Method, device, storage medium and electronic device for determining surplus retained materials

Abstract

The present application discloses a method, device, storage medium and electronic device for determining surplus retained materials. The method includes: scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, obtaining a score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme; calculating the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme; determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme; and determining the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation scheme. In the present application, by selecting a target evaluation scheme from each evaluation scheme, the evaluation results of each medical institution can be made more accurate and reasonable, which provides a guarantee for accurately determining the surplus retained materials for each medical institution according to the evaluation score.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of data processing technology, and in particular to a method, device, storage medium and electronic device for determining surplus retained materials. Background Art

[0002] Centralized bulk purchase of drugs is a major measure that benefits the people and can reduce the burden of medical expenses on society. The so-called "surplus retention" means that the remaining amount between the budget amount paid by medical insurance and the amount of drug expenditure after the price reduction through bulk purchase will be returned as a reward to public medical institutions that meet the conditions for surplus retention. This can encourage medical institutions to give priority to the use of selected drugs and even influence the future direction of non-selected varieties.

[0003] At present, there is no unified standard for the surplus retention policy. All local medical insurance bureaus conduct comprehensive assessments on medical institutions through manual review, such as listening to reports, questionnaires, and accepting materials, to determine whether each medical institution meets the surplus retention conditions. Finally, the amount of surplus retention that can be obtained by each medical institution is determined based on the evaluation results.

[0004] Since the assessment is done manually, the assessment speed is slow and the results are not accurate enough, resulting in unreasonable determination of surplus retained materials and a large amount of manpower costs. Summary of the invention

[0005] In view of this, the present invention provides a method, device, storage medium and electronic device for determining surplus retained materials, the main purpose of which is to solve the problems of inaccurate evaluation results and unreasonable determination of surplus retained materials caused by the current manual evaluation method.

[0006] In order to solve the above problems, this application provides a method for determining surplus retained materials, including:

[0007] Scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtaining a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0008] Based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme is calculated;

[0009] Determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each of the evaluation schemes;

[0010] The surplus retained materials of each medical institution are determined based at least on the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0011] Optionally, before scoring each medical institution, the method further includes:

[0012] Obtaining each of the evaluation schemes based on each evaluation indicator configuration in the indicator database;

[0013] The evaluation scheme includes the highest score corresponding to each evaluation indicator; and the scores corresponding to different indicator value ranges of the same evaluation indicator.

[0014] Optionally, scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme to obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme specifically includes:

[0015] Based on the actual indicator value of each evaluation indicator of each of the medical institutions, matching the target indicator value interval of the corresponding evaluation indicator in each of the evaluation schemes to determine the first evaluation score of each of the evaluation indicators of each of the medical institutions in each of the evaluation schemes;

[0016] Based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme, the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme is calculated;

[0017] Based on the evaluation scores of the medical institutions in the evaluation schemes, a score set of the evaluation scores of the medical institutions corresponding to the evaluation schemes is obtained.

[0018] Optionally, the step of calculating the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme specifically includes:

[0019] performing variance calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme respectively, so as to obtain a first reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0020] Alternatively, standard deviation calculation is performed based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme, so as to obtain the second reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0021] Alternatively, performing difference calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme respectively to obtain a number of difference values ​​corresponding to each evaluation scheme; performing weighted calculation based on each difference value of each evaluation scheme to obtain a third reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0022] Alternatively, difference calculations are performed based on the evaluation scores in the score sets of each evaluation scheme to obtain a number of differences corresponding to each evaluation scheme; and the difference ratio of each evaluation scheme is calculated based on the maximum difference and the minimum difference corresponding to each evaluation scheme to obtain the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme.

[0023] Optionally, determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme specifically includes:

[0024] Comparing the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme with the corresponding target reliability parameter respectively;

[0025] When it is determined that any one or several reliability parameters among the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter are less than the corresponding target reliability parameters, the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter is determined as the target evaluation scheme.

