Method and system for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency devices in frequency agility state, electronic device and storage medium

By calculating the spectrum compatibility between the agile frequency conversion device and the fixed frequency equipment, the problem of difficulty in effectively calculating spectrum compatibility in the prior art is solved, and a clear analysis of the spectrum compatibility status of the agile frequency conversion device is realized.

CN119814075AActive Publication Date: 2025-04-11CHINA SHIP DEV & DESIGN CENT
View PDF 3 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202411697268.5
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-11-26
Publication Date
2025-04-11
Estimated Expiration
2044-11-26

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

It is difficult for the prior art to effectively calculate the spectrum compatibility status between agile frequency conversion equipment and agile frequency conversion equipment and agile frequency conversion equipment.

Method used

By calculating the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, and calculating the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives, combining the results of the two to judge the spectrum compatibility, and traversing the frequency hopping frequency set of the device, counting the number of spectrum incompatibility to judge the spectrum conflict.

Benefits of technology

Clarify the spectrum compatibility status between agile frequency conversion equipment and fixed frequency equipment and agile frequency conversion equipment, and provide effective technical means for the spectrum compatibility analysis of agile frequency conversion equipment.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN119814075A_ABST
    Figure CN119814075A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention provides a frequency spectrum compatibility calculation method and system between frequency devices in a frequency agility state, an electronic device and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: when a first device is in a working frequency combination of a first working frequency and a second device is in a second working frequency, calculating spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits / receives and the second device receives / transmits; if the two spectrum compatibility results are both compatible, the first device at the first working frequency and the second device at the second working frequency are spectrum compatible; repeating the steps to obtain a spectrum compatibility result of all working frequency combinations; and if the ratio of the number of the incompatible frequency spectrums of all the working frequency combinations to the number of all the working frequency combinations is greater than a predefined frequency spectrum conflict probability threshold between the frequency hopping devices, determining that the frequency spectrums of the first device and the second device conflict. According to the scheme provided by the invention, the frequency spectrum compatibility state between the frequency agility equipment and the fixed frequency equipment and between the frequency agility equipment can be determined.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of electromagnetic interference analysis and calculation technology, and in particular relates to a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state. Background Art

[0002] The electromagnetic interference status between frequency-using devices affects whether the frequency-using devices can work normally at the same time. For frequency-using devices working at fixed frequency, the electromagnetic interference equation can be used for calculation. The spectrum of agile frequency devices changes rapidly, and there is no good calculation method to determine the spectrum compatibility status between agile frequency devices and fixed frequency devices, and between agile frequency devices.

[0003] Therefore, how to provide a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state has become a technical problem that urgently needs to be solved in this field. Summary of the invention

[0004] The object of the present invention is to provide a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state.

[0005] According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a spectrum compatibility calculation between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state, comprising:

[0006] Step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated to obtain a first spectrum compatibility result;

[0007] Step S2: When the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives is calculated to obtain a second spectrum compatibility result;

[0008] Step S3: If the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible;

[0009] Step S4, traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations;

[0010] Step S5, counting the number of all operating frequency combinations; counting the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0011] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated, and obtaining the first spectrum compatibility result includes:

[0012] When the first device transmits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device;

[0013] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device;

[0014] Calculate a first interference power at a receiving frequency according to a radiation power density at the second device and an effective receiving area of ​​a receiving antenna of the second device;

[0015] Calculating a second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0016] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0017] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, when the first device transmits, calculating the radiation power density at the second device includes:

[0018]

[0019] Among them, P A is the transmission power of the first device; G A is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0020] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0021]

[0022] Among them, B r G is the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; B is the receiving antenna gain of the second device; r is the wavelength received by the second device; c is the speed of light; f B is the second operating frequency.

[0023] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency according to the radiation power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0024] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiation power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

[0025] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0026] The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

[0027] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S5, a typical value of the predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices is 30%.

[0028] A second aspect of the present invention discloses a system for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state; the system comprises:

[0029] The first processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives when the first device is at a first operating frequency and the second device is at a second operating frequency, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result;

[0030] The second processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives when the first device is at the first operating frequency and the second device is at the second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result;

[0031] The third processing module is configured to, if the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible;

[0032] A fourth processing module is configured to traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations;

[0033] The fifth processing module is configured to count the number of all working frequency combinations; count the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations to the number of all working frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0034] The third aspect of the present invention discloses an electronic device. The electronic device includes a memory and a processor, the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the steps in the method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state in any one of the first aspects of the present disclosure are implemented.

