Technical difference degree evaluation method and device, equipment and readable storage medium

Abstract

The invention relates to a technical difference degree evaluation method and device, equipment and a readable storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: obtaining research result data of at least two to-be-evaluated areas for different sub-fields in a target field in a preset historical time period; for any to-be-evaluated region, according to the research result data of the to-be-evaluated region in different sub-fields, determining research result scores of the to-be-evaluated region in the target field; and determining the technical difference degree of different to-be-evaluated areas in the target field according to the size relationship between the research result scores corresponding to the to-be-evaluated areas. By adopting the method, the technical difference degree of different areas in different technical fields can be objectively and accurately evaluated.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of academic influence prediction, and in particular to a method, device, equipment and readable storage medium for evaluating the degree of technical difference. Background Art

[0002] At present, the technological development levels in different regions and in different technological fields are uneven, and each region has its own characteristics in different technological fields and dimensions.

[0003] Assessing the technological gap between different regions in different technological fields is crucial to understanding one's own strengths and weaknesses, clarifying one's own technological development position, and learning from the technological development experience of advanced regions. However, existing technological gap assessment methods mostly rely on economic statistical data, which is difficult to accurately reflect the rapid development and multidisciplinary integration characteristics of emerging technologies, and there is an urgent need to solve this problem. Summary of the invention

[0004] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a method, device, equipment and readable storage medium for evaluating the degree of technological difference in response to the above-mentioned technical problems, which can objectively and accurately evaluate the degree of technological difference in different regions in different technical fields.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating the degree of technical difference, comprising:

[0006] Obtain research results data on different sub-fields of the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0007] For any area to be evaluated, determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0008] Based on the relationship between the research results scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated, the degree of technological difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field is determined.

[0009] In one embodiment, determining the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields includes:

[0010] For any sub-field, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field;

[0011] According to the basic achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields, the research achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in the target field are determined.

[0012] In one embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations; accordingly, according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined, including:

[0013] Determine the first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the target field;

[0014] Determine the second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements and the number of citations of the achievements in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated, as well as the number of research achievements and the number of citations of the achievements in the target field of the area to be evaluated;

[0015] The research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field is determined based on the first achievement score and / or second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0016] In one embodiment, according to the number of research results and the number of citations of the sub-field of the area to be evaluated, and the number of research results and the number of citations of the results in the target field of the area to be evaluated, the second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined, including:

[0017] The ratio of the number of citations and the number of research results in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated is used as the first achievement impact parameter;

[0018] The ratio of the number of citations to the number of research results in the target field of the region to be evaluated is used as the second achievement impact parameter;

[0019] The ratio of the first achievement impact parameter to the second achievement impact parameter is used as the second achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0020] In one embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations; accordingly, according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined, including:

[0021] Determine the third achievement score of the area to be assessed in the sub-field according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the sub-field of the area to be assessed, as well as the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the target field of the area to be assessed;

[0022] According to the third-party achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields, the research achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in the target field are determined.

[0023] In one embodiment, the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the target field, including:

[0024] The ratio of the number of citations and the number of authorizations of achievements in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated is used as the third achievement impact parameter;

[0025] The ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the target field of the area to be evaluated is used as the fourth achievement impact parameter;

[0026] The ratio of the third achievement impact parameter to the fourth achievement impact parameter is used as the third achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0027] In one embodiment, after determining the degree of technical differences between different areas to be evaluated in the target field, the method further includes:

[0028] For any area to be assessed, a research plan is formulated for the area to be assessed based on the degree of technological difference between the area to be assessed and other areas to be assessed in the target field; the research plan is a research plan for the target field.

[0029] In a second aspect, the present application also provides a device for evaluating the degree of technical difference, comprising:

[0030] An acquisition module is used to acquire research results data of different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0031] The first determination module determines, for any area to be evaluated, the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0032] The second determination module is used to determine the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field according to the size relationship between the research achievement scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated.

[0033] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0034] Obtain research results data on different sub-fields of the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0035] For any area to be evaluated, determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0036] Based on the relationship between the research results scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated, the degree of technological difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field is determined.

[0037] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0038] Obtain research results data on different sub-fields of the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0039] For any area to be evaluated, determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0040] Based on the relationship between the research results scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated, the degree of technological difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field is determined.

[0041] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the following steps when executed by a processor:

[0042] Obtain research results data on different sub-fields of the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0043] For any area to be evaluated, determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0044] Based on the relationship between the research results scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated, the degree of technological difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field is determined.

