Determination of rotated concrete volume

Abstract

A method for determining the volume of a concrete mix load in a mixer drum is disclosed based on the use of an in-and-out sensor probe that dips into and exits the concrete during drum rotation and provides data to a processor that is used to calculate the volume based on the data. To account for concave, convex, and / or cascading surface flow effects that may interfere with accurate determination of the concrete load volume, the processor can be configured to compare the original batch volume and / or rheology of the concrete load monitored during drum rotation. Calibration of the load volume value, which is highly useful for monitoring or admixture dosing purposes, can be performed based on a comparison of real-time data with historical data collected over time and stored in processor-accessible memory. Furthermore, exemplary embodiments also take into account the speed and / or inclination of the drum (due to road conditions), concrete mix design, and other factors.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of concrete rheology measurement, and more particularly to a system and process that considers the effects of non-Newtonian fluid surface flow anomalies, such as convex, concave, and / or cascades, when determining concrete volume using an entry / exit probe inside a rotating mixer drum. [Background technology]

[0002] It is known to use a probe attached to the inside surface of a concrete mixer drum to determine the rheological properties as well as the volume of concrete mix contained within the rotating mixer drum.

[0003] In U.S. Patent No. 5,233,245 to IBBRheologie Inc., Beaupre et al. disclosed a probe attached to the inner wall of a rotating mixer drum, submerged in concrete by the rotation of the drum, and having a resistance member for sensing the pressure exerted by the concrete as it moved through the concrete. The rheological properties were reflected by the resistance in the concrete sensed by the probe at low and high speeds.

[0004] In Patent Document 2 (owned by GCP Applied Technologies Inc.), Berman taught that a computer processor unit can be programmed to rotate a sensor and record a first time interval during which the sensor is immersed in the concrete mix in the drum while rotating, and record a second time interval during which the sensor is not immersed, thereby allowing the volume of concrete to be calculated based on an analysis of the first and second intervals. Based on the calculated concrete volume, the amount of liquid to be added to the concrete to achieve desired rheological properties can be calculated. (See, for example, column 4, line 49 to column 5, line 14 of Patent Document 2.)

[0005] In U.S. Patent No. 5,629,999 (owned by GCP Applied Technologies Inc.), Berman disclosed a sensor that took into account additional forces exerted on the sensor by the concrete mix, i.e., by the lateral action of mixing fins attached to the wall of the rotating drum. This improvement was premised on the volume determination process described in the aforementioned U.S. Patent No. 5,629,999. The process involved recording the angle at which the sensor probe was immersed in the concrete in the rotating drum, recording the angle at which the sensor emerged from the concrete mix, and calculating the slump of the concrete by analyzing the "immersion angle" and "emergence angle" using a conversion table or mathematical function. See, e.g., column 5, line 32 to column 6, line 2.

[0006] In U.S. Patent No. 5,929,239, Biesak et al. disclosed a system for detecting the volume and / or viscosity of concrete slurry contained in a rotating drum. The sensors are mounted on the inner drum wall and may include acoustic transducers, accelerometers, and pressure sensors to enable a signal processor to determine the angular position and entry and exit points for the concrete load. It was noted that low-viscosity concrete slurries remain horizontal within the drum, while high-viscosity concrete slurries can "slide up the wall" such that (when viewing the drum in a cross-sectional perspective view) there is a "slope" in the horizontal level of the concrete. The amount of slope was said to depend on the viscosity of the concrete and the rotational speed of the drum (see, e.g., p. 11, lines 19-24 and Figure 5).

[0007] Therefore, it has been assumed up until now that accurate volume determination of a concrete load is accomplished by recording the entry and exit points of a probe into and from the concrete mix contained in a rotating mixer drum. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0008] [Patent Document 1] U.S. Patent No. 9,199,391 [Patent Document 2] U.S. Patent No. 9,625,891 [Patent Document 3] U.S. Patent No. 10,041,928 [Patent Document 4] International Publication No. 2019 / 040562 Brochure Summary of the Invention

[0009] Departing from the assumptions of the prior art, the present inventors believe that for a concrete slurry load contained in a rotating drum, determining the entry and exit points of an electromechanical sensor probe does not guarantee the accuracy of the calculated volume of the concrete load contained in the rotating drum.

[0010] The inventors have recognized that viscous concrete mixes at elevated drum rotation speeds may exhibit surface flow phenomena that may deceive system processors used to calculate the volume and / or viscosity of the concrete load based on the rotational entry and exit points of sensor probes mounted inside the rotating concrete mixer drum.

[0011] Various concepts used to explain the present invention are illustrated with reference to FIGS.

[0012] 1 and 2 are cross-sectional views along the axis of rotation of a concrete mixer drum 10, in which a sensor probe 14, shown in communication (16) with a processor 18, rotates in and out of a concrete load (shown at 12 and 22, respectively). A "low viscosity" concrete 12 is shown in FIG. 1, and a "high viscosity" concrete 22 is shown in FIG. 2. According to a general concept, the surface flow of a load of concrete 22, which has a higher viscosity (FIG. 2), will exhibit an angular direction compared to the low viscosity concrete 12 (FIG. 1) due to the "wall shear effect" as shown in FIG. 2.

[0013] However, FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary phenomenon in which the entry / exit points of the probe 14 mounted inside the rotating mixer drum 10 may be similar to those in FIG. 2, except that the flow surface of the concrete 32 is concave when viewed along a cross-sectional perspective view of the mixer drum 10. This concavity is due to the higher viscosity of the concrete "riding" against the drum wall (in the direction of rotation) as well as particle interactions of the aggregate (e.g., sand, stone) within the concrete mix 32. Depending on the degree or nature of the viscosity, the degree of concavity (or change from curvature compared to horizontal concrete) may be different at various drum speeds. Thus, the system processor used to calculate the volume of concrete based on signals received from the probe at the rotational entry and exit points may "consider" the volume of the concrete 32 shown in FIG. 3 to be the same as the volume of the concrete 22 shown in FIG. 2. We note here that in some circumstances, a convex surface may also be displayed, which may affect volume calculations based on in-and-out sensor points.

