Error-proofing method for installing and calling machine tool

Through digital processing and comparison of tool parameter information, the tool installation and call error problems caused by manual operation errors in CNC machining are solved, and the quality and production efficiency of machining parts are achieved.

CN116276307BActive Publication Date: 2025-04-11ZHEJIANG UNIV +1
View PDF 2 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202310320532.2
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Patents(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2023-03-24
Publication Date
2025-04-11
Estimated Expiration
2043-03-24

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

During the CNC machining process, tool installation and call errors caused by manual operation errors, resulting in quality problems of machining parts, tool damage and frequent production accidents.

Method used

By digitizing, identifying, storing and comparing tool parameter information, a machine tool tool error-proof system is used to identify tool numbers, read relevant information, and compare theoretical parameters with tool group measurement parameters to ensure correct installation of the tool, and check whether the remaining tool life and measurement parameters are within the allowable range before processing.

Benefits of technology

It effectively avoids tool installation and call errors caused by manual operation errors, improves the quality of machining parts, reduces production accidents and economic losses, and improves the utilization rate and processing efficiency of machine tools.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN116276307B_ABST
    Figure CN116276307B_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention discloses a method for preventing errors in installing and calling machine tool tools. The method comprises the following steps: identifying the tool number of the installed tool, reading relevant information of the tool parameters, and calling the stored tool theoretical parameters and tool assembly measurement parameters for comparison. On the one hand, the method confirms that the installed tool is the correct tool, and on the other hand, the tool assembly measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of tool processing compared with the tool theoretical parameters. Before actual processing, the tool remaining life is compared to confirm that the tool remaining life meets the theoretical time consumption of the machine tool processing program. The machine tool tool setting instrument is operated to measure the tool to obtain the tool measurement parameters. By comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool theoretical parameters and the tool assembly measurement parameters respectively, it is confirmed that the tool measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of the processing tool, thereby effectively preventing product failures and tool damage caused by incorrect use of the tool and incorrect tool parameters.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of numerical control machining, and specifically relates to a method for preventing errors in installing and calling a machine tool. Background Art

[0002] As an important production tool for mechanical processing in the manufacturing industry, in recent years, the application scope of CNC machine tools has been continuously expanded, and the processing efficiency and processing accuracy have been continuously improved. Compared with traditional non-CNC machine tools, CNC machine tools can effectively improve product production efficiency and reduce the difficulty of manual operation in dealing with multi-variety small batch parts, high-precision requirements, highly complex structures and frequently modified workpieces. Therefore, CNC machine tool processing is one of the mainstream development directions in the field of mechanical processing in the future.

[0003] In the process of applying CNC machining technology, how to reasonably and effectively utilize the high automation and high efficiency technical characteristics of CNC machine tools, give full play to their ability to process complex parts and realize flexible production, carry out targeted research on auxiliary preparatory work in the CNC machining process, and achieve high utilization of CNC machine tools and high quality of processed parts through standardized operations and software program assistance, while reducing the scrap rate, lowering the frequency of machine tool failures, and preventing the occurrence of safety accidents is of great significance.

[0004] Generally speaking, a complete CNC machine tool processing process mainly goes through three stages, namely, preparation before processing, CNC program execution, and cleaning after processing. Among them, the preparation stage before processing mainly includes the following contents:

[0005] (1) The technician writes the parts processing process documents and CNC processing programs according to the on-site operation instructions;

[0006] (2) The machine tool operator prepares the raw materials and tools for the workpiece according to the process documents;

[0007] (3) Installation of tools, tooling and processing materials: installing tools to the designated tool positions of CNC machine tools, clamping materials to tooling, and installing tooling to the processing table;

[0008] (4) The tool parameters for machining are entered into the CNC system, the tool is loaded onto the machine tool spindle, and the machining program is loaded onto the machine tool through the machine tool human-machine interactive operation interface;

[0009] (5) Inspection of the tool installed on the spindle that is about to execute the machining program.

[0010] As can be seen from the above, there are many preparations before CNC machining and the workload is large. From the preparation of process information to the preparation of machining materials to the installation and testing of tools and tooling, almost all links require manual intervention. Some parameter settings, including the input of tool parameters and the setting of spindle speed multipliers, require manual participation. Due to human errors (such as tool preparation errors, tool loading errors, tool parameter input errors), there are endless problems with the quality and scrapping of machined parts, and damage and scrapping of tools, which have gradually become the main factors affecting the optimization of machined part quality and the improvement of production efficiency. Summary of the invention

[0011] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method, which can effectively avoid errors in the tool installation and tool call process caused by human operating errors, thereby avoiding damage to production parts and reducing production accidents and economic losses in the CNC machining process.

