordance with the rules and regulations published for bus or truck travel 34 and onboard travel 36. Approval or rejection in accordance with the rules and regulations for each mode of transport is communicated to the SSA 16, which generates a baggage authentication record 33.

[0041] From the moment baggage is checked in at the airport, it is placed under the care of a trusted custodian (storage facility) 66, meaning that no unauthorized individual, including the baggage owner, can directly access its contents. Therefore, while under the care of the trusted custodian 66, the passenger has no opportunity to alter the contents of the baggage. Checked baggage on airlines, buses, rail, sea transport, or additional government agencies is handed over under the control of the transporter or storage facility. Upon receiving the baggage authentication record 33, the airline 50 (and / or its designated partner or authorized body) can transfer the checked baggage directly to the bus route or truck 52 without further re-screening at the bus terminal 62, as the re-analysis 30 has determined that the contents of the baggage meet the rules and regulations for bus transport 34. Furthermore, once the checked baggage is transported to the cruise ship terminal by bus route or truck 66, it is delivered directly to the passenger cabins on board the ship without further re-screening at the cruise ship terminal 64, as it has already cleared the re-analysis for onboard transport 36.

[0042] Figure 2 illustrates the nature of baggage movement according to an embodiment of the present invention. Aircraft 100 has a passenger cabin 104 and a baggage storage room 102. Passengers cannot access the baggage storage room 102 before, during, or after boarding. The operator of aircraft 100 stores the checked baggage in the baggage storage room 102. If a passenger uses a coach bus 101 which has a baggage storage area 103 and a separate passenger seating area 105, a trusted baggage handler 67 moves the passenger's baggage between the baggage storage room 102 of aircraft 100 and the baggage storage area 103 of the coach bus 101. The bus company may require screening of items in accordance with its own rules and / or regulatory rules for any baggage brought into the baggage storage area 103. However, in this case, under the rules and regulations for bus transport, the baggage is re-analyzed and its baggage authentication record 33 carries (transmits) approval 34a or rejection 34b of the baggage. If approval 34a is present in the baggage authentication record 33, the baggage can be moved directly from the baggage storage room 102 to the checked baggage storage room 103 without additional screening. On the other hand, if the baggage authentication record 33 indicates rejection 34b of the baggage, it is screened again at the bus terminal 62.

[0043] Figure 3 illustrates a similar process in which a long-distance bus 101 arrives at the cruise ship terminal and checked baggage from the baggage storage 103 on the long-distance bus 101 is received by a trusted baggage handler 67. The trusted baggage handler 67 checks the baggage authentication record 33 and determines whether the baggage can skip screening 64 at the cruise ship terminal because it has received approval 36b, or whether it needs to be screened at the cruise ship terminal because it has been rejected 36b.

[0044] Figure 4 shows a conventional airline baggage tag marker 150. The airline baggage tag marker 150 may include a passenger name 152, a departure airport flight identifier 154, a destination airport flight identifier 156, a 10-digit license plate 18, an adjacent barcoded license plate 19 and / or BSM record identifier. A barcode scanner 162 reads the barcode 19. The scanner 162 is communicatively coupled to the SSA 16 or its distributed data store, which has previously extracted relevant travel records from the TIS 20. The scanner 162 receives the baggage authentication 33 generated by the SSA 16 and the destination travel record from the TIS 20, and instructs the printer 164 to generate a secure destination tag 166, which incorporates existing information from the airline baggage tag marker 150 and additional details obtained from the SSA 16, the TIS 20, and the generated baggage authentication 33. In embodiments of the present invention, the cruise inline mode of travel is represented by a maritime mode identification (marking) 216, and the indication of passing screening under the cruise line and government security regulations is presented by a maritime approval identification (marking) 214. Additional details regarding the destination of baggage 220 on the cruise ship are listed in the cruise ship itinerary 218, including the cruise line, cruise ship, departure date, cabin number, deck number, and booking number. From the airport to the cruise ship, baggage 220 is placed under the care of a trusted custodian 66, and is accessible only to the trusted custodian 67. In other words, the passenger or owner of baggage 220 has no access to baggage 220 and therefore has no opportunity to insert smuggled goods or prohibited items from the initial screening by the FSA 12. It should also be noted that, in lieu of, or in addition to, physical marking of baggage by tag 166, the same information may be transmitted electronically to the facility responsible for baggage handling and customs clearance for security purposes. Therefore, it is possible to send equivalent fields, such as JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), to the API within the data payload, thereby transporting (transmitting) information that is essentially the same as the information that would normally be directly attached to the luggage.As long as the baggage retains its license plate and / or BSM identification, it can be tracked, and communication regarding security approval / denial at the next mode of transport can be done electronically as needed.