[0045] The above-mentioned method, device, equipment and readable storage medium for evaluating the degree of technological difference obtain the research results data of different sub-fields in the target field for at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period, and then determine the research results score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the research results data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields, and determine the degree of technological difference of different areas to be evaluated in the target field based on the size relationship between the corresponding research results scores of different areas to be evaluated. In the process of determining the degree of technological difference, the above-mentioned method considers the research results data of different areas to be evaluated in different sub-fields in the target field. Since the research results data can characterize the development status of the area to be evaluated in the corresponding technical field, compared with the traditional technology of determining the degree of technological difference based on economic statistical data, this method can objectively and accurately evaluate the degree of technological difference between different regions in different technical fields. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0046] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or the related technologies, the drawings required for use in the embodiments of the present application or the related technical descriptions will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0047] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a process flow of a method for evaluating a degree of technical difference in one embodiment;

[0048] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a process for determining a basic achievement score in one embodiment;

[0049] Figure 3 A flowchart of a step of determining a basic achievement score in another embodiment;

[0050] Figure 4 A flowchart of the steps of determining a research plan in an embodiment;

[0051] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a method for evaluating the degree of technical difference in another embodiment;

[0052] Figure 6 is a structural block diagram of a device for evaluating the degree of technical difference in one embodiment;

[0053] Figure 7 FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0054] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0055] In one embodiment, Figure 1 As shown, a method for evaluating the degree of technical differences is provided. This embodiment uses the method applied to a terminal as an example for illustration. It can be understood that the method can also be applied to a server, and can also be applied to a system including a terminal and a server, and is implemented through the interaction between the terminal and the server. In this embodiment, the method includes the following steps:

[0056] S110, obtaining research results data on different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period.

[0057] The area to be evaluated may be an area where there is a need to determine the degree of technical difference, and this application does not impose any limitation on the regional scope of the area to be evaluated.

[0058] Exemplarily, the area to be evaluated can be a province, a country, or a region. It is understandable that in order to make the technical difference degree evaluation meaningful, usually, the evaluation objects of the technical difference degree evaluation are different areas to be evaluated within the same regional scope, that is, between different provinces, or between different countries.

[0059] Among them, the preset historical period can be set based on manual experience or actual evaluation needs. For example, the preset historical period can be 3 years, 5 years, or 10 years. This application does not impose any limitation on the setting of the preset historical period.

[0060] Among them, the target field can be a large technical field, for example, the target field can be the field of artificial intelligence, the field of biotechnology, the field of agricultural technology, etc. Different target fields correspond to different sub-fields. Taking the target field of artificial intelligence as an example, its corresponding sub-fields may include the field of smart chips, the field of smart display units, the field of material technology, and the field of hardware applications. Of course, under normal circumstances, different sub-fields can be further divided, and accordingly, the sub-fields of the field of artificial intelligence can also be used as the target field in this application. For example, when the target field is the field of smart chips, its corresponding sub-fields may include the field of image processors, the field of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), the field of application-specific integrated circuits, the field of brain-like chips, etc.

[0061] Among them, research results usually include papers, patents, software copyrights and reports, and the corresponding research results data may include the number and citations of different research results.

[0062] For example, in this embodiment, the research results data of different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period can be obtained by data retrieval. For example, the research results data can be retrieved and obtained through different databases.

[0063] S120, for any area to be evaluated, determining the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0064] In this embodiment, the research achievement scores in the target fields can be determined for different areas to be evaluated.

[0065] In an optional implementation, the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields may be input into a pre-trained score determination model to obtain the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0066] In another optional implementation, for any sub-field, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field can be determined based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the corresponding target field; and the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the corresponding target field can be determined based on the basic achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0067] Among them, the basic achievement score is used to represent the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the corresponding sub-field, which can be understood as the proportion of the research achievements of the area to be evaluated in this sub-field to the research achievements in the target field.

[0068] Exemplarily, for the research results of any area to be evaluated in any sub-field, the research results data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research results data of the area to be evaluated in the target field can be input into a pre-trained scoring determination model to obtain the basic results score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field.

[0069] Furthermore, the weighted sum of the basic achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields of the target field is used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the corresponding target field. The weight coefficients corresponding to different sub-fields can be determined based on manual experience or set by the user according to the user's needs, and this application does not impose any restrictions on this.

[0070] S130, determining the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field according to the relationship between the research achievement scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated.

