A distribution network feasibility study control method, system, medium and equipment

Abstract

The present invention discloses a distribution network feasibility study control method, system, medium and equipment, including: wherein the method includes: subdividing the entire distribution network feasibility study process into multiple control units, wherein each control unit includes at least one control node, and the control node is determined according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study; and performing differentiated management on the distribution network feasibility study process according to each control node in the control unit. The distribution network feasibility study control method in the present invention, by subdividing the entire distribution network feasibility study process into multiple control units, and the control unit determines the control node according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then performing differentiated management according to the control node, is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems, and when performing "city-county-design" vertical management, the feasibility study management department can reduce the management level, conduct multi-level and multi-departmental intervention at the same time, more accurately locate the responsible unit, and improve the quality and efficiency of the distribution network feasibility study.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of distribution network control technology, and in particular to a distribution network feasibility study control method, system, medium and equipment. Background Art

[0002] As the investment scale and precise investment requirements of distribution networks continue to increase, problems such as low quality, slow progress, large workload, difficulty in quantitative management, and difficulty in resource allocation of current feasibility study projects have gradually become prominent, which is inconsistent with the requirements of high quality and high efficiency.

[0003] In recent years, various power grid companies have also made a series of positive explorations. In terms of digitalization, they have developed a review platform for the feasibility study review process, providing intelligent information-based review methods for project reviews to improve review quality and efficiency.

[0004] The traditional feasibility study management dimension only stays at the three-level vertical control of "city-county-design unit". Although various power grid companies have also developed project libraries, preliminary feasibility study approval and other systems, they are still unable to optimize and use process data for feasibility study project management. How to scientifically manage feasibility study projects to maximize investment benefits is becoming more and more prominent. The existing feasibility study management methods are all refinements of a single process, such as the development review platform, feasibility study template optimization, feasibility study review management research, etc. There is no systematic management method for the entire feasibility study process. Summary of the invention

[0005] The present invention provides a distribution network feasibility study control method, system, medium and equipment, which are used to solve the problems in the prior art that the investment benefits achieved by feasibility study control are low and systematic control of the whole process cannot be achieved.

[0006] In view of this, the first aspect of the present application provides a distribution network feasibility study management and control method, the method comprising:

[0007] The whole process of feasibility study of distribution network is subdivided into multiple control units, wherein each control unit includes at least one control node, and the control node is determined according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of feasibility study;

[0008] Determine the warning threshold of each of the control nodes, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each of the control nodes with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the severity of the threshold warning of the control node;

[0009] Extracting key nodes from the control nodes according to the severity of the threshold warning;

[0010] The distribution network feasibility study process is managed and controlled differently according to the key nodes.

[0011] Optionally, the control unit includes: an internal audit control unit, a review control unit, and a process control unit.

[0012] Optionally, the control nodes of the internal audit control unit include: scheme and feasibility confirmation, feasibility study preparation efficiency, internal audit, and reporting review efficiency;

[0013] The control nodes of the review control unit include: review efficiency, scheme modification results, quality modification results, necessary material conditions, modification feedback efficiency, and review times;

[0014] The control nodes of the process control unit include: system process operation efficiency.

[0015] Optionally, when the control unit is the internal audit control unit, the differentiated control of the distribution network feasibility study process according to the key nodes includes:

[0016] Determine the severity of the early warning of the key node according to the planned management time and management efficiency of the distribution network project at the key node;

[0017] According to the severity of the warning of the key node, the responsible unit corresponding to the key node is reminded of the node problem type or intervention control is performed.

[0018] Optionally, when the key node is: the review efficiency or the modification feedback efficiency, the differentiated management and control of the distribution network feasibility study process according to the key node includes:

[0019] According to the preset task planning time and efficiency KPI, the completion time of each task in the key nodes is predicted, and a horizontal unit efficiency comparison analysis is conducted on the management units at all levels in the key nodes to determine the responsible units and influencing factors that affect the review efficiency or modification feedback efficiency.

[0020] Optionally, each control node of the process control unit performs differentiated control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network, including:

[0021] Determine the operation efficiency of the distribution network project according to the system time consumption of the distribution network project;

[0022] According to the operating efficiency of the distribution network project, the overall progress warning control of different responsible units is carried out to determine the flow factors affecting the flow of distribution network projects.