[0045] Figure 5 shows an embodiment of the present invention in which multiple modes of transport are pre-screened and approved for transport under the care of a trusted custodian 66. In this case, the rail mode identification 222 indicates that the baggage 220 is being transported from an aircraft to rail, and the rail approval identification 224 carries that the mode of transport has been pre-screened and approved. Details of the rail transport are carried in the rail itinerary 226, providing information for the trusted custodian 67 to deliver the baggage 220 to its appropriate destination. Figure 6 shows a variation of the process in which the maritime refusal identification 214b carries that the baggage 220 underwent pre-screening by the SSA 16 but did not pass the re-analysis screening 30. This is more beneficial than simply omitting the result because it facilitates re-screening at the cruise terminal by communicating that a concern exists. Thus, this process saves time, effort, and capital by skipping screening at the cruise terminal for baggage screened at the SSA, while simultaneously enhancing the safety of all crew and passengers. This is because, within this process, the baggage of concern will ultimately be screened three times and specifically noted as subject to additional screening. In embodiments of the present invention, each re-analysis screening 30 generates a unique identifier associated with the baggage 220, thereby allowing the re-analysis details to be associated with the baggage 220. This unique identifier may be a globally unique identifier (GUID), such as lb173Jb6-ae67-4df8-a8e9-eb7e625382bf. The GUID is printed as a machine-readable adhesive GUID label 231 and attached to the baggage 220. During screening at the cruise ship terminal, the GUID label 231 is scanned and securely linked to the results from the re-analysis screening 30 (including specific descriptions of non-compliance and on-image annotations) to facilitate the cruise ship terminal screening process.

[0046] Figure 7 shows a user interface 302 on a mobile device 300 that carries information regarding the status of baggage 220. In this embodiment, an enterprise messaging system sends the passenger baggage status and location information via SMS (Short Message Service). The message thread indicates that the passenger underwent re-analysis screening 30 during the flight and that the baggage passed all screening criteria for both the rail and cruise lines. Thus, instead of the passenger picking up baggage at the destination airport, transporting it to the rail terminal (where it undergoes a second screening), and then transporting it from the rail destination station to the cruise terminal (where it undergoes a third screening), the passenger simply goes to their cabin on the cruise ship, and their baggage is already prepared. Furthermore, both the rail and cruise companies benefit from a streamlined process that uses only one CT scan at the airport. The message may be sent directly from the SSA 16 on behalf of the travel operator, or the baggage status, including the baggage authentication manifest 33, may be obtained through a secure application programming interface (API) request. In this way, cruise companies, railway companies, and airlines can directly integrate this information into their mobile apps. As shown in Figure 7, passengers are notified of the status of their baggage, but in this case, direct delivery to the passenger's cruise ship cabin is not permitted. Therefore, passengers are notified that their baggage will be sent to Terminal B at the cruise ship port for screening.

[0047] Examples of hardware and software infrastructure

[0048] This invention can be implemented on various platforms. The following provides a preliminary basis for information technology that may be used to realize this invention.

[0049] Embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. Embodiments of the present invention can also be implemented as instructions stored in a machine-readable medium that can be read and executed by one or more processors. The machine-readable medium can include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a format readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device). Examples of machine-readable media include read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory devices, and electrical, optical, acoustic, or other propagating signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.). Furthermore, this specification may describe firmware, software, routines, and instructions as performing certain operations. However, such descriptions are for convenience only, and it should be understood that in practice, such operations are produced by computing devices, processors, controllers, or other devices that execute the firmware, software, routines, instructions, etc.