[0026] Optionally, after determining that the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter is the target evaluation scheme, the method further includes:

[0027] Identify the number of target evaluation options identified;

[0028] When there are multiple target evaluation schemes determined, the target evaluation schemes are displayed in sequence according to the order of the reliability parameters of the target evaluation schemes, and the target evaluation scheme with the smallest reliability parameter is determined as the final evaluation scheme.

[0029] Optionally, determining the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan specifically includes:

[0030] Matching the corresponding surplus retention allocation ratios based on the evaluation scores of the medical institutions;

[0031] Determine the calculation base of the surplus retention of each medical institution;

[0032] Based on the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution and the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution, the surplus retained materials of each medical institution are calculated separately.

[0033] In order to solve the above problems, the present application provides a device for determining surplus retained materials, including:

[0034] An evaluation module, used to score each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0035] A calculation module, used for calculating the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0036] A first determination module, configured to determine a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each of the evaluation schemes;

[0037] The second determination module is used to determine the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based on at least the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0038] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present application provides a storage medium, which stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method for determining the surplus retained materials described in any one of the above items.

[0039] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present application provides an electronic device, which at least includes a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program on the memory, the steps of the method for determining the surplus retained materials described in any one of the above items are implemented.

[0040] The method, device, storage medium and electronic device for determining the surplus retained materials in the present application can make the evaluation results of each medical institution more accurate and reasonable by selecting the target evaluation plan from various evaluation plans, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of the surplus retained materials for each medical institution according to the evaluation scores, while improving the evaluation rate and reducing the evaluation cost.

[0041] The above description is only an overview of the technical solution of the present invention. In order to more clearly understand the technical means of the present invention, it can be implemented according to the contents of the specification. In order to make the above and other purposes, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are listed below. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reading the detailed description of the preferred embodiments below. The accompanying drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be considered as limiting the present invention. Moreover, the same reference symbols are used throughout the accompanying drawings to represent the same components. In the accompanying drawings:

[0043] Figure 1 A flow chart of a method for determining surplus retained materials according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0044] Figure 2 This is a flow chart of a method for determining surplus retained materials according to another embodiment of the present application;

[0045] Figure 3 This is a structural block diagram of a device for determining surplus retained materials according to another embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] Various aspects and features of the present application are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0047] It should be understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments of the present application. Therefore, the above description should not be considered as limiting, but only as an example of an embodiment. Other modifications within the scope and spirit of the present application will occur to those skilled in the art.

[0048] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the present application and, together with the general description of the present application given above and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present application.

[0049] These and other characteristics of the present application will become apparent from the following description of a preferred form of embodiment given as a non-limiting example with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0050] It should also be understood that although the present application has been described with reference to some specific examples, those skilled in the art will be able to readily implement many other equivalent forms of the present application.

[0051] The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the present application will become more apparent in view of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0052] Specific embodiments of the present application are described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings; however, it should be understood that the embodiments applied for are merely examples of the present application, which may be implemented in a variety of ways. Well-known and / or repeated functions and structures are not described in detail to avoid unnecessary or redundant details that obscure the present application. Therefore, the specific structural and functional details applied for herein are not intended to be limiting, but merely serve as a basis and representative basis for the claims to teach those skilled in the art to use the present application in a variety of ways with substantially any suitable detailed structure.

[0053] This specification may use the phrases "in one embodiment," "in another embodiment," "in yet another embodiment," or "in other embodiments," all of which may refer to one or more of the same or different embodiments according to the present application.

[0054] The present application embodiment provides a method for determining surplus retained materials, such as Figure 1 As shown, including:

[0055] Step S101, scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtaining a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0056] In this step, each evaluation scheme can be directly obtained from the database. Each evaluation scheme is composed of different evaluation indicators, or the maximum score corresponding to the same evaluation indicator in each evaluation scheme is different, where the evaluation indicator can be any one or more of the following: drug cost growth rate, 30-day collection rate, proportion of non-selected drug procurement amount, cost utilization rate of other generic drugs with similar efficacy, proportion of offline procurement, number of violations in implementing the centralized procurement policy, etc.