[0035] The fourth aspect of the present invention discloses a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps in any one of the methods for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state in the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0036] The beneficial effects brought by the present invention are as follows:

[0037] It can be seen from the above scheme that the embodiments of the present invention provide a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in the agile frequency state, which has the following beneficial effects: the spectrum compatibility status between the agile frequency device and the fixed frequency device and between the agile frequency devices can be clarified, providing an effective technical means for the spectrum compatibility analysis of the agile frequency devices. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0038] Figure 1 A flowchart of a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state provided according to an embodiment;

[0039] Figure 2 is a structural diagram of a system for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0040] Figure 3 The figure is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0041] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present invention clearer, the technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiment of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiment is a part of the embodiment of the present invention, not all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0042] Embodiment 1:

[0043] According to a first aspect of the present invention, the present invention discloses a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state. Figure 1 FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0044] Step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated to obtain a first spectrum compatibility result;

[0045] Step S2: When the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives is calculated to obtain a second spectrum compatibility result;

[0046] Step S3: If the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible;

[0047] Step S4, traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations;

[0048] Step S5, counting the number of all operating frequency combinations; counting the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0049] In step S1, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated to obtain a first spectrum compatibility result.

[0050] In some embodiments, in step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, calculating the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, obtaining the first spectrum compatibility result includes:

[0051] When the first device transmits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device;

[0052] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device;

[0053] Calculate a first interference power at a receiving frequency according to a radiation power density at the second device and an effective receiving area of ​​a receiving antenna of the second device;

[0054] Calculating a second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0055] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0056] When the first device transmits, calculating the radiation power density at the second device includes:

[0057]

[0058] Among them, P A is the transmission power of the first device; G A is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0059] Calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0060]

[0061] Among them, B r G is the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; B is the receiving antenna gain of the second device; r is the wavelength received by the second device; c is the speed of light; f B is the second operating frequency.

[0062] The calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency according to the radiation power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0063] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiation power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device, that is,

[0064]

[0065] The calculating the second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0066] The first interference power is divided by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency to obtain the second interference power, that is,

[0067]

[0068] Specifically, the main parameters of the first device and the second device are as follows: the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device is [A1, A2, ..., A m ], there are m frequency points in total, and the transmission power of the first device is P A , the antenna gain of the first device is G A , the sensitivity level of the first device is S A; The frequency hopping frequency set of the second device is [B1, B2, ..., B n ], there are n frequency points in total, and the transmission power of the second device is P B , the antenna gain of the second device is G B , the sensitivity level of the second device is S B ; The distance between the first device and the second device is R.

[0069] In step S2, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives is calculated to obtain a second spectrum compatibility result.

[0070] Specifically, the radiation power density S at the first device when the second device transmits is calculated as:

[0071]

[0072] Among them, P B is the transmission power of the second device, G B is the antenna gain of the second device in the direction of the first device. The interference power P received by the antenna of the sensitive device r for

[0073] P B =S·A r A r is the effective receiving area of ​​the first device receiving antenna, which can be expressed as

[0074]

[0075] λ r The first device receives the wavelength, G A is the receiving antenna gain of the first device, where λ r Expressed as

[0076]

[0077] c is the speed of light; thus, the relationship between interference power and transmitter power can be expressed as

[0078]

[0079] The second device generates a signal at a frequency f B Transmitting frequency f A The sideband suppression is L, then the interference power at the receiving frequency is

[0080]

[0081] The sensitivity level of the first device is S A If P r >SA , then the first device uses f A Receive, the second device with f B When transmitting, the two spectra are incompatible or conflicting; otherwise, the spectra are compatible.

[0082] In step S3, if the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible.

[0083] Specifically, if the first device or the second device only transmits or only receives, the spectrum compatibility result is a single working condition calculation result.

[0084] In step S5, the number of all operating frequency combinations is counted; the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations is counted; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the spectrum of the first device conflicts with the second device.

[0085] In some embodiments, a typical value of the predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices is 30%.

[0086] In summary, the solution proposed in the present invention can clarify the spectrum compatibility status between the agile frequency device and the fixed frequency device and between the agile frequency devices, and provide an effective technical means for spectrum compatibility analysis of the agile frequency devices.