[0071] Specifically, in this embodiment, for any two areas to be evaluated (for example, area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated), if the research achievement score corresponding to area A to be evaluated is less than the research achievement score corresponding to area B to be evaluated, it is determined that there is a technical difference between area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated in the target field.

[0072] Furthermore, in this embodiment, the correspondence between the score difference and the degree of technical difference can be determined in advance, and the degree of technical difference corresponding to the score difference of the research results between the evaluated area A and the evaluated area B in the above correspondence can be used as the degree of technical difference between the two.

[0073] In the above-mentioned method for evaluating the degree of technological difference, the research results data of different sub-fields in the target field are obtained for at least two regions to be evaluated within a preset historical period, and then the research results scores of the regions to be evaluated in the target field are determined based on the research results data of the regions to be evaluated in different sub-fields, and the degree of technological difference of the different regions to be evaluated in the target field is determined based on the size relationship between the corresponding research results scores of the different regions to be evaluated. In the process of determining the degree of technological difference, the above-mentioned method considers the research results data of different sub-fields in the target field of different regions to be evaluated. Since the research results data can characterize the development status of the region to be evaluated in the corresponding technical field, compared with the traditional technology that determines the degree of technological difference based on economic statistical data, this method can objectively and accurately evaluate the degree of technological difference of different regions in different technical fields.

[0074] Based on the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment. In this optional embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations; in this case, the process of determining the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field is refined.

[0075] See also Figure 2 The steps shown to determine the basic outcome score include:

[0076] S210, determining a first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0077] Among them, the number of research results can be understood as the publication data of research results. When the research results are papers and patents, the research results data can be the number of papers published and the number of patent applications. The number of results citations can be understood as the number of citations of research results. When the research results are papers and patents, the number of results citations can be the number of citations of papers and the number of citations of patents.

[0078] In an optional embodiment, the weighted sum of the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the target field may be used as a basis for determining the first achievement score.

[0079] Exemplarily, the first sum of the number of papers published and the number of patent applications in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated, as well as the second sum of the number of papers published and the number of patent applications in the target field of the area to be evaluated can be determined, and the ratio of the first sum to the second sum is used as the first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field.

[0080] In another optional embodiment, different achievement scores may be determined for different types of research achievement data, and the weighted sum of the achievement scores of different types may be used as the first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field.

[0081] Exemplarily, the number of papers published in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated and the number of papers published in the target field and their ratio can be used as the achievement score under the paper type (also known as the paper activity index); the number of patent applications in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated and the number of patent applications in the target field of the area to be evaluated can be used as the achievement score under the patent type (also known as the patent activity index); and the weighted sum of the achievement score under the paper type and the achievement score under the patent type can be used as the first achievement score under the sub-field of the area to be evaluated.

[0082] For example, for any sub-field, the paper activity index of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field can be determined based on the following formula:

[0083] ;

[0084] Where PPAI ij T is the paper activity index of the area j to be evaluated in the sub-field i within the preset historical period; ij is the number of papers published in sub-field i in the area j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; nt is the number of sub-fields under the target field.

[0085] The patent activity index of the region to be evaluated in this sub-field can be determined based on the following formula:

[0086] ;

[0087] In the formula, PTAI ij AP is the patent activity index of the region j to be evaluated in the preset historical period under sub-field i; ij is the number of patent applications published in sub-field i in the area j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; nt is the number of sub-fields under the target field.

[0088] S220, determining a second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0089] In an optional embodiment, the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of research achievements in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated can be used as the first achievement impact parameter; the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of research achievements in the target field of the area to be evaluated can be used as the second achievement impact parameter; the ratio of the first achievement impact parameter to the second achievement impact parameter can be used as the second achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0090] For example, for any sub-field, the paper influence index of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field can be determined based on the following formula:

[0091] ;

[0092] In the formula, PPCI ij T is the paper influence index of the area j to be evaluated in the sub-field i within the preset historical period; ij is the number of papers published in sub-field i in the region j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; CT ij is the number of citations of papers in sub-field i in the area j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; nt is the number of sub-fields under the target field.

[0093] S230, determining the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the first achievement scores and / or the second achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0094] Exemplarily, in this embodiment, the weighted sum of the first achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields can be used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field; or, the weighted sum of the second achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields can be used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field; or, the weighted sum of the first achievement scores and the second achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields can be used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0095] Among them, the weight coefficients corresponding to different achievement scores can be determined based on manual experience, or through a large number of experiments, or can be set by the user according to user needs. This application does not impose any restrictions on this.

