Enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation method

Abstract

The invention discloses an enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation method, which can accurately evaluate and determine key index values of environmental management by utilizing actual environmental protection data of an enterprise, and can accurately evaluate and determine the key index values of environmental management by constructing an evaluation model meeting a standard, setting an environmental protection comprehensive score weight in evaluation parameters and establishing a comprehensive score objective function. And finally, the enterprise obtains an accurate comprehensive score of environmental protection, so that the environmental protection level of the enterprise is effectively judged.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of environmental protection, and in particular to a method for evaluating the standardization of environmental protection in an enterprise. Background Art

[0002] As environmental protection is receiving increasing global attention, standardized assessment of the environmental protection level of enterprises, as one of the important sources of environmental impact, is particularly important.

[0003] In the existing technology, the environmental protection performance of enterprises is mainly evaluated through self-reporting or third-party audits, but this method has certain subjectivity and limitations, and it is difficult to objectively and comprehensively reflect the actual environmental protection performance of enterprises.

[0004] In addition, the existing technology lacks a complete set of standardized assessment systems for corporate environmental protection, and the assessment methods are single or lack a systematic quantitative setting of scoring indicators, which makes it difficult to meet the actual needs of enterprises in the context of ever-changing environmental laws and technical standards. Therefore, developing a standardized assessment method that can objectively and systematically assess the environmental protection level of enterprises has become one of the urgent issues to be solved in the current field of environmental protection. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the standardization of enterprise environmental protection so as to solve the problems raised in the above-mentioned background technology.

[0006] According to one aspect of the present application, a method for evaluating corporate environmental protection standardization includes the following steps:

[0007] Based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise, determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management, and build an enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment model based on the at least one key indicator value;

[0008] Setting at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardized evaluation model, wherein the evaluation parameter includes an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field;

[0009] Establishing a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment model to form a comprehensive score according to the weighted value of each assessment parameter in the at least one assessment parameter;

[0010] Solving the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtaining an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result;

[0011] The actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise is determined according to the actual score.

[0012] Preferably, the step of determining at least one key indicator value of environmental management based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise includes:

[0013] Obtaining the corporate identity of the target enterprise;

[0014] generating the enterprise type of the target enterprise based on the enterprise identifier;

[0015] At least one key indicator value of the environmental management is generated by combining the enterprise type, the environmental collection data and the monitoring results.

[0016] Preferably, determining the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score includes:

[0017] Determine the current interval according to the actual score;

[0018] When the current interval is the first interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade is an unqualified grade;

[0019] When the current interval is the second interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a qualified level;

[0020] When the current interval is the third interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a good level;

[0021] When the current interval is the fourth interval, it is determined that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is an excellent level.

[0022] Preferably, the calculation formula of the comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model is:

[0023]

[0024] Among them, M is the comprehensive score, a i is the weight value of the i-th evaluation parameter, M i is the score of the corresponding evaluation parameter.

[0025] Preferably, the environmental protection collected data includes at least one of water pollution emission data, air pollution emission data, and soil pollution emission data.

[0026] Preferably, when calculating the comprehensive scoring objective function, if there are missing items, the calculation formula is:

[0027] Among them, T is the actual score, Q is the weighted score, and p is the weighted score for missing items.

[0028] According to another aspect of the present application, a corporate environmental protection standardization assessment device includes:

[0029] A construction module, used to determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management based on the environmental data collection and monitoring results of the target enterprise, and to construct a standardized assessment model for enterprise environmental protection based on the at least one key indicator value;

[0030] A setting module, used to set at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, wherein the evaluation parameter includes an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field;

[0031] An establishment module is used to establish a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, and the weighted value of each evaluation parameter in the at least one evaluation parameter constitutes a comprehensive score;

[0032] A solution module, used for solving the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtaining an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result;

[0033] An evaluation module is used to determine the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score.

[0034] Preferably, the calculation formula of the comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model is:

[0035]

[0036] Among them, M is the comprehensive score, a i is the weight value of the i-th evaluation parameter, M i is the score of the corresponding evaluation parameter.

[0037] According to another aspect of the present application, an electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the method in any possible implementation of the first aspect and the second aspect.

[0038] According to another aspect of the present application, a computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program thereon, and the program is executed by a processor to be used for instructions in any possible implementation of the first aspect or the second aspect.

[0039] According to another aspect of the present application, a computer program product includes a computer program, wherein the computer program is executed to be used for the method in any possible implementation manner of the first aspect or the second aspect.