[0087] Embodiment 2:

[0088] The invention discloses a spectrum compatibility calculation system between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state. Figure 2 FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of a system for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 As shown, the system 100 includes:

[0089] The first processing module 101 is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result;

[0090] The second processing module 102 is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result;

[0091] The third processing module 103 is configured to, if the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible;

[0092] The fourth processing module 104 is configured to traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations;

[0093] The fifth processing module 105 is configured to count the number of all working frequency combinations; count the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations to the number of all working frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0094] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the first processing module 101 is specifically configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, and obtaining the first spectrum compatibility result includes:

[0095] When the first device transmits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device;

[0096] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device;

[0097] Calculate a first interference power at a receiving frequency according to a radiation power density at the second device and an effective receiving area of ​​a receiving antenna of the second device;

[0098] Calculating a second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0099] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0100] When the first device transmits, calculating the radiation power density at the second device includes:

[0101]

[0102] Among them, P A is the transmission power of the first device; G A is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0103] Calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0104]

[0105] Among them, B r G is the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; B is the receiving antenna gain of the second device; r is the wavelength received by the second device; c is the speed of light; f B is the second operating frequency.

[0106] The calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency according to the radiation power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0107] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiation power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device, that is,

[0108]

[0109] The calculating the second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0110] The first interference power is divided by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency to obtain the second interference power, that is,

[0111]

[0112] Specifically, the main parameters of the first device and the second device are as follows: the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device is [A1, A2, ..., A m ], there are m frequency points in total, and the transmission power of the first device is P A , the antenna gain of the first device is G A , the sensitivity level of the first device is S A ; The frequency hopping frequency set of the second device is [B1, B2, ..., B n ], there are n frequency points in total, and the transmission power of the second device is P B , the antenna gain of the second device is G B , the sensitivity level of the second device is S B ; The distance between the first device and the second device is R.

[0113] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the second processing module 102 is specifically configured to calculate the radiation power density S at the first device when the second device transmits:

[0114]

[0115] Among them, P Bis the transmission power of the second device, G B is the antenna gain of the second device in the direction of the first device. The interference power P received by the antenna of the sensitive device r for

[0116] P B =S·A r

[0117] A r is the effective receiving area of ​​the first device receiving antenna, which can be expressed as

[0118]

[0119] λ r The first device receives the wavelength, G A is the receiving antenna gain of the first device, where λ r Expressed as

[0120]

[0121] c is the speed of light; thus, the relationship between interference power and transmitter power can be expressed as

[0122]

[0123] The second device generates a signal at a frequency f B Transmitting frequency f A The sideband suppression is L, then the interference power at the receiving frequency is

[0124]

[0125] The sensitivity level of the first device is S A If P r >S A , then the first device uses f A Receive, the second device with f B When transmitting, the two spectra are incompatible or conflicting; otherwise, the spectra are compatible.

[0126] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the third processing module 103 is specifically configured such that if the first device or the second device only transmits or only receives, the spectrum compatibility result is a single working condition calculation result.

[0127] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the fifth processing module 105 is specifically configured such that a typical value of the predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices is 30%.

[0128] Embodiment 3:

[0129] The present application discloses an electronic device, which includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the steps in the method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state in any one of the embodiments 1 disclosed in the present invention are implemented.

[0130] Figure 3 is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device includes a processor, a memory, a communication interface, a display screen and an input device connected via a system bus. Among them, the processor of the electronic device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the electronic device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The communication interface of the electronic device is used to communicate with an external terminal in a wired or wireless manner, and the wireless manner can be achieved through WIFI, an operator network, near field communication (NFC) or other technologies. The display screen of the electronic device can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the electronic device can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, or a button, a trackball or a touch pad set on the housing of the electronic device, or an external keyboard, touch pad or mouse, etc.

[0131] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The structure shown in the figure is only a structural diagram of the part related to the technical solution of the present disclosure, and does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device to which the technical solution of the present application is applied. The specific electronic device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0132] Embodiment 4:

[0133] The present invention discloses a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state in any one of the first embodiments of the present invention.

[0134] Please note that the technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. In order to make the description concise, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification. The above embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present application, and their descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the invention patent. It should be pointed out that for ordinary technicians in this field, without departing from the concept of the present application, several variations and improvements can be made, which all belong to the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the patent in this application shall be based on the attached claims.

[0135] The embodiments of the subject matter and functional operations described in this specification may be implemented in the following: digital electronic circuits, tangibly embodied computer software or firmware, computer hardware including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or a combination of one or more of them. The embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification may be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules in computer program instructions encoded on a tangible non-temporary program carrier to be executed by a data processing device or to control the operation of the data processing device. Alternatively or additionally, the program instructions may be encoded on an artificially generated propagation signal, such as a machine-generated electrical, optical or electromagnetic signal, which is generated to encode information and transmit it to a suitable receiver device for execution by a data processing device. The computer storage medium may be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory device, or a combination of one or more of them.

