A method for intelligent generation of debugging steps based on state detection

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection. The method comprises the following steps: before debugging an equipment, performing equipment detection, predicting the possible safety risks and debugging results of the debugging process, and performing secondary rationalization modification on the pre-generated debugging steps to form final debugging steps, thereby reducing the workload of debugging personnel and the possible safety hazards in the debugging process. At the same time, a debugging result is predicted, thereby improving the accuracy of the debugging result and the integrity of the scheme. The detection of the switch state of the power detection interface can ensure that no detection and debugging of each electrical component is missed during the detection and debugging process. The working state detection of the electrical equipment can know the fault condition of the electrical equipment in advance, predict the debugging result, and improve the efficiency of the debugging work. The equipment is clearly divided into levels, and the priorities of equipment detection and equipment debugging are distinguished. The rapid and accurate generation of debugging steps is improved by improving the generation efficiency of the detection scheme.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of power detection, and in particular to a method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection. Background Art

[0002] Power transmission is becoming increasingly crucial to modern life, and as a result, the importance of testing the operating status of power equipment and pre-operation commissioning is also increasing. Therefore, before commissioning power equipment, personnel often plan and design the overall process before conducting testing and commissioning work. However, ad hoc power system commissioning planning is time-consuming, and the sequence of designed commissioning methods can affect the actual commissioning work due to the complexity of the power equipment being commissioned, resulting in low efficiency and difficulty in implementation.

[0003] For example, a "method for on-site equipment debugging based on radio communication" disclosed in Chinese patent documents includes the following problems: the actual debugging process is complicated, the status of the electrical equipment is not checked before the debugging process, dangerous situations may easily occur during the debugging process, threatening the safety of the workers, and the debugging plan is difficult to implement. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The present invention aims to overcome the problems in the prior art that the status of the equipment is not detected before debugging, dangerous situations may easily occur during the debugging process, threatening the safety of the staff, the generation process of the debugging plan requires a lot of manual participation, the degree of intelligence is not high, and the implementation of the debugging plan is relatively difficult. The present invention provides a method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on status detection.

[0005] In order to achieve the above technical objectives, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

[0006] A method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection, comprising the following steps:

[0007] Step S1: Performing status detection on the power equipment to be detected by the detection equipment;

[0008] Step S2: partitioning and classifying the internal structure of the power equipment to be tested;

[0009] Step S3: pre-generating the debugging steps according to the state detection of the power equipment to be detected after zoning and classification;

[0010] Step S4: After the debugging steps are pre-generated, the pre-generated debugging steps are input into the solution risk assessment unit, the debugging solution is risk-estimated and debugging results are pre-generated, and the pre-generated debugging solution is rationally modified to form a final debugging solution.

[0011] Before debugging the equipment, the equipment should be inspected, and the possible safety risks and debugging results of the debugging process should be estimated. At the same time, the pre-generated debugging steps should be rationalized and modified for a second time to form the final debugging steps, which will reduce the workload of the debugging personnel and reduce the possible safety hazards in the debugging process. At the same time, an estimate of the debugging results should be made to improve the accuracy of the debugging results and the completeness of the plan.

[0012] Preferably, the detection content of step S1 includes the switch status of the power detection interface of the power system and the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system.

[0013] The detection of the switch status of the power detection interface can ensure that no electrical component is missed during the detection and debugging process. The working status detection of electrical equipment can know the fault situation of electrical equipment in advance, estimate the debugging results, and improve the debugging efficiency.

[0014] Preferably, the process of detecting the switch status of the power detection interface of the power system in the step includes the following steps:

[0015] Step S1-1-1: Connect the electrical signals of M power devices to be tested, number them, and connect them to the testing device;

[0016] Step S1-1-2: numbering the N power detection interface switches to be detected on each power device to be detected;

[0017] Step S1-1-3: Perform the first round of scanning and identification of the power detection interface switches to be detected, confirm the closed state of the switches, and mark the power detection interface switches to be detected that are initially closed with a signal mark;

[0018] Step S1-1-4: forcibly closing the power detection interface switch to be detected that was not closed in step S1-1-3;

[0019] Step S1-1-5: performing a second round of scanning and identification on the forcibly closed power detection interface switch to be detected;

[0020] Step S1-1-6: Complete the scanning and identification of the power detection interface switches to be detected, and restore all the power detection interface switches to be detected to the state before the first round of scanning and identification.

[0021] Preferably, the process of detecting the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system includes the following steps:

[0022] Step S1-2-1: Connect K electrical components to be tested in the power system into a one-way circuit, and set a signal input and a signal output;

[0023] Step S1-2-2: numbering each electrical component to be tested in the unidirectional circuit in step S1-2-1;

[0024] Step S1-2-3: Perform linear detection of the electrical component to be detected based on the number, starting from the signal input and ending at the signal output, and input the detection results into the statistical matrix P;

[0025] Step S1-2-4: After determining the fault location, first collect the working status of the electrical component to be detected in normal operation to form the image to be identified U1, and then collect the current, voltage, electric power, and working heat at the fault location to form the image to be identified U2. By comparing the image to be identified U1 and the image to be identified U2, the fault information of the electrical component to be detected is checked and confirmed.