[0012] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:

[0013] A method for preventing errors in installing and calling a machine tool tool comprises the following steps:

[0014] Step 1: Select a processing tool, measure the tool length to obtain the tool length tool set value, measure the tool diameter to obtain the tool diameter tool set value, and measure the bottom angle radius to obtain the bottom angle radius tool set value; and upload the tool set measurement parameters including the tool length tool set value, tool diameter tool set value and bottom angle radius tool set value to the tool error prevention system;

[0015] Step 2: After the tool is installed, identify the number of the tool installed on the machine tool, and compare the identified tool number with the number of the tool to be installed stored in the tool error prevention system; if the comparison is correct, the tool has been correctly installed in the corresponding tool position of the machine tool, and the machine tool continues to run, while obtaining the tool theoretical parameters and remaining tool life stored in the tool error prevention system; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0016] Step 3: Compare the tool theoretical parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters; if the comparison result shows that the deviation range of the tool assembly measurement parameters compared with the tool theoretical parameters is within the set tool parameter deviation range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0017] Step 4: Compare the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program; if the life of the currently installed tool is greater than or equal to the theoretical time consumption of the machining program, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0018] Step 5: Use the machine tool tool setting instrument to measure the tool to obtain tool measurement parameters including tool length measurement value, tool diameter measurement value and bottom angle radius measurement value, call the theoretical parameters and tool assembly measurement parameters of the tool with the corresponding number stored in the tool error prevention system, and compare the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters and the tool theoretical parameters respectively; if the deviation range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool theoretical parameters is within the set range, and the error range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool assembly measurement parameters is within the set range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and prompts the tool wear tolerance information on the machine tool human-machine interaction section.

[0019] Furthermore, in step 3, the method for comparing the theoretical parameters of the tool with the measured parameters of the tool assembly is:

[0020] D 0L =|T L -C L |

[0021] D 0D =|T D -C D |

[0022] D 0R =|T R -C R |

[0023] Among them, D 0L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between

[0024] If D is satisfied 0L ≤D eL , D 0D ≤D eD And D 0R ≤D eR , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0025] Among them, D eL Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The maximum deviation allowed between eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameterD The maximum deviation allowed between eR Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between .

[0026] Furthermore, in step 4, the method for comparing the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program is:

[0027] L o =L K -L A

[0028] Among them, L o Indicates the remaining tool life L K Theoretical time consumption of machining program L A The difference between o >0, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms.

[0029] Furthermore, in step 5, the method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool theoretical parameters is:

[0030] D 1L =|T L -M L |

[0031] D 1D =|T D -M D |

[0032] D 1R =|T R -M R |

[0033] Among them, D 1L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The deviation between 1D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool diameter combination value M D The deviation between 1R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value M R The deviation between

[0034] If D is satisfied 1L ≤D′ eL , D 1D ≤D′ eD And D 1R ≤D′ eR , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0035] Among them, D′ eL Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The maximum deviation allowed between eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D With tool diameter measurement value M D The maximum deviation allowed between eR Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R and submit the radius measurement value M R The maximum deviation allowed between .

[0036] Furthermore, in step 5, the method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters is as follows:

[0037] E 0L =|C L -M L |

[0038] E 0D =|C D -M D |

[0039] E 0R =|C R -M R |

[0040] Among them, E 0L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between 0D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value M D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between

[0041] If E is satisfied 0L ≤E L 、E 0D ≤E D And E 0R ≤E R , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0042] Among them, E L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The maximum allowable deviation between D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value MD Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The maximum allowable deviation between R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between