[0057] In this step, after obtaining each evaluation scheme, the actual index value of each indicator of each medical institution can be obtained, and then based on the actual index value of each evaluation index of each medical institution, the target index value interval of the corresponding evaluation index in each evaluation scheme is matched to determine the first evaluation score of each evaluation index of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme. Then, based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation index of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme, the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme is calculated; based on the evaluation score of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme, a score set of the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme is constructed. Take the evaluation scheme including scheme A and scheme B as an example, where the evaluation indicators in scheme A include 30-day collection rate and offline purchase proportion, and the target index interval and corresponding score of 30-day collection rate are: [100%, 70%), 50 points; [70%, 40%), 35 points; [40%, 10%), 20 points; [10%, 0%), 5 points. The target indicator range and corresponding scores for offline purchase ratio are: [100%, 80%), 50 points; [80%, 60%), 40 points; [60%, 40%), 30 points; [40%, 20%), 20 points; [20%, 0], 10 points. The evaluation indicators of Plan B include the 30-day collection rate and the number of violations in the implementation of the centralized procurement policy; the target indicator range and corresponding scores for the 30-day collection rate are: [100%, 85%), 50 points; [85%, 70%), 40 points; [70%, 55%), 30 points; [55%, 40%), 20 points; [35%, 20], 10 points; [20%, 0], 5 points. The number of violations in the implementation of the centralized procurement policy is: 0 times, 50 points; [1, 2], 40 points; [3, 4], 30 points; [5, 6], 20 points; [7, 8], 10 points, more than 8 times, 0 points.

[0058] For example, the actual indicator value of medical institution A is 80% for the 30-day collection rate, 70% for the offline purchase ratio, and 1 violation for the centralized procurement policy. The actual indicator value of medical institution B is 65% for the 30-day collection rate, 75% for the offline purchase ratio, and 0 violation for the centralized procurement policy. Therefore, the actual indicator values ​​of A and B can be matched with the target intervals in schemes A and B respectively, so as to obtain the first evaluation scores of different indicators in different schemes. That is, when using evaluation scheme A for evaluation, the target evaluation interval corresponding to the 30-day collection rate of medical institution A is [100%, 70%), and the corresponding first evaluation score is 50 points; the target evaluation interval corresponding to the offline purchase ratio of medical institution A is 70%, and the corresponding first evaluation score is 40 points. Therefore, when using evaluation scheme A for evaluation, the evaluation score of medical institution A is 50+40=90 points; similarly, the evaluation score of medical institution B is 35+40=75 points. Thus, the score set of the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to evaluation scheme A is: 90, 75. Similarly, when using evaluation scheme B for evaluation, the target evaluation interval corresponding to the 30-day payment collection rate of medical institution A of 80% is [85%, 70%), and the corresponding first evaluation score is 40 points; the target evaluation interval corresponding to the number of violations of medical institution A in implementing the centralized procurement policy is 1 time is [1, 2], and the corresponding first evaluation score is 40 points, so the evaluation score of medical institution A is 40+40=80 points; similarly, when using evaluation scheme B for evaluation, the evaluation score of medical institution B is 30+50=75 points. Then, the score set of the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to evaluation scheme B is: 80, 75.

[0059] Step S102, based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, calculate and obtain the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0060] In this step, when the evaluation scores of each medical institution under each evaluation scheme are obtained, the reliability parameters can be calculated to determine the fluctuation, offline status or polarization status of each evaluation score under the same evaluation scheme. This is used as the reliability parameter, which lays the foundation for the subsequent accurate determination of whether each evaluation scheme is reliable.

