Method, device and storage medium for determining jump of access section state

Abstract

The application discloses a kind of route section state jump determination method, device and storage medium, method includes: determining train through interlocking boundary;Obtain the first occupation state of the current section where train is located and the second occupation state of the next section of current section;According to the first occupation state and the second occupation state, obtain the first jump information;Judge whether the first jump information satisfies the first preset condition, wherein the first preset condition includes: the occupation state of current section, next section is by 10 jump as 00, jump again as 01, and / or, by 10 directly jump as 01, 0 indicates idle, 1 indicates occupation;If it is satisfied, it is judged that current section state jump is normal. Thus, the method can make train drive through interlocking boundary normally, and will not cause misjudgment train abnormal drive through interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay of axle count occupation information and interlocking area information or the speed of train is too fast, so as to facilitate subsequent timely and effectively section unlocking.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of rail transit technology, and in particular to a method, device, and storage medium for determining the jump status of a route section. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, in high-speed railway signaling using Computer Interlocking (CI) technology, trains must travel within locked route sections, and after a train has passed through normally, the locked route section needs to be unlocked to ensure the normal operation of subsequent trains. Therefore, timely and effective unlocking of route sections is essential. Summary of the Invention

[0003] One objective of this invention is to provide a method, device, and storage medium for determining the transition status of a route section, so that the train can pass through the interlocking boundary normally without misjudging the train's abnormal passage through the interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay between axle occupancy information and interlocking zone information or the train's excessive speed.

[0004] In a first aspect, the present invention proposes a method for determining the jump status of a route section, comprising: determining that the train has passed through an interlocking boundary, wherein the interlocking boundary is the boundary between the interlocking area where the current section of the train is located and the interlocking area where the next section of the current section is located; obtaining a first occupancy status of the current section and a second occupancy status of the next section; obtaining first jump information based on the first occupancy status and the second occupancy status; determining whether the first jump information meets a first preset condition, wherein the first preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current section and the next section jumps from 10 to 00, and then jumps to 01, and / or jumps directly from 10 to 01, where 0 represents idle and 1 represents occupied; if the first jump information meets the first preset condition, then the jump status of the current section is determined to be normal.

[0005] Secondly, the present invention proposes a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the above-mentioned method for determining the jump state of a route segment is implemented.

[0006] Thirdly, the present invention proposes a route segment status jump determination device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the above-mentioned route segment status jump determination method.

[0007] The method, device, and storage medium for determining the jump status of the route section in this embodiment of the invention, through the setting of a first preset condition, enable the train to pass through the interlocking boundary normally, and prevent misjudgment of the train abnormally passing through the interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay between axle occupancy information and interlocking area information or the excessive speed of the train. This facilitates timely and effective unlocking of the section and better ensures the normal operation of trains on the line.

[0008] Additional aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. Attached Figure Description

[0009] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the jump status of a route section according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0010] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the jump status of a route section according to another embodiment of the present invention;

[0011] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a train operating section, which is a specific example of the present invention;

[0012] Figure 4 This is a structural block diagram of the route section status jump determination device according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0013] Currently, the unlocking methods for train route sections are as follows:

[0014] a. The current section can be unlocked if the train enters and leaves the current section normally and the previous section is unlocked.

[0015] b. Perform a three-point check on the section within the route. If the current section is occupied and cleared, the previous section has been occupied and cleared, and the next section ahead is occupied, then the current section can be unlocked.

[0016] However, the above unlocking method has the following problems:

[0017] Issue 1: When multiple interlocking zones are not considered, the interaction delay of section occupancy information at the interlocking boundary leads to abnormal jumps in the three-point check status. Each interlocking zone has a large number of network nodes, which can easily increase the time spent on information transmission; there is also a certain communication delay in the interaction of information between the interlocking of this station and the interlocking of neighboring stations, resulting in a lag in the acquisition of axle occupancy information by the fully electronic interlocking acquisition system of the neighboring station's interlocking zone; abnormal jumps in the three-point check status judgment lead to fault locking of the section, affecting the normal passage of trains through that section.

[0018] Issue 2: The issue did not consider the possibility of trains traveling at excessive speeds when passing through interlocking boundary areas, which could cause abnormal switching of the three-point check status at the interlocking boundary. If the simultaneous occupation time of the two sections at the interlocking boundary is less than the time required for interlocking information exchange, meaning that when the axle counting occupancy information is transmitted back to the current interlocking zone and then sent to the adjacent station's interlocking system, there may be instances where the simultaneous occupation of both boundary sections by the train is not detected. This leads to the determination of an abnormal switching of the three-point check status, resulting in a fault lockout and affecting the train's normal passage through that section.