[0026] After the image comparison is completed, the image to be identified can be stored to facilitate subsequent detection and function debugging of the same electrical equipment.

[0027] Preferably, step S2 includes the following steps:

[0028] Step S2-1: Divide the image U1 or U2 of the electrical equipment to be identified in the power system into several areas. Use horizontal and vertical lines to divide the template image into multiple rectangular image blocks to be identified. Label the image blocks 1 to C from left to right and from top to bottom. Correlate the positions of the image blocks in the original image U1 or U2 with the normal working state or faulty working state of the corresponding electrical component. If the electrical component is in normal working state, use the color blocks in the image U1 as a reference to mark the color blocks of the electrical component to be identified in normal working state after troubleshooting, and determine its working state.

[0029] Step S2-2: Classify the electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and detection difficulty.

[0030] Preferably, in step S2-2, the grading process is specifically as follows: all electrical equipment are divided into 4 levels, among which electrical equipment with high importance and high detection difficulty is Class A, electrical equipment with high importance and low detection difficulty is Class B; electrical equipment with low importance and high detection difficulty is Class C, and electrical equipment with low importance and low detection difficulty is Class D.

[0031] Clarify the equipment classification levels, distinguish the priorities of equipment testing and equipment debugging, facilitate the formulation of testing plans, and improve the rapid and accurate generation of debugging steps by improving the efficiency of testing plan generation.

[0032] Preferably, step S4 includes the following steps:

[0033] Step S4-1: Pre-generate debugging steps based on the classification of electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and difficulty of detection. All electrical equipment is tested in the order of A, B, C, and D. Based on the test results, the equipment is debugged in the order of A, B, C, and D.

[0034] Step S4-2: Input the detection sequence of step S4-1 into the solution risk estimation unit, estimate the debugging steps, and rationally modify the pre-generated debugging steps according to the connection status of the electrical equipment;

[0035] Step S4-3: Output the debugging steps after the rationalization modification is completed and store them in the data storage module of the detection equipment.

[0036] Therefore, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0037] Before debugging, equipment testing is performed to estimate the possible safety risks and debugging results during the debugging process. At the same time, the pre-generated debugging steps are rationalized and modified twice to form the final debugging steps, which reduces the workload of the debugging personnel and reduces the possible safety hazards in the debugging process. At the same time, an estimate of the debugging results is made to improve the accuracy of the debugging results and the completeness of the plan;

[0038] The detection of the switch status of the power detection interface can ensure that no electrical component is missed during the detection and debugging process. The working status detection of electrical equipment can detect the fault of electrical equipment in advance, estimate the debugging results, and improve the debugging efficiency.

[0039] Clarify the equipment classification levels, distinguish the priorities of equipment testing and equipment debugging, facilitate the formulation of testing plans, and improve the rapid and accurate generation of debugging steps by improving the efficiency of testing plan generation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0040] Figure 1 is a flow chart of the step generation method of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the debugging solution generation structure of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0042] The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to specific embodiments.

[0043] Example 1

[0044] like Figure 1 Shown is a flow chart of the step generation method of the present invention.

[0045] Specifically including the following steps: including the following steps:

[0046] Step S1: Performing status detection on the power equipment to be detected by the detection equipment;

[0047] Step S2: partitioning and classifying the internal structure of the power equipment to be tested;

[0048] Step S3: pre-generating the debugging steps according to the state detection of the power equipment to be detected after zoning and classification;

[0049] Step S4: After the debugging steps are pre-generated, the pre-generated debugging steps are input into the solution risk assessment unit, the debugging solution is risk-estimated and debugging results are pre-generated, and the pre-generated debugging solution is rationally modified to form a final debugging solution.

[0050] Before debugging the equipment, the equipment should be inspected, and the possible safety risks and debugging results of the debugging process should be estimated. At the same time, the pre-generated debugging steps should be rationalized and modified for a second time to form the final debugging steps, which will reduce the workload of the debugging personnel and reduce the possible safety hazards in the debugging process. At the same time, an estimate of the debugging results should be made to improve the accuracy of the debugging results and the completeness of the plan.

[0051] Preferably, the detection content of step S1 includes the switch status of the power detection interface of the power system and the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system.

[0052] The detection of the switch status of the power detection interface can ensure that no electrical component is missed during the detection and debugging process. The working status detection of electrical equipment can know the fault situation of electrical equipment in advance, estimate the debugging results, and improve the debugging efficiency.

