An audit project management method and system based on automated operation platform

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of project management, and discloses an audit project management method and system based on an automated operation platform, which collects all audit projects within an audit project evaluation time period, extracts the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit projects; analyzes all audit projects according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determines an audit project evaluation sequence; obtains audit response results of audit projects within the audit project evaluation sequence, classifies all audit response results, obtains multiple audit response result sequences, and calculates audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences; extracts all audit response result coefficients, and calculates audit project joint evaluation factors of the audit project evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, and realizes joint evaluation of audit projects with correlation by calculating the audit project joint evaluation factors, thereby improving the evaluation accuracy and evaluation efficiency of the audit projects and ensuring the comprehensiveness of audit project management.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of project management, and in particular to an audit project management method and system based on an automated operation platform. Background Art

[0002] The automated operation platform is a system that integrates data collection, processing, analysis, and decision support functions. It can improve enterprise operational efficiency, reduce human errors, and ensure compliance with business processes. Through efficient data processing and intelligent analysis, the automated operation platform significantly improves the accuracy and timeliness of audit work, while reducing labor costs and creating greater value for enterprises. With the development of information technology and the continuous expansion of enterprise scale, traditional manual auditing methods have gradually exposed problems such as inefficiency and high costs. Therefore, the development of an efficient and accurate audit project evaluation method has become an urgent problem to be solved in the industry.

[0003] The existing audit project evaluation method mainly relies on the analysis and judgment of experienced auditors. This method is time-consuming and easily affected by personal subjective factors. In addition, the existing audit project evaluation method has limitations, which are mainly reflected in the following aspects: 1. Single project evaluation: The current method mainly conducts independent evaluation on a single audit project. This means that the evaluation of each project is based on its own characteristics and standards, without considering the connection or mutual influence with other projects. 2. Lack of synergy considerations: Due to the above reasons, it is difficult to achieve joint evaluation of multiple related projects in actual operation, and it is difficult to fully understand the impact of different projects on the overall goal achievement. Summary of the invention

[0004] In view of this, the present invention proposes an audit project management method and system based on an automated operation platform, aiming to solve the problem that the current technology is unable to conduct joint evaluation of related audit projects, unable to comprehensively consider the connection or mutual influence between various audit projects, and reduces the evaluation accuracy and efficiency of audit projects.

[0005] The present invention proposes an audit project management method based on an automated operation platform, comprising:

[0006] Preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit project, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond one to one;

[0007] Analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results;

[0008] Obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences;

[0009] All audit response result coefficients are extracted, and the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence are calculated based on the audit response result coefficients.

[0010] Furthermore, when analyzing all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions and determining the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results, it includes:

[0011] All audit items are randomly matched in pairs to obtain multiple audit item matching sets;

[0012] Calculate the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and audit conditions;

[0013] Comparing the audit item joint coefficient with the preset audit item joint coefficient, if the audit item joint coefficient is greater than or equal to the preset audit item joint coefficient, generating a first sequence identifier for the corresponding audit item matching set;

[0014] If the audit item joint coefficient is less than the preset audit item joint coefficient, a second sequence identifier is generated for the corresponding audit item matching set;

[0015] Extract the minimum audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the first sequence identifier, and use the minimum audit item joint coefficient as the cluster center to determine the cluster distance between the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the second sequence identifier and the minimum audit item joint coefficient;

[0016] Sort all cluster distances from small to large, extract the audit item matching sets corresponding to the first q cluster distances, and generate the third sequence identifier;

[0017] The audit item evaluation sequence is determined according to the audit item matching set corresponding to the first sequence identifier and the third sequence identifier.

[0018] Furthermore, when calculating the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and the audit condition, it includes:

[0019] ;

[0020] ;

[0021] ;

[0022] ;

[0023] Among them, b is the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, c is the average number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, k is the variance of the number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, d1 is the number of audit directions of one audit item in the audit item matching set, and d2 is the number of audit directions of another audit item in the audit item matching set.

[0024] Further, when obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences, it includes:

[0025] Calculate the sequence mean and sequence variance corresponding to the audit response result sequence, compare the numerical values ​​of the sequence mean and the sequence variance, use the smaller numerical value as the first sequence division value, and use the larger numerical value as the second sequence division value;

[0026] Classify all audit response results that are smaller than the first sequence division value into the first audit response result sequence;

[0027] Classify all audit response results that are greater than or equal to the first sequence division value and less than the second sequence division value into the second audit response result sequence;

[0028] Classify all audit response results greater than or equal to the second sequence division value into a third audit response result sequence;

[0029] An audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence.