[0023] A second aspect of the present application provides a distribution network feasibility study management and control system, the system comprising:

[0024] A division unit, used to subdivide the entire distribution network feasibility study process into a plurality of control units, wherein each of the control units includes at least one control node;

[0025] A comparison unit, used to determine the warning threshold of each of the control nodes, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each of the control nodes with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the threshold warning severity of the control node;

[0026] An extraction unit, configured to extract key nodes from the control nodes according to the threshold warning severity;

[0027] A management and control unit is used to perform differentiated management and control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network according to the key nodes.

[0028] Optionally, the control unit includes: an internal audit control unit, a review control unit, and a process control unit; wherein:

[0029] The control nodes of the internal audit control unit include: scheme and feasibility confirmation, feasibility study preparation efficiency, internal audit, and reporting and review efficiency;

[0030] The control nodes of the review control unit include: review efficiency, scheme modification results, quality modification results, necessary material conditions, modification feedback efficiency, and review times;

[0031] The control nodes of the process control unit include: system process operation efficiency.

[0032] A third aspect of the present invention provides a distribution network feasibility study management and control device, the device comprising a processor and a memory:

[0033] The memory is used to store program code and transmit the program code to the processor;

[0034] The processor is used to execute the steps of the distribution network feasibility study management and control method as described in the first aspect according to the instructions in the program code.

[0035] A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium is used to store program code, and the program code is used to execute the distribution network feasibility study management and control method described in the first aspect above.

[0036] It can be seen from the above technical solutions that the present invention has the following advantages:

[0037] The distribution network feasibility study control method of the present invention divides the entire distribution network feasibility study process into multiple control units, and the control units determine the control nodes according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then perform differentiated management according to the control nodes, which is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems. In addition, when conducting vertical management of "prefecture-level city-county-design", the feasibility study management department can reduce the management levels, conduct simultaneous intervention of multiple levels and departments, locate the responsible units more accurately, and improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0038] The distribution network feasibility study control system, equipment and storage medium in the present invention have all the beneficial effects of the above-mentioned distribution network feasibility study control method, which will not be repeated here. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative labor.

[0040] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a distribution network feasibility study control method provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the relationship between various control units and control nodes in the distribution network feasibility study control method provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of a distribution network feasibility study management and control system provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] In order to make the purpose, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the embodiments described below are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0044] See also Figure 1 , a distribution network feasibility study management and control method provided in an embodiment of the present invention includes:

[0045] Step 101: subdivide the entire process of the feasibility study of the distribution network into multiple management and control units, wherein each management and control unit includes at least one management and control node, and the management and control node is determined according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study.

[0046] Step 102: determine the warning threshold of each control node, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each control node with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the threshold warning severity of the control node.

[0047] Step 103: extract key nodes from the control nodes according to the severity of the threshold warning.

[0048] Step 104: Carry out differentiated management and control of the distribution network feasibility study process according to key nodes.

[0049] In one embodiment, in step 101, the feasibility study of the distribution network is carried out in chronological order, combined with Figure 2 As shown, it usually includes the following steps: 1) The feasibility study management department issues project details; 2) The county bureau organizes the design unit to conduct survey and design; 3) The design unit prepares the feasibility study; 4) The county bureau conducts internal review; 5) The design unit modifies the feasibility study; 6) The county bureau reviews and reports; 7) The review unit reviews and forwards opinions; 8) The county bureau modifies the plan; 9) The design unit modifies the quality issues; 10) The county bureau supplements the materials and reports for review; 11) The approved project is pushed to the feasibility study management department; 12) The system process is running; 13) The feasibility study approval is completed.

[0050] Furthermore, combined with Figure 2 As shown, the control unit includes internal audit control unit, review control unit and process control unit. Among them, the internal audit control unit mainly corresponds to the feasibility study steps of the distribution network led by the county bureau, the review control unit mainly corresponds to the feasibility study steps of the distribution network led by the review unit, and the process control unit mainly corresponds to the feasibility study steps of the distribution network led by the municipal bureau.

[0051] Furthermore, the control nodes of the internal audit control unit include plan and feasibility confirmation, feasibility study preparation efficiency, internal audit, and reporting review efficiency; the control nodes of the review control unit include review efficiency, plan modification results, quality modification results, necessary material status, modification feedback efficiency, and number of reviews; the control nodes of the process control unit include system process operation efficiency.

