Site selection method and device for offshore photovoltaic project, storage medium and electronic equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a site selection method and device for an offshore photovoltaic project, a storage medium and electronic equipment, and relates to the technical field of computers. The site selection method comprises the following steps: acquiring a first evaluation index set and a second evaluation index set, wherein the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set have an evaluation index intersection or the first evaluation index set comprises the second evaluation index set; carrying out navigation environment analysis on the candidate offshore area by utilizing evaluation indexes in the first evaluation index set to obtain a first score; performing photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area by using evaluation indexes in the second evaluation index set to obtain a second score; and determining a site selection score of the candidate offshore area according to the first score and the second score, and determining that the candidate offshore area is suitable for serving as a photovoltaic array construction area of the offshore photovoltaic project when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a score threshold value. According to the invention, the accuracy of offshore photovoltaic project site selection can be improved.

Description

Background Art

[0002] With the changes in energy production and consumption, the proportion of new energy production has increased, and the proportion of electricity in terminal energy consumption has continued to increase. Among the many ways to generate electricity, the clean and inexhaustible photovoltaic power generation method is the first choice.

[0003] Compared with traditional onshore photovoltaics, offshore photovoltaics has the characteristics of less land occupation and easy integration with other industries. It can help coastal cities break through land constraints and expand the space for new energy development.

[0004] The ocean is vast, but not all offshore areas can be used as good offshore photovoltaic sites. It is necessary to evaluate whether a certain area can be used as an offshore photovoltaic project site. At present, the evaluation method in this regard is usually judged by humans, which is subjective and one-sided, and consumes human resources.

[0005] It should be noted that the information disclosed in the above background technology section is only used to enhance the understanding of the background of the present disclosure, and therefore may include information that does not constitute the prior art known to ordinary technicians in the field. Summary of the invention

[0006] The purpose of the present disclosure is to provide a method and device for site selection of an offshore photovoltaic project, a storage medium and an electronic device, thereby overcoming the problem of inaccurate site selection assessment of an offshore photovoltaic project at least to a certain extent.

[0007] According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, a site selection method for an offshore photovoltaic project is provided, comprising: obtaining a first evaluation index set and a second evaluation index set, wherein the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set have an evaluation index intersection or the first evaluation index set contains the second evaluation index set; performing a navigation environment analysis on a candidate offshore area using the evaluation indexes in the first evaluation index set to obtain a first score; performing a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indexes in the second evaluation index set to obtain a second score; determining a site selection score for the candidate offshore area based on the first score and the second score, and determining that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a photovoltaic array construction area for the offshore photovoltaic project when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a score threshold.

[0008] Optionally, the first evaluation index set includes natural environment indicators, man-made environment indicators, and safety assurance indicators; wherein, the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation index set are used to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area to obtain a first score, including: using the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area to obtain a first intermediate score; using the man-made environment indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area to obtain a second intermediate score; using the safety assurance indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area to obtain a third intermediate score; weighting the first intermediate score, the second intermediate score, and the third intermediate score to obtain a first score.

[0009] Optionally, the navigation environment of the candidate sea area is analyzed using the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first intermediate score, including: performing data standardization on each indicator data included in the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set, and combining the indicator data after data standardization into an indicator vector; inputting the indicator vector into a scoring model to obtain a first intermediate score.

[0010] Optionally, the man-made environment indicators include one or more of port location information, aquaculture area location information, hydraulic structure location information, and ship traffic flow statistics information.

[0011] Optionally, the safety and security indicators include the number of maritime offices within a predetermined range and the distance of each maritime office from the candidate maritime area; wherein, the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area is analyzed using the safety and security indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a third intermediate score, including: determining the score of the candidate maritime area for each maritime office according to a pre-constructed mapping relationship between distance and score and the distance of each maritime office from the candidate maritime area; accumulating the score of each maritime office in the candidate maritime area to obtain an accumulated score; performing coefficient conversion on the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range to obtain a target coefficient; wherein the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range is positively correlated with the target coefficient; and determining the product of the accumulated score and the target coefficient as the third intermediate score.

[0012] Optionally, when the scenario includes multiple candidate offshore areas, the site selection method also includes: determining candidate offshore areas whose site selection scores are greater than or equal to a score threshold to form a set of candidate offshore areas; determining a predetermined number of candidate offshore areas from the set of candidate offshore areas in descending order of the site selection scores; and obtaining information related to each of the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas, summarizing and displaying the information.

