Metal-doped activated carbon

Abstract

A composition incorporating activated carbon, an electro-stabilizing agent and / or a wettability enhancing agent. Methods of producing conductive activated carbon including a step of combining activated carbon with an electro-stabilizing agent and / or a wettability enhancing agent to form an activated carbon mixture; and exposing the activated carbon mixture to a sweeping gas at an elevated temperature. The electro-stabilizing agent can be copper. The wettability enhancing agent can be aluminum.

Description

[0041] Throughout the following description specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding to persons skilled in the art. However, well known elements may not have been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the disclosure. Accordingly, the description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.

[0042] In one example embodiment, the inventors have developed a novel process for producing carbon having desirable physical properties. Such carbon has potential utility, for example, to manufacture electrodes for use in energy storage, for example in supercapacitors, metal-sulphur batteries, lithium-sulphur batteries, and so on. The inventors have determined that doping activated carbon with metals that can serve as a wettability enhancing agent and an electro-stabilizing agent can improve the conductivity and / or physical properties of the activated carbon, particularly after the activated carbon has been treated to reduce the number of functional groups present.

[0043] In particular tested example embodiments, lignin A (LA), lignin B (LB), and black liquor (BL, which contains dissolved lignin in alkaline solution) were used to produce ligninbased activated carbons, using potassium hydroxide (KOH) as an exemplary oxidizing agent. Lignin-based activated carbons were treated with a sweeping gas (SG) treatment using a reducing gas for the removal of oxygen-containing functional groups. YP50F (YPAC, derived from coconut shell) was selected as a comparative type of biologically based renewable source activated carbon.

[0044] The metal-doped activated carbons tested in the examples were observed to show significantly improved adsorptive capability and electrical properties resulting in high capacitance values in the tested supercapacitor applications. The metal-doped activated carbons are suitable for electrode materials in supercapacitors and battery applications such as metal-sulphur including lithium-sulphur batteries.

[0045] As used herein a renewable source of activated carbon refers to a source of carbon that can replenish itself naturally (e.g. that is derived from a biologically based source such as lignin or coconut), as opposed to a non-renewable source of activated carbon such as coal or oil by-products.

[0046] As used herein, lignin refers to both lignin A, lignin B, and black liquor. Lignin A and B are kraft lignin with a low ash (< 2% by mass) and high ash (< 25% by mass), respectively. Pulp and paper biosolids (also called “activated sludge”) that remain after biogas digestion is another feedstock that contains a high level of lignin. In preparing biogas, the biodegradable biosolids convert to biogas through digestion and then non-degradable parts are left. The major component of the non-degradable parts is lignin. A high-lignin feedstock refers to a material that contains a significant proportion of lignin (e.g. between 65% and 98% or higher lignin dry matter content, including any subrange therebetween e.g. at least 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or greater than 98% lignin dry matter content by weight), or from black liquor obtained from a pulping process (which typically contains between 10-15% lignin in its wet matter content, including any value therebetween including 11, 12, 13 or 14% lignin by weight, and which may contain at least 20-35% or higher recoverable lignin by weight in its dry matter content including any subrange therebetween e.g. at least 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, 30%, 31%, 32%, 33%, 34% or 35% recoverable lignin by weight on a dry matter basis). In some embodiments, the high-lignin feedstock has a recoverable lignin content of between 65% and 98% or higher by weight on a dry basis, including any subrange therebetween e.g. at least 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or greater than 98% recoverable lignin by weight on a dry basis).

[0047] In one example embodiment, activated carbon is ground and mixed with a dissolved salt of an electro-stabilizing agent and / or a dissolved salt of a wettability enhancing agent. The resulting preparation is dried, leaving the metal salts physically embedded in the activated carbon. The dried carbon is subjected to a sweeping gas treatment to remove oxygen from the material and convert the metal salt to its oxide form and / or elemental form, leaving the metal doped in the carbon. The electro-stabilizing agent may help to improve capacitance values by providing high capacitance at a fast discharge. The wettability enhancing agent may improve the interactions of the activated carbon with solvents and electrolytes.

[0048] More specifically and without being bound by theory, typical activated carbon contains a high number of oxygen-containing functional groups which have favourable interactions with polar solvents. The oxygen is chemically bound to the activated carbon and results in high electrical resistance when used as an electrode material. A sweeping gas treatment conducted as described herein using an anoxic gas or under reducing conditions can be used to reduce (and thereby remove) oxygen-based functional groups from the activated carbon, resulting in an increase in the carbon content of the activated carbon. The oxygen-stripped activated carbon becomes highly non-interactive with polar solvents, including the polar solvents that are used as electrolytes in supercapacitors and lithium sulphur batteries.

[0049] Most high-performance supercapacitors contain an organic electrolyte. For example, the electrolyte can contain a conductive salt (e.g. tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate or TEABF4) which is dissolved in an acetonitrile solvent (a polar solvent). The activated carbon produced through the sweeping gas process described herein (i.e. a highly pure carbon with a minimum amount of oxygen-based functional groups) is highly non-interactive with polar solvents. The wettability (interaction) is poor between the electrolyte and the non-polar surface of the activated carbon. The poor wettability creates less ion-mobility of TEABF4 in activated carbon-based electrodes resulting in a poor internal resistance (or ionic impedance or diffusion resistance which is different from electrical resistance) of the activated carbon-based supercapacitors. Without being bound by theory, addition of a wettability enhancing agent, such as doping the activated carbon with aluminum or other suitable wettability enhancing agent, can improve the ion mobility of the electrolyte (e.g. by improving ionic interactions between the electrode and the electrolyte).

[0050] Without being bound by theory, it is believed that activated carbon that is doped with a metal oxide, a metal or a metal complex as described herein will provide a high capacitance with low internal resistance for supercapacitors, and will minimize the migration of lithium polysulphides and subsequent deposition of insoluble lithium sulfide into the anode of the lithium sulphur battery. Additionally, it was observed that metal doping reduces the amount of a solvent required when the activated carbon slurry is coated on an aluminum foil for forming the electrode of a supercapacitor, and improves the coating properties of the activated carbon slurry is on an aluminium foil.

[0051] In some embodiments, the electrical stabilizing agent and / or the wettability enhancing agent are non-combustible.

[0052] The preparation of activated carbon using lignin or a high-lignin feedstock is described, for example, in PCT application No. PCT / CA2022 / 050218 filed 15 February 2022, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

[0053] With reference to FIG. 1, an example embodiment of a process 100 for preparing metal-doped activated carbon is illustrated. At 102, mixing is carried out to combine one or more electro-stabilizing agents and / or wettability enhancing agents with activated carbon as described further below. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing and / or wettability enhancing agent are provided as a solution, and the solution is mixed with the activated carbon and agitated for a period of time, e.g. V2 hour to 1 hour. In some aspects, mixing can be carried out to combine the substances using a ball mill or other suitable apparatus. In some aspects, micro-grinding can be carried out at 102. In some aspects, the combined substances are further milled after mixing using a planetary ball mill or other suitable apparatus for a period of time, e.g. Vt. hour to 1 hour. The mixed and / or ground / micro-ground substances can be further processed at 102 if desired. At 104, the mixture is dried. At 106, the mixture is subjected to a sweeping gas treatment, for example as described in PCT / CA2022 / 050218.

[0054] In one example embodiment, after drying at 104, at 106 the activated carbon is subjected to a sweeping gas process at elevated temperature. In some embodiments, the sweeping gas process is carried out using a reducing gas in combination with an inert gas. Examples of gas that may be used as a reducing gas include hydrogen, ammonia, carbon monoxide, forming gas, syngas, or the like. Forming gas is a mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen known in the art. Syngas is a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen known in the art. Examples of inert gas include nitrogen, helium and argon.

[0055] In some embodiments, the gas used to carry out the sweeping gas process contains between about 80% to about 98% inert gas, including any value or subrange therebetween e.g. 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 or 97% inert gas, and between about 2% to about 20% reducing gas, including any value or subrange therebetween e.g. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 or 18%. In some embodiments, the gas used to carry out the sweeping gas process contains between 90-96% inert gas and 4-10% reducing gas. In some embodiments, the sweeping gas contains 96% argon and 4% hydrogen.

[0056] In some embodiments, the activated carbon mixture is provided to the sweeping gas treatment as a thin layer of solids, for example spread on a tray. In some embodiments, the activated carbon mixture is held stationary during the sweeping gas treatment.

[0057] In some embodiments, the sweeping gas is applied at a flow rate of approximately 0.25 to 1L / minute in a 6” tube furnace at atmospheric pressure, including any value therebetween e.g. 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90 or 0.95 L / minute. The flow rate at which the sweeping gas is applied can be adjusted by one skilled in the art depending on the type of apparatus used to carry out the process. Step 106 can be carried out in any suitable apparatus, e.g. a tube furnace, rotary kiln, fluidized bed reactor or other suitable apparatus can be used in various embodiments.

[0058] In some embodiments, the sweeping gas is sprayed over or through the activated carbon material at step 106. In some embodiments, a sufficient amount of the sweeping gas is supplied to the activated carbon material so that there is a molar excess of hydrogen gas relative to the number of oxygen functional groups in the activated carbon. In some embodiments the sweeping gas has a superficial velocity relative to the surface of the activated carbon material of between about 0.25 cm / min and 7.0 cm / min, including any value therebetween e.g. 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.50, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.50, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.50, 4.75, 5.0, 5.25, 5.50, 5.75, 6.0, 6.25, 6.50 or 6.75 cm / min.

[0059] In some embodiments, the sweeping gas process at 106 is conducted at an elevated temperature, and the elevated temperature is a temperature in the range of between about 750°C and about 950°C, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 775, 800, 825, 850, 875, 900, 925 or 950°C. In some embodiments, the sweeping gas treatment is conducted for a period between about 0.5 hours and about 9 hours, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, or 8.5 hours.

[0060] In some embodiments, at 102, a suitable source of activated carbon is combined with an electro-stabilizing agent and / or a wettability enhancing agent. The activated carbon can be ground to a relatively small particle size. In some embodiments, the activated carbon is ground to a size in the range of about 1 pm to about 10 pm, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 pm. In one embodiment, the activated carbon is ground to a size in the range of about 1 pm to about 10 pm, with a mean size of 6 pm.

[0061] Any suitable form of activated carbon can be used in various embodiments. Suitable sources of activated carbon include carbonized biomass, including coconut, nutshells, lignin ora high-lignin feedstock, coal, peat, wood and the like, which can be converted to activated carbon in any desired manner.

[0062] In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is a conductive metal. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is a transition metal. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pb, Ag, La, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, or Ac. In some embodiments, the electrostabilizing agent is Cu. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is Ti, V, Ni, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn or Mo. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is a conductive metal. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is a metal that has 12 non-faradaic reactions in supercapacitors. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is copper (Cu) or nickel (Ni) which are commonly used as current collectors for supercapacitors. In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent is Cu. In some embodiments in which the electro-stabilizing agent is Fe, a level of Fe in an electrode fabricated using the activated carbon is less than 50 ppm.

