Method and device for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization

Abstract

The present invention provides a method and device for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations, including constructing a first server to collect multiple organizations and their set standards to obtain analysis information; constructing a second server to use the organization input by the client as an evaluation object, and analyzing the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through analysis information. The above analysis method and device solve the problem of quantitatively representing the influence of standards of different organizations.

Description

[0001] This invention claims priority to Chinese patent application No. 202011047155.2, filed on September 29, 2020, entitled “Method and system for evaluating standard influence based on harmony”, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Technical Field

[0002] The present invention relates to the technical field of big data analysis, and more specifically, to a method and device for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations. Background Art

[0003] Standards have become the world's "common language". Under the current trend of economic globalization, the maturity of the standardization system is the key to occupying a favorable position in international trade. At present, my country's standardization work has made certain breakthroughs, but it still lags behind most developed countries and has weak internationalization capabilities for standards. The greater the influence of standardization in a country, the stronger its guiding role in the standards of other countries, which is more conducive to occupying a favorable position in import and export trade.

[0004] With the gradual improvement of domestic and international standardization systems and the increasing frequency of trade under economic globalization, the use of technical trade measures based on technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedures also plays an important role in economic activities. Naturally, countries with a greater degree of influence on standards can take the initiative in this regard.

[0005] In the prior art, there is no analysis of the adoption relationship between multiple standards in different countries, nor is there an objective analysis of the degree of influence between different countries through the standard adoption relationship. Summary of the invention

[0006] In view of the above problems, the present invention provides a method, system, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium for analyzing the influence of standards adoption relationships on organizations, which objectively analyzes the influence of standards between different countries through standards adoption relationships.

[0007] According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for analyzing the impact of standard adoption relationships on an organization is provided, comprising:

[0008] Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0009] Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0010] Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0011] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoptions, the current average time of adoptions, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is I The ratio of the number of DTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of adoption of obsolete standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization is the average value from the publication time to the time of obsolete standards; the current average adoption time is the average value from the publication time to the evaluation time of the first standards that have not been obsolete in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with the first standard; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object;

[0012] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0013] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0014] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0015] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0016] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level pThe harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0017] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0018] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0019] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0020] Optionally, the step of dividing the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values ​​includes:

[0021] The natural break point method is used to determine the critical values ​​of each analysis indicator and each evaluation level.

[0022] Optionally, the step of determining the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator includes:

[0023] The entropy method is used to determine the weight of each analysis indicator.

[0024] Optionally, the step of using the entropy method to determine the weight of each analysis indicator includes:

[0025] Obtain indicator values ​​of multiple analytical indicators of multiple other organizations;

[0026] Normalize the indicator values ​​of multiple analysis indicators;

[0027] Obtain the ratio of the index value of an analytical index of another organization to the sum of the index values ​​of the analytical index of all standards

[0028]

[0029] Among them, g is the index of other organizations, q is the index of analysis indicators, and x is gq is the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization, n is the total number of other organizations, p gq is the weight of the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization;

[0030] The entropy value of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula:

[0031]

[0032] Where K = 1 / ln(n), e qis the entropy value of the qth analysis index, satisfying e q ≥0;

[0033] The information entropy redundancy of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula

[0034] d q =1-e q

[0035] Among them, d q is the information entropy redundancy of the qth analysis indicator;

[0036] The weight of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula:

[0037]

[0038] Among them, m is the total number of analysis indicators, w q is the weight of the qth analysis indicator,

[0039] Optionally, the step of determining the degree of membership of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level by the indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object includes:

[0040] Set the standard range for each evaluation level;

[0041] The standard range of the indicator value of each analysis indicator is determined, and the indicator value is divided by the degree of membership of the evaluation level corresponding to the analysis indicator in the standard range.

[0042] According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relations on an organization, comprising:

[0043] Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0044] Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0045] Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0046] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the average time of adoption to be abolished, the current average time of adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with a second standard, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the average time of adoption to be abolished is the average of the time from publication to the time of abandonment of the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the current average time of adoption is the average of the time from publication to the time of evaluation of the first standard that has not been abolished in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of a second standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluation object;

[0047] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0048] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0049] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0050] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0051] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0052] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0053] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0054] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels obtains the influence degree of a second standard on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the second standard on the evaluation object is.