[0013] Optionally, a predetermined number of candidate offshore areas include a target offshore area; wherein the site selection method further comprises: when the display interface displays the identification object of each candidate offshore area among the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas, in response to an information retrieval operation for the target offshore area, displaying summary information related to the target offshore area.

[0014] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, a site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project is provided, comprising: an indicator acquisition module, used to acquire a first evaluation indicator set and a second evaluation indicator set, wherein the first evaluation indicator set and the second evaluation indicator set have an evaluation indicator intersection or the first evaluation indicator set contains the second evaluation indicator set; a first scoring module, used to perform a navigation environment analysis on a candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first score; a second scoring module, used to perform a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set to obtain a second score; and a third scoring module, used to determine a site selection score for the candidate offshore area based on the first score and the second score, and when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a scoring threshold, determine that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a photovoltaic array construction area for the offshore photovoltaic project.

[0015] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the above-mentioned method for selecting a site for an offshore photovoltaic project is implemented.

[0016] According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, an electronic device is provided, comprising: a processor; and a memory for storing executable instructions of the processor; the processor is configured to implement the above-mentioned siting method for an offshore photovoltaic project by executing the executable instructions.

[0017] In the technical solutions provided by some embodiments of the present disclosure, the site selection score of the candidate offshore area is determined by performing navigation environment analysis and photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area. In view of the fact that the scenario involves offshore operations, the disclosed solution not only considers the construction of the photovoltaic array area, but also considers the navigation environment, making the site selection evaluation of the offshore photovoltaic offshore area more accurate. In addition, the entire site selection process does not require human participation and is executed by a computer, thereby saving the cost of human analysis.

[0018] It is to be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present disclosure. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] The accompanying drawings herein are incorporated into the specification and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, and together with the specification are used to explain the principles of the present disclosure. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present disclosure, and for ordinary technicians in this field, other accompanying drawings can be obtained based on these accompanying drawings without creative work.

[0020] Figure 1 A flow chart schematically illustrates a method for selecting a site for an offshore photovoltaic project according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0021] Figure 2 The flowchart schematically shows the process of determining the first score according to the embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0022] Figure 3 The flowchart of the process of determining the third intermediate score according to the embodiment of the present disclosure is schematically shown.

[0023] Figure 4 A block diagram of a site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is schematically shown.

[0024] Figure 5 A block diagram of an electronic device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is schematically shown. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0025] Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, example embodiments can be implemented in a variety of forms and should not be construed as being limited to the examples set forth herein; on the contrary, these embodiments are provided so that the present disclosure will be more comprehensive and complete, and the concepts of the example embodiments are fully conveyed to those skilled in the art. The described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in one or more embodiments in any suitable manner. In the following description, many specific details are provided to provide a full understanding of the embodiments of the present disclosure. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the technical solutions of the present disclosure may be practiced while omitting one or more of the specific details, or other methods, components, devices, steps, etc. may be adopted. In other cases, known technical solutions are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring various aspects of the present disclosure.

[0026] In addition, the accompanying drawings are only schematic illustrations of the present disclosure and are not necessarily drawn to scale. The same reference numerals in the figures represent the same or similar parts, and their repeated description will be omitted. Some of the block diagrams shown in the accompanying drawings are functional entities and do not necessarily correspond to physically or logically independent entities. These functional entities can be implemented in software form, or implemented in one or more hardware modules or integrated circuits, or implemented in different networks and / or processor devices and / or microcontroller devices.

[0027] The flowcharts shown in the accompanying drawings are only exemplary and do not necessarily include all the steps. For example, some steps may be decomposed, while some steps may be combined or partially combined, so the actual execution order may change according to the actual situation. In addition, all the terms "first", "second", "third", etc. below are only for the purpose of distinction and should not be used as limitations of the present disclosure.

[0028] The site selection scheme for an offshore photovoltaic project of the embodiment of the present disclosure can be implemented by an electronic device. That is, each step of the site selection method for an offshore photovoltaic project described below can be performed by an electronic device, and the site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project described below can be configured in an electronic device. The present disclosure does not limit the specific form of the electronic device, such as a terminal device, a personal computer, a server, etc.

[0029] Figure 1 The flowchart of the method for selecting a site for an offshore photovoltaic project according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is schematically shown. Figure 1 , the site selection method for the offshore photovoltaic project may include the following steps: S12. Obtain a first evaluation index set and a second evaluation index set, where the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set have an evaluation index intersection or the first evaluation index set includes the second evaluation index set.