[0019] To address the aforementioned problems, this invention proposes a method, apparatus, and storage medium for determining the transition state of a route segment. The following description, with reference to the accompanying drawings, describes the method, apparatus, and storage medium for determining the transition state of a route segment according to embodiments of the present invention, wherein the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions throughout. The embodiments described with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present invention.

[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the jump status of a route section according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0021] like Figure 1 As shown, the method for determining the jump status of a route segment includes:

[0022] S1, confirms that the train has passed through the interlocking boundary.

[0023] The interlocking boundary is the boundary between the interlocking zone where the train is currently located and the interlocking zone of the next section. In other words, the interlocking boundary is the line between two adjacent interlocking zones.

[0024] Specifically, when a train reaches the interlocking boundary, the three-point check status may malfunction due to delays in information exchange or excessive speed. Therefore, when a train passes the interlocking boundary, the three-point check status can be used to determine the malfunction, preventing fault locking in the current section and allowing the train to pass through normally. This can be achieved using axle counting sensors installed along the trackside at the interlocking boundary, or by using positioning equipment on the train.

[0025] S2, obtain the first occupancy status of the current segment and the second occupancy status of the next segment.

[0026] S3, obtain the first jump information based on the first occupancy status and the second occupancy status.

[0027] S4, determine whether the first jump information meets the first preset condition.

[0028] As an example, the first preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment changes from 10 to 00, and then to 01, where 0 indicates that the segment is free and 1 indicates that the segment is occupied.

[0029] As another example, the first preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps directly from 10 to 01.

[0030] As another example, the first preset conditions include: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 00, then to 01, and directly from 10 to 01.

[0031] S5. If the first jump information meets the first preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

[0032] Specifically, the first preset condition is a special jump condition. When a train passes through an interlocking boundary, if the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 00, and then to 01; or if the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 01, it can be determined that the train has normally left the current segment and normally entered the adjacent next segment. At this time, it can be determined that the status jump of the current segment is normal, and the subsequent unlocking judgment of the current segment can be performed. Thus, the timely unlocking of the current segment can be guaranteed, facilitating the normal operation of subsequent trains.

[0033] In one embodiment of the present invention, the method for determining the jump status of a route segment may further include: determining whether the first jump information meets the second preset condition, wherein the second preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 11, and then jumps to 01; if the first jump information meets the second preset condition, it is determined that the jump status of the current segment is normal.

[0034] Specifically, the second preset condition is a normal transition condition. When a train passes through an interlocking boundary, unlocking can be determined not only by the first preset condition but also by this second preset condition. If the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment transitions from 10 to 11 and then to 01, it can be determined that the train has normally left the current segment and entered the adjacent next segment. At this point, the status transition of the current segment can be considered normal, and subsequent unlocking determinations for the current segment can be performed. This ensures the timely unlocking of the current segment, facilitating the normal operation of subsequent trains.

[0035] It should be noted that when a train passes the boundary between two adjacent sections within an interlocking zone, the jump status is determined only using the second preset condition.

[0036] As a possible implementation, if the first jump information does not meet the first preset condition and the second preset condition, the current segment is determined to be fault-locked.

[0037] Specifically, when a train passes through an interlocking boundary, if the occupancy status of the current section and the next section does not change from 10 to 00 and then to 01, nor from 10 to 01 and then to 11 and then to 01, it can be determined that the status transition of the current section is abnormal, leading to fault locking, or that there is an abnormality in the trackside equipment near the interlocking boundary. In this case, subsequent unlocking judgments for the current section can be stopped, and a warning message can be issued, such as through a centralized station or through the mobile terminal of maintenance personnel, so that maintenance personnel can handle the situation promptly.

[0038] In one embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 2 As shown, if the current segment is not the first segment of the route, the method for determining the jump status of the route segment may also include:

[0039] S6, obtain the third occupancy status of the previous segment of the current segment.

[0040] As a feasible implementation method, before executing steps S2 and S6, it can be determined whether the current segment is the first segment of the route. If it is, only step S2 is executed; if not, both S2 and S6 can be executed simultaneously.

