Operation saturation evaluation method and device based on team operation plan control

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method and device for evaluating job saturation based on the control of team job plans. The method combines the team's job saturation calculation information and the job saturation evaluation model to calculate the team's job saturation evaluation result, and performs job plan control operations on the team's job plan according to the job saturation evaluation result. The method can automatically measure the job saturation and thus intelligently adjust the team's job plan to realize the intelligent control function of the team's job plan, so that the team's job plan within a time period can be evenly arranged, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and control rationality of the team's job plan and thus improving the effectiveness of the team's job plan control results. In addition, the job saturation evaluation result can provide a reference basis for later resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and management convenience of management personnel for the team's job plan, and helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of operation plan control, and in particular to an operation saturation evaluation method and device based on team operation plan control. Background Art

[0002] Equipment maintenance is an important part of maintaining the safe and stable operation of equipment. Due to the wide variety of equipment maintenance work, the large amount of equipment, the large investment of manpower and material resources, and the wide range of professions involved, a lot of manpower and material resources are required to regulate the team work plan for equipment maintenance.

[0003] Currently, the most common method for controlling team work plans is for staff to independently formulate team work plans in advance based on various equipment management requirements, the current resource status of each team, and anticipated temporary emergencies. However, due to multiple factors such as the wide variety of work, large equipment load, tight human resources, and temporary emergencies, this method of manually controlling team work plans can easily lead to overcapacity, overload, and over-scope team work plans. This leads to low control rationality and low control efficiency, posing a significant risk to staff and equipment safety. Therefore, it is particularly important to provide a team work plan control method that can improve control efficiency and rationality. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method and device for evaluating the saturation of an operation based on the control of a team's operation plan, which can improve the efficiency and rationality of the control.

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, the first aspect of the present invention discloses a method for evaluating operation saturation based on team operation plan control, the method comprising:

[0006] Obtaining operation saturation calculation information corresponding to a team in a certain time period, and determining an operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model;

[0007] Determining whether the operation saturation assessment result meets the pre-set operation plan control conditions;

[0008] When the judgment result is yes, according to the operation saturation evaluation result, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0009] As an optional implementation manner, in the first aspect of the present invention, determining whether the job saturation evaluation result meets a preset job plan control condition includes:

[0010] Based on the operation saturation evaluation result, determining whether there is a target date within the certain time period in which the operation saturation is greater than or equal to a preset operation saturation threshold, and if the determination result is yes, determining that the operation saturation evaluation result satisfies the preset operation plan control condition; the certain time period includes multiple dates; each of the dates corresponds to an operation saturation;

[0011] The step of determining, based on the job saturation evaluation result, whether there is a target date within the certain time period where the job saturation is greater than or equal to a preset job saturation threshold, includes:

[0012] For each of the dates included in the certain time period, based on the staff saturation included in the job saturation assessment result, determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to a predetermined staff saturation threshold; when the judgment result is yes, determine that there is a target date in the certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the predetermined job saturation threshold; wherein, the target date includes a date in which the staff saturation is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold; the staff saturation includes person in charge saturation and / or member saturation.

[0013] As an optional embodiment, in the first aspect of the present invention, performing an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation assessment result to obtain the controlled operation plan information of the team includes:

[0014] Detecting whether a job plan control trigger instruction is received; when the detection result is yes, performing a job plan control operation on the job plan information included in the job plan control trigger instruction and the job saturation assessment result, to obtain the job plan information of the team after control; or

[0015] Based on the operation saturation assessment result, determine whether there are adjustable dates within the certain time period; when the judgment result is yes, determine the first operation saturation information corresponding to the required adjustment date and the second operation saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment result; the required adjustment date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is greater than or equal to the operation saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is less than the operation saturation threshold;

[0016] Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result;

[0017] According to the first target operation plan control result, an operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0018] As an optional embodiment, in the first aspect of the present invention, analyzing the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation assessment result to obtain a first target operation plan control result includes:

[0019] For each of the dates requiring control, the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring control is analyzed to obtain the control emergency situation of the date requiring control; when the control emergency situation is used to indicate that the control urgency of the date requiring control is greater than or equal to a preset control urgency threshold, the date interval between the date requiring control and each of the adjustable dates is calculated, and based on all the date interval values, a target adjustable date with a date interval value less than or equal to the date interval value threshold is determined as the first target operation plan control result; or

[0020] For each of the dates requiring adjustment, analyzing the first job saturation information corresponding to the date requiring adjustment to obtain the job importance corresponding to the date requiring adjustment; when the job importance is greater than or equal to a predetermined job importance threshold, calculating the configuration matching degree between the date requiring adjustment and each of the adjustable dates based on the first job saturation information and the second job saturation information, and determining, based on all the configuration matching degrees, a target adjustable date having a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching threshold as the first target job plan adjustment result;

[0021] The target adjustable date is a date used to adjust the work plan corresponding to the adjustable date.

[0022] As an optional embodiment, in the first aspect of the present invention, the method further comprises:

[0023] Determine whether the current situation of the team in a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation evaluation conditions. If the judgment result is yes, trigger the execution of the operation of obtaining the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in the certain time period;

[0024] The determination of whether the current situation of the team within a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation evaluation conditions includes:

[0025] Detecting whether a trigger instruction for the work saturation assessment of the team is received, and when the detection result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the preset work saturation assessment conditions; or,

[0026] Obtaining pre-assessment information corresponding to the team, and determining whether the pre-assessment information meets a pre-set assessment operation execution condition, and when the determination result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the operation saturation assessment condition;

[0027] Furthermore, determining whether the pre-assessment information satisfies a preset assessment operation execution condition includes:

[0028] If the pre-assessment information includes the total amount of work plans of the team within a certain time period, determining whether the total amount of work plans is greater than or equal to a preset total amount threshold of work plans, and if the judgment result is yes, determining that the pre-assessment information meets the preset assessment operation execution condition;

[0029] If the pre-evaluation information includes the interval time from the time when the team last performed the work plan control operation to the current time, determine whether the interval time is greater than or equal to a pre-set interval time threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that the pre-evaluation information meets the evaluation operation execution conditions.

[0030] As an optional embodiment, in the first aspect of the present invention, the method further comprises:

[0031] When it is determined that the adjustable date does not exist within the certain time period, determining the associated team set corresponding to the team according to the team identifier of the team; the associated team set includes one or more associated teams corresponding to the team;

[0032] Obtaining first team operation related information corresponding to the team and second team operation related information corresponding to the associated team set, and analyzing the first team operation related information and the second team operation related information to obtain a work correlation degree between the team and each of the associated teams;

[0033] Screening out at least one target work correlation degree whose work correlation degree is greater than or equal to a preset work correlation degree threshold from all the work correlation degrees, and determining a target correlation team set corresponding to the at least one target work correlation degree;

[0034] Obtaining associated operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the target associated team set, and determining an associated operation saturation evaluation result corresponding to the certain time period for each associated team included in the target associated team set based on the associated operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model;

[0035] According to the saturation evaluation results of all the associated operations, determining the target associated team that meets the associated operation saturation condition from the target associated team set;

[0036] Obtain the third operation saturation information corresponding to the target associated team, and analyze the first operation saturation information, the third operation saturation information and the operation saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target operation plan control result, and according to the second target operation plan control result, perform the operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; the operation saturation evaluation result set includes the operation saturation evaluation result and the associated operation saturation evaluation result.

[0037] As an optional embodiment, in the first aspect of the present invention, before determining the operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model, the method further includes:

[0038] Obtain team operation resource allocation information and unit operation plan influencing factors information;

[0039] Analyze the influencing factor information to obtain the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the department and the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the team under the department; the unit includes one or more departments; the department includes one or more teams;

[0040] According to the team operation resource configuration information, the team operation input standard quota information is set; the team operation input standard quota information includes the team operation quota standard information and the team operation number quota information;

[0041] Establishing an operation saturation assessment model corresponding to the team based on the operation input standard quota information, the team operation resource configuration information, the operation saturation threshold, and a pre-set saturation assessment algorithm; the saturation assessment algorithm includes a team leader saturation assessment algorithm and a team member saturation assessment algorithm;

[0042] The calculation formula corresponding to the job saturation evaluation algorithm is as follows:

[0043] The number of operating personnel refers to the number of team leaders or team members.