[0052] In the internal audit control link, the scheme in the scheme and feasibility confirmation refers to the project scheme to achieve the project effect, such as the scheme involving the construction or transformation of power lines and equipment. Feasibility confirmation refers to obtaining the support of the right-holding unit during the project feasibility study stage, as well as the confirmation of the technical feasibility of the scheme. The efficiency of preparing feasibility studies refers to the efficiency of the winning design unit in completing the project feasibility study report. Internal audit refers to the internal audit of the project feasibility study report submitted by the winning design unit to the various professional departments involved in the power grid company after the winning design unit completes the project feasibility study report. The efficiency of reporting and review refers to the efficiency of the power grid company collecting all the relevant materials and reporting them to the superior review agency for review after the internal audit. Specifically, after the winning design unit receives the project arranged by the power grid company to carry out a feasibility study, it conducts on-site investigation and prepares a feasibility study report. After obtaining the preliminary plan, it simultaneously conducts consultation with the project right-holding unit, and finally forms a feasibility study report that can be internally audited by the power grid company and submits it to the power grid company for internal audit. The power grid company then organizes relevant departments to conduct internal audits. After multiple revisions, the power grid company collects all the materials required by the relevant superiors and submits them to the review agency established by the superior for review, and then it comes to the review control link.

[0053] In the review and control link, review efficiency refers to the number of projects reviewed by the review organization every day. The result of the scheme modification refers to whether the opinions given by the review organization on the project scheme have been fully modified as required. The result of the quality modification refers to whether the opinions given by the review organization on the project description issues, data consistency issues, cost issues, etc. have been fully modified as required. The necessary material situation refers to whether the materials that the review organization should provide for the project are provided in quality and quantity, and whether the materials meet the depth requirements of the project feasibility study. The modification feedback efficiency refers to the time it takes for the power grid company to modify and feedback to the review organization after the review organization issues the review opinions to the power grid company. The number of reviews refers to the number of times the review organization reviews each project. Specifically, the review organization reviews the projects reported by the power grid company and forwards the opinions back to the reporting unit. The reporting unit organizes the winning design unit to modify the review opinions and the power grid company sends them to the review organization for re-review until they pass the review.

[0054] In the process control link, the system process operation efficiency refers to the efficiency of completing the feasibility study approval of each project on the system developed by the power grid company from planning the project library to completing the project feasibility study approval according to the relevant internal system requirements of the power grid company. Since the power grid company has its own developed system, such as the power grid management platform, etc., after each project is approved by the review agency, the power grid company fills in the relevant information of each approved project according to the relevant system requirements and circulates it in the system as required. The system will record the personnel to be approved for each project and the time of each link in the system approval process. According to the approval time requirements of each link of the power grid company, the operation efficiency is determined by the time consumption of each project system.

[0055] In one embodiment, in step 102, the warning threshold may be set according to historical data or empirical data, and the severity of the threshold warning may be determined according to the extent to which the length of the stay time exceeds the warning threshold.

[0056] In one embodiment, in step 103, generally speaking, the control node with the highest threshold warning severity is extracted as the key node.

[0057] In one embodiment, in step 104, differentiated management is performed for the control nodes with the greatest threshold warning severity, i.e., the key nodes, including macro-control and individual control. Macro-control can propose solutions to the key nodes of multiple projects of each unit, thereby speeding up the task progress, while individual control proposes solutions based on the key nodes of a single project, ultimately speeding up the task progress.

[0058] Furthermore, in one embodiment, when the control unit is an internal audit control unit, in step 104, the feasibility study process of the distribution network is differentiatedly controlled according to key nodes, including:

[0059] Determine the severity of early warnings at key nodes based on the planned management time and management efficiency of distribution network projects at key nodes;

[0060] It should be noted that the severity of the warning of the key node is determined by the planned management time and management efficiency of the key node. For example, when the planned management time is long and the management efficiency is low, it can be determined that the severity of the warning of the key node is large.

[0061] According to the severity of the warning of the key node, the responsible unit corresponding to the key node will be reminded of the node problem type or intervene and control.

[0062] It should be noted that based on the severity of the warning at the key nodes, the responsible units will be reminded or intervened in the control. For example, when the severity of the warning is high, intervention control can be carried out directly. When the severity of the warning is low, only reminders of the contact problem type may be made.

