A method and platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation
The standard performance management platform with dynamic evaluation solves the problem of static evaluation being unable to be updated, and realizes dynamic updating and compliance supervision of evaluation data and performance data, ensuring the accuracy of evaluation results and consumer protection.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- 严东军
- Filing Date
- 2019-05-17
- Publication Date
- 2026-05-05
AI Technical Summary
The existing standard evaluation method is a static evaluation, which means that once the evaluation results are formed, they cannot be updated dynamically, and cannot reflect the subsequent performance of the evaluated customer, thus misleading consumers.
A standard performance management platform based on dynamic evaluation is adopted, including a standard release system, a standard evaluation management system, and a standard performance work system. The platform automatically judges the compliance of evaluation data and performance data through dynamic evaluation rules, generates dynamic evaluation results, and updates the evaluation result information in real time.
It enables dynamic updates of standard evaluation data and performance data for the evaluated clients, ensuring the accuracy and compliance of evaluation results, protecting consumer rights, and preventing outdated data from misleading consumers.
Smart Images

Figure CN110288373B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of evaluation management, and specifically to a method and platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation. Background Technology
[0002] Standards management throughout the entire process includes planning, design, drafting, revision, publication, implementation, and evaluation. Evaluation refers to the process by which evaluation bodies assess the compliance of clients with published standards. The significance of standards evaluation lies in regulating the behavior of evaluation bodies and ensuring their effective implementation of standards. Therefore, evaluation is a crucial component of standards management throughout the entire process.
[0003] Current standard evaluation primarily employs a static evaluation method. During standard evaluation and certification, the evaluating entity submits the required standard evaluation data to a specific standard evaluation system for evaluation. Once the evaluation is passed, a standard evaluation result is generated for the evaluating entity. However, once this result is generated, it is not dynamically updated. In other words, the existing standard evaluation system only reflects the evaluating entity's one-time standard evaluation result, and the data cannot be dynamically updated to reflect the dynamic implementation of the standard by the evaluating entity's clients. This means that clients may subsequently deviate from the standards, misleading consumers and negating the purpose of standard evaluation. Summary of the Invention
[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, in order to solve the problem that existing static evaluation methods generate standard evaluation results data but do not update them, resulting in the inability to know whether the evaluated client has subsequently implemented the standard.
[0005] The basic solution provided by this invention is: a platform for standard compliance management based on dynamic evaluation, comprising: a standard release system, a standard evaluation management system, and a standard compliance work system;
[0006] The standard publishing system is used by standard evaluation units to input standard content, standard evaluation requirements, standard dynamic evaluation requirements, and standard dynamic evaluation rules.
[0007] The standard evaluation management system is used to submit standard evaluation data according to the standard content and standard evaluation requirements. The standard evaluation management system is also used to determine the compliance of the corresponding standard evaluation data according to the standard content and standard evaluation requirements, obtain standard evaluation result data, store it, and send it to the standard performance system of the evaluation subject; then, it generates an evaluation digital identifier QR code based on the standard evaluation result data and sends it to the evaluation subject's customers for viewing.
[0008] The standard performance work system is used by the evaluation entity customer to view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules, and to submit dynamic performance execution data according to the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules;
[0009] The standard evaluation management system is also used to automatically determine the compliance of dynamic performance execution data according to dynamic evaluation rules, and then generate dynamic evaluation result information and send it to the standard performance work system; after that, the latest dynamic evaluation result information is automatically updated to the information recorded in the evaluation digital identifier QR code.
[0010] The advantages of this invention are:
[0011] 1. This solution uses a dynamic evaluation method to replace the existing static evaluation method, which enables the standard evaluation data of the evaluated customers to be updated dynamically. At the same time, the standard evaluation management system will automatically judge the compliance of the standard evaluation data and the dynamic performance execution data, avoiding the problem of low accuracy of newly added standard evaluation data and dynamic performance execution data, and realizing compliance supervision of standard evaluation data and dynamic performance execution data.