[0044] The second aspect of the present invention discloses a device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control, the device comprising:

[0045] The information acquisition module is used to obtain the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period;

[0046] An evaluation result determination module, configured to determine the operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model;

[0047] A judgment module, used to judge whether the operation saturation evaluation result meets the preset operation plan control conditions;

[0048] The operation plan control module is used to perform an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result when the judgment module determines that the operation saturation evaluation result meets the operation plan control condition, so as to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0049] As an optional implementation, in the second aspect of the present invention, the judgment module judges whether the job saturation evaluation result meets the preset job plan control condition in a manner specifically including:

[0050] Based on the operation saturation evaluation result, determining whether there is a target date within the certain time period in which the operation saturation is greater than or equal to a preset operation saturation threshold, and if the determination result is yes, determining that the operation saturation evaluation result satisfies the preset operation plan control condition; the certain time period includes multiple dates; each of the dates corresponds to an operation saturation;

[0051] The method in which the judgment module judges whether there is a target date in the certain time period with an operation saturation greater than or equal to a preset operation saturation threshold according to the operation saturation evaluation result specifically includes:

[0052] For each of the dates included in the certain time period, based on the staff saturation included in the job saturation assessment result, determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to a predetermined staff saturation threshold; when the judgment result is yes, determine that there is a target date in the certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the predetermined job saturation threshold; wherein, the target date includes a date in which the staff saturation is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold; the staff saturation includes person in charge saturation and / or member saturation.

[0053] As an optional embodiment, in the second aspect of the present invention, the operation plan control module performs an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result, and the method of obtaining the controlled operation plan information of the team specifically includes:

[0054] Detecting whether a job plan control trigger instruction is received; when the detection result is yes, performing a job plan control operation on the job plan information included in the job plan control trigger instruction and the job saturation assessment result, to obtain the job plan information of the team after control; or

[0055] Based on the operation saturation assessment result, determine whether there are adjustable dates within the certain time period; when the judgment result is yes, determine the first operation saturation information corresponding to the required adjustment date and the second operation saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment result; the required adjustment date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is greater than or equal to the operation saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is less than the operation saturation threshold;

[0056] Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result;

[0057] According to the first target operation plan control result, an operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0058] As an optional embodiment, in the second aspect of the present invention, the operation plan control module analyzes the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the first target operation plan control result in a manner specifically including:

[0059] For each of the dates requiring control, the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring control is analyzed to obtain the control emergency situation of the date requiring control; when the control emergency situation is used to indicate that the control urgency of the date requiring control is greater than or equal to a preset control urgency threshold, the date interval between the date requiring control and each of the adjustable dates is calculated, and based on all the date interval values, a target adjustable date with a date interval value less than or equal to the date interval value threshold is determined as the first target operation plan control result; or

[0060] For each of the dates requiring adjustment, analyzing the first job saturation information corresponding to the date requiring adjustment to obtain the job importance corresponding to the date requiring adjustment; when the job importance is greater than or equal to a predetermined job importance threshold, calculating the configuration matching degree between the date requiring adjustment and each of the adjustable dates based on the first job saturation information and the second job saturation information, and determining, based on all the configuration matching degrees, a target adjustable date having a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching threshold as the first target job plan adjustment result;

[0061] The target adjustable date is a date used to adjust the work plan corresponding to the adjustable date.

[0062] As an optional embodiment, in the second aspect of the present invention, the judgment module is further configured to judge whether the current situation corresponding to the team in a certain time period meets a preset operation saturation assessment condition, and when the judgment result is yes, trigger the information acquisition module to execute the operation of obtaining the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in the certain time period;

[0063] Furthermore, the judgment module judges whether the current situation of the team within a certain time period meets the preset operation saturation evaluation conditions in the following manner:

[0064] Detecting whether a trigger instruction for the work saturation assessment of the team is received, and when the detection result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the preset work saturation assessment conditions; or,

[0065] Obtaining pre-assessment information corresponding to the team, and determining whether the pre-assessment information meets a pre-set assessment operation execution condition, and when the determination result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the operation saturation assessment condition;

[0066] Furthermore, the manner in which the judgment module judges whether the pre-evaluation information satisfies a preset evaluation operation execution condition specifically includes:

[0067] If the pre-assessment information includes the total amount of work plans of the team within a certain time period, determining whether the total amount of work plans is greater than or equal to a preset total amount threshold of work plans, and if the judgment result is yes, determining that the pre-assessment information meets the preset assessment operation execution condition;

[0068] If the pre-evaluation information includes the interval time from the time when the team last performed the work plan control operation to the current time, determine whether the interval time is greater than or equal to a pre-set interval time threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that the pre-evaluation information meets the evaluation operation execution conditions.

[0069] As an optional implementation manner, in the second aspect of the present invention, the operation plan control module is further used to:

[0070] When it is determined that the adjustable date does not exist within the certain time period, determining the associated team set corresponding to the team according to the team identifier of the team; the associated team set includes one or more associated teams corresponding to the team;

[0071] Obtaining first team operation related information corresponding to the team and second team operation related information corresponding to the associated team set, and analyzing the first team operation related information and the second team operation related information to obtain a work correlation degree between the team and each of the associated teams;

[0072] Screening out at least one target work correlation degree whose work correlation degree is greater than or equal to a preset work correlation degree threshold from all the work correlation degrees, and determining a target correlation team set corresponding to the at least one target work correlation degree;

[0073] Obtaining associated operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the target associated team set, and determining an associated operation saturation evaluation result corresponding to the certain time period for each associated team included in the target associated team set based on the associated operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model;

[0074] According to the saturation evaluation results of all the associated operations, determining the target associated team that meets the associated operation saturation condition from the target associated team set;

[0075] Obtain the third operation saturation information corresponding to the target associated team, and analyze the first operation saturation information, the third operation saturation information and the operation saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target operation plan control result, and according to the second target operation plan control result, perform the operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; the operation saturation evaluation result set includes the operation saturation evaluation result and the associated operation saturation evaluation result.

[0076] As an optional embodiment, in the second aspect of the present invention, the information acquisition module is further configured to obtain the team's job resource configuration information and the unit's influencing factor information for the job plan before the evaluation result determination module determines the team's job saturation evaluation result based on the job saturation calculation information and a pre-established job saturation evaluation model;

[0077] The device further comprises:

[0078] An analysis module is configured to analyze the influencing factor information to obtain an operation saturation threshold corresponding to a department and an operation saturation threshold corresponding to a team under the department; the unit includes one or more departments; and the department includes one or more teams;

[0079] An information setting module is used to set the work input standard quota information of the team according to the work resource configuration information of the team; the work input standard quota information of the team includes the work quota standard information of the team and the work number quota information of the team;

[0080] A model building module is used to establish an operation saturation assessment model corresponding to the team based on the operation input standard quota information, the team operation resource configuration information, the operation saturation threshold and a pre-set saturation assessment algorithm; the saturation assessment algorithm includes a team leader saturation assessment algorithm and a team member saturation assessment algorithm;

[0081] And, the calculation formula corresponding to the job saturation evaluation algorithm is as follows:

[0082] The number of operating personnel refers to the number of team leaders or team members.

[0083] The third aspect of the present invention discloses another device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control, the device comprising:

[0084] a memory storing executable program code;

[0085] a processor coupled to the memory;

[0086] The processor calls the executable program code stored in the memory to execute the operation saturation assessment method based on team operation plan control disclosed in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0087] The fourth aspect of the present invention discloses a computer storage medium, which stores computer instructions. When the computer instructions are called, they are used to execute the job saturation assessment method based on team job plan control disclosed in the first aspect of the present invention.

[0088] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present invention have the following beneficial effects:

[0089] In an embodiment of the present invention, the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period is obtained, and the operation saturation evaluation result of the team is determined based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model; it is judged whether the operation saturation evaluation result meets the pre-set operation plan control conditions; when the judgment result is yes, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control. It can be seen that the implementation of the present invention combines the team's job saturation calculation information and the job saturation evaluation model to automatically calculate the team's job saturation evaluation result, and performs corresponding job plan control operations on the team's job plan based on the job saturation evaluation result. It can automatically measure the team's job saturation and intelligently adjust the team's job plan to achieve the intelligent automatic control function of the team's job plan, so that the team's job plan within a period of time can be arranged evenly, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and rationality of the team's job plan, and thus is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the team's job plan control results. In addition, the calculated job saturation evaluation result can provide a reference basis for later resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and convenience of management personnel for the team's job plan, and to a certain extent helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0090] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0091] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for evaluating job saturation based on team job plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0092] Figure 2 This is a flow chart of another method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0093] Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of a device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0094] Figure 4 2 is a schematic structural diagram of another device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0095] Figure 5This is a structural diagram of another operation saturation evaluation device based on team operation plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0096] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the solutions of the present invention, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0097] The terms "first," "second," and so on, in the description and claims of the present invention and the accompanying drawings are used to distinguish between different items, not to describe a specific order. Furthermore, the terms "including," "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, apparatus, product, or end comprising a series of steps or elements is not limited to the listed steps or elements but may optionally include steps or elements not listed therein, or may optionally include other steps or elements inherent to such process, method, product, or end.