[0040] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: the present invention can utilize the actual environmental protection data of the enterprise to accurately evaluate and determine the key indicator values ​​of environmental management. By constructing an evaluation model that meets the standards, setting the weights of the comprehensive environmental protection score in the evaluation parameters, and establishing a comprehensive score objective function, and solving it, the enterprise will eventually obtain an accurate comprehensive environmental protection score, thereby effectively determining its environmental protection level. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] Figure 1 The present invention is a flowchart of a method for evaluating the standardization of corporate environmental protection according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0042] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0043] Figure 1 It is shown that a method for evaluating the standardization of enterprise environmental protection is provided according to an embodiment of the present invention, comprising the following steps:

[0044] S10: Based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise, determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management, and build an enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment model based on the at least one key indicator value.

[0045] Through internal or external monitoring systems, enterprises can collect multi-dimensional data on environmental protection, including emission data of waste gas, wastewater, solid waste, resource consumption data, and compliance information. Enterprises can use sensors, monitoring platforms, and data management systems to collect and archive these environmental protection-related data in real time.

[0046] After the data collection is completed, the key indicator values ​​required for the evaluation (such as pollutant emission concentration, energy consumption rate, etc.) are extracted based on these raw data, so as to construct a complete environmental protection standardized evaluation model. This model is a framework for evaluating the environmental protection level of enterprises. It contains the core elements and data sources of various environmental protection dimensions to ensure that data from all areas are taken into consideration.

[0047] The specific environmental protection standardization assessment model is as follows:

[0048]

[0049]

[0050]

[0051]

[0052] In one embodiment, based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise, at least one key indicator value of environmental management is determined, including:

[0053] Obtain the corporate logo of the target enterprise;

[0054] Generate the enterprise type of the target enterprise based on the enterprise logo;

[0055] At least one key indicator value of environmental management is generated by combining enterprise type, environmental collection data and monitoring results.

[0056] In the above scheme, by obtaining the identification of the target enterprise and generating the enterprise type accordingly, the environmental management needs of different types of enterprises can be classified, thereby improving the applicability of the assessment model. By combining the enterprise type with environmental collection data and monitoring results, key indicators reflecting the current environmental protection status of the enterprise can be generated more accurately, ensuring that the specific needs and differences of different enterprises in environmental protection assessments are fully considered, making the assessment model more targeted and flexible, and thereby improving the accuracy and credibility of standardized assessments.

[0057] By integrating multi-source information to generate key indicator values, the model does not rely on a single data source, but instead comprehensively considers enterprise characteristics and monitoring realities, enhancing the model's breadth and level of detail, thereby ensuring evaluation results.

[0058] For example, in one embodiment, if the enterprise is identified as a wastewater treatment enterprise, the key indicator values ​​of the enterprise's water pollution emissions are mainly evaluated based on the following standards: the setting of the sewage outlet for wastewater discharge should comply with the relevant provisions of the "Technical Specifications for Sewage Monitoring" (HJ91.1) and the "Technical Requirements for Standardized Remediation of Sewage Outlets (Trial)", and environmental protection signs should be set in accordance with the requirements of the "Environmental Protection Graphic Signs Discharge Outlets (Sources)" (GB15562.1).

[0059] The sludge filter press site for wastewater treatment needs to set up a cofferdam and take anti-seepage measures to ensure that the sewage generated by the filter press is properly collected and returned for treatment.

[0060] For example, in one embodiment, if the enterprise is identified as a waste gas treatment enterprise, the key indicator values ​​of the enterprise's atmospheric pollution emissions are evaluated according to the following standards: the height, number and location of the exhaust chimneys for waste gas emissions shall comply with the requirements of the environmental impact assessment, the pollutant discharge permit and relevant emission standards, and comply with the "Technical Specifications for Stationary Source Waste Gas Monitoring" (HJ / T397) and the "Technical Requirements for Standardized Treatment of Wastewater Outlets (Trial)" regulations, and at the same time, environmental protection signs shall be set up in accordance with the requirements of the "Environmental Protection Graphic Signs Emission Outlets (Sources)" (GB15562.1).

[0061] Materials that are prone to dust generation, such as coal, gangue, coal cinder, fly ash, cement, lime, gypsum, sand and soil, should be stored in a closed manner; if they cannot be sealed, a strict enclosure that is not lower than the stacking height should be set up, and covering and other measures should be taken to prevent and control dust pollution.

[0062] For example, in one embodiment, if the enterprise is identified as a hazardous waste material processing enterprise, the key indicator value of hazardous waste emissions of the enterprise is evaluated according to the following standards: Hazardous waste storage sites should comply with the "Hazardous Waste Storage Pollution Control Standard" (GB 18597-2001).

