Security attainment evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a security attainment evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring an evaluation score of each secondary evaluation index of a to-be-tested object in a target safety attainment system; wherein the target safety attainment system comprises at least one first-level evaluation index and at least one second-level evaluation index associated with the first-level evaluation index; according to the first-level index weight corresponding to the at least one first-level evaluation index, the second-level index weight corresponding to the at least one second-level evaluation index and the evaluation score, determining a safety attainment score corresponding to the to-be-tested object; and determining a processing mode corresponding to the to-be-tested object according to the safety nutrient value. According to the technical scheme, the effect of carrying out personalized and targeted evaluation on the safety attainment of the to-be-tested object according to the target safety attainment system is realized, so that the accuracy of safety attainment evaluation of the to-be-tested object is improved, and the human factor accident rate is reduced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of power grid technology, and in particular to a safety literacy assessment method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] The safety literacy evaluation index system for power grid personnel is a comprehensive standard for evaluating and measuring the safety knowledge, skills and behaviors of power grid personnel. The system is established to ensure the safe operation of the power system, reduce accident risks, protect the lives of personnel, and maintain the integrity of power facilities.

[0003] In related technologies, the safety literacy assessment of power grid personnel usually starts from the organizational level, such as power grid safety culture training, publicity and assessment, etc. Such an assessment method may be incomplete and lack individual targeting, which in turn leads to low accuracy of personnel safety literacy assessment results and failure to timely discover safety hazards caused by low safety literacy of personnel. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present invention provides a safety literacy assessment method, device, electronic device and storage medium to achieve the effect of personalized and targeted assessment of the safety literacy of the object to be tested based on the target safety literacy system, thereby improving the accuracy of the safety literacy assessment of the object to be tested and reducing the rate of human-caused accidents.

[0005] According to one aspect of the present invention, a safety literacy assessment method is provided, the method comprising:

[0006] Obtaining the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator, and the secondary evaluation indicator is subordinate to the primary evaluation indicator;

[0007] Determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators, and the evaluation score;

[0008] A processing method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined according to the safety literacy score.

[0009] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a safety literacy assessment device, the device comprising:

[0010] An evaluation score acquisition module, used to obtain the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator, and the secondary evaluation indicator is subordinate to the primary evaluation indicator;

[0011] A safety literacy score determination module, used to determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators, and the evaluation score;

[0012] The object processing method determination module is used to determine the processing method corresponding to the object to be tested according to the safety literacy score.

[0013] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device, the electronic device comprising:

[0014] at least one processor; and

[0015] a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein,

[0016] The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor so that the at least one processor can execute the safety literacy assessment method described in any embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] According to another aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions are used to enable a processor to implement the safety literacy assessment method described in any embodiment of the present invention when executed.

[0018] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention obtains the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be measured in the target safety literacy system; wherein, the target safety literacy system includes at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, and further, according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator and the evaluation score, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, and then, according to the safety literacy score, the processing method corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, which solves the problem that the evaluation method in the related technology is incomplete and lacks individual targeting, and then, leads to a low accuracy rate of the personnel safety literacy assessment results, and achieves the effect of personalized and targeted evaluation of the safety literacy of the object to be measured based on the target safety literacy system, thereby improving the accuracy of the safety literacy assessment of the object to be measured and reducing the human accident rate.

[0019] It should be understood that the contents described in this section are not intended to identify the key or important features of the embodiments of the present invention, nor are they intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Other features of the present invention will become easily understood through the following description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0021] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a safety literacy assessment method provided according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention;

[0022] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a safety literacy assessment method provided according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention;

[0023] Figure 3 is a structural schematic diagram of a safety literacy assessment device provided according to Embodiment 3 of the present invention;

[0024] Figure 4 It is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device for implementing the safety literacy assessment method of an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0025] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the scheme of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0026] It should be noted that the terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification and claims of the present invention and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish similar objects, and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that the data used in this way can be interchanged where appropriate, so that the embodiments of the present invention described herein can be implemented in an order other than those illustrated or described herein. In addition, the terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions, for example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not necessarily limited to those steps or units that are clearly listed, but may include other steps or units that are not clearly listed or inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.

[0027] Embodiment 1

[0028] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a safety literacy assessment method provided in the first embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment is applicable to the case where the safety literacy of the object to be measured is assessed. The method can be executed by a safety literacy assessment device. The safety literacy assessment device can be implemented in the form of hardware and / or software. The safety literacy assessment device can be configured in a terminal and / or a server. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0029] S110. Obtaining the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator.