[0098] References herein to "embodiments" mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. The appearance of this phrase in various places in the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor does it constitute a separate or alternative embodiment that is mutually exclusive of other embodiments. It is understood, both explicitly and implicitly, by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments.

[0099] The present invention discloses a method and device for evaluating the operation saturation based on the control of the team's operation plan. The method and device can automatically calculate the operation saturation evaluation result of the team in combination with the operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model of the team, and perform corresponding operation plan control operations on the team's operation plan according to the operation saturation evaluation result. The method can automatically measure the operation saturation of the team and intelligently adjust the operation plan of the team to realize the intelligent automatic control function of the team's operation plan, so that the operation plan of the team within a period of time can be arranged in a balanced manner, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and control rationality of the team's operation plan, and further conducive to improving the effectiveness of the team's operation plan control result. In addition, the calculated operation saturation evaluation result can provide a reference basis for later resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and management convenience of the management personnel for the team's operation plan, and to a certain extent helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation. The following are detailed descriptions.

[0100] Example 1

[0101] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the saturation of work based on team work plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 The described method can be applied to a device for evaluating the saturation of work based on a team work plan, wherein the device may include a server, wherein the server includes a local server or a cloud server, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown in FIG, the operation saturation evaluation method based on the team operation plan control includes the following operations:

[0102] 101. Obtain the work saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period.

[0103] In an embodiment of the present invention, optionally, the work saturation calculation information of the team may include but is not limited to one or more of the following: information of the current person in charge of the team, information of the current members of the team, information of the number of working days / working cycles corresponding to the above-mentioned time period, information of the person in charge of the team, information of the working members required by the team, etc., and the embodiment of the present invention does not limit this.

[0104] Optionally, for example, the above-mentioned time period can be one day, several days, one week, one month, or other time periods, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this. It should be noted that, optionally, the operation statistics scope corresponding to the operation saturation assessment method based on the team operation plan control can be the operation of a team, the operation of a department, or the operation of a power supply bureau, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0105] 102. Determine the work saturation evaluation results of the team based on the work saturation calculation information and the pre-established work saturation evaluation model.

[0106] In an embodiment of the present invention, optionally, the operation saturation assessment model may be a plurality of operation saturation assessment models according to different model differentiation conditions, or there may be only one operation saturation assessment model, which is not limited by the embodiment of the present invention. Further optionally, for example, the model differentiation conditions may be team differentiation conditions and / or department differentiation conditions and / or power supply bureau differentiation conditions, etc., or may be function and responsibility differentiation conditions and / or grade differentiation conditions and / or business level differentiation conditions, etc., or may be operation person in charge, operation member differentiation conditions and / or operation plan requirement differentiation conditions and / or operation cycle differentiation conditions, etc., which are not limited by the embodiment of the present invention.

[0107] 103. Determine whether the operation saturation assessment results meet the pre-set operation plan control conditions.

[0108] In an embodiment of the present invention, further optionally, when it is determined that the operation saturation evaluation result does not meet the operation plan control conditions, the duration of the interval to be evaluated is monitored, and when it is detected that the duration of the interval to be evaluated is greater than or equal to the duration threshold of the interval to be evaluated, the above-mentioned operation of obtaining the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period is performed again; the duration of the interval to be evaluated is the duration of the interval from the moment corresponding to the above-mentioned determination that the operation saturation evaluation result does not meet the operation plan control conditions to the current moment.

[0109] 104. When it is determined that the operation saturation evaluation result meets the operation plan control conditions, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0110] In an embodiment of the present invention, optionally, and specifically, performing a work plan control operation on work plan information may include adaptively controlling some work corresponding to dates with high work saturation values ​​to work on dates with low work saturation values. Furthermore, the work plan control operation may also optionally control the team work leader and / or team work members and / or team work date range to achieve a balanced arrangement of team work, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0111] Optionally, the job plan information may also include, but is not limited to, one or more of work category information, work location information, work content information, job plan start / end time information, work team information, work team work department information, work mode information, voltage level information, required number of workers information, work professional information, job plan type information, job plan status information, job plan number information, etc., and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0112] It can be seen that the operation saturation assessment method based on team operation plan control described in the embodiment of the present invention is combined with the team's operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment model to automatically calculate the team's operation saturation assessment result, and perform corresponding operation plan control operations on the team's operation plan according to the operation saturation assessment result. It can automatically measure the team's operation saturation and intelligently adjust the team's operation plan to realize the intelligent automatic control function of the team's operation plan, so that the team's operation plan within a period of time can be arranged evenly, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and rationality of the team's operation plan, and thus is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the team's operation plan control results. In addition, the calculated operation saturation assessment result can provide a reference basis for later resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and convenience of management personnel for the team's operation plan, and to a certain extent helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation.

[0113] In an optional embodiment, the above-mentioned determination of whether the job saturation evaluation result meets the preset job plan control condition may include:

[0114] Based on the results of the job saturation assessment, determine whether there is a target date in a certain time period with a job saturation greater than or equal to a pre-set job saturation threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that the job saturation assessment result meets the pre-set job plan control conditions; a certain time period includes multiple dates; each date corresponds to an job saturation.

[0115] In this optional embodiment, further optionally, when it is determined that there is no target date in a certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the job saturation threshold, it is determined that the job saturation evaluation result does not meet the job plan control condition.

[0116] Optionally, the target date for which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the job saturation threshold may include one or more dates within a certain time period, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention. Optionally, the job saturation corresponding to different dates may have the same value or different values, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention.

[0117] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can determine whether there is a target date within a certain time period based on the operation saturation assessment results. If so, it is determined that the operation plan control conditions are met, which is conducive to improving the rationality of the results of the determined operation plan control conditions being met, and further conducive to improving the rationality and accuracy of the control of the team's operation plan.

[0118] In another optional embodiment, the above-mentioned determination of whether there is a target date within a certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to a preset job saturation threshold based on the job saturation evaluation result may include:

[0119] For each date included in a certain time period, based on the staff saturation included in the job saturation assessment result, determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to a predetermined staff saturation threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that there is a target date in the certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the predetermined job saturation threshold; wherein, the target date includes the date in which the staff saturation is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold; the staff saturation includes the person in charge saturation and / or the member saturation.

[0120] In this optional embodiment, further optionally, when it is determined that the staff saturation corresponding to each date included in a certain time period is less than the staff saturation threshold, it is determined that there is no target date in the certain time period whose job saturation is greater than or equal to the job saturation threshold.

[0121] Optionally, the target date may include one or more dates when the staff saturation is greater than or equal to a staff saturation threshold, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention.

[0122] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold. If so, determining that a target date exists within a certain time period is beneficial to improving the rationality of the determined target date existence result to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of the target date existence result, and thus is beneficial to improving the rationality and effectiveness of the results of satisfying the work plan control conditions, as well as improving the rationality and logic of the team work plan control plan.

[0123] In another optional embodiment, the above-mentioned operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the adjusted operation plan information of the team, which may include:

[0124] Detect whether a job plan control trigger instruction is received; when the detection result is yes, perform a job plan control operation on the job plan information included in the job plan control trigger instruction and the job saturation evaluation result, and obtain the job plan information of the team after control; or

[0125] Based on the result of the job saturation assessment, determine whether there are adjustable dates within a certain time period. If the judgment result is yes, determine the first job saturation information corresponding to the date that needs to be adjusted and the second job saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the job saturation calculation information and the job saturation assessment result. The date that needs to be adjusted is one or more dates within a certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the job saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within a certain time period in which the job saturation is less than the job saturation threshold.