[0063] In some embodiments, the wettability enhancing agent is aluminum. In some embodiments, the wettability enhancing agent is an aluminum oxide, e.g. AIO (aluminum (II) oxide) or AI2O3 (aluminum (III) oxide, i.e. alumina), activated alumina (Y-AI2O3), or any other compound that can provide better interactions between polar and non-polar substances.

[0064] In some embodiments, the electro-stabilizing agent and / or the wettability enhancing agent are supplied at 102 as a solution of a metal salt, e.g. a salt of the metal with chloride, hydroxide, nitrate, sulphate, or the like, e.g. copper nitrate, copper sulphate, aluminum nitrate, aluminum sulphate, or the like. In some embodiments, the metal salt is provided in an aqueous solution, or in solution with any acceptable solvent (e.g. water, methanol, ethanol, and / or any other polar solvents) at 102. In one example embodiment, the electrostabilizing agent is copper and the copper is supplied as copper sulphate (e.g. CUSO4 5H2O). In one example embodiment, the wettability enhancing agent is aluminum and the aluminum is supplied as aluminum nitrate (e.g. AI(NO3)3-9H2O).

[0065] In some embodiments, the amount of the electro-stabilizing agent that is combined with the activated carbon is in the range of about 0.5% to about 4.0% elemental content by weight in the finished product, including any value or subrange therebetween e.g. 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 or 3.9%. In some embodiments, the amount of the electro-stabilizing agent that is combined with the activated carbon is in the range of about 1% to about 3.5% elemental content by weight based on the elemental content of the metal, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1,2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 or 3.5%. In some embodiments, the amount of the electro-stabilizing agent that is combined with the activated carbon is less than about 4.0% by weight based in the elemental content of the metal, including e.g. less than about 3.9, 3.8, 3,7, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 2.9, 2.8, 2.7, 2.6, 2.5, 2.4, 2.3, 2.2, 2.1,2.0, 1.9, 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6 or 0.5 % by weight.

[0066] In some embodiments, the amount of the wettability enhancing agent supplied at 102 is in the range of about 0.15% to about 1.50% by weight based on the elemental content of the metal by weight in the finished product, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80,0.85,0.90,0.95, 1.0, 1.05, 1.10, 1.15, 1.20, 1.25, 1.30, 1.35, 1.40 or 1.45%. In some embodiments, the amount of the wettability enhancing agent supplied at 102 is in the range of about 0.45% to about 1.00% by weight based on the elemental content of the metal, including any value or subrange therebetween, e.g. 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, or 1.0%.

[0067] In some embodiments in which the activated carbon is produced from lignin, the electro-stabilizing agent is present in an amount of between about 2.75% and 3.25% by weight, including any value therebetween e.g. 2.80, 2.85, 2.90, 2.95, 3.0, 3.05, 3.10, 3.15 or 3.20% by weight, and the wettability enhancing agent is present in an amount of between about 0.50% and 1.25% by weight, including any value therebetween, e.g. 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1.0, 1.05, 1.10, 1.15 or 1.20% by weight.

[0068] In some embodiments in which the activated carbon is produced from coconut husk, the electro-stabilizing agent is present in an amount of between about 2.75% and 3.25% by weight, including any value therebetween e.g. 2.80, 2.85, 2.90, 2.95, 3.0, 3.05, 3.10, 3.15 or 3.20% by weight, and the wettability enhancing agent is present in an amount of between about 0.25% and 1.00% by weight, including any value therebetween, e.g. 0..30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, or 0.95% by weight.

[0069] In some embodiments, any other desired additives or components can be added at 102 in a similar manner as described for the electro-stabilizing agent and the wettability enhancing agent. For example, in some embodiments conductivity enhancing additives such as graphene, graphite or the like are added at 102 or after completion of sweeping gas treatment at 106.

[0070] In some embodiments, after the activated carbon has been combined with the metal salt, at 104 the resulting mixture is dried. Any suitable drying conditions can be used to carry out step 104, including ambient conditions. In some embodiments by way of example only, drying is carried out at a temperature in the range of about 70°C, e.g. between about 60°C and 80°C in a convection oven for a period of approximately 48 hours. In some embodiments, drying is carried out under atmospheric pressure. In some embodiments, drying is carried out under vacuum, e.g. at a pressure in the range of about 10 to about 760 mmHg, including any value therebetween e.g. 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700 or 750 mmHg. After drying, at 106 the mixture is subjected to a sweeping gas process at elevated temperature.

[0071] In one example embodiment, aluminum doping of activated carbon is carried out with aluminum acting as a wettability enhancing agent. An aluminum salt such as aluminum nitrate is converted to a thin layer of aluminum oxide on the surface of the activated carbon. The typical activated carbon as an electrode material is highly non-interactive with polar solvents that contain an organic electrolyte for supercapacitors and lithium sulphur batteries. Without being bound by theory, the activated carbon doped with aluminum oxide as described herein is believed to have interactive and adsorptive properties with polar substances resulting in improved capacitances at a fast discharge rate. The aluminum oxide content (which can be expressed as elemental aluminum content, e.g. the elemental content of the metal in the composition by weight) in the doped activated carbon can be optimized to provide a thin and conductive aluminum oxide layer.

[0072] More specifically and further without being bound by theory, it is believed that the final product of AI-O treated with sweeping gas from the aluminum, e.g. provided as aluminum nitrate, exists as an activated alumina form, and it is known that activated alumina is highly effective for adsorption of sulphur compounds, as well as being hydrophilic. It is further known that activated alumina is highly effective for adsorbing fluoride. In the examples described below, the electrolyte used in the supercapacitors contains fluoroborate ions (BF'4), which may explain the observed properties of these electrodes. The results described in the examples herein suggest that Al-doped and Al and Cu-doped activated carbon formed through the sweeping gas treatment may minimize the formation of lithium polysulphides in the anode side of lithium sulphur battery applications while providing improved capacitance.

[0073] Further without being bound by theory, it is believed that copper doped in activated carbon exists as a pure copper metal form which does not have any adsorbent and hydrophilic properties. The copper-doping provides activated carbon with improved conductivity. However, the electrode with copper doped at too high a concentration may reduce the capacitance of the supercapacitor because copper may block micro-pores on and in activated carbon. Therefore, moderate levels of an electro-stabilizing agent like copper may be beneficial.

[0074] In one example embodiment, copper doping of activated carbon is carried out with copper acting as the electro-stabilizing agent. A copper salt such as copper sulphate can be converted to metallic (i.e. elemental) copper to decrease the internal resistance of the supercapacitor while minimizing blockage of the micropores of the activated carbon by the elemental copper. The content of copper in the doped activated carbon can be expressed as elemental copper content, e.g. the elemental content of the copper in the composition by weight.

[0075] In one example embodiment, aluminum and copper doping of activated carbon is carried out, with aluminum acting as the wettability enhancing agent and copper acting as the electro-stabilizing agent.

[0076] In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has a carbon content of at least about 95%, including between about 90% and about 99%, including any value therebetween, e.g. 96, 97 or 98%.

[0077] In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has a BET surface area as determined using nitrogen gas adsorption of at least 2500 m2 / g, including at least 2600, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200 or 3300 m2 / g. In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has a pore volume measured using nitrogen gas adsorption of at least 0.8 cc / g, including at least 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1.00, 1.05, 1.10, 1.15 or 1.20 cc / g. In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has an iodine value of at least 2500 mg / g, including at least 2550, 2600, 2650, 2700, 2750, 2800, 2850, 2900, 2950, 3000, 3050, 3100, 3150 or 3200 mg / g. In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has a mean particle size of less than 15 pm without micronization, including e.g. less than 14, 13, 12, 11 or 10 pm without micronization, or has a mean particle size of less than 7 pm with micronization, including e.g. less than 6 or less than 7 pm with micronization. In some embodiments, the resulting activated carbon product has a bulk density of 0.25 g / cc or higher, including e.g. 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.29, 0.30, 0.31, 0.32, 0.33, 0.34, or 0.35 g / cc or higher.

[0078] In some embodiments, the activated carbon products described herein are incorporated into electrodes. FIG. 2 shows an example embodiment of a method 200 for fabricating an electrode using activated carbon. At 202, an activated carbon slurry is prepared using the activated carbon and a binder (e.g. PVF, polyvinylidenedifluoride) in a suitable solvent (e.g. N-methyl pyrrolidone, NMP). Optionally a conductivity enhancer such as graphite is added. At 204 the slurry is homogenized in any suitable manner, for example by sonication. At 206, the resultant slurry is coated on a suitable foil, e.g. aluminum foil, in any suitable manner (e.g. using a coating machine).

[0079] At 208, the electrodes are cut from the coated foil, and at 210 the electrodes are hot compressed using any suitable apparatus, e.g. a Carver lab press, e.g. by first heating the electrode to a suitable temperature such as 200°C and then compressing the electrode e.g. at 100 MPa. At 212, the electrodes are preconditioned, for example by placing at 150°C in a vacuum overnight. At 214, the electrodes are assembled, for example using an airtight button cell (e.g. CR2032 coin cells with a Swagelok) in an inert atmosphere, e.g. an argon-filled glove box. Two electrodes can be placed in the cell with a suitable separator positioned between them and the electrolyte (1.5 M of tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEABF4) dissolved in acetonitrile) can be added.

[0080] Other methods of fabricating electrodes are known to those skilled in the art and could be used in other embodiments, and the foregoing description provides guidance as to one exemplary method of fabricating electrodes and is not limiting.

[0081] With reference to FIG. 3, an example embodiment of process 300 for preparing an activated carbon cathode for a lithium-sulphur battery is illustrated. At 302, the activated carbon is mixed with aluminum, e.g. as aluminum nitrate (AI(NO3)3*9H2O) and copper, e.g. as copper sulphate (CuSO^FW). At 304, the combined material is dried, and at 306 the material is subjected to sweeping gas treatment as described above. Finally, at 308, the activated carbon is impregnated with sulphur, for example using liquid ammonia as described in PCT publication No. WO 2021 / 0248245, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, although any suitable method of impregnating the activated carbon could be used and other methods are known to those skilled in the art.

[0082] FIG. 4 shows an example embodiment of a process 400 for fabricating a cathode for a lithium-sulphur battery. The method illustrated in FIG. 4 is exemplary only and those skilled in the art can fabricate cathodes for lithium-sulphur batteries in any suitable manner. At 402, a carbon-sulphur composite paste is prepared using a binder (e.g. polyvinylidene difluoride) and a conductive agent (e.g. graphite) in a suitable solvent (e.g. N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone). The mixture is homogenized at 404 (e.g. by ultrasonication) and then at 406 is coated onto aluminum foil, e.g. using a doctor blade coating machine. At 408, the coated foil is dried and at 410 the coated foil is shaped as desired (e.g. cut to the desired shape) to form a cathode, which is compressed in any suitable manner at 412, e.g. using a Carver lab press. The cathode is combined with the lithium metal anode and the electrode is then assembled at 414 incorporating electrolyte (e.g. (1 M of lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiN(SO2CFs)2) and 1% lithium nitrate in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and 1,3-dioxolane (DOXL)).