[0030] Among them, the object to be tested can be understood as the object to be evaluated for safety literacy. In this embodiment, the object to be tested can be an electric power operator. The target safety literacy system can be a pre-established comprehensive standard for evaluating and measuring the safety knowledge, skills and behaviors of the object to be tested. It can be understood that the establishment of the target safety literacy system is to ensure the safe operation of the power system, reduce the risk of accidents, protect the lives of personnel, and maintain the integrity of power facilities. The target safety literacy system is an organic whole composed of a series of interrelated essential attribute indicators. The safety literacy assessment of power operators can objectively and scientifically evaluate the safety operation level of personnel, and can timely discover the safety hazards caused by personnel before the operation, reduce safety accidents caused by personnel errors, and greatly reduce the occurrence of human-related accidents. The target safety literacy system can include at least one evaluation indicator, and the included evaluation indicator is a specific sign of the overall goal of the measurement system. Optionally, the target safety literacy is a multi-level evaluation framework, including at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator.

[0031] Among them, the first-level evaluation indicators can be understood as the overall evaluation criteria for a certain goal. The first-level evaluation indicators can be used to characterize the core elements and overall performance of the goal. They are highly general and comprehensive, and can directly reflect the overall goal achievement of the object to be tested on this goal. Optionally, the first-level evaluation indicators may include the safety core layer, the safety culture layer, and the safety and health layer. The safety core layer can be the core part of the target safety literacy system, which involves the evaluation of power grid safety knowledge and operational behaviors. The safety culture layer is an important part of the target safety literacy system, which involves common values, beliefs, and behavioral norms for power grid safety. The safety and health layer can be understood as the evaluation criteria for evaluating the safety and health of the object to be tested.

[0032] Among them, the secondary evaluation indicators can be a subdivision and concretization of the primary evaluation indicators, and can describe in more detail the specific elements or dimensions covered by the primary evaluation indicators. The secondary evaluation indicators can be more specific and targeted, and can reveal and explain the situation of the primary evaluation indicators in more depth. The secondary evaluation indicators are subordinate to the primary evaluation indicators.

[0033] Optionally, at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the safety core layer includes safety knowledge, safety skills, safety awareness and risk management. Among them, safety knowledge is the foundation, including basic understanding of the power system, operating procedures, safety regulations and standards, etc., specifically including the principles and operating rules, operating procedures and maintenance methods of various systems in the power industry, as well as power grid safety regulations, industry standards and technical specifications, safety operating procedures and emergency response measures. It can be understood that without a solid foundation of safety knowledge, power operators cannot correctly understand and judge the potential risks in their work. Mastering safety knowledge also helps power operators understand the safety management of the power system. Safety skills refer to the ability to apply safety knowledge to actual operations, including but not limited to equipment operation, fault diagnosis, emergency response, etc. For example, correctly executing electrical operation procedures, using professional tools and skills for equipment detection and troubleshooting, quickly launching emergency plans and taking effective measures in emergency situations, and continuously learning and adapting to new technologies and new equipment. Safety awareness refers to the level of awareness of the importance of safety by power workers, as well as their attitude and habits to proactively prevent accidents in their daily work, including sensitivity to potential safety risks, awareness of complying with safety regulations and systems, and proactive reporting of safety hazards and unsafe behaviors. Strengthening safety awareness helps to form good working habits, such as regular inspection of equipment status and risk assessment before operation, which can greatly reduce the probability of accidents. Risk management involves the ability to identify, evaluate and control various risks in power grid operations. In the field of power grids, risk management means analyzing and foreseeing the risks that may arise from various operations and formulating corresponding preventive measures. Effective risk management can not only prevent accidents, but also mitigate their impact when they occur. Risk management includes identifying potential risks in the workplace and during operations; implementing effective risk control measures, such as the use of personal protective equipment and safe isolation; risk assessment and reporting, as well as the ability to adapt to changes in risks; being familiar with emergency plans and procedures; and the speed of response and handling capabilities in emergency situations.

[0034] Optionally, at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the safety culture layer includes safety education and safety culture. Among them, safety education includes safety training, safety publicity, and continuous learning of safety knowledge. The role of safety education in the target safety literacy system is to cultivate and maintain a safety atmosphere in which all employees participate and are responsible. Through continuous education and practical activities, safety concepts are internalized into the behavioral habits of power workers, thereby reducing the risk of accidents and ensuring the safe and stable operation of the power grid. Safety culture includes safety education concepts, safety behavior norms, and safety beliefs, and plays an important basic role in building and maintaining the corporate culture of the power grid.

[0035] Optionally, at least one secondary assessment indicator associated with the safety and health layer includes physical health and mental health. Among them, physical health mainly focuses on the impact of physical health status on safety work, including basic information of the object, physical condition, adaptability to the work environment, etc. For example, whether the physical conditions required for this position are met, and whether there are health problems that may affect work safety (such as visual impairment, hearing impairment, etc.). Mental health mainly involves the performance of power workers in terms of psychological quality, mental health and job satisfaction. For example, the psychological tolerance for emergencies and complex problems, whether one can remain calm and make correct judgments and responses when facing safety hazards; regularly check the mental health of power workers; regularly investigate the job satisfaction of power workers, and whether the working environment needs to be optimized.

[0036] In this embodiment, the target safety literacy system can be used to evaluate the safety literacy of the object to be tested. For each secondary evaluation indicator in the target safety literacy system, the object to be tested can be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria included in the secondary evaluation indicator, and the evaluation score of the object to be tested in the secondary evaluation indicator can be obtained.