[0126] Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the first target operation plan control result;

[0127] According to the first target operation plan control result, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information of the control-required control date included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0128] In this optional embodiment, the triggering method corresponding to the job plan control trigger instruction may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: triggering by a mobile phone number, triggering by a mini-program, triggering by a mobile phone text message, triggering by an app, triggering by a designated webpage, triggering by a device, etc., which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention. Optionally, the job plan control instruction information may include a date identifier corresponding to a date requiring control, wherein the date requiring control includes a control date for adding jobs and a control date for reducing jobs, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention.

[0129] Optionally, the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring regulation may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: staff information corresponding to the date requiring regulation, operation plan information corresponding to the date requiring regulation, operation information corresponding to the date requiring regulation, team saturation threshold information, operation saturation status information corresponding to the team, and information about the statistical period to which the date requiring regulation belongs, etc., and this is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Optionally, the specific information content corresponding to the second operation saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date can refer to, but is not limited to, the specific information content corresponding to the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring regulation mentioned above, and will not be repeated here.

[0130] Further optionally, when it is detected that no job plan control trigger instruction is received, the above-mentioned operation of detecting whether the job plan control trigger instruction is received is performed again.

[0131] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can determine the execution operation corresponding to the job plan control method through two methods: manually triggered job plan control trigger instructions or system automatic analysis of job saturation assessment results, enriching the diversity of job plan control methods and improving the flexibility and optionality of job plan control methods, thereby improving the rationality of job plan control methods, which is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the job plan information after control and improving the control efficiency of the job plan information.

[0132] In yet another optional embodiment, the above-mentioned analysis of the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the first target operation plan control result may include:

[0133] For each date requiring control, the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring control is analyzed to obtain the control emergency situation of the date requiring control; when the control emergency situation is used to indicate that the control urgency of the date requiring control is greater than or equal to a preset control urgency threshold, the date interval between the date requiring control and each adjustable date is calculated, and based on all date interval values, a target adjustable date with a date interval value less than or equal to the date interval value threshold is determined as the first target operation plan control result; or

[0134] For each date requiring adjustment, the first activity saturation information corresponding to the date requiring adjustment is analyzed to obtain the activity importance corresponding to the date requiring adjustment; when the activity importance is greater than or equal to a predetermined activity importance threshold, the configuration matching degree between the date requiring adjustment and each adjustable date is calculated based on the first activity saturation information and the second activity saturation information, and a target adjustable date having a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching degree threshold is determined based on all configuration matching degrees as the first target activity plan adjustment result;

[0135] The target adjustable date is the date used to adjust the work plan corresponding to the adjustable date.

[0136] In this optional embodiment, it should be noted that, optionally, when the control emergency situation is used to indicate that the control urgency is greater than or equal to the control urgency threshold and at least two target controllable dates are determined, the target controllable date with the smallest date interval value is first determined as the first target job plan control result. If the target controllable date with the smallest date interval value cannot completely process the job plan to be controlled, then the target controllable date with the second smallest date interval value is determined as the first target job plan control result to process the remaining job plans to be controlled, and so on, with the aim of shortening the completion processing time of the control job plan as much as possible.

[0137] Optionally, similarly, when the job importance is greater than or equal to the job importance threshold and at least two target adjustable dates are determined, the target adjustable date with the largest configuration matching value is preferentially selected as the first target job plan control result. If the target adjustable date with the largest configuration matching value cannot completely handle the job plan to be controlled, the target adjustable date with the second largest configuration matching value is determined as the first target job plan control result to handle the remaining job plans to be controlled, and so on.

[0138] In this optional embodiment, further optionally, the method may further include the following operations:

[0139] When the control emergency is used to indicate that the control urgency of the date to be controlled is less than the control urgency threshold, the target controllable date whose operation saturation value is less than or equal to the preset controllable operation saturation threshold is filtered out from all controllable dates as the first target operation plan control result.

[0140] Optionally, the adjustable job saturation threshold may be set based on the job saturation value on the date to be adjusted, or may be set based on other conditions, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0141] Optionally, the above-mentioned adjustable job saturation threshold can be set according to the job saturation value of the date to be adjusted. For example, when the job saturation value of the date to be adjusted is 80%, and the pre-set job saturation value threshold is 75%, the job saturation of the date to be adjusted exceeds 5%. At this time, the adjustable job saturation threshold can be set to a value less than or equal to 70%.

[0142] In this optional embodiment, further optionally, the method may further include the following operations:

[0143] When the importance of the job is less than the job importance threshold, the first date interval value between the date to be controlled and each adjustable date is calculated, and based on all the first date interval values, the target adjustable date with the first date interval value less than or equal to the first date interval value threshold is determined as the first target job plan control result.

[0144] Furthermore, for the case where at least two target adjustable dates are determined whose operation saturation values ​​are less than or equal to the adjustable operation saturation threshold value, or where at least two target adjustable dates are determined whose first date interval values ​​are less than or equal to the first date interval value threshold value, the adjustable date with the most positive and negative matching operation saturation values ​​is preferentially selected as the target adjustable date that is finally selected for adjustment. For example, when the operation saturation value of the date to be adjusted is 80%, the set operation saturation value threshold value is 75%, and the target adjustable dates determined include dates with operation saturation of 70% and 60%, respectively, the target adjustable date with operation saturation of 70% is preferentially selected as the target adjustable date that is finally selected for adjustment, so as to ensure the integrity of the team operation plan after adjustment.

[0145] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can provide a matching method for determining the first target operation plan control result from two perspectives: the control urgency of the control on the date to be controlled and the importance of the operation on the date to be controlled. This enriches the diversity of the method for determining the first target operation plan control result, and improves the flexibility and selectivity of the method for determining the first target operation plan control result, thereby improving the effectiveness and rationality of the determined first target operation plan control result, which is conducive to improving the rationality and comprehensiveness of the operation saturation evaluation method based on the team operation plan control, and is conducive to improving the control effectiveness and efficiency of the team operation plan.

[0146] In yet another optional embodiment, the method may further include the following operations:

[0147] When it is determined that there is no adjustable date within a certain time period, the associated team set corresponding to the team is determined according to the team ID of the team; the associated team set includes associated teams corresponding to one or more teams;

[0148] Obtaining the first team operation related information corresponding to the team and the second team operation related information corresponding to the associated team set, and analyzing the first team operation related information and the second team operation related information to obtain the work correlation between the team and each associated team;

[0149] Screening out at least one target work correlation degree whose work correlation degree is greater than or equal to a preset work correlation degree threshold from all work correlation degrees, and determining a target correlation team set corresponding to the at least one target work correlation degree;

[0150] Obtaining associated operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the target associated team set, and determining associated operation saturation evaluation results corresponding to each associated team included in the target associated team set in a certain time period based on the associated operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model;

[0151] According to the saturation evaluation results of all associated operations, the target associated teams that meet the associated operation saturation conditions are determined from the target associated team set;

[0152] Obtain the third operation saturation information corresponding to the target associated team, and analyze the first operation saturation information, the third operation saturation information and the operation saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target operation plan control result, and according to the second target operation plan control result, perform the operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; the operation saturation evaluation result set includes the operation saturation evaluation result and the associated operation saturation evaluation result.

[0153] In this optional embodiment, the first team operation related information of the team may optionally include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: information on the team's work leader, information on the team's work members, information on the team's operation mode and functional responsibilities, information on the operation mode and functional responsibilities of the team's department, information on the operation mode and functional responsibilities of the team's power supply bureau, information on the team's history and current responsible tasks, information on the team's own relevant level, and information on the team's resource allocation, etc., which are not limited in this embodiment of the present invention. Further optionally, the specific information content corresponding to the second team operation related information of the associated team set can refer to, but is not limited to, the first team operation related information of the team mentioned above, which will not be repeated here.

[0154] Optionally, the team identification can be any team code that can represent the team. The team code can represent only the team or can be a code that matches the team according to a certain classification condition, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention. Optionally, the identification type of the team identification can be a biometric identification type or a non-biometric identification type, wherein the non-biometric identification type can be a character type or a pattern type, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present invention.

[0155] Further optionally, the specific steps corresponding to the above-mentioned analysis of the first job saturation information, the third job saturation information and the job saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target job plan control result can refer to but are not limited to the above-mentioned analysis of the first job saturation information, the second job saturation information and the job saturation evaluation result to obtain the specific steps corresponding to the first target job plan control result, and the embodiments of the present invention do not limit this.