[0050] Machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, apparatus, devices, or any appropriate combination thereof. More specific examples (non-exclusive list) of computer-readable storage media include: electrical connections with one or more wires, portable computer floppy disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fibers, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or appropriate combinations thereof. In this document, computer-readable storage media means non-temporary, tangible media capable of holding or storing programs used by or in connection with instruction execution systems, apparatus, or devices. Storage and services may reside on-premises or in remote environments such as the “cloud” (through vendors operating under brand names such as MICROSOFT AZURE, AMAZON WEB SERVICES, RACKSPACE, KAMATERA, etc.).

[0051] A machine-readable signaling medium may include propagated data signals in which machine-readable program code is embodied, for example, as part of a baseband or carrier wave. Such propagated signals can take various forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic, optical, or appropriate combinations thereof. A machine-readable signaling medium is not a computer-readable storage medium, but any machine-readable medium capable of transmitting, propagating, or transporting programs used by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. However, as stated above, due to the limitations of the statutory subject matter scope of circuits, the claims of the present invention as a software product are embodied in non-temporary software media such as computer hard drives, flash RAM, and optical discs.

[0052] Program code embodied in a machine-readable medium can be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to wireless, wired, fiber optic cables, and radio frequencies, or any suitable combination of the former. Machine-readable program code for performing operations according to aspects of the present invention can be written in any combination of object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, C#, C++, and Visual Basic, and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as the "C" programming language. Additional languages ​​may include scripting languages ​​such as Python®, Lua, and Perl.

[0053] Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products. It will be understood that each block in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, as well as combinations of blocks within the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by machine-readable program instructions.

[0054] Glossary

[0055] Authorized personnel: Individuals who have been granted access to stored baggage images for the purpose of re-analysis in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to their respective means of transport.

[0056] Automated image analysis algorithm: A computer program designed to analyze and evaluate images, such as scanned baggage images, based on specific criteria related to the rules and regulations of different modes of transport.

[0057] Baggage: Luggage such as suitcases, backpacks, cargo containers, or other personal items that travelers carry with them during their trip.

[0058] A Baggage Source Message (BSM) is an electronic messaging standard used in the aviation industry to transmit basic information about checked baggage between airline systems and airport automated baggage handling systems. A BSM includes specific details such as passenger name, flight details (including departure and arrival airports, flight number, and date), baggage tag number, and planned route information. This structured data is used to accurately sort baggage and guide it to the appropriate aircraft, ensuring it reaches its correct destination or connecting flight if necessary. The functionality of BSMs is crucial in minimizing baggage loss and misdelivery.

[0059] Graphical User Interface: A visual interface for users, such as authorized personnel, to interact with computer systems and software. This includes viewing, annotating, and flagging images of luggage.

[0060] Imaging system: Devices or equipment used to take images of baggage during the screening process, such as X-ray machines, computed tomography (CT) scanners, and other imaging technologies.

[0061] Itinerary: A detailed plan or schedule of the traveler's journey, including information on flights, accommodations, and other means of transportation.

[0062] License Plate: A unique identifier or barcode affixed to each piece of baggage during baggage check-in. Also known as a baggage tag or baggage label. This unique "license plate" contains important details such as a 10-digit unique identifier for baggage tracking, the passenger's flight number, and destination. Furthermore, it features a scannable barcode that can be scanned at various stages of the baggage handling process. This allows the baggage handling system to sort each piece of baggage onto the correct aircraft and to locate baggage in case of misdelivery or loss. Passengers keep a portion of this tag and use it as identification or a receipt for claim purposes. This concept reflects the license plate system for vehicles, where each plate is assigned a unique identifier that enables tracking.

[0063] Re-screening: A process to re-examine baggage that has been flagged as not complying with the rules and regulations of a particular mode of transport. This may include physical inspection and additional scans.

[0064] Rules and Regulations: Guidelines and requirements established by regulatory bodies and companies operating various modes of transportation, such as cruise ships, railways, and bus services, to ensure the safety and security of passengers and their belongings.

