Performance assessment scoring method and device, equipment and medium
By obtaining and calculating the performance appraisal scoring model, the problem that traditional program writing cannot adapt to changes in the business scoring model is solved, and the flexible adjustment of the scoring model and the satisfaction of different business needs is achieved, improving the user experience.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411013296.0
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-07-26
- Publication Date
- 2024-12-27
AI Technical Summary
Traditional single program writing cannot adapt to the flexible changes in the business assessment and scoring model, resulting in the need to modify the program logic code when business development needs to adjust the scoring model, and cannot meet the needs of different business solutions.
By obtaining the task data and indicator data of the assessment object, determining and obtaining the performance appraisal scoring model, calculating scores based on the model and data, and supporting flexible configuration and adjustment of the scoring model, avoiding modifying the program logic code.
It has realized the flexibly adjusting the scoring model according to business needs, reducing user operations, improving user experience, and meeting the needs of different business solutions.
Smart Images
Figure CN119204773A_ABST
Abstract
Description
[Technical field]
[0001] The present application relates to the field of data processing technology, and in particular to a performance appraisal scoring method, device, equipment and medium. [Background technology]
[0002] In performance appraisal, the business department's business appraisal plan needs to write hard code to complete the changes in business logic in the appraisal plan. As the business develops, the flexibility of the scoring model should also adapt to changes. Traditional single program writing can no longer meet the needs of frequently changing business appraisal scoring models.
[0003] At present, the business plan develops the business models in each plan independently by establishing independent programs. The data model is fixed, the program logic adaptability is single, and a single program cannot support other business logic models. It has the following problems: when the original business plan model needs to be adjusted, increased or modified, the program logic code needs to be modified. For example, in a certain assessment cycle, the annual average daily task value of corporate loans is set to 1 million, and the actual completion value at the end of the assessment period is 1.1 million. The original scoring model is adjusted from adding 1 point to adding 1.5 points when the annual average daily completion rate of corporate loans exceeds 10%. The program needs to be adjusted to respond to the change; because with the needs of business development, the scoring model needs to be continuously adjusted to meet business goals. [Summary of the invention]
[0004] The embodiments of the present application provide a performance appraisal scoring method, device, equipment and medium, which are intended to solve the technical problem in related technologies that requires continuous adjustment of scoring model requirements according to business development.
[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a performance evaluation scoring method, including:
[0006] Obtain the task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object;
[0007] Determine and obtain the performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object;
[0008] The performance appraisal score of the appraisal object is calculated according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
[0009] In one embodiment, optionally, the task data includes task issuance data and actual completion data, and the indicator data includes an indicator name and an indicator code.
[0010] In one embodiment, optionally, obtaining task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object includes:
[0011] Obtain the task list and indicator details list corresponding to the assessment object through batch processing;
[0012] The task table and the indicator detail table are parsed and aggregated to obtain the task data and the indicator data.
[0013] In one embodiment, optionally, determining and obtaining a performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object includes:
[0014] Find the performance appraisal scoring model number corresponding to the appraisal object from the task data and indicator data;
[0015] The corresponding performance appraisal scoring model is obtained from the model database according to the performance appraisal scoring model number.
[0016] In one embodiment, optionally, calculating the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data includes:
[0017] Extracting target data required by the performance appraisal scoring model from the task data and indicator data;
[0018] The performance appraisal score of the appraisal object is calculated according to the target data and the performance appraisal scoring model.
[0019] In one embodiment, optionally, the method further comprises:
[0020] Receive performance appraisal scoring model setting instructions;
[0021] According to the setting instruction, the performance appraisal scoring model is set.
[0022] In one embodiment, optionally, the method further comprises:
[0023] Assigning a performance appraisal scoring model number to the performance appraisal scoring model;
[0024] The performance appraisal scoring model and its number are stored in a model database.