[0041] S7, obtain the second jump information based on the third occupancy state, the first occupancy state, and the second occupancy state.

[0042] S8, determine whether the second jump information meets the third preset condition.

[0043] As an example, the third preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment changes from 010 to 000, and then to 001, where 0 indicates idle and 1 indicates occupied.

[0044] As another example, the third preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment jumps directly from 010 to 001.

[0045] As another example, the third preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment jumps from 010 to 000, then to 001, and directly from 010 to 001.

[0046] S8. If the second jump information meets the third preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

[0047] Specifically, the third preset condition is a special jump condition. When a train passes through an interlocking boundary, if the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment jumps from 010 to 000, and then to 001; or if the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 010 to 001, it can be determined that the train has normally left the current segment and normally entered the adjacent next segment. At this time, it can be determined that the status jump of the current segment is normal, and the subsequent unlocking judgment of the current segment can continue. Thus, the timely unlocking of the current segment can be guaranteed, facilitating the normal operation of subsequent trains.

[0048] In one embodiment of the present invention, the method for determining the jump status of a route segment may further include: determining whether the second jump information meets a fourth preset condition, wherein the fourth preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment jumps from 010 to 011, and then jumps to 001; if the second jump information meets the fourth preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

[0049] Specifically, the fourth preset condition is a normal transition condition. When the train passes through the interlocking boundary and the current segment is not the first segment of the route, unlocking can be determined not only by the third preset condition mentioned above but also by this fourth preset condition. If the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment transitions from 010 to 011 and then to 001, it can be determined that the train has normally left the current segment and normally entered the adjacent next segment. At this time, it can be determined that the status transition of the current segment is normal, and the subsequent unlocking determination of the current segment can continue. Thus, the timely unlocking of the current segment can be guaranteed, facilitating the normal operation of subsequent trains.

[0050] It should be noted that when a train passes the boundary between two adjacent sections within an interlocking zone, and the current section is not the first section of the route, the jump status is determined only using the fourth preset condition.

[0051] In one possible implementation, if the current segment is not the first segment of the route, and the second jump information does not meet the third and fourth preset conditions, then the current segment remains in a locked state.

[0052] Specifically, when a train passes through an interlocking boundary, if the occupancy status of the previous section, the current section, and the next section does not change from 010 to 000 and then to 001, nor from 010 to 001 and then to 011 and then to 001, then it can be determined that the current section's status transition is abnormal, leading to a fault lockout of the current section, or an abnormality in the trackside equipment near the interlocking boundary. In this case, subsequent unlocking judgments for the current section can be stopped, and a warning message can be issued, such as through a centralized station or through the mobile terminal of maintenance personnel, so that maintenance personnel can handle the situation promptly.

[0053] To facilitate understanding, the following will be combined with Figure 3 The method for determining the jump status of the route section according to an embodiment of the present invention is described below:

[0054] like Figure 3 As shown, there are interlocking zones CI1 and CI2. When a train passes through the interlocking boundary, that is, the train travels from section PT2 of interlocking zone CI1 to section PT3 of interlocking zone CI2.

[0055] In a specific example, if the segment for the three-point check state transition (i.e., the current segment) is the first segment within the route, then the three-point check queries the overall transition status of the current segment and the next segment. If the transition status is from 10 to 00, 10 to 01, and 00 to 01, then it is considered a normal transition.

[0056] Specifically, see Figure 3 When section PT2 is the first section within the route, section PT2 only checks two points: this section and the next section. The train travels from interlocking zone CI1 to interlocking zone CI2, with the train's operating sections sequentially as follows: PT1->PT2->PT3->PT4. When the train passes through interlocking zone CI1, the three-point check status of section PT2 changes to: 10->00->01, as detailed below:

[0057] S101, after the train enters physical section PT2, it only occupies section PT2 at this time, and the three-point check status of section PT2 in this cycle is 10;

[0058] S102, the train travels at a relatively high speed towards PT3 section of the CI2 interlocking area. At this point, the train has already left section PT2 and entered the CI2 interlocking area, and section PT2 is now cleared and vacant. However, due to the delay in collecting axle occupancy information from the adjacent station's CI2 interlocking area and the periodic delay in transmitting information to the CI1 interlocking area, the CI1 interlocking area has not received occupancy information from PT3 of the CI2 interlocking area in this cycle, and therefore considers PT3 to still be vacant. At this time, the three-point check status of section PT2 is 00. That is, the three-point check status of section PT2 jumps from 10 to 00, and since the interlocking area where this section is located and the interlocking area where the next section is located are two adjacent interlocking areas, section PT2 is considered to be non-fault-locked.

