Conflict checking method and system based on time axis

Abstract

The invention discloses a conflict checking method and system based on a time axis, and relates to the technical field of nuclear power plant work management, and the method comprises the steps: building a first object according to a first device; establishing an association relationship between the first equipment and different first objects based on the time axis; calculating a first object corresponding to the first equipment, and outputting a conflict result; and adjusting the first object according to the conflict result. According to the method, the work order task preparation information, the overhaul plan scheduling information and the isolation safety measure information are collected and integrated in the overhaul period, the equipment state conflict, the label type conflict and the isolation boundary and work object conflict are recognized in advance, the risk caused by mistaken scheduling and mistaken isolation of the overhaul work order task is avoided, and the overhaul efficiency is improved. The work management process of nuclear power unit overhaul is optimized, reasonable arrangement of overhaul work and construction period optimization are facilitated, and the pressure of plan engineers and isolation managers in the overhaul implementation period is relieved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of nuclear power plant work management, and in particular to a timeline-based conflict checking method and system. Background Art

[0002] As the complexity of industrial systems continues to increase, especially in the fields of nuclear power, aviation, and chemical industry, the operation and maintenance of large equipment has become increasingly dependent on precise planning and management. Taking nuclear power plants as an example, the safety and efficiency of their equipment operation and maintenance are directly related to the economic benefits and safety assurance of the power plant. During the overhaul or equipment maintenance of nuclear power plants, a large number of work order tasks, isolation tasks, and resource scheduling are involved. The sequence and timing of these tasks need to be closely coordinated to avoid equipment status conflicts, resource competition, and logical dependency issues, thereby ensuring the safety and efficiency of operations.

[0003] Existing task scheduling and conflict checking technologies are usually based on static planning or manual experience. These methods can meet basic needs in simple scenarios, but with the increase in the complexity of industrial systems, their shortcomings gradually become apparent. On the one hand, static planning methods have difficulty in dynamically adjusting task relationships and cannot adapt to the changing working conditions and resource usage in practice. On the other hand, they are highly dependent on manual experience and are difficult to systematize and automate. In addition, existing technologies generally lack the ability to dynamically model the relationship between tasks and equipment status and to check conflicts in real time, which often delays the discovery and resolution of conflicts, leading to extended overhaul periods, waste of resources, and even safety hazards. Summary of the invention

[0004] In view of the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is proposed.

[0005] Therefore, the technical problem solved by the present invention is: how to identify equipment status conflicts, sign type conflicts, isolation boundary and work object conflicts in advance, and avoid the risks caused by misscheduling and misisolation of overhaul work order tasks.

[0006] To solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides the following technical solutions: a timeline-based conflict checking method, comprising:

[0007] establishing a first object according to the first device;

[0008] Establishing an association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the timeline;

[0009] Calculate the first object corresponding to the first device and output a conflict result;

[0010] The first object is adjusted according to the conflict result.

[0011] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method described in the present invention, wherein: the establishing of the first object according to the first device includes establishing a work order task of the first object according to the first device.

[0012] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method described in the present invention, wherein: the establishing of the first object according to the first device also includes creating a work order task that isolates and associates the first object in the running isolation system.

[0013] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method described in the present invention, wherein: the establishment of the association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the timeline includes scheduling the first device work order task according to the first object work order task requirements.

[0014] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method of the present invention, wherein: the calculation of the first object corresponding to the first device includes performing a logical calculation of the task time according to the work order task and the first device scheduling information

[0015] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method of the present invention, the output conflict result includes: creating a listing task and a delisting task in the schedule of the first object after isolation creation, creating a logical relationship between the listing task and the delisting task and the work order task of the first object; performing a logical calculation of the listing and delisting task time according to the interface parameter setting and the work order scheduling information;

[0016] The conflict check logic mainly includes the conflict between isolation equipment tag status, the conflict between isolation equipment tag type, the conflict between isolation boundary equipment and work object, the conflict between isolation boundary equipment and isolation object equipment, and the conflict between work object equipment.