[0063] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the key nodes are: when reviewing efficiency or modifying feedback efficiency, the feasibility study process of the distribution network is managed and controlled in a differentiated manner according to the key nodes, including:

[0064] Based on the preset task planning time and efficiency KPI, the completion time of each task in the key nodes is predicted, and a horizontal unit efficiency comparison analysis is conducted on the management units at all levels in the key nodes to determine the responsible units and influencing factors that affect the review efficiency or modification feedback efficiency.

[0065] It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the task planning time and efficiency KPI are referenced to predict the completion time of each task in the key nodes, and a comparative analysis is performed on the management units at all levels designed in the key nodes to determine the responsible units and influencing factors that affect the review efficiency or modification feedback efficiency. This can accurately locate the responsible units, analyze the causes of the problems, and conduct through-the-scene management when necessary (i.e., reduce the management levels for direct management), which can improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0066] Furthermore, in one embodiment, each control node of the process control unit performs differentiated control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network, including:

[0067] Determine the operation efficiency of the distribution network project based on the system time consumption of the distribution network project;

[0068] According to the operating efficiency of the distribution network project, the overall progress warning control of different responsible units is carried out to determine the flow factors affecting the flow of distribution network projects.

[0069] It should be noted that in the systems of various power grid companies, the personnel awaiting approval for each project and the time for each link in the system approval process will be recorded, so as to obtain the system time consumption and then determine the operating efficiency of the distribution network project; based on the operating efficiency, the overall progress of different responsible units can be early warned and controlled, and the factors affecting the flow of distribution network projects can be determined.

[0070] The distribution network feasibility study control method of the present invention divides the entire distribution network feasibility study process into multiple control units, and the control units determine the control nodes according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then perform differentiated management according to the control nodes, which is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems. In addition, when conducting vertical management of "prefecture-level city-county-design", the feasibility study management department can reduce the management levels, conduct simultaneous intervention of multiple levels and departments, locate the responsible units more accurately, and improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0071] The above is a distribution network feasibility study management and control method provided in an embodiment of the present invention, and the following is a distribution network feasibility study management and control system provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0072] See also Figure 3 , a distribution network feasibility study management and control system provided in an embodiment of the present invention includes:

[0073] The division unit 201 is used to divide the entire process of the distribution network feasibility study into multiple management and control units, wherein each management and control unit includes at least one management and control node, and the management and control node is determined according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study.

[0074] The comparison unit 202 is used to determine the warning threshold of each control node, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each control node with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the threshold warning severity of the control node.

[0075] The extraction unit 203 is used to extract key nodes from the control nodes according to the threshold warning severity.

[0076] The control unit 204 is used to perform differentiated control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network according to key nodes.

[0077] The distribution network feasibility study control system in the present invention divides the entire distribution network feasibility study process into multiple control units, and the control units determine the control nodes according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then perform differentiated management according to the control nodes, which is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems. In addition, when conducting vertical management of "prefecture-level city-county-design", the feasibility study management department can reduce the management levels, conduct simultaneous intervention of multiple levels and departments, locate the responsible units more accurately, and improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0078] Furthermore, an embodiment of the present invention also provides a distribution network feasibility study management and control device, the device comprising a processor and a memory:

[0079] The memory is used to store program code and transmit the program code to the processor;

[0080] The processor is used to execute the steps of the distribution network feasibility study management and control method as described in the above method embodiment according to the instructions in the program code.

[0081] In the device of the present invention, when the computer program in its memory is executed by the processor, the whole process of feasibility study of the distribution network is subdivided into multiple control units, and the control units determine the control nodes according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then differentiated management is performed according to the control nodes, which is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems. In addition, when conducting vertical management of "prefecture-city-county-design", the feasibility study management department can reduce the management levels, conduct simultaneous intervention of multiple levels and departments, locate the responsible units more accurately, and improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0082] Furthermore, a computer-readable storage medium is provided in an embodiment of the present invention, and the computer-readable storage medium is used to store program code, and the program code is used to execute the distribution network feasibility study management and control method described in the above method embodiment.