[0055] According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relations on an organization, comprising:

[0056] Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0057] Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0058] Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0059] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoption, the average time of current adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions of a second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of the second standard of another organization with which it has an adoption relationship;

[0060] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0061] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0062] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0063] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0064] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x qThe corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0065] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0066] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0067] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0068] According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relations on an organization, comprising:

[0069] The first server collects multiple organizations and the standards they set to obtain analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of the multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0070] The second server receives the organization input by the client, takes the organization input by the client as an evaluation object, calls analysis information of the evaluation object from the first server, and analyzes the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information, including:

[0071] A standard division module, which obtains a plurality of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and uses the standard in the evaluation object as the first standard and the standards in the other organizations as the second standard;

[0072] An indicator construction module is used to construct analysis indicators, wherein the analysis indicators include a plurality of the following: the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of adoption to be abolished, the average time of current adoption, the average time of conversion and the conversion speed index. The number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio The rate is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of obsolescence adoption is the average value of the obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the obsolescence time; the current average adoption time is the average value of the non-obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the evaluation time; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with it; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object;

[0073] The level division module divides the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0074] A membership degree obtaining module, which obtains an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determines the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0075] The first harmony degree acquisition module determines the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level through the following formula:

[0076] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0077] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0078] A weight acquisition module determines the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator;

[0079] The second harmony degree acquisition module obtains the harmony degree of each evaluation level by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0080] The influence degree analysis module combines the harmony of multiple evaluation levels to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0081] According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations, and when the program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations are implemented.

[0082] According to the sixth aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium includes a program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations, and when the program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-mentioned method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations are implemented.

[0083] The above-mentioned standard adopts the method, system, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium for analyzing the degree of influence of relationships on organizations to solve the problem of quantitatively representing the degree of influence of standards of different organizations, thereby solving the problem of which organizations specifically influence the evaluation object in the formulation of standards in various industries and presenting this degree of influence in a digital form, making subsequent analysis more scientific and reliable, that is, being able to objectively analyze the degree of influence of other organizations on the evaluation object. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0084] Figure 1 is a flow chart of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on an organization according to the present invention;

[0085] Figure 2 The relationship between the level of influence and the number of adoptions for each other organization;

[0086] Figure 3 The relationship between the influence of other organizations and the number of fields covered;

[0087] Figure 4 is the relationship between the influence of each other organization and the number of IDTs;

[0088] Figure 5 and Figure 6 Visualization results for ISO key adopted areas;

[0089] Figure 7 and Figure 8 These are visualization results of key adoption areas for IEC and the United States;

[0090] Fig. 9 It is a structural block diagram of the system for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to the present invention;

[0091] Fig.10 It is a block diagram of the electronic device described in the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0092] In the following description, for the purpose of illustration, in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of one or more embodiments, many specific details are set forth. However, it is apparent that these embodiments may also be implemented without these specific details. In other examples, for ease of describing one or more embodiments, known structures and devices are shown in the form of block diagrams.

[0093] Various embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0094] Figure 1 is a flow chart of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to the present invention, such as Figure 1 As shown, the standard adopts the following methods to analyze the degree of influence of relationships on organizations:

[0095] Step S1, construct a first server, collect multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtain analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations.

[0096] Step S2, constructing a second server, taking the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyzing the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0097] Step S21, through the analysis information collected by the first server, multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object are obtained, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in other organizations are used as the second standard. For example, China is taken as the evaluation object, the first standard is the national standard, and 15 countries and standardization organizations that have a standard adoption relationship with my country: ISO, IEC, the United States, EN, Turkey, Japan, Germany, OECD, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, Canada, Australia, Italy and Spain are taken as other organizations.

[0098] Step S22, constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoptions, the current average time of adoptions, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio The rate is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of obsolescence adoption is the average of the obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the obsolescence time; the current average adoption time is the average of the non-obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the evaluation time; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization with which it has an adoption relationship; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object.

[0099] Step S23, divide the analysis index of the impact degree into multiple evaluation levels. The index value of the analysis index of the impact degree can be obtained through the standard document metadata. The standard document metadata is the data source for the quantitative analysis of the standard impact degree, which contains 14 fields such as standard name, release date, abolition date, and adopted standard. Multiple evaluation levels can be divided according to the data segment of the index value. Assuming that X represents the analysis index set and m is the number of analysis indicators, the analysis indicators can represent x1, x2, ..., x m Assuming that Y represents the evaluation level set and k is the number of evaluation levels, the evaluation levels can be expressed as y1, y2, ..., y k , the standards are arranged in order of merit, which refers to the level of grade. For example, the grade of y1 is higher than that of y2. For positive analysis indicators, the larger the value, the higher the grade. For negative analysis indicators (for example, the average time to abandonment), the larger the value, the lower the grade. q ,y p ) is used to represent the value range of the pth evaluation grade standard corresponding to the kth analysis indicator. The specific form is shown in the following table:

[0100] Table 1

[0101]

[0102] Step 24, obtaining the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object. For example, assuming that the index value set of an evaluation object is: X = (x1, x2, ..., x m ), m is the total number of analysis indicators. Select each indicator value in X one by one, and divide the category membership according to the evaluation grade standard corresponding to the analysis indicator in the above table. If the indicator value of the analysis indicator is the maximum value within the corresponding evaluation grade standard range, it is marked as 1 at that place (proving that this analysis indicator completely belongs to this type of evaluation grade). At the same time, all grades inferior to this evaluation grade are also marked as 1 (that is, this indicator value also satisfies the evaluation grade lower than it). If the indicator value does not fall within a certain evaluation grade standard range, it is marked as 0, and so on, until the category membership of the evaluation grades corresponding to all indicator values ​​is divided. At this time, an m-row and k-column membership matrix will be obtained, referred to as the A matrix. It is denoted as:

[0103]

[0104] Step S25, determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level by the following formula:

[0105] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0106] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree. Preferably, a=a qp , the unity degree is used to indicate the proportion of harmonious participants who have the “same goal” according to the harmony rules; b is the divergence parameter, b=1-a, indicating the proportion of harmonious participants who have divergences in comparison with the harmony rules and goals; i is the harmony coefficient, reflecting the degree of satisfaction of the harmony goal; j is the disharmony coefficient, reflecting the degree of attention paid by harmonious participants to the divergent phenomenon. The larger the HD is, the more an evaluation object belongs to a certain evaluation level.

[0107] Step S26, determining the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator (the amount of information can be represented by information entropy redundancy), assuming that x is a vector composed of the observed values ​​of a certain analysis indicator, the greater the difference between the values ​​of each element in the vector, the higher the weight assigned to x; if the elements in x are the same, then the analysis indicator has no effect on the comprehensive evaluation, that is, the weight is 0;

[0108] Step S27, obtaining the harmony degree of each evaluation level by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level

[0109]

[0110] Among them, HD(y p ) is the evaluation level y p The harmony of q Represents the weight of the qth analysis indicator, and the HD vector of a single evaluation object can be obtained: (HD(y1), HD(y2), ..., HD(y m )).

[0111] Step S28, the harmony degree of multiple evaluation levels is combined to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0112]

[0113] Among them, K is the total number of evaluation levels, and Score is the degree of influence on the evaluation object.

[0114] The above-mentioned method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations quantifies the influence between different organizations through standard adoption relationships, and can quantify the influence of other organizations on my country's standards.

[0115] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in step S22, the analysis indicator system is constructed to classify the analysis indicators by level, for example, the first-level analysis indicator is other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object, the second-level analysis indicator is adoption intensity, adoption breadth, adoption validity, adoption viscosity and conversion speed, and the third-level analysis indicator is adoption quantity, field coverage number, field ratio, IDT quantity, IDT ratio, average adoption time of obsolete, current average adoption time and conversion speed index, wherein the adoption intensity includes the adoption quantity, the adoption breadth includes the field coverage number and the field ratio, the adoption validity includes the IDT quantity and the IDT ratio, the adoption viscosity includes the average adoption time of obsolete and the current average adoption time, and the conversion speed includes the conversion speed index, specifically, as shown in Tables 2 and 3 below:

[0116] Table 2

[0117]

[0118] Table 3

[0119]

[0120] In step S23, the step of dividing the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values ​​includes:

[0121] The natural break point method is used to determine the critical value of each analysis indicator and each evaluation level. For example, each analysis indicator is divided into 6 levels, and then the indicator value of each analysis indicator and the critical value of the 6 evaluation levels are divided according to the natural break point method.

[0122] In step S24, the step of determining the membership degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level by the indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object includes:

[0123] Set the standard range for each evaluation level;

[0124] The standard range of the indicator value of each analysis indicator is determined, and the indicator value is divided by the standard range as the membership degree (actual calculated value of the membership degree) of the evaluation level corresponding to the analysis indicator in the analysis indicator range.

[0125] Preferably, the step of determining the degree of membership of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level by the indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object further comprises:

[0126] If the indicator value does not fall within the standard range of a certain evaluation level, the membership degree is marked as 0;

[0127] The evaluation level corresponding to the standard range of the indicator value, and the degree of membership is the actual calculated value;

[0128] The membership degree of other evaluation levels that are inferior to the evaluation level corresponding to the standard range of the indicator value is marked as 1.

[0129] Further, preferably, it also includes:

[0130] A maximum critical value is set for each evaluation level. If the membership of the evaluation level in the standard range where the indicator value corresponding to the analysis indicator is located is greater than the corresponding maximum critical value, the membership is marked as 1 and not marked as the actual calculated value, which simplifies the membership matrix and reduces the amount of calculation while ensuring accuracy.

[0131] In step S26, the step of determining the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator includes:

[0132] Obtain indicator values ​​of multiple analytical indicators of multiple other organizations;

[0133] Normalize the indicator values ​​of multiple analysis indicators;

[0134] Obtain the ratio of the index value of an analytical index of another organization to the sum of the index values ​​of the analytical index of all standards

[0135]

[0136] Among them, g is the index of other organizations, q is the index of analysis indicators, and x is gq is the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization, n is the total number of other organizations, p gq is the weight of the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization;

[0137] The entropy value of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula:

[0138]

[0139] Where K = 1 / ln(n), e q is the entropy value of the qth analysis index, satisfying e q ≥0;

[0140] The information entropy redundancy of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula

[0141] d q =1-e q

[0142] Among them, d q is the information entropy redundancy of the qth analysis indicator;

[0143] The weight of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula:

[0144]

[0145] Among them, m is the total number of analysis indicators, w q is the weight of the qth analysis indicator,

[0146] In a specific embodiment of the present invention, China is taken as the evaluation object, and 15 organizations that have a standard adoption relationship with China are taken as multiple other organizations. The analysis indicators of the degree of influence include the number of adoptions, the number of field coverage, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoption, the current average time of adoption and the conversion speed index. The row number of the A matrix and the corresponding analysis indicators are given, and the natural break point method is used to divide the six evaluation levels, and the membership matrix A is obtained as shown in Table 4 below:

[0147] Table 4

[0148] A matrix row number Analytical Indicators Analysis Indicators Explained Weight 1 <![CDATA[x4]]> Number of IDTs 0.30 2 <![CDATA[x1]]> Number of adoptions 0.26 3 <![CDATA[x2]]> Field coverage 0.14 4 <![CDATA[x5]]> IDT ratio 0.09 5 <![CDATA[x3]]> Field ratio 0.06 6 <![CDATA[x8]]> Conversion Speed ​​Index 0.06 7 <![CDATA[x6]]> Average time to scrap 0.04 8 <![CDATA[x7]]> Current average adoption time 0.04

[0149] It can be seen from the ranking score table that in terms of the impact of standards of other countries and organizations on my country's standards, ISO, IEC and the United States rank in the top three.

[0150]

[0151]

[0152] The i-th row of the matrix represents the degree of affiliation of the country or organization to each level of the analysis indicator, where 1 means that it is completely affiliated with the level and 0 means that it is not affiliated with the level at all. Intuitively, from the perspective of each row, the fewer the number of 0s, the higher the value of the analysis indicator corresponding to the row; from the perspective of each column, the weight of the analysis indicator corresponding to the previous column is higher than that of the next column. For example, in A ISO In the example, assuming that the index value corresponding to the fourth row is 3.83, the critical values ​​of the evaluation levels from poor to excellent are:

[0153] (0,1], (1,2], (2,3], (3,4], (4,5], (5,6]

[0154] Since 3.83 is greater than 1, 2, and 3, the last three columns of the fourth row are marked as "1" respectively, and 3.83 is less than 5 and 4, so the first two rows are marked as "0" respectively. Since 3.83 is greater than 3 and less than 4, 0.83 = (3.83-3) / (4-3).

[0155] The decisive factors for ISO and IEC to rank in the top two are the same, that is, the calculated values ​​of ISO and IEC in the three analytical indicators of number of adoptions, number of IDTs, and number of fields covered are much greater than those of other countries and organizations in the database. At the same time, these three analytical indicators are also the three analytical indicators with the largest weights among all analytical indicators, so the influence of ISO and IEC standards can be ranked in the top two.

[0156]

[0157] The same is true for the United States. Although the United States is slightly better in terms of adoption viscosity and speed, it is not enough to make up for the disadvantages of the number of adoptions, the number of IDTs, and the number of fields covered compared with ISO and IEC. Therefore, it can only be ranked third.

[0158] Through the membership matrix and the influence degree analysis method of the standard adoption relationship on the organization of the present invention, the influence degree of each country (organization, region) on my country's standards is obtained, as shown in Table 5:

[0159] Table 5

[0160] Ranking Country and organization name Impact 1 ISO 85.92 2 IEC 76.30 3 USA 63.66 4 EN 50.30 5 Türkiye 44.52 6 Japan 41.09 7 Germany 39.54 8 OECD 36.57 9 U.K. 34.30 10 Russia 33.23 11 France 30.27 12 Canada 27.88 13 Australia 26.67 14 Italy 22.78 15 Spain 21.53

[0161] In summary, in terms of the influence of national standards by various countries, the leading role is played by absolute analysis indicators such as the number of adoptions, the number of IDTs, and the number of fields covered. Secondly, among the top five countries and organizations, international standardization organizations occupy three seats, which also reflects that the current formulation of standards in my country mainly tends to be internationally universal, rather than to certain countries.

[0162] Figure 2-4 The relationship between the ranking score and the number of adoptions, the number of fields covered, and the number of IDTs. Combining the three figures, we can find that when the number of adoptions and the number of fields covered are equal, the number of IDTs becomes the key factor affecting the ranking.

[0163] Figure 5 and Figure 6 Visualization results of ISO key adopted fields (sorted by the number of ISO standards adopted by national standards in each field. The larger the number, the more important the field. The number threshold of key adopted fields can be set to obtain key adopted fields). Figure 5 and Figure 6 It can be concluded that in terms of the affected industry fields, among all ISO standards that affect Chinese standards, the three industries of "earth-moving machinery", "chemical reagents", and "bolts, screws, and studs" have a greater impact on my country's standards, with the number of standards affected being 172, 161, and 143 respectively. Following closely behind the first three industries are "rubber", "paint and varnish", "mechanical testing of metal materials", etc. In summary, it can be seen that the industries currently affected by ISO in my country are mainly related to industry and chemistry.