[0037] For example, assuming that the secondary evaluation index is the safety knowledge associated with the safety core layer, the subject to be tested can be evaluated through a questionnaire survey in terms of relevant knowledge such as grid safety production laws and regulations, power industry safety production standards and specifications, safety production management knowledge, safety operating procedures and emergency response measures. Furthermore, the obtained score can be used as the evaluation score of the subject to be tested in the safety knowledge evaluation index.

[0038] S120. Determine a safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured according to a first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, a second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator, and an evaluation score.

[0039] Among them, the first-level indicator weight can be the importance of the first-level evaluation indicator relative to the target safety literacy system. It should be noted that the sum of the first-level indicator weights corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator can be a first preset value. Optionally, the preset value can be 1. For example, assume that the first-level indicator weight corresponding to the safety core layer is 0.6479; the first-level indicator weight corresponding to the safety culture layer is 0.1222; the first-level indicator weight corresponding to the safety and health layer is 0.2299; and further, the sum of 0.6479, 0.1222 and 0.2299 is 1. The second-level evaluation indicator can be the importance of the second-level evaluation indicator relative to the target safety literacy system. It should be noted that the sum of the second-level evaluation indicators corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator is a second preset value. Optionally, the second preset value is 1. For example, when the first-level evaluation indicator is the security core layer, the weight of the second-level indicator of security knowledge associated with it is 0.3751; the weight of the second-level indicator of security skills associated with it is 0.3672; the weight of the second-level indicator of security awareness associated with it is 0.1175; and the second-level evaluation indicator of risk management associated with it is 0.1402. Furthermore, the sum of 0.3751, 0.3672, 0.1175 and 0.1402 is 1. The safety literacy score can be the comprehensive score of the object to be tested under the target safety literacy system.

[0040] In this embodiment, for the target safety literacy system, the first-level indicator weights corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator in the target literacy system and the second-level indicator weights corresponding to each second-level evaluation indicator associated with each first-level evaluation indicator can be predetermined. Further, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested can be determined based on the first-level indicator weights corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator and the second-level indicator weights and evaluation scores corresponding to each second-level evaluation indicator.

[0041] Optionally, a safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined based on a first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, a second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator, and an evaluation score, including: for at least one first-level evaluation indicator, a first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator is determined based on a second-level indicator weight and an evaluation score corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator; and a safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined based on a first-level indicator weight and a first-level evaluation score corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator.

[0042] Among them, the first-level evaluation score can be the comprehensive score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicators of the object to be tested.

[0043] In this embodiment, for at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight and evaluation score corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator can be converted into a first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator through a weighted sum operation. Furthermore, the first-level indicator weight and first-level evaluation score corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator can be converted into a safety literacy score corresponding to the test through a weighted sum operation.

[0044] Optionally, a first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator is determined based on the second-level indicator weight and evaluation score corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, including: determining, for at least one second-level evaluation indicator, the product of the second-level indicator weight and the evaluation score corresponding to the second-level evaluation indicator to obtain the second-level evaluation score corresponding to the second-level evaluation indicator; and summing the second-level evaluation scores corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator to obtain the first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator.

[0045] As an optional implementation manner of this embodiment, for at least one secondary evaluation indicator, the product between the secondary indicator weight and the evaluation score corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator can be determined, and the product is used as the secondary evaluation score corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator. Further, the secondary evaluation scores corresponding to at least one secondary evaluation indicator can be summed, and the obtained sum is used as the first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator. Further, in the case of obtaining the first-level evaluation score corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, for at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the product between the first-level indicator weight and the first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator can be determined, and the product is used as the score to be superimposed corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator. Further, the scores to be superimposed corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator can be summed, and the obtained sum is used as the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured.

[0046] S130. Determine a processing method corresponding to the object to be tested according to the safety literacy score.

[0047] Among them, the processing method can be to carry out targeted processing on the subject to be tested according to the safety literacy score of the subject to be tested, so as to improve the safety management level. Optionally, the processing method may include waiting for work and reducing salary, no processing or increasing salary, etc. Different processing methods can correspond to different safety literacy score standards.

[0048] In this embodiment, when the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested is obtained, the safety literacy score can be compared with a predetermined safety literacy score standard to determine the safety literacy score standard that the safety literacy score complies with. Furthermore, the processing method corresponding to the object to be tested can be determined based on the association between the pre-established score standard and the processing method.

[0049] Optionally, a treatment method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined according to the safety literacy score, including: when the safety literacy score does not reach the first literacy score standard, the treatment method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined as waiting for work and reducing salary; when the safety literacy score reaches the first literacy score standard but does not reach the second literacy score standard, the treatment method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined as no treatment; when the safety literacy score reaches the second literacy score, the treatment method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined as salary increase.