[0014] The occurrence of the cascade effect demonstrates that at some point concrete begins to exhibit flow behavior that is a combination of non-Newtonian fluids and granular materials, and the surface flow behavior is similar to that of a slurry. The mixer drum is affected by the movement of granular particles within the mixer drum. The inventors believe that such complex behavior needs to be taken into account during volume calculations based on the probe's entry / exit points. While a mild cascade effect may not prevent a concrete delivery truck driver from accurately calculating the volume of a concrete load by maintaining a low mixer drum speed (e.g., 1 RPM), problems arise when construction site pressures force the driver to move forward while mixing and pouring the concrete. There are many reasons why a truck driver might rotate the mixer drum at a faster speed: for example, the need to rotate the drum a minimum number of times before the load can be poured; the desire to mix in water and / or chemical admixtures so the concrete load can be poured; the need to pour the concrete early so that construction workers are not waiting around the construction site for the concrete to be poured (leveled); or the desire to return quickly to the batch plant for the next delivery due to the end of the work shift.

[0015] 4 is an illustration of a concrete load 42 being subjected to a rotational speed of the mixer drum 10 where cascading effects in the surface flow of the concrete 10 when viewed in a cross-sectional perspective view can increasingly hinder accurate determination of the concrete load volume. As shown in FIG. 4, the extreme "S" curve shape of the concrete 42 can become highly asymmetric in nature, the center of the "S" shape can shift relative to the probe entry and exit points; or the probe entry and exit points can change non-uniformly relative to the entry and exit points at lower drum speeds.

[0016] Again, the inventors believe that calculating concrete load volume based solely on the probe entry and exit points may be inaccurate, given that at the intersection of concrete load viscosity and low mixer drum speeds (anywhere above 1-3 RPM), various surface flow anomalies may begin to occur.

[0017] To detect the effects of excessive concave, convex, and / or cascading surface flow that may interfere with accurate calculation of concrete load volume based on ingress-exit sensor probe data, the inventors contemplate comparing the in-and-out data generated by the probe (e.g., based on ingress and egress points, or probe immersion and non-immersion intervals) with in-and-out probe data previously obtained from a concrete load having the same rheology. Using a processor, the in-and-out signal data of the current concrete load can be compared to historical data, accounting for two or more factors, which can be used in calculating the current load volume and / or to adjust (calibrate or recalibrate) process factors by which the volume values ​​are obtained.

[0018] Thus, the present invention provides a process and system for determining and / or calibrating concrete load volume calculations based on the use of in-and-out sensor probes in a rotating concrete mixer drum. For example, current in-and-out data and slump values ​​can be compared using a processor to stored in-and-out data and slump values ​​to provide a volume value associated with the concrete before any portion of the load was discharged (e.g., the original load volume value contained in the batch ticket, etc.).

[0019] An exemplary method for determining the volume of concrete includes the steps of: (A) rotating a concrete load contained within a mixer drum having an interior wall, a non-vertical rotation axis, and at least one sensor probe mounted on or along the interior wall and configured to receive in-and-out signal data as it rotates through the concrete load using (i) immersion and non-immersion intervals of the probe, or (ii) approach and exit angles of the probe, and transmit in-and-out signal data to a processor configured to receive the in-and-out signal data and calculate a value corresponding to the volume of the concrete load; (B) the processor (e.g., (C) performing a volume value calculation by accessing a database storing concrete load volume values ​​associated with in-and-out signal data previously acquired from the sensor probe (e.g., at various drum rotation speeds, preferably at various drum rotation speeds); and (D) performing, based on the volume value calculation, at least one function selected from: (i) dispensing a dose of water or admixtures into the concrete load; (ii) discharging a quantity of concrete from the mixer drum; (iii) providing an indication of the dosed dose, the volume of concrete discharged, or both (e.g., a delivery ticket indicating the delivered concrete volume, the amount of chemical admixtures dispensed into the concrete); and (iv) any combination of the foregoing functions.

[0020] In further exemplary embodiments, the processor preferably takes into account other factors, in addition to different rotational speeds of the mixer drum, such as rheology (e.g., slump, slump flow), slope angle of the concrete load (which a delivery truck may experience while traveling up and down a sloped surface), concrete mix design (e.g., cement content), mixer drum design, or any combination thereof.

[0021] An exemplary system of the present invention includes at least one sensor probe in communication with a processor programmed to perform the exemplary methods described above.

[0022] Further advantages and features of the present invention are described in more detail below.

[0023] An appreciation of the advantages and features of the present invention may be more readily appreciated by considering the following description of exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the drawings. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0024] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view of a rotating concrete mixer drum showing a low viscosity concrete load. [Figure 2]1 is a cross-sectional perspective view of a rotating concrete mixer drum showing a high viscosity concrete load exhibiting the "climbing up the wall" effect. [Figure 3] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view of an exemplary phenomenon in which a concrete load in a rotating mixer drum begins to exhibit concave surface flow at high viscosity and / or high drum rotation speeds. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is another cross-sectional perspective view showing the cascade of surface flow of the concrete load within the rotating mixer drum at high viscosity and / or high drum rotation speeds. [Figure 5] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view of the results of solving the equations of Example 1, assuming Newtonian fluid behavior at low viscosity and low drum speed. [Figure 6] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view showing the results of solving the equations of Example 1, assuming Newtonian fluid behavior at low viscosity and moderate drum speed. [Figure 7] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view showing the results of solving the equations of Example 1, assuming Newtonian fluid behavior with high viscosity and moderate drum speed (surface flow displays an "S" shaped phenomenon). [Figure 8] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view showing the results of solving the equations of Example 1, assuming Newtonian fluid behavior with high viscosity and moderate drum speed (surface flow exhibiting a concave shape). [Figure 9] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional perspective view showing the results of solving the equations of Example 1, assuming Newtonian fluid behavior with high viscosity and moderate drum speed (surface flow exhibiting a convex shape). [Figure 10] 1 is a graph showing the relationship between predicted and measured volumes for 97 comparative measurements where the predictions are based solely on in-and-out sensor measurements, without consideration of rheology (e.g., slump). [Figure 11] 10 is a graph showing the combined relationship between predicted and measured volumes for 97 comparative measurements, where the linear prediction is based on in-and-out sensor measurements for three different cement contents. [Figure 12]1 is a graph showing predicted volume versus measured volume for 97 comparative measurements, where the linear prediction is based on in-and-out sensor measurements and slump for three different cement contents. [Figure 13] 1 is a graph showing the relationship between predicted volume and measured volume for 97 comparative measurements where the linear prediction is based on in-and-out sensor measurements for three different cement contents, slump, and the tilt of the delivery truck along the axis of rotation of the mixer drum. [Figure 14] 1 is a graph showing predicted versus measured volume for 97 comparative measurements, where predictions are derived from a linear regression analysis incorporating both linear and quadratic terms based on in-and-out sensor probe measurements for three different cement contents, slump, and the tilt of the delivery truck along the mixer's axis of rotation. [Figure 15] 1 is a graph showing predicted volume versus measured volume for 97 comparative measurements, where predictions are obtained from a random forest regression analysis based on in-and-out sensor probe measurements for three different cement contents, slump, and the tilt of the delivery truck along the mixer's axis of rotation. [Figure 16] 1 is a histogram showing an exemplary distribution of potential calibration volumes for over 700,000 concrete loads. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0025] The term "concrete" as used herein may be understood to include ready-mix concrete. Typically, concrete comprises a hydratable cement or cementitious binder (e.g., ordinary Portland cement, optionally containing auxiliary cementitious materials such as granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, limestone, and / or natural pozzolans) combined with aggregates (e.g., sand, stone), water (in an amount sufficient to produce a flowable or pumpable slurry), and one or more optional chemical admixtures (e.g., cement dispersants, such as water reducers called plasticizers or superplasticizers, set accelerators, set retarders, corrosion inhibitors (for use with metal rebar), strength enhancers, etc.).