[0043] The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

[0044] The machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method of the present invention is based on the digital processing, identification, storage and comparison of tool parameter information. It realizes tool error prevention during the machine tool tool installation and debugging process by obtaining the tool assembly parameter information (including tool length, tool diameter, bottom angle radius, and tool remaining life) of the tool currently used for processing by the machine tool and the data comparison algorithm. Specifically, by identifying the tool number of the installed tool, reading the relevant information of the tool parameters, and calling the stored tool theoretical parameters and tool assembly measurement parameters for comparison, on the one hand, it is confirmed that the installed tool is the correct tool, and on the other hand, it is confirmed that the tool assembly measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of the tool processing compared to the tool theoretical parameters; after the above operations are completed, before the actual processing, through the tool remaining life comparison, it is confirmed that the tool remaining life meets the theoretical time consumption of the machine tool processing program, and then the machine tool tool setting instrument is run to measure the tool to obtain the tool measurement parameters, and by comparing the tool theoretical value with the tool measurement parameters, it is confirmed that the tool is correct. Confirm that the tool measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of the processing tool, and confirm that the tool measurement parameters are within the allowable error range of the processing tool by comparing the tool group measurement parameters with the tool measurement parameters; during the actual execution of tool installation and calling, if the data comparison result does not meet the theoretical requirements of the tool parameters for executing the machine tool processing program, the system will prompt relevant deviation information on the human-machine operation interaction interface, automatically alarm and record the corresponding alarm results, update the operation log, and immediately terminate the machine tool program operation, effectively preventing product failures and tool damage caused by incorrect use of tools and incorrect tool parameters. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0045] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and beneficial effects of the present invention clearer, the present invention provides the following drawings for illustration:

[0046] Figure 1 The present invention is a flowchart of an embodiment of the error-proofing method for installing and calling a machine tool. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0047] The present invention is further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments so that those skilled in the art can better understand the present invention and implement it, but the embodiments are not intended to limit the present invention.

[0048] like Figure 1The figure is a flow chart of an embodiment of the method for preventing errors in installing and calling machine tool tools of the present invention. The method for preventing errors in installing and calling machine tool tools of the present embodiment comprises the following steps:

[0049] Step 1: Select the processing tool, measure the tool length to obtain the tool length group value, measure the tool diameter to obtain the tool diameter group value, measure the bottom angle radius to obtain the bottom angle radius group value; and upload the tool group measurement parameters including the tool length group value, tool diameter group value and bottom angle radius group value to the tool error prevention system.

[0050] Step 2: After the tool is installed, identify the number of the tool installed on the machine tool, and compare the identified tool number with the number of the tool to be installed stored in the tool error prevention system; if the comparison is correct, the tool has been correctly installed in the corresponding tool position of the machine tool, and the machine tool continues to run, while obtaining the tool theoretical parameters and remaining tool life stored in the tool error prevention system; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms.

[0051] Step 3: Compare the theoretical parameters of the tool with the measured parameters of the tool assembly; if the comparison result shows that the deviation range of the measured parameters of the tool assembly compared to the theoretical parameters of the tool is within the set tool parameter deviation range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and an alarm is issued.

[0052] Specifically, in this embodiment, the method for comparing the tool theoretical parameters with the tool set measurement parameters is:

[0053] D 0L =|T L -C L |

[0054] D 0D =|T D -C D |

[0055] D 0R =|T R -C R |

[0056] Among them, D 0L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between

[0057] If D is satisfied 0L ≤DeL , D 0D ≤D eD And D 0R ≤D eR , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0058] Among them, D eL Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The maximum deviation allowed between eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The maximum deviation allowed between eR Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between .

[0059] Step 4: Compare the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program; if the life of the currently installed tool is greater than or equal to the theoretical time consumption of the machining program, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and an alarm is issued.

[0060] Specifically, in this embodiment, the method for comparing the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program is:

[0061] L0=L K -L A

[0062] Among them, L0 represents the remaining tool life L x Theoretical time consumption of machining program L A If L0>0, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms.

[0063] Step 5: Use the machine tool tool setting instrument to measure the tool to obtain tool measurement parameters including tool length measurement value, tool diameter measurement value and bottom angle radius measurement value, call the theoretical parameters and tool assembly measurement parameters of the tool with the corresponding number stored in the tool error prevention system, and compare the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters and the tool theoretical parameters respectively; if the deviation range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool theoretical parameters is within the set range, and the error range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool assembly measurement parameters is within the set range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and prompts the tool wear tolerance information on the machine tool human-machine interaction section.