[0063] S20: Setting at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, wherein the evaluation parameter includes an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field.

[0064] In the framework of the evaluation model, specific evaluation parameters are set for different environmental protection fields. These parameters reflect the performance of various dimensions of the company's environmental protection level. These parameters are assigned different "comprehensive scoring weights" to reflect the importance of each parameter in the overall environmental protection evaluation.

[0065] The specific environmental protection comprehensive scoring weights are as follows:

[0066]

[0067]

[0068] S30: Establishing a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model to form a comprehensive score according to the weighted value of each evaluation parameter in the at least one evaluation parameter.

[0069] A comprehensive scoring result can be obtained to reflect the overall environmental protection performance of the enterprise. The objective function of the comprehensive scoring is widely used, especially for standardized environmental protection assessments that require quantification of multiple factors and multi-faceted comparisons.

[0070] S40: Solving the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtaining an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result.

[0071] The comprehensive score is obtained by calculating the objective function to generate a specific evaluation result. This score calculation usually depends on the parameters and weights set in the model. A specific value is solved based on the company's current data to represent the company's environmental protection standardization score.

[0072] Different scoring thresholds can be set based on the actual situation of the enterprise and environmental protection requirements. For example, the actual score can be compared with the established scoring criteria to determine whether the enterprise has reached a qualified level of environmental protection or needs to take additional improvement measures. The scoring solution can help enterprises quantitatively evaluate their current environmental protection performance and can also be used for horizontal comparisons of different enterprises.

[0073] S50: Determine the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score.

[0074] According to the numerical range of the comprehensive score, the environmental protection level of the enterprise is divided into different grades. The grades can be set as "excellent", "good", "qualified" and "unqualified" to quantify the evaluation results. This hierarchical judgment standard is usually set according to the environmental protection requirements of specific industries and regions, so as to ensure that the evaluation standards meet the actual operational requirements.

[0075] Enterprises can judge the current environmental protection status according to their scoring levels and take corresponding improvement or strengthening measures, which is convenient for enterprise management to understand the current environmental protection status and convenient for regulatory authorities or third-party review agencies to conduct rapid qualitative evaluation. The rating results can also be used for the continuous improvement of the environmental protection performance of enterprises, helping enterprises to continuously optimize their environmental protection strategies and implementation standards.

[0076] In an embodiment, specifically, determining the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score includes:

[0077] Determine the current interval according to the actual score;

[0078] When the current interval is the first interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade is an unqualified grade;

[0079] When the current interval is the second interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a qualified level;

[0080] When the current interval is the third interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a good level;

[0081] When the current interval is the fourth interval, it is determined that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is an excellent level.

[0082] For example, the following scoring range is used to judge the evaluation results of corporate environmental protection:

[0083] If the actual score is <10, the enterprise's environmental protection level is determined to be unqualified;

[0084] If 10≤actual score<20, the enterprise's environmental protection level is determined to be qualified;

[0085] If 20≤actual score<70, the enterprise's environmental protection level is determined to be good;

[0086] If the actual score is ≥70, the company's environmental protection level is determined to be excellent.

[0087] The actual evaluation calculation formula for each evaluation parameter is:

[0088] Among them, T is the actual score, Q is the weighted score, and p is the weighted score for missing items.

[0089] In one embodiment, specifically, the calculation formula of the comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model is:

[0090]

[0091] Among them, M is the comprehensive score, a i is the weight value of the i-th evaluation parameter, M i is the score of the corresponding evaluation parameter.

[0092] In the above scheme, the function of the formula is to integrate the performance scores of the enterprise in each independent evaluation area into a total score by weighted average, and each evaluation parameter score M i It indicates the specific performance of an enterprise in a specific field (such as water pollution prevention, solid waste management, energy use, etc.), and the weight a i Used to balance the importance of different areas in the overall environmental protection score.

[0093] In one embodiment, specifically, the environmental protection collected data includes at least one of water pollution emission data, air pollution emission data, and soil pollution emission data.

[0094] In the above technical solution, by analyzing these environmental collection data, the actual effectiveness of the enterprise in environmental management can be comprehensively evaluated. Combined with the emissions of water pollution, air pollution and soil pollution, the environmental impact of the enterprise in their respective fields can be determined, and key indicators can be provided for the comprehensive score, thereby achieving a more targeted and effective environmental protection assessment.