[0026] The concept of mixer "drum" can cover stationary or mobile batch mixers in concrete batching plants, or more preferably, rotary mixer drums with a non-vertical rotation axis, such as those found in ready-mix concrete delivery trucks. Examples of concrete mixer drums (e.g., in ready-mix concrete trucks) that rotate axially at a (non-vertical) angle are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 10,183,418 to Jorden et al. (see, e.g., Figure 1) and U.S. Pat. No. 10,041,928 to Berman (also see Figure 1), both of which are owned by the common assignee herein. Such mixer drums typically have at least one blade or fin attached to the inner wall of the drum and arranged helically around the rotation axis, such that rotation of the drum in one direction forces concrete components toward the closed end of the drum (mixing or loading mode), and rotation in the opposite direction discharges material through the open end of the drum (pouring mode).

[0027] Exemplary sensor probes contemplated for use in the present invention can include force-type probes (e.g., stress or strain gauges, load cells), acoustic transducer-type probes, or other electromechanical types mounted within the drum cavity. Preferably, the sensor probes are mounted on the interior wall of the drum, and more preferably, on a removable hatch lid or door on the inner drum wall. For example, U.S. Patent No. 10,041,928 to Berman shows a force-type sensor probe powered by solar panel means and mounted on a hatch door accessible from the outside of the mixer (see, e.g., FIG. 1). Other force-type probes have been previously described in the Background Art section (see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 9,199,391 to Beaupre et al. and U.S. Patent No. 9,625,891 to Berman). Acoustic transducer-type probes can also be mounted on the back. This has been previously described in the technical section (see, for example, Biesak et al., International Publication No. 2019 / 040562).

[0028] A preferred sensor probe may be an on / off electrical or electronic contact switch that closes an electrical circuit (i.e., is turned "on") upon entry of the probe into the concrete and disconnects (i.e., is turned "off") upon exit of the probe from the concrete. Such a design can be much simpler than the elongated and complex probe structures taught in the aforementioned patents to Beaupre et al., Berthold Berman, and Biesak et al. For example, when using a slump monitoring system that relies on hydraulic sensing, it is not necessary to use force or acoustic type sensors to determine the slump of a concrete load.

[0029] A suitable sensor must be capable of distinguishing between submerged and non-submerged states with respect to concrete, and more preferably with respect to water or slurry, such as "grey water," at the bottom of a mixer drum. "Grey water" is a term sometimes used to refer to residual or returned concrete slurry, which may or may not be diluted with water and / or retarder. For example, when a sensor contacts grey water, the resulting output must be distinguishable from the output when the sensor is not in contact with grey water. Thus, a binary signal is suitable for determining contact with water, slurry, or other materials at the bottom of a mixer drum. When immersed in grey water, sensors based on electrical resistivity exhibit a significant decrease in resistivity because grey water is a conductive medium. Sensors based on electrical permittivity exhibit an increase in dielectric properties as the sensor comes into contact with grey water. Furthermore, a sensor designed to measure turbidity will measure a significant increase in turbidity when the sensor comes into contact with grey water. Thus, suitable sensors can utilize electrical resistance (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,665), electrical permittivity (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,438,480), microwaves (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,104,584), nuclear resonance (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 2,999,381), infrared waves (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,727,608), sound waves (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,033,321), light scattering (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,324,304 and 4,263,511), or fluid (i.e., concrete) pressure head change (see, e.g., WO 2019 / 040562). From the signal, the submersion rate or inverse rate can be calculated in several ways. The disclosures of the aforementioned patents are incorporated herein by reference. It is contemplated that multiple sensors can be used to increase the accuracy of the measurement or to provide redundancy in case a single sensor fails. If the redundant sensor fails, the system may detect the malfunction and switch to the alternate sensor or may warn of the malfunction. These sensors [46 and 48] may be mounted, for example, on the hatch [8] in the arrangement shown in Figure 7.The example sensors

[46] and

[48] shown in Figure 7 may be the same type of sensor or may be different. If different types of sensors are used, they may be spaced apart to minimize the effect of the sensors on each other's measurements. For example, if the sensors measure different physical phenomena and there is no interference, they may be spaced closer together. Furthermore, such sensors may be powered by different means, such as batteries (which may be rechargeable) or solar panels, or a combination of both.