[0064] Specifically, in this embodiment, the method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool theoretical parameters is:

[0065] D 1L =|T L -ML |

[0066] D 1D =|T D -M D |

[0067] D 1R =|T R -M R |

[0068] Among them, D 1L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The deviation between 1D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool diameter combination value M D The deviation between 1R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value M R The deviation between

[0069] If D is satisfied 1L ≤D′ eL , D 1D ≤D′ eD And D 1R ≤D′ eR , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0070] Among them, D′ eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The maximum deviation allowed between eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D With tool diameter measurement value M D The maximum deviation allowed between eR Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R and submit the radius measurement value M R The maximum deviation allowed between .

[0071] The method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters is as follows:

[0072] E 0L =|C L -M L |

[0073] E 0D =|C D -M D |

[0074] E 0R =|CR -M R |

[0075] Among them, E 0L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between 0D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value M D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between

[0076] If E is satisfied 0L ≤E L , A 0D ≤E D And E 0R ≤E R , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms;

[0077] Among them, E L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The maximum allowable deviation between D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value M D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The maximum allowable deviation between R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between

[0078] In this embodiment:

[0079] D eL =D′ eD =E L

[0080] D eD =D′ eD =E D

[0081] D eR =D′ eR =E R

[0082] The specific implementation method of the machine tool tool installation and calling error prevention method of this embodiment is described below with reference to specific examples.

[0083] Now we need to use a plane milling cutter to implement the plane milling (750min) processing steps on the workpiece. After the technician compiles the part processing process file and CNC processing program according to the on-site operation instructions, the machine tool operator prepares the workpiece raw materials and tools according to the process file. Here, we assume that the tool theoretical parameters of the selected plane milling cutter are: tool diameter 200mm, tool radius 30mm, bottom angle radius 3mm; at the same time, select the remaining tool life of 800min, and obtain the tool number. The tool theoretical parameters and tool remaining life can be obtained by identifying the tool number.

[0084] The tool length, tool diameter and bottom angle radius of the tool are measured after the tool is assembled outside the production line to obtain tool assembly measurement parameters including tool length assembly value, tool diameter assembly value and bottom angle radius assembly value, and the tool assembly measurement parameters are uploaded to the tool error prevention system. The tool assembly measurement parameters obtained in this embodiment are: tool length assembly value 200.51mm, tool diameter assembly value 30.32mm, bottom angle radius assembly value 3.00mm.

[0085] Identify the tool installed on the machine tool, compare the tool number obtained by identification with the tool number to be installed stored in the tool error prevention system. If the number comparison is correct, it means that the installed tool is the correct tool. The machine tool continues to run, and compares the tool group measurement parameters of the identified tool with the tool theoretical parameters. Here:

[0086] D 0L =|200-200.41|=0.41mm<D eL =0.55mm

[0087] D 0D =|30-30.32|=0.32mm<D eD =0.45mm

[0088] D 0R =|3-3.00|=0mm<D eR =0.1mm

[0089] The comparison results are all within the allowable deviation range of the tool and the machine tool continues to run.

[0090] Before processing, the machine tool compares the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time required to execute the machine tool processing program. Here:

[0091] L0=|800-750|=50min>0

[0092] If L0 is greater than 0, execute the tool selection command, call the current tool to the machine tool spindle, and prepare to execute the processing task.

[0093] On the premise that the installed tool has been confirmed to be the correct tool, the tool set measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of tool processing, and the remaining life of the tool meets the theoretical time consumption of the machine tool processing program, the tool parameters are actually measured. In this embodiment, the machine tool uses an in-machine tool setting instrument to measure the tool to obtain the tool measurement parameters: tool diameter 199.88mm, tool radius 29.87mm, bottom angle radius 3.06mm, and tool measurement parameters are obtained, and the tool measurement parameters are compared with the tool theoretical parameters. Here:

[0094] D 1L =|200-199.88|=0.12mm<D eL =0.55mm

[0095] D 1D =|30-29.88|=0.12mm<D eD =0.45mm

[0096] D 0R =|3-3.06|=0.06mm<D eR =0.1mm

[0097] The comparison results are all within the allowable deviation range of the tool and the machine tool continues to run.

[0098] On the premise that the installed tool has been confirmed to be the correct tool, the tool set measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of tool processing, and the tool remaining life meets the theoretical time consumption of the machine tool processing program, and the tool measurement parameters are within the allowable deviation range of tool processing, the tool measurement parameters are compared with the tool set measurement parameters. Here:

[0099] E 0L =|200.41-199.88|=0.53mm<E L =0.55mm

[0100] E 0D =|30.32-29.88|=0.44mm<E D =0.45mm

[0101] E 0R =|3.00-3.06|=0.06mm<E R =0.1mm

[0102] The comparison results are all within the allowable error range of the tool, so the machine tool continues to run and starts processing.

