A cognitive impairment testing method, apparatus, device and medium
By screening cognitive assessment forms and conducting cognitive domain tests, the problem of inaccurate test results in existing technologies has been solved, resulting in more accurate risk assessment levels and ensuring the effectiveness of training.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202211605091.2
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2022-12-14
- Publication Date
- 2025-11-04
- Estimated Expiration
- 2042-12-14
AI Technical Summary
Existing cognitive impairment testing methods generate inaccurate test results, leading to unsatisfactory results in subsequent cognitive impairment training.
The test subjects are tested using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, and test scores for each cognitive item are generated. Obstacle cognitive items with test scores lower than the preset normal value are screened out and subjected to cognitive domain testing to obtain cognitive domain scores for the obstacle cognitive items. The risk assessment level is then regenerated to improve accuracy.
This ensures that the risk assessment level generated by the cognitive assessment form is more accurate, better reflects the cognitive impairment status of the test subjects, and provides more effective training programs.
Smart Images
Figure CN115966306B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This specification relates to the field of computer technology, specifically to the field of smart healthcare technology, particularly to the field of cognitive impairment technology, and especially to a cognitive impairment testing method, device, equipment, and medium. Background Technology
[0002] Cognition is the intelligent processing of knowledge acquisition by an organism, involving a series of voluntary, psychological, and social behaviors such as learning, memory, language, thinking, mental state, and emotion. Cognitive impairment refers to abnormalities in the higher-level intelligent processing of the brain related to learning, memory, and judgment, resulting in severe learning and memory disorders, accompanied by pathological changes such as aphasia, apraxia, agnosia, or apraxia.
[0003] In existing technologies, cognitive impairment tests for test subjects mostly use cognitive assessment forms, and the resulting test results may not be accurate, so the subsequent cognitive impairment training effect may not be ideal. Summary of the Invention
[0004] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a cognitive impairment testing method, apparatus, device, and medium to address the technical problems raised in the background art.
[0005] One or more embodiments of this specification employ the following technical solutions:
[0006] This specification provides a cognitive impairment testing method according to one or more embodiments, including:
[0007] Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item.
[0008] The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0009] Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items;
[0010] A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item;
[0011] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0012] Optionally, generating the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item includes:
[0013] Obtain the parameter information of the test subjects related to the cognitive impairment test;
[0014] The parameter risk level of the test subject is generated based on the parameter information.
[0015] The test risk level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item.
[0016] The risk level of the test is verified based on the risk level of the parameters to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject.
[0017] Optionally, generating the parameter risk level of the test subject based on the parameter information includes:
[0018] Obtain the risk level corresponding to each of the pre-set parameter information;
[0019] Based on the risk level corresponding to each parameter information, the parameter risk level of the test subject is generated.
[0020] Optionally, the step of verifying the test risk level based on the parameter risk level to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject includes:
[0021] Compare the risk level of the parameter with the risk level of the test;
[0022] If it is determined that the parameter risk level of the test subject is the same as the test risk level, the test risk level is set as the risk assessment level of the test subject.
[0023] Optionally, if it is determined that the parameter risk level of the test subject is different from the test risk level, the method further includes:
[0024] Determine whether the difference between the parameter risk level and the test risk level is lower than a preset level value;
[0025] If so, the test risk level is set as the risk assessment level of the test subject.
[0026] Optionally, the testing of the subject's cognitive items includes:
[0027] A first preset number of test questions are obtained from each of the cognitive items;
[0028] A first preset number of test questions were conducted for each of the aforementioned cognitive items;
[0029] The cognitive domain test of the cognitive items related to the obstacle includes:
[0030] Obtain a second preset number of test questions from the obstacle recognition section;
[0031] The test is conducted on a second preset number of test questions for the obstacle recognition item;
[0032] The second preset quantity is greater than the first preset quantity.
[0033] Optionally, the cognitive domain test includes: memory-related cognitive domain, attention-related cognitive domain, and visuospatial construction-related cognitive domain.
[0034] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a cognitive impairment testing device, the device comprising:
[0035] The testing and scoring unit uses a pre-set cognitive assessment form to test each cognitive item of the test subject and generate test scores for each cognitive item.
[0036] The risk assessment level unit generates the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0037] The obstacle cognition item unit filters out obstacle cognition items whose test scores are lower than preset normal values from the various cognition items;
[0038] The cognitive domain scoring unit performs a cognitive domain test on the obstacle cognitive item to obtain a cognitive domain score for the obstacle cognitive item.