[0096] In the above embodiment, a specific implementation method is given for determining the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field when the research achievement data includes the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations, so that the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is more referenceable and the determination of the research achievement score is reasonable and well-founded.

[0097] Based on the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment. In this optional embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations; in this case, the process of determining the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field is refined.

[0098] See also Figure 3 The steps shown to determine the basic outcome score include:

[0099] S310, determining the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0100] Among them, the number of authorized results usually refers to the number of patent authorizations, and the third result score can be understood as the patent influence index.

[0101] Exemplarily, in this embodiment, the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated can be used as the third achievement impact parameter; the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the target field of the area to be evaluated can be used as the fourth achievement impact parameter; the ratio of the third achievement impact parameter to the fourth achievement impact parameter can be used as the third achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0102] For example, for any sub-field, the patent influence index of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field can be determined based on the following formula:

[0103] ;

[0104] In the formula, PTCI ij is the patent influence index of the region j to be evaluated in the sub-field i during the preset historical period; CP ij RP is the number of patent citations in sub-field i in the region j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; ij is the number of patent authorizations in sub-field i in the area j to be evaluated within the preset historical period; nt is the number of sub-fields under the target field.

[0105] S320, determining the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the third achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0106] Illustratively, in this embodiment, the weighted sum of the third achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields can be used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0107] In order to make the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field better reflect the actual research achievements, in some embodiments, the weighted sum of the first achievement score, the second achievement score and the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields can be used as the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field.

[0108] Among them, the weight coefficients corresponding to different achievement scores can be determined based on manual experience, or through a large number of experiments, or can be set by the user according to user needs. This application does not impose any restrictions on this.

[0109] In the above embodiment, a specific implementation method for determining the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is given when the research achievement data includes the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations, so that the method of determining the research achievement score is more diverse.

[0110] Based on the above content, it can be known that the research achievement score is usually expressed in the form of a score. In the process of comparing the research achievement scores of different areas to be evaluated, the score comparison may be unintuitive. Based on this, in some embodiments, the research achievement score of each area to be evaluated can be divided into percentages.

[0111] For example, after determining the research achievement scores of each area to be evaluated, the highest research achievement score can be set to 100, and the scores of other research achievements can be adjusted according to the gaps between the scores of different research achievements. For example, the scores of different research achievements can be standardized based on the Gordon scoring model, so that the comparison of the scores of research achievements of different areas to be evaluated is more intuitive.

[0112] Based on the technical solutions of the above-mentioned embodiments, the present application also provides a basis for evaluating the degree of technical differences. This evaluation basis can be used as a fourth achievement score, together with at least one of the first achievement score, the second achievement score and the third achievement score, to determine the research achievement score; this evaluation basis can also be used alone as a method for evaluating the degree of technical differences, that is, according to the following evaluation basis, determine the degree of technical differences between different areas to be evaluated.

[0113] For example, the research results data of different areas to be evaluated in two historical periods can be obtained, and for any area to be evaluated, the quantitative ratio of the research results data in the two historical periods can be determined, and then the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated can be determined based on the quantitative ratio of different areas to be evaluated.

[0114] Among them, in order to make the assessment of the degree of technological differences more practical, under normal circumstances, the relationship between the above two historical periods should meet the following requirements (taking the above two historical periods including the first historical period and the second historical period as an example): 1. The second historical period includes the first historical period; 2. The end time of the first historical period and the second historical period is the same. Taking the first historical period from 2020 to 2024 as an example, the second historical period is any year before 2020 to 2024.

[0115] Taking the example that the area to be evaluated includes area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated, the research results data of area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated in the first historical period and the second historical period can be obtained, and the ratios of area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated corresponding to the first historical period to the second historical period can be determined respectively. According to the relationship between the two ratios, the degree of technical difference between area A to be evaluated and area B to be evaluated is determined.

[0116] It can be understood that the larger the ratio is, the faster the development of the area to be evaluated is in the near future. For example, if the ratio of area A to be evaluated is greater than that of area B to be evaluated, it is determined that the technology development of area A to be evaluated is better, that is, there is a technology difference between area B to be evaluated and area A to be evaluated, and the larger the difference between the two ratios is, the greater the degree of technology difference between the two areas is.

[0117] Based on the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment. In this optional embodiment, the steps after determining the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field are introduced.