[0050] Among them, the first literacy score standard can be a predetermined minimum standard for evaluating whether the safety literacy of the object to be tested meets the standard. The first literacy score standard can be an arbitrary value, and optionally, it is 60 points. The second literacy score standard can be a predetermined standard for evaluating whether the safety literacy of the object to be tested is excellent. The second literacy score standard can be an arbitrary value, and optionally, it is 85 points. It should be noted that the first literacy score standard is lower than the second literacy score standard.

[0051] As an optional implementation manner of the present embodiment, when the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested is obtained, the safety literacy score can be compared with a predetermined literacy score standard. Further, when it is determined that the safety literacy score does not reach the first literacy score standard, the corresponding treatment method for the object to be tested can be determined as waiting for work and reducing wages. When it is determined that the safety literacy score reaches the first literacy score standard and does not reach the second literacy score standard, the corresponding treatment method for the object to be tested can be determined as no treatment. When it is determined that the safety literacy score reaches the second literacy score, the corresponding treatment method for the object to be tested can be determined as a salary increase.

[0052] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention obtains the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be measured in the target safety literacy system; wherein, the target safety literacy system includes at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, and further, according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator and the evaluation score, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, and then, according to the safety literacy score, the processing method corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, which solves the problem that the evaluation method in the related technology is incomplete and lacks individual targeting, and then, leads to a low accuracy rate of the personnel safety literacy assessment results, and achieves the effect of personalized and targeted evaluation of the safety literacy of the object to be measured based on the target safety literacy system, thereby improving the accuracy of the safety literacy assessment of the object to be measured and reducing the human accident rate.

[0053] Embodiment 2

[0054] Figure 2It is a flow chart of a safety literacy assessment method provided in the second embodiment of the present invention. On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiment, before obtaining the target safety literacy system, the effectiveness of each safety literacy system to be tested can be tested first, and when it is determined that the safety literacy system to be tested meets the preset standard, the safety literacy system to be tested can be used as the target safety literacy system. The specific implementation method can refer to the technical solution of this embodiment. Among them, the technical terms that are the same or similar to those in the above-mentioned embodiment are not repeated here.

[0055] like Figure 2 As shown, the method includes:

[0056] S210. For each safety literacy system to be tested, obtain the primary indicator correlation relationship and the secondary indicator correlation relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested.

[0057] Among them, the safety literacy system to be tested may be a pre-constructed safety literacy system to be evaluated. The safety literacy system to be tested may include at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator. It should be noted that the number and specific indicators of the first-level evaluation indicators and the number and specific indicators of the second-level evaluation indicators included in each safety literacy system to be tested are different. The first-level indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two first-level evaluation indicators in at least one first-level evaluation indicator. Exemplarily, it is assumed that the first-level evaluation indicators included in the first-level indicator association relationship are the safety core layer, the safety culture layer, and the safety and health layer. The first-level indicator association relationship can be used to indicate the importance between any two first-level evaluation indicators in the safety core layer, the safety culture layer, and the safety and health layer. The second-level indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two second-level evaluation indicators in at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator. It should be noted that the number of second-level indicator association relationships is consistent with the number of first-level evaluation indicators. Optionally, both the first-level indicator association relationship and the second-level indicator association relationship can be represented in the form of a judgment matrix. Specifically, a first-level indicator judgment matrix can be constructed, and the first-level indicator association relationship can be determined based on the first-level indicator judgment matrix. Each element in the first-level indicator judgment matrix represents the importance ratio of one first-level evaluation indicator relative to another first-level evaluation. For example, 1-9 and its reciprocal can be used as the importance ratio, where 1 means that the two elements are equally important; 3, 5, 7, 9 respectively represent that one element is slightly more important, obviously more important, strongly more important, and extremely more important than another element; 2, 4, 6, 8 represent the median of 2 adjacent odd scales. Assuming that the first-level indicator association relationship is the first-level indicator judgment matrix shown in Table 1, as shown in Table 1, the importance ratio between the safety culture layer and the safety core layer is 5, which can indicate that the safety culture layer is obviously more important than the safety core layer; the importance ratio between the safety and health layer and the safety core layer is 3, which can indicate that the safety and health layer is slightly more important than the safety core layer; the importance ratio between the safety culture layer and the safety and health layer is 2, which can indicate that the importance of the safety culture layer relative to the safety and health layer is between the same importance and slightly important.

[0058] Table 1. First-level indicator judgment matrix

[0059] Safety literacy indicators Security core layer Safety culture layer Safety and health layer Security core layer 1 5 3 Safety culture layer 1 / 5 1 1 / 2 Safety and health layer 1 / 3 2 1

[0060] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, after pre-constructing at least one safety literacy system to be tested, for each safety literacy system to be tested, a first-level indicator judgment matrix corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested can be constructed based on the relative importance between each first-level evaluation indicator in the safety literacy system to be tested. Furthermore, the first-level indicator correlation relationship can be determined based on the first-level indicator judgment matrix. And, a second-level indicator judgment matrix corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested can be constructed based on the relative importance between each second-level evaluation indicator in the safety literacy system to be tested. Furthermore, the second-level indicator correlation relationship can be determined based on the second-level indicator judgment matrix.