[0025] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a performance evaluation scoring device, including:
[0026] The first acquisition module is used to acquire task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object;
[0027] The second acquisition module is used to determine and acquire the performance evaluation scoring model corresponding to the evaluation object;
[0028] The calculation module is used to calculate the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
[0029] In one embodiment, optionally, the task data includes task issuance data and actual completion data, and the indicator data includes an indicator name and an indicator code.
[0030] In one embodiment, optionally, the first acquisition module includes:
[0031] The first acquisition unit is used to acquire the task list and indicator detail list corresponding to the assessment object through batch processing;
[0032] The aggregation unit is used to parse the task table and the indicator detail table, and aggregate and summarize them to obtain the task data and the indicator data.
[0033] In one embodiment, optionally, the second acquisition module includes:
[0034] A search unit, used to search the performance appraisal scoring model number corresponding to the appraisal object from the task data and indicator data;
[0035] The second acquisition unit is used to acquire the corresponding performance appraisal scoring model from the model database according to the performance appraisal scoring model number.
[0036] In one embodiment, optionally, the calculation module includes:
[0037] An extraction unit, used to extract target data required by the performance evaluation scoring model from the task data and indicator data;
[0038] A calculation unit is used to calculate the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the target data and the performance appraisal scoring model.
[0039] In one embodiment, optionally, the device further comprises:
[0040] A receiving module, used for receiving a performance appraisal scoring model setting instruction;
[0041] A setting module is used to set the performance appraisal scoring model according to the setting instruction.
[0042] In one embodiment, optionally, the device further comprises:
[0043] An allocation module, used to allocate a performance appraisal scoring model number to the performance appraisal scoring model;
[0044] The storage module is used to store the performance appraisal scoring model and its number in the model database.
[0045] In a third aspect, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the steps of the above-mentioned performance appraisal scoring method when executing the computer program.
[0046] In a fourth aspect, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-mentioned performance appraisal scoring method are implemented.
[0047] In the scheme implemented by the above performance appraisal scoring method, device, equipment and medium, the task data and indicator data corresponding to the appraisal object can be obtained; the performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object can be determined and obtained; and the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object can be calculated according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data. In the present invention, the performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object can be determined according to the task data and indicator data of the appraisal object, and then the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object can be calculated according to the performance appraisal scoring model. In this way, by establishing a performance appraisal scoring model, the different needs of different business solutions can be met, and the performance appraisal scoring model can be flexibly configured and adjusted without modifying the program logic code, reducing user operations and improving the user experience.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0048] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.
[0049] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a performance evaluation scoring method according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0050] Figure 2 A schematic flow chart of a performance evaluation scoring method according to another embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0051] Figure 3 A block diagram of a performance evaluation and scoring device according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0052] Figure 4 A block diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application is shown. [Specific implementation method]
[0053] In order to better understand the technical solution of the present application, the embodiments of the present application are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0054] It should be clear that the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present application.
[0055] The terms used in the embodiments of the present application are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments, and are not intended to limit the present application. The singular forms "a", "said" and "the" used in the embodiments of the present application and the appended claims are also intended to include plural forms, unless the context clearly indicates other meanings.
[0056] In conjunction with the accompanying drawings, some embodiments of the present application are described in detail below. In the absence of conflict, the following embodiments and features in the embodiments can be combined with each other.
[0057] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a performance evaluation scoring method according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0058] like Figure 1 As shown, the process of the performance evaluation scoring method according to an embodiment of the present application includes:
[0059] Step S101, obtaining task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object.
[0060] In one embodiment, optionally, the task data includes task issuance data and actual completion data, and the indicator data includes an indicator name and an indicator code.
[0061] In this embodiment, the task data can be the task value, and the actual completion data can be the actual completion value. The indicator data can be the indicator name and indicator code, etc., and of course, it can also be various set values corresponding to the indicator data. For example, for the completion rate scoring application scenario, it can be the basic score corresponding to the business, the completion rate threshold, the completion threshold part score and the excess part cap value score.