[0061] Step S103, determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme;

[0062] In the specific implementation process of this step, the evaluation scheme with smaller fluctuation in evaluation score and less polarization among the evaluation schemes is selected as the target evaluation scheme according to the reliability parameter. This makes the evaluation results of each medical institution more accurate, and provides a guarantee for the subsequent reasonable determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution.

[0063] Step S104, determining the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0064] In the specific implementation process of this step, after obtaining the evaluation scores of each medical institution, the corresponding surplus retention allocation ratio can be matched according to each score. For example, the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution can be quickly determined by looking up the mapping table of pre-constructed scores and surplus retention allocation ratios, or the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution can be determined according to the ranking of the evaluation scores of each medical institution. After determining the surplus retention allocation ratio, the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution can be further determined. Among them, the surplus retention calculation base refers to: the actual medical insurance expenditure amount of the medical institution's collectively procured drugs, which is lower than the budget amount of the medical insurance funds for the collectively procured drugs. The specific calculation formula is as follows: Medical insurance fund budget for collectively procured drugs = agreed purchase volume base * weighted average price of collectively procured drugs before collective procurement * proportion of usage of insured patients of collectively procured drugs * actual payment ratio of the medical insurance pooling fund; surplus calculation base = medical insurance fund budget for collectively procured drugs - actual medical insurance expenditure amount for collectively procured drugs. In this step, when determining the balance retention calculation base, a timing script can be set up through the program, and then the above required data is extracted from each medical institution and saved in the database every month, so as to ensure the accuracy and real-time of the data during the monthly calculation, and the balance calculation base is calculated. Finally, based on the balance retention allocation ratio of each medical institution and the balance retention calculation base of each medical institution, the balance retention materials of each medical institution are calculated, and the specific calculation formula is balance retention materials = balance retention calculation base * balance retention allocation ratio.

[0065] In this embodiment, by selecting the target evaluation plan from various evaluation plans, the evaluation results of each medical institution can be made more accurate and reasonable, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution based on the evaluation scores. At the same time, it improves the evaluation rate and reduces the evaluation cost.

[0066] Another embodiment of the present application provides a method for determining surplus retained materials, such as Figure 2 As shown, including:

[0067] Step S201, obtaining each evaluation scheme based on the configuration of each evaluation indicator in the indicator database; the evaluation scheme at least includes the highest score corresponding to each evaluation indicator and the scores corresponding to different indicator value intervals of the same evaluation indicator.

[0068] In this step, an indicator database can be pre-established to store various evaluation indicators and data related to each evaluation indicator. When establishing an indicator database, indicator information can be set for each indicator, wherein the indicator information can include the following categories: basic information, screening conditions, and statistical frequency. Further basic information includes: assessment type, indicator name, evaluation object, business table name, business field in the business table, calculation logic, assessment requirements, etc. Among them, the assessment type can be a proportion type, an evaluation level type (excellent, good, pass, etc.). The business table name refers to the name of the data table where the parameters related to the calculation of the indicator are stored. The screening condition refers to: filtering the business table obtained according to the basic information, reading the fields and dictionary values ​​of the table that can participate in the calculation, and setting thresholds for the fields that need to be used as screening conditions; for example, when calculating the growth rate of drug costs relative to last year, the screening conditions are last year's drug costs and this year's drug costs. In this way, the drug costs of last year and this year can be screened from the drug cost business table corresponding to each medical institution. The statistical frequency refers to the statistical frequency of each evaluation indicator, such as statistics by natural year, statistics by medical insurance fund settlement year, statistics by medical insurance fund settlement month, etc.