[0039] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated in the reassessment unit.
[0040] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a cognitive impairment testing device, comprising:
[0041] At least one processor; and,
[0042] A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein,
[0043] The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, which, when executed by the at least one processor, enable the at least one processor to:
[0044] Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item.
[0045] The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0046] Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items;
[0047] A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item;
[0048] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0049] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, wherein the computer-executable instructions are configured as follows:
[0050] Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item.
[0051] The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0052] Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items;
[0053] A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item;
[0054] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0055] The above-described at least one technical solution adopted in the embodiments of this specification can achieve the following beneficial effects:
[0056] In order to ensure that the risk assessment level generated by the cognitive assessment form is more accurate, the embodiments in this specification screen out the obstacle cognitive items from each cognitive item, and conduct cognitive domain tests on the obstacle cognitive items to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognitive items. Then, the risk assessment level is verified by the cognitive domain score, so that the final risk assessment level of the test subject is more accurate. Attached Figure Description
[0057] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments or prior art of this specification, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments recorded in this specification. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort. In the drawings:
[0058] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a cognitive impairment testing method provided in one or more embodiments of this specification;
[0059] Figure 2 A flowchart for a cognitive impairment test provided in one or more embodiments of this specification;
[0060] Figure 3A schematic diagram of the structure of a cognitive impairment testing device provided in one or more embodiments of this specification;
[0061] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a cognitive impairment testing device provided in one or more embodiments of this specification. Detailed Implementation
[0062] This specification provides a method, apparatus, device, and medium for testing cognitive impairment.
[0063] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of this specification, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort should fall within the scope of protection of this specification.
[0064] Figure 1 This diagram illustrates a flowchart of a cognitive impairment testing method provided in one or more embodiments of this specification. This process can be executed by a cognitive impairment testing system. Certain input parameters or intermediate results in the process can be manually adjusted to help improve accuracy.
[0065] The method flow steps of the embodiments in this specification are as follows:
[0066] S102, using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, test the subject's cognitive items and generate test scores for each cognitive item.
[0067] In the embodiments of this specification, the pre-set cognitive assessment scale can be the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The MMSE or MoCA is used to test the test taker's cognitive items, generating test scores for each item. These cognitive items may include working memory, object recognition, managerial memory, digit span, spatial span, episodic memory, visual-graphic memory, delayed recall of object recognition, delayed recall of episodic memory, delayed recall of visual-graphic memory, picture-in-the-box test, and block test, among others. The test score is the score obtained by the test taker from completing the tests for each cognitive item.
[0068] S104, Generate the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item.
[0069] In the embodiments of this specification, after determining the test scores for each cognitive item, the test scores for each cognitive item can be added together to obtain the total cognitive test score. Then, the risk assessment level of the test subject is determined based on the total test score. For example, if the total cognitive test score is 30 points, the total cognitive test score for mild cognitive impairment is 21-30 points, for moderate cognitive impairment it is 11-20 points, and for severe cognitive impairment it is 1-10 points. If the test subject scores 22 points, the risk assessment level of the test subject is mild cognitive impairment. Alternatively, a weight can be assigned to the test scores for each cognitive item. After determining the test scores for each cognitive item, the test scores for each cognitive item can be added together according to their respective weights to obtain the total cognitive test score.
[0070] Furthermore, when determining the risk assessment level in the embodiments of this specification, in addition to the test scores in each cognitive item obtained from the cognitive assessment form, the parameter information related to the cognitive impairment test of the test subject can also be considered. The parameter risk level of the test subject can be determined by the parameter information related to the cognitive impairment test, and the parameter risk level can also reflect the cognitive impairment level of the test subject.
[0071] Based on the aforementioned parameter risk levels, in the process of generating the risk assessment level of the test subject according to the test scores of each cognitive item in this embodiment of the specification, the parameter information related to the cognitive impairment test of the test subject can be obtained first; then, the parameter risk level of the test subject can be generated according to the parameter information. The parameter information may include age, education level, blood sugar and blood pressure values, and historical cognitive test scores. The parameter risk level of the test subject can be obtained by comprehensively considering the parameter information. For example, if the age is 75 years old, the education level is secondary school, and the historical cognitive test score is 9, the parameter risk can be determined to be severe cognitive impairment; then, the test risk level of the test subject is generated according to the test scores of each cognitive item; finally, the test risk level is verified according to the parameter risk level to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject.