[0030] Further, when calculating the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence, it includes:

[0031] The audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the following formula:

[0032] ;

[0033] Where s is the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence, a1 is the first calculation coefficient, n1 is the number of audit response results in the first audit response result sequence, u1 is the first sequence division value, p i is the i-th audit response result in the first audit response result sequence, (u1-p i ) min For all (u1-p i ), a2 is the second calculation coefficient, n2 is the number of audit response results in the second audit response result sequence, u2 is the second sequence division value, y j is the jth audit response result in the second audit response result sequence, (u2-y j ) min For all (u2-y j ), t is the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient determined according to the third audit response result sequence, a1+a2=1, and a1>a2.

[0034] Furthermore, the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient is determined according to the following steps:

[0035] Counting the number n3 of audit response results in the third audit response result sequence;

[0036] Presetting a first preset adjustment factor, a second preset adjustment factor, and a third preset adjustment factor;

[0037] When n3 / (n1+n2)<1, the third preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient;

[0038] When 1≤n3 / (n1+n2)<1.1, the second preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient;

[0039] When 1.1≤n3 / (n1+n2), the first preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient.

[0040] Further, when all audit response result coefficients are extracted and the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence are calculated according to the audit response result coefficients, it includes:

[0041] Extracting the same audit response result coefficient from all audit response result coefficients, and obtaining multiple audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0042] Count the number of first audit response result coefficient combinations of audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0043] Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of all audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating the first audit response result coefficient and value;

[0044] Obtaining a pre-calculated audit response result coefficient variance, eliminating all audit response result coefficient combinations that are smaller than the audit response result coefficient variance, and counting the number of second audit response result coefficient combinations of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0045] Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating a second audit response result coefficient and value;

[0046] The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, the sum of the first audit response result coefficients and the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

[0047] Further, when calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the first audit response result coefficient combination number, the second audit response result coefficient combination number, the first audit response result coefficient sum value and the second audit response result coefficient sum value, it includes:

[0048] The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the following formula:

[0049] ;

[0050] Among them, r is the audit project joint evaluation factor of the audit project evaluation sequence, e1 is the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, e2 is the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, w1 is the sum of the first audit response result coefficients, and w2 is the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

[0051] Furthermore, after extracting all audit response result coefficients and calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, it also includes:

[0052] Generating a judgment mark for the audit item evaluation sequence according to the relationship between the audit item joint evaluation factor and the preset audit item joint evaluation factor;

[0053] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is less than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, a substandard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence;

[0054] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is equal to the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an equal standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence;

[0055] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is greater than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an over-standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence.

[0056] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0057] The present invention discloses an audit project management method and system based on an automated operation platform, which collects all audit projects within an audit project evaluation time period, extracts the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit projects; analyzes all audit projects according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determines an audit project evaluation sequence; obtains the audit response results of the audit projects within the audit project evaluation sequence, classifies all the audit response results, obtains multiple audit response result sequences, and calculates the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences; extracts all the audit response result coefficients, and calculates the audit project joint evaluation factors of the audit project evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, and by calculating the audit project joint evaluation factors, realizes the joint evaluation of related audit projects, improves the evaluation accuracy and evaluation efficiency of the audit projects, and ensures the comprehensiveness of audit project management.

[0058] On the other hand, the present application also provides an audit project management system based on an automated operation platform, including:

[0059] An extraction module is used to preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit project, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond to each other one by one;

[0060] A determination module, used to analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results;

[0061] A calculation module, used to obtain the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classify all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculate the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences;

[0062] The evaluation module is used to extract all audit response result coefficients and calculate the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence based on the audit response result coefficients.

[0063] It is understandable that the audit project management system and method based on the automated operation platform provided above have the same beneficial effects and will not be repeated here. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0064] Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reading the detailed description of the preferred embodiments below. The accompanying drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be considered as limiting the present invention. Moreover, the same reference symbols are used throughout the accompanying drawings to represent the same components. In the accompanying drawings:

[0065] Figure 1 A flowchart of an audit project management method based on an automated operation platform provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0066] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the structure of an audit project management system based on an automated operation platform provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0067] Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the accompanying drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure can be implemented in various forms and should not be limited by the embodiments described herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided in order to enable a more thorough understanding of the present disclosure and to fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that, in the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present invention and the features described in the embodiments can be combined with each other. The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and in combination with the embodiments.