[0069] Specifically, when configuring the evaluation indicators in this step, various evaluation indicators that have been pre-generated and stored in the database can be selected on the solution generation page, and different evaluation schemes can be configured by configuring different combinations of evaluation indicators, and each indicator of the scheme can be assigned importance, weight, scoring method, benchmark score, etc. Specifically, the scoring method can select a first-level classification such as high-quality, medium-quality, low-quality, etc., and can also select a second-level classification: ascending ranking, descending ranking, absolute value increasing or decreasing (i.e., removing positive and negative), benchmark score increasing or decreasing, historical comparison value, normal distribution, etc. Among them, taking the historical comparison value as an example, the scoring method calculates the score by comparing the actual value of the indicator with its own historical value. For example, the assessment requirement for the growth rate of drug expenses is that if the drug expenditure amount this year is 1 percentage point higher than the expenditure amount of the previous year, 1 point will be deducted, and the maximum deduction is 10 points. Then, this module obtains the current year's drug expenditure amount and the historical expenditure amount, constructs and calculates the actual value growth rate, the difference with the historical value, the positive and negative scores, and the highest / lowest scores, so as to complete the configuration of the scoring method of the indicator.

[0070] Step S202: based on the actual indicator value of each evaluation indicator of each medical institution, match the target indicator value interval of the corresponding evaluation indicator in each evaluation scheme to determine the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme; based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme, calculate the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme; based on the evaluation score of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme, obtain a score set of the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme.

[0071] In this step, relevant data of each medical institution can be obtained from the above-mentioned indicator database to calculate the actual indicator value of each medical institution.

[0072] Step S203, based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, calculate and obtain the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme.

[0073] In this step, the reliability parameter can be specifically provided in any one or more of the following ways:

[0074] Method 1: Perform variance calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme to obtain the first reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme. In this method, the variance is calculated based on each evaluation score to determine the discreteness of each evaluation score. The smaller the variance, the smaller the fluctuation of the evaluation score, and the more stable and reliable the evaluation scheme.

[0075] Method 2: Calculate the standard deviation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme to obtain the second reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme. In this method, the standard deviation is calculated based on each evaluation score to determine the discreteness of each evaluation score. The smaller the standard deviation, the smaller the fluctuation of the evaluation score, and the more stable and reliable the evaluation scheme.

[0076] Method three: Perform difference calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme to obtain a number of differences corresponding to each evaluation scheme; perform weighted calculation based on the differences of each evaluation scheme to obtain the third reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme. In the specific calculation, each evaluation score in the score set of an evaluation scheme can be compared with the preset benchmark evaluation score to obtain the difference corresponding to each evaluation score, and then perform weighted calculation to obtain the difference sum of the evaluation scheme. In this method, the difference sum is calculated based on each evaluation score to determine the discreteness of each evaluation score relative to the benchmark evaluation score. The smaller the difference sum is, the smaller the fluctuation of the evaluation score is, the smaller the polarization is, and the more stable and reliable the evaluation scheme is.

[0077] Method 4: Perform difference calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme to obtain several differences corresponding to each evaluation scheme; calculate the difference ratio of each evaluation scheme based on the maximum difference and the minimum difference corresponding to each evaluation scheme to obtain the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme. In the specific calculation, the average calculation can be performed based on each evaluation score in the score set of each evaluation scheme to obtain the average evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, and then each evaluation score under the evaluation scheme is compared with the average evaluation score to obtain each difference under the evaluation scheme; finally, the difference ratio of the evaluation scheme is calculated based on the maximum difference and the minimum difference. It is also possible to compare each evaluation score in the score set of an evaluation scheme with a preset benchmark evaluation score to obtain the difference corresponding to each evaluation scheme.

[0078] Step S204: compare the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme with the corresponding target reliability parameter. If it is determined that the reliability parameter is less than the target reliability parameter, determine that the evaluation scheme is the target evaluation scheme.

[0079] During the specific implementation of this step, the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme can be compared with the corresponding target reliability parameter respectively; when it is determined that any one or several reliability parameters of the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter are smaller than the corresponding target reliability parameter, the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is smaller than the corresponding target reliability parameter is determined as the target evaluation scheme.

[0080] Step S205, matching the corresponding surplus retention allocation ratio based on the evaluation score of each medical institution; determining the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution; and calculating the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based on the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution and the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution.