[0030] In a first exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides a method for calibrating a volume of concrete, the method comprising: (A) an interior wall; a non-vertical rotation axis; and at least one probe mounted on or along the interior wall and configured to transmit in-and-out signal data as it rotates through the concrete load using (i) immersion and non-immersion intervals of the probe, or (ii) approach and exit angles of the probe, to a processor configured to receive the in-and-out signal data and calculate a value corresponding to the volume of the concrete load. (B) a processor accessing a database storing concrete load volume values ​​correlated with in-and-out signal data previously acquired from the sensor probes (e.g., preferably at various drum rotation speeds) to perform a volume value calculation; and (C) based on the volume value calculation, performing at least one function selected from: (i) administering a dose of water or admixture to the concrete load; (ii) discharging a quantity of concrete from the mixer drum; (iii) providing an indication of the administered dose, the volume of the discharged concrete, or both (e.g., a delivery ticket indicating the delivered concrete volume, the amount of chemical admixtures added to the concrete), and (iv) any combination of the foregoing functions.

[0031] Preferably, the sensor is mounted on or along the inner wall of the mixer drum, which preferably has at least one blade or fin mounted on the inner wall in a helical arrangement about the axis of rotation of the mixer drum.

[0032] In a first aspect of the first exemplary embodiment, the sensor probe is a contact or pressure switch that can sense the electricity (conductivity) or pressure of the concrete. For example, it may be a contact switch, an acoustic transducer, or a combination thereof that closes an electrical circuit (turns "on") when immersed in a concrete load and opens an electrical circuit (turns "off" or disconnects) when not immersed in a concrete load. In a more preferred aspect, the contact or pressure switch is effective for measuring the presence of water or diluted slurry at the bottom of the mixer drum, and this type of sensor probe may be used to measure "gray water," which is the remaining or returned concrete.

[0033] In a second aspect of this first exemplary embodiment, the sensor probe may be force-type, with sensors based on the use of strain or stress gauges or load cells to measure force on the probe, which is rotated through the concrete load. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 9,199,391 to Beaupre; see also U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,858,061 and 9,625,891 to Berman.) Such force-type probes may further be used to monitor the slump of the concrete load.

[0034] In a third aspect of the first exemplary embodiment, two or more sensor probes can be attached to or along the inner drum wall, or two or more sensors can be housed within the same probe body, to detect forces in two or more directions. For example, in U.S. Patent No. 1,004,1928, Berman disclosed a sensor probe device capable of detecting concrete flow in two different directions. One sensor can detect concrete flow in one direction (such as the direction of drum rotation), while another sensor can detect concrete being pushed in a second direction by the force of a mixing blade that was moving the concrete as the drum rotated.

[0035] In a fourth aspect of the first exemplary embodiment, the sensor probe may be an acoustic transducer that generates a signal that reflects or indicates a state of immersion in or emergence from the concrete (see, for example, WO 2019 / 040562 to Biesak et al.).

[0036] In a second exemplary embodiment that may be based on the above first exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides a method in which, in step (A), calculating a volume value of the concrete load contained in the mixer drum includes adjusting a concrete load volume value included in a batch ticket issued by the batch plant. The adjusted volume may then be printed on a delivery ticket, for example, after the concrete has been poured at a building site.

[0037] In a first aspect of this second exemplary embodiment, the concrete load volume value is adjusted as a result of, or as part of, the operation of calculating the current concrete load volume value. A value corresponding to the delivered concrete (e.g., the volume discharged from the drum at the building site) may be printed on a delivery ticket, which can be transmitted electronically or provided to the customer in hard copy format, thereby verifying the actual volume of concrete delivered to the building site.

[0038] In a third exemplary embodiment, which may be based on either the first or second exemplary embodiments above, the present invention includes the steps of monitoring at least one of the rheology of a concrete load contained in a rotating mixer drum, the tilt angle of the rotating mixer drum, or both, and performing a volume value calculation by accessing a database storing concrete load volume values ​​correlated with in-and-out signal data previously acquired from the sensor probe, preferably at various drum rotation speeds, at various rheological conditions, and at various mixer drum tilt angles.

[0039] In a further aspect of this third exemplary embodiment, the monitored rheological properties may include slump, slump flow, yield stress, or other rheological properties as taught in the patent literature, as referred to herein. The drum tilt angle may be monitored using one or more accelerometers, such as one mounted on the rotating drum (e.g., housed next to or as part of the sensor probe), one mounted on the concrete delivery truck frame, or both the drum and truck frame. For example, an accelerometer may be installed with or as part of the sensor probe on the mixer drum hatch. Preferably, a triaxial accelerometer is used on the sensor probe, as this can enable detection of the sensor probe approach and exit angles relative to the concrete, along the drum rotation axis, and can enable detection of any drum angle, as well as the fore-and-aft "tilt" of the entire delivery truck to which the mixer drum is attached.

[0040] In a fourth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the first through third exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method in which a rotatable concrete mixer drum is mounted on a ready-mix concrete delivery truck. In a first aspect of this fourth embodiment, the preferred truck-mounted mixer drum has a concrete load capacity of at least 8 cubic yards and at least two blades arranged helically about an axis of rotation, the axis of rotation of the drum preferably being at an angle of 5 to 75 degrees relative to the horizontal, more preferably at an angle of 10 to 55 degrees relative to the horizontal.

[0041] In a fifth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to fourth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method, in which a slump of a current concrete load in a mixer drum is monitored by an automatic slump monitoring system, and the slump value is derived using a force sensor, a hydraulic pressure sensor, or a combination thereof.

[0042] In a first aspect of this example, a sensor probe with a stress gauge can be used to monitor the slump or other rheological properties of a concrete load over time. For example, U.S. Patent No. 9,625,891 to Berman disclosed that pressure sensors can be used to measure and control the slump of concrete by monitoring sensors in a concrete mixer.

[0043] In a second embodiment of this example, the oil pressure sensor is located at each of the "fill" and "discharge" ports of the hydraulic motor associated with the rotation of the mixer drum. An automatic slump monitoring system based on monitoring hydraulic pressure is provided. A concrete monitoring system based on hydraulic pressure sensing and drum speed sensing is available under the trade name VERIFI™ from GCP Applied Technologies Inc. and / or its affiliate, Verifi LLC, 62 Whittemore Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Such systems and their potential performance capabilities are variously described in the patent literature. See, for example, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,473; 8,020,431; 8,764,954; 8,989,905; 8,727,604; also U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,272; 8,960,990; 8,818,561; 8,311,678; 9,789,629; 8,491,717; 8,764,273; 9,466,203; 9,550,312; and 9,952,246.