[0061] S220. Determine a first indicator weight and a first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to the correlation relationship between the first-level indicators corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested.

[0062] The first indicator weight includes the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator. The first consistency ratio can be understood as the consistency ratio of the first-level evaluation indicator. It can be understood that the consistency ratio can be used to evaluate the consistency degree of the judgment matrix.

[0063] In this embodiment, when the first-level indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested is obtained, the first indicator weight and the first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator can be determined according to the first-level indicator association relationship.

[0064] Optionally, based on the correlation relationship between the first-level indicators corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested, the first indicator weight corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator is determined, including: determining the characteristic vector corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator based on the correlation relationship between the first-level indicators corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; normalizing each characteristic vector to obtain the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator, and constructing the first indicator weight corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator based on the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator.

[0065] Among them, the eigenvector can be understood as a non-zero vector that keeps the same direction under matrix transformation. In general, the eigenvector corresponding to each first-level evaluation index can be determined by numerical calculation.

[0066] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, when the first-level indicator correlation relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested is obtained, the characteristic vector calculation can be performed on the importance ratio included in the first-level indicator correlation relationship. Then, the characteristic vector corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator can be obtained. Furthermore, each characteristic vector can be normalized, and the value obtained after normalization is used as the first-level indicator weight corresponding to the corresponding first-level evaluation indicator. Then, the first indicator weight corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator can be determined according to each first-level indicator weight.

[0067] Exemplarily, continuing to refer to the above example, it is assumed that the first-level association relationship is a judgment matrix shown in Table 1. The nth root of the product of each row element in the judgment matrix can be calculated based on the following formula:

[0068]

[0069] Among them, W i Represents the eigenvector of the i-th level evaluation index; a ij Represents the element in the i-th row and j-th column of the judgment matrix.

[0070] Furthermore, each eigenvector is normalized, and the normalized eigenvector is used as the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each first-level evaluation indicator.

[0071] In this embodiment, when the primary indicator association relationship is obtained, the first consistency ratio corresponding to the primary evaluation indicator can also be determined according to the primary indicator association relationship.

[0072] Optionally, the first consistency ratio can be determined by the following steps: determine the maximum eigenvalue corresponding to the first-level indicator correlation relationship based on the first-level indicator correlation relationship; determine the consistency index based on the maximum eigenvalue; determine the average random consistency index based on a preset average random consistency table and the first-level indicator correlation relationship; determine the ratio between the consistency index and the average random consistency index to obtain the first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator.

[0073] The maximum eigenvalue may be the maximum value among the eigenvalues. The consistency index is a quantitative standard for measuring the degree of uniformity between different variables in a system or process. The average random consistency table may be a predetermined table for characterizing the association between different orders and the average random consistency index. In this embodiment, the order may be the number of primary evaluation indicators included in the primary indicator association relationship.

[0074] As an optional implementation of this embodiment, at least one characteristic value may be determined according to the primary index association relationship. Then, a maximum value may be determined from the at least one characteristic value, and the maximum value may be used as the maximum characteristic value.

[0075] Exemplarily, the characteristic value may be determined based on the following formula:

[0076] |A-λI|=0

[0077] Among them, A represents the correlation relationship of the first-level indicators; λ represents the eigenvalue; and I represents the unit matrix.

[0078] Furthermore, the consistency index may be determined according to the maximum eigenvalue and the number of first-level evaluation indicators included in the first-level indicator association relationship.

[0079] Exemplarily, the consistency index may be determined based on the following formula:

[0080]

[0081] Where CI represents the consistency index; λ max represents the maximum eigenvalue; n represents the number of first-level evaluation indicators.

[0082] Furthermore, a query may be performed from a preset average random consistency table according to the number of first-level evaluation indicators included in the first-level indicator association relationship to obtain an average random consistency indicator corresponding to the number.

[0083] Exemplarily, the average random consistency table may be shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, assuming that the number of primary evaluation indicators is 3, the average random consistency indicator may be determined to be 0.58.

[0084] Table 2 Average random consistency table

[0085] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41

[0086] Furthermore, a ratio between the consistency index and the average random consistency index may be determined, and the ratio may be used as a first consistency ratio corresponding to the primary evaluation index.

[0087] S230. Determine the second indicator weight and the second consistency ratio corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator according to the correlation relationship between the secondary indicators corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested.

[0088] Among them, the second indicator weight includes the secondary indicator weight corresponding to each secondary evaluation indicator. The second consistency ratio can be a consistency ratio corresponding to at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator. Exemplarily, it is assumed that at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator includes security knowledge, security skills, security awareness and risk management. The second consistency ratio can be a consistency ratio corresponding to security knowledge, security skills, security awareness and risk management, which is a numerical value used to evaluate the degree of consistency of security knowledge, security skills, security awareness and risk management.