[0156] Optionally, the above-mentioned target associated team that meets the associated job saturation condition may include an associated team corresponding to a date with an associated job saturation less than or equal to a preset associated job saturation threshold within the team statistical date range in the target associated team set, and the date with an associated job saturation less than or equal to the preset associated job saturation threshold can fully control the job plan that needs to be controlled on the date that needs to be controlled. The embodiment of the present invention does not limit this.

[0157] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can provide another method for executing the control team's work plan for the situation where there is no controllable date for the same team within a certain time period. It can determine the associated team that meets the work correlation conditions and the associated work saturation conditions from the associated work teams as the target controllable team, and determine the matching control team work plan execution method based on various situation factors, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the team work plan control method, and then improving the control rationality and one-to-one correspondence of the team work plan control method, which is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the determined work plan control results.

[0158] Example 2

[0159] See also Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a flow chart of another method for evaluating the saturation of work based on the team work plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2 The described method can be applied to a device for evaluating the saturation of work based on a team work plan, wherein the device may include a server, wherein the server includes a local server or a cloud server, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Figure 2As shown in FIG, the operation saturation evaluation method based on the team operation plan control includes the following operations:

[0160] 201. Determine whether the current situation of the team within a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation evaluation conditions.

[0161] In an embodiment of the present invention, further optionally, when it is determined that the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period does not meet the operation saturation assessment condition, the above-mentioned operation of determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within the certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation assessment condition is triggered. Optionally, when it is determined that the operation saturation assessment condition is not met, the subsequent operation can be executed immediately or after a certain time period, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0162] 202. When it is determined that the current situation corresponding to the team in a certain time period meets the operation saturation evaluation conditions, the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in the certain time period is obtained.

[0163] 203. Determine the work saturation evaluation result of the team based on the work saturation calculation information and the pre-established work saturation evaluation model.

[0164] 204. Determine whether the operation saturation assessment results meet the pre-set operation plan control conditions.

[0165] 205. When it is determined that the operation saturation evaluation result meets the operation plan control conditions, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0166] In the embodiment of the present invention, for other descriptions of steps 202 to 205, please refer to the other detailed descriptions of steps 101 to 104 in the first embodiment, which will not be repeated in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0167] It can be seen that the embodiment of the present invention can combine the team's work saturation calculation information and the work saturation evaluation model to automatically calculate the team's work saturation evaluation result, and perform corresponding work plan control operations on the team's work plan based on the work saturation evaluation result. It can automatically measure the team's work saturation and thus intelligently adjust the team's work plan to achieve the intelligent automatic control function of the team's work plan, so that the team's work plan within a period can be evenly arranged, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and control rationality of the team's work plan, and further conducive to improving the effectiveness of the team's work plan control results. In addition, the calculated work saturation evaluation result can provide a reference basis for subsequent resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and management convenience of the team's work plan by managers, and to a certain extent helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation; it can also determine whether the work saturation evaluation conditions are met. If so, the subsequent work saturation evaluation operation is performed, which is conducive to improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the team's work plan control method, and further conducive to improving the control rationality of the team's work plan control method and improving the effectiveness of the determined work plan control results, and reducing unnecessary resource waste.

[0168] In an optional embodiment, the above-mentioned determination of whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the preset operation saturation evaluation conditions may include:

[0169] Detect whether a trigger instruction for the work saturation assessment of the team is received. When the detection result is yes, determine whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the pre-set work saturation assessment conditions; or,

[0170] Obtain the pre-assessment information corresponding to the team, and determine whether the pre-assessment information meets the pre-set assessment operation execution conditions. When the judgment result is yes, determine whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the operation saturation assessment conditions.

[0171] In this optional embodiment, optionally, the triggering method corresponding to the job saturation assessment trigger instruction may include but is not limited to one or more of triggering by mobile phone number, mini program triggering, mobile phone text message triggering, APP triggering, designated web page triggering, device triggering, etc., and is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0172] Further optionally, when it is detected that no job saturation assessment trigger instruction for the team is received, it is determined that the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period does not meet the pre-set job saturation assessment conditions.

[0173] Further optionally, when it is determined that the pre-assessment information does not meet the assessment operation execution condition, it is determined that the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period does not meet the operation saturation assessment condition.

[0174] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can determine whether the current situation meets the job saturation assessment conditions from two ways: detecting the receipt of job saturation assessment trigger conditions and judging whether the assessment operation execution conditions are met. This enriches the diversity of the methods for determining whether the job saturation assessment conditions are met, and improves the flexibility of the methods for determining whether the job saturation assessment conditions are met. This is beneficial to improving the efficiency of determining the results of determining whether the job saturation assessment conditions are met and to improving the comprehensiveness of the methods for determining whether the job saturation assessment conditions are met, as well as to being able to execute job saturation assessment operations and team job plan control operations in a timely manner, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the team job plan control method.

[0175] In another optional embodiment, the above-mentioned determination of whether the pre-evaluation information satisfies a preset evaluation operation execution condition may include:

[0176] If the pre-assessment information includes the total amount of work plans of the team within a certain time period, determining whether the total amount of work plans is greater than or equal to a preset threshold of the total amount of work plans; if the judgment result is yes, determining that the pre-assessment information meets the preset assessment operation execution condition;

[0177] If the pre-assessment information includes the interval time from the time when the team last performed the work plan control operation to the current time, determine whether the interval time is greater than or equal to the pre-set interval time threshold. When the judgment result is yes, it is determined that the pre-assessment information meets the evaluation operation execution conditions.

[0178] In this optional embodiment, further optionally, when it is determined that the total amount of the job plan is less than the total amount threshold of the job plan, it is determined that the pre-evaluation information does not meet the pre-set evaluation operation execution condition.

[0179] Further optionally, when it is determined that the interval duration is less than the interval duration threshold, it is determined that the pre-evaluation information does not meet the evaluation operation execution condition.

[0180] It can be seen that this optional embodiment can provide a matching method for determining the conditions for executing pre-assessment operations from two perspectives: the total amount of the work plan and the interval duration. This enriches the diversity of the methods for determining the conditions for executing pre-assessment operations, and improves the flexibility and comprehensiveness of the methods for determining the conditions for executing pre-assessment operations. This in turn improves the effectiveness and rationality of the results of determining the conditions for executing pre-assessment operations, and to a certain extent improves the comprehensiveness of the methods for determining the conditions for executing pre-assessment operations, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and rationality of the methods for controlling the work plan of the team.

[0181] In yet another optional embodiment, before determining the work saturation evaluation result of the team based on the work saturation calculation information and the pre-established work saturation evaluation model, the method may further include the following operations:

[0182] Obtain team operation resource allocation information and unit operation plan influencing factors information;

[0183] Analyze the influencing factor information to obtain the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the department and the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the team under the department; the unit includes one or more departments; the department includes one or more teams;

[0184] According to the team's operation resource allocation information, the team's operation input standard quota information is set; the team's operation input standard quota information includes the team's operation quota standard information and the team's operation number quota information;

[0185] Based on the standard quota information of operation input, the operation resource configuration information of the team, the operation saturation threshold and the pre-set saturation evaluation algorithm, an operation saturation evaluation model corresponding to the team is established; the saturation evaluation algorithm includes the team leader saturation evaluation algorithm and the team member saturation evaluation algorithm.

[0186] In this optional embodiment, optionally, the team operation resource configuration information may include but is not limited to one or more of the following: existing work team information, current team leader information corresponding to different teams, current team member information corresponding to different teams, team operator number information corresponding to different teams, team department information corresponding to different teams, and power supply bureau information corresponding to different teams, etc., and the embodiment of the present invention does not limit this.

[0187] Optionally, the influencing factor information may include, but is not limited to, one or more of seasonal characteristic factor information, operation period factor information, and operation method change factor information, and the embodiment of the present invention does not limit this.

[0188] Optionally, the team's job saturation assessment model may include but is not limited to one or more of a team job resource configuration module, a job input standard quota configuration module, a saturation threshold setting module, a team workload automatic collection module, and a saturation automatic analysis module, etc., which are not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Further, the team workload automatic collection module includes a pre-test operation module and / or a scheduled inspection operation module, which are not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Further, the saturation automatic analysis module includes a team leader saturation calculation and analysis module and / or a team member saturation calculation and analysis module, which are not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Further, the job input standard quota configuration module may include job input standard quota information, and the job input standard quota configuration module also includes a work category module and / or a work mode module, which are not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0189] Optionally, the work category may include but is not limited to one or more of installation / replacement type, pre-test category, scheduled inspection category, maintenance category, live category, fault elimination category, maintenance category, measurement category, operation category, inspection category, acceptance category, cooperation (production) category and other (production) categories, etc., and is not limited in the embodiments of the present invention.