[0044] In a sixth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the first through fifth exemplary embodiments described above, the present invention provides a method in which at least one sensor probe is a contact switch. Note that an exemplary aspect of this sixth exemplary embodiment may include using a contact switch that opens or closes a circuit when sufficient pressure or force is applied to the switch. While a contact switch can be considered a basic type of "force" sensor, the purpose of a contact switch is not to measure force or pressure so much as to indicate the appearance or non-immersion of the probe in the concrete. Thus, the volume of the concrete may be obtained by comparing the interval between immersion and non-immersion in the concrete or by determining the angle of entry and exit of the probe (such as when an accelerometer is used in combination with the sensor probe). In a further aspect of this exemplary embodiment, the switch may be used in conjunction with a gyroscope and / or accelerometer installed as a modular unit on the drum hatch door. A combination of a gyroscope and an accelerometer, taught for detecting the rotational speed of a concrete mixer drum, is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 9,952,246 to Jordan et al., owned by Verifi LLC.

[0045] In a seventh exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the first through sixth exemplary embodiments above, the present invention provides a method further including the steps of: providing at least one hydraulic pressure sensor for monitoring the pressure required to rotate a concrete mixer drum at a given drum speed and obtaining an indication of the slump, slump flow, or other rheological property of a current concrete load in the mixer drum; using the at least one sensor probe to generate in-and-out data for the current concrete load contained in the mixer drum for calculating a volumetric value for a given drum speed; and comparing the indication of the slump, slump flow, or other rheological property of the current concrete load based on the hydraulic pressure and drum speed with stored historical signal data in which the in-and-out data correlates with the calculated slump, slump flow, or other rheological property (preferably at various drum speeds).

[0046] In an eighth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the first through seventh exemplary embodiments above, the present invention provides a method, wherein at least one sensor probe comprises a force probe and a contact switch, both mounted on a mixer drum hatch door. In a first aspect of this exemplary embodiment, the use of both the force probe and the contact switch provides in-and-out signal data to the same processor, which can be compared to determine whether the force probe may have inaccuracies due to variations in the length of the force probe and the actual location on the concrete surface where the force probe enters and exits.

[0047] A ninth exemplary embodiment may be based on any of the first to eighth exemplary embodiments. In one embodiment, the invention provides a method in which in-and-out probe signal data obtained from a current concrete load contained in a rotating mixer drum is used by a processor only after either (i) a predetermined amount of mixer drum rotations (e.g., 5, 20, or perhaps 40 rotations) have occurred, or (ii) an automated slump monitoring system has confirmed that the concrete load has reached homogeneity or uniformity. In a first aspect of this example, the current in-and-out sensor probe signal data obtained from the current concrete load is then collated by the processor, and in option (i), the signal data is compared to previous in-and-out sensor probe signal data stored in processor-accessible memory only after (i) a predetermined amount of mixer drum rotations (e.g., 5, 20, or perhaps 40 rotations) have occurred, and in option (ii), the signal data from the sensor probe is compared to previous in-and-out sensor probe signal data stored in processor-accessible memory only after the automated slump monitoring system has confirmed that the concrete load has achieved homogeneity or uniformity.

[0048] In a tenth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to ninth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method, further including acquiring an in-and-out sensor probe signal including data sets of a probe entry point, a probe exit point, a mixer drum rotation speed, and a slump value, and further wherein the processor compares these data sets from a current concrete load in the mixer drum with historical data of past concrete loads, also with respect to the probe entry point, the probe exit point, the mixer drum rotation speed, and the slump value.

[0049] In a first aspect of the tenth exemplary embodiment, both the mixer drum tilt angle and concrete mix design number (e.g., typically assigned by the batch plant where the concrete mix was provided) associated with the current load are compared with in-and-out signal data and historical in-and-out probe signal data (previously stored prior to the current delivery) that also include historical tilt angle and mix design number as factors to be considered by the processor in determining the volume value of the concrete (or adjusting the volume value as provided in the batch ticket).

[0050] In an eleventh exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to tenth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method, further including acquiring in-and-out sensor probe data signals including data sets including a probe entry point, a probe exit point, a mixer drum rotation speed, and a slump, wherein a processor compares these data sets obtained from a current concrete load in the mixer drum with stored data of past concrete loads, and the processor further compares a mix design number and a tilt angle of the current concrete load with the stored data of the past concrete loads.

[0051] In a twelfth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first through eleventh exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method in which a processor selects historical in-and-out sensor probe data stored in memory based on mixer drum type. In other words, the processor is programmed to compare data generated using the same mixer drum type. This can be done, for example, by storing probe data for a given concrete delivery in a memory location or by employing an acquisition tag that allows the processor to only include data obtained using drums from the same manufacturer or a specific model in volume calculations when comparing current data with historical data.

[0052] In a thirteenth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to twelfth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method for controlling a mixing operation of a mixing device, comprising: In addition to the speed, the processor further monitors the slump and tilt angle of the concrete load contained in the mixer drum, and performs calculations for calculating the volume value by accessing a database that stores values ​​of concrete load volume correlated with in-and-out signal data previously obtained from the sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and mixer drum tilt angles, and the processor is further configured to store data in the database for the monitored in-and-out signal data, mixer drum rotation speed, slump, tilt angle, and calculated value of concrete load volume.

[0053] In a first aspect of the above thirteenth exemplary embodiment, the stored value of the concrete load volume, which correlates with the in-and-out signal data obtained from the previous concrete delivery, is obtained from a batch ticket issued in association with the concrete load component (if a portion of the load was not discharged from the mixer drum prior to storing the load volume value in a memory location (e.g., accessible in the cloud, at a remote processor location, or in slump monitoring processor memory)).

[0054] In a fourteenth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to thirteenth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a mixer drum comprising: a processor monitoring in-and-out signal data and a mixer drum rotation speed, as well as a slump and tilt angle of a concrete load contained in the mixer drum; and performing calculation of a volume value by accessing a database storing values ​​of concrete load volume correlated with previously acquired in-and-out signal data from the sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and mixer drum tilt angles; and the processor calculating a volume value by using the monitored in-and-out signal data, the mixer drum rotation speed, and a database storing values ​​of concrete load volume correlated with previously acquired in-and-out signal data from the sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and mixer drum tilt angles. and storing data in a database for the calculated drum rotation speed, slump, tilt angle, and concrete load volume, wherein the drum rotation speed is within the range of 1 to 16 revolutions per minute (RPM), more preferably 1 to 22 revolutions per minute, and the slump is within the range of 0.5 to 10 inches or the slump flow is within the range of 10 to 20 inches, and the drum tilt angle is a change of -10 degrees to +10 degrees as measured when the drum (having an initially non-vertical rotation angle) is tilted, such as by a delivery truck traveling along an uphill or downhill road.