[0118] See also Figure 4 The steps for determining the research plan shown include:

[0119] S410, for any area to be evaluated, a research plan is formulated for the area to be evaluated according to the degree of technical difference between the area to be evaluated and other areas to be evaluated in the target field.

[0120] Among them, the research plan is the research plan in the target field.

[0121] Exemplarily, different degrees of technical difference correspond to different research plans. In this embodiment, the correspondence between the degree of technical difference and the research plan can be determined in advance, and the research plan corresponding to the area to be evaluated can be determined based on the degree of technical difference between the area to be evaluated and other areas to be evaluated in the target field and the above correspondence.

[0122] Exemplarily, the degree of technical difference between the area to be evaluated and other areas to be evaluated in the target field can be input into a pre-trained plan determination model to obtain a research plan corresponding to the area to be evaluated.

[0123] It is understandable that different areas to be evaluated have different development plans. Therefore, the research plan formulated for the area to be evaluated in this embodiment is for reference only. During actual use, it can be adjusted and modified based on user needs to match the research plan with the local development plan.

[0124] In the above embodiment, a specific method for formulating a research plan for the area to be evaluated according to the degree of technological difference is provided, so that the method for evaluating the degree of technological difference provided in the present application is closed-loop.

[0125] Based on the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment. In this optional embodiment, the method for evaluating the degree of technical difference provided by the present application is introduced in detail.

[0126] See also Figure 5 The method for assessing the degree of technical differences shown includes:

[0127] S510, obtaining research results data on different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0128] Among them, the research results data include the number of papers published, the number of patent applications, the number of papers cited, the number of patents cited, and the number of patents granted;

[0129] S520, for any area to be evaluated, according to the number of papers published in different sub-fields of the area to be evaluated and the number of papers published in the target field of the area to be evaluated, determine the paper activity index of the area to be evaluated in each sub-field;

[0130] S530, determining the paper influence index of the area to be evaluated in each subfield according to the number of papers published and the number of papers cited in different subfields of the area to be evaluated, and the number of papers published and the number of papers cited in the target field of the area to be evaluated;

[0131] S540, determining the patent activity index of the region to be evaluated in each sub-field according to the number of patent applications in the region to be evaluated in different sub-fields and the number of patent applications in the region to be evaluated in the target field;

[0132] S550, determining the patent influence index of the region to be evaluated in each sub-field according to the number of patent citations and the number of patent authorizations in different sub-fields of the region to be evaluated, as well as the number of patent citations and the number of patent authorizations in the target field of the region to be evaluated;

[0133] S560: Determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the paper activity index, paper influence index, patent activity index and patent influence index of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0134] S570, comparing the research achievement scores of different regions to be evaluated in the target field, and determining the degree of technical difference of different regions to be evaluated in the target field based on the comparison results;

[0135] S580, develop a research plan for each area to be evaluated based on the degree of technological differentiation.

[0136] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments are displayed in sequence according to the indication of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence according to the order indicated by the arrows. Unless there is a clear explanation in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order restriction, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a part of the steps or stages in other steps.

[0137] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides a technology difference degree assessment device for implementing the technology difference degree assessment method involved above. The implementation scheme for solving the problem provided by the device is similar to the implementation scheme recorded in the above method, so the specific limitations in the one or more technology difference degree assessment device embodiments provided below can refer to the limitations of the technology difference degree assessment method above, and will not be repeated here.

[0138] In an exemplary embodiment, Figure 6 As shown, a device for evaluating the degree of technical difference is provided, including: an acquisition module 610, a first determination module 620 and a second determination module 630, wherein:

[0139] An acquisition module 610 is used to acquire research achievement data of different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period;

[0140] The first determination module 620 determines, for any area to be evaluated, a research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in a target field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields;

[0141] The second determination module 630 is used to determine the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field according to the size relationship between the research achievement scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated.