[0083] In some embodiments, a lithium sulphur battery having an electrode incorporating activated carbon is provided, wherein the electrode comprises activated carbon comprising the electro-stabilizing agent at a concentration in the range of about 0.5% to about 3.5% by weight, and / or wherein the electrode comprises activated carbon comprising the wettability enhancing agent at a concentration in the range of about 0.1% to about 0.2% by weight.

[0084] In some embodiments, a supercapacitor having an electrode incorporating activated carbon is provided, wherein the electrode comprises activated carbon comprising the electro-stabilizing agent at a concentration in the range of about 1% to about 3.5% by weight, and / or wherein the electrode comprises activated carbon comprising the wettability enhancing agent at a concentration in the range of about 0.45% to about 1.0% by weight.

[0085] In some embodiments, electrodes fabricated from activated carbon materials as described herein are incorporated into solid-state lithium batteries, e.g. lithium-sulphur batteries. In some embodiments, activated carbon materials as described herein are incorporated into capacitors or supercapacitors.

[0086] In some embodiments, electrodes fabricated from activated carbon materials as described herein are incorporated into structures and / or components of building structures for energy storage. In some embodiments, energy storage systems incorporating activated carbons prepared as described herein may offer a higher energy density than materials fabricated from conventional activated carbons, may offer a lower risk of heat buildup within a building component or a building structure than materials fabricated from conventional activated carbons, may offer a greater number of charge and discharge cycles than materials fabricated with conventional activated carbons, and / or may offer faster charging rates than materials fabricated with conventional activated carbons.

[0087] In some embodiments, energy storage systems fabricated using activated carbons as described herein are embedded into modular building components, for example panels 18 that can be used as interior or exterior cladding for buildings, flooring, roofing, countertops, stairs or a staircase, cabinetry, or other building components. In some embodiments, the modular building components incorporate at least one supercapacitor or at least one battery having electrodes fabricated from an activated carbon material as described herein.

[0088] In some embodiments, the energy storage system is permanently incorporated into the modular building component, for example by being integrally cast within the modular building component when the modular building component is fabricated or by being permanently secured therein. In some embodiments, the energy storage system is removably incorporated into the modular building component, for example by being inserted within a compartment within the modular building component that is accessible via an access door, access panel, or other detachable or removable covering structure.

[0089] In some embodiments, the energy storage system fabricated using activated carbons as described herein is installed within a building structure during construction or erection of the building structure. The energy storage system can be incorporated into any desired part of the building structure during construction, for example a portion of the building structure that will minimize interference with the ordinary usage of the building structure, e.g. the walls, floors, ceilings or internal components thereof.

[0090] Providing a removably incorporated energy storage system allows for removal of the system for repair or replacement in the event of failure or once the energy storage system has reached the end of its useful service life. In embodiments in which the energy storage system is permanently installed, if a particular energy storage system fails or reaches the end of its useful service life, use of that particular energy storage system may be discontinued and / or that particular energy storage system may be disconnected from other energy storage systems while the physical energy storage unit remains in situ within the building structure.

[0091] In some embodiments, the energy storage system or modular building components incorporating the energy storage system are installed within a warehouse or other building structure that is of a relatively large size while not having a significant concentration of people generally situated therein (e.g. as would be the case with an office tower or residential building structure).

[0092] Individual energy storage systems that are integrated into modular building components or into buildings directly may be interconnected to one another and to the main 19 electricity supply grid in any manner. For example, appropriate connectors and cables can be incorporated into the modular building components or into building structures to allow individual energy storage systems to be interconnected.

[0093] Depending on the particular situation in which an energy storage system is deployed, the thermal properties of the modular building component or portion of the building into which the energy storage system is incorporated can be selected. For example, in embodiments in which the energy storage system is deployed in modular building panels that also serve an insulating function, the material of the modular building panel or building component can be selected to be thermally insulating. In alternative embodiments, the material of the modular building panel or building component can be selected to be thermally conductive, to allow heat to be transferred away from the energy storage system contained therein.

[0094] In embodiments in which a surface of the modular building component or portion of the building into which the energy storage system is incorporated is to be exposed to external elements, then at least that surface of the modular building component or portion of the building that is exposed to the external elements should be weatherproof (i.e. able to withstand rain, snow, wind, sun, and other weather conditions to which it may be exposed).

[0095] In embodiments in which the energy storage systems are incorporated into modular building components, then the modular building components can be provided with any appropriate surface configuration, connectors and / or fasteners to allow assembly of the modular building components into a building structure. Any of the variety of available modular building systems could be used for this purpose. In some embodiments, the connectors or fasteners that are incorporated into the modular building components can also serve as electrical connectors, to connect the contained energy storage system to the main electrical system of the building structure. Examples

[0096] Certain embodiments are further described with reference to the following examples, which are intended to be illustrative and not limiting in scope. Example 1 - Evaluation of Metal Doping of Activated Carbon

[0097] Aluminum (Al) as a wettability enhancing agent and / or copper (Cu) as an electrostabilizing agent were added to a commercially purchased activated carbon (YP50F, Calgon Carbon Corporation, denoted as YPAC). The resultant Al- and Cu-doped YPAC was treated with a sweeping gas (containing 10% hydrogen gas and 90% nitrogen gas) at 800-900°C for 3-6 hours. Supercapacitors fabricated with these Al and Cu doped electrodes were tested.

[0098] To conduct these studies, activated carbon YP50F obtained from Calgon Carbon Corporation and denoted in this description as YPAC was used. A process in the nature of that described with reference to FIG. 1 was used. In this study, supercapacitors having the following compositions were fabricated and tested. (1) Al-doped activated carbon: an aluminum salt (aluminum nitrate in this study) was converted to conductive AI-O with a thin layer on the resultant activated carbon. Without being bound, it is believed the AI-O doped activated carbon will have ion-interactive and adsorptive properties with polar substances resulting in improved capacitances at a fast discharging rate. An optimum AI-O content (expressed elemental Al content by weight in this example) in the doped activated carbon was determined to find a thin and conductive AI-O layer. (2) Cu-doped activated carbon: a copper salt (copper sulfate in this study) was converted to metallic (elemental) copper. Without being bound, this is believed to improve the internal resistance of the supercapacitor with a minimum degree of blockage on the micropores of YPAC by the elemental copper. In this study, optimum copper content in the doped activated carbon (expressed as elemental Cu content by weight in this example) was determined. (3) Al-Cu complex doping of activated carbon: The combination of Al and Cu doping may provide improved properties for the supercapacitor beyond that provided by Al or Cu doping alone. Materials and Methods

[0099] YP50F, Calgon Carbon Corporation (denoted as YPAC) was used for Al, Cu, and Al-Cu complex doping tests. The as-received YP50F (denoted YPAC) is a commercial activated carbon widely used for activated carbon-based supercapacitor applications because it has a high surface area, low ash, low resistance. The inventors treated YPAC with sweeping gas (with no metal doping) to strip out oxygen chemically bound to the YPAC. Untreated YPAC and the sweeping gas treated YPAC (denoted as YPAC+SG) were used as baselines (Baseline 1 and Baseline 2, respectively) for the comparison tests with metal-doped and sweeping gas treated YPAC.

[0100] To prepare the metal-doped activated carbon, aluminum nitrate (AI(NO3)3’9H2O) and copper sulfate (CuSO4*5H2O) were dissolved in R.O. (reverse osmosis) water for the Al and Cu additions to YPAC, respectively. The prepared solutions ranged from 0.075% to 2.5% w / w of elemental Al (or 0.14 to 4.85% aluminum nitrate with hydrate) and from 1% to 9.2% w / w elemental Cu per liter (or 0.53% to 5.36% copper sulfate with hydrate), respectively. Specifically, the following salt solutions were prepared for doping: 0.14% AI(NO3)3’9H2O (98%) for 0.075%; 0.28% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.15% Al; 0.57% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.3% Al; 0.85% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.45% Al; 1.44% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.75% Al; 1.91% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 1% Al; 4.85% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 2.5%; 0.53% CuSO4*5H2O (99%) for 1% Cu; 1.92% CuSO4*5H2O (99%) for 3.5% Cu; 2.71% CuSO4«5H2O (99%) for 4.9% Cu; 5.36% CuSO4«5H2O (99%) for 9.2% Cu.

[0101] A mass of 6 g YPAC was soaked in 45 mL of the prepared solution at room temperature for 1 hour under constant agitation conditions to add the desired Al and Cu content to YPAC, respectively. The soaked YPAC solution was dried by placing in an oven at 70°C to remove water (until there was no observable mass change). YPAC (6 g) was also prepared using Al (45 mL) and Cu (45 mL) salt solution for Al-Cu complex doped YPAC using the same method as the Al addition. The various samples were produced as follows: • Baseline 1: As-received YPAC (Baseline 1, not treated with sweeping gas). • Baseline 2: As-received YPAC was prepared using the sweeping gas treatment (not metal-doped). • Al-doped activated carbon: an Al-salt (aluminum nitrate) was added to YPAC to prepare 0.075%, 0.15%, 0.3%, 0.45%, 1%, and 2.5% Al (based on elemental Al content by weight) in YPAC, respectively. The Al source (converted to AI2O3 after the sweeping gas treatment) was used as a polarizing agent (i.e. a wettability enhancing agent) to improve ionic interactions of the resultant activated carbon. • Cu-doped activated carbon: Copper sulfate was added to YPAC to prepare 1%, 3.5%, and 4.87% by weight of Cu in YPAC, respectively. The Cu source (converted to metallic copper after the sweeping gas treatment) was used as a conductive agent to further stabilize electrodes. • Al-Cu complex-doped activated carbon: aluminum nitrate and copper sulfate were added in YPAC to prepare 0.45%AI-3.51%Cu and 0.75%AI-3.51% Cu in YPAC, by weight respectively. These concentrations were selected based on the best results of the tested supercapacitors fabricated with Al-doped and Cu-doped YPAC.

[0102] The dried YPAC+AI, YPAC+Cu, and YPAC + Al-Cu products were treated with sweeping gas at a flow rate of 1L / min, which flushed the dried YPAC+AI, YPAC+Cu, and YPAC+AI-Cu complex with a gas mixture containing 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen at 800 - 900°C for 3 - 6 hours. In the furnace used in this experiment which had a diameter of 6 inches (15.24 cm) and a surface area of 182 cm2, a flow rate of 1L / min yields a flow velocity through the treated products of approximately 5.5 cm / min. During this time, the treated product is exposed to a molar excess of hydrogen relative to the estimated oxygen content of the activated carbon (about 11%). Without being bound, it is believed this sweeping gas treatment removes the oxygen groups chemically bound to activated carbon and converts conductive Al, Cu, and Al-Cu salts to conductive AI-O, Cu, and Al-Cu complex in the activated carbon, respectively. For example, thermal decomposition of AI(NO3)3 to AI2O3 and thermal decomposition of CuSO4 to metallic Cu may occur. The former reaction may potentially involve a partial reaction with the supplied reducing gas. Further without being bound by theory, it is believed that the reducing gas may prevent conversion of copper back to copper oxide during this process. Subsequent to drying and sweeping gas treatment of the activated carbon product, one (1) mole of AI(NO3)3’9H2O and CuSO^FkO becomes 0.5 mole of AI2O3 (or 1 mole of Al expressed as elemental Al) and 1 mole of metallic Cu in the activated carbon, respectively.