[0055] In a fifteenth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the above first to fourteenth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a system comprising at least one sensor probe in communication with a processor programmed to perform the method of claim 1. For example, the one or more sensor probes are wirelessly connected to a processor located on the delivery truck (outside the mixer drum), on the mixer drum hatch door, inside the truck compartment, or on the truck frame, or at a remote location such as a dispatch or control center (see Figures 3 and 4).

[0056] In a sixteenth exemplary embodiment, which may be based on any of the first through fourteenth exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method or system in which a processor is programmed to determine a concrete load volume value after each of at least two different discharge events from the same concrete load. The inventors believe that, until the present invention, there has been no accurate method using a sensor probe to measure volume values ​​after successive discharge events from the same mixer drum load. In a further aspect based on this example, the method further includes issuing a delivery ticket for each volumetric portion discharge from the original load volume in the mixer drum (which can typically be loaded up to a maximum volume of 12 cubic yards).

[0057] A seventeenth example that can be based on any of the above first to sixteenth exemplary embodiments. In exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides methods and / or systems including a processor configured to perform any of the methods described in the above exemplary embodiments, the processor wirelessly connected to at least one sensor probe selected from a force sensor, a contact switch, an acoustic transducer, or a combination thereof. For example, the force sensor can be of the type disclosed in any of U.S. Pat. No. 9,199,391 (Beaupre et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 9,625,891 (Berman), U.S. Pat. No. 10,041,928 (Berman), or WO 2019 / 040562 (Biesak et al.). A preferred combination can include a force sensor and a contact switch, and more preferably, both of these types of sensors can be mounted on the same frame or structure within the drum hatch or drum.

[0058] While the present invention has been described herein using a limited number of exemplary embodiments, these specific embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as otherwise described and claimed herein. Modifications and variations from the described embodiments exist. More specifically, the following examples are given as specific illustrations of embodiments of the claimed invention. It is understood that the invention is not limited to the specific details set forth in the examples. All objects and percentages in the examples and the remainder of the specification are by weight unless otherwise specified.

[0059] Furthermore, any range of numbers recited in the specification or claims, such as those representing a particular set of properties, units of measurement, conditions, physical states, or percentages, is intended to literally and explicitly incorporate herein by reference or otherwise any number encompassed within such range, including any subset of numbers within any such recited range. For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R, and an upper limit, R, is disclosed, any number, R, falling within that range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following number, R, within the range is specifically disclosed: R = R + k * (RU - R), where k is a variable ranging from 1% to 100% in 1% increments, e.g., k is 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, ... 50%, 51%, 52%, ... 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%. Furthermore, any numerical range represented by any two values, R, calculated above, is also specifically disclosed. [Example]

[0060] [Example 1] To explain the influence of various parameters on the concrete surface profile inside the rotating drum, we have constructed a simplified model based on Zik et al. (1994), where the surface of the granular material is described by the following equation:

number

[0061] The above equations can be solved numerically to generate surfaces with different parameters at different filling values ​​(e.g., 50% full). In the first example, k=1, ρ=2400 kg / m 3 ;g=9.81m / s 2 ; η = 1.0 Pa-s; p0 = 2400 Pa; ω = 1 rpm; μ = 0.2, R = 1.1 m, and the surface at x = 0 is 0 (corresponding to 50% area filling). The condition that the surface (y) = 0 at x = 0 provides the initial condition for solving the differential equation. These parameters roughly approximate the low-viscosity concrete inside a slowly rotating drum. As shown in Figure 5, the concrete surface (dark solid line) and dotted lines indicate the area near the inner wall of the drum where the sensor detects entrance and exit. The error in area measurement based on the perceived surface (determined by the sensor) and the actual surface was calculated.

[0062] Thus, in Figure 5, the low viscosity concrete and slowly rotating drum (shown here rotating in a counterclockwise direction) result in a relatively flat surface flow profile, as expected, and the area measurement error is zero, as both lines overlap.

[0063] However, as the speed of the mixer drum increases, the concrete flow surface becomes steeper, as shown in Figure 6. Because the viscosity (e.g., slump) of the concrete is still relatively low, the surface flow is still relatively flat, but the dotted line in Figure 6, which represents a straight line between the entrance and exit points of the probe in the concrete, is slightly or barely visible.

[0064] As viscosity increases, the shape begins to become nonlinear, as shown in Figure 7. In all three cases shown in Figures 5-7, the deviation from linearity was relatively uniform on both sides of the dotted line, resulting in negligible volumetric measurement error. In other words, a positive error on one side of the drum is offset by a negative error on the other side, resulting in negligible error.

[0065] [Example 2] Theoretical consideration of the graphical results further confirms that concrete mixes can exhibit flow behavior closer to that of granular materials than that of Newtonian fluids (e.g., shear stress in fluids is linearly proportional to strain rate). The equations in Example 1 were numerically solved with k=0.5, representing a shear-thinning material. Concrete is widely known as a shear-thinning material (e.g., viscosity decreases with increasing shear strain). Furthermore, the internal friction of materials is not constant within concrete. In particular, internal friction decreases when the material is already moving (i.e., static vs. kinetic coefficient of friction). In the case of a cascade surface, the material is already moving at the bottom of the drum (x<0).

[0066] As shown in Figure 8, the kinetic friction coefficient remained at 0.2 while the static friction coefficient increased to 0.9. In other words, if the concrete is not moving, it takes more force to move it compared to when the concrete is already moving. The relationship between friction coefficients is material dependent. The changes to the model suggest that asymmetric convex flow can occur, introducing substantial errors into concrete volume calculations based solely on entry and exit points.