[0164] Figure 7 and Figure 8 The visualization results of the key adopted fields of IEC and the United States are shown below. The second most influential industry is the electrical industry, which is also determined by the organizational characteristics of the IEC International Electrotechnical Commission. The United States mainly affects the formulation of Chinese standards in the fields of energy such as petroleum.

[0165] In an optional embodiment, the method for analyzing the impact of standard adoption on an organization includes:

[0166] Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0167] Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0168] Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0169] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the average time of adoption to be abolished, the current average time of adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with a second standard, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the average time of adoption to be abolished is the average of the time from publication to the time of abandonment of the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the current average time of adoption is the average of the time from publication to the time of evaluation of the first standard that has not been abolished in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of a second standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluation object;

[0170] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0171] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0172] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0173] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0174] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level pThe harmony degree of the system is a linear function of the degree of membership, a is the degree of unity, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, j is the disharmony coefficient, preferably, a = a qp , the unity degree is used to indicate the proportion of harmonious participants who have the "same goal" according to the harmony rules; b is the divergence parameter, b=1-a, indicating the proportion of harmonious participants who have divergences in comparison with the harmony rules and goals; i is the harmony coefficient, reflecting the satisfaction degree of the harmony goal; j is the disharmony coefficient, reflecting the degree of attention paid by harmonious participants to the divergent phenomenon, and the larger the HD is, the more a certain evaluation object belongs to a certain evaluation level;

[0175] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0176] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0177] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels obtains the influence degree of a second standard on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the second standard on the evaluation object is.

[0178] The specific implementation of the above-mentioned method for analyzing the degree of influence of the standard adoption relationship on the organization is substantially the same as the specific implementation in the first embodiment, and will not be described in detail here.

[0179] In an optional embodiment, the method for analyzing the impact of standard adoption on an organization includes:

[0180] Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0181] Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including:

[0182] Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0183] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoption, the average time of current adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions of a second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of the second standard of another organization with which it has an adoption relationship;

[0184] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0185] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0186] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0187] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0188] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system is a linear function of the degree of membership, a is the degree of unity, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, j is the disharmony coefficient, preferably, a = a qp , the unity degree is used to indicate the proportion of harmonious participants who have the "same goal" according to the harmony rules; b is the divergence parameter, b=1-a, indicating the proportion of harmonious participants who have divergences in comparison with the harmony rules and goals; i is the harmony coefficient, reflecting the satisfaction degree of the harmony goal; j is the disharmony coefficient, reflecting the degree of attention paid by harmonious participants to the divergent phenomenon, and the larger the HD is, the more a certain evaluation object belongs to a certain evaluation level;

[0189] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0190] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0191] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0192] The specific implementation of the above-mentioned method for analyzing the degree of influence of the standard adoption relationship on the organization is substantially the same as the specific implementation in the first embodiment, and will not be described in detail here.

[0193] Fig. 9 is a block diagram of the system for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to the present invention. Fig. 9 As shown, the standard adopts the relationship to the impact of the organization analysis system includes:

[0194] The first server 1 collects multiple organizations and the standards they set to obtain analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0195] The second server 2 receives the organization input by the client, takes the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, calls the analysis information of the evaluation object from the first server, and analyzes the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information, including:

[0196] The standard division module 21 obtains a plurality of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0197] The indicator construction module 22 constructs analysis indicators, and the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolescence, the average time of current adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index. The number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT The ratio is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of obsolescence adoption is the average value of the obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the obsolescence time; the current average adoption time is the average value of the non-obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the evaluation time; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with it; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object;

[0198] A level classification module 23 divides the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0199] A membership degree obtaining module 24 obtains an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determines the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0200] The first harmony degree obtaining module 25 determines the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level by the following formula:

[0201] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0202] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system is a linear function of the degree of membership, a is the degree of unity, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, j is the disharmony coefficient, preferably, a = a qp, the unity degree is used to indicate the proportion of harmonious participants who have the "same goal" according to the harmony rules; b is the divergence parameter, b=1-a, indicating the proportion of harmonious participants who have divergences in comparison with the harmony rules and goals; i is the harmony coefficient, reflecting the satisfaction degree of the harmony goal; j is the disharmony coefficient, reflecting the degree of attention paid by harmonious participants to the divergent phenomenon, and the larger the HD is, the more a certain evaluation object belongs to a certain evaluation level;

[0203] A weight obtaining module 26 determines the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator;

[0204] The second harmony degree obtaining module 27 obtains the harmony degree of each evaluation level by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0205] The influence degree analysis module 28 combines the harmony of multiple evaluation levels to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0206] In an optional embodiment, the standard division module takes an organization as an evaluation object, the standard in the evaluation object as the first standard, and collects multiple second standards that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object; the indicator construction module constructs analysis indicators of the degree of influence, and the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the adoption quantity, field coverage number, field ratio, average adoption time of cancellation, current average adoption time, average conversion time and conversion speed index, the adoption quantity is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with a second standard, the field coverage number is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage number to the adoption quantity; the average adoption time of cancellation ... The time is the average value from the publication time to the cancellation time of the obsolete first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the current average adoption time is the average value from the publication time to the evaluation time of the non-obsolete first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of a second standard with which it has an adoption relationship, and the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluation object; the influence degree analysis module obtains the influence degree of a second standard on the evaluation object through the harmony combination of multiple evaluation levels, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence of the second standard on the evaluation object is.