[0103] FIG. 2 shows the fabrication processes for the electrodes used in supercapacitors tested in this example. The activated carbon slurry was prepared using 80% activated carbon, 10% graphite, and 10% binder (poly-vinyldienedifluoride) and N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) as solvent (a mass ratio of 1 solid: 2.5 NMP for standard activated carbon or 1 solid: 2 NMP for metal-doped activated carbon) through a high energy sonication. The activated carbon slurry was coated on an aluminum foil using a coating machine. The coated aluminum foil was dried at 80°C in a vacuum oven overnight. The dried aluminum foil was circled out to 15.0 mm in diameter. The resulting electrode was calendered at 200°C for 2 minutes and immediately compressed at 100 MPa. The compressed electrode was preconditioned at 150°C in a vacuum oven overnight and then the electrode was placed in an Ar-filled glove box for supercapacitor assembly. The electrode was assembled in the Ar-23 filled glove box using an airtight button cell (CR2032). Two identical electrodes were placed in the cell. The separator (Celgard, 25pm) was placed between two electrodes. The electrolyte (100 pL) for this cell assembly contains 1.5 M of tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate dissolved in acetonitrile.

[0104] It was observed that electrodes fabricated using metal-doped activated carbon required approximately 20% less solvent to prepare a slurry suitable for coating on the aluminum foil used to fabricate the electrodes as compared with the activated carbon controls that are more reflective of the properties of standard activated carbon, and further that the metal-doped activated carbon slurry exhibited better physical properties in coating the aluminum foil. Specifically, it was observed that the metal-doped activated carbon coated layers on the aluminum foil were stronger than the activated carbon alone, as evaluated using finger squeeze tests.

[0105] Galvano charge-discharge (GCD) tests were conducted to determine the specific capacitance of the supercapacitor (tested from a slow charge and discharge (CD) of 0.5 A / g to a fast CD of 5 A / g). The GCD measurements used potential ranging from 0 to 2.3 V at various current densities ranging from 0.5 A / g to 5 A / g. The capacitance retention (%) and internal resistance (milli-ohm) were calculated based on the following equation: capacitance (F / g) tested at 5 A / g capacitance retention (%) = -----------——-----------—— capacitance (F / g) tested at 0.5 A / g IR drop values were measured at a current density of 0.5 - 5 A / g. The internal resistance (milli-ohms) was calculated based on the correction between the IR drops and current densities. Results Al-Doped Activated Carbon

[0106] The initial performance results of supercapacitors (SCs) with baselines and Al-doped and sweeping gas-treated YPAC in Table 1 were tested at a slow discharge rate and fast discharge which are a current density of 0.5 A / g and 5 A / g, respectively. Table 1 shows the performance of SCs with the following baselines and Al-doped YPAC (+SG treatment): • YPAC (Baselinel): As-received • YPAC+3hSG (Baseline 2): As-received YPAC treated with SG at 800°C for 3 hrs • YPAC+AI-doped+3hSG: YPAC doped at 0.075%, 0.15%, 0.3%, 0.45%, 0.75%, and 1 % Al (using aluminum nitrate) and then treated with SG at 800°C for 3 hrs, respectively.

[0107] Four cells (CR2032) of SCs were fabricated for each YPAC-based SC group. The 5 three best cells in each Al-doped and SG-treated group were selected for comparison to baselines. The noted cells in Table 1 were not used for the comparison to determine the optimum Al-doping content. As shown in Table 1, baseline 1 and baseline 2 SCs achieved 80 - 84 F / g at a current density (slow discharge) of 0.5 A / g and 8 to 20 F / g at a current density (fast discharge) of 5 A / g, while Al-doped and SG-treated YPAC groups (#36, #34, 10 and #21) performed 81 - 92 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 41 - 71 F / g at 5 A / g. These YPAC groups (#36, #43, and #21) used YPAC doped between 0.45% to 1% Al by weight based on an elemental form indicates an optimum range for Al-dopant content under these particular tested conditions. Baseline SCs had an internal resistance ranging from 44 to 94 milli-Ohm. Al-doped and SG-treated YPAC groups had an internal resistance of 23 to 62 milli-Ohm, 15 resulting in higher capacitance retention than baseline. Table 1. Initial performance of SCs with Al-doping and SG-treatment using 0.075% to 2.5% Al. Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention Notes #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-5 0.5 0.219 133 76 100% Not used 5 2.614 0 0% #17-6 0.5 0.169 92 83 100% 5 1.820 10 13% #17-7 0.5 0.138 75 84 100% Best 5 1.492 20 24% #17-8 0.5 0.168 94 80 100% 5 1.863 8 10% #20, Baseline2 YP-SG #20-13 10.5 0.155 74 77 100% 5 1.492 18 24% #20-14 0.5 0.203 69 76 100% Not used 5 1.449 18 24% #20-15 0.5 0.239 47 76 100% 5 1.081 33 44% #20-16 0.5 0.090 44 81 100% Best 5 0.883 44 55% #23-2, YP+0.075%AI+3hS G #23-2 5 0.5 0.521 63 68 100% 5 1.650 22 32% #23-2 6 0.5 N / A 0 Not charge able / Not used 5 1.746 12 #23-2 7 0.5 0.110 82 89 100% 5 1.290 29 32% #23-2 8 0.5 0.103 66 88 100% 5 1.584 19 22% #29, 0.15%AI+3hSG #29-5 0.5 0.403 93 69 100% Not used 5 2.081 3 4% #29-6 0.5 0.152 47 78 100% 5 0.913 40 52% #29-7 0.5 0.157 42 77 100% 5 1.082 37 47% #29-8 0.5 0.102 51 79 100% 5 0.940 46 58% #25,YP+0.3%AI+3h SG #25-5 0.5 0.069 31 79 100% Not used 5 0.632 55 69% #25-6 0.5 0.085 40 83 100% 5 0.796 49 59% #25-7 0.5 0.109 53 83 100% 5 1.055 40 48% #25-8 0.5 0.187 62 87 100% 5 1.302 34 39% #36, YP+0.45%AI+3hSG #36-5 0.5 0.075 33 88 100% 5 0.658 58 66% #36-6 0.5 0.082 32 90 100% Best 5 0.812 56 63% #36-7 0.5 0.071 41 85 100% Not used 5 0.812 57 66% #36-8 0.5 0.065 41 92 100% 5 0.650 62 67% #43,YP+0.75%AI+3 hSG #43-1 0.5 0.094 44 86 100% 5 0.883 50 59% #43-2 0.5 0.098 46 74 100% Not used 5 0.933 40 54% #43-3 0.5 0.054 23 90 100% Best 5 0.470 71 79% #43-4 0.5 0.070 33 90 100% 5 0.654 61 68% #21,YP+1%AI+3hS G #21-5 0.5 0.090 46 80 100% Not used 5 0.910 44 55% #21-6 0.5 0.098 49 82 100% 5 0.982 41 50% #21-7 0.5 0.094 45 83 100% 5 0.897 45 55% #21-8 0.5 0.069 31 86 100% Best 5 0.618 62 72% #35,YP+2.5%AI+3h SG #35-5 0.5 0.122 58 81 100% Best 5 1.173 30 38% #35-6 0.5 0.124 56 55 100% 5 1.124 25 46% #35-7 0.5 0.151 73 82 100% 5 1.465 18 22% #35-8 Not charge able / Not used

[0108] Table 2 shows the performance results of the best supercapacitors (SC) in the Aldoped groups compared to the baselines 1 and 2 SCs. Each SC was cycled for 300 times at 0.5 A / g and 300 cycles at 5 A / g. The Al-doped YPAC SCs performed (80 - 86 F / g at 0.5 5 A / g, 30 - 51 at 5 A / g, 30 - 79 milliohm) better than Baseline SC (79 - 82 F / g at 1 A / g and 19 - 34 at 5 A / g, and 56 - 74 milliohm). Table 2. Long cycling performance of the best SC with Al-doping and SG-treatment using 0.45% to 1 % Al after 600 cycles (300 cycles at 0.5 A / g and 300 cycles at 5 A / g) Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-7 0.5 0.141 74 82 98% 5 1.471 19 23% #20, Baseline2 (YP+3h SG) #20-16 0.5 0.129 56 79 97% 5 1.137 34 42% #36, YP+0.45%AI+3hSG #36-6 0.5 0.097 42 86 95% 5 0.855 51 57% #43,YP+0.75%AI+3hSG #43-3 0.5 0.074 27 86 96% 5 0.553 64 71% #21,YP+1%AI+3hSG #21-8 0.5 0.104 71 80 93% 5 1.373 30 36% Cu-Doped Activated Carbon

[0109] Table 3 shows the initial performance results of Cu-doped and sweeping gas-treated supercapacitors (SCs) in comparison to Baseline SCs. Table 3 summarizes the 5 performance results of SCs with the following baselines and Al-doped YPAC (+SG treatment): • YPAC (Baselinel): As-received • YPAC+3hSG (Baseline 2): As-received YPAC treated with SG at 800°C for 3 hrs • YPAC+Cu-doped+3hSG: YPAC was doped at 1.0%, 3.51%, 4.87%, and 9.2% Cu 10          and then treated with SG at 800°C for 3 hrs, respectively.

[0110] Table 3 indicates cells with the optimum Cu dopant content (1 to 3.5% Cu, #22 and #32) in YPAC which performed better (77 - 84 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 35 - 56 at 5 A / g, and 56 -74 milliohm) than baselines SCs (79 - 82 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 19 to 34 at 5 A / g, and 56 - 74 milliohm). 15 Table 3. Initial performance of SCs with Cu-doping and SG-treatment using 1% to 9.2% Cu. Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistan ce (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention Notes #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-5 0.5 0.219 133 76 100% Not used 5 2.614 0 0% #17-6 0.5 0.169 92 83 100% 5 1.820 10 13% #17-7 0.5 0.138 75 84 100% Best 5 1.492 20 24% #17-8 0.5 0.168 94 80 100% 5 1.863 9 10% #20, Baseline2 #20-13 0.5 0.155 74 77 100% 5 1.492 18 24% #20-14 0.5 0.203 69 76 100% Not used 5 1.449 18 24% #20-15 0.5 0.239 47 76 100% 5 1.081 33 44% #20-16 0.5 0.090 44 81 100% Best 5 0.883 44 55% #22,YP+1%Cu+3 hSG #22-5 0.5 0.1103 6 52 78 100% 5 1.0463 4 35 45% #22-6 0.5 0.1042 6 46 91 100% Best 5 0.9279 3 44 48% #22-7 0.5 0.1283 7 68 73 100% Not used 5 1.3530 4 22 30% #22-8 0.5 0.1332 5 60 86 100% 5 1.2062 5 37 44% #32,YP+3.51%C u+3hSG #32-5 0.5 0.096 59 81 100% 5 1.153 36 44% #32-6 0.5 0.062 30 81 100% Best 5 0.593 56 69% #32-7 0.5 0.097 48 77 100% 5 0.958 43 56% #32-8 0.5 0.177 83 75 100% Not used 5 1.676 16 21% #31,YP+4.87%C #31-5 0.5 0.233 68 7 100% u+3hSG 5 1.463 25 33% #31-6 0.5 0.113 55 80 100% Best 5 1.096 36 45% #31-7 0.5 0.149 79 75 100% 5 1.564 16 21% #31-8 0.5 0.426 34 66 100% Not used 5 1.030 43 65% #30,YP+9.20%C u+3hSG #30-5 0.5 0.109 75 79 100% 5 1.093 34 43% Best #30-6 0.5 0.118 65 75 100% 5 1.291 27 36% #30-7 0.5 0.143 55 79 100% 5 1.495 21 27% #30-8 0.5 0 Not stable and not chargeable. Not used 5 0