[0072] Furthermore, in the embodiments of this specification, during the process of generating the parameter risk level of the test subject based on the parameter information, the risk level corresponding to each parameter information can be obtained in advance. For example, the risk level corresponding to an age of 70 years old is a severe cognitive impairment level, and the risk level corresponding to a historical cognitive test score of 9 is a severe cognitive impairment level. Then, based on the risk level corresponding to each parameter information, the parameter risk level of the test subject is generated. The risk levels corresponding to each parameter information can be summed and averaged. For example, if parameter information a corresponds to a severe cognitive impairment level, parameter information b corresponds to a severe cognitive impairment level, parameter information c corresponds to a mild cognitive impairment level, and parameter information d corresponds to a moderate cognitive impairment level, then mild cognitive impairment level can be set to 1, moderate cognitive impairment level to 1, and severe cognitive impairment level to 3. The cognitive impairment levels of parameter information a, parameter information b, parameter information c, and parameter information d are added together and averaged. The final level value is 2, and the parameter risk level of the test subject can be identified as moderate cognitive impairment.
[0073] It should be noted that both the parameter risk level and the test risk level can reflect the cognitive impairment level of the test subject. However, since the parameter risk level includes the test subject's physical parameters and historical cognitive test scores, it cannot accurately reflect the test subject's cognitive impairment level. The test risk level is the current cognitive impairment level test performed on the test subject, but the test risk level is not necessarily accurate and is affected by many factors during the testing process. Therefore, in the process of verifying the test risk level based on the parameter risk level to obtain the test subject's risk assessment level in the embodiments of this specification, the parameter risk level can be compared with the test risk level. If it is determined that the test risk level and the parameter risk level of the test subject are the same, the test risk level can be... The test risk level is set as the risk assessment level of the test subject. If it is determined that the parameter risk level of the test subject is different from the test risk level, it can be determined whether the difference between the parameter risk level and the test risk level is lower than the preset level value. If so, it can be said that the test risk level test is relatively accurate and reliable, and the test risk level can be set as the risk assessment level of the test subject. If not, it can be said that the test risk level test may not be accurate and reliable, and the test subject needs to be retested. When retesting, the current cognitive assessment form can be continued to be used, or a new cognitive assessment form can be selected to test the test subject, so as to obtain a final risk assessment level that can accurately reflect the level of cognitive impairment of the test subject.
[0074] It should be noted that the preset level value can be set according to the actual situation. When the cognitive impairment test requirements are high, the preset level value can be set lower, and when the cognitive impairment test requirements are low, the preset level value can be set slightly higher. For example, when the cognitive impairment test requirements are high, the preset level value can be set to 0, and when the cognitive impairment test requirements are low, the preset level value can be set to 1.
[0075] S106, filter out obstacle cognitive items whose test scores are lower than the preset normal value from the cognitive items.
[0076] In the embodiments of this specification, the cognitive impairment item refers to the cognitive item obtained from the test subject's cognitive test where there are problems. For example, if the normal score for cognitive item a is 8-10 points, and the test subject scores 5 points when testing cognitive item a, then cognitive item a can be identified as the test subject's cognitive impairment item. The embodiments of this specification screen out the cognitive impairment items and then conduct a more detailed cognitive test on the test subject's cognitive impairment items to determine whether the risk assessment level obtained from the cognitive assessment table is accurate. If it is inaccurate, the test subject can be retested to obtain a more accurate risk assessment level and to better develop corresponding cognitive impairment training for the test subject.
[0077] It should be noted that the preset normal value can be the score of the normal test situation specified in the cognitive assessment table.
[0078] S108, Perform a cognitive domain test on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item.
[0079] In the embodiments of this specification, during the testing of each cognitive item of the test subject, a first preset number of test questions are obtained for each cognitive item; the first preset number of test questions for each cognitive item are tested; during the cognitive domain testing of the obstacle cognitive item, a second preset number of test questions are obtained for the obstacle cognitive item; the second preset number of test questions for the obstacle cognitive item are tested; wherein, the second preset number is greater than the first preset number, for example, the first preset number is 5 and the second preset number is 30. Therefore, in the cognitive domain testing, the embodiments of this specification can conduct a large number of tests on the test subject to make the conclusions drawn by the test subject more accurate for the obstacle cognitive item.
[0080] In the embodiments of this specification, cognitive domain testing may include: memory-related cognitive domain, attention-related cognitive domain, and visuospatial construction-related cognitive domain.