[0062] Step S102, determining and obtaining a performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object;
[0063] In one embodiment, optionally, step S102 includes:
[0064] Find the performance appraisal scoring model number corresponding to the appraisal object from the task data and indicator data;
[0065] The corresponding performance appraisal scoring model is obtained from the model database according to the performance appraisal scoring model number.
[0066] The task data and indicator data may include the corresponding performance appraisal scoring model. Specifically, the detailed information of the performance appraisal scoring model may be included, such as the basic score corresponding to the performance appraisal scoring model, the appraisal threshold, the appraisal threshold increase point, the appraisal threshold maximum score, the model creation date and the effective date, etc.
[0067] Step S103, calculating the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
[0068] like Figure 2 As shown, in one embodiment, optionally, step S103 includes:
[0069] Step S201, extracting target data required by the performance appraisal scoring model from the task data and indicator data;
[0070] Step S202: Calculate the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the target data and the performance appraisal scoring model.
[0071] In this embodiment, the target data required by the performance appraisal scoring model can be extracted from the task data and the indicator data, such as the actual completion value and the assigned task value, as well as the basic score, the appraisal threshold, the appraisal threshold increase point, and the appraisal threshold maximum score corresponding to the performance appraisal scoring model. Then, according to the performance appraisal scoring model formula and the above data, the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object is calculated.
[0072] In one embodiment, optionally, step S101 includes:
[0073] Obtain the task list and indicator details list corresponding to the assessment object through batch processing;
[0074] The task table and the indicator detail table are parsed and aggregated to obtain the task data and the indicator data.
[0075] In this embodiment, the task table and indicator detail table corresponding to the assessment objects can be obtained in batches, and then the task table and indicator detail table can be parsed and aggregated to obtain the desired task data and indicator data.
[0076] As shown in Tables 1 to 6, we can obtain the task table, indicator detail table, task assignment detail table, task detail table, performance appraisal scoring model data table and performance appraisal scoring model table, etc. By analyzing the above tables, we can aggregate and summarize that the task value assigned to the appraisal object Zhang San is 10 million, and the actual completion is 14.5 million, with a basic score of 5 points. If the completion rate exceeds 10%, 1 point will be awarded, and the maximum score is 3 points, that is, R1 = 10 million, S1 = 14.5 million, B1 = 5 points, F1 = 10%, C1 = 1 point, and V1 = 3 points. The corresponding performance appraisal scoring model is:
[0077] Case when R1 / S1>1then case when((R1 / S1-1) / F1)*C1>V1then B1+V1else((R1 / S1-1) / F1)*C1+B1end
[0078] Else B1
[0079] End
[0080] Specifically, for example, for the corporate loan business table, as shown in Table 7, the actual number of personnel and institutions on the specified data date is aggregated and summarized according to the annual average field in the corporate loan table to generate indicator data, as shown in Table 8.
[0081] Table 1
[0082]
[0083]
[0084] Table 2
[0085]
[0086] Table 3
[0087]
[0088]
[0089] Table 4
[0090]
[0091] Table 5
[0092]
[0093]
[0094] Table 6
[0095]
[0096] Table 7
[0097] Table name Field Name Remark Corporate Loan Business Table Data date 2099-06-30 Corporate Loan Business Table IOU Number L10001999001 Corporate Loan Business Table Product Number 1201011 Corporate Loan Business Table Subject Number 13010109 Corporate Loan Business Table Business generating institution 0001 Corporate Loan Business Table Account Manager Code 010100 Corporate Loan Business Table Balance at time 20000000 Corporate Loan Business Table Annual daily average 11000000
[0098] Table 8
[0099] Index No. Indicator name Object Index value type KPI00001 Annual average daily corporate loans 010100 11000000 personnel KPI00001 Annual average daily corporate loans 0001 11000000 mechanism
[0100] Traversing the calculation formula corresponding to the performance appraisal scoring model:
[0101]
[0102] The corresponding data in the scoring model is obtained to calculate the final data, and the final score corresponding to the scene is calculated. Zhang San's final score is 8 points.