[0095] Enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment device, including:

[0096] A construction module, used to determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management based on the environmental protection data collection and monitoring results of the target enterprise, and to construct a standardized assessment model for enterprise environmental protection based on the at least one key indicator value;

[0097] A setting module, used to set at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, the evaluation parameter including an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field;

[0098] Establishing a module for establishing a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, wherein the weighted value of each evaluation parameter in at least one evaluation parameter constitutes a comprehensive score;

[0099] A solution module is used to solve the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtain an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result;

[0100] The evaluation module is used to determine the actual corporate environmental protection level of the target enterprise based on the actual score.

[0101] In one embodiment, specifically, the calculation formula of the comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model is:

[0102]

[0103] Among them, M is the comprehensive score, a i is the weight value of the i-th evaluation parameter, M i is the score of the corresponding evaluation parameter.

[0104] Furthermore, for example, the performance score of “water pollution prevention” in the enterprise evaluation model is 70 (M i =70), and the performance score for “air pollution prevention and control” was 80 (M i =80), and the weights of these two areas are 0.2 and 0.15 respectively, then the contribution of these two areas in the comprehensive score will be 0.2*70=14 and 0.15*80=12 respectively. The model will continue to calculate other areas and finally add up the weighted scores of each area to get the total score M.

[0105] In a third aspect, an electronic device comprises a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the method in any possible implementation of the first aspect and the second aspect.

[0106] Specifically, the functions can be implemented in modular or software form, and when used as an independent application or embedded in a computer device, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this, the technical solution of the present application or the part that contributes to the prior art can be stored in a storage medium and used by a computer device (such as a personal computer, a server, a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present application. The aforementioned storage medium includes, but is not limited to: a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a disk or an optical disk, and other media that can store program codes.

[0107] A fourth aspect is a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, the program being executed by a processor to perform instructions in any possible implementation of the first aspect or the second aspect.

[0108] Among them, the computer-readable storage medium may include various forms of media, such as a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a disk, an optical disk, etc., which can store program codes to enable a computer device (including a personal computer, a server or a network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps in the method.

[0109] According to a fifth aspect, a computer program product comprises a computer program, wherein the computer program is executed to perform a method in any possible implementation of the first aspect or the second aspect.

[0110] Parts not involved in the present invention are the same as the prior art or can be implemented by the prior art. Although the embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and variations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A standardized assessment method for enterprise environmental protection, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise, determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management, and build an enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment model based on the at least one key indicator value; Setting at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardized evaluation model, wherein the evaluation parameter includes an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field; Establishing a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment model to form a comprehensive score according to the weighted value of each assessment parameter in the at least one assessment parameter; Solving the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtaining an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result; The actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise is determined according to the actual score.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Determining at least one key indicator value of environmental management based on the environmental protection collection data and monitoring results of the target enterprise includes: Obtaining the corporate identity of the target enterprise; generating the enterprise type of the target enterprise based on the enterprise identifier; At least one key indicator value of the environmental management is generated by combining the enterprise type, the environmental collection data and the monitoring results.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Determining the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score includes: Determine the current interval according to the actual score; When the current interval is the first interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade is an unqualified grade; When the current interval is the second interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a qualified level; When the current interval is the third interval, determining that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is a good level; When the current interval is the fourth interval, it is determined that the actual enterprise environmental protection level is an excellent level.

4. The enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation formula of the comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model is: Among them, M is the comprehensive score, a i is the weight value of the i-th evaluation parameter, M i is the score of the corresponding evaluation parameter.

5. The enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The environmental protection collected data includes at least one of water pollution emission data, air pollution emission data, and soil pollution emission data.

6. The enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method according to claim 4 is characterized in that: in, When calculating the comprehensive scoring objective function, if there are missing items, the calculation formula is: Among them, T is the actual score, Q is the weighted score, and p is the weighted score for missing items.

7. An enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment device, characterized in that: include: A construction module, used to determine at least one key indicator value of environmental management based on the environmental data collection and monitoring results of the target enterprise, and to construct a standardized assessment model for enterprise environmental protection based on the at least one key indicator value; A setting module, used to set at least one evaluation parameter of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, wherein the evaluation parameter includes an environmental protection comprehensive scoring weight for evaluating the performance of the enterprise in at least one environmental protection field; An establishment module is used to establish a comprehensive scoring objective function of the enterprise environmental protection standardization evaluation model, and the weighted value of each evaluation parameter in the at least one evaluation parameter constitutes a comprehensive score; A solution module, used for solving the comprehensive scoring objective function to obtain a solution result, and obtaining an actual score of the evaluation result according to the solution result; An evaluation module is used to determine the actual enterprise environmental protection level grade of the target enterprise according to the actual score.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: The program is executed by a processor to implement the enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that The computer program is executed to implement the enterprise environmental protection standardization assessment method according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images