[0089] In this embodiment, the method for determining the second indicator weight and the second consistency ratio is consistent with the method for determining the first indicator weight and the first consistency ratio, which will not be described in detail here. The specific implementation method can refer to step S220.

[0090] S240: When both the first consistency ratio and the second consistency ratio are less than preset values, the safety literacy system to be tested is determined as the target safety literacy system.

[0091] Among them, the preset value is an arbitrary value, optional, and is 0.1.

[0092] In this embodiment, when the first consistency ratio and the second consistency ratio corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested are both less than the preset values, it can be determined that each first-level evaluation indicator included in the safety literacy system to be tested and each second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator have satisfactory consistency and meet the consistency requirements. Furthermore, the safety literacy system to be tested can be used as the target safety literacy system to evaluate the safety literacy of the object to be tested based on the target safety literacy system.

[0093] S250. Obtain the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator.

[0094] S260. Determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator, and the evaluation score.

[0095] S270. Determine a treatment method corresponding to the object to be tested according to the safety literacy score.

[0096] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention obtains the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be measured in the target safety literacy system; wherein, the target safety literacy system includes at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, and further, according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator and the evaluation score, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, and then, according to the safety literacy score, the processing method corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, which solves the problem that the evaluation method in the related technology is incomplete and lacks individual targeting, and then, leads to a low accuracy rate of the personnel safety literacy assessment results, and achieves the effect of personalized and targeted evaluation of the safety literacy of the object to be measured based on the target safety literacy system, thereby improving the accuracy of the safety literacy assessment of the object to be measured and reducing the human accident rate.

[0097] Embodiment 3

[0098] Figure 3 Schematic diagram of a safety literacy assessment device provided by Embodiment 3 of the present invention. Figure 3 As shown, the device includes: an evaluation score acquisition module 310, a safety literacy score determination module 320 and an object processing method determination module 330.

[0099] Among them, the evaluation score acquisition module 310 is used to obtain the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, and the second-level evaluation indicator is subordinate to the first-level evaluation indicator; the safety literacy score determination module 320 is used to determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested based on the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators and the evaluation score; the object processing method determination module 330 is used to determine the processing method corresponding to the object to be tested based on the safety literacy score.

[0100] The technical solution of the embodiment of the present invention obtains the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be measured in the target safety literacy system; wherein, the target safety literacy system includes at least one first-level evaluation indicator and at least one second-level evaluation indicator associated with the first-level evaluation indicator, and further, according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one first-level evaluation indicator, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one second-level evaluation indicator and the evaluation score, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, and then, according to the safety literacy score, the processing method corresponding to the object to be measured is determined, which solves the problem that the evaluation method in the related technology is incomplete and lacks individual targeting, and then, leads to a low accuracy rate of the personnel safety literacy assessment results, and achieves the effect of personalized and targeted evaluation of the safety literacy of the object to be measured based on the target safety literacy system, thereby improving the accuracy of the safety literacy assessment of the object to be measured and reducing the human accident rate.

[0101] Optionally, at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators includes the safety core layer, the safety culture layer and the safety and health layer; at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the safety core layer includes safety knowledge, safety skills, safety awareness and risk management; at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the safety culture layer includes safety education and safety culture; and at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the safety and health layer includes physical health and mental health.

[0102] Optionally, the safety literacy score determination module 320 includes: a primary assessment score determination unit and a safety literacy score determination unit.

[0103] a first-level evaluation score determination unit, configured to determine, for at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, a first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to a second-level indicator weight and an evaluation score corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the first-level evaluation indicator;

[0104] The safety literacy score determination unit is used to determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators and the first-level evaluation score.

[0105] Optionally, the first-level assessment score determination unit includes: a second-level assessment score determination sub-unit and a first-level assessment score determination sub-unit.

[0106] A secondary evaluation score determination subunit is used to determine, for at least one of the secondary evaluation indicators, the product between the secondary indicator weight corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator and the evaluation score, so as to obtain the secondary evaluation score corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator;

[0107] The first-level evaluation score determination subunit is used to sum the second-level evaluation scores corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators to obtain the first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator.

[0108] Optionally, the device also includes: an association relationship acquisition module, a first consistency ratio determination module, a second consistency ratio determination module and a target safety literacy system determination module.

[0109] An association relationship acquisition module is used to obtain, for each safety literacy system to be tested, a primary indicator association relationship and a secondary indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested, wherein the safety literacy system to be tested includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator; the primary indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two primary evaluation indicators in at least one of the primary evaluation indicators; the secondary indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two secondary evaluation indicators in at least one of the secondary evaluation indicators associated with the primary evaluation indicator;

[0110] A first consistency ratio determination module is used to determine a first indicator weight and a first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to the first-level indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; wherein the first indicator weight includes the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators; and

[0111] A second consistency ratio determination module is used to determine the second indicator weight and the second consistency ratio corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator according to the secondary indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; wherein the second indicator weight includes the secondary indicator weight corresponding to each of the secondary evaluation indicators;

[0112] The target safety literacy system determination module is used to determine the safety literacy system to be tested as the target safety literacy system when the first consistency ratio and the second consistency ratio are both less than preset values.