[0081] S110, if the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0082] It should be noted that the embodiments in this specification re-verify the risk assessment level through cognitive domain scoring. Only when the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the cognitive impairment item obtained from the cognitive assessment table is not greater than the preset score value can it be said that the accuracy of the risk assessment level obtained from the cognitive assessment table is more reliable. If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the cognitive impairment item is greater than the preset score value, it means that the risk assessment level obtained from the cognitive assessment table is inaccurate and a retest is required. During the retest, the current cognitive assessment table can be used again, or a new cognitive assessment table can be selected to test the subject, resulting in a final risk assessment level that accurately reflects the subject's cognitive impairment level.
[0083] It should be noted that the preset score can be set according to the actual situation. When the requirements of the cognitive impairment test are high, the preset score can be set lower, and when the requirements of the cognitive impairment test are low, the preset score can be set slightly higher. For example, when the requirements of the cognitive impairment test are high, the preset score can be set to 2, and when the requirements of the cognitive impairment test are low, the preset score can be set to 4.
[0084] In the embodiments described in this specification, it is possible to... Figure 2 The flowchart for the cognitive impairment test shown is as follows:
[0085] 1) The test subject creates a file, fills in basic information, generates a file, and stores it in the database.
[0086] The participant profile primarily collects information on various parameters related to the cognitive impairment test, including: age, height, weight, blood pressure, blood sugar, other illnesses, self-care ability, and historical cognitive test scores. A risk level is generated based on these parameters. This data can be entered by the participant or their family through the system. Each piece of information is categorized; for example, under 50 years old is considered slightly risky, 51-60 years old is slightly risky, 61-70 years old is moderately risky, and over 71 years old is severely risky.
[0087] 2) The test subject takes an overall cognitive test, which corresponds to the above-mentioned "generating the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item". After the test, the corresponding test results are stored in the database (for example, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will give the test subject a score: 0-9 points indicates severe, 10-20 points indicates moderate, 21-26 points indicates mild, and the full score is 30 points).
[0088] The cognitive items in the overall cognitive test for test takers include: memory test (e.g., working memory), visuospatial construction ability test (e.g., block test), attention test (e.g., awareness test), executive function test (e.g., color-word interference test), and reasoning ability test (e.g., spot the difference test).
[0089] 3) Verify the test risk level based on the risk level of the parameter to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject. The specific implementation process is the same as the above.
[0090] 4) The test subject performs a single cognitive domain test.
[0091] Individual cognitive domain tests may include: 1. Memory: Working memory, object recognition, managerial memory, number span, spatial span, episodic memory, visual graphics, delayed recall of object recognition, delayed recall of episodic memory, and delayed recall of visual graphics. 2. Attention: Awareness tests. 3. Visuospatial construction ability: Picture test and block test.
[0092] 5) Generate a cognitive test report.
[0093] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a cognitive impairment testing device provided in one or more embodiments of this specification. The device includes: a testing and scoring unit 302, a risk assessment level unit 304, a cognitive impairment item unit 306, a cognitive domain scoring unit 308, and a reassessment unit 310.
[0094] The test scoring unit 302 tests each cognitive item of the test subject using a pre-set cognitive assessment form and generates test scores for each cognitive item.
[0095] Risk assessment level unit 304 generates the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0096] The obstacle cognition item unit 306 filters out obstacle cognition items whose test scores are lower than preset normal values from the various cognition items;
[0097] The cognitive domain scoring unit 308 performs a cognitive domain test on the obstacle cognitive item to obtain a cognitive domain score for the obstacle cognitive item.
[0098] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the reassessment unit 310 regenerates the risk assessment level of the test subject.
[0099] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a cognitive impairment testing device provided for one or more embodiments of this specification includes:
[0100] At least one processor; and,
[0101] A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein,
[0102] The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, which, when executed by the at least one processor, enable the at least one processor to:
[0103] Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item.
[0104] The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0105] Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items;
[0106] A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item;
[0107] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0108] This specification provides one or more embodiments of a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, wherein the computer-executable instructions are configured as follows:
[0109] Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item.
[0110] The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item;
[0111] Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items;
[0112] A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item;
[0113] If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated.
[0114] The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner. Similar or identical parts between embodiments can be referred to mutually. Each embodiment focuses on describing the differences from other embodiments. In particular, the embodiments of apparatus, devices, and non-volatile computer storage media are basically similar to the method embodiments, so the descriptions are relatively simple; relevant parts can be referred to the descriptions of the method embodiments.
[0115] The foregoing has described specific embodiments of this specification. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps recited in the claims may be performed in a different order than that shown in the embodiments and may still achieve the desired result. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific or sequential order shown to achieve the desired result. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are possible or may be advantageous.