[0065] Secure cloud storage system: A remote data storage service that uses encryption and access control measures to protect the privacy and security of stored data, such as scanned baggage images.

[0066] Transportation Security Administration (TSA): A government agency responsible for the security of travelers and baggage at airports, ensuring the safety of passengers, crew, and aircraft.

[0067] The advantages listed above and those evident from the preceding description are achieved efficiently. Since it is possible to make certain modifications to the above configuration without departing from the scope of the invention, all matters included in the above description and those shown in the accompanying drawings are intended to be interpreted as illustrative rather than restrictive.

Claims

1. A method for streamlining baggage security screening, including: Upload a collection of baggage images, including images of the contents of baggage items, to a secure cloud storage system, where said baggage image collection uses computed tomography imaging; Using a scanner, scan the machine-readable baggage identification label of the baggage item for a baggage identification record, where the baggage identification record uniquely identifies the baggage item and associates passenger data related to a first means of transport; Estimate a screening manifest from the baggage identification record, wherein the screening manifest lists a second mode of transport, and the second mode of transport requires baggage screening based on rules and regulations specific to the second mode of transport, which are different from the rules and regulations relating to the first mode of transport; Accessing the baggage image collection associated with the baggage identification record; Re-analyzing the accessed baggage image collection, including images of the contents of the baggage items, in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport; Determining whether the content complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; The screening manifest includes creating a baggage authentication record that lists the security compliance results of the second means of transport; and, To provide an authorization or prohibition directive to a trusted custodian to use to authorize or prohibit the direct delivery of the baggage items from the first means of transport to the second means of transport, bypassing additional baggage screening. method.

2. In the method of claim 1, the baggage image collection comprises the Digital Imaging and Communication in Security (DICOS) standard, method.

3. The method of claim 1 further includes: Extract passenger records to obtain the travel plan of the owner of the baggage item. method.

4. In the method of claim 1, the first means of transport is an aircraft, and the second means of transport is different from an aircraft. method.

5. The method of claim 1 further includes: Affixing an adhesive label to the baggage item, wherein the adhesive label includes a symbol indicating either a positive security compliance result or a negative security compliance result. method.

6. The method of claim 1 further includes: In the re-analysis screening of the baggage image collection, provide information on why the negative security compliance result was returned. method.

7. The method of claim 1 further includes: During the aforementioned reanalysis screening, the baggage image collection is visually annotated, and objects that caused the negative security compliance result are highlighted. method.

8. The method of claim 1 further includes: Electronically transmit the message of the positive or negative security compliance result for the second means of transport to the owner of the baggage item. method.

9. The method of claim 8 further includes: In the message to the owner, provide an explanation selected from a standardized array of explanations. method.

10. The method of claim 1 further includes: Transmit an annotated image of the object that caused the negative security compliance result to the security screening agency associated with the second means of transport. method.

11. The method of claim 10 further includes: Encrypting the annotated image of the object that caused the aforementioned negative security compliance result using a public / private key pair, method.

12. The method of claim 11 further includes: To sign the encrypted annotated image of the object that caused the aforementioned negative security compliance result using a public / private key pair, method.

13. The method of claim 1 further includes: Scanning the baggage item using a computed tomography imaging system that exports images of the baggage item to the baggage image collection. method.

14. In the method of claim 1, the security compliance result is represented by at least one of an identification card attached to the baggage item and an electronic compliance result transmission. method.

15. The method of claim 1 further includes: Attaching an identification tag to the baggage item, where the identification tag represents an acceptable security compliance result. method.

16. The method of claim 1 further includes: Attaching an identification card containing information representing either the approval instruction or the prohibition instruction to the baggage item, method.

17. In the method of claim 16, if the identification document reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, the identification document includes an authorization instruction notifying a trusted custodian to deliver the baggage items directly to the second means of transport without additional security screening. method.

18. In the method of claim 17, if the identification document reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport, the identification document includes a prohibition notice informing the trusted custodian that the baggage item requires additional security screening at the storage location or the second means of transport. method.