[0111] Table 4 shows the long cycling performance results of the best supercapacitors (SCs) in the Cu-doped groups compared to the baseline 1 and 2 SCs. Each SC was cycled for 300 times at 0.5 A / g and 300 cycles at 5 A / g. The Cu-doped YPAC SCs performed 5 better than Baseline SC as follows: • Cu-doped and SG-treated Groups (#22 and #32): 78 - 78 F / g at 0.5 A / g, 42 - 51 at 5 A / g, 31 - 46 milliohm • Baseline SC: 79 - 82 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 19 - 34 at 5 A / g, and 56 - 74 milliohm 10 Table 4. Long cycling performance of the best SC with Cu-doping and SG-treatment using 1 % to 4.87% Al after 600 cycles (300 cycles at 0.5 A / g and 300 cycles at 5 A / g) Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-7 0.5 0.14119 74 82 98% 5 1.471448 19 23% #20, Baseline2 #20-16 0.5 0.129 56 79 97% 5 1.137 34 42% #22,YP+1%Cu+3hSG #22-6 0.5 0.079 46 78 91% 5 0.899 42 49% #32,YP+3.51 %%Cu+3hSG #32-6 0.5 0.079 31 78 97% 5 0.634 51 64% #31,YP+4.87%Cu+3hSG #31-6 0.5 0.098 53 78 97% 5 1.047 34 42% Al-Cu Complex Doping of Activated Carbon

[0112] There are advantages of Al and Cu doping, respectively. Without being bound by theory, low Al-doping provides the electrode with better interactive and adsorptive 5 properties with polar substances. A high Cu-doping gives improved conductivity of the electrode for SC applications. Table 5 shows the sweeping gas treatment for the conversion of the Al-Cu mixture to the conductive Al-Cu complex. Initially, a volume of 45 mL each was added in a crucible and the prepared crucible (a total of 90 mL) was placed in a 70°C oven until all water was removed. The dried solid mixture was treated with sweeping gas at 800 -10   900°C for 3 - 6 hrs. These trials were conducted with the mixture solution alone (without activated carbon) to determine optimum temperature and retention time prior to metaldoping the activated carbon.

[0113] Trials 1 and 2 show the mixture treated with sweeping gas for 3 hrs and 6 hrs at 800°C. The resultant product from Trial 1 (800°C for 3 hrs) was not conductive, and the 15 Trial 2 product became conductive after the SG treatment at 800°C for 6 hrs. The resultant product from Trial 3 (900°C for 3 hrs) was conductive. The Trial 3 product had 323% relative resistance based on the MTI graphite. The Trial 4 product achieved greater conductivity after the sweeping gas treatment at 900°C for 6 hrs and had 180% relative resistance. 20 Table 5. Conductiveness of Al-Cu complex after sweeping gas treatment. Process conditions Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Solution type and mixing volume 45 mL of 0.45%-AI mixed with 45 mL of 3.51% Cu 45 mL of 0.45%-AI mixed with 45 mL of 3.51% Cu 45 mL of 0.45%-AI mixed with 45 mL of 3.51% Cu 45 mL of 0.45%-AI mixed with 45 mL of 3.51% Cu Drying temperature 70°C 70°C 70°C 70°C Temperature of SG treatment after drying 800°C 800°C 900°C 900°C Retention time of SG treatment 3hr 6hr 3hr 6hr Conduciveness tested using a multimeter No No Yes Yes Relative resistance based on MTI graphite Not tested Not tested 323% 180%

[0114] Table 6 examines the mass balance of the mixture solution. Table 6 compares a collected mass of the Trial 4 product with a theoretical mass based on the initial mass of aluminum nitrate and copper sulfate which are fully converted to the Al-Cu complex (without 5 being bound by theory, believed to be AI2O3 homogeneously blended with elemental copper). Table 6 shows that the calculated mass of the product agreed with the collected mass of the Trial 4 product. Table 6. Mass balance of Al-Cu complex after sweeping gas treatment. Salt type used Solution (g) added in the crucible Salt concentration (wt. %) in the solution Mass (g) theoretically calculated based on the added solution Collected mass of SG treatment After dehydration (drying) After SG treatment Salt with hydrate (g of Al (NO3)3-9H2O or CuSO4-5H2O) in the crucible Anhydrous salt (g of Al (NO3)3 or CUSO4) in the crucible Product mass (g of Al-Cu complex) Al-salt solution 45.02 0.83% 0.375 0.213 0.051 NA Cu-salt solution 45.027 3.07% 1.381 0.597 0.351 NA Sum (g) in the crucible 90.047 NA 1.755 0.810 0.402 0.407 10

[0115] Table 7 summarizes the initial performance results of Al and Cu-doped and sweeping gas-treated supercapacitors (SCs) in comparison to Baseline SCs. Table 7 shows the initial performance results produced by the following trials: • YPAC (Baselinel, #17): As-received. • YPAC+3hSG (Baseline 2, #20): As-received YPAC treated with SG at 800°C for 3 hrs. • YPAC+0.45%AI+3.51 %Cu-doped+3hSG900 (#38-1): YPAC doped using 0.45% Al and 3.51% Cu and then treated with SG at 900°C for 3 hrs. • YPAC+0.45%AI+3.51 %Cu-doped+6hSG900 (#42): YPAC was doped using 0.45% Al and 3.51% Cu and then treated with SG at 900°C for 6 hrs, respectively. • YPAC+0.75%AI+3.51 %Cu-doped+6hSG900 (#46): YPAC was doped using 0.75% Al and 3.51% Cu and then treated with SG at 900°C for 6 hrs, respectively.

[0116] Groups #42 and # 46 achieved the following results which are better than baseline 1 and 2. • Al and Cu-doped and SG-treated Groups (#42 and #46): 87 - 92 F / g at 0.5 A / g, 37 -64 at 5 A / g, 29 - 51 milliohm. • Baseline SC: 79 - 82 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 19 - 34 at 5 A / g, and 56 - 74 milliohm. The group #38-1 yielded a similar result to Baseline 2, suggesting the sweeping gas treatment time of 3 hrs was not long enough for Al-Cu-doping in YPAC under the tested conditions. Table 7. Initial performance of SCs with Al-Cu-doping and sweeping gas-treatment. Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention Notes #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-5 0.5 0.219 133 76 100% Not used 5 2.614 0 0% #17-6 0.5 0.169 92 83 100% 5 1.820 10 13% #17-7 0.5 0.138 75 84 100% Best 5 1.492 20 24% #17-8 0.5 0.168 94 80 100% 5 1.863 8 10% #20, Baseline2 #20-13 0.5 0.155 74 77 100% 5 1.492 18 24% #20-14 0.5 0.203 69 76 100% Not used 5 1.449 18 24% #20-15 0.5 0.239 47 76 100% 5 1.081 33 44% #20-16 0.5 0.090 44 81 100% Best 5 0.883 44 55% #38-1, 0.45%AI+3.51%Cu+3h SG900 #38-1-1 0.5 0.100 65 78 100% 5 1.201 32 41% #38-1-2 0.5 0.091 36 78 100% 5 0.741 48 61% #38-1-3 0.5 0.095 61 77 100% Not used 5 1.265 29 37% #38-1-4 0.5 0.102 50 77 100% Best 5 0.999 40 52% #42, 0.45%AI+3.51%Cu+6h SG900 #42-1 0.5 0.181 N / A 87 100% Not used 5 Note 1 0 0% #42-2 0.5 0.098 50 92 100% 5 0.998 49 53% #42-3 0.5 0.077 42 92 100% Best 5 0.837 56 60% #42-4 0.5 0.064 29 96 110% 5 0.590 64 73% #46, 0.75%AI+3.51%Cu+6h SG900 #46-1 0.5 0.115 51 88 100% 5 1.028 44 51% #46-2 0.5 0.076 34 91 100% Best 5 0.692 58 64% #46-3 0.5 0.097 42 71 100% Not used 5 0.860 47 67% #46-4 (Note 2) 0.5 0.066 51 102 100% Unstabl e 5 0.546 74 46% Notes: 1. #42-1 cell was not charged at the initial tests, and it performed 97 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 57 F / g at 5 A / g after 2 days rest. 2. #46-4 cell was unstable at the initial tests. It became stable after 1 week rest and achieved 111 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 64 F / g at 5 A / g (internal resistance of 51 mQ). 5

[0117] Table 8 shows the long cycling performance results of the best SC in the Al and Cu- doped groups compared to the baseline 1 and 2 SCs. Each SC group achieved the following results after 300 cycles at 1A / g and 300 cycles at 10 A / g. The Al and Cu-doped YPAC SCs performed better than Baselines SC as follows: • Al and Cu-doped and sweeping gas-treated Groups (#42-2 and #46-2): 86 - 90 F / g 10          at 0.5 A / g, 53 - 57 at 5 A / g, 36 - 38 milliohm. • Baselines SC: 79 - 82 F / g at 0.5 A / g and 19 - 34 at 5 A / g, and 56 - 74 milliohm. Table 8. Long cycling performance of the best supercapacitors with Al and Cu-doping and sweeping gas-treatment using optimum Al and Cu content after 600 cycles (300 cycles at 15   0.5 A / g and 300 cycles at 5 A / g). Carbon type Cell ID Specific applied current (A / g) IR-drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Capacitance retention #17, Y1, YP-AR (Baselinel) #17-7 0.5 0.14119 74 82 98% 5 1.471448 19 23% #20, Baseline2 #20-16 0.5 0.129 56 79 97% 5 1.137 34 42% #38-1, 0.45%AI+3.51%Cu+3hSG9 00 #38-1 4 0.5 0.131 59 66 86% 5 1.194 31 41% #42, 0.45%AI+3.51%Cu+6hSG9 00 #42-2 0.5 0.078 38 92 101% 5 0.766 53 58% #46, 0.75%AI+3.51%Cu+6hSG9 00 #46-2 0.5 0.073 36 90 98% 5 0.727 57 62% In summary, the following performance data were confirmed by the foregoing examples: • Baseline2-based supercapacitors achieved similar performance to Baselinel at the slow discharge of 0.5 A / g (low amperage loading), while Baseline2-based supercapacitor performed significantly better than Baseline 1 at the fast discharge of 5          5 A / g (high amperage loading). • The YPAC+AI+SG based SC achieved better performance than Baselines 1 and 2. • The YPAC+Cu+SG based SC performed better performance at the fast discharge of 10 A / g than Baselines 1 and 2. • The YPAC+AI+Cu+SG based SC achieved the best results among compared SCs. 10      • The optimum content of the Al-Cu mixture in YPAC was any concentration within the optimum range of 0.45 -1% Al and 1 - 3.5% Cu by mass.