[0207] In an optional embodiment, the standard division module takes a standard as the first standard, takes the first standard as the evaluation object, obtains multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object, and the standards in the other organizations are taken as the second standard; the indicator construction module constructs analysis indicators of the degree of influence, and the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the IDT quantity, IDT ratio, average obsolete adoption time, current average adoption time, average conversion time and conversion speed index; the IDT quantity is the number of equivalent adoptions of a second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is the ratio of the IDT quantity to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of the second standard of another organization with which it has an adoption relationship.

[0208] In the above embodiments, i and j can reflect the importance that the user of the method attaches to the uniformity and divergence of an evaluation object. For example, if an object needs to be evaluated by this method, it can be evaluated from two perspectives, namely, uniformity and divergence. The greater the uniformity or the smaller the divergence, the more it can affect the evaluation result of an evaluation object. By changing i and j, the influence of the positive and negative aspects on the evaluation result can be comprehensively considered. According to HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj to calculate the harmony degree of each evaluation object at each level. For the convenience of calculation in this study, i=1, j=0. Therefore, the final harmony degree at each level is equal to the unity degree a.

[0209] The method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization provided by the present invention can be applied to the electronic device 10. Fig.10 , which is a schematic diagram of the application environment of a preferred embodiment of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on an organization according to the present invention.

[0210] In this embodiment, the electronic device 10 may be a terminal client having a computing function, such as a server, a mobile phone, a tablet computer, a portable computer, or a desktop computer.

[0211] The memory 11 includes at least one type of readable storage medium. The at least one type of readable storage medium may be a non-volatile storage medium such as a flash memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card-type memory, etc. In some embodiments, the readable storage medium may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 10, such as a hard disk of the electronic device 10. In other embodiments, the readable storage medium may also be an external memory of the electronic device 10, such as a plug-in hard disk equipped on the electronic device 10, a smart memory card (Smart Media Card, SMC), a secure digital (SecureDigital, SD) card, a flash card (Flash Card), etc.

[0212] In this embodiment, the readable storage medium of the memory 11 is generally used to store the influence degree analysis program 110 of the standard adoption relationship on the organization installed in the electronic device 1. The memory 11 can also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.

[0213] In some embodiments, the processor 12 may be a central processing unit (CPU), a microprocessor or other data processing chip, used to run program codes or process data stored in the memory 11, such as executing the impact analysis program 10 of the standard adoption relationship on the organization.

[0214] The network interface 13 may optionally include a standard wired interface, a wireless interface (such as a WI-FI interface), and is generally used to establish a communication connection between the electronic device 10 and other electronic clients.

[0215] The communication bus 14 is used to realize the connection and communication between these components.

[0216] Fig.10 The electronic device 10 is shown only with components 11 - 14 , but it is understood that implementing all of the components shown is not a requirement, and more or fewer components may alternatively be implemented.

[0217] Optionally, the electronic device 10 may also include a user interface, which may include an input unit such as a keyboard, a voice input device such as a microphone, a client with a voice recognition function, a voice output device such as a speaker, headphones, etc. Optionally, the user interface may also include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface.

[0218] Optionally, the electronic device 10 may further include a display, which may also be referred to as a display screen or a display unit.

[0219] In some embodiments, it may be an LED display, a liquid crystal display, a touch-sensitive liquid crystal display, an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) touch device, etc. The display is used to display information processed in the electronic device 10 and to display a visual user interface.

[0220] Optionally, the electronic device 10 further includes a touch sensor. The area provided by the touch sensor for the user to perform a touch operation is called a touch control area. In addition, the touch sensor described here may be a resistive touch sensor, a capacitive touch sensor, etc. Moreover, the touch sensor includes not only a contact touch sensor, but also a proximity touch sensor, etc. In addition, the touch sensor may be a single sensor or a plurality of sensors arranged in an array, for example.

[0221] Optionally, the electronic device 10 may also include a logic gate circuit, a sensor, an audio circuit, etc., which will not be described in detail here.