[0068] like Figure 1 As shown, in some embodiments of the present application, this embodiment provides an audit project management method based on an automated operation platform, including:

[0069] S110: Preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit projects, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond to each other one by one;

[0070] In this embodiment, the audit project evaluation time period is a specific time period, such as December 1, 2024 to December 5, 2024, and all audit projects within this time period are collected. The audit project evaluation time period can also be adjusted according to actual needs.

[0071] In this embodiment, the audit direction includes the degree of project incompletion, project delay, project budget cost, project risk rate, etc. The audit conditions correspond to the audit directions one by one, that is, the numerical standards preset for the audit directions. For example, the audit condition corresponding to the degree of project incompletion is 10%, the audit condition corresponding to the project delay is 5%, and the audit condition corresponding to the project risk rate is 8%. The specific conditions can also be adjusted according to actual needs.

[0072] S120: Analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results;

[0073] In some embodiments of the present application, when all audit items are analyzed according to the audit direction and the audit condition, and the audit item evaluation sequence is determined based on the analysis result, it includes:

[0074] All audit items are randomly matched in pairs to obtain multiple audit item matching sets;

[0075] Calculate the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and audit conditions;

[0076] Comparing the audit item joint coefficient with the preset audit item joint coefficient, if the audit item joint coefficient is greater than or equal to the preset audit item joint coefficient, generating a first sequence identifier for the corresponding audit item matching set;

[0077] If the audit item joint coefficient is less than the preset audit item joint coefficient, a second sequence identifier is generated for the corresponding audit item matching set;

[0078] Extract the minimum audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the first sequence identifier, and use the minimum audit item joint coefficient as the cluster center to determine the cluster distance between the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the second sequence identifier and the minimum audit item joint coefficient;

[0079] Sort all cluster distances from small to large, extract the audit item matching sets corresponding to the first q cluster distances, and generate the third sequence identifier;

[0080] The audit item evaluation sequence is determined according to the audit item matching set corresponding to the first sequence identifier and the third sequence identifier.

[0081] In this embodiment, if there is still a single unmatched audit item after all audit items are matched pairwise, this audit item is deleted.

[0082] In this embodiment, the preset audit item joint coefficient is preferably 8, and can be adjusted according to actual needs.

[0083] In this embodiment, the method for determining the clustering distance will not be described in detail.

[0084] In this embodiment, q is preferably 3, and can be adjusted according to actual needs.

[0085] In this embodiment, the audit item evaluation sequence is determined according to the audit items of the audit item matching set corresponding to the first sequence identifier and the third sequence identifier.

[0086] In this embodiment, after determining the first audit item evaluation sequence according to the first sequence identifier and the third sequence identifier, all audit items are randomly matched one by one again, and the above steps are repeated to obtain a second audit item evaluation sequence. All audit items are randomly matched one by one for the third time, and the above steps are repeated to obtain a third audit item evaluation sequence. The first audit item evaluation sequence, the second audit item evaluation sequence, and the third audit item evaluation sequence are analyzed, and the audit items that exist simultaneously in these three sequences are counted as the final audit item evaluation sequence, which can ensure the accuracy of determining the audit item evaluation sequence.

[0087] The beneficial effect of the above technical solution is that the present invention can obtain related audit items by calculating the joint coefficient of audit items, provide a basis for calculating the joint evaluation factors of subsequent audit items, and ensure the overall evaluation accuracy.

[0088] In some embodiments of the present application, when calculating the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and the audit condition, it includes:

[0089] ;

[0090] ;

[0091] ;

[0092] ;

[0093] Among them, b is the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, c is the average number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, k is the variance of the number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, d1 is the number of audit directions of one audit item in the audit item matching set, and d2 is the number of audit directions of another audit item in the audit item matching set.

[0094] S130: obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences;

[0095] In some embodiments of the present application, when obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences, it includes:

[0096] Calculate the sequence mean and sequence variance corresponding to the audit response result sequence, compare the numerical values ​​of the sequence mean and the sequence variance, use the smaller numerical value as the first sequence division value, and use the larger numerical value as the second sequence division value;

[0097] Classify all audit response results that are smaller than the first sequence division value into the first audit response result sequence;

[0098] Classify all audit response results that are greater than or equal to the first sequence division value and less than the second sequence division value into the second audit response result sequence;

[0099] Classify all audit response results greater than or equal to the second sequence division value into a third audit response result sequence;

[0100] An audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence.