[0103] Among them, the specific scoring process is: According to the known data: Zhang San was assigned a task value of 10 million, and actually completed 14.5 million, with a basic score of 5 points. If the completion rate exceeds 10%, 1 point will be awarded, and a maximum of 3 points will be awarded. The completion rate is calculated to determine whether the completion rate is greater than 1. When it is less than or equal to 1, the basic score is awarded. When it is greater than 1, the proportion of exceeding the basic score is calculated. According to the proportion of exceeding the basic score, the excess score is calculated, and the final score is calculated based on the basic score and the excess score.
[0104] In one embodiment, optionally, the method further comprises:
[0105] Receive performance appraisal scoring model setting instructions;
[0106] According to the setting instruction, the performance appraisal scoring model is set.
[0107] In this embodiment, the user can flexibly set the performance appraisal scoring model through the page according to business needs, and can also edit the performance appraisal scoring model, such as adding, deleting and modifying, so as to meet the different needs of different business solutions.
[0108] In one embodiment, optionally, the method further comprises:
[0109] Assigning a performance appraisal scoring model number to the performance appraisal scoring model;
[0110] The performance appraisal scoring model and its number are stored in a model database.
[0111] In this embodiment, a corresponding number may be assigned to the added performance appraisal scoring model and stored in the model database, so that the corresponding model can be found according to the model number.
[0112] Figure 3A block diagram of a performance evaluation and scoring device according to another embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0113] like Figure 3 As shown, in the second aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides a performance evaluation scoring device 30, comprising:
[0114] The first acquisition module 31 is used to acquire task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object;
[0115] The second acquisition module 32 is used to determine and acquire the performance evaluation scoring model corresponding to the evaluation object;
[0116] The calculation module 33 is used to calculate the performance evaluation score of the evaluation object according to the performance evaluation scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
[0117] In one embodiment, optionally, the task data includes task issuance data and actual completion data, and the indicator data includes an indicator name and an indicator code.
[0118] In one embodiment, optionally, the first acquisition module includes:
[0119] The first acquisition unit is used to acquire the task list and indicator detail list corresponding to the assessment object through batch processing;
[0120] The aggregation unit is used to parse the task table and the indicator detail table, and aggregate and summarize them to obtain the task data and the indicator data.
[0121] In one embodiment, optionally, the second acquisition module includes:
[0122] A search unit, used to search the performance appraisal scoring model number corresponding to the appraisal object from the task data and indicator data;
[0123] The second acquisition unit is used to acquire the corresponding performance appraisal scoring model from the model database according to the performance appraisal scoring model number.
[0124] In one embodiment, optionally, the calculation module includes:
[0125] An extraction unit, used to extract target data required by the performance evaluation scoring model from the task data and indicator data;
[0126] A calculation unit is used to calculate the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the target data and the performance appraisal scoring model.
[0127] In one embodiment, optionally, the device further comprises:
[0128] A receiving module, used for receiving a performance appraisal scoring model setting instruction;
[0129] A setting module is used to set the performance appraisal scoring model according to the setting instruction.
[0130] In one embodiment, optionally, the device further comprises:
[0131] An allocation module, used to allocate a performance appraisal scoring model number to the performance appraisal scoring model;
[0132] The storage module is used to store the performance appraisal scoring model and its number in the model database.
[0133] In a third aspect, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the steps of the above-mentioned performance appraisal scoring method when executing the computer program.
[0134] In a fourth aspect, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-mentioned performance appraisal scoring method are implemented.
[0135] It should be noted that those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the above-described device and each module can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.
[0136] It should be noted that those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the above-described device and each module can refer to the corresponding process in the aforementioned method embodiment, and will not be repeated here.
[0137] The above-mentioned device can be implemented in the form of a computer program. Figure 4 Runs on the computer device shown.
[0138] Figure 4 A block diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application is shown.
[0139] See also Figure 4 The computer device includes a processor, a memory and a network interface connected through a system bus, wherein the memory may include a storage medium and an internal memory.