19. In the method of claim 1, the baggage identification record is estimated from the license plate. method.

20. A system for streamlining baggage screening across multiple modes of transport, the system comprising: A secure cloud storage system for receiving and storing a baggage image collection of baggage item contents captured using a computed tomography imaging system, and associated machine-readable baggage identification records obtained from a passenger's baggage items, wherein the baggage image collection includes baggage identification records linked to the baggage image collection of a first means of transport, wherein The aforementioned secure cloud storage system further includes the following: Screening manifest data extracted from the baggage identification record, wherein the screening manifest lists a second mode of transport, and the second mode of transport requires baggage screening of the contents based on rules and regulations specific to the second mode of transport, which are different from the rules and regulations relating to the first mode of transport; Re-analysis screening data of the contents of the baggage image collection in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; Creating a baggage authentication record that lists whether the re-analyzed content of the baggage image collection complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second mode of transport identified in the screening manifest, and security compliance results for the second mode of transport in the screening manifest, wherein the security compliance results are represented by one or more identifications attached to the baggage item or electronic compliance result transmissions; and Identification data that transmits an approval or prohibition instruction used to authorize or prohibit the direct delivery of the baggage item from the first means of transport to the second means of transport by a trusted custodian, system.

21. In the system of claim 20, the identification data includes information representing either the approval instruction or the prohibition instruction, The aforementioned approval directive includes positive security compliance results, and the aforementioned prohibition directive includes negative security compliance results. system.

22. In the system of claim 21, if the identification data includes a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, the identification data includes an authorization instruction notifying the trusted custodian to deliver the baggage item directly to the second means of transport without additional security screening. system.

23. In the system of claim 22, if the identification data includes a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport, the identification data includes a prohibition instruction that notifies the trusted custodian that the baggage item requires additional security screening at the storage location or the second means of transport. system.

24. The system of claim 20 further comprises: The baggage item is equipped with an adhesive label application device for attaching an adhesive label, the adhesive label including a symbol indicating a positive or negative security compliance result. system.

25. In the system of claim 20, the reanalysis screening data includes information on why the negative compliance result was returned. system.

26. In the system of claim 20, the reanalysis screening data further includes visual annotations of the baggage image collection that highlight the objects that caused the negative security compliance result, system.

27. In the system of claim 20, the secure cloud storage system is further configured to send a notification to the owner of the baggage item regarding the negative security compliance result. system.

28. In the system of claim 27, the secure cloud storage system is further configured to provide in the notice to the owner of the baggage item a standardized explanation regarding the prohibition order or negative security compliance result, system.

29. In the system of claim 20, the first means of transport is an aircraft, and the second means of transport is different from an aircraft. system.

30. A non-temporary computer-readable medium for storing instructions, wherein, when executed by a processor, the instructions cause the processor to perform a method for streamlining baggage screening across multiple means of transport, the method including: Upload a baggage image collection to a secure cloud storage system, which includes images of the contents of baggage items approved for travel using a first mode of transport, wherein the baggage image collection uses a computed tomography imaging system; To generate a baggage identification record that uniquely identifies the baggage item and associated passenger data from the scanned machine-readable baggage identification of the baggage item; Estimate a screening manifest from the baggage identification record, wherein the screening manifest lists a second mode of transport, and the second mode of transport requires baggage screening based on rules and regulations specific to the second mode of transport, which are different from the rules and regulations relating to the first mode of transport; Accessing the baggage image collection, which includes the image of the content of the baggage item associated with the baggage identification record; Re-analyzing the contents of the baggage image collection in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; Determining whether the content of the re-analyzed baggage image collection complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second mode of transport identified in the screening manifest, and creating a baggage authentication record in the screening manifest listing the security compliance results of the second mode of transport, wherein the security compliance results are represented by at least one of an identification attached to the baggage item and an electronic data transmission; and Communicating an approval or prohibition instruction used to authorize or prohibit the direct delivery of the baggage items from the first means of transport to the second means of transport by a reliable custodian, Computer-readable media.

31. A non-temporary computer-readable medium according to claim 30, wherein if the identification reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, it notifies the trusted custodian to deliver the baggage item directly to the second means of transport without additional security screening; and if the identification reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport, it notifies the trusted custodian that the baggage item must be sent for additional security screening at a storage facility or a security facility of the second means of transport. Computer-readable media.