[0017] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking method of the present invention, wherein: the adjusting the first object according to the conflict result includes that the scheduling information of the listing task and the delisting task in the planning and scheduling system of the first object can be transmitted to the operation isolation system, and the actual listing time and delisting time can be transmitted to the overhaul planning and scheduling system;

[0018] Execute the conflict check function, conduct conflict checks from five aspects, analyze and troubleshoot the causes of the problems based on the conflict check results, and negotiate adjustment plans; after the adjustment is completed, recalculate the progress and conduct conflict checks again until there are no conflicts.

[0019] As a preferred solution of the timeline-based conflict checking system described in the present invention, it includes: an isolation module, a work order module, an overhaul plan scheduling module, and a conflict checking module;

[0020] The isolation module is used to create an isolation plan, including equipment boundaries, tag-up tasks, tag-off tasks, etc., associate isolation information with work order tasks, and dynamically track conflicts between isolation boundary equipment and work object equipment;

[0021] The work order module is used to receive task approval information and scheduling requirements, and to link with the isolation plan to generate logical relationships, provide real-time tracking and analysis of work order task progress, and support rescheduling of adjusted work orders;

[0022] The overhaul plan scheduling module is used to integrate the time information of work order tasks and isolation tasks, generate scheduling results, and perform conflict checks;

[0023] The conflict checking module is used to check conflicts from five aspects, provide conflict reports, assist users in adjusting plans, and dynamically monitor the adjusted conflict status until the conflict is within an acceptable range.

[0024] A computer device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the computer program to implement a timeline-based conflict checking method.

[0025] A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which implements the steps of a timeline-based conflict checking method when executed by a processor.

[0026] Beneficial effects of the present invention: The timeline-based conflict checking method provided by the present invention, the timeline-based conflict checking method, during the overhaul period, by collecting and integrating work order task preparation information, overhaul plan scheduling information and isolation and safety measures information, can identify equipment status conflicts, sign type conflicts, isolation boundary and work object conflicts in advance, avoid the risks caused by misscheduling and misisolation of overhaul work order tasks, optimize the work management process of nuclear power unit overhaul, help to reasonably arrange the overhaul work and optimize the construction period, reduce the pressure of planning engineers and isolation managers during the overhaul implementation, improve the economic benefits of the unit, and have the value and prospect of subsequent promotion and application in power plants. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0027] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other accompanying drawings can be obtained based on these accompanying drawings without paying creative work.

[0028] Figure 1 An overall flow chart of a timeline-based conflict checking method provided for the first embodiment of the present invention.

[0029] Figure 2A conflict checking logic diagram of a timeline-based conflict checking method provided for a second embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0030] In order to make the above-mentioned purposes, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with the drawings of the specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, but not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary persons in the art without creative work should fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0031] Example 1, reference Figure 1 , as an embodiment of the present invention, provides a timeline-based conflict checking method, comprising:

[0032] S1: Create a first object according to a first device.

[0033] Further, the establishing of the first object according to the first device includes establishing a work order task of the first object according to the first device, and creating a work order task of isolating and associating the first object in the running isolation system.

[0034] In the embodiment of the present application, the first equipment may be a key operation or maintenance equipment in a nuclear power plant, including a steam generator, a reactor cooling system, a main pump, a nuclear fuel assembly, a pressure vessel, etc. The first object may be used to describe a specific repair or maintenance task of the first equipment during the overhaul.

[0035] Furthermore, after the first object work order task is created (the work order task status is "prepared"), it can be transferred to the WBS of the project corresponding to the overhaul planning and scheduling system through the work order system-overhaul planning and scheduling system interface. After the overhaul planning and scheduling system performs scheduling, the scheduling information can be transferred to the work order system through the work order system-overhaul planning and scheduling system interface.

[0036] In an optional embodiment, the creation of the first object work order task can also be that when the work order task status reaches "approved", the work order task can be passed to the isolation module. After the work order task is associated with isolation, the isolation information can be passed to the work order task. When the work order task status changes, the work order task information will be updated to the isolation module.

[0037] It should be noted that a work order task (first object) is created in the work order system, and its task status is set to "prepare". The work order task is associated with the first equipment and contains detailed task information, such as: task name (such as "main pump inspection"). Task requirements (such as inspection duration, completion time, required resources). Associated equipment information (such as pressure vessel status, steam generator isolation requirements).

[0038] S2: Establishing an association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the time axis.