[0222] exist Fig.10 In the device embodiment shown, the memory 11 as a computer storage medium may include an operating system and a program 110 for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations; when the processor 12 executes the program 110 for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations stored in the memory 11, the following steps are implemented:

[0223] Collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set to obtain analysis information, the analysis information including identifiers of the multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0224] The organization input by the client is used as the evaluation object, and the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object is analyzed through information analysis, including:

[0225] A plurality of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object are obtained through the collected analysis information, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0226] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoptions, the current average time of adoptions, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is I The ratio of the number of DTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of adoption of obsolete standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization is the average value from the publication time to the time of obsolete standards; the current average adoption time is the average value from the publication time to the evaluation time of the first standards that have not been obsolete in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with the first standard; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object;

[0227] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0228] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0229] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0230] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0231] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0232] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0233] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0234] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0235] In other embodiments, the program 10 for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on an organization can also be divided into one or more modules, one or more modules are stored in the memory 11, and executed by the processor 12 to complete the present invention. The module referred to in the present invention refers to a series of computer program instruction segments that can complete specific functions. The program 110 for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on an organization can be divided into modules of the system for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on an organization.

[0236] In addition, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium includes a program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations. When the program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0237] Collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set to obtain analysis information, the analysis information including identifiers of the multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations;

[0238] The organization input by the client is used as the evaluation object, and the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object is analyzed through information analysis, including:

[0239] A plurality of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object are obtained through the collected analysis information, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard;

[0240] Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoptions, the current average time of adoptions, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is I The ratio of the number of DTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of adoption of obsolete standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization is the average value from the publication time to the time of obsolete standards; the current average adoption time is the average value from the publication time to the evaluation time of the first standards that have not been obsolete in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with the first standard; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object;

[0241] Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values;

[0242] Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object;

[0243] The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level:

[0244] HD(x q ,y p )=ai-bj

[0245] Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient;

[0246] Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator;

[0247] The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level;

[0248] The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

[0249] The specific implementation of the electronic device and computer-readable storage medium of the present invention is substantially the same as the specific implementation of the above-mentioned method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationship on organization, and will not be described in detail here.

[0250] The method, system, electronic device and computer-readable storage medium for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations described in the present invention solve the problem of quantitatively representing the degree of influence of standards of various countries, thereby solving the problem of which countries specifically influence my country's standards in the formulation of standards in various industries and presenting this degree of influence in a digital form, making subsequent analysis more scientific and reliable.

[0251] Although the above disclosed content shows exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it should be noted that, without departing from the scope defined in the claims, various changes and modifications may be made. The functions, steps and / or actions of the method claims according to the invention embodiments described herein do not need to be performed in any particular order. In addition, although the elements of the present invention may be described or required in individual form, it is also conceivable to have multiple elements unless explicitly limited to a single element.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relations on an organization, characterized in that: include: Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations; Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including: Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard; Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoptions, the current average time of adoptions, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is I The ratio of the number of DTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of adoption of obsolete standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization is the average value from the publication time to the time of obsolete standards; the current average adoption time is the average value from the publication time to the evaluation time of the first standards that have not been obsolete in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with the first standard; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object; Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values; Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object; The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level: HD(x q ,y p )=hai-bj Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient; Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator; The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level; The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the degree of influence of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the degree of influence is, the greater the degree of influence of the other organization on the evaluation object is. Obtaining an indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis indicator in each evaluation level through the indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object, including: Among them, each indicator value is selected one by one, and the category membership is divided according to the evaluation grade standard corresponding to the analysis indicator. If the indicator value of the analysis indicator is the maximum value within the corresponding evaluation grade standard range, it is marked as 1 at that place, and all grades lower than the evaluation grade are also marked as 1. If the indicator value does not fall within a certain evaluation grade standard range, it is marked as 0, and so on, until the category membership of the evaluation grades corresponding to all indicator values ​​is divided, and an m-row k-column membership matrix is ​​obtained.

2. The method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of dividing the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values ​​comprises: The natural break point method is used to determine the critical values ​​of each analysis indicator and each evaluation level.

3. The method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of determining the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator comprises: The entropy method is used to determine the weight of each analysis indicator.

4. The method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of using the entropy method to determine the weight of each analysis indicator includes: Obtain indicator values ​​of multiple analytical indicators of multiple other organizations; Normalize the indicator values ​​of multiple analysis indicators; Obtain the ratio of the index value of an analytical index of another organization to the sum of the index values ​​of the analytical index of all standards Among them, g is the index of other organizations, q is the index of analysis indicators, and x is gq is the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization, n is the total number of other organizations, p gq is the weight of the index value of the qth analysis index of the gth other organization; The entropy value of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula: Where K = 1 / ln(n), e q is the entropy value of the qth analysis index, satisfying e q ≥0; The information entropy redundancy of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula d q =1-e q Among them, d q is the information entropy redundancy of the qth analysis indicator; The weight of each analysis indicator is obtained by the following formula: Among them, m is the total number of analysis indicators, w q is the weight of the qth analysis indicator, 5. The method for analyzing the influence of standard adoption relationship on organization according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of determining the membership degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level by the indicator value of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object comprises: Set the standard range for each evaluation level; The standard range of the indicator value of each analysis indicator is determined, and the indicator value is divided by the degree of membership of the evaluation level corresponding to the analysis indicator in the standard range.