[0083] When the computer program of the storage medium in the present invention is executed by the processor, the whole process of the feasibility study of the distribution network is subdivided into multiple control units, and the control units determine the control nodes according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study, and then differentiated management is performed according to the control nodes, which is conducive to early warning of control nodes with problems. In addition, when conducting vertical management of "prefecture-city-county-design", the feasibility study management department can reduce the management levels, conduct simultaneous intervention of multiple levels and departments, locate the responsible units more accurately, and improve the quality and efficiency of the feasibility study of the distribution network.

[0084] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the systems, devices and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0085] In the several embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic, for example, the division of units is only a logical function division, and there may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0086] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0087] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0088] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods of each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk, etc. Various media that can store program codes.

[0089] The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit the same. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments may still be modified, or some of the technical features may be replaced by equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A distribution network feasibility study management and control method, characterized in that: include: The whole process of feasibility study of distribution network is subdivided into multiple control units, wherein each control unit includes at least one control node, and the control node is determined according to the factors affecting the quality and efficiency of feasibility study; Determine the warning threshold of each of the control nodes, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each of the control nodes with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the severity of the threshold warning of the control node; Extracting key nodes from the control nodes according to the severity of the threshold warning; The distribution network feasibility study process is managed and controlled differently according to the key nodes.

2. The distribution network feasibility study management and control method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The control units include: internal audit control unit, review control unit, and process control unit.

3. The distribution network feasibility study management and control method according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The control nodes of the internal audit control unit include: scheme and feasibility confirmation, feasibility study preparation efficiency, internal audit, and reporting and review efficiency; The control nodes of the review control unit include: review efficiency, scheme modification results, quality modification results, necessary material conditions, modification feedback efficiency, and review times; The control nodes of the process control unit include: system process operation efficiency.

4. The distribution network feasibility study management and control method according to claim 2 is characterized in that: When the control unit is the internal audit control unit, the differentiated control of the feasibility study process of the distribution network according to the key nodes includes: Determine the severity of the early warning of the key node according to the planned management time and management efficiency of the distribution network project at the key node; According to the severity of the warning of the key node, the responsible unit corresponding to the key node is reminded of the node problem type or intervention control is performed.

5. The distribution network feasibility study management and control method according to claim 3 is characterized in that: When the key node is: the review efficiency or the modification feedback efficiency, the differentiated management and control of the distribution network feasibility study process according to the key node includes: According to the preset task planning time and efficiency KPI, the completion time of each task in the key nodes is predicted, and a horizontal unit efficiency comparison analysis is conducted on the management units at all levels in the key nodes to determine the responsible units and influencing factors that affect the review efficiency or modification feedback efficiency.

6. The distribution network feasibility study management and control method according to claim 2 is characterized in that: Each control node of the process control unit performs differentiated control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network, including: Determine the operation efficiency of the distribution network project according to the system time consumption of the distribution network project; According to the operating efficiency of the distribution network project, the overall progress warning control of different responsible units is carried out to determine the flow factors affecting the flow of distribution network projects.

7. A distribution network feasibility study management and control system, characterized in that: include: A division unit, used to subdivide the entire distribution network feasibility study process into a plurality of control units, wherein each of the control units includes at least one control node; A comparison unit, used to determine the warning threshold of each of the control nodes, compare the length of time the distribution network project stays at each of the control nodes with the warning threshold of the corresponding control node, and determine the threshold warning severity of the control node; An extraction unit, configured to extract key nodes from the control nodes according to the threshold warning severity; A management and control unit is used to perform differentiated management and control on the feasibility study process of the distribution network according to the key nodes.

8. The distribution network feasibility study management and control system according to claim 7 is characterized in that: The control units include: internal audit control unit, review control unit, and process control unit; among which: The control nodes of the internal audit control unit include: scheme and feasibility confirmation, feasibility study preparation efficiency, internal audit, and reporting and review efficiency; The control nodes of the review control unit include: review efficiency, scheme modification results, quality modification results, necessary material conditions, modification feedback efficiency, and review times; The control nodes of the process control unit include: system process operation efficiency.

9. A distribution network feasibility study control device, characterized in that: The device comprises a processor and a memory: The memory is used to store program code and transmit the program code to the processor; The processor is used to execute the distribution network feasibility study management and control method described in any one of claims 1-6 according to the instructions in the program code.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium is used to store program code, and the program code is used to execute the distribution network feasibility study management and control method described in any one of claims 1-6.

Images