32. A method for streamlining baggage screening across multiple modes of transport, the method comprising: A secure cloud storage system receives a collection of baggage images of scanned baggage items using an image system, wherein the image system exports images of the contents of the baggage items to the baggage image collection of the baggage items being transported using a first means of transport; Identifying a second means of transport, wherein the second means of transport requires additional baggage screening for the baggage items under rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport, which are different from the rules and regulations applicable to the first means of transport; With respect to the second means of transport, re-analyze the images of the contents of the baggage image collection in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport; Determining whether the contents of the baggage item comply with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport, and creating a baggage authentication record listing the security compliance results for the second means of transport; and, Authorize or prohibit direct delivery of the baggage items from the first means of transport to the second means of transport by a trusted custodian, thereby allowing the trusted custodian to deliver the baggage items directly to the second means of transport without additional security screening if the baggage authentication record reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, while allowing the baggage items to be sent for additional security screening at the storage location or the second means of transport if the baggage authentication record reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport. method.

33. The method of claim 32 further includes: The Digital Imaging and Communication in Security (DICOS) standard shall be used for the aforementioned baggage image collection. method.

34. The method of claim 32 further includes: Extract the passenger name record (PNR) and obtain the travel plan of the owner of the baggage item. method.

35. The method of claim 32 further includes: Attaching an adhesive label to the baggage item, wherein the adhesive label includes a symbol indicating a positive or negative security compliance result. method.

36. The method of claim 35 further includes: To include information explaining the negative security compliance results returned from the re-analysis screening of the baggage image collection, method.

37. The method of claim 32 further includes: While reanalyzing the images of the content in the baggage image collection, visually annotate the baggage image collection to highlight the objects that caused the negative security compliance result. method.

38. The method of claim 32 further includes: Electronically transmit a message to the owner of the baggage item regarding the positive or negative security compliance result for the second mode of transport. method.

39. The method of claim 38 further includes: The message to the owner of the baggage item includes an explanation selected from a standardized set of explanations regarding the negative security compliance outcome. method.

40. The method of claim 37 further includes: Transferring the aforementioned annotated baggage image collection to the security screening agency in the second means of transport, method.

41. The method of claim 40 further includes: The aforementioned collection of annotated baggage images is encrypted using a public / private key pair. method.

42. In the method of claim 32, the first means of transport includes an aircraft, and the second means of transport is different from an aircraft. method.

43. A system for streamlining baggage screening across multiple modes of transport, managed by a second screening agency (SSA), the system comprising: A storage system for receiving and storing: 1) a baggage image collection including images of baggage contents obtained in accordance with rules and regulations permitting movement using the first means of transport; and 2) associated baggage identification records; A manifest estimated from the baggage identification record, which lists second means of transport that require baggage screening based on rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport, different from the rules and regulations applicable to the first means of transport; A visual interface for re-analyzing and screening the contents of the baggage image collection in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; and A baggage authentication record listing the security compliance results determined for the second means of transport of the manifest, wherein the baggage authentication record is transmitted to a trusted custodian, so that in response to a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, the trusted custodian delivers the baggage items directly from the first means of transport to the second means of transport without additional security screening, and in response to a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport, the baggage items are sent for the additional security screening in the second means of transport. system.

44. The system of claim 43 further includes an adhesive label applicator for attaching an adhesive label to the baggage item, wherein the adhesive label includes a symbol indicating a positive or negative security compliance result. system.

45. The system of claim 44 further includes including on the adhesive label information as to why the negative compliance result was returned in the reanalysis screening of the baggage image collection, system.

46. The system of claim 43 further includes visual annotations for visually annotating the baggage image collection during the reanalysis screening to highlight the objects that caused the negative security compliance result, system.

47. The system of claim 43 further includes a notification to inform the owner of the baggage item of a negative security compliance result with respect to the second means of transport, system.

48. The system of claim 47 further includes, in the notification to the owner of the baggage item, a standardized explanation relating to the negative security compliance result, system.