[0012] 2. Customers can view dynamic evaluation results by scanning the QR code of the evaluation number. This allows consumers to monitor whether customers are consistently implementing the standards and ensures that consumers see the latest dynamic evaluation results, avoiding misleading consumers with outdated standard evaluation data.
[0013] Furthermore, the standard release system, standard evaluation management system, and standard implementation system consist of an evaluation subject client terminal, a standard evaluation unit terminal, a server, an evaluation result data storage terminal, and a dynamic implementation data storage terminal. The evaluation result data storage terminal is used to store evaluation result data, and the dynamic implementation data storage terminal is used to store dynamic implementation data.
[0014] This solution stores evaluation results data and dynamic performance data separately to facilitate separate management of the two.
[0015] Furthermore, the dynamic performance execution data storage terminal is equipped with a dynamic performance execution data storage space with a warehouse, stack, and grid space structure, and the dynamic performance execution data is stored in the dynamic performance execution data storage space.
[0016] It has a dynamic performance execution data storage space with a warehouse, stack, and grid space structure, which facilitates the storage and management of dynamic performance execution data.
[0017] Furthermore, the standard evaluation management system is also associated with a black box, which is used to decrypt the standard evaluation data submitted by the evaluation subject and encrypt the sent standard evaluation result data and dynamic evaluation result information.
[0018] This solution encrypts the dynamic evaluation results information to ensure its compliance and prevent others from modifying it.
[0019] In addition to the aforementioned platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, a method for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation is also disclosed, comprising the following steps:
[0020] S1. The client submits standard evaluation data, and the standard evaluation management system automatically judges the compliance of the submitted standard evaluation data, obtains the standard evaluation result data, and then generates an evaluation digital identifier QR code for recording the standard evaluation result data.
[0021] S2: The client being evaluated enters dynamic performance data according to the standard dynamic evaluation rules entered by the standard evaluation unit. The standard evaluation management system judges the compliance of the entered dynamic performance data according to the standard dynamic evaluation rules and generates corresponding dynamic evaluation result information. Then, the dynamic evaluation result information is automatically updated to the information recorded in the corresponding evaluation digital identification QR code.
[0022] Compared with existing technologies, this solution adopts a dynamic evaluation method, which enables the recorded dynamic performance data to be judged for compliance in real time and outputs dynamic evaluation results in real time. This allows consumers to judge whether the evaluated client has been continuously implementing the standards based on the dynamic evaluation results, effectively protecting consumers' rights.
[0023] Furthermore, in step S1, when judging the compliance of the standard evaluation data, it automatically judges whether the evaluation subject has fully implemented the conditions set by the standard evaluation requirements and whether the implementation is correct.
[0024] It automatically determines whether the evaluation subject has fully and correctly implemented the conditions set by the standard evaluation requirements, without the need for manual judgment, and is easy to use.
[0025] Furthermore, in step S2, when judging the compliance of dynamic performance execution data, it automatically judges whether the evaluation subject has fully executed the conditions set by the dynamic evaluation rules and whether the execution is correct.
[0026] This solution automatically determines whether the evaluation subject has fully and correctly executed the conditions set by the dynamic evaluation rules, eliminating the need for manual judgment and making it easy to use. Attached Figure Description
[0027] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the standard evaluation procedure in Embodiment 1 of the present invention;
[0028] Figure 2This is a schematic diagram of the standard dynamic evaluation procedure in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. Detailed Implementation
[0029] The following detailed description illustrates the specific implementation method:
[0030] Example 1
[0031] A platform for standards compliance management based on dynamic evaluation includes a standards compliance work system, a standards evaluation management system, and a standards publication system. Data is interconnected between the standards compliance work system, the standards evaluation management system, and the standards publication system.
[0032] The standard publishing system is used by standard evaluation units to input standard content, standard evaluation requirements, and dynamic standard evaluation requirements, and then publish all the input information. Afterwards, the evaluation entity / client views the standard content and evaluation requirements through the standard evaluation management system and submits standard evaluation data accordingly. Simultaneously, the standard publishing system automatically determines the compliance of the corresponding standard evaluation data based on the standard content and evaluation requirements, generates standard evaluation results data, sends it to the evaluation entity's standard compliance system, and stores the evaluation results data in the corresponding evaluation results data storage space. When storing the evaluation results data in the storage space, a dynamic compliance execution data storage space with a warehouse, stack, and grid space structure must first be built, and then the evaluation results data is stored according to pre-stored input rules.