[0081] In the specific implementation process of this step, the remaining retained materials can be determined according to the evaluation results and the allocation ratio, and finally the remaining retained materials of each medical institution are automatically calculated according to the remaining measurement base and the allocation ratio, which provides a guarantee for the subsequent accurate allocation of materials according to the evaluation score. For example, the remaining retained materials can be determined in the following way.

[0082] Step 1: Set the evaluation result level: for example, excellent, qualified, or unqualified.

[0083] Step 2: Establish a corresponding key between the evaluation score and the evaluation result: for example, an evaluation score of 80 points or above is excellent, an evaluation score of 60 points or above is qualified, and an evaluation score below 60 points is unqualified.

[0084] Step 3: Establish a mapping relationship between the evaluation results and the surplus retention allocation ratio: for example, the surplus retention ratio corresponding to excellent is 45%, the surplus retention ratio corresponding to qualified is 30%, and the surplus retention ratio corresponding to unqualified is 0%.

[0085] Step 4: Calculate the surplus retained materials based on the surplus measurement base and the surplus retention ratio.

[0086] In this embodiment, during the specific implementation, a high-performance key-value database remote dictionary service redis can be used to synchronize the data to be run to redis for storage when it is first acquired for calculation, thereby reducing the time loss of re-acquisition after the scheme is changed and increasing the efficiency of the scheme operation. In this step, after calculating the remaining retained materials of each medical institution, the various indicators and remaining retained materials of each medical institution under this evaluation scheme can also be displayed.

[0087] In the specific implementation process of this embodiment, in order to accurately determine a target evaluation scheme to obtain the evaluation results of each medical institution, after determining the target evaluation scheme according to the reliability parameter, the number of the determined target evaluation schemes can be further identified; when there are multiple target evaluation schemes, the target evaluation schemes are displayed in order according to the size order of the reliability parameters of each target evaluation scheme, and the target evaluation scheme with the smallest reliability parameter is determined as the final evaluation scheme. This provides a guarantee for the subsequent evaluation of each medical institution based on an optimal evaluation scheme.

[0088] In this embodiment, the target evaluation scheme is selected from various evaluation schemes according to the variance, standard deviation, difference sum and difference ratio, so that the evaluation results of each medical institution can be more accurate and reasonable, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution according to the evaluation scores, while improving the evaluation rate and reducing the evaluation cost.

[0089] Another embodiment of the present application provides a device for determining surplus retained materials, such as Figure 3 As shown, including:

[0090] Evaluation module 1, used to score each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0091] Calculation module 2, used for calculating the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0092] A first determination module 3, used to determine a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme;

[0093] The second determination module 4 is used to determine the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based on at least the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0094] During the specific implementation of this embodiment, the device for determining the surplus retained materials also includes a configuration module, which is specifically used to: obtain each evaluation plan based on the configuration of each evaluation indicator in the indicator database; the evaluation plan includes the importance of each evaluation indicator, the highest score corresponding to each evaluation indicator; and the scores corresponding to different indicator value intervals of the same evaluation indicator.

[0095] Specifically, the evaluation module is specifically used to: match the target indicator value interval of the corresponding evaluation indicator in each evaluation scheme based on the actual indicator value of each evaluation indicator of each medical institution, so as to determine the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme; calculate the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme; and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme based on the evaluation score of each medical institution in each evaluation scheme.

[0096] Specifically, the calculation module is specifically used to: perform variance calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme, so as to obtain the first reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0097] Alternatively, standard deviation calculation is performed based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme, so as to obtain the second reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0098] Alternatively, performing difference calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme respectively to obtain a number of difference values ​​corresponding to each evaluation scheme; performing weighted calculation based on each difference value of each evaluation scheme to obtain a third reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0099] Alternatively, difference calculations are performed based on the evaluation scores in the score sets of each evaluation scheme to obtain a number of differences corresponding to each evaluation scheme; and the difference ratio of each evaluation scheme is calculated based on the maximum difference and the minimum difference corresponding to each evaluation scheme to obtain the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme.