[0103] The above-described embodiments are only preferred embodiments for fully illustrating the present invention, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Equivalent substitutions or changes made by those skilled in the art based on the present invention are within the protection scope of the present invention. The protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the claims.

Claims

1. A method for preventing errors in installing and calling machine tool tools, characterized in that: The steps include: Step 1: Select a processing tool, measure the tool length to obtain the tool length tool set value, measure the tool diameter to obtain the tool diameter tool set value, and measure the bottom angle radius to obtain the bottom angle radius tool set value; and upload the tool set measurement parameters including the tool length tool set value, tool diameter tool set value and bottom angle radius tool set value to the tool error prevention system; Step 2: After the tool is installed, identify the number of the tool installed on the machine tool, and compare the identified tool number with the number of the tool to be installed stored in the tool error prevention system; if the comparison is correct, the tool has been correctly installed in the corresponding tool position of the machine tool, and the machine tool continues to run, while obtaining the tool theoretical parameters and remaining tool life stored in the tool error prevention system; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Step 3: Compare the tool theoretical parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters; if the comparison result shows that the deviation range of the tool assembly measurement parameters compared with the tool theoretical parameters is within the set tool parameter deviation range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Step 4: Compare the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program; if the life of the currently installed tool is greater than or equal to the theoretical time consumption of the machining program, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Step 5: Use the machine tool tool setting instrument to measure the tool to obtain tool measurement parameters including tool length measurement value, tool diameter measurement value and bottom angle radius measurement value, and compare the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters and tool theoretical parameters respectively; if the deviation range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool theoretical parameters is within the set range, and the error range of the tool measurement parameters compared with the tool assembly measurement parameters is within the set range, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and prompts the tool wear tolerance information on the machine tool human-machine interaction section.

2. The machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 3, the method for comparing the theoretical parameters of the tool with the measured parameters of the tool assembly is: D 0L =|T L -C L | D 0D =|T D -C D | D 0R =|T R -C R | Among them, D 0L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between 0D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between If D is satisfied 0L ≤D eL , D 0D ≤D eD And D 0R ≤D eR , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Among them, D eL Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L Tool length combination value C L The maximum deviation allowed between eD Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The maximum deviation allowed between eR Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between .

3. The machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 4, the method for comparing the remaining life of the tool with the theoretical time consumption of the machining program is: L O =L K -L A Among them, L O Indicates the remaining tool life L K Theoretical time consumption of machining program L A The difference between O >O, the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms.

4. The machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 5, the method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool theoretical parameters is: D 1L =|T L -M L | D 1D =|T D -M D | D 1R =|T R -M R | Among them, D 1L Indicates the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The deviation between 1D Indicates the theoretical value of tool diameter T D Tool diameter combination value M D The deviation between 1R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R And the delivery radius tool value M R The deviation between If D is satisfied 1L ≤D eL ′、D 1D ≤D eD ′ and D 1R ≤D eR ', the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Among them, D eL ′ represents the theoretical value of tool length T L With tool length measurement value M L The maximum deviation allowed between eD ' represents the theoretical value of tool diameter T D With tool diameter measurement value M D The maximum deviation allowed between eR ' represents the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius T R and submit the radius measurement value M R The maximum deviation allowed between .

5. The machine tool tool installation and call error prevention method according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step 5, the method for comparing the tool measurement parameters with the tool assembly measurement parameters is as follows: E 0L =|C L -M L | E 0D =|C D -M D | E 0R =|C R -M R | Among them, E 0L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The deviation between 0D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value M D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The deviation between 0R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The deviation between If E is satisfied 0L ≤E L 、E 0D ≤E D And E 0R ≤E R , the machine tool continues to run; otherwise, the machine tool stops running and alarms; Among them, E L Indicates the tool length measurement value M L Tool length combination value C L The maximum allowable deviation between D Indicates the tool diameter measurement value M D Tool value C combined with tool diameter D The maximum allowable deviation between R Indicates the theoretical value of the bottom corner radius M R And the delivery radius tool value C R The maximum deviation allowed between

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Novel machine tool cutter compensation system and method

    CN102476322A

  • Cutter control device and control method

    CN111538286A