[0033] After the evaluation results data is stored in the storage space, the standard evaluation management system generates an evaluation digital identifier QR code based on the standard evaluation results data and its URI, and sends it to the evaluation subject client. Then, the standard evaluation unit logs into the standard evaluation management system, views the standard dynamic evaluation requirements, and enters the standard dynamic evaluation rules after calling the standard dynamic evaluation rule engine. Afterwards, the evaluation subject client logs into the standard performance work system to view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and rules, and submits dynamic performance execution data to the dynamic performance execution data storage space according to the requirements and rules. Subsequently, the standard evaluation management system extracts the storage status data of the warehouse, stack, and grid of the dynamic performance execution data through the standard dynamic evaluation rule engine, analyzes the compliance of the dynamic performance execution data, and automatically determines whether the evaluation subject has fully and correctly executed the requirements corresponding to the conditions set by the dynamic evaluation rules. This dynamic evaluation result information is then sent to the evaluation subject's standard performance work system and the evaluation results data storage space. At this point, the evaluation subject client can view the dynamic evaluation result information. The dynamic evaluation result information uses the same URI as the standard evaluation results data, and the latest dynamic evaluation result information is automatically updated in the information recorded in the evaluation digital identifier QR code.
[0034] In addition, the standard evaluation management system is also associated with a black box, which is used to decrypt the standard evaluation data submitted by the evaluation subject and encrypt the standard evaluation result data and dynamic evaluation result information sent.
[0035] In practice, the hardware components of the standard implementation system, standard evaluation management system, and standard release system include: evaluation subject client terminals, standard evaluation unit terminals, servers, evaluation result data storage terminals, and dynamic implementation data storage terminals.
[0036] I. Evaluation Subject: Customer Terminal
[0037] The main customer terminals for evaluation include:
[0038] The registration and login module is used for evaluating the registration and login of main clients to the standard performance work system.
[0039] The standard evaluation module allows the client to select the standard to be evaluated, view the corresponding standard content and evaluation requirements, and then fill in and submit the standard evaluation data according to the requirements. The standard content and evaluation requirements are obtained from the standard publication system, which is linked to a platform for standard compliance management based on dynamic evaluation.
[0040] The information viewing module is used by the client to view the standard evaluation result data and the evaluation digital identifier QR code sent by the standard evaluation unit's terminal.
[0041] The dynamic performance execution data entry module is used by the evaluation entity customer to view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules, and submit dynamic performance execution data according to the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules. Then, the dynamic performance execution data is stored in the dynamic performance execution data storage space.
[0042] II. Standard Evaluation Unit Terminal
[0043] Standard evaluation unit terminals include:
[0044] The registration and login module is used for standard evaluation units to register and log in to the standard evaluation management system and the standard evaluation management system.
[0045] The data entry module is used by standard evaluation units to enter standard content, standard evaluation requirements, and standard dynamic evaluation requirements through the standard evaluation management system.
[0046] The standard evaluation data acquisition module is used by standard evaluation units to obtain standard evaluation data submitted by evaluation subjects and clients. After obtaining the standard evaluation data submitted by evaluation subjects and clients, it displays the corresponding standard content and standard evaluation requirements for standard evaluation units to view. At the same time, the standard evaluation data acquisition module is also used to automatically determine the compliance of the corresponding standard evaluation data based on the standard content and standard evaluation requirements, perform standard evaluation, and send the standard evaluation result data to the server, the evaluation subject client terminal, and the evaluation result data storage terminal.
[0047] The Standard Dynamic Evaluation Rule Input Module is used by standard evaluation units to view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements, and then input the standard dynamic evaluation rules after calling the standard dynamic evaluation rule engine.