[0118] Table 9 summarizes results for various experimental samples to demonstrate how treatment with sweeping gas and embedment of aluminum and copper enhance the 15 capacitance of the tested capacitors. The metal-doped activated carbon was found to produce capacitors with 2.9 times greater area and volumetric capacitance than capacitors fabricated from regular activated carbon. Table 9. Area and volumetric capacitance for selected experimental examples. Cell ID Areal capacitance Capacitance increase (%) at fast discharge (5 A / g) (F / cm2) at 0.5 A / g (F / cm2) at 5 A / g Benchmark YPAC (Baseline 1, #17-7 cell in Table 8) 57.3 13.3 100% Benchmark YPAC+SG (Baseline 2, #20-16 cell in Table 8) 61.1 26.3 197% YPAC+0.75%AI+3.51 %CuSG900 (#46-2 cell in Table 8) 62.8 39.7 298% Cell ID Volumetric capacitance Capacitance increase (%) at fast discharge (5A / g) (F / cm3) at 0.5 A / g (F / cm3) at 5 A / g Benchmark YPAC (Baseline 1, #17-7 cell in Table 8) 19.1 4.4 100% Benchmark YPAC+SG (Baseline 2, #20-16 cell in Table 8) 20.4 8.8 197% YPAC+0.75%AI+3.51 %CuSG900 (#46-2 cell in Table 8) 20.9 13.2 298%

[0119] In conclusion, the foregoing examples demonstrate that the sweeping gas treatment together with Al and Cu-doping improved the performance of supercapacitors fabricated from activated carbon (YPAC). Without being bound, it is believed that the sweeping gas treatment with Al-doping (AhOs-doping) and Cu-doping can improve ionic interactions and provide improved resistance properties for activated carbon-based supercapacitors with high capacitance and high stability. A low Al-doping improves the wettability of the electrode by providing the electrode with improved hydrophilic and adsorptive properties. A high Cu-doping gives improved conductivity of the electrode for supercapacitor applications. Without being bound by theory, the electrolyte used to test the supercapacitors in these examples contains the conductive salt tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate, TEABF4, dissolved in acetonitrile, which is a hydrophilic solvent. The activated carbon produced by the sweeping gas treatment is highly hydrophobic due to the removal of oxygen-based functional groups. Thus, the wettability (i.e. hydrophilicity) of the electrode is poor due to the hydrophobic surface of the activated carbon. This poor wettability is believed to contribute to a poor ion mobility of TEABF4 in the activated carbon electrodes, resulting in a poor internal resistance of the activated carbon based supercapacitors. Doping with aluminum that is believed to be converted to an AI2O3 or AIO form improves the wettability of the electrolyte with the surface of the activated carbon electrode, thereby improving the performance of the supercapacitor.

[0120] Without limitation, embodiments can include the following aspects: • An activated carbon product doped with aluminum and treated with a sweeping gas process at elevated temperature in which the elemental aluminum concentration ranges from 0.45% to 1 % by weight (e.g. present as an AI2O3 form) in activated carbon. • An activated carbon product doped with copper and treated with a sweeping gas process at elevated temperature in which the elemental copper concentration ranges from 1% to 3.5% by weight. • An activated carbon product doped with both aluminum and copper and treated with a sweeping gas process at elevated temperature in which the elemental concentrations of aluminum and copper are from 0.45% to 1% by weight and less than 3.5% by weight, respectively (or wherein the elemental concentration of copper is between 1% and 3.5% by weight). • The coating of activated carbon doped with a wettability enhancing agent on aluminum foil for electrode fabrication needs 20% less solvent than typical activated carbon when used as an electrode material. Example 2 - Supercapacitors Prepared with Metal-Doped and SG-Treated LAAC

[0121] Activated carbon made from lignin-A (“LAAC”) (micronized) was treated with sweeping gas treatment, and the sweeping gas-treated LAAC was used as a baseline for supercapacitor performance tests in comparison to supercapacitors with metal-doped+SG-treated LAAC. Based on the optimum dopant content using YP50AC, LAAC was doped with the Al source in a range from 0.45% to 1.5% Al and with 3%Cu followed by sweeping gas (SG) treatment.

[0122] Supercapacitors were assembled with baseline LAAC and metal-doped+SG-treated LAAC. Four (4) cells were assembled for each group and tested at a low amperage loading of 0.5 A / g and a high amperage loading of 5 A / g. Each cell was tested for initial capacitance and internal resistance. The best cell in each group was selected for 600 cycle tests based on the high capacitance with low internal resistance.

[0123] Table 10 shows the properties of the SG-LAAC (micronized). The mean sizes of the milled LAAC were 5.8 pm. The milled LAAC was used for metal-doping and SG-treatment. The milled LAAC had 97.5 % carbon content and 0.29% ash content. Iodine number for the milled LAAC was 3,050 mg / g which was slightly decreased before milling. The BET surface of the milled LAAC was computed to be 2,900 m2 / g using a correlation (y = 0.9374x+47.781, R2 = 0.9416) between Iodine values and BET surface area values (based on nitrogen adsorption) measured from previous activated-carbon samples. The relative electrical resistance of the milled LAAC is within the typical value (225%). Table 10. Properties of the SG-LAAC (micronized) used for metal-doping and SG-treatment. Carbon (%) Ash (%) Iodine (mg / g) Surface area (m2 / g) calculated using iodine values (Note) Relative electrical resistance (%) Mean particle size (pm) 97.5 0.29 3,050 2,900 225% 5.8 Note: Surface area (m2 / g) was calculated using a correlation between Iodine values and BET surface area values.

[0124] Table 11 summarizes the initial capacitance and initial internal resistance of the supercapacitors (SCs). Group #111 is the baseline SCs with the SG-treated LAAC. Groups #112, #113, #124, #122, and #123 are SCs with metal doped and SG-treated LAAC which were compared with the baseline SCs. The worst cell in each group was excluded to select the best cell based on internal resistance and capacitance.

[0125] At the low amperage loading (0.5 A / g), the baseline SCs (with the SG-treated LAAC) achieved the best performance (144 - 155 F / g) in comparison with SCs with doped and SG-treated LAAC (127 to 155 F / g from Groups #112, #113, #124, #122, and #123), while groups #113 and # 124 SCs consistently performed better than the baseline SCs (106 -123 F / g) at the high amperage loading. Groups #113 and #124 SCs had LAAC-based electrodes which were doped with 0.75% AI+3%Cu and 1%AI+3%Cu by weight, respectively. These doped LAACs were treated with SG before the SC assembly.

[0126] The initial internal resistance values (28 - 62 mQ-g) of SC groups with metal-doped and SG-treated LAAC were tested to be lower (or better) than the baseline SCs (43 - 62 mQ-g) except for Group #112 (30 - 92 mQ-g). These low internal resistance values of the doped and SG-treated SC groups are responsible for achieving higher capacitance values than the baseline SCs at the high amperage loading.

[0127] These results also suggest that doped Al and Cu sources may partially block the surface of the SG-treated LAAC resulting in slightly lower capacitance than the baseline SCs at the low amperage loading. Based on the consistent results of capacitance and internal resistance, the best cell from the baseline and other groups was selected for 600 cycle tests except for group #112 which performed inconsistently with poor internal resistance. Table 11. Initial performance of the SG-treated LAAC in comparison with doped and SG-treated LAAC. Type of LAAC Cell ID Amperage loading (A / g) IRdrop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Note #111 (Baseline, SG-treated LAAC) #111-5 0.5 0.057 52 155 5 0.525 120 #111-6 0.5 0.077 72 155 Worst and excluded 5 0.726 102 #111-7 0.5 0.067 62 144 5 0.624 106 #111-8 0.5 0.050 43 152 Best and selected for 600 cycle test 5 0.443 123 #112: 0.45%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #112-5 0.5 0.175 79 98 Worst and excluded 5.0 0.890 64 #112-6 0.5 0.111 92 141 5.0 0.941 78 #112-7 0.5 0.038 30 139 5.0 0.305 121 #112-8 0.5 0.064 51 133 5.0 0.522 104 #113: 0.75%AI+3%Cu+LAAC #113-5 0.5 0.050 38 129 5.0 0.394 105 #113-6 0.5 Not tested Not tested Worst and excluded (poorly assembled) 5.0 Not tested Not tested #113-7 0.5 0.048 40 155 5.0 0.408 128 #113-8 0.5 0.044 36 135 Best and selected for 600 cycle test 5.0 0.366 112 #124: l%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #124-1 0.5 0.039 33 128 5 0.337 107 #124-2 0.5 0.066 62 129 Worst and excluded 5 0.621 93 #124-3 0.5 0.039 30 154 5 0.309 133 #124-4 0.5 0.034 26 135 Best and selected for 600 cycle test 5 0.266 115 #122: 1.25%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #122-1 0.5 0.034 30 121 Worst and excluded 5.0 0.304 106 #122-2 0.5 0.036 28 127 5.0 0.288 113 #122-3 0.5 0.037 26 129 Best and selected for 600 cycle test 5.0 0.267 113 #122-4 0.5 0.031 21 157 5.0 0.224 135 #123: 1.5%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #123-1 0.5 0.043 32 142 5.0 0.327 123 #123-2 0.5 0.042 34 128 5.0 0.352 105 #123-3 0.5 0.044 30 123 Worst and excluded 5.0 0.342 103 #123-4 0.5 0.038 33 138 Best and selected ||      5.0      |     0.310     ||      113      | for 600 cycle test

[0128] Table 12 shows the capacitance and internal resistance of the best SC that was selected from the baseline and other groups except for group #112 and then tested after 300 cycles at the low amperage loading and 300 cycles at the high amperage loading. The baseline SCs (150 F / g) performed better than the other groups (117-126 F / g) at the low amperage, while the baseline SC achieved a lower capacitance (97 F / g) at the high amperage loading than groups #113 and #124 (109 - 113F / g).

[0129] The internal resistance of groups #112, #113, and #124 SCs ranged from 28 to 33 mQ-g which was much lower than the baseline SCs (78 mQ-g). The internal resistance of groups #112, #113, and #124 SCs has small changes after 600 cycles, while the internal resistance of the baseline SCs became worse indicating that the baseline SCs are not stable at the high amperage loading.

[0130] Since groups #113 and #124 consistently yielded better capacitance (109 — 113 F / g or 12% -16% higher) and lower internal resistance than the baseline SCs, optimum metal dopant content for this particular activated carbon under the tested conditions appears to be 0.75% AI+3%Cu and 1%AI+3%Cu for LAAC. This optimum content is slightly higher than optimal dopant content determined for YP50AC (0.45% AI+3%Cu and 0.75%AI+3%Cu).