[0030] In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set are used to evaluate the navigation environment, and the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set are used to evaluate the suitability of the photovoltaic array area. The suitability of the photovoltaic array area refers to the suitability of building a photovoltaic array area. The photovoltaic array area mentioned in the present disclosure includes offshore photovoltaic module arrays, box-type transformer equipment, maintenance roads, etc.

[0031] The evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set may include, but are not limited to, natural environment indicators, man-made environment indicators, safety assurance indicators, etc.

[0032] Specifically, natural environment indicators may include one or more of meteorological indicators, hydrological indicators, ice condition indicators, geomorphological indicators, and marine disaster indicators, wherein meteorological indicators may include but are not limited to air temperature indicators, precipitation indicators, temperature indicators, wind indicators, fog indicators, etc. Hydrological indicators may include but are not limited to tide indicators, wave indicators, and ocean current indicators, etc. Geomorphological indicators may include but are not limited to seabed elevation indicators, soil layer indicators, and sedimentary layer composition indicators, etc. Marine disaster indicators may include but are not limited to typhoon indicators, storm surge indicators, cold wave indicators, and sea ice indicators, etc.

[0033] Man-made environment indicators may include one or more of port location information, aquaculture area location information, hydraulic structure location information, and ship traffic flow statistics information.

[0034] Safety and security indicators may include the number of maritime offices within a predetermined range and the distance between each maritime office and the candidate offshore area.

[0035] The first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set have an evaluation index intersection or the first evaluation index set includes the second evaluation index set.

[0036] That is to say, in addition to including some of the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set, the second evaluation indicator set may also include evaluation indicators not included in the first evaluation indicator set. For example, considering the long-term reliability of the field equipment, the second evaluation indicator set may also include seawater corrosion indicators. Alternatively, the second evaluation indicator set may be included in the first evaluation indicator set, that is, the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set may be part of the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set. For example, the second evaluation indicator set only includes the above-mentioned natural environment indicators and man-made environment indicators, or only includes some of the evaluation indicators in the above-mentioned natural environment indicators and man-made environment indicators. The present disclosure does not limit this.

[0037] It should be noted that the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set can be pre-configured. In the subsequent use process, each evaluation index can be configured in the form of a vector or matrix in combination with the specific index data for subsequent analysis and calculation.

[0038] S14. Analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first score.

[0039] When the first evaluation index set includes natural environment indexes, man-made environment indexes, and safety assurance indexes, the following can be used: Figure 2 The treatment shown received a first score.

[0040] In step S202, the navigation environment of the candidate sea area is analyzed using the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first intermediate score.

[0041] First, data standardization can be performed on each indicator data included in the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set. Specifically, z-score can be used for standardization, thereby eliminating the calculation influence caused by the measurement unit and the change range.

[0042] Next, the various indicator data after data standardization processing can be combined into an indicator vector. Specifically, the various indicator data can be sorted according to a pre-configured fixed indicator order to form an indicator vector.

[0043] Then, the indicator vector can be input into the scoring model to obtain a first intermediate score.

[0044] According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, the scoring model adopted by the present disclosure may be a prediction model based on a convolutional neural network, and the present disclosure does not impose any restrictions on the model structure and training process.

[0045] According to other embodiments of the present disclosure, the scoring model used in the present disclosure may also be a tree-based model. Specifically, the XGboost algorithm may be used to construct the model, wherein a base classifier or a linear classifier may be used to predict the score value, and the base classifier may use GBTree (General Balanced Trees), thereby improving the processing capability of the model. The present disclosure does not impose any restrictions on the model structure and training process.

[0046] It should be noted that, the higher the first intermediate score is, the better the natural environment of the candidate offshore area is, and the more suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of the natural environment.

[0047] In step S204, the navigation environment of the candidate sea area is analyzed using the man-made environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a second intermediate score.

[0048] Similarly, first, the data of each indicator included in the artificial environment indicator can be subjected to data standardization. Next, the results of the data standardization can be combined into an indicator vector or matrix and input into the scoring model to obtain a second intermediate score. Among them, the scoring model used in this step and the scoring model in step S202 can be a model with the same model structure but different model parameters, and the present disclosure does not limit the model structure and training process.

[0049] It should be noted that, the higher the second intermediate score is, the better the artificial environment of the candidate offshore area is, and the more suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of the artificial environment.