[0101] In this embodiment, the audit response result corresponds to the above-mentioned audit direction and audit conditions, and belongs to the actual audit result of the audit project. The above-mentioned audit conditions are set in advance. For example, the audit response result of an audit project is the project incompletion degree (20%), project risk rate (4%), etc., which will not be shown one by one here.

[0102] In this embodiment, all audit response results are classified to obtain multiple audit response result sequences. Classification here means dividing the same audit response result into the same audit response result sequence. For example, if all project incompletion levels are divided into one audit response result sequence, then the audit response results in this audit response result sequence are all project incompletion levels.

[0103] In this embodiment, since the sequence mean and the sequence variance are two numerical values, the larger and the smaller one can be clearly determined. If the two are equal, all audit response results that are less than the sequence mean (or sequence variance) are divided into the first audit response result sequence, all audit response results that are equal to the sequence mean (or sequence variance) are divided into the second audit response result sequence, and all audit response results that are greater than the sequence mean (or sequence variance) are divided into the third audit response result sequence. The rest of the calculation methods are the same.

[0104] The beneficial effect of the above technical solution is: the present invention calculates the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence, which not only ensures the calculation accuracy of the audit response result coefficient, but also provides a calculation basis for the calculation of the joint evaluation factor of the audit project, thereby ensuring the calculation accuracy of the joint evaluation factor of the audit project.

[0105] In some embodiments of the present application, when calculating the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence, it includes:

[0106] The audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the following formula:

[0107] ;

[0108] Where s is the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence, a1 is the first calculation coefficient, n1 is the number of audit response results in the first audit response result sequence, u1 is the first sequence division value, p i is the i-th audit response result in the first audit response result sequence, (u1-p i ) min For all (u1-p i ), a2 is the second calculation coefficient, n2 is the number of audit response results in the second audit response result sequence, u2 is the second sequence division value, y j is the jth audit response result in the second audit response result sequence, (u2-y j ) min For all (u2-y j ), t is the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient determined according to the third audit response result sequence, a1+a2=1, and a1>a2.

[0109] In some embodiments of the present application, the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient is determined according to the following steps:

[0110] Counting the number n3 of audit response results in the third audit response result sequence;

[0111] Presetting a first preset adjustment factor, a second preset adjustment factor, and a third preset adjustment factor;

[0112] When n3 / (n1+n2)<1, the third preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient;

[0113] When 1≤n3 / (n1+n2)<1.1, the second preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient;

[0114] When 1.1≤n3 / (n1+n2), the first preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient.

[0115] In this embodiment, the first preset adjustment factor is preferably 0.85, the second preset adjustment factor is preferably 1.05, and the third preset adjustment factor is preferably 1.25, which can be adjusted according to actual conditions.

[0116] The beneficial effect of the above technical solution is: the present invention selects the corresponding preset adjustment factor as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient according to the audit response result number n3 of the third audit response result, further ensures the comprehensiveness of the calculation of the audit response result coefficient, and realizes the dynamic adjustment of the audit response result coefficient.

[0117] S140: extract all audit response result coefficients, and calculate the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients.

[0118] In some embodiments of the present application, when extracting all audit response result coefficients and calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, it includes:

[0119] Extracting the same audit response result coefficient from all audit response result coefficients, and obtaining multiple audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0120] Count the number of first audit response result coefficient combinations of audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0121] Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of all audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating the first audit response result coefficient and value;

[0122] Obtaining a pre-calculated audit response result coefficient variance, eliminating all audit response result coefficient combinations that are smaller than the audit response result coefficient variance, and counting the number of second audit response result coefficient combinations of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations;

[0123] Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating a second audit response result coefficient and value;

[0124] The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, the sum of the first audit response result coefficients and the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

[0125] In this embodiment, the audit response result coefficient variance refers to the variance corresponding to all audit response result coefficients.

[0126] The beneficial effect of the above technical solution is: the present invention calculates the audit project joint evaluation factor of the audit project evaluation sequence according to the number of first audit response result coefficient combinations, the number of second audit response result coefficient combinations, the sum of the first audit response result coefficients and the sum of the second audit response result coefficients, thereby avoiding the errors and subjectivity existing in manual evaluation, realizing the joint evaluation of related audit projects, improving the evaluation accuracy and efficiency of audit projects, and ensuring the comprehensiveness of audit project management.