[0100] The specific determination module is specifically used to: compare the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme with the corresponding target reliability parameter respectively; when it is determined that any one or several reliability parameters among the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter are less than the corresponding target reliability parameter, determine the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter as the target evaluation scheme.

[0101] Specifically, the determination module is also used to: identify the number of determined target evaluation schemes; when there are multiple determined target evaluation schemes, display each target evaluation scheme in sequence according to the order of the size of the reliability parameters of each target evaluation scheme, and determine the target evaluation scheme with the smallest reliability parameter as the final evaluation scheme.

[0102] Specifically, the second determination module is specifically used to: match the corresponding surplus retention allocation ratio based on the evaluation score of each medical institution; determine the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution; based on the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution and the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution, calculate and obtain the surplus retained materials of each medical institution.

[0103] In this embodiment, by selecting the target evaluation plan from various evaluation plans, the evaluation results of each medical institution can be made more accurate and reasonable, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution based on the evaluation scores. At the same time, it improves the evaluation rate and reduces the evaluation cost.

[0104] Another embodiment of the present application provides a storage medium, wherein the storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following method steps are implemented:

[0105] Step 1: Score each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0106] Step 2: Based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, calculate the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0107] Step 3: Determine a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme;

[0108] Step 4: Determine the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0109] The specific implementation process of the above method steps can be found in any of the above-mentioned embodiments of the method for determining the surplus retained materials, and this embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0110] In this embodiment, by selecting the target evaluation plan from various evaluation plans, the evaluation results of each medical institution can be made more accurate and reasonable, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution based on the evaluation scores. At the same time, it improves the evaluation rate and reduces the evaluation cost.

[0111] Another embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, comprising at least a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the following method steps when executing the computer program on the memory:

[0112] Step 1: Score each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme;

[0113] Step 2: Based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, calculate the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme;

[0114] Step 3: Determine a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme;

[0115] Step 4: Determine the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan.

[0116] The specific implementation process of the above method steps can be found in any of the above-mentioned embodiments of the method for determining the surplus retained materials, and this embodiment will not be repeated here.

[0117] In this embodiment, by selecting the target evaluation plan from various evaluation plans, the evaluation results of each medical institution can be made more accurate and reasonable, avoiding the problems of large fluctuations and polarization in the evaluation scores, and providing a guarantee for the subsequent accurate determination of surplus retained materials for each medical institution based on the evaluation scores. At the same time, it improves the evaluation rate and reduces the evaluation cost.