[0053] Preferably, the process of detecting the switch status of the power detection interface of the power system in the step includes the following steps:

[0054] Step S1-1-1: Connect the electrical signals of M power devices to be tested, number them, and connect them to the testing device;

[0055] Step S1-1-2: numbering the N power detection interface switches to be detected on each power device to be detected;

[0056] Step S1-1-3: Perform the first round of scanning and identification of the power detection interface switches to be detected, confirm the closed state of the switches, and mark the power detection interface switches to be detected that are initially closed with a signal mark;

[0057] Step S1-1-4: forcibly closing the power detection interface switch to be detected that was not closed in step S3;

[0058] Step S1-1-5: performing a second round of scanning and identification on the forcibly closed power detection interface switch to be detected;

[0059] Step S1-1-6: Complete the scanning and identification of the power detection interface switches to be detected, and restore all the power detection interface switches to be detected to the state before the first round of scanning and identification.

[0060] Preferably, the process of detecting the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system includes the following steps:

[0061] Step S1-2-1: Connect K electrical components to be tested in the power system into a one-way circuit, and set a signal input and a signal output;

[0062] Step S1-2-2: numbering each electrical component to be detected in the unidirectional circuit in step S1-2-1;

[0063] Step S1-2-3: Perform linear detection of the electrical component to be detected based on the number, starting from the signal input and ending at the signal output, and input the detection results into the statistical matrix P;

[0064] Step S1-2-4: After determining the fault location, first collect the working status of the electrical component to be detected in normal operation to form the image to be identified U1, and then collect the current, voltage, electric power, and working heat at the fault location to form the image to be identified U2. By comparing the image to be identified U1 and the image to be identified U2, the fault information of the electrical component to be detected is checked and confirmed.

[0065] After the image comparison is completed, the image to be identified can be stored to facilitate subsequent detection and function debugging of the same electrical equipment.

[0066] Preferably, step S2 includes the following steps:

[0067] Step S2-1: Divide the image U1 or U2 of the electrical equipment to be identified in the power system into several areas. Use horizontal and vertical lines to divide the template image into multiple rectangular image blocks to be identified. Label the image blocks 1 to C from left to right and from top to bottom. Correlate the positions of the image blocks in the original image U1 or U2 with the normal working state or faulty working state of the corresponding electrical component. If the electrical component is in normal working state, use the color blocks in the image U1 as a reference to mark the color blocks of the electrical component to be identified in normal working state after troubleshooting, and determine its working state.

[0068] Step S2-2: Classify the electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and detection difficulty.

[0069] Preferably, in step S2-2, the grading process is specifically as follows: all electrical equipment are divided into 4 levels, among which electrical equipment with high importance and high detection difficulty is Class A, electrical equipment with high importance and low detection difficulty is Class B; electrical equipment with low importance and high detection difficulty is Class C, and electrical equipment with low importance and low detection difficulty is Class D.

[0070] Clarify the equipment classification levels, distinguish the priorities of equipment testing and equipment debugging, facilitate the formulation of testing plans, and improve the rapid and accurate generation of debugging steps by improving the efficiency of testing plan generation.

[0071] Preferably, step S4 includes the following steps:

[0072] Step S4-1: Pre-generate debugging steps based on the classification of electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and difficulty of detection. All electrical equipment is tested in the order of A, B, C, and D. Based on the test results, the equipment is debugged in the order of A, B, C, and D.

[0073] Step S4-2: Input the detection sequence of step S4-1 into the solution risk estimation unit, estimate the debugging steps, and rationally modify the pre-generated debugging steps according to the connection status of the electrical equipment;

[0074] Step S4-3: Output the debugging steps after the rationalization modification is completed and store them in the data storage module of the detection equipment.

[0075] The entire debugging method generation and optimization process is carried out through Figure 2 The debug solution shown in the figure generates a structure implementation, which specifically includes:

[0076] Plan formulation module: used to formulate specific detection plans and equipment debugging plans based on the basic functions of electrical equipment, idle the equipment during the detection process, control the functional status of electrical equipment during the detection and debugging process through the equipment control module, improve the accuracy of working status data detection by limiting the functional status of electrical equipment, and pre-generate debugging steps for the power system through highly accurate equipment status detection results.

[0077] Information acquisition module: collects the working data information of the power system, provides data support for the pre-generation of the power system debugging steps, and sends the obtained data to the data output module and the operation risk assessment module for information interaction.

[0078] Operation risk assessment module: Based on the various data information collected during the equipment operation process obtained by the information acquisition module, combined with the historical data in the database for information comparison, the risk of the pre-generated power system debugging steps is estimated, and the pre-generated debugging steps are optimized according to the data collected by the information acquisition module to form the final debugging steps.