[0059] S103, then the interlocking zone CI1 receives the occupancy information of section PT3 in interlocking zone CI2, and the three-point check status of section PT2 jumps from 00 to 01.

[0060] The entire process determines that the PT2 section is not fault-locked. Therefore, when the train clears out of the last section of this interlocking zone, even if the occupancy status of the next adjacent section cannot be collected, it is considered that the train has normally left this interlocking zone and entered the next interlocking zone, so this section can be unlocked normally and in a timely manner.

[0061] In another specific example, the three-point check checks the transition segment (i.e., the current segment) within the route, which is not the first segment of the route. The three-point check queries the overall transition status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment. If the transition status is from 010 to 000, 010 to 001, and 000 to 001, then it is considered a normal transition.

[0062] Specifically, see Figure 3 When section PT2 is not the first section within the route, section PT2 undergoes a three-point check. The train travels from interlocking zone CI1 to interlocking zone CI2, with the train's operating sections sequentially as follows: PT1->PT2->PT3->PT4. When the train passes through interlocking zone CI1, the three-point check status of section PT2 changes to: 010->000->001, as detailed below:

[0063] S201, after the train enters physical section PT2, it only occupies section PT2 at this time. The three-point check status of section PT2 in this cycle is 010.

[0064] S202, the train is traveling at a relatively high speed towards PT3 section of the CI2 interlocking area. At this point, the train has already left PT2 and entered the CI2 interlocking area, and PT2 is now cleared and vacant. However, due to the delay in collecting axle occupancy information from the adjacent station's CI2 interlocking area and the periodic delay in transmitting information to the CI1 interlocking area, the CI1 interlocking area has not received occupancy information for PT3 in the CI2 interlocking area during this period, and therefore considers PT3 to still be vacant. At this time, the three-point check status of PT2 section is 000. That is, the three-point check status of PT2 section jumps from 010 to 000, and since the interlocking area where this section is located and the interlocking area where the next section is located are two adjacent interlocking areas, PT2 section is considered to be non-fault-locked.

[0065] S203, then the interlocking zone CI1 receives the occupancy information of section PT3 in interlocking zone CI2, and the three-point check status of section PT2 jumps from 000 to 001.

[0066] The entire process determines that the PT2 section is not fault-locked. Therefore, when the train clears out of the last section of this interlocking zone, even if the occupancy status of the next adjacent section cannot be collected, it is considered that the train has normally left this interlocking zone and entered the next interlocking zone, so this section can be unlocked normally and in a timely manner.

[0067] Additionally, see Figure 3If the current segment is the first segment of the route and the occupancy status jumps directly from 10 to 01, or if the current segment is not the first segment of the route and the occupancy status jumps directly from 010 to 001, and the interlocking area where this segment is located and the interlocking area where the next segment is located are two adjacent interlocking areas, then the three-point check is considered to have a normal jump, the current segment status jump can be determined to be normal, and the subsequent unlocking judgment of the current segment can be performed.

[0068] In summary, the route section status jump determination method of this invention, based on the characteristics of increasingly large train operation lines (with multiple centralized stations) and the joint operation of multiple interlocking zones, sets a first preset condition and a second preset condition, so that the train can pass through the interlocking boundary normally. It will not be misjudged as the train abnormally passing through the interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay of axle occupancy information and interlocking zone information or the excessive speed of the train. This facilitates timely and effective unlocking of the section and better ensures the normal operation of trains on the line.

[0069] The present invention also proposes a computer-readable storage medium.

[0070] In an embodiment of the present invention, a computer program is stored on a computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed by a processor, it implements the above-described method for determining the jump state of a route segment.

[0071] When the computer-readable storage medium of this invention stores a computer program corresponding to the above-mentioned method for determining the jump status of a route section, and the program is executed by a processor, the train can pass through the interlocking boundary normally. This prevents misjudgment of the train abnormally passing through the interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay between axle occupancy information and interlocking zone information or the excessive speed of the train. This facilitates timely and effective unlocking of the section and better ensures the normal operation of trains on the line.