[0142] In one embodiment, the first determination module 620 includes a first determination unit, which is used to determine, for any sub-field, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field; and a second determination unit, which is used to determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field based on the basic achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0143] In one embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations; accordingly, the first determination unit includes a first determination sub-unit, which is used to determine the first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the target field; the second determination sub-unit is used to determine the second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the target field; the third determination sub-unit is used to determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the first achievement score and / or second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0144] In one embodiment, the second determination subunit is specifically used to use the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of research achievements in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated as the first achievement impact parameter; use the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of research achievements in the target field of the area to be evaluated as the second achievement impact parameter; use the ratio of the first achievement impact parameter to the second achievement impact parameter as the second achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0145] In one embodiment, the research achievement data includes the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations; accordingly, the first determination unit includes a fourth determination sub-unit, which is used to determine the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the target field; and the fifth determination sub-unit is used to determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the third achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

[0146] In one embodiment, the fourth determination subunit is specifically used to use the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated as the third achievement impact parameter; use the ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the target field of the area to be evaluated as the fourth achievement impact parameter; use the ratio of the third achievement impact parameter to the fourth achievement impact parameter as the third achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

[0147] In one embodiment, the technology difference degree assessment device further includes a third determination module, which is used to formulate a research plan for any area to be assessed according to the degree of technology difference between the area to be assessed and other areas to be assessed in the target field; the research plan is a research plan for the target field.

[0148] Each module in the above-mentioned technology difference degree assessment device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware and their combination. Each of the above-mentioned modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in the memory in the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each of the above modules.

[0149] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in FIG. Figure 7 As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface, a communication interface, a display unit and an input device. The processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected through a system bus, and the communication interface, the display unit and the input device are connected to the system bus through the input / output interface. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and the external device. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal in a wired or wireless manner, and the wireless manner can be implemented through WIFI, a mobile cellular network, near field communication (NFC) or other technologies. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for evaluating the degree of technical difference is implemented. The display unit of the computer device is used to form a visually visible picture, which can be a display screen, a projection device or a virtual reality imaging device. The display screen can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer device can be a touch layer covering the display screen, or a button, trackball or touchpad set on the computer device shell, or an external keyboard, touchpad or mouse.

[0150] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 7 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0151] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and the processor implements the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments when executing the computer program.

[0152] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments are implemented.

[0153] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, which implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0154] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiments can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to the memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in this application can include at least one of non-volatile memory and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in each embodiment provided in this application may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include distributed databases based on blockchains, etc., but are not limited to this. The processor involved in each embodiment provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, an artificial intelligence (AI) processor, etc., but are not limited to this.

[0155] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this application.

[0156] The above embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present application, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be pointed out that, for a person of ordinary skill in the art, several variations and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the attached claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the degree of technical difference, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtain research results data on different sub-fields of the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period; For any area to be evaluated, determine the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields; The degree of technical difference between the different areas to be evaluated in the target field is determined based on the relationship between the research achievement scores corresponding to the areas to be evaluated.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Determining the research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the different sub-fields includes: For any sub-field, according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field, determine the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field; The research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field is determined according to the basic achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The research achievement data includes the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations; accordingly, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field, including: Determine a first achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the number of research achievements of the area to be evaluated in the target field; Determine a second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the target field; The research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field is determined according to the first achievement scores and / or the second achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that Determining the second achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of research achievements and the number of achievement citations of the area to be evaluated in the target field, comprises: The ratio of the number of citations of achievements in the sub-field to the number of research achievements in the area to be evaluated is used as the first achievement impact parameter; The ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of research achievements in the target field in the area to be evaluated is used as the second achievement impact parameter; The ratio of the first achievement impact parameter to the second achievement impact parameter is used as the second achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The research achievement data includes the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations; accordingly, the basic achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field is determined based on the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field and the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in the target field, including: Determine the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the target field; The research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field is determined according to the third achievement scores of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that Determining the third achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field according to the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the sub-field, and the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations of the area to be evaluated in the target field, includes: The ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the sub-field of the area to be evaluated is used as the third achievement impact parameter; The ratio of the number of achievement citations and the number of achievement authorizations in the target field in the area to be evaluated is used as the fourth achievement impact parameter; The ratio of the third achievement impact parameter to the fourth achievement impact parameter is used as the third achievement score corresponding to the sub-field.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that After determining the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field, the method further includes: For any area to be evaluated, a research plan is formulated for the area to be evaluated according to the degree of technical difference between the area to be evaluated and other areas to be evaluated in the target field; the research plan is a research plan for the target field.

8. A device for evaluating the degree of technical difference, characterized in that: The device comprises: An acquisition module is used to acquire research results data of different sub-fields in the target field in at least two areas to be evaluated within a preset historical period; A first determination module determines, for any area to be evaluated, a research achievement score of the area to be evaluated in the target field according to the research achievement data of the area to be evaluated in different sub-fields; The second determination module is used to determine the degree of technical difference between different areas to be evaluated in the target field according to the size relationship between the research achievement scores corresponding to each area to be evaluated.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images