[0190] In the above optional embodiment, further optionally, the calculation formula corresponding to the above job saturation evaluation algorithm is as follows:

[0191] The number of operating personnel refers to the number of team leaders or team members.

[0192] Optionally, when evaluating the saturation of team leaders, the corresponding job saturation evaluation algorithm is

[0193] Optionally, when evaluating team member saturation, the corresponding job saturation evaluation algorithm is

[0194] It can be seen that this optional embodiment provides a way to establish a work saturation assessment model for a work team, enriches the intelligent function of the work saturation assessment device based on the work team work plan control, is conducive to improving the comprehensiveness and rationality of the work saturation assessment method and thus improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the work team work plan control method, and is conducive to improving the control rationality and control efficiency of the work team work plan control method, and to a certain extent can improve the effectiveness of the determined work saturation assessment results to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the determined work team work plan control results.

[0195] Example 3

[0196] See also Figure 3 , Figure 3This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a device for evaluating the saturation of work based on the control of team work plan disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 The described device may include a server, wherein the server includes a local server or a cloud server, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, the operation saturation evaluation device based on team operation plan control may include:

[0197] The information acquisition module 301 is used to obtain the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period.

[0198] The evaluation result determination module 302 is used to determine the operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and the pre-established operation saturation evaluation model.

[0199] The judgment module 303 is used to judge whether the operation saturation evaluation result meets the preset operation plan control conditions.

[0200] The operation plan control module 304 is used to perform operation plan control operations on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result when the judgment module 303 determines that the operation saturation evaluation result meets the operation plan control conditions, so as to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0201] It can be seen that implementation Figure 3 The described operation saturation assessment device based on team operation plan control can combine the team's operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment model to automatically calculate the team's operation saturation assessment result, and perform corresponding operation plan control operations on the team's operation plan according to the operation saturation assessment result. It can automatically measure the team's operation saturation and intelligently adjust the team's operation plan to realize the intelligent automatic control function of the team's operation plan, so that the team's operation plan within a period of time can be arranged evenly, which is conducive to improving the control efficiency and rationality of the team's operation plan, and thus is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the team's operation plan control results. In addition, the calculated operation saturation assessment result can provide a reference basis for later resource allocation, which is conducive to improving the management efficiency and convenience of management personnel for the team's operation plan, and to a certain extent helps to reasonably allocate team resources and equipment to ensure continuous, stable and safe operation.

[0202] In an optional embodiment, the judgment module 303 judges whether the job saturation evaluation result meets the preset job plan control condition in the following manner:

[0203] Based on the activity saturation assessment results, determine whether there is a target date within a certain time period where the activity saturation is greater than or equal to a pre-set activity saturation threshold. If the judgment result is yes, it is determined that the activity saturation assessment results meet the pre-set activity planning and control conditions. A certain time period includes multiple dates; each date corresponds to an activity saturation level.

[0204] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can determine whether a target date exists within a certain time period based on the results of the operation saturation assessment. If so, it is determined that the operation plan control conditions are met, which is conducive to improving the rationality of the results of the determined operation plan control conditions, and further helps to improve the rationality and accuracy of the control of the team's operation plan.

[0205] In another optional embodiment, the determination module 303 determines whether there is a target date within a certain time period in which the operation saturation is greater than or equal to a preset operation saturation threshold based on the operation saturation evaluation result, specifically including:

[0206] For each date included in a certain time period, based on the staff saturation included in the job saturation assessment result, determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to a predetermined staff saturation threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that there is a target date in the certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the predetermined job saturation threshold; wherein, the target date includes the date in which the staff saturation is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold; the staff saturation includes the person in charge saturation and / or the member saturation.

[0207] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold. If so, it determines that a target date exists within a certain time period, which is conducive to improving the rationality of the determined target date existence result to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of the target date existence result, and thus is conducive to improving the rationality and effectiveness of the results of meeting the work plan control conditions, as well as improving the rationality and logic of the team work plan control plan.

[0208] In another optional embodiment, the operation plan control module 304 performs an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result, and obtains the operation plan information of the team after the control in a specific manner including:

[0209] Detect whether a job plan control trigger instruction is received; when the detection result is yes, perform a job plan control operation on the job plan information included in the job plan control trigger instruction and the job saturation evaluation result, and obtain the job plan information of the team after control; or

[0210] Based on the result of the job saturation assessment, determine whether there are adjustable dates within a certain time period. If the judgment result is yes, determine the first job saturation information corresponding to the date that needs to be adjusted and the second job saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the job saturation calculation information and the job saturation assessment result. The date that needs to be adjusted is one or more dates within a certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the job saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within a certain time period in which the job saturation is less than the job saturation threshold.

[0211] Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the first target operation plan control result;

[0212] According to the first target operation plan control result, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information of the control-required control date included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control.

[0213] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also determine the execution operation corresponding to the job plan control method through two methods: manually triggered job plan control trigger instructions or automatic analysis of job saturation assessment results by the system, enriching the diversity of job plan control methods and improving the flexibility and optionality of job plan control methods, thereby improving the rationality of job plan control methods, which is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the job plan information after control and improving the control efficiency of the job plan information.

[0214] In another optional embodiment, the operation plan control module 304 analyzes the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the first target operation plan control result in the following manner:

[0215] For each date requiring control, the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring control is analyzed to obtain the control emergency situation of the date requiring control; when the control emergency situation is used to indicate that the control urgency of the date requiring control is greater than or equal to a preset control urgency threshold, the date interval between the date requiring control and each adjustable date is calculated, and based on all date interval values, a target adjustable date with a date interval value less than or equal to the date interval value threshold is determined as the first target operation plan control result; or

[0216] For each date requiring adjustment, the first activity saturation information corresponding to the date requiring adjustment is analyzed to obtain the activity importance corresponding to the date requiring adjustment; when the activity importance is greater than or equal to a predetermined activity importance threshold, the configuration matching degree between the date requiring adjustment and each adjustable date is calculated based on the first activity saturation information and the second activity saturation information, and a target adjustable date having a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching degree threshold is determined based on all configuration matching degrees as the first target activity plan adjustment result;

[0217] The target adjustable date is the date used to adjust the work plan corresponding to the adjustable date.

[0218] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also provide a matching method for determining the first target operation plan control result from two perspectives: the control urgency of the control date and the importance of the operation on the control date, thereby enriching the diversity of the method for determining the first target operation plan control result and improving the flexibility and selectivity of the method for determining the first target operation plan control result, thereby improving the effectiveness and rationality of the determined first target operation plan control result, which is conducive to improving the rationality and comprehensiveness of the operation saturation evaluation method based on the team operation plan control, and is conducive to improving the control effectiveness and efficiency of the team operation plan.

[0219] In another optional embodiment, the judgment module 303 is also used to judge whether the current situation corresponding to the team in a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation assessment conditions. When the judgment result is yes, the information acquisition module 301 is triggered to execute the above-mentioned operation of obtaining the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period.

[0220] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also determine whether the operation saturation assessment conditions are met. If so, it will perform subsequent operation saturation assessment operations, which is conducive to improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the team's operation plan control method, and thus is conducive to improving the control rationality of the team's operation plan control method and improving the effectiveness of the determined operation plan control results, as well as reducing unnecessary waste of resources.

[0221] In another optional embodiment, the judgment module 303 judges whether the current situation of the team within a certain time period meets the preset operation saturation evaluation conditions in the following manner:

[0222] Detect whether a trigger instruction for the work saturation assessment of the team is received. When the detection result is yes, determine whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the pre-set work saturation assessment conditions; or,

[0223] Obtain the pre-assessment information corresponding to the team, and determine whether the pre-assessment information meets the pre-set assessment operation execution conditions. When the judgment result is yes, determine whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the operation saturation assessment conditions.

[0224] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also determine whether the current situation meets the operation saturation assessment conditions by detecting the trigger conditions for receiving the operation saturation assessment and judging whether the conditions for executing the assessment operation are met. This enriches the diversity of the methods for determining whether the operation saturation assessment conditions are met, and improves the flexibility of the methods for determining whether the operation saturation assessment conditions are met. This is conducive to improving the efficiency of determining the results of determining whether the operation saturation assessment conditions are met and to improving the comprehensiveness of the methods for determining whether the operation saturation assessment conditions are met, as well as to being able to execute the operation saturation assessment operation and the team operation plan control operation in a timely manner, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and control effectiveness of the team operation plan control method.