[0048] The dynamic performance execution data analysis module is used by standard evaluation units to extract the storage status data of the warehouse, stack, and grid of dynamic performance execution data through the standard dynamic evaluation rule engine, analyze the compliance of the dynamic performance execution data, automatically determine whether the evaluation subject has fully executed the conditions set by the dynamic evaluation rules and whether the execution is correct, and send the dynamic evaluation result information to the standard performance work system and evaluation result data storage space of the evaluation subject.
[0049] III. Server
[0050] The servers include:
[0051] The evaluation result data storage module is used to allocate a dedicated standard performance data management cloud space (hereinafter referred to as cloud space) to the evaluation subject based on the standard evaluation result data. The cloud space consists of an evaluation result data storage space and a dynamic performance execution data storage space. The standard evaluation result data is stored in the evaluation result data storage space, and the dynamic performance execution data is stored in the dynamic performance execution data storage space.
[0052] The evaluation digital identifier QR code generation module is used to generate an evaluation digital identifier QR code based on the standard evaluation result data and its URI, and send the evaluation data identifier QR code to the evaluation subject's client terminal.
[0053] IV. Evaluation Result Data Storage Terminal
[0054] The evaluation result data storage terminals include:
[0055] The evaluation result data storage module is used to store the evaluation result data. When storing, it is necessary to first build a dynamic performance execution data storage space with a backup warehouse, stack, and grid space structure, and then store the evaluation result data according to the pre-stored entry rules.
[0056] V. Dynamic Performance Execution Data Storage Terminal
[0057] The dynamic performance execution data storage terminal is equipped with a dynamic performance execution data storage space for storing dynamic performance execution data.
[0058] In addition, such as Figure 1 and Figure 2 As shown, for the aforementioned platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, this embodiment also provides a method for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, including the following steps:
[0059] S1, Standard Evaluation
[0060] S1-1: The evaluation subject client logs into the standard performance work system through the registration and login module of the evaluation subject client terminal;
[0061] S1-2: Enter the standard evaluation module;
[0062] S1-3: Evaluation criteria for selecting clients;
[0063] S1-4: The standard evaluation module displays the corresponding standard content and standard evaluation requirements based on the standard selected by the evaluation subject client;
[0064] S1-5: The client being evaluated submits standard evaluation data according to the standard content and standard evaluation requirements;
[0065] S1-6: Standard evaluation units log in to the standard evaluation management system;
[0066] S1-7: The standard evaluation unit obtains the standard evaluation data submitted by the evaluation subject client through the standard evaluation data acquisition module;
[0067] S1-8: The standard evaluation management system determines the compliance of the standard evaluation data based on the obtained standard content and standard evaluation requirements, and sends the standard evaluation result data to the server, the evaluation subject's client terminal, and the evaluation result data storage terminal;
[0068] S1-9: The client terminal of the evaluation entity displays the standard evaluation result data;
[0069] S1-10: The server and evaluation result data storage terminal store the standard evaluation result data;
[0070] S1-11: Generate a corresponding evaluation digital identifier QR code based on the standard evaluation result data in the evaluation result data storage terminal;
[0071] S1-12: Users can view the QR code of the evaluation number through the information viewing module in the evaluation result data terminal.
[0072] S2, Standard Dynamic Evaluation
[0073] S2-1: Standard evaluation units log in to the standard evaluation management system through the registration and login module in the standard evaluation unit terminal;
[0074] S2-2: Standard evaluation units can view the dynamic evaluation requirements of the standard through the standard dynamic evaluation rule input module;
[0075] S2-3: Standard evaluation units call the standard dynamic evaluation rule engine through the standard dynamic evaluation rule input module;
[0076] S2-4: Standard evaluation units enter standard dynamic evaluation rules through the standard dynamic evaluation rule input module;
[0077] S2-5: The evaluation subject customer logs into the standard performance work system through the registration and login module of the evaluation subject customer terminal;
[0078] S2-6: The client being evaluated can view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements through the dynamic performance data entry module;
[0079] S2-7: The client being evaluated submits dynamic performance execution data through the dynamic performance execution data entry module, and then sends the dynamic performance execution data to the dynamic performance execution data storage space;
[0080] S2-8: Dynamic performance execution data storage space stores dynamic performance execution data;
[0081] S2-9: The standard evaluation unit extracts the dynamic performance execution data in the storage state through the dynamic performance execution data analysis module;
[0082] S1-10: The dynamic performance data analysis module automatically determines the compliance of dynamic performance data based on standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules;
[0083] S1-10: The dynamic performance execution data analysis module automatically generates dynamic evaluation results based on the assessed compliance.