[0116] The above description is merely one or more embodiments of this specification and is not intended to limit this specification. Various modifications and variations can be made to the one or more embodiments of this specification by those skilled in the art. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principle of one or more embodiments of this specification should be included within the scope of the claims of this specification.
Claims
1. A cognitive impairment testing device, characterized in that, The device includes: The testing and scoring unit uses a pre-set cognitive assessment form to test each cognitive item of the test subject and generate test scores for each cognitive item. The risk assessment level unit generates the risk assessment level of the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item; The obstacle cognition item unit filters out obstacle cognition items whose test scores are lower than preset normal values from the various cognition items; The cognitive domain scoring unit performs a cognitive domain test on the obstacle cognitive item to obtain a cognitive domain score for the obstacle cognitive item. If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated in the reassessment unit. The testing of the subjects' cognitive items includes: A first preset number of test questions are obtained from each of the cognitive items; A first preset number of test questions were conducted for each of the aforementioned cognitive items; The cognitive domain test of the cognitive items related to the obstacle includes: Obtain a second preset number of test questions from the obstacle recognition section; The test is conducted on a second preset number of test questions for the obstacle recognition item; Wherein, the second preset quantity is greater than the first preset quantity; The cognitive domain tests include: memory-related cognitive domains, attention-related cognitive domains, and visuospatial construction-related cognitive domains.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterized in that, The process of generating the risk assessment level for the test subject based on the test scores of each cognitive item includes: Obtain the parameter information of the test subjects related to the cognitive impairment test; The parameter risk level of the test subject is generated based on the parameter information. The test risk level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item. The risk level of the test is verified based on the risk level of the parameters to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject.
3. The apparatus according to claim 2, characterized in that, The step of generating the parameter risk level of the test subject based on the parameter information includes: Obtain the risk level corresponding to each of the pre-set parameter information; Based on the risk level corresponding to each parameter information, the parameter risk level of the test subject is generated.
4. The apparatus according to claim 2, characterized in that, The step of verifying the test risk level based on the parameter risk level to obtain the risk assessment level of the test subject includes: Compare the risk level of the parameter with the risk level of the test; If it is determined that the parameter risk level of the test subject is the same as the test risk level, the test risk level is set as the risk assessment level of the test subject.
5. The apparatus according to claim 4, characterized in that, If it is determined that the subject's parameter risk level is different from the test risk level, the following are also included: Determine whether the difference between the parameter risk level and the test risk level is lower than a preset level value; If so, the test risk level is set as the risk assessment level of the test subject.
6. A cognitive impairment testing device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as, A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, which, when executed by the at least one processor, enable the at least one processor to: Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item. The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item; Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items; A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item; If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated; The testing of the subjects' cognitive items includes: A first preset number of test questions are obtained from each of the cognitive items; A first preset number of test questions were conducted for each of the aforementioned cognitive items; The cognitive domain test of the cognitive items related to the obstacle includes: Obtain a second preset number of test questions from the obstacle recognition section; The test is conducted on a second preset number of test questions for the obstacle recognition item; Wherein, the second preset quantity is greater than the first preset quantity; The cognitive domain tests include: memory-related cognitive domains, attention-related cognitive domains, and visuospatial construction-related cognitive domains.
7. A non-volatile computer storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-executable instructions are stored thereon and are configured as follows: Using a pre-set cognitive assessment form, the test subjects are tested on various cognitive items, and test scores are generated for each cognitive item. The risk assessment level of the test subject is generated based on the test scores of each cognitive item; Among the cognitive items, those with test scores lower than preset normal values are selected as obstacle cognitive items; A cognitive domain test is performed on the obstacle cognition item to obtain the cognitive domain score of the obstacle cognition item; If the difference between the cognitive domain score and the test score of the obstacle cognition item is greater than the preset score, the risk assessment level of the test subject is regenerated; The testing of the subjects' cognitive items includes: A first preset number of test questions are obtained from each of the cognitive items; A first preset number of test questions were conducted for each of the aforementioned cognitive items; The cognitive domain test of the cognitive items related to the obstacle includes: Obtain a second preset number of test questions from the obstacle recognition section; The test is conducted on a second preset number of test questions for the obstacle recognition item; Wherein, the second preset quantity is greater than the first preset quantity; The cognitive domain tests include: memory-related cognitive domains, attention-related cognitive domains, and visuospatial construction-related cognitive domains.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Adaptive neurological testing method
CN113784664A