[0039] Furthermore, establishing the association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the timeline includes scheduling the first device work order task according to the first object work order task requirements.

[0040] In an embodiment of the present application, scheduling the first equipment work order task according to the first object work order task requirement can be to create a listing task and a delisting task in the overhaul plan scheduling module after the isolation is created, and after the isolation is associated with the work order, the logical relationship between the listing task and the delisting task and the work order can be automatically created, and the logical calculation of the listing and delisting task time can be performed according to the interface parameter settings and the work order scheduling information.

[0041] Furthermore, the scheduling information of the listing and delisting tasks by the planners in the overhaul planning and scheduling system can be transmitted to the operation isolation system, and the actual listing time and delisting time of the operating personnel can be transmitted to the overhaul planning and scheduling system.

[0042] In an optional embodiment, the task scheduling can be a priority-driven scheduling method, which assigns priorities according to the importance and urgency of the work order tasks, and schedules tasks in combination with equipment status and resource availability, giving priority to high-priority tasks, such as inspection and maintenance of critical equipment.

[0043] Specific steps: Assign work order task priorities (e.g. high, medium, low). High priority tasks take priority in occupying resources and time windows. Arrange the remaining tasks in order of priority to avoid resource and time conflicts. Applicable when rapid response or high-risk tasks are required.

[0044] It should be noted that according to the isolation scheduling information of the overhaul plan, the operating personnel will not have equipment status conflicts when carrying out isolation and signboard operations; according to the isolation scheduling information of the overhaul plan, the operating personnel will not have signboard type conflicts when carrying out isolation and signboard operations or the conflicts are within an acceptable range.

[0045] Example 2, reference Figure 1 Figure 2 , as an embodiment of the present invention, provides a timeline-based conflict checking method, comprising:

[0046] S3: Calculate the first object corresponding to the first device, and output a conflict result.

[0047] Further, calculating the first object corresponding to the first device includes performing a logical calculation of the task time according to the work order task and the first device scheduling information.

[0048] In an embodiment of the present application, outputting the conflict result includes creating a listing task and a delisting task in the schedule of the first object after isolation is created, creating a logical relationship between the listing task and the delisting task and the work order task of the first object; and performing logical calculations on the listing and delisting task times according to the interface parameter settings and the work order scheduling information.

[0049] Furthermore, the conflict checking logic mainly includes the conflict of isolation equipment tag status, the conflict of isolation tag equipment tag type, the conflict of isolation boundary equipment and work object, the conflict of isolation boundary equipment and isolation object equipment, and the conflict of work object equipment.

[0050] In an optional embodiment, the output conflict result can also be a task dependency conflict, with logical description: Check whether the logical relationship between tasks is correct to ensure that the preconditions of the tasks are met. Whether the tasks are executed according to the precondition logic (e.g., Task B can only be started after Task A is completed). Whether the unfinished tasks cause delays in the schedule of subsequent tasks. Adjust the order of tasks or complete key tasks in advance. Dynamically update the status of the dependency to prevent subsequent tasks from being unable to execute due to unsatisfied dependency conditions.

[0051] It should be noted that executing the conflict check function outputs the following conflict check results: isolation tag equipment tag status conflict (Tagout Schedule Position Conflict Report); isolation tag equipment tag type conflict (Tagout Schedule TagType Conflict Report); isolation boundary equipment and work object equipment conflict (Tagout Schedule Work Order Equipment Conflict Report); isolation boundary equipment and isolation object equipment conflict (Tagout Schedule Clearance Equipment Conflict Report); work object equipment conflict (Work Order Equipment Conflict Report).

[0052] S4: Adjust the first object according to the conflict result.

[0053] In an embodiment of the present application, adjusting the first object according to the conflict result can be that the scheduling information of the listing task and the delisting task in the planning and scheduling system of the first object can be transmitted to the operation isolation system, and the actual listing time and delisting time can be transmitted to the overhaul planning and scheduling system.

[0054] Execute the conflict check function, conduct conflict checks from five aspects, analyze and troubleshoot the causes of the problems based on the conflict check results, and negotiate adjustment plans; after the adjustment is completed, recalculate the progress and conduct conflict checks again until there are no conflicts.