[0067] [Example 3] This example confirms that highly asymmetric effects in the surface flow of a concrete load in a rotating mixer drum can be amplified when the concrete fill level does not exceed 50% of the mixer drum capacity. To model this case, the initial conditions of the differential equation are adjusted to be x=0 and surface (y)=-0.25 (i.e., less than 0), as shown in Figure 9. This suggests that the volume calculation of the concrete load contained in the drum can be in error by as much as 10%. In other words, for a 10 cubic meter hard concrete load, a system processor programmed to calculate the volume based on the probe's entry and exit points can be off by as much as 1 cubic yard of concrete. There is a gender.

[0068] Based on these examples, the inventors believe that several factors can affect the shape of the concrete flow surface such that the volume of the concrete load actually contained within the rotating drum can deviate significantly from the theoretical volume (see the dotted lines corresponding to the entrance and exit points in Figure 8). If the error were constant, there would be little cause for concern. However, the inventors have recognized that the error can vary in nature and extent from one mix design to another; from truck to truck; from one drum speed to another; and from concrete volume to concrete volume.

[0069] The inventors further believe that if one were to use an empirical method to calibrate volume determinations based on, for example, 10 different concrete mix designs, at four different rheology levels (e.g., different slumps), at four different volume levels, using three mixer trucks, and using only one concrete manufacturer, one would have to make 480 (e.g., 10 x 4 x 4 x 3 = 480) different standard measurements for only one concrete manufacturer.

[0070] Therefore, in the present exemplary method and system, the inventors prefer to calibrate their load volume determinations using data collected over time. In other words, this involves using a processor to collect data including the immersion state of the sensor probe and other potentially relevant factors such as rheology (e.g., slump), concrete mix design, and the original or actual starting volume of the concrete load (as originally batched and placed in a ready-mix delivery truck at the batching plant). Preferably, this data collection occurs before the concrete is removed from the drum to establish an initial data set for a typical drum load.

[0071] [Examples 4 to 9] For Examples 4-9, data was collected using a ready-mix concrete delivery truck and a force sensor attached to the interior wall of the mixer drum. This data was analyzed to determine the volume and the accuracy with which it was determined. Twenty-five concrete loads were generated at various load size volumes (e.g., 2, 4, 7, and 10 cubic yards), yielding 97 data points. For each load, the immersion / non-immersion ratio (i.e., the percentage of the drum rotation in which the sensor was immersed) was recorded from the force sensor. Additionally, the truck inclination (the angle of the drum's axis of rotation relative to the horizontal or level ground), cement content (i.e., concrete mix design), concrete slump, and air content of the concrete load were recorded.

[0072] The initial volume was based on the initial batch report from the concrete batching plant. Subsequent volume determinations of the concrete were made by measuring the volume of concrete discharged from the concrete mixer drum into a wheelbarrow of known volume.

[0073] Tests were carried out on wheelbarrows of concrete to determine relevant parameters such as slump and air content according to the respective ASTM methods.

[0074] The tilt of the truck (along the axis of rotation of the mixer drum) was determined using an inclinometer on the truck, but may also be determined using an accelerometer (preferably of the triaxial type) mounted on the rotating drum.

[0075] [Example 4] As shown graphically in Figure 10, the relative accuracy of concrete volume determinations made using the probe-detected immersed / unimmersed ratio data can be seen by comparing the data with measured volume numbers. The predictions were evaluated by [means of]. A linear regression analysis was performed using the immersed / unimmersed (in-out) ratio as the predictor variable. Only linear terms were considered (e.g., the in-out ratio, but not the square of the in-out ratio). The measured volume numbers were obtained according to batch equipment where the material was accurately weighed. The percentage of predictions within 0.25 cubic yards of the actual volume measurement was determined to be approximately 32% in this example. Therefore, in this dataset, approximately 68% of predictions based solely on the in-out ratio do not meet the sufficient accuracy required by standards such as ASTM C1792-14. In other words, the in-out ratio was not deemed sufficient by the inventors to develop a robust model for 25 loads, so the inventors considered other factors. Cross-validation scores were determined by standard cross-validation of the regression method using a "K-fold" of 5. In other words, the dataset was divided into five groups, with each group serving as a validation set based on models created from the other four groups. The inventors determined that predictions within each load size group (e.g., 2, 4, 7, 10 cubic yards) were inaccurate due to complex flow conditions within the concrete created by several factors (e.g., concrete slump, concrete truck inclination (i.e., angle between the mixer drum's axis of rotation and the horizontal), air content, cement content, etc.). The inventors also realized that these inaccuracies occurred even at drum speeds as low as 2 RPM (revolutions per minute), which are all too frequently encountered in industry. The solid line represents the equivalence line (i.e., predicted values ​​are equal to measured values).

[0076] [Example 5] In this example, the inventors considered that the center of the flowable mass (e.g., Examples 1-3) may vary depending on the rheology of the material, and that the amount of cement in the concrete mix may have a nonlinear effect on the rheological behavior. As illustrated by the data shown graphically in Figure 11, the inventors performed linear regression analysis using the ingress / egress data (reflected as the ratio of immersed to unimmersed) for each of three different cement content groups (e.g., 423, 611, and 752 pounds per cubic yard (pcy)). Within each group, linear regression analysis was performed as in Example 4. Figure 11 shows the combined measured volume versus predicted volume with each linear model. As shown in Figure 11, the cross-validation score improved by 23.5 percentage points, but the inventors considered that the model could be improved in terms of accuracy.

[0077] [Example 6] In this example, we performed linear regression analyses that included the in-and-out ratio and concrete slump (measured according to ASTM C143 / 143M-15a) as predictors for three different cement contents. They also included an interaction term (i.e., between slump and in-and-out ratio). In this case, we found that the cross-validation score improved by an additional 7.1 percentage points, as shown in Figure 12. We believed that the overall accuracy could be further improved.

[0078] [Example 7] In this example, we considered that truck tilt (along the mixer drum's axis of rotation) could adversely affect volume determination. In this example, we performed a linear regression including in-and-out ratio, slump, and slope within each cement content group as predictor variables. Slope was obtained using an inclinometer mounted on the truck frame (rather than the mixer drum). An interaction term was also included. For this particular dataset, we found that the slope factor provided an additional 17.5 percentage point increase in the cross-validation score; this can be visually understood by referring to FIG. 13.