[0127] In some embodiments of the present application, when calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the first audit response result coefficient combination number, the second audit response result coefficient combination number, the first audit response result coefficient sum value, and the second audit response result coefficient sum value, it includes:

[0128] The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the following formula:

[0129] ;

[0130] Among them, r is the audit project joint evaluation factor of the audit project evaluation sequence, e1 is the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, e2 is the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, w1 is the sum of the first audit response result coefficients, and w2 is the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

[0131] In some embodiments of the present application, after extracting all audit response result coefficients and calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, it also includes:

[0132] Generating a judgment mark for the audit item evaluation sequence according to the relationship between the audit item joint evaluation factor and the preset audit item joint evaluation factor;

[0133] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is less than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, a substandard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence;

[0134] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is equal to the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an equal standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence;

[0135] When the audit item joint evaluation factor is greater than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an over-standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence.

[0136] In this embodiment, the preset audit item joint evaluation factor is preferably 6, and can be adjusted according to actual conditions.

[0137] In this embodiment, the under-standard judgment mark: when the audit project joint evaluation factor is less than the preset audit project joint evaluation factor, it indicates that the corresponding audit project has not met the expected standards or requirements, so as to prompt the relevant parties to pay attention to and improve the problems in the corresponding audit project. The equal standard judgment mark: if the audit project joint evaluation factor is equal to the preset audit project joint evaluation factor, it means that the corresponding audit project meets the preset standards and expectations. The over-standard judgment mark: when the audit project joint evaluation factor is greater than the preset audit project joint evaluation factor, it indicates that the corresponding audit project has exceeded the expected standards or performed well in some aspects.

[0138] The beneficial effect of the above technical solution is that the present invention can take into account the connection or mutual influence between audit projects, ensure synergy considerations, realize joint evaluation of multiple related projects, and fully understand the impact of different projects on the achievement of overall goals.

[0139] like Figure 2 As shown, in another preferred embodiment based on the above embodiment, this embodiment provides an audit project management system based on an automated operation platform, including:

[0140] An extraction module is used to preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit project, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond to each other one by one;

[0141] A determination module, used to analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results;

[0142] A calculation module, used to obtain the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classify all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculate the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences;

[0143] The evaluation module is used to extract all audit response result coefficients and calculate the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence based on the audit response result coefficients.

[0144] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the present application may be provided as methods, systems or computer program products. Therefore, the present application may take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Moreover, the present application may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0145] The present application is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems) and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that each process and / or box in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of processes and / or boxes in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0146] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0147] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps for the functions specified in one or more boxes.

[0148] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, ordinary technicians in the relevant field should understand that the specific implementation methods of the present invention can still be modified or replaced by equivalents, and any modifications or equivalent replacements that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention should be covered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. An audit project management method based on an automated operation platform, characterized in that: include: Preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit project, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond one to one; Analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results; Obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences; Extracting all audit response result coefficients, and calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients; When analyzing all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determining the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results, it includes: All audit items are randomly matched in pairs to obtain multiple audit item matching sets; Calculate the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and audit conditions; Comparing the audit item joint coefficient with the preset audit item joint coefficient, if the audit item joint coefficient is greater than or equal to the preset audit item joint coefficient, generating a first sequence identifier for the corresponding audit item matching set; If the audit item joint coefficient is less than the preset audit item joint coefficient, a second sequence identifier is generated for the corresponding audit item matching set; Extract the minimum audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the first sequence identifier, and use the minimum audit item joint coefficient as the cluster center to determine the cluster distance between the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the second sequence identifier and the minimum audit item joint coefficient; Sort all cluster distances from small to large, extract the audit item matching sets corresponding to the first q cluster distances, and generate the third sequence identifier; The audit item evaluation sequence is determined according to the audit item matching set corresponding to the first sequence identifier and the third sequence identifier.

2. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 1 is characterized in that: When calculating the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to each audit item matching set according to the audit direction and the audit condition, it includes: ； ； ； ； Among them, b is the audit item joint coefficient corresponding to the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g1(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit directions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∩f2)| is the number of intersections of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, |g2(f1∪f2)| is the number of unions of the audit conditions of two audit items in the audit item matching set, c is the average number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, k is the variance of the number of audit items in all audit item matching sets, d1 is the number of audit directions of one audit item in the audit item matching set, and d2 is the number of audit directions of another audit item in the audit item matching set.

3. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 1 is characterized in that: When obtaining the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classifying all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculating the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences, it includes: Calculate the sequence mean and sequence variance corresponding to the audit response result sequence, compare the numerical values ​​of the sequence mean and the sequence variance, use the smaller numerical value as the first sequence division value, and use the larger numerical value as the second sequence division value; Classify all audit response results that are smaller than the first sequence division value into the first audit response result sequence; Classify all audit response results that are greater than or equal to the first sequence division value and less than the second sequence division value into the second audit response result sequence; Classify all audit response results greater than or equal to the second sequence division value into a third audit response result sequence; An audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence.

4. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 3 is characterized in that: When calculating the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence according to the first audit response result sequence, the second audit response result sequence and the third audit response result sequence, it includes: The audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence is calculated according to the following formula: ； Where s is the audit response result coefficient of the audit response result sequence, a1 is the first calculation coefficient, n1 is the number of audit response results in the first audit response result sequence, u1 is the first sequence division value, p i is the i-th audit response result in the first audit response result sequence, (u1-p i ) min For all (u1-p i ), a2 is the second calculation coefficient, n2 is the number of audit response results in the second audit response result sequence, u2 is the second sequence division value, y j is the jth audit response result in the second audit response result sequence, (u2-y j ) min For all (u2-y j ), t is the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient determined according to the third audit response result sequence, a1+a2=1, and a1>a2.

5. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 4 is characterized in that: Determine the adjustment factor for the audit response result coefficient according to the following steps: Counting the number n3 of audit response results in the third audit response result sequence; Presetting a first preset adjustment factor, a second preset adjustment factor, and a third preset adjustment factor; When n3 / (n1+n2)<1, the third preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient; When 1≤n3 / (n1+n2)<1.1, the second preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient; When 1.1≤n3 / (n1+n2), the first preset adjustment factor is selected as the adjustment factor of the audit response result coefficient.

6. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 1 is characterized in that: When all audit response result coefficients are extracted and the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence are calculated according to the audit response result coefficients, it includes: Extracting the same audit response result coefficient from all audit response result coefficients, and obtaining multiple audit response result coefficient combinations; Count the number of first audit response result coefficient combinations of audit response result coefficient combinations; Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of all audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating the first audit response result coefficient and value; Obtaining a pre-calculated audit response result coefficient variance, eliminating all audit response result coefficient combinations that are smaller than the audit response result coefficient variance, and counting the number of second audit response result coefficient combinations of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations; Extracting one audit response result coefficient from each of the remaining audit response result coefficient combinations, and calculating a second audit response result coefficient and value; The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, the sum of the first audit response result coefficients and the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

7. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 6 is characterized in that: When calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, the sum of the first audit response result coefficients and the sum of the second audit response result coefficients, it includes: The audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence is calculated according to the following formula: ； Among them, r is the audit project joint evaluation factor of the audit project evaluation sequence, e1 is the number of combinations of the first audit response result coefficients, e2 is the number of combinations of the second audit response result coefficients, w1 is the sum of the first audit response result coefficients, and w2 is the sum of the second audit response result coefficients.

8. The audit project management method based on the automated operation platform according to claim 1 is characterized in that: After extracting all audit response result coefficients and calculating the audit item joint evaluation factor of the audit item evaluation sequence according to the audit response result coefficients, it also includes: Generating a judgment mark for the audit item evaluation sequence according to the relationship between the audit item joint evaluation factor and the preset audit item joint evaluation factor; When the audit item joint evaluation factor is less than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, a substandard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence; When the audit item joint evaluation factor is equal to the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an equal standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence; When the audit item joint evaluation factor is greater than the preset audit item joint evaluation factor, an over-standard evaluation mark is generated for the audit item evaluation sequence.

9. An audit project management system based on an automated operation platform, applied to the audit project management method based on an automated operation platform as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that: include: An extraction module is used to preset an audit project evaluation time period, collect all audit projects within the audit project evaluation time period, and extract the audit direction and audit conditions of the audit project, wherein the audit direction and the audit condition correspond to each other one by one; A determination module, used to analyze all audit items according to the audit direction and audit conditions, and determine the audit item evaluation sequence based on the analysis results; A calculation module, used to obtain the audit response results of the audit items in the audit item evaluation sequence, classify all the audit response results to obtain multiple audit response result sequences, and calculate the audit response result coefficients of the audit response result sequences; The evaluation module is used to extract all audit response result coefficients and calculate the audit item joint evaluation factors of the audit item evaluation sequence based on the audit response result coefficients.

Images