[0131] It is also noted that the SG-treated LAAC has a low electrical resistance (225%) and super high surface area (2,900 m2 / g) that are much better material performance properties than YP50AC (434% and 1,876 m2 / g of SG-treated YP50AC). Without being bound by theory, the electrode enhancement with metal doping may improve the properties of YP50AC more than LAAC, which already has relatively low resistance and high surface area (or high ion-adsorptive capability) that are sufficient for supercapacitor (SC) applications at a low amperage loading. Table 12. 600 cycle performance of the SG-treated LAAC in comparison with doped and SG-treated LAAC. Type of LAAC Cell ID Amperage loading (A / g) IR drop (V) Internal resistance (mQ-g) Capacitance (F / g) Baseline: SG-treated LAAC #111-8 0.5 0.088 78 150 5 0.789 97 0.75%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #113-8 0.5 0.039 32 126 5 0.326 109 l%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #124-4 0.5 0.034 28 127 5.0 0.284 113 1.25%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #122-3 0.5 0.049 31 121 5.0 0.457 98 1.5%AI+3%Cu+SG+LAAC #123-4 0.5 0.043 32 117 5.0 0.334 101

[0132] The following findings were made based on this study: • The optimum Al and Cu dopant content under tested conditions were determined to be 0.75% AI+3%Cu and 1%AI+3%Cu for LAAC which is slightly higher than dopant content for YP50AC (0.45% AI+3%Cu and 0.75%AI+3%Cu). • SCs with the optimum Al-Cu doped and SG-treated LAAC were demonstrated to be 12% - 16% higher capacitance than the baseline SCs (SCs with SG-treated LAAC) at a high amperage loading which is important for high amperage SCs (5 A / g). • The optimum Al-Cu doped and SG-treated LAAC electrode does not improve capacitance at a low amperage loading (0.5 A / g).

[0133] Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the electrode enhancement with metal doping may improve YP50AC more than LAAC because LAAC already has low resistance and high surface area (or high ion-adsorptive capability that are enough for SC applications (at a low amperage loading). Example 3 - LiSBs with Metal-Doped, SG-treated and S-Impreqnated LAAC

[0134] LiS batteries use sulphur as the active material in the cathode which is reduced to polysulfide intermediates during the discharge mode. These polysulfides that are polar and highly soluble in the electrolyte leak from the cathode to the anode (known as the shuttle effect). The diffused polysulfides are further reduced to the low order sulfides and deposit as a passive solid, which is irreversible. As a result, the LiS battery fails to provide the theoretical energy density. This study employs highly ion-adsorptive AC with micro-pores (< 2 nm in width) and a metal-doping technique to trap polysulfides in the cathode to overcome the shuttle effect.

[0135] The main objective of this study was to optimize the content of Al-Cu mixture in the cathode of LiS batteries which contain non-conductive sulphur. To improve the interaction of the lignin-based activated carbon cathode with polar-based electrolyte in the LiSB system 42 while minimizing loss of electrical conductivity by the sulphur impregnation after the doping and SG treatment, LAAC was doped at a lower content of Al-Cu mixture for LiSBs than the optimum Al-Cu mixture for supercapacitors. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the sulphur impregnation of the activated carbon to generate the cathode for the LiS battery may further increase the resistance of the cathode. Sulphur is electrically insulating, and the micropore space of the activated carbon is occupied by the impregnated sulphur.

[0136] Lignin-based activated carbon or LAAC was used for Al-Cu mixture doping. The LAAC was produced using lignin A obtained from a lignin recovery plant in Alberta, Canada, which has a high surface area, low ash, and low resistance. The activated carbon was metal-doped following the procedure illustrated in FIG. 3, with drying being conducted at a temperature of 60-80°C.

[0137] For this example, the LAAC was doped with an Al-doping range from 0 to 0.45% Al and at 3% Cu. To dope the desired content of the Al-Cu mixture, LAAC (6 g) was also added in 45 mL aluminum nitrate (0.28% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.15% w / w Al; 0.57% AI(NO3)3*9H2O (98%) for 0.3% w / w Al; and 0.85% AI(NO3)3«9H2O (98%) for 0.45% w / w Al) and 45 mL copper sulfate (1.63% CuSO4’5H2O (99%) for 3% w / w Cu) solutions, respectively. The soaked LAAC solution was placed in an oven at 70°C to remove water until no further mass change was observed. The following metal-doped LAAC samples were prepared for the SG treatment: • Baseline: LAAC-treated with SG • Al-Cu mixture doping: Aluminum nitrate and copper sulfate were added in LAAC to prepare the following content of Al-Cu mixture o 0.15%AI plus 3% Cu (w / w) o 0.3%AI plus 3% Cu (w / w) o 0.45%AI plus 3% Cu (w / w)

[0138] The dried LAAC and Al-Cu doped LAAC products were treated with sweeping gas containing 90% nitrogen and 10% hydrogen. The sweeping gas flushed the dried LAAC and Al-Cu doped LAAC products at a flow rate of 100 mL / min in a 6 inch tube under temperature of 900°C for 6 hours. This sweeping gas treatment removes the oxygen groups chemically bound to the activated carbon and converts the Al-Cu salts to a conductive Al-Cu mixture in the activated carbon. Through this treatment, one (1) mole of AI(NO3)3*9H2O and CuSO4*5H2O becomes 0.5 mole of AI2O3 (or 1 mole of Al expressed as elemental Al) and 1 mole of metallic Cu, respectively.

[0139] The sulphur impregnation process involves the dissolution of granular S° (elemental sulphur) in liquid ammonia (LNH3) under the ammonia vapor pressure (approx. 110 psig at room temperature), for example as described in PCT publication No. WO 2021 / 248245. The dissolved S° in LNH3 is then adsorbed onto LAAC by simple immersion of the carbon in the solution. S-impregnated activated carbon can then be collected after the sample is removed from the pressurized environment and at that time vaporization of the LHN3 at room temperature (RT) occurs. The vaporization leaves the sulphur behind and the impregnated carbon is ready to use as a cathode material for LiS batteries. The following cathode materials were prepared: • Baseline: LAAC treated with SG containing 63.12% sulphur • 0.15% Al and 3.0% Cu-doped and SG-treated LAAC containing 71.0% sulphur w / w • 0.3% Al and 3.0% Cu-doped and SG-treated LAAC containing 67.3% sulphur w / w • 0.45% Al and 3.0% Cu-doped and SG-treated LAAC containing 65.97% sulphur w / w USB assembly

[0140] In the fabrication method for the cathode of the LiSB (according to an example process as illustrated in FIG. 4), the S°-impregnated activated carbon, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) (binder), and graphite (as a conductive agent) were suspended in a paste using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) using a mass ratio of 60:20:20, respectively. The carbon-sulphur (C-S) composite paste was homogenized using ultrasonication for 20 minutes and then coated onto Al foil using a doctor blade coating machine. The Al foil, now thinly coated with the C-S composite, was dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h for NMP removal. 15 mm diameter disks were punched out as the cathode. A 15 mm diameter lithium disc, used as the anode material, was punched out of a lithium strip (40 mm wide and 0.6 mm thick) in an argon-filled glovebox and the electrodes were assembled using CR 2032 (a swagelock type coin cell) in the argon-filled glovebox. The electrolyte (containing 1 M of lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiN(SO2CF3)2) and 1% lithium nitrate in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and 1,3-dioxolane (DOXL)) was added to each cell using an electrolyte volume per mg of sulphur in the cathode ranging from 40 to 115 pL. Performance tests of LiSBs

[0141] Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) was tested for determination of the specific capacity (mAh / g) of the Li-S battery with the lignin-based cathode. The GCD measurements used potential ranging from 1.7 to 3.0 V (100% DoD, depth of discharge) at a current density of 1.0 Coulomb (C) / g or 1,675 mA / g. LiS batteries were also 500 times cycled for cyclability using the GCD method. The capacity and capacity retention were calculated using the following equation: • Capacity (mAh / g) from GCD =Applied current (A) x discharge time (sec) / 60 x 60 x mass of sulphur in the cathode (g) • Capacity retention (%) = Capacity at a number of cycles tested with 100% DoD I initial capacity at the 1st cycle tested with 100% DoD Properties of SG-treated LAAC used for sulphur impregnations

[0142] Table 13 shows the major chemical and adsorptive properties (iodine values and surface area) of LAAC. The SG-treated LAAC had a carbon content of 98.1%, an iodine value of 3,140 mg / g, and a surface area of 3,203 m2 / g with a mean pore size of 1.13 nm, and 14.3 pm mean particle size. Table 13. Property comparison of LAAC. Carbon ID Carbon content (%) Iodine value (mg / g) BET Surface area (m2 / g) Mean pore size (nm) Mean particle size (pm) SG-treated LAAC 98.10% 3,140 3,203 1.13 14.3

[0143] LiSBs were assembled using the following sulphur impregnated LAAC based cathode materials: • Cell LC21-27-5: 0%AI+0%Cu+SG+63.12%S (Baseline) • Cell LC21-25-9: 0.15%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+71,0%S • Cell LC21-23-16: 0.3%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+67.30%S • Cell LC21-26-7: 0.45%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+65.97%S

[0144] These cells (CR 2032, 15 mm in diameter) had the following components: • Cathode: 60 (AC-S): 20 (graphite): 20 (PVDF) coated on aluminum foil • Electrolyte: 1 M of lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiN(SO2CF3)2) and 1% lithium nitrate in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) and 1,3-dioxolane (DOXL). • Electrolyte amount used: 40 - 52 pL per 1 mg of active sulphur in the cathode • Separator: Celgard 25 micrometer film • Anode: 0.2 mm lithium metal Performance of LiSB with sulphur impregnated LA AC cathode

[0145] Table 14 shows performance results of LiSBs with baseline LAAC and doped and SG treated LAAC which contained 63-71 % sulphur content. All cells were cycled 500 times at 1 C / g using a 100% depth of discharge (1.7 - 3.0 V).

[0146] The 2nd cycle capacity of LiSBs with the baseline cathode (LC21-27-5) was 590 mAh / g which dropped by approx. 5% of the 1st cycled capacity (622 mAh / g). The capacity of the baseline LiSB continuously dropped to the 500th cycle. The capacity retention of LC21-27-5 was 55.9% (based on the 1st cycled capacity) after 500 cycles. Interestingly, the 2nd cycled capacity of LiSBs with the 0.15%AI+3%Cu+SG cathode (LC 21-25-9) was 665 mAh / g which increased by 10% of the 1st cycled capacity (594 mAh / g). The capacity retention (%) for LC 21-25-9 was calculated based on the 2nd capacity. The 500 cycled capacity retention of LC21-25-9 was 74.4% which is significantly improved when compared with the baseline LiSB.