[0050] In step S206, the navigation environment of the candidate sea area is analyzed using the safety assurance indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a third intermediate score.

[0051] According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, similarly, as described above, the scoring model can still be used to obtain the third intermediate score, which will not be described in detail.

[0052] According to other embodiments of the present disclosure, Figure 3 The treatment shown received a third intermediate rating.

[0053] In step S302, the score of the candidate maritime area for each maritime office is determined according to the pre-constructed mapping relationship between the distance and the score and the distance between each maritime office and the candidate maritime area.

[0054] Specifically, in the pre-constructed mapping relationship between the distance and the score, the distance and the score are negatively correlated, that is, the greater the distance, the lower the score; the smaller the distance, the higher the score. In some embodiments, the mapping relationship can be manually defined.

[0055] In step S304, the scores of the candidate maritime areas for each maritime office are accumulated to obtain an accumulated score.

[0056] In step S306, coefficient conversion is performed on the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range to obtain a target coefficient; wherein the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range is positively correlated with the target coefficient.

[0057] That is, the more the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range, the larger the target coefficient; the smaller the number, the smaller the target coefficient. In some embodiments, the mapping process of the coefficient conversion can be manually defined, and the present disclosure does not limit this.

[0058] In step S308, the product of the accumulated score and the target coefficient is determined as the third intermediate score.

[0059] It should be noted that the higher the third intermediate score, the better the safety and security of the candidate offshore area, and the more suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of safety and security.

[0060] In step S208, the first intermediate score, the second intermediate score, and the third intermediate score are weighted to obtain a first score.

[0061] According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, weights may be pre-configured for natural environment indicators, artificial environment indicators, and safety assurance indicators, for example, the weight of natural environment indicators is greater than or equal to the weight of artificial environment indicators, the weight of artificial environment indicators is greater than the weight of safety assurance indicators, etc. The present disclosure does not limit the configuration of weights.

[0062] It should be noted that the higher the first score, the better the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area, and the more suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of navigation environment. The lower the first score, the worse the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area, and the less suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of navigation environment.

[0063] S16. Performing a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set to obtain a second score.

[0064] Except that the second evaluation index set is different from the first evaluation index set, the process of performing the photovoltaic array area suitability analysis is similar to the above step S14 and will not be described in detail.

[0065] It should be noted that the higher the second score, the better the suitability of the candidate offshore photovoltaic array area, and the more suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of photovoltaic array area suitability. The lower the second score, the worse the suitability of the candidate offshore photovoltaic array area, and the less suitable it is for offshore photovoltaic projects in terms of photovoltaic array area suitability.

[0066] In addition, it is understandable that there is no clear execution order relationship between step S14 and step S16. That is, step S16 can also be executed before step S14, or step S16 can be executed at the same time as step S14.

[0067] S18. Determine a site selection score for the candidate offshore area based on the first score and the second score, and determine that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a photovoltaic array installation area for the offshore photovoltaic project when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a score threshold.

[0068] According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, the sum of the first score and the second score may be calculated as the site selection score of the candidate offshore area.

[0069] According to some other embodiments of the present disclosure, the first score and the second score may be weighted, and the result of the weighted processing may be determined as the site selection score of the candidate offshore area.

[0070] After obtaining the site selection score, the electronic device may compare the site selection score with a score threshold, wherein the present disclosure does not limit the specific value of the score threshold.

[0071] When the site selection score is less than the score threshold, it indicates that the candidate offshore area is not suitable as a site selection for an offshore photovoltaic project, that is, it is not suitable as an area for constructing a photovoltaic array for an offshore photovoltaic project.

[0072] When the site selection score is greater than or equal to the score threshold, it indicates that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a site selection for an offshore photovoltaic project, that is, suitable as an area for constructing a photovoltaic array for an offshore photovoltaic project.

[0073] In addition, when the scene includes multiple candidate offshore areas, first, the electronic device can determine the candidate offshore areas whose site selection scores are greater than or equal to the above-mentioned score threshold to form a candidate offshore area set. The candidate offshore area set includes one or more candidate offshore areas.

[0074] Next, the electronic device may determine a predetermined number of candidate offshore areas from the candidate offshore area set in descending order of site selection scores. The present disclosure does not limit the value of the predetermined number, which may be related to the display size of the subsequent display screen, for example, the predetermined number is 3 or 4.