[0079] Data storage module: stores historical information and records the optimized debugging steps in real time to facilitate subsequent detection and functional debugging of the same electrical equipment.

[0080] Data output module: completes data information interaction between the data storage module and the plan formulation module, information collection module, and operation risk assessment module.

[0081] Equipment control module: After the final debugging steps are formed, debug the electrical equipment according to the final debugging steps.

[0082] The above describes in detail the structure, features and effects of the present invention based on the embodiments shown in the drawings, but the above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be noted that the technical features involved in the above embodiments and their preferred modes can be reasonably combined and matched into a variety of equivalent schemes by those skilled in the art without departing from or changing the design ideas and technical effects of the present invention; therefore, the scope of implementation of the present invention is not limited to what is shown in the drawings. Any changes made in accordance with the concept of the present invention, or modifications to equivalent embodiments with equivalent changes, which still do not exceed the spirit covered by the description and drawings, should be within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step S1: Performing a status detection on the power device to be detected using a detection device; the detection content includes the status of the power detection interface switch, specifically: connecting the power device to be detected with an electrical signal and connecting it to the detection device; numbering the power detection interface switch to be detected on each power device to be detected; performing a first round of scanning and identification of the power detection interface switches to be detected, confirming the switch closed status, and marking the switches that are initially closed; forcibly closing the power detection interface switches to be detected that are not closed; performing a second round of scanning and identification on the switches that are forcibly closed; completing the scanning and identification of the switches to be detected, and restoring all the switches to be detected to the status before the first round of scanning and identification; Step S2: partitioning and classifying the internal structure of the power equipment to be tested; Step S3: pre-generating the debugging steps according to the state detection of the power equipment to be detected after zoning and classification; After the pre-generation of the debugging steps is completed, the pre-generated debugging steps are input into the scheme risk assessment unit, the risk assessment of the debugging steps and the pre-generation of debugging results are performed, and the pre-generated debugging steps are rationally modified to form the final debugging steps.

2. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 1, characterized in that: The detection content of step S1 includes the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system.

3. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 2, characterized in that: The process of detecting the working status of the electrical equipment in the power system comprises the following steps: Step S1-2-1: Connect K electrical components to be tested in the power system into a one-way circuit, and set a signal input and a signal output; Step S1-2-2: numbering each electrical component to be tested in the unidirectional circuit in step S1-2-1; Step S1-2-3: Perform linear detection of the electrical component to be detected based on the number, starting from the signal input and ending at the signal output, and input the detection results into the statistical matrix P; Step S1-2-4: After determining the fault location, first collect the working status of the electrical component to be detected in normal operation to form the image to be identified U1, and then collect the current, voltage, electric power, and working heat at the fault location to form the image to be identified U2. By comparing the image to be identified U1 and the image to be identified U2, the fault information of the electrical component to be detected is checked and confirmed.

4. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step S2 comprises the following steps: Step S2-1: Divide the image U1 or U2 of the electrical equipment to be identified in the power system into several areas. Use horizontal and vertical lines to divide the template image into multiple rectangular image blocks to be identified. Label the image blocks 1 to C from left to right and from top to bottom. Correlate the positions of the image blocks in the original image U1 or U2 with the normal working state or faulty working state of the corresponding electrical component. If the electrical component is in normal working state, use the color blocks in the image U1 as a reference to mark the color blocks of the electrical component to be identified in normal working state after troubleshooting, and determine its working state. Step S2-2: Classify the electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and detection difficulty.

5. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 4, characterized in that: In step S2-2, the grading process is as follows: all electrical equipment are divided into 4 levels, among which electrical equipment with high importance and high detection difficulty is Class A, electrical equipment with high importance and low detection difficulty is Class B; electrical equipment with low importance and high detection difficulty is Class C, and electrical equipment with low importance and low detection difficulty is Class D.

6. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 1 or 5, characterized in that: The step S3 comprises the following steps: Step S3-1: Pre-generate debugging steps based on the classification of electrical equipment in the power system according to their importance and difficulty of detection. All electrical equipment is tested in the order of A, B, C, and D. Based on the test results, the equipment is debugged in the order of A, B, C, and D. Step S3-2: Input the detection sequence of step S3-1 into the solution risk estimation unit, estimate the debugging steps, and rationally modify the pre-generated debugging steps according to the connection status of the electrical equipment; Step S3-3: Output the debugging steps after the rationalization modification is completed and store them in the data storage module of the detection equipment.

7. The method for intelligently generating debugging steps based on state detection according to claim 1, characterized in that: The intelligent generation method of debugging steps is implemented through the debugging scheme generation structure, which specifically includes: a scheme formulation module: used to formulate specific detection schemes and equipment debugging schemes through the basic functions of electrical equipment, idle the equipment during the detection process, and control the functional status of electrical equipment during the detection process and debugging process through the equipment control module.

Images