[0084] S1-11: The dynamic performance execution data analysis module sends the dynamic evaluation result information to the standard performance work system and evaluation result data storage space of the evaluation subject. At the same time, the latest dynamic evaluation result information is automatically updated to the information recorded in the evaluation digital identifier QR code.
[0085] Example 2
[0086] The difference between Example 2 and Example 1 is that the platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation in Example 2 also includes an evaluation authenticity judgment system, and data connection between the evaluation authenticity judgment system, the standard performance work system, the standard evaluation management system, and the standard release system.
[0087] The authenticity assessment system includes: an information collection terminal, an evaluation subject's client terminal, and a server; both the information collection terminal and the evaluation subject's client terminal communicate with the server via a wireless communication module. In this solution, the information collection terminal can be a microphone added to an existing UMO brand smart heart rate monitoring wristband to enable voice input from the evaluation subject's client.
[0088] The information collection terminal includes:
[0089] The voice acquisition module is used to collect the voice of the customer making a standard evaluation and send the collected voice information to the server.
[0090] The heart rate acquisition module is used to collect the heart rate of the customer being evaluated during the standard evaluation and send the collected heart rate information to the server.
[0091] The servers include:
[0092] The keyword extraction and storage module stores the keyword crawling model. This model stores words representing human emotions. During storage, keywords are categorized by emotion type: good mood, bad mood, and stable mood. For example, keywords representing a good mood include words like "happy," "joyful," "happy," and "sunny," indicating positive emotions; keywords representing a bad mood include words like "sad," "angry," "disappointed," "hurt," and "depressed," indicating negative emotions; and keywords representing a stable mood include words like "neutral," "okay," and "good," indicating a calm mood.
[0093] The evaluation subject information acquisition module is used to associate with the evaluation subject's chat tools such as WeChat and Tencent QQ. On the day the evaluation subject marks the evaluation, it extracts the corresponding keywords from the chat tools when the evaluation subject chats with others on that day based on the keywords in the keyword extraction model, and sends the extracted keywords to the sentiment analysis module for the evaluation day.
[0094] The daily sentiment analysis module analyzes keywords extracted by the reviewer information acquisition module. Based on the keyword extraction model, it determines the type of emotion the keyword represents for the reviewer that day. To determine the reviewer's mood, it first counts the number of times keywords representing that emotion are extracted, then identifies the most frequently extracted emotion type as the reviewer's mood for that day. If the number of extracted negative emotion-related keywords equals the number of positive emotion-related keywords, or if only keywords indicating stable emotions are extracted, the reviewer's mood for that day is considered stable. If the number of extracted negative emotion-related keywords is less than the number of extracted positive emotion-related keywords, the reviewer's mood for that day is considered good. If the number of extracted negative emotion-related keywords is greater than the number of extracted positive emotion-related keywords, the reviewer's mood for that day is considered bad.
[0095] The evaluation-time emotion analysis module is used to determine the emotional state of the evaluation subject customer when making a standard evaluation based on the voice information and heart rate information sent by the information collection terminal. When analyzing the emotional state of the evaluation subject customer when making a standard evaluation, it first uses existing emotion analysis methods (such as the intelligent emotion analysis method disclosed in the patent document with publication number CN107714056A) to analyze the emotions expressed by the voice information and heart rate information, and determines the current emotional state of the evaluation subject customer. If the current emotional state of the evaluation subject customer is negative, the customer's emotion is judged as being in a bad mood. If the current emotional state of the evaluation subject customer is positive, the customer's emotion is judged as being in a good mood. If it is impossible to determine whether the current emotional state of the evaluation subject customer is positive or negative, the customer's emotion is judged as being stable.