[0075] Subsequently, information related to each of the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas may be obtained, summarized and displayed. Specifically, the summary information related to the candidate offshore areas may include one or more of the area of ​​the candidate offshore area, the longitude and latitude of the candidate offshore area, the shortest distance and the farthest distance of the candidate offshore area from the land, and information of the candidate offshore area corresponding to the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set.

[0076] Any one of the predetermined number of candidate sea areas is used as the target sea area. When the display interface displays the identification objects of each of the predetermined number of candidate sea areas, the information retrieval operation for the target sea area can be responded to, and the summary information related to the target sea area can be displayed. The identification object can include, for example, an image, text, symbol, etc., which is not limited in the present disclosure. The information retrieval operation can include a click operation, a press operation, a box selection operation, etc. for the identification object.

[0077] It should be noted that although the steps of the method in the present disclosure are described in a specific order in the drawings, this does not require or imply that the steps must be performed in this specific order, or that all the steps shown must be performed to achieve the desired results. Additionally or alternatively, some steps may be omitted, multiple steps may be combined into one step, and / or one step may be decomposed into multiple steps, etc.

[0078] Furthermore, this example implementation also provides a site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project.

[0079] Figure 4 The block diagram of the site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is schematically shown. Figure 4 According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the site selection device 4 for an offshore photovoltaic project may include an indicator acquisition module 41 , a first scoring module 43 , a second scoring module 45 and a third scoring module 47 .

[0080] Specifically, the indicator acquisition module 41 can be used to obtain a first evaluation indicator set and a second evaluation indicator set, where there is an intersection of evaluation indicators between the first evaluation indicator set and the second evaluation indicator set or the first evaluation indicator set contains the second evaluation indicator set; the first scoring module 43 can be used to use the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to perform a navigation environment analysis on the candidate offshore area to obtain a first score; the second scoring module 45 can be used to use the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set to perform a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area to obtain a second score; the third scoring module 47 can be used to determine the site selection score of the candidate offshore area based on the first score and the second score, and when the site selection score is greater than or equal to the scoring threshold, determine that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a photovoltaic array construction area for an offshore photovoltaic project.

[0081] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the first evaluation index set includes natural environment indicators, man-made environment indicators, and safety assurance indicators. In this case, the first scoring module 43 can be configured to use the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a first intermediate score; use the man-made environment indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a second intermediate score; use the safety assurance indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a third intermediate score; and weight the first intermediate score, the second intermediate score, and the third intermediate score to obtain a first score.

[0082] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the first scoring module 43 can be configured to perform data standardization processing on each indicator data included in the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set, and combine the various indicator data after data standardization processing into an indicator vector; input the indicator vector into the scoring model to obtain a first intermediate score.

[0083] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the man-made environment index may include one or more of port location information, aquaculture area location information, hydraulic structure location information, and ship traffic flow statistics information.

[0084] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the safety and security indicators may include the number of maritime offices within a predetermined range and the distance of each maritime office from the candidate maritime area. In this case, the first scoring module 43 may be configured to determine the score of the candidate maritime area for each maritime office according to the pre-constructed mapping relationship between the distance and the score and the distance of each maritime office from the candidate maritime area; accumulate the scores of the candidate maritime area for each maritime office to obtain a cumulative score; perform coefficient conversion on the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range to obtain a target coefficient; wherein the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range is positively correlated with the target coefficient; and determine the product of the cumulative score and the target coefficient as the third intermediate score.

[0085] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, when a scene includes multiple candidate offshore areas, the third scoring module 47 can also be used to determine candidate offshore areas whose site selection scores are greater than or equal to a scoring threshold to form a set of candidate offshore areas; determine a predetermined number of candidate offshore areas from the set of candidate offshore areas in descending order of the site selection scores; and obtain information related to each of the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas, summarize the information and display it.

[0086] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas includes the target offshore area. In this case, the third scoring module 47 can also be used to respond to the information retrieval operation for the target offshore area and display the summary information related to the target offshore area when the display interface displays the identification object of each candidate offshore area in the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas.

[0087] Since the functional modules of the site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project in the embodiment of the present disclosure are the same as those in the above-mentioned method implementation, they will not be described in detail here.

[0088] In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, on which a program product capable of implementing the above method of the present specification is stored. In some possible implementations, various aspects of the present disclosure may also be implemented in the form of a program product, which includes a program code, and when the program product is run on a terminal device, the program code is used to enable the terminal device to execute the steps according to various exemplary implementations of the present disclosure described in the above "Exemplary Method" section of the present specification.