[0118] The above embodiments are only exemplary embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. The protection scope of the present application is defined by the claims. Those skilled in the art may make various modifications or equivalent substitutions to the present application within the essence and protection scope of the present application, and such modifications or equivalent substitutions shall also be deemed to fall within the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for determining surplus retained materials, characterized in that: include: Scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtaining a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme; Based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme, the reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme is calculated; Determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each of the evaluation schemes; Determine the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan; The reliability parameter includes any one or more of the following: a first reliability parameter based on variance, a second reliability parameter based on standard deviation, a third reliability parameter based on a sum of differences, and a fourth reliability parameter based on a ratio of differences; The step of scoring each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme to obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme specifically includes: Based on the actual indicator value of each evaluation indicator of each of the medical institutions, matching the target indicator value interval of the corresponding evaluation indicator in each of the evaluation schemes to determine the first evaluation score of each of the evaluation indicators of each of the medical institutions in each of the evaluation schemes; Based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme, the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme is calculated; Based on the evaluation scores of the medical institutions in the evaluation schemes, obtaining a score set of the evaluation scores of the medical institutions corresponding to the evaluation schemes; Determining a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme specifically includes: Comparing the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme with the corresponding target reliability parameter respectively; When it is determined that any one or several reliability parameters among the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter are less than the corresponding target reliability parameters, the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter is determined as the target evaluation scheme.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Before scoring each medical institution, the method further includes: Obtaining each of the evaluation schemes based on each evaluation indicator configuration in the indicator database; The evaluation scheme includes the highest score corresponding to each evaluation indicator and the scores corresponding to different indicator value ranges of the same evaluation indicator.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The calculating and obtaining the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme specifically includes: performing variance calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme respectively, so as to obtain a first reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme; Alternatively, standard deviation calculation is performed based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme, so as to obtain the second reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme; Alternatively, performing difference calculation based on the evaluation scores in the score set of each evaluation scheme respectively to obtain a number of difference values ​​corresponding to each evaluation scheme; performing weighted calculation based on each difference value of each evaluation scheme to obtain a third reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme; Alternatively, difference calculations are performed based on the evaluation scores in the score sets of each evaluation scheme to obtain a number of differences corresponding to each evaluation scheme; and the difference ratio of each evaluation scheme is calculated based on the maximum difference and the minimum difference corresponding to each evaluation scheme to obtain the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that After determining that the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter is the target evaluation scheme, the method further includes: Identify the number of target evaluation options identified; When there are multiple target evaluation schemes determined, the target evaluation schemes are displayed in sequence according to the order of the reliability parameters of the target evaluation schemes, and the target evaluation scheme with the smallest reliability parameter is determined as the final evaluation scheme.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining of the surplus retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan specifically includes: Matching the corresponding surplus retention allocation ratios based on the evaluation scores of the medical institutions; Determine the calculation base of the surplus retention of each medical institution; Based on the surplus retention allocation ratio of each medical institution and the surplus retention calculation base of each medical institution, the surplus retained materials of each medical institution are calculated separately.

6. A device for determining surplus retained materials, characterized in that: include: An evaluation module, used to score each medical institution based on each evaluation scheme, and obtain a score set of evaluation scores of each medical institution corresponding to each evaluation scheme; A calculation module, used for calculating the reliability parameters of each evaluation scheme based on the score set of each medical institution evaluation score corresponding to each evaluation scheme; A first determination module, configured to determine a target evaluation scheme based on the reliability parameters of each of the evaluation schemes; A second determination module is used to determine the remaining retained materials of each medical institution based at least on the evaluation score of each medical institution corresponding to the target evaluation plan; The reliability parameter includes any one or more of the following: a first reliability parameter based on variance, a second reliability parameter based on standard deviation, a third reliability parameter based on a sum of differences, and a fourth reliability parameter based on a ratio of differences; The evaluation module is specifically used for: Based on the actual indicator value of each evaluation indicator of each of the medical institutions, matching the target indicator value interval of the corresponding evaluation indicator in each of the evaluation schemes to determine the first evaluation score of each of the evaluation indicators of each of the medical institutions in each of the evaluation schemes; Based on the first evaluation score of each evaluation indicator of any medical institution in any evaluation scheme, the evaluation score of the medical institution in the evaluation scheme is calculated; Based on the evaluation scores of the medical institutions in the evaluation schemes, obtaining a score set of the evaluation scores of the medical institutions corresponding to the evaluation schemes; The first determining module is specifically used for: Comparing the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter of each evaluation scheme with the corresponding target reliability parameter respectively; When it is determined that any one or several reliability parameters among the first reliability parameter, the second reliability parameter, the third reliability parameter and the fourth reliability parameter are less than the corresponding target reliability parameters, the evaluation scheme whose reliability parameter is less than the corresponding target reliability parameter is determined as the target evaluation scheme.

7. A storage medium, characterized in that: The storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method for determining the surplus retained materials according to any one of claims 1 to 5 are implemented.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that: The method comprises at least a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the steps of the method for determining the surplus retained materials as described in any one of claims 1 to 5 when executing the computer program on the memory.

Images