49. In the system of claim 43, the first means of transport includes an aircraft, and the second means of transport is different from an aircraft. system.

50. A non-temporary computer-readable medium for storing instructions, wherein, when executed by at least one processor, the instructions cause the at least one processor to perform a method for streamlining baggage screening across multiple means of transport, the method including: A secure cloud storage system receives a collection of baggage images of the contents of baggage items scanned using an image system, wherein the image system exports images of the contents of the baggage system to a collection of baggage images of the baggage items being transported using a first means of transport; Identifying a second means of transport, wherein the second means of transport requires additional baggage screening under rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport, which are different from the rules and regulations applicable to the first means of transport; Re-analyzing the contents of the baggage image collection in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport; Determining whether the content of the re-analyzed baggage image collection complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport, and creating a baggage authentication record listing the security compliance results for the second means of transport; and, Authorize or prohibit a trusted custodian from directly delivering the baggage items from the first means of transport to the second means of transport as indicated in the baggage authentication record, thereby allowing the trusted custodian to deliver the baggage items directly to the second means of transport without additional security screening if the baggage authentication record reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, while allowing the baggage items to be sent to a storage facility or directly to the second means of transport for additional security screening if the baggage authentication record reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport. Non-temporary computer-readable media.

51. A method for streamlining baggage screening across multiple modes of transport, the method comprising: The first security agency (FSA) scans the baggage items using a computed tomography imaging system, which exports the contents of the baggage items to a baggage image collection; For a baggage identification record, the machine-readable baggage identification of the baggage item is scanned, where the machine-readable baggage identification is selected from a group consisting of a license plate identifier and a baggage source message (BSM) identifier, and the baggage identification record uniquely identifies the baggage item and associated passenger data; Upload the scanned baggage image collection and baggage identification records to a secure cloud storage system managed by a second screening agency (SSA), where the baggage image collection is linked to the baggage identification records; Estimate the screening manifest in the SSA from the baggage identification record, wherein the manifest lists at least one second means of transport that requires baggage screening under rules and regulations different from those applied by the FSA; With respect to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest, re-analyze the baggage images stored by the SSA in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport; Determine whether the re-analyzed baggage image complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest, and create a baggage authentication record in the screening manifest listing the security compliance results for the second means of transport, wherein the security compliance results are represented by at least one of an identification tag attached to the baggage and an electronic compliance result transmission; Authorization or prohibition of direct delivery of the baggage to the second means of transport indicated on the identification document by a trusted custodian, thereby allowing the trusted custodian to deliver the baggage directly to the second means of transport if the identification document reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, while allowing the baggage to be sent for physical security screening at the storage location or the second means of transport if the identification document reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport. method.

52. The method of claim 51 further includes: The aforementioned first security agency (FSA) shall use the Digital Imaging and Communication in Security (DICOS) standard for the baggage image collection. method.

53. The method of claim 51 further includes: The first security agency (FSA) extracts the passenger name record (PNR) from the baggage identification record and obtains the travel plan of the owner of the baggage. method.

54. The method of claim 51 further includes: In the secure cloud storage system managed by the second screening agency (SSA), a hash of the baggage identification record is generated, thereby preventing the details of the passenger from being known to the entity performing the re-analysis of the stored baggage images. method.

55. The method of claim 51 further includes: Attaching an adhesive label to the baggage, wherein the adhesive label includes a symbol indicating a positive or negative security compliance result. method.

56. The method of claim 51 further includes: The re-analysis screening of the stored baggage images includes information on why a negative compliance result was returned. method.

57. The method of claim 51 further includes: During the aforementioned reanalysis screening, the baggage image collection is visually annotated, and objects that caused negative compliance results are highlighted. method.

58. The method of claim 51 further includes: To electronically transmit a message indicating a positive or negative compliance result with the second mode of transport to the owner of the baggage. method.

59. The method of claim 58 further includes: The message to the owner of the baggage includes an explanation selected from a standardized set of explanations regarding the negative compliance outcome. method.

60. The method of claim 51 further includes: Transferring the annotated image of the object that caused the negative compliance result to the security screening facility in the second transport means, method.