[0055] According to the conflict check results, the overhaul plan and overhaul operation isolation manager will analyze, troubleshoot the cause of the problem, and negotiate the adjustment plan (planning schedule, isolation and listing instructions). After the adjustment is completed, the schedule will be recalculated, and the overhaul isolation manager will conduct a conflict check again. This cycle will be repeated and adjustments will be made continuously until there is no conflict or the conflict is within a known and controllable range.

[0056] In an optional embodiment, adjusting the first object according to the conflict result may also be to optimize resource reallocation in the conflict result analysis, and reallocate the resources required for the task in response to resource competition issues. Specific measures: Check whether the resources required for the task (such as personnel, tools, isolation equipment) conflict with the current resource pool. Adjust resource priority and adjust the order of resource allocation according to the importance of the task (such as risk level, high priority task). Prioritize resources for high-risk tasks, and low-priority tasks can be postponed or rescheduled.

[0057] Furthermore, the conflict checking logic mainly includes five categories: isolation equipment tag status conflict, isolation tag equipment tag type conflict, isolation boundary equipment and work object conflict, isolation boundary equipment and isolation object equipment conflict, work object equipment conflict, such as Figure 2 shown.

[0058] Isolation and tagging device tagging status conflict: In the same time period, a device acts as a boundary device for multiple isolations, or appears as an isolation boundary device multiple times in one isolation, and the tagging status is inconsistent. At this time, the isolation where the device is located and its tagging status are output as conflict between two (A→B) conflict results.

[0059] Isolation signboard equipment tag type conflict: In the same time period, a device acts as a boundary device for multiple isolations, or appears as an isolation boundary device multiple times in one isolation, and the tag types are inconsistent. At this time, the isolation where the device is located and its tag type are output as conflict between two (A→B) conflict results.

[0060] Conflict between isolation boundary devices and work object devices: In the same time period, a device is used as an isolation boundary device and a work object device at the same time. At this time, the isolation where the device is located and its work order tasks are output as conflict between two devices (A→B).

[0061] Conflict between isolation boundary devices and isolation target devices: In the same time period, a device is used as an isolation boundary device and an isolation target device at the same time. At this time, the isolation where the device is located is output as a conflict between two devices (A→B).

[0062] Work object equipment conflict: In the same time period, one device is used as the work object device for multiple work order tasks (when the work object is a device in a work item, a conflict check is also performed). At this time, the work order tasks to which the device belongs are output with conflict analysis results in a pairwise conflict manner.

[0063] It should be noted that according to the isolation scheduling information of the overhaul plan, the operating personnel will not have any sign type conflicts or the conflicts will be within an acceptable range when carrying out isolation sign operations; according to the scheduling information of the overhaul plan, there will be no conflicts between the isolation boundary equipment and the work object equipment of the work order task. If it cannot be adjusted and the risks are controllable after analysis, the isolation boundary equipment for overhaul will be summarized. After risk analysis and necessary approval, the isolation boundary equipment will be released to the person in charge of maintenance work by the isolation manager during the overhaul period.

[0064] Example 3: The following is an embodiment of the present invention, which provides a timeline-based conflict checking method. In order to verify the beneficial effects of the present invention, scientific demonstration is carried out through economic benefit calculation and simulation experiments.

[0065] First, in order to verify the effectiveness of the timeline-based conflict checking method in the present invention, a steam generator of a nuclear power plant is selected as the first equipment, and multiple first objects corresponding to it are constructed, including work order tasks, isolation tasks, and planning and scheduling tasks. The interaction process between the isolation system and the overhaul planning and scheduling system is simulated by experiments to verify the accuracy and innovation of the conflict checking and adjustment functions.

[0066] Test preparation:

[0067] In the Run Isolation System, create the first equipment (steam generator) and associate two main tasks:

[0068] Work order task A: Steam generator maintenance work order, which requires isolation and checking of operating pressure.

[0069] Work Order Task B: Pressure sensor replacement work order, involving a short equipment shutdown and isolation release.

[0070] The above work order tasks are preset in the overhaul planning and scheduling system, and corresponding isolation tasks (listing and delisting tasks) are created.

[0071] Set task scheduling information, including task start and end times, required resources (such as technicians, isolation tools), and equipment status (such as "running" or "isolated").