[0147] LiSBs with other metal doped and SG-treated cathodes (LC21-23-16 for 0.3%AI+3%Cu+SG and LC21-26-7 for 0.45%AI+3%Cu+SG) had initial capacities of 601 and 570 mAh / g, respectively. These two cells had poorer capacity retention (36.1% and 33.7%, respectively) than the baseline cells. Table 14. LiS batteries with sulphur-impregnated LAAC tested 500 cycles at 1 C / g and 100% DoD. Cell ID Parameter s # of cycles 1 2 50 100 200 300 400 500 LC21-27-5 (baseline): 0%AI+0%Cu+SG+63.12%S Capacity (mAh / g) 622 590 581 512 458 403 373 348 Capacity retention (%) 100.0 % 94.9% 93.3 % 82.3 % 73.6 % 64.7 % 60.0 % 55.9 % LC21-25-9: 0.15%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+71.0%S Capacity (mAh / g) 594 655 608 566 556 531 516 487 Capacity retention (%) 90.6% 100.0 % 92.8 % 86.4 % 84.9 % 81.0 % 78.7 % 74.4 % LC21-23-16: 0.3%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+67.30%S Capacity (mAh / g) 601 536 536 507 369 323 258 217 Capacity retention (%) 100.0 % 89.2% 89.2 % 84.4 % 61.4 % 53.8 % 42.9 % 36.1 % LC21-26-7: 0.45%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+65.97% Capacity (mAh / g) 570 540 491 422 368 319 242 192 s Capacity retention (%) 100.0 % 94.8% 86.2 % 74.1 % 64.5 % 56.0 % 42.6 % 33.7 %

[0148] The two best LiSBs with baseline (LC21-27-8) and 0.15%+3%Cu+SG (LC21-25-10) were tested to confirm the effect of doping+SG treatment on the capacity retention improvement of LiSBs. The LiSB with the baseline cathode was tested to be a 1st cycled capacity of 696 mAh / g and capacity retention of 55.7% (388 mAh / g) after 500 cycles, while the LiSB with 0.15%+3%Cu+SG cathode (LC21-25-10) achieved 1st cycled and 2nd cycled capacity of 462 and 578 mAh / g, respectively. The 500 cycled capacity retention of LC21-25-10 was 70.5% (407 mAh / g) based on the 2nd capacity value. As observed in Table 14, the 2nd cycled capacity of LC21-25-10 in Table 15 also increased from the initial capacity value. This increase of capacity after the 1st capacity is shown in FIGS. 5-12 as further discussed below. Table 15. LiS batteries LiSBs with baseline cathode in comparison with the best doped and SG treated cathode tested 500 cycles at 1C / g and 100% DoD. Cell ID Parameter s # of cycles 1 2 50 100 200 300 400 500 Baseline-LC21-27-8: 0%AI+0%Cu+SG+63.12%S Capacity (mAh / g) 696 663 637 532 471 430 390 388 Capacity retention (%) 100.0 % 95.3% 91.5% 76.5 % 67.7 % 61.8 % 56.1 % 55.7 % LC21-25-10: 0.15%AI+3.0%Cu+SG+71.0% S Capacity (mAh / g) 462 578 619 557 528 494 455 407 Capacity retention (%) 80.0% 100.0 % 107.2 % 96.4 % 91.3 % 85.5 % 78.7 % 70.5 %

[0149] FIGS. 5-8 illustrate 500 cycle performance of LiS batteries with the baseline LAAC (LC21-27-5 and LC21-27-8) and FIGS. 9-12 illustrate 500 cycle performance of LiS batteries with 0.15%AI+3%Cu+SG LAAC (LC21-25-9 and LC21-25-10). FIGs. 7, 8, 11 and 12 each show an enlarged view of just the capacity retention for the first 50 cycles, i.e FIG. 7 shows show an enlarged view of just the capacity retention for the first 50 cycles of FIG. 5, FIG. 8 shows show an enlarged view of just the capacity retention for the first 50 cycles of FIG. 6, FIG. 11 shows show an enlarged view of just the capacity retention for the first 50 cycles of FIG. 9, and FIG. 12 shows show an enlarged view of just the capacity retention for the first 50 cycles of FIG. 10. FIGS. 5-8 show that the capacity and capacity retention of LiS batteries with the baseline (SG-treated LAAC, not metal doped) slightly increased in the first 50 cycles (maximum 4.3% increase for LC21-27-5 and gradually decrease for LC21-27-8) and constantly declined between 100th and 500th cycle. FIGS. 7-8 show the capacity retention of the baseline LiSBs in the first 50 cycles.

[0150] FIGS. 9-12 show that the capacity and capacity retention of LiS batteries with 0.15%AI+3%Cu+SG (LC21-25-9 and LC21-25-10) significantly increased in 50 cycles (maximum 8.2% increase based on the 2nd cycled capacity for LC21-25-9 and maximum 10.8% increase based on the 2nd cycled capacity for LC21-25-10) and then gradually declined between 100th and 500th cycle. FIGS. 11-12 show the capacity retention of LiS batteries with 0.15%AI and 3%Cu+SG in the first 50 cycles.

[0151] The results of testing LiS batteries fabricated with a 0.15%AI+3%Cu+SG cathode suggest that lithium polysulfides (polar) that are created (reduced) from the active sulphur in the cathode during the discharge mode of the LiSB effectively interacted in the doped and SG-treated LAAC and better trapped in the cathode than the baseline LiS battery (SG-treated LAAC cathode).

[0152] To summarize, the comparative results of LiS batteries with baseline and metal-doped and SG-LAAC shows that the capacity and capacity retention values of LiSBs were significantly improved when the LAAC was doped at 0.15% Al and 3%Cu and treated with sweeping gas.

[0153] While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are consistent with the broadest interpretation of the specification as a whole. References

[0154] The following references are of interest with respect to the subject matter described herein. Each of the following references is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. • Quach, Nguyen Khanh Nguyen et al. (2017) The Influence of the Activation Temperature on the Structural Properties of the Activated Carbon Xerogels and Their Electrochemical Performance, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 8308612, doi.org / 10.1155 / 2017 / 8308612.

Claims

2023326101   26 May 20261. A composition comprising activated carbon, an electro-stabilizing agent, and a wettability enhancing agent, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises copper and the wettability enhancing agent comprises aluminum, and wherein the activated5         carbon comprises an oxygen-stripped activated carbon.

2. A method of producing activated carbon, comprising:combining activated carbon with an electro-stabilizing agent and a wettability enhancing agent to form an activated carbon mixture; andexposing the activated carbon mixture to a sweeping gas at an elevated0                temperature, wherein the sweeping gas comprises a combination of an inertgas and a reducing gas.

3. A method of producing activated carbon, comprising:combining activated carbon with an electro-stabilizing agent and / or a wettability enhancing agent to form an activated carbon mixture; and15          exposing the activated carbon mixture to a sweeping gas at an elevatedtemperature, wherein the sweeping gas comprises a combination of an inert gas and a reducing gas;wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pb, Ag, La, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, or Ac.20   4. The method of claim 2 or 3, wherein the inert gas comprises nitrogen, argon orhelium; and wherein the reducing gas comprises hydrogen, ammonia, carbon monoxide, forming gas or syngas.

5. The method of any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the sweeping gas comprises between about 80% and about 98% of the inert gas and about 2% to about 20% of25          the reducing gas.

6. The method of any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein the elevated temperature is between about 750oC and about 950oC.

7. The method of any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein during the step of exposing the activated carbon to the sweeping gas, the sweeping gas is supplied at a flow rate of30         between 0.25 to 1.0 L / minute, and the sweeping gas is sprayed over or through theactivated carbon.2023326101   26 May 20268. The method of any one of claims 2 to 7, comprising drying the activated carbon mixture prior to the step of exposing the activated carbon mixture to the sweeping gas, or comprising micronizing the activated carbon prior to the step of exposing the activated carbon mixture to the sweeping gas.5   9. A composition made by the method of any one of claims 2 to 8.

10. The composition or method of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the electrostabilizing agent comprises a conductive metal, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises a transition metal, or wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pb, Ag, La, Hf, Ta, W, Re, 0           Os, Ir, Pt, Au, or Ac.

11. The method of any one of claims 2 to 8 or 10, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises copper or wherein the wettability enhancing agent comprises aluminum.

12. The method of any one of claims 2 to 8 or 10 to 11, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent comprises copper and wherein the wettability enhancing agent comprises 15         aluminum.

13. The composition or method of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein:the wettability enhancing agent comprises alumina or activated alumina (Y-AI2O3);the wettability enhancing agent comprises a compound that provides enhanced interactions between polar and non-polar substances; or20          the electro-stabilizing agent and the wettability enhancing agent are noncombustible.

14. The composition or method of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein:the electro-stabilizing agent is present in the composition in an amount of about 0.5% to about 4.0% by weight based on the elemental content of the electro-25                 stabilizing agent, optionally about 1% to about 3.5% by weight based on theelemental content of the electro-stabilizing agent;the wettability enhancing agent is present in the composition in an amount of about 0.15% to about 1.5% by weight based on the elemental content of the wettability enhancing agent, optionally about 0.45% to about 1.0% by weight30                 based on the elemental content of the wettability enhancing agent;2023326101   26 May 2026the activated carbon is produced from lignin, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent is present in an amount of between about 2.75% and 3.25% by weight, and wherein the wettability enhancing agent is present in an amount of between about 0.50% and 1.25% by weight; orthe activated carbon is produced from coconut husk, wherein the electro-stabilizing agent is present in an amount of between about 2.75% and 3.25% by weight, and wherein the wettability enhancing agent is present in an amount of between about 0.25% and 1.0% by weight.

15. The composition of any one of claims 1, 9 to 10 or 13 to 14, or a composition produced by the method any one of claims 2 to 8 or 10 to 14, wherein:the activated carbon is produced from lignin or a high lignin feedstock and has a BET surface area of at least 2500 m2 / g;the activated carbon has a pore volume of at least 1 cc / g which is predominantly micro-pores;15          the activated carbon is produced from lignin or a high lignin feedstock and has amean particle size of less than about 15 pm without micronization, or less than about 7 pm with micronization; and / orthe activated carbon has a bulk density of at least about 0.25 g / cc.

16. An activated carbon made by the method of any one of claims 2 to 8 or 10 to 14.20   17.   An electrode comprising the composition of any one of claims 1, 9 to 10 or 13 to 14or a composition made by the method of any one of claims 2 to 8 or 10 to 14.

18. A supercapacitor or battery comprising an electrode as defined in claim 17.

19. The supercapacitor or battery as defined in claim 18, wherein:the battery is a lithium sulphur battery and the electrode comprises activated carbon25                 comprising the electro-stabilizing agent at a concentration in the range ofabout 0.5% to about 3.5% by weight, and / or wherein the electrode comprises activated carbon comprising the wettability enhancing agent at a concentration in the range of about 0.1% to about 0.2% by weight; or the supercapacitor comprises an electrode that comprises activated carbon30comprising the electro-stabilizing agent at a concentration in the range of about 1% to about 3.5% by weight, and / or wherein the electrode comprises2023326101   26 May 2026activated carbon comprising the wettability enhancing agent at aconcentration in the range of about 0.45% to about 1.0% by weight.

20. A building or modular building component containing an energy storage system comprising a supercapacitor or battery comprising an electrode as defined in claim5          17, or containing an energy storage system comprising an activated carbon asdefined in claim 16.

Images