[0089] The program product for implementing the above method according to the embodiment of the present disclosure can adopt a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM) and include program code, and can be run on a terminal device, such as a personal computer. However, the program product of the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and in this document, a readable storage medium can be any tangible medium containing or storing a program, which can be used by or in combination with an instruction execution system, an apparatus or a device.

[0090] The program product may adopt any combination of one or more readable media. The readable medium may be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. The readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples (non-exhaustive list) of readable storage media include: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical disk, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof.

[0091] Computer readable signal media may include data signals propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, in which readable program code is carried. Such propagated data signals may take a variety of forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination of the above. Readable signal media may also be any readable medium other than a readable storage medium, which may send, propagate, or transmit a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0092] The program code embodied on the readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wired, optical cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

[0093] Program code for performing the operations of the present disclosure may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, C++, etc., and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as "C" or similar programming languages. The program code may be executed entirely on the user computing device, partially on the user device, as a separate software package, partially on the user computing device and partially on a remote computing device, or entirely on a remote computing device or server. In the case of a remote computing device, the remote computing device may be connected to the user computing device through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computing device (e.g., using an Internet service provider to connect through the Internet).

[0094] In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, an electronic device capable of implementing the above method is also provided.

[0095] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various aspects of the present disclosure may be implemented as systems, methods or program products. Therefore, various aspects of the present disclosure may be specifically implemented in the following forms, namely: complete hardware implementation, complete software implementation (including firmware, microcode, etc.), or a combination of hardware and software, which may be collectively referred to herein as "circuits", "modules" or "systems".

[0096] Refer to the following Figure 5 The electronic device 500 according to this embodiment of the present disclosure is described. Figure 5 The electronic device 500 shown is merely an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0097] like Figure 5 As shown, the electronic device 500 is in the form of a general computing device. The components of the electronic device 500 may include but are not limited to: at least one processing unit 510, at least one storage unit 520, a bus 530 connecting different system components (including the storage unit 520 and the processing unit 510), and a display unit 540.

[0098] The storage unit stores program codes, which can be executed by the processing unit 510, so that the processing unit 510 executes the steps according to various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure described in the above “Exemplary Method” section of this specification. For example, the processing unit 510 can execute various steps of the site selection method for an offshore photovoltaic project according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0099] The storage unit 520 may include a readable medium in the form of a volatile storage unit, such as a random access storage unit (RAM) 5201 and / or a cache storage unit 5202 , and may further include a read-only storage unit (ROM) 5203 .

[0100] The storage unit 520 may also include a program / utility 5204 having a set (at least one) of program modules 5205, such program modules 5205 including but not limited to: an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, each of which or some combination may include an implementation of a network environment.

[0101] Bus 530 may represent one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory unit bus or memory unit controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, a processing unit, or a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.

[0102] The electronic device 500 may also communicate with one or more external devices 600 (e.g., keyboards, pointing devices, Bluetooth devices, etc.), may also communicate with one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 500, and / or communicate with any device that enables the electronic device 500 to communicate with one or more other computing devices (e.g., routers, modems, etc.). This communication may be performed through an input / output (I / O) interface 550. In addition, the electronic device 500 may also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), and / or public networks, such as the Internet) through a network adapter 560. As shown, the network adapter 560 communicates with other modules of the electronic device 500 through a bus 530. It should be understood that, although not shown in the figure, other hardware and / or software modules may be used in conjunction with the electronic device 500, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup storage systems, etc.

[0103] Through the description of the above implementation, it is easy for those skilled in the art to understand that the example implementation described here can be implemented by software, or by software combined with necessary hardware. Therefore, the technical solution according to the implementation of the present disclosure can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (which can be a CD-ROM, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, etc.) or on a network, and includes a number of instructions to enable a computing device (which can be a personal computer, a server, a terminal device, or a network device, etc.) to execute the method according to the implementation of the present disclosure.

[0104] In addition, the above-mentioned figures are only schematic illustrations of the processes included in the method according to the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, and are not intended to be limiting. It is easy to understand that the processes shown in the above-mentioned figures do not indicate or limit the time sequence of these processes. In addition, it is also easy to understand that these processes can be performed synchronously or asynchronously, for example, in multiple modules.