[0140] The storage medium can store an operating system and a computer program. The computer program includes program instructions, and when the program instructions are executed, the processor can execute any of the infectious disease spatial prediction methods for multi-source data provided in the embodiments of the present application.
[0141] The processor is used to provide computing and control capabilities and support the operation of the entire computer equipment.
[0142] The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the computer program in the storage medium. When the computer program is executed by the processor, the processor can execute any method. The storage medium can be non-volatile or volatile.
[0143] The network interface is used for network communication, such as sending assigned tasks, etc. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that Figure 4 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
[0144] It should be understood that the processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), and the processor may also be other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. Among them, the general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may also be any conventional processor, etc.
[0145] In addition, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, wherein the computer-executable instructions are used to execute the steps of implementing the above-mentioned performance appraisal scoring method.
[0146] It should be noted that the above functions or steps that can be implemented by the computer-readable storage medium or electronic device can refer to the relevant description in the aforementioned method embodiment. To avoid repetition, they will not be described one by one here.
[0147] The above, in combination with the accompanying drawings, describes in detail the technical solution of the present application. Through the technical solution of the present application, by establishing a performance appraisal scoring model, the different needs of different business solutions can be met, and the performance appraisal scoring model can be flexibly configured and adjusted without modifying the program logic code, reducing user operations and improving the user experience.
[0148] It should be understood that the term "and / or" used in this article is only a description of the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, the character " / " in this article generally indicates that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship.
[0149] It should be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used to describe the setting unit in the embodiments of the present application, these setting units should not be limited to these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish the setting units from each other. For example, without departing from the scope of the embodiments of the present application, the first setting unit may also be referred to as the second setting unit, and similarly, the second setting unit may also be referred to as the first setting unit.
[0150] The word "if" as used herein may be interpreted as "at the time of" or "when" or "in response to determining" or "in response to detecting", depending on the context. Similarly, the phrases "if it is determined" or "if (stated condition or event) is detected" may be interpreted as "when it is determined" or "in response to determining" or "when detecting (stated condition or event)" or "in response to detecting (stated condition or event)", depending on the context.
[0151] In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.
[0152] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of hardware plus software functional units.
[0153] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application can include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).
[0154] The embodiments described above are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit the same. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features may be replaced by equivalents. Such modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, and should all be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A performance appraisal scoring method, characterized in that: include: Obtain the task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object; Determine and obtain the performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object; The performance appraisal score of the appraisal object is calculated according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
2. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The task data includes assigned task data and actual completion data, and the indicator data includes an indicator name and an indicator code.
3. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Obtain the task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object, including: Obtain the task list and indicator details list corresponding to the assessment object through batch processing; The task table and the indicator detail table are parsed and aggregated to obtain the task data and the indicator data.
4. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Determine and obtain the performance appraisal scoring model corresponding to the appraisal object, including: Find the performance appraisal scoring model number corresponding to the appraisal object from the task data and indicator data; The corresponding performance appraisal scoring model is obtained from the model database according to the performance appraisal scoring model number.
5. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Calculating the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data includes: Extracting target data required by the performance appraisal scoring model from the task data and indicator data; The performance appraisal score of the appraisal object is calculated according to the target data and the performance appraisal scoring model.
6. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The method further comprises: Receive performance appraisal scoring model setting instructions; According to the setting instruction, the performance appraisal scoring model is set.
7. The performance evaluation scoring method according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The method further comprises: Assigning a performance appraisal scoring model number to the performance appraisal scoring model; The performance appraisal scoring model and its number are stored in a model database.
8. A performance evaluation scoring device, characterized in that: include: The first acquisition module is used to obtain task data and indicator data corresponding to the assessment object; The second acquisition module is used to determine and acquire the performance evaluation scoring model corresponding to the evaluation object; The calculation module is used to calculate the performance appraisal score of the appraisal object according to the performance appraisal scoring model and the task data and indicator data.
9. A computer device, characterized in that: include: at least one processor; and, a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, wherein the instructions are configured to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: Computer executable instructions are stored, and the computer executable instructions are used to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.