[0113] Optionally, the first indicator weight is determined by the following steps: determining the characteristic vector corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators based on the correlation relationship between the first-level indicators corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; normalizing each of the characteristic vectors to obtain the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators, and constructing the first indicator weight corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator based on the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators.

[0114] Optionally, the first consistency ratio is determined by the following steps: determining the maximum eigenvalue corresponding to the first-level indicator association relationship based on the first-level indicator association relationship; determining the consistency index based on the maximum eigenvalue and the first-level indicator association relationship; determining the average random consistency index based on a preset average random consistency table and the first-level indicator association relationship; determining the ratio between the consistency index and the average random consistency index to obtain the first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator.

[0115] The safety literacy assessment device provided in the embodiment of the present invention can execute the safety literacy assessment method provided in any embodiment of the present invention, and has the corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the execution method.

[0116] Embodiment 4

[0117] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device 10 that can be used to implement an embodiment of the present invention is shown. The electronic device is intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptop computers, desktop computers, workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframe computers, and other suitable computers. The electronic device can also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital processing, cellular phones, smart phones, wearable devices (such as helmets, glasses, watches, etc.) and other similar computing devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions are merely examples and are not intended to limit the implementation of the present invention described and / or required herein.

[0118] like Figure 4As shown, the electronic device 10 includes at least one processor 11, and a memory connected to the at least one processor 11, such as a read-only memory (ROM) 12, a random access memory (RAM) 13, etc., wherein the memory stores a computer program that can be executed by at least one processor, and the processor 11 can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the computer program stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 12 or the computer program loaded from the storage unit 18 to the random access memory (RAM) 13. In the RAM 13, various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 10 can also be stored. The processor 11, the ROM 12, and the RAM 13 are connected to each other through a bus 14. An input / output (I / O) interface 15 is also connected to the bus 14.

[0119] A number of components in the electronic device 10 are connected to the I / O interface 15, including: an input unit 16, such as a keyboard, a mouse, etc.; an output unit 17, such as various types of displays, speakers, etc.; a storage unit 18, such as a disk, an optical disk, etc.; and a communication unit 19, such as a network card, a modem, a wireless communication transceiver, etc. The communication unit 19 allows the electronic device 10 to exchange information / data with other devices through a computer network such as the Internet and / or various telecommunication networks.

[0120] The processor 11 may be a variety of general and / or special processing components with processing and computing capabilities. Some examples of the processor 11 include, but are not limited to, a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), various special artificial intelligence (AI) computing chips, various processors running machine learning model algorithms, a digital signal processor (DSP), and any appropriate processor, controller, microcontroller, etc. The processor 11 executes the various methods and processes described above, such as the safety literacy assessment method.

[0121] In some embodiments, the safety literacy assessment method may be implemented as a computer program, which is tangibly contained in a computer-readable storage medium, such as a storage unit 18. In some embodiments, part or all of the computer program may be loaded and / or installed on the electronic device 10 via the ROM 12 and / or the communication unit 19. When the computer program is loaded into the RAM 13 and executed by the processor 11, one or more steps of the safety literacy assessment method described above may be performed. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the processor 11 may be configured to execute the safety literacy assessment method in any other appropriate manner (e.g., by means of firmware).

[0122] Various implementations of the systems and techniques described above herein can be implemented in digital electronic circuit systems, integrated circuit systems, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), application specific standard products (ASSPs), systems on chips (SOCs), load programmable logic devices (CPLDs), computer hardware, firmware, software, and / or combinations thereof. These various implementations can include: being implemented in one or more computer programs that can be executed and / or interpreted on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be a special purpose or general purpose programmable processor that can receive data and instructions from a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device, and transmit data and instructions to the storage system, the at least one input device, and the at least one output device.

[0123] Computer programs for implementing the methods of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages. These computer programs may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, or other programmable data processing device, so that when the computer program is executed by the processor, the functions / operations specified in the flow chart and / or block diagram are implemented. The computer program may be executed entirely on the machine, partially on the machine, partially on the machine and partially on a remote machine as a stand-alone software package, or entirely on a remote machine or server.

[0124] In the context of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium may be a tangible medium that may contain or store a computer program for use by or in combination with an instruction execution system, device or equipment. A computer-readable storage medium may include, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, devices or equipment, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Alternatively, a computer-readable storage medium may be a machine-readable signal medium. A more specific example of a machine-readable storage medium may include an electrical connection based on one or more lines, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0125] To provide interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described herein may be implemented on an electronic device having: a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to the user; and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or trackball) through which the user can provide input to the electronic device. Other types of devices may also be used to provide interaction with the user; for example, the feedback provided to the user may be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user may be received in any form (including acoustic input, voice input, or tactile input).