[0072] The present invention also proposes a jump determination device for the state of a route section.

[0073] In embodiments of the present invention, such as Figure 4 As shown, the route segment status jump determination device 100 includes a memory 11, a processor 12, and a computer program stored in the memory 11. When the computer program is executed by the processor 12, it implements the above-mentioned route segment status jump determination method.

[0074] The route section status jump determination device of this invention, when the computer program corresponding to the above-mentioned route section status jump determination method stored in its memory is executed by the processor, enables the train to pass through the interlocking boundary normally. It will not cause misjudgment of the train abnormally passing through the interlocking boundary due to the interaction delay of axle occupancy information and interlocking area information or the excessive speed of the train, thereby facilitating timely and effective unlocking of the section and better ensuring the normal operation of trains on the line.

[0075] It should be noted that the logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein can be considered as a ordered list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be specifically implemented in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-included system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: an electrical connection having one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk drive (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Alternatively, the computer-readable medium may be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, since the program can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

[0076] It should be understood that various parts of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. If implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0077] In the description of this specification, references to terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., indicate that a specific feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0078] In the description of this specification, the terms "center", "longitudinal", "lateral", "length", "width", "thickness", "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", "clockwise", "counterclockwise", "axial", "radial", "circumferential", etc., indicate the orientation or positional relationship based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings. They do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and should not be construed as limiting the present invention.

[0079] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of this invention, "a plurality of" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified.

[0080] In this specification, unless otherwise stated, the terms "installation," "connection," "joining," and "fixing," etc., should be interpreted broadly. For example, they can refer to a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral part; they can refer to a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; they can refer to a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium; they can refer to the internal communication of two components or the interaction between two components, unless otherwise explicitly defined. Those skilled in the art can understand the specific meaning of the above terms in this invention according to the specific circumstances.

[0081] In this invention, unless otherwise explicitly specified and limited, "above" or "below" the second feature can mean that the first feature is in direct contact with the second feature, or that the first feature is in indirect contact with the second feature through an intermediate medium. Furthermore, "above," "over," and "on top" of the second feature can mean that the first feature is directly above or diagonally above the second feature, or simply that the first feature is at a higher horizontal level than the second feature. "Below," "below," and "under" the second feature can mean that the first feature is directly below or diagonally below the second feature, or simply that the first feature is at a lower horizontal level than the second feature.

[0082] Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present invention. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for determining the jump status of a route section, characterized in that, include: Determine that the train has passed through the interlocking boundary, wherein the interlocking boundary is the boundary between the interlocking area where the current section of the train is located and the interlocking area where the next section of the current section is located; Obtain the first occupancy status of the current segment and the second occupancy status of the next segment; The first jump information is obtained based on the first occupancy status and the second occupancy status; Determine whether the first jump information meets the first preset condition, wherein the first preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 00, and then jumps to 01, and jumps directly from 10 to 01, where 0 indicates idle and 1 indicates occupied; If the first jump information meets the first preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

2. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine whether the first jump information meets the second preset condition, wherein the second preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the current segment and the next segment jumps from 10 to 11, and then jumps to 01; If the first jump information meets the second preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

3. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The method further includes: If the first jump information does not meet the first preset condition and the second preset condition, then the current segment is determined to be fault-locked.

4. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Obtain the third occupancy status of the previous segment of the current segment; The second jump information is obtained based on the third occupancy status, the first occupancy status, and the second occupancy status. Determine whether the second jump information meets the third preset condition; If the second jump information meets the third preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

5. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 4, characterized in that, The third preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment changes from 010 to 000, and then to 001.

6. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 4, characterized in that, The third preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment directly jumps from 010 to 001.

7. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 6, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine whether the second jump information meets the fourth preset condition, wherein the fourth preset condition includes: the occupancy status of the previous segment, the current segment, and the next segment jumps from 010 to 011, and then jumps to 001; If the second jump information meets the fourth preset condition, then the current segment status jump is determined to be normal.

8. The method for determining the jump status of a route section as described in claim 7, characterized in that, The method further includes: If the second jump information does not meet the third and fourth preset conditions, then the current segment is determined to be fault-locked.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the method for determining the jump status of the route segment as described in any one of claims 1-8.

10. A device for determining the jump status of a route section, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory, characterized in that, When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements the method for determining the jump status of the route segment as described in any one of claims 1-8.

Images