[0136] The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable computers executing one or more computer programs to perform corresponding functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by special purpose logic circuits, such as FPGAs (field programmable gate arrays) or ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits), and the apparatus can also be implemented as special purpose logic circuits.

[0137] Computers suitable for executing computer programs include, for example, general and / or special microprocessors, or any other type of central processing unit. Typically, the central processing unit will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and / or a random access memory. The basic components of a computer include a central processing unit for implementing or executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Typically, the computer will also include one or more large-capacity storage devices for storing data, such as magnetic disks, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks, or the computer will be operably coupled to this large-capacity storage device to receive data from it or to transmit data to it, or both. However, the computer does not necessarily have such a device. In addition, the computer can be embedded in another device, such as a mobile phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device such as a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, to name a few.

[0138] Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including, for example, semiconductor memory devices (e.g., EPROM, EEPROM and flash memory devices), magnetic disks (e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks), magneto-optical disks, and CD ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and memory may be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

[0139] Although this specification includes many specific implementation details, these should not be interpreted as limiting the scope of any invention or the scope of protection claimed, but are mainly used to describe the features of the specific embodiments of specific inventions. Certain features described in multiple embodiments in this specification may also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. On the other hand, the various features described in a single embodiment may also be implemented separately in multiple embodiments or in any suitable sub-combination. In addition, although features may work in certain combinations as described above and even initially claim protection, one or more features from the claimed combination may be removed from the combination in some cases, and the claimed combination may point to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination.

[0140] Similarly, although operations are depicted in a particular order in the accompanying drawings, this should not be understood as requiring that these operations be performed in the particular order shown or performed sequentially, or requiring that all illustrated operations be performed to achieve the desired results. In some cases, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. In addition, the separation of various system modules and components in the above-described embodiments should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product, or packaged into multiple software products.

[0141] Thus, specific embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve the desired results. In addition, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the particular order or sequential order shown to achieve the desired results. In some implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.

[0142] The above are preferred embodiments of the present invention. It should be pointed out that, for ordinary technicians in this technical field, several improvements and modifications can be made without departing from the principles of the present invention. These improvements and modifications should also be regarded as within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state, characterized in that: include: Step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated to obtain a first spectrum compatibility result; Step S2: When the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives is calculated to obtain a second spectrum compatibility result; Step S3: If the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible; Step S4, traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations; Step S5, counting the number of all operating frequency combinations; counting the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

2. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S1, when the first device is at a first working frequency and the second device is at a second working frequency, the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives is calculated, and the first spectrum compatibility result is obtained, including: When the first device transmits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device; Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; Calculate a first interference power at a receiving frequency according to a radiation power density at the second device and an effective receiving area of ​​a receiving antenna of the second device; Calculating a second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency; If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

3. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 2, characterized in that: In the step S1, when the first device transmits, calculating the radiation power density at the second device includes: Among them, P A is the transmission power of the first device; G A is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

4. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 2, characterized in that: In the step S1, calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes: Among them, B r G is the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; B is the receiving antenna gain of the second device; r is the wavelength received by the second device; c is the speed of light; f B is the second operating frequency.

5. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 2, characterized in that: In step S1, calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency according to the radiation power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes: The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiation power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

6. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 2, characterized in that: In the step S1, calculating the second interference power according to the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes: The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

7. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state according to claim 1, characterized in that: In the step S5, a typical value of the predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices is 30%.

8. A spectrum compatibility calculation system between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state, characterized in that: The system comprises: The first processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives when the first device is at a first operating frequency and the second device is at a second operating frequency, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result; The second processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives when the first device is at the first operating frequency and the second device is at the second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result; The third processing module is configured to, if the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are both compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, the spectrums are incompatible; A fourth processing module is configured to traverse the operating frequency combinations of the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations; The fifth processing module is configured to count the number of all working frequency combinations; count the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of spectrum incompatibilities of all working frequency combinations to the number of all working frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device includes a memory and a processor, the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state described in any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the steps of the method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices in a frequency agile state described in any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • System electromagnetic compatibility analysis method, device and equipment and storage medium

    CN117761433A

  • Frequency band compatible circuit and terminal

    CN212727022U

  • Carrier aggregation circuit implementation method and implementation system, and mobile terminal

    WO2017166353A1