[0126] The systems and techniques described herein may be implemented in a computing system that includes backend components (e.g., as a data server), or a computing system that includes middleware components (e.g., an application server), or a computing system that includes frontend components (e.g., a user computer with a graphical user interface or a web browser through which a user can interact with implementations of the systems and techniques described herein), or a computing system that includes any combination of such backend components, middleware components, or frontend components. The components of the system may be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include: a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a blockchain network, and the Internet.

[0127] A computing system may include a client and a server. The client and the server are generally remote from each other and usually interact through a communication network. The client and server relationship is generated by computer programs running on the corresponding computers and having a client-server relationship with each other. The server may be a cloud server, also known as a cloud computing server or cloud host, which is a host product in the cloud computing service system to solve the defects of difficult management and weak business scalability in traditional physical hosts and VPS services.

[0128] It should be understood that the various forms of processes shown above can be used to reorder, add or delete steps. For example, the steps described in the present invention can be executed in parallel, sequentially or in different orders, as long as the desired results of the technical solution of the present invention can be achieved, and this document does not limit this.

[0129] The above specific implementations do not constitute a limitation on the protection scope of the present invention. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and substitutions can be made according to design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A safety literacy assessment method, characterized in that: include: Obtaining the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator, and the secondary evaluation indicator is subordinate to the primary evaluation indicator; Determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be measured according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators, and the evaluation score; A processing method corresponding to the object to be tested is determined according to the safety literacy score.

2. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 1, characterized in that: At least one of the first-level evaluation indicators includes a safety core layer, a safety culture layer, and a safety health layer; at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the safety core layer includes safety knowledge, safety skills, safety awareness, and risk management; At least one secondary assessment indicator associated with the safety culture layer includes safety education and safety culture; At least one secondary assessment indicator associated with the safety and health layer includes physical health and mental health.

3. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of determining the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators, and the evaluation score includes: For at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, determine a first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to a second-level indicator weight and an evaluation score corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the first-level evaluation indicator; According to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators and the first-level evaluation score, the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested is determined.

4. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of determining the first-level evaluation score corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to the second-level indicator weight and the evaluation score corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators associated with the first-level evaluation indicator comprises: For at least one of the secondary evaluation indicators, determine the product between the secondary indicator weight corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator and the evaluation score to obtain the secondary evaluation score corresponding to the secondary evaluation indicator; The secondary evaluation scores corresponding to at least one of the secondary evaluation indicators are summed to obtain the primary evaluation score corresponding to the primary evaluation indicator.

5. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: For each safety literacy system to be tested, obtain the primary indicator association relationship and the secondary indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested, wherein the safety literacy system to be tested includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator; the primary indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two primary evaluation indicators in at least one of the primary evaluation indicators; the secondary indicator association relationship is used to indicate the importance between any two secondary evaluation indicators in at least one of the secondary evaluation indicators associated with the primary evaluation indicator; Determine the first indicator weight and the first consistency ratio corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator according to the first-level indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; wherein the first indicator weight includes the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators; and Determine the second indicator weight and the second consistency ratio corresponding to the second evaluation indicator according to the second indicator association relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; wherein the second indicator weight includes the second indicator weight corresponding to each of the second evaluation indicators; When both the first consistency ratio and the second consistency ratio are smaller than preset values, the safety literacy system to be tested is determined as a target safety literacy system.

6. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The first indicator weight is determined by the following steps: Determine a feature vector corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators according to the first-level indicator correlation relationship corresponding to the safety literacy system to be tested; Each of the feature vectors is normalized to obtain a first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators, and a first indicator weight corresponding to the first-level evaluation indicator is constructed based on the first-level indicator weight corresponding to each of the first-level evaluation indicators.

7. The safety literacy assessment method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The first consistency ratio is determined by the following steps: Determine the maximum eigenvalue corresponding to the first-level indicator association relationship according to the first-level indicator association relationship; Determine a consistency index according to the association relationship between the maximum eigenvalue and the primary index; Determine the average random consistency index according to the preset average random consistency table and the association relationship between the first-level index; A ratio between the consistency index and the average random consistency index is determined to obtain a first consistency ratio corresponding to the primary evaluation index.

8. A safety literacy assessment device, characterized in that: include: An evaluation score acquisition module, used to obtain the evaluation scores of each secondary evaluation indicator of the object to be tested in the target safety literacy system; wherein the target safety literacy system includes at least one primary evaluation indicator and at least one secondary evaluation indicator associated with the primary evaluation indicator, and the secondary evaluation indicator is subordinate to the primary evaluation indicator; A safety literacy score determination module, used to determine the safety literacy score corresponding to the object to be tested according to the first-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the first-level evaluation indicators, the second-level indicator weight corresponding to at least one of the second-level evaluation indicators, and the evaluation score; The object processing method determination module is used to determine the processing method corresponding to the object to be tested according to the safety literacy score.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device comprises: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores a computer program that can be executed by the at least one processor, and the computer program is executed by the at least one processor so that the at least one processor can execute the safety literacy assessment method described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions, and the computer instructions are used to enable a processor to implement the safety literacy assessment method described in any one of claims 1-7 when executed.

Images