[0072] The conflict check logic is defined in the system, covering the following five aspects: Isolation equipment tag status conflict. Isolation tag equipment tag type conflict. Isolation boundary equipment conflicts with work objects. Isolation boundary equipment conflicts with isolation object equipment. Work object equipment conflicts.

[0073] Experimental implementation:

[0074] Create the first object based on the first equipment and import work order tasks A and B into the overhaul planning and scheduling system. The system automatically generates listing tasks and delisting tasks, and synchronizes the scheduling information to the operation isolation system through the interface. In the operation isolation system, perform a preliminary conflict check and find the following problems:

[0075] The listing task times of work order tasks A and B conflict.

[0076] The tag type of work order task B does not match the isolation status of the current equipment.

[0077] According to the conflict check results, adjust the task order in the planning and scheduling system:

[0078] Move the tagging task time of work order task A forward to avoid the conflicting time period of task B. Modify the tag type of task B to ensure that it matches the equipment isolation status. After the adjustment is completed, recalculate the scheduling information and perform the conflict check again until the conflict is eliminated or reduced to an acceptable range.

[0079] Table 1 Adjustment data record table

[0080]

[0081]

[0082] From the table data, we can see that before the task adjustment, there was a time conflict and a sign type conflict between Task A and Task B. After the adjustment: the time arrangement of the signboard task changed from the original time conflict to a non-conflict state, which effectively avoided the competition for equipment resources and improved the rationality of the schedule. The sign type conflict was resolved by modifying the sign setting of Task B, ensuring the matching of the sign and the equipment status and eliminating potential operational risks.

[0083] Through the task association relationship based on the timeline, it can automatically generate listing and delisting tasks and perform conflict detection, which greatly improves the accuracy and efficiency of scheduling compared with the existing manual scheduling method. The scheduling information after task adjustment is synchronized to the operation isolation system and the planning and scheduling system through the interface, realizing real-time update and interconnection of information. Through multi-faceted conflict checking logic, it ensures accurate matching between the status of the equipment and the task logic, reducing the risk of operational errors caused by conflicts.

[0084] Embodiment 4: The following is an embodiment of the present invention, which provides a timeline-based conflict checking system, including:

[0085] Isolation management module, create and manage isolation boundary equipment, work object equipment and isolation object equipment. Set isolation tagging tasks and de-tagging tasks, record equipment tagging status and tag type. Associate isolation tasks with work order tasks, and generate isolation plans through logical algorithms. During overhaul, provide association status information between equipment isolation boundaries and work objects. Support status management of multiple devices (location status, business status). Dynamically track conflicts between isolation boundary equipment and work object equipment. Provide equipment tag type management function, record different types of tags and perform conflict analysis

[0086] The work order management module manages the creation, approval, status update and plan adjustment of work order tasks. It provides the function of associating work order tasks with isolation information to realize the linkage between work order scheduling and isolation scheduling. It receives the work order scheduling results from the overhaul plan scheduling module and updates the time information of work order execution. It records the progress status of work order tasks and supports dynamic adjustment and conflict feedback of work orders. It automatically updates the logical relationship between work orders and isolation tasks. It provides real-time tracking and analysis of the progress of work order tasks and supports rescheduling of adjusted work orders.

[0087] The overhaul plan scheduling module is responsible for the overall scheduling of the overhaul plan and integrates the time information of isolation and work order tasks. It creates tagging tasks and detagging tasks and associates them with the logical relationship of work order tasks. It provides conflict checking function and analyzes equipment status conflicts, tag type conflicts and isolation boundary conflicts through the timeline. It calculates the time logic of tagging tasks and detagging tasks and automatically generates executable scheduling information. It supports real-time conflict checking and outputs five types of conflict checking results (equipment status conflicts, tag type conflicts, etc.). It interacts with the data interface of the isolation management module and the work order management module to realize the dynamic update of scheduling data.

[0088] The conflict check and feedback module centrally analyzes the data information provided by the isolation management module and the overhaul scheduling module, and performs logical algorithm conflict checks. It analyzes the conflicts between the status of different equipment, signage types, and isolation boundaries according to the timeline. It provides conflict reports and supports interactive analysis and adjustment. It automatically outputs five types of conflict results. It provides conflict cause analysis function and supports recalculation after user negotiation and adjustment of the plan. It dynamically monitors the adjusted conflict status to ensure that the conflict is within a known and controllable range.