61. The method of claim 60 further includes: The second screening agency (SSA) encrypts the annotated image of the object that caused the negative compliance result using a public / private key pair. method.

62. The method of claim 61 further includes: The Second Screening Authority (SSA) signs the encrypted annotated image of the object that caused the negative compliance result using a public / private key pair. method.

63. A system for streamlining baggage screening across multiple modes of transport, managed by a second screening agency (SSA), the system comprising: A secure cloud storage system for receiving and storing baggage items, baggage image collections, and associated machine-readable baggage identification certificates for baggage identification records, wherein the machine-readable baggage identification certificates are selected from a group consisting of license plate identifiers and BSMs, the baggage items and the machine-readable baggage identification certificates are scanned by a first security authority (FSA), and the baggage image collections are linked to the baggage identification records; A manifest generation module that estimates a screening manifest from the baggage identification record, wherein the manifest lists at least one second means of transport that requires baggage screening under rules and regulations different from those applied by the FSA; A reanalysis module for re-analyzing the stored baggage images in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; A compliance determination module that determines whether the re-analyzed baggage image complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest, and creates a baggage authentication record in the screening manifest listing the security compliance results for the second means of transport, wherein the security compliance results are represented by at least one of an identification card attached to the baggage and an electronic compliance result transmission; and, An identification module that communicates the security compliance result to a trusted custodian, wherein if the identification reports a positive security compliance result to the second means of transport, the trusted custodian may deliver the baggage directly to the second means of transport without additional physical security screening; and if the identification reports a negative security compliance result to the second means of transport, the baggage is sent for physical security screening at the second means of transport. system.

64. The system according to claim 63 further comprises an adhesive label applicator for attaching an adhesive label to the baggage, wherein the adhesive label includes a symbol indicating a positive or negative security compliance result. system.

65. The system of claim 63 further comprises an information-containing module that includes information about why a negative compliance result was returned in the reanalysis screening of the stored baggage images. system.

66. The system of claim 63 further comprises a visual annotation module that visually annotates the baggage image collection during the reanalysis screening and highlights the objects that caused the negative compliance result. system.

67. The system according to claim 63 further comprises a notification module that notifies the owner of the baggage of the negative compliance result with the second transport mode. system.

68. The system of claim 68 further comprises a standardized explanation generation unit that includes a standardized explanation of the negative compliance result in the notification to the owner of the baggage, system.

69. The system according to claim 13 further comprises an image transfer module that transfers an annotated image of the object that caused the negative compliance result to a security screening facility in the second transport means. system.

70. A non-temporary computer-readable medium for storing instructions, wherein, when executed by at least one processor, the instructions cause the at least one processor to perform a method for streamlining baggage screening across multiple transport modes, the method including: Scanning baggage items using a computed tomography imaging system, wherein the computed tomography imaging system exports the contents of the baggage items to a baggage image collection; For a baggage identification record, scan at least one of the machine-readable license plate identifier and the machine-readable BSM of the baggage item, wherein the baggage identification record uniquely identifies the baggage item and associated passenger data; Uploading the scanned baggage image collection and the baggage identification records to a secure cloud storage system; Estimate a screening manifest from the baggage identification record, wherein the manifest lists at least one second means of transport that requires baggage screening under rules and regulations different from those applied by the first security agency (FSA); Re-analyzing the stored baggage images in accordance with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest; Determining whether the re-analyzed baggage image complies with the rules and regulations specific to the second means of transport identified in the screening manifest, and creating a baggage authentication record that lists the security compliance results for the second means of transport within the screening manifest, wherein the security compliance results are represented by at least one of an identification tag attached to the baggage and an electronic data transmission; and, Authorization or prohibition of direct delivery of the baggage to the second means of transport indicated on the identification document by a trusted custodian, wherein if the identification document reports a positive security compliance result for the second means of transport, the trusted custodian may deliver the baggage directly to the second means of transport without additional physical security screening; on the other hand, if the identification document reports a negative security compliance result for the second means of transport, the baggage may be sent for physical security screening at the storage facility or sent directly to the second means of transport. Non-temporary computer-readable media.

Images