[0096] The evaluation information accuracy analysis module is used to analyze the impact of the customer's emotional state on the objectivity of the evaluation information when making a standard evaluation, that is, to determine the authenticity of the evaluation information provided by the customer. When analyzing the objectivity of the evaluation information, firstly, the number of keywords for "good mood" and "bad mood" captured by the emotion analysis module on the day of the evaluation is counted. The more keywords, the lower the authenticity of the evaluation information. In this solution, the maximum authenticity of the evaluation information is 100%. For every 5 additional emotion keywords, the authenticity of the evaluation information decreases by 5%. Then, it is determined whether the customer's emotional state on the day of the evaluation is consistent with their current emotional state when making the standard evaluation. If they are consistent and both are of the "bad mood" or "good mood" type, the authenticity of the evaluation information submitted by the customer is further reduced by 10%. If the customer's emotional state on the day of the evaluation is consistent with their current emotional state when making the standard evaluation and is considered emotionally stable, the authenticity of the customer's evaluation information increases by 10%. When the customer's emotional state on the day of the evaluation is inconsistent with their state when making the standard evaluation, the authenticity of the customer's evaluation information increases by 10%. In addition, the evaluation information in this embodiment includes dynamic evaluation result information and standard evaluation result data.
[0097] In practice, since people tend to evaluate things more positively when they are in a good mood and more negatively when they are in a bad mood, this solution compares the user's emotional state on the day of evaluation with their current evaluation state when making the standard evaluation. It then determines whether the user's emotional state on the day influenced their current evaluation state when making the standard evaluation. If the user's emotional state on the day of evaluation matches their current evaluation state when making the standard evaluation, it's possible that their emotional state on the day of evaluation influenced their emotional state when making the standard evaluation, thus affecting the authenticity of the evaluation information. Similarly, if the user's emotional state on the day of evaluation does not match their current evaluation state when making the standard evaluation, the likelihood of their emotional state being influenced by other factors is lower, and the authenticity of the user's evaluation information is higher. Furthermore, the more stable the user's mood on the day of evaluation, the fewer keywords related to the two emotion types (good mood and bad mood) will be captured by the emotion analysis module, and the lower the likelihood that the authenticity of the evaluation result information is influenced by emotions. Judging the authenticity of evaluation information makes it easier for others to determine whether the evaluation information is credible based on the results of the authenticity judgment.
[0098] The above descriptions are merely embodiments of the present invention. Commonly known structures and characteristics are not described in detail here. Those skilled in the art are aware of all common technical knowledge in the field prior to the application date or priority date, are aware of all existing technologies in that field, and have the ability to apply conventional experimental methods prior to that date. Those skilled in the art can, under the guidance of this application, improve and implement this solution in combination with their own capabilities. Some typical known structures or methods should not be obstacles for those skilled in the art to implement this application. It should be noted that those skilled in the art can make several modifications and improvements without departing from the structure of the present invention. These should also be considered within the scope of protection of the present invention, and will not affect the effectiveness of the implementation of the present invention or the practicality of the patent. The scope of protection claimed in this application should be determined by the content of its claims, and the specific embodiments described in the specification can be used to interpret the content of the claims.