[0225] In another optional embodiment, the manner in which the determination module 303 determines whether the pre-evaluation information satisfies a preset evaluation operation execution condition specifically includes:

[0226] If the pre-assessment information includes the total amount of work plans of the team within a certain time period, determining whether the total amount of work plans is greater than or equal to a preset threshold of the total amount of work plans; if the judgment result is yes, determining that the pre-assessment information meets the preset assessment operation execution condition;

[0227] If the pre-assessment information includes the interval time from the time when the team last performed the work plan control operation to the current time, determine whether the interval time is greater than or equal to the pre-set interval time threshold. When the judgment result is yes, it is determined that the pre-assessment information meets the evaluation operation execution conditions.

[0228] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also provide matching methods for determining the execution conditions of pre-assessment operations based on the two perspectives of the total amount of work plans and the interval duration, thereby enriching the diversity of methods for determining the execution conditions of pre-assessment operations and improving the flexibility and comprehensiveness of methods for determining the execution conditions of pre-assessment operations, thereby improving the effectiveness and rationality of the results of determining the execution conditions of pre-assessment operations, and to a certain extent improving the comprehensiveness of methods for determining the execution conditions of pre-assessment operations, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and rationality of the team work plan control method.

[0229] In yet another optional embodiment, the job plan control module 304 is further configured to:

[0230] When it is determined that there is no adjustable date within a certain time period, the associated team set corresponding to the team is determined according to the team ID of the team; the associated team set includes associated teams corresponding to one or more teams;

[0231] Obtaining the first team operation related information corresponding to the team and the second team operation related information corresponding to the associated team set, and analyzing the first team operation related information and the second team operation related information to obtain the work correlation between the team and each associated team;

[0232] Screening out at least one target work correlation degree whose work correlation degree is greater than or equal to a preset work correlation degree threshold from all work correlation degrees, and determining a target correlation team set corresponding to the at least one target work correlation degree;

[0233] Obtaining associated operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the target associated team set, and determining associated operation saturation evaluation results corresponding to each associated team included in the target associated team set in a certain time period based on the associated operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model;

[0234] According to the saturation evaluation results of all associated operations, the target associated teams that meet the associated operation saturation conditions are determined from the target associated team set;

[0235] Obtain the third operation saturation information corresponding to the target associated team, and analyze the first operation saturation information, the third operation saturation information and the operation saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target operation plan control result, and according to the second target operation plan control result, perform the operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; the operation saturation evaluation result set includes the operation saturation evaluation result and the associated operation saturation evaluation result.

[0236] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also provide another method for executing the control team's work plan in the case where there is no controllable date for the same team within a certain time period. It can determine the associated work team that meets the work correlation condition and the associated work saturation condition from the associated work teams as the target controllable team, and determine the matching control team work plan execution method based on various situation factors, thereby improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the team work plan control method, and then improving the control rationality and one-to-one correspondence of the team work plan control method, which is conducive to improving the effectiveness of the determined work plan control results.

[0237] In another optional embodiment, the information acquisition module 301 is also used to obtain the team's job resource configuration information and the unit's influencing factor information for the job plan before the evaluation result determination module 302 determines the team's job saturation evaluation result based on the job saturation calculation information and a pre-established job saturation evaluation model.

[0238] like Figure 4 As shown, the device may also include:

[0239] The analysis module 305 is used to analyze the influencing factor information to obtain the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the department and the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the team under the department; the unit includes one or more departments; the department includes one or more teams.

[0240] The information setting module 306 is used to set the team's operation input standard quota information according to the team's operation resource configuration information; the team's operation input standard quota information includes the team's operation quota standard information and the team's operation number quota information.

[0241] The model building module 307 is used to establish a work saturation assessment model corresponding to the team based on the work input standard quota information, the team work resource configuration information, the work saturation threshold and the pre-set saturation assessment algorithm; the saturation assessment algorithm includes the team leader saturation assessment algorithm and the team member saturation assessment algorithm.

[0242] The calculation formula corresponding to the job saturation evaluation algorithm is as follows:

[0243] The number of operating personnel refers to the number of team leaders or team members.

[0244] It can be seen that implementation Figure 4 The described device can also provide a function of establishing a work saturation assessment model for a work team, enriching the intelligent function of the work saturation assessment device based on the work team work plan control, which is conducive to improving the comprehensiveness and rationality of the work saturation assessment method and thus improving the comprehensiveness and integrity of the work team work plan control method, as well as helping to improve the rationality and efficiency of the control of the work team work plan control method. To a certain extent, it can improve the effectiveness of the determined work saturation assessment results to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the determined work team work plan control results.

[0245] Example 4

[0246] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 This is a structural diagram of another operation saturation evaluation device based on team operation plan control disclosed in an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5The described device may include a server, wherein the server includes a local server or a cloud server, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention. Figure 5 As shown, the device may include:

[0247] A memory 401 storing executable program code;

[0248] a processor 402 coupled to the memory 401;

[0249] Furthermore, it may also include an input interface 403 and an output interface 404 coupled to the processor 402;

[0250] The processor 402 calls the executable program code stored in the memory 401 to execute the steps of the method for evaluating the work saturation based on the team work plan control described in the first or second embodiment.

[0251] Example 5

[0252] An embodiment of the present invention discloses a computer-readable storage medium that stores a computer program for electronic data exchange, wherein the computer program enables a computer to execute the steps of the method for evaluating job saturation based on team job planning control described in Example 1 or Example 2.

[0253] Example 6

[0254] An embodiment of the present invention discloses a computer program product, which includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, and the computer program is operable to enable a computer to execute the steps in the operation saturation assessment method based on team operation plan control described in Example 1 or Example 2.

[0255] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative, wherein the modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as modules may or may not be physical modules, i.e., they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network modules. Some or all of the modules may be selected based on actual needs to achieve the objectives of the present embodiment. Those skilled in the art can understand and implement the present invention without inventive effort.

[0256] Through the detailed description of the above embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each embodiment can be implemented by means of software plus the necessary general hardware platform, or of course, by means of hardware. Based on this understanding, the above technical solution, in essence, or the portion that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, including a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a programmable read-only memory (PROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), a one-time programmable read-only memory (OTPROM), an electronically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disc storage, magnetic disk storage, magnetic tape storage, or any other computer-readable medium capable of carrying or storing data.

[0257] Finally, it should be noted that the method and device for evaluating job saturation based on team job plan control disclosed in the embodiment of the present invention are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments can still be modified, or some of the technical features therein can be replaced by equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the various embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining operation saturation calculation information corresponding to a team in a certain time period, and determining an operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model; Determining whether the operation saturation assessment result meets the pre-set operation plan control conditions; When the judgment result is yes, performing an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result, and obtaining the operation plan information of the team after control; Furthermore, according to the operation saturation evaluation result, the operation plan control operation is performed on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the adjusted operation plan information of the team, including: Based on the operation saturation assessment result, determine whether there are adjustable dates within the certain time period; when the judgment result is yes, determine the first operation saturation information corresponding to the required adjustment date and the second operation saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment result; the required adjustment date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is greater than or equal to the operation saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is less than the operation saturation threshold; Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result; According to the first target operation plan control result, performing an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the adjustment date included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the adjusted operation plan information of the team; Furthermore, the analyzing of the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result includes: For each of the adjustment-required dates, analyzing the first job saturation information corresponding to the adjustment-required date to obtain the importance of the job corresponding to the adjustment-required date; When the importance of the job is greater than or equal to a predetermined job importance threshold, calculating the configuration matching degree between the required adjustment date and each of the adjustable dates based on the first job saturation information and the second job saturation information, and determining a target adjustable date with a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching degree threshold based on all the configuration matching degrees as the first target job plan adjustment result; When the importance of the operation is less than a predetermined operation importance threshold, calculating a first date interval between the required adjustment date and each of the adjustable dates, and determining a target adjustable date whose first date interval value is less than or equal to the first date interval value threshold based on all the first date interval values ​​as a first target operation plan adjustment result; And, the method further comprises: When at least two target adjustable dates that meet the configuration matching degree filtering conditions or the date interval value filtering conditions are determined, based on the configuration matching degree and / or the date interval value corresponding to each target adjustable date, the target adjustable date that can complete the determined operation plan to be adjusted is determined from all the target adjustable dates through the preset configuration matching degree high and low sorting filtering conditions and / or the preset date interval sorting filtering conditions, as the first target operation plan control result.

2. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The determining whether the operation saturation evaluation result satisfies a preset operation plan control condition includes: Based on the operation saturation evaluation result, determining whether there is a target date within the certain time period in which the operation saturation is greater than or equal to a preset operation saturation threshold, and if the determination result is yes, determining that the operation saturation evaluation result satisfies the preset operation plan control condition; the certain time period includes multiple dates; each of the dates corresponds to an operation saturation; The step of determining, based on the job saturation evaluation result, whether there is a target date within the certain time period where the job saturation is greater than or equal to a preset job saturation threshold, includes: For each of the dates included in the certain time period, based on the staff saturation included in the job saturation assessment result, determine whether the staff saturation corresponding to the date is greater than or equal to a predetermined staff saturation threshold; when the judgment result is yes, determine that there is a target date in the certain time period in which the job saturation is greater than or equal to the predetermined job saturation threshold; wherein, the target date includes a date in which the staff saturation is greater than or equal to the staff saturation threshold; the staff saturation includes person in charge saturation and / or member saturation.

3. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The method further includes performing an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control, and further includes: Check whether a job plan control trigger instruction is received; when the detection result is yes, perform a job plan control operation on the job plan information included in the job plan control trigger instruction and the job saturation assessment result, and obtain the job plan information of the team after control.

4. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to claim 1, characterized in that: The analyzing the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result further includes: For each of the dates requiring control, analyzing the first operation saturation information corresponding to the date requiring control to obtain the control urgency of the date requiring control; when the control urgency indicates that the control urgency of the date requiring control is greater than or equal to a preset control urgency threshold, calculating the date interval between the date requiring control and each of the adjustable dates, and determining, based on all the date interval values, a target adjustable date having a date interval value less than or equal to the date interval value threshold as the first target operation plan control result; The target adjustable date is a date used to adjust the work plan corresponding to the adjustable date.

5. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to claim 4 is characterized in that: The method further comprises: Determine whether the current situation of the team in a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation evaluation conditions. If the judgment result is yes, trigger the execution of the operation of obtaining the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in the certain time period; The determination of whether the current situation of the team within a certain time period meets the pre-set operation saturation evaluation conditions includes: Detecting whether a trigger instruction for the work saturation assessment of the team is received, and when the detection result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the preset work saturation assessment conditions; or, Obtaining pre-assessment information corresponding to the team, and determining whether the pre-assessment information meets a pre-set assessment operation execution condition, and when the determination result is yes, determining whether the current situation corresponding to the team within a certain time period meets the operation saturation assessment condition; Furthermore, determining whether the pre-assessment information satisfies a preset assessment operation execution condition includes: If the pre-assessment information includes the total amount of work plans of the team within a certain time period, determining whether the total amount of work plans is greater than or equal to a preset total amount threshold of work plans, and if the judgment result is yes, determining that the pre-assessment information meets the preset assessment operation execution condition; If the pre-evaluation information includes the interval time from the time when the team last performed the work plan control operation to the current time, determine whether the interval time is greater than or equal to a pre-set interval time threshold. When the judgment result is yes, determine that the pre-evaluation information meets the evaluation operation execution conditions.

6. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The method further comprises: When it is determined that the adjustable date does not exist within the certain time period, determining the associated team set corresponding to the team according to the team identifier of the team; the associated team set includes one or more associated teams corresponding to the team; Obtaining first team operation related information corresponding to the team and second team operation related information corresponding to the associated team set, and analyzing the first team operation related information and the second team operation related information to obtain a work correlation degree between the team and each of the associated teams; Screening out at least one target work correlation degree whose work correlation degree is greater than or equal to a preset work correlation degree threshold from all the work correlation degrees, and determining a target correlation team set corresponding to the at least one target work correlation degree; Obtaining associated operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the target associated team set, and determining an associated operation saturation evaluation result corresponding to the certain time period for each associated team included in the target associated team set based on the associated operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation evaluation model; According to the saturation evaluation results of all the associated operations, determining the target associated team that meets the associated operation saturation condition from the target associated team set; Obtain the third operation saturation information corresponding to the target associated team, and analyze the first operation saturation information, the third operation saturation information and the operation saturation evaluation result set to obtain the second target operation plan control result, and according to the second target operation plan control result, perform the operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the date to be controlled included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; the operation saturation evaluation result set includes the operation saturation evaluation result and the associated operation saturation evaluation result.

7. The method for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control according to any one of claims 4 to 6, characterized in that: Before determining the operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model, the method further includes: Obtain team operation resource allocation information and unit operation plan influencing factors information; Analyze the influencing factor information to obtain the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the department and the operation saturation threshold corresponding to the team under the department; the unit includes one or more departments; the department includes one or more teams; According to the team operation resource configuration information, the team operation input standard quota information is set; the team operation input standard quota information includes the team operation quota standard information and the team operation number quota information; Establishing an operation saturation assessment model corresponding to the team based on the operation input standard quota information, the team operation resource configuration information, the operation saturation threshold, and a pre-set saturation assessment algorithm; the saturation assessment algorithm includes a team leader saturation assessment algorithm and a team member saturation assessment algorithm; The calculation formula corresponding to the job saturation evaluation algorithm is as follows: ; The number of operating personnel refers to the number of team leaders or team members.

8. A device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control, characterized in that: The device comprises: The information acquisition module is used to obtain the operation saturation calculation information corresponding to the team in a certain time period; An evaluation result determination module, configured to determine the operation saturation evaluation result of the team based on the operation saturation calculation information and a pre-established operation saturation evaluation model; A judgment module, used to judge whether the operation saturation evaluation result meets the preset operation plan control conditions; an operation plan control module, configured to, when the judgment module determines that the operation saturation evaluation result satisfies the operation plan control condition, perform an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result, and obtain the operation plan information of the team after control; Furthermore, the operation plan control module performs an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information included in the operation saturation calculation information according to the operation saturation evaluation result, and obtains the operation plan information of the team after control in a manner specifically including: Based on the operation saturation assessment result, determine whether there are adjustable dates within the certain time period; when the judgment result is yes, determine the first operation saturation information corresponding to the required adjustment date and the second operation saturation information corresponding to the adjustable date based on the operation saturation calculation information and the operation saturation assessment result; the required adjustment date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is greater than or equal to the operation saturation threshold; the adjustable date is one or more dates within the certain time period when the operation saturation is less than the operation saturation threshold; Analyze the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result; According to the first target operation plan control result, performing an operation plan control operation on the operation plan information of the adjustment date included in the operation saturation calculation information to obtain the adjusted operation plan information of the team; Furthermore, the operation plan control module analyzes the first operation saturation information, the second operation saturation information, and the operation saturation evaluation result to obtain a first target operation plan control result, specifically including: For each of the adjustment-required dates, analyzing the first job saturation information corresponding to the adjustment-required date to obtain the importance of the job corresponding to the adjustment-required date; When the importance of the job is greater than or equal to a predetermined job importance threshold, calculating the configuration matching degree between the required adjustment date and each of the adjustable dates based on the first job saturation information and the second job saturation information, and determining a target adjustable date with a configuration matching degree greater than or equal to the configuration matching degree threshold based on all the configuration matching degrees as the first target job plan adjustment result; When the importance of the operation is less than a predetermined operation importance threshold, a first date interval between the required adjustment date and each of the adjustable dates is calculated, and a target adjustable date whose first date interval value is less than or equal to the first date interval value threshold is determined based on all the first date interval values ​​as a first target operation plan adjustment result; In addition, the job plan control module is also used to, when at least two target adjustable dates that meet the configuration matching degree filtering conditions or the date interval value filtering conditions are determined, determine, based on the configuration matching degree and / or date interval value corresponding to each target adjustable date, the target adjustable date that can complete the determined job plan to be controlled from all the target adjustable dates through the preset configuration matching degree high and low sorting filtering conditions and / or the preset date interval sorting filtering conditions, as the first target job plan control result.

9. A device for evaluating work saturation based on team work plan control, characterized in that: The device comprises: a memory storing executable program code; a processor coupled to the memory; The processor calls the executable program code stored in the memory to execute the operation saturation assessment method based on team operation plan control as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer storage medium, characterized in that The computer storage medium stores computer instructions, and when the computer instructions are called, they are used to execute the operation saturation assessment method based on team operation plan control as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images