[0105] It should be noted that, although several modules or units of the device for action execution are mentioned in the above detailed description, this division is not mandatory. In fact, according to the embodiments of the present disclosure, the features and functions of two or more modules or units described above can be embodied in one module or unit. On the contrary, the features and functions of one module or unit described above can be further divided into multiple modules or units to be embodied.

[0106] Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate other embodiments of the present disclosure after considering the specification and practicing what is disclosed herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the present disclosure that follow the general principles of the present disclosure and include common knowledge or customary technical means in the art that are not disclosed in the present disclosure. The specification and embodiments are to be considered merely as exemplary, and the true scope and spirit of the present disclosure are indicated by the claims.

[0107] It should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the exact structures that have been described above and shown in the drawings, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for selecting a site for an offshore photovoltaic project, characterized in that: include: Acquire a first evaluation index set and a second evaluation index set, where the first evaluation index set and the second evaluation index set have an evaluation index intersection or the first evaluation index set includes the second evaluation index set; Using the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a first score; Performing a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set to obtain a second score; The site selection score of the candidate offshore area is determined according to the first score and the second score, and when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a score threshold, the candidate offshore area is determined to be suitable as a photovoltaic array installation area for an offshore photovoltaic project.

2. The site selection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The first evaluation index set includes natural environment indicators, man-made environment indicators, and safety assurance indicators; wherein, using the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation index set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a first score includes: Using the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a first intermediate score; Using the man-made environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a second intermediate score; Using the safety and security indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area to obtain a third intermediate score; The first intermediate score, the second intermediate score, and the third intermediate score are weighted to obtain a first score.

3. The site selection method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The navigation environment of the candidate offshore area is analyzed by using the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first intermediate score, including: Performing data standardization processing on each indicator data included in the natural environment indicators in the first evaluation indicator set, and combining each indicator data after the data standardization processing into an indicator vector; The indicator vector is input into a scoring model to obtain a first intermediate score.

4. The site selection method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The artificial environment indicators include one or more of port location information, aquaculture area location information, hydraulic structure location information, and ship traffic flow statistics information.

5. The site selection method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The safety and security indicators include the number of maritime offices within a predetermined range and the distances of each maritime office from the candidate maritime area; wherein the navigation environment of the candidate maritime area is analyzed using the safety and security indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a third intermediate score, including: Determine the score of each of the candidate maritime areas for each of the maritime offices according to the pre-constructed mapping relationship between the distance and the score and the distance between each of the maritime offices and the candidate maritime area; Accumulating the scores of the candidate maritime areas for the maritime offices to obtain an accumulated score; Performing coefficient conversion on the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range to obtain a target coefficient; wherein the number of maritime offices within the predetermined range is positively correlated with the target coefficient; The product of the accumulated score and the target coefficient is determined as a third intermediate score.

6. The site selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that: In the case where a plurality of candidate offshore areas are included in the scenario, the site selection method further includes: Determining candidate offshore areas having a site selection score greater than or equal to the score threshold to form a set of candidate offshore areas; Determining a predetermined number of candidate offshore areas from the set of candidate offshore areas in descending order of site selection scores; The information related to each of the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas is obtained respectively, and the information is summarized and displayed.

7. The site selection method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The predetermined number of candidate offshore areas includes the target offshore area; wherein the site selection method further includes: When the display interface displays the identification object of each candidate offshore area among the predetermined number of candidate offshore areas, in response to the information retrieval operation for the target offshore area, the summary information related to the target offshore area is displayed.

8. A site selection device for an offshore photovoltaic project, characterized in that: include: An indicator acquisition module, used to acquire a first evaluation indicator set and a second evaluation indicator set, where the first evaluation indicator set and the second evaluation indicator set have an evaluation indicator intersection or the first evaluation indicator set includes the second evaluation indicator set; A first scoring module, configured to analyze the navigation environment of the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the first evaluation indicator set to obtain a first score; A second scoring module, configured to perform a photovoltaic array area suitability analysis on the candidate offshore area using the evaluation indicators in the second evaluation indicator set to obtain a second score; The third scoring module is used to determine the site selection score of the candidate offshore area according to the first score and the second score, and determine that the candidate offshore area is suitable as a photovoltaic array construction area for an offshore photovoltaic project when the site selection score is greater than or equal to a scoring threshold.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the method for selecting a site for an offshore photovoltaic project according to any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: processor; as well as A memory, configured to store executable instructions of the processor; The processor is configured to implement the siting method for an offshore photovoltaic project according to any one of claims 1 to 7 by executing the executable instructions.

Images