Claims
1. A platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, characterized in that: include: Standards release system, standards evaluation and management system, and standards implementation system; The standard publishing system is used by standard evaluation units to input standard content, standard evaluation requirements, standard dynamic evaluation requirements, and standard dynamic evaluation rules. The standard evaluation management system is used to submit standard evaluation data according to the standard content and standard evaluation requirements. The standard evaluation management system is also used to determine the compliance of the corresponding standard evaluation data according to the standard content and standard evaluation requirements, obtain standard evaluation result data, store it, and send it to the standard performance system of the evaluation subject; then, it generates an evaluation digital identifier QR code based on the standard evaluation result data and sends it to the evaluation subject's customers for viewing. The standard performance work system is used by the evaluation entity customer to view the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules, and to submit dynamic performance execution data according to the standard dynamic evaluation requirements and standard dynamic evaluation rules; The standard evaluation management system is also used to automatically determine the compliance of dynamic performance execution data according to dynamic evaluation rules, and then generate dynamic evaluation result information and send it to the standard performance work system; after that, it automatically updates the latest dynamic evaluation result information to the information recorded in the evaluation digital identifier QR code; The standard release system, standard evaluation management system, and standard implementation system consist of an evaluation subject client terminal, a standard evaluation unit terminal, a server, an evaluation result data storage terminal, and a dynamic implementation data storage terminal. The evaluation result data storage terminal is used to store standard evaluation result data, and the dynamic implementation data storage terminal is used to store dynamic implementation data. The servers include: The keyword extraction and storage module is used to store the keyword crawling model. The keyword crawling model stores words that represent human emotions. When storing, the keywords are stored according to the emotion type, which includes three types: good mood, bad mood, and stable mood. The evaluation subject information acquisition module is used to associate with the evaluation subject's chat tools, including WeChat and Tencent QQ. On the day the evaluation subject marks the evaluation, it extracts the corresponding keywords from the chat tools when the evaluation subject chats with others on that day based on the keywords in the keyword extraction model, and sends the extracted keywords to the sentiment analysis module for the evaluation day. The daily sentiment analysis module is used to statistically analyze the keywords extracted by the evaluation subject information acquisition module. Based on the keyword capture model, it determines which type of emotion the keyword represents for the evaluation subject customer on that day. When determining the evaluation subject customer's emotion on that day, it first counts the number of times the keyword representing that emotion is captured, and then determines the emotion type with the most counts as the evaluation subject customer's emotional state on that day. The evaluation moment emotion analysis module is used to determine the emotional state of the customer making a standard evaluation based on the voice information and heart rate information sent by the information collection terminal. The evaluation information accuracy analysis module is used to analyze the impact of the emotional state of the customer being evaluated on the objectivity of the evaluation information.
2. The platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation according to claim 1, characterized in that: The dynamic performance execution data storage terminal is equipped with a dynamic performance execution data storage space with a warehouse, stack, and grid space structure, and the dynamic performance execution data is stored in the dynamic performance execution data storage space.
3. The platform for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation according to any one of claims 1-2, characterized in that: The standard evaluation management system is also associated with a black box, which is used to decrypt the standard evaluation data submitted by the evaluation subject and encrypt the sent standard evaluation result data and dynamic evaluation result information.
4. A method for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation, characterized in that, The platform described in claim 1 includes the following steps: S1. The client submits standard evaluation data, and the standard evaluation management system automatically judges the compliance of the submitted standard evaluation data, obtains the standard evaluation result data, and then generates an evaluation digital identifier QR code for recording the standard evaluation result data. S2: The client being evaluated enters dynamic performance data according to the standard dynamic evaluation rules entered by the standard evaluation unit. The standard evaluation management system judges the compliance of the entered dynamic performance data according to the standard dynamic evaluation rules and generates corresponding dynamic evaluation result information. Then, the dynamic evaluation result information is automatically updated to the information recorded in the corresponding evaluation digital identification QR code.
5. The standard performance management method based on dynamic evaluation according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step S1, when judging the compliance of the standard evaluation data, the system automatically determines whether the evaluation subject has fully implemented the conditions set by the standard evaluation requirements and whether the implementation is correct.
6. The method for standard performance management based on dynamic evaluation according to claim 4 or 5, characterized in that: In step S2, when judging the compliance of dynamic performance data, the system automatically determines whether the evaluation subject has fully executed the conditions set by the dynamic evaluation rules and whether the execution is correct.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Wearable device for intelligently analyzing emotions and method for intelligently analyzing emotions
CN107714056A
Objective dynamic credit rating method and platform based on subjective integrity consciousness
CN106875132A
Cosmetic licensing responsibility performance monitoring platform and method
CN108197951A
Method for tracking device information by utilizing two-dimensional code technology
CN108388592A