6. A method for analyzing the impact of standard adoption relationships on organizations, characterized in that: include: Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations; Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including: Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard; Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the average time of adoption to be abolished, the current average time of adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index, the number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with a second standard, the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the average time of adoption to be abolished is the average of the time from publication to the time of abandonment of the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the current average time of adoption is the average of the time from publication to the time of evaluation of the first standard that has not been abolished in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with a second standard; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of a second standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluation object; Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values; Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object; The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level: HD(x q ,y p )=hai-bj Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient; Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator; The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level; The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels obtains the influence degree of a second standard on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the second standard on the evaluation object is.

7. A method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relations on an organization, characterized in that: include: Constructing a first server, collecting multiple organizations and the standards they set, and obtaining analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations; Construct a second server, take the organization input by the client as the evaluation object, and analyze the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, including: Obtaining multiple other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, the standard in the evaluation object is used as the first standard, and the standards in the other organizations are used as the second standard; Constructing analysis indicators, the analysis indicators include multiple ones of the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of obsolete adoption, the average time of current adoption, the average conversion time and the conversion speed index; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions of a second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the average conversion time is the average of the difference between the release date of the first standard and the release date of the second standard of another organization with which it has an adoption relationship; Divide the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values; Obtaining an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determining the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object; The following formula is used to determine the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level: HD(x q ,y p )=hai-bj Among them, y p represents the pth level corresponding to the qth analysis indicator xq, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient; Determine the weight of each analytical indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analytical indicator; The harmony degree of each evaluation level is obtained by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level; The harmony degree combination of multiple evaluation levels is used to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object, and the larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

8. A system for analyzing the impact of standard adoption on an organization, characterized in that: include: The first server collects multiple organizations and the standards they set to obtain analysis information, wherein the analysis information includes identifiers of the multiple organizations that set the standards, identifiers of each standard set by each organization, and identifiers of adoption relationships between different organizations; The second server receives the organization input by the client, takes the organization input by the client as an evaluation object, calls analysis information of the evaluation object from the first server, and analyzes the influence of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object on the evaluation object through the analysis information, including: A standard division module, which obtains a plurality of other organizations that have an adoption relationship with the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and uses the standard in the evaluation object as the first standard and the standards in the other organizations as the second standard; An indicator construction module is used to construct analysis indicators, wherein the analysis indicators include a plurality of the following: the number of adoptions, the number of field coverages, the field ratio, the number of IDTs, the IDT ratio, the average time of adoption to be abolished, the average time of current adoption, the average time of conversion and the conversion speed index. The number of adoptions is the number of first standards in the evaluation object that have an adoption relationship with another organization; the field coverage is the number of ICS fields covered by the first standard in the evaluation object that has an adoption relationship with another organization; the field ratio is the ratio of the field coverage to the number of adoptions; the number of IDTs is the number of equivalent adoptions in the second standard of another organization adopted by the evaluation object; the IDT ratio The rate is the ratio of the number of IDTs to the number of second standards of another organization adopted by the evaluated object; the average time of obsolescence adoption is the average value of the obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the obsolescence time; the current average adoption time is the average value of the non-obsolete first standards in the evaluated object that have an adoption relationship with another organization from the publication time to the evaluation time; the average conversion time is the average value of the difference between the publication date of the first standard and the publication date of the second standard of another organization that has an adoption relationship with it; the conversion speed index is the ratio of the average conversion speed to the average conversion time of all first standards in the evaluated object; The level division module divides the analysis indicators into multiple evaluation levels according to the indicator values; A membership degree obtaining module, which obtains an index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object through the analysis information collected by the first server, and determines the membership degree of each analysis index in each evaluation level through the index value of each analysis index of the evaluation object; The first harmony degree acquisition module determines the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level according to the membership degree of each analysis indicator of the evaluation object at each evaluation level through the following formula: HD(x q ,y p )=hai-bj Among them, y p Represents the qth analysis index x q The corresponding p-th level, HD(x q ,y p ) represents the analysis index x q In the evaluation level p The harmony degree of the system, a is the unity degree, which is a linear function of the membership degree, b is the divergence parameter, b = 1-a, i is the harmony coefficient, and j is the disharmony coefficient; A weight acquisition module determines the weight of each analysis indicator according to the amount of information contained in each analysis indicator; The second harmony degree acquisition module obtains the harmony degree of each evaluation level by combining the weight of each analysis indicator and the harmony degree of each analysis indicator at each evaluation level; The influence degree analysis module combines the harmony of multiple evaluation levels to obtain the influence degree of another organization on the evaluation object. The larger the value of the influence degree is, the greater the influence degree of the other organization on the evaluation object is.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: It includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations, and when the program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium includes a program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations. When the program for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations is executed by a processor, the steps of the method for analyzing the degree of influence of standard adoption relationships on organizations as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images