[0089] If the function is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or the part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods of each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), disk or optical disk, etc. Various media that can store program codes.

[0090] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as an ordered list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by an instruction execution system, device or apparatus (such as a computer-based system, a system including a processor, or other system that can fetch instructions from an instruction execution system, device or apparatus and execute instructions), or in conjunction with such instruction execution systems, devices or apparatuses. For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate or transmit a program for use by an instruction execution system, device or apparatus, or in conjunction with such instruction execution systems, devices or apparatuses.

[0091] More specific examples of computer-readable media (a non-exhaustive list) include the following: an electrical connection with one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk case (magnetic device), a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber device, and a portable compact disk read-only memory (CDROM). In addition, the computer-readable medium may even be a paper or other suitable medium on which the program is printed, since the program may be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, deciphering, or processing in another suitable manner as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

[0092] It should be understood that the various parts of the present invention can be implemented by hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof. In the above-mentioned embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented by software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented by hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented by any one of the following technologies known in the art or their combination: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function for a data signal, a dedicated integrated circuit having a suitable combination of logic gate circuits, a programmable gate array (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc. It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention and are not limited. Although the present invention is described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the technical solution of the present invention can be modified or replaced by equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solution of the present invention, which should be included in the scope of the claims of the present invention.

[0093] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions of the present invention may be modified or replaced by equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, which should all be included in the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A timeline-based conflict checking method, characterized in that: include: establishing a first object according to the first device; Establishing an association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the timeline; Calculate the first object corresponding to the first device and output a conflict result; The first object is adjusted according to the conflict result.

2. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The establishing of the first object according to the first device includes establishing a first object work order task according to the first device.

3. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The establishing of the first object according to the first device also includes creating an isolation in the running isolation system and associating a first object work order task.

4. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The establishing of the association relationship between the first device and different first objects based on the timeline includes scheduling the first device work order task according to the first object work order task requirements.

5. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The calculating the first object corresponding to the first device includes performing a logical calculation of the task time according to the work order task and the first device scheduling information.

6. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 5, characterized in that: The output conflict result includes: creating a listing task and a delisting task in the schedule of the first object after the isolation is created, creating a logical relationship between the listing task and the delisting task and the work order task of the first object; performing a logical calculation of the listing and delisting task time according to the interface parameter setting and the work order scheduling information; The conflict check logic mainly includes the conflict between isolation equipment tag status, the conflict between isolation equipment tag type, the conflict between isolation boundary equipment and work object, the conflict between isolation boundary equipment and isolation object equipment, and the conflict between work object equipment.

7. The timeline-based conflict checking method according to claim 6, characterized in that: The adjusting of the first object according to the conflict result includes that the scheduling information of the listing task and the delisting task in the planning and scheduling system of the first object can be transmitted to the operation isolation system, and the actual listing time and delisting time can be transmitted to the overhaul planning and scheduling system; Execute the conflict check function, conduct conflict checks from five aspects, analyze and troubleshoot the causes of the problems based on the conflict check results, and negotiate adjustment plans; After the adjustment is completed, recalculate the progress and then perform conflict checks until there are no conflicts.

8. A system using the timeline-based conflict checking method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: Includes isolation module, work order module, overhaul planning and scheduling module, and conflict checking module; The isolation module is used to create an isolation plan, including equipment boundaries, tag-up tasks, tag-off tasks, etc., associate isolation information with work order tasks, and dynamically track conflicts between isolation boundary equipment and work object equipment; The work order module is used to receive task approval information and scheduling requirements, and to link with the isolation plan to generate logical relationships, provide real-time tracking and analysis of work order task progress, and support rescheduling of adjusted work orders; The overhaul plan scheduling module is used to integrate the time information of work order tasks and isolation tasks, generate scheduling results, and perform conflict checks; The conflict checking module is used to check conflicts from five aspects, provide conflict reports, assist users in adjusting plans, and dynamically monitor the adjusted conflict status until the conflict is within an acceptable range.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the processor implements the steps of the timeline-based conflict checking method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the timeline-based conflict checking method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images