[0079] [Example 8] In this example, we applied a model using quadratic and cubic terms, including interaction terms for the same parameters as in Example 7 (e.g., in-and-out ratio, slump, and slope for each cement group). The results for the cubic model are shown in Figure 14. While the predicted points are close to the line, the cross-validation score is reduced by 23.4 percentage points, indicating overfitting of the data. While this type of prediction is relatively good for this exact data set, it is possible that the prediction will be less accurate when new data is encountered (e.g., a new load of concrete with slightly different slump, slope, etc.). We found a similar effect when modeling predictions using quadratic factors.

[0080] [Example 9] We used the same parameters as predictors along with the interaction terms in the following examples, except we applied a random forest regression machine learning method. Random forest regression is an ensemble learning method that works by constructing multiple decision trees (500 in this case) and outputting the average prediction of each individual tree. The decision trees were restricted to a maximum depth of three decisions to reduce the possibility of overfitting. The cross-validation score in this case was over 95% and is shown in Figure 16. We confirmed the idea that if only the in-and-out ratio were used, the cross-validation score would drop to below 89%, as shown in Figure 15. Therefore, we believe that including regression analysis and related parameters (e.g., slump, slope) in the analytical model may improve the accuracy of volume prediction.

[0081] [Example 10] The inventors provide the histogram in Figure 16 to suggest potential usable volume calibration data that can be obtained as illustrated by the exemplary method described above. While the majority of concrete load volumes are approximately 9-10 cubic yards, the inventors believe that meaningful data can be obtained for a variety of load sizes. Over time, more data will be generated and therefore available for use in calibration methods such as the example described above.

[0082] The foregoing examples and embodiments are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. 1. A method for determining the volume of a concrete load, comprising: (A) rotating the concrete load contained within a mixer drum having an interior wall, a non-vertical rotation axis, and at least one sensor probe mounted on or along the interior wall and configured to transmit in-and-out signal data as it rotates through the concrete load using (i) probe immersion and non-immersion intervals or (ii) probe approach and exit angles to a processor configured to receive the in-and-out signal data and calculate a value corresponding to the volume of the concrete load; (B) the processor accessing a database containing concrete load volume values ​​correlated with previously acquired in-and-out signal data from the sensor probe to perform volume value calculations; (C) performing, based on the volumetric value calculation, at least one function selected from: (i) dispensing a dose of water or admixtures into the concrete load; (ii) discharging a quantity of concrete from the mixer drum; (iii) providing an indication of the dispensed dose, the volume of discharged concrete, or both; and (iv) any combination of the foregoing functions. Including, further comprising the steps of monitoring at least one of the rheology of the concrete load contained in the rotating mixer drum, the tilt angle of the rotating mixer drum, or both, and performing the calculation of the volume value by accessing a database containing stored concrete load volume values ​​correlated with in-and-out signal data previously acquired from a sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and various mixer drum tilt angles. method.

2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (A), the calculation of the volume value of the concrete load contained in the mixer drum includes adjusting a concrete load volume value included in a batch ticket issued by a batch plant.

3. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the rotatable concrete mixer drum is mounted on a ready-mix concrete delivery truck.

4. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the slump of the current concrete load in the mixer drum is monitored by an automatic slump monitoring system, and the slump value is derived using a force sensor, a hydraulic pressure sensor, or a combination thereof.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor probe is a contact switch.

6. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: providing at least one hydraulic pressure sensor to monitor the pressure required to rotate the concrete mixer drum at a given drum speed and obtain an indication of the slump, slump flow, or other rheological property of the current concrete load in the mixer drum; using the at least one sensor probe to generate in-and-out data for the current concrete load contained in the mixer drum to calculate a volumetric value for a given drum speed; and comparing the indication of the slump, slump flow, or other rheological property of the current concrete load based on hydraulic pressure and drum speed to historical signal data in which in-and-out data is stored correlating with slump, slump flow, or other rheological property calculated at various drum speeds.

7. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor probe comprises a force probe and a contact switch, both of which are mounted on a mixer drum hatch door.

8. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein in-and-out probe signal data obtained from the current concrete load contained in the rotating mixer drum is used by the processor only after (i) a predetermined amount of mixer drum rotation has occurred, or (ii) an automatic slump monitoring system has confirmed that the concrete load has reached homogeneity or uniformity.

9. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising acquiring an in-and-out sensor probe signal including data sets of a probe entry point, a probe exit point, a mixer drum rotation speed, and a slump value, and further wherein the processor compares these data sets from a current concrete load in the mixer drum with historical data from past concrete loads.

10. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising acquiring an in-and-out sensor probe data signal including data sets including a probe entry point, a probe exit point, a mixer drum rotational speed, and a slump, wherein the processor compares these data sets obtained from a current concrete load in the mixer drum with stored data from past concrete loads, and wherein the processor further compares a mix design number and a tilt angle of the current concrete load with the stored data from past concrete loads.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the processor selects historical in-and-out sensor probe data stored in memory based on mixer drum type.

12. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring the slump and tilt angle of the concrete load contained in the mixer drum; and performing the volume value calculation by accessing a database storing concrete load volume values ​​correlated with in-and-out signal data previously obtained from a sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and various mixer drum tilt angles, wherein the processor is further configured to store data in the database for the monitored in-and-out signal data, mixer drum rotation speed, slump, tilt angle, and calculated concrete load volume values.

13. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: monitoring a slump and tilt angle of the concrete load contained in the mixer drum; and performing the volume value calculation by accessing a database storing concrete load volume values ​​correlated with in-and-out signal data previously obtained from a sensor probe at various drum rotation speeds, various rheological conditions, and mixer drum tilt angles; wherein the processor is further configured to store data in the database for the monitored in-and-out signal data, mixer drum rotation speed, slump, tilt angle, and calculated concrete load volume; and wherein the drum rotation speed is within a range of 1 to 16 revolutions per minute (RPM); and wherein the slump is within a range of 0.5 to 10 inches or the slump flow is within a range of 10 to 20 inches; and the drum tilt angle varies from (-) 10 degrees to (+) 10 degrees as measured when the drum is tilted by a delivery truck traveling along an uphill or downhill road.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the drum rotation speed is in the range of 1 to 22 revolutions per minute.

15. 10. A system comprising at least one sensor probe in communication with a processor programmed to perform the method of claim 1.

Images