Method for acquiring and evaluating capacity of waterway transportation and shipping enterprises

Abstract

The invention discloses a waterway transportation and shipping enterprise capability acquisition and evaluation method, which relates to the technical field of evaluation and analysis, and comprises the following steps: S1, a shipping enterprise registers and authenticates in a shipping enterprise management system, and creates enterprise basic information; s2, defining dimensions of assessment indexes in a shipping enterprise management system, and compiling names and codes of assessment items and scores, default values and weights of full-score items; and S3, ship transportation process nodes are set, and assessment index data acquisition is realized. Ship shipping information can be acquired in time, data access of assessment evaluation is supported based on shipping data of the ship, comprehensive data matrix processing is performed according to customized data dimensions in combination with assessment evaluation, and the assessment evaluation accuracy is improved. The phenomenon that the assessment result is inaccurate due to the fact that the score of a single index is abnormal is avoided, and therefore the reasonable and fair management demand of the demand side for the assessment score of the shipping enterprise is met.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of evaluation and analysis, and in particular to a method for collecting and evaluating the capabilities of a waterway transportation and shipping enterprise. Background Art

[0002] As a demander of water transport, in the process of managing water transport shipping companies, it is usually necessary to conduct annual assessment and evaluation of various indicators, and comprehensively evaluate the service capabilities of service providers based on the assessment indicators of various dimensions, as the basis for screening and selecting shipping companies in the second year. At present, the assessment of shipping companies has the following defects and deficiencies:

[0003] 1. Limitations of data acquisition and sharing. The data between manufacturing companies and shipping companies are incompatible and not fully connected, resulting in the inability to share data in a realistic and accurate manner.

[0004] 2. Insufficient digital monitoring capabilities. Although ships can be positioned, there are blind spots in real-time monitoring of cargo, and there is a lack of remote monitoring and fault warning technology for logistics equipment.

[0005] 3. Data analysis and decision support are weak. The large amount of logistics data collected by enterprises is scattered across various departments and systems. There is a lack of effective integration and analysis tools, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of shipping companies.

[0006] 4. The assessment indicators are imperfect. Enterprises focus on cost indicators and ignore service quality and risk control. They may choose shipping companies with low quotations but unstable service levels.

[0007] 5. Subjective factors have a great influence. During the assessment process, the evaluation of some indicators may be subjective and arbitrary, resulting in deviations in the evaluation of shipping companies.

[0008] 6. Lack of dynamic management and feedback mechanism. Enterprises’ assessment of shipping companies is often one-off or periodic, and there is a lack of continuous tracking and dynamic management of shipping companies.

[0009] Based on the above shortcomings, a method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of waterway transport and shipping enterprises is proposed. Summary of the invention

[0010] The purpose of the present invention is to solve the problems in the prior art and to propose a method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of waterway transportation and shipping enterprises.

[0011] A method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of a waterway transport shipping enterprise comprises the following steps:

[0012] S1. Shipping companies register and authenticate in the shipping company management system and create basic company information;

[0013] S2. Define the dimensions of the assessment indicators in the shipping enterprise management system, and write the assessment item names, codes, full score item scores, default values, and weights;

[0014] S3. Set the ship transportation process nodes to obtain the assessment index data;

[0015] S4. Shipping enterprise indicators form the annual shipping enterprise overall assessment summary data according to the custom dimensions, and calculate the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data;

[0016] S5. Rank each shipping company overall according to its comprehensive assessment score;

[0017] S6. According to the overall assessment data of previous years, a secondary comprehensive matrix data processing is carried out for long-term fixed shipping companies, and a secondary repeated calculation is carried out based on the annual data summary to form a ranking of fixed cooperative shipping companies.

[0018] Preferably, in step S1, the basic information of the shipping company includes the company name, registered capital, registered address, business scope, service customers, number of company employees, ships under its jurisdiction, and logistics service level grade.

[0019] Preferably, in step S2, the assessment indicators include:

[0020] (1) Water transport cargo damage rate: Based on the current cargo of the shipping company, the cargo damage amount exceeding the quota / total cargo value is taken as the single cargo damage rate;

[0021] (2) Service score: Based on the evaluation score of the consignee on the transportation service, the total score is calculated based on the three dimensions with a maximum score of 10. If no evaluation is made, the default score is 24.

[0022] (3) Transportation cycle: The transportation time efficiency of the standard ship route is determined based on the transportation route, combined with the reasonable loading and unloading time at the loading and unloading address, and the standard time / actual shipping time is used as the transportation cycle;

[0023] (4) Vessel utilization rate: The vessel utilization rate is calculated based on the number of shipments per month;

[0024] (5) Freight rate stability: Monthly standard prices are set based on the ship + route method. When the freight rate is 1% higher than the current standard price, 1 point is reduced; when it is lower than 1%, 1 point is increased. The default is 5 points.

[0025] (6) Transportation safety: 1 point will be deducted for each cargo damage incident, with a default score of 8 points. If the safety incident is handled to the satisfaction of the customer, 0.5 points will be added.

[0026] (7) Service compliance: The shipowner’s safety awareness and training matters, as well as the response standardization of abnormal risk handling personnel, are scored by the customer as the service compliance data;

[0027] (8) Timeliness of information feedback: The timeliness of information feedback is calculated based on the scores given by the client’s dispatch, finance, sales and other departments;

[0028] (9) Service innovation capability: innovative service evaluation based on shipping costs, service quality, and management methods.

[0029] Preferably, in step S3, setting the ship transportation process nodes includes the shipping company using the system to receive daily shipping tasks, generating a logistics shipping plan according to the logistics shipping order tasks, the shipping company assigning ships, the shipowner receiving the tasks and executing the shipping tasks and delivering the goods to the receiving point.

[0030] Preferably, the step S4, calculating the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data, comprises the following steps:

[0031] (1) First, we determine the set of evaluation indicators U = {u1,u2,…,u n};

[0032] (2) After the transportation is completed, each ship extracts the corresponding evaluation score, which includes the set V = {v1, v2, …, v m};

[0033] (3) In the custom indicator dimension, the weight set of each indicator is included: A = a1, a2, ..., a n},and

[0034] (4) Calculate the comprehensive evaluation, based on the evaluation index set and the evaluation score set, and then form a set R = [r ij] n×m , where r ij Indicates the evaluation index factor u i Rating v j The degree of membership;

[0035] (5) The total score of shipping companies is B = A × R = [b1, b2, …, b m ], where b j is the jth element of the comprehensive evaluation vector, and the calculation formula is:

[0036] (6) According to the calculated set score B, the one with the largest calculated value is taken as the evaluation score: the evaluation result is V k , where k = argmax{b1,b2,…,bm}.

[0037] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:

[0038] 1. The present invention can obtain ship shipping information in a timely manner, and then support the data acquisition of assessment and evaluation based on the ship shipping data, and perform comprehensive data matrix processing according to the custom data dimension in combination with the assessment and evaluation, so as to avoid the phenomenon that the assessment results are inaccurate due to abnormal scores of a single indicator, thereby solving the reasonable and fair management demands of the demand side for the assessment and scoring of shipping companies.

[0039] 2. The present invention obtains system data, customer evaluation data, and weight data of evaluation indicators in real time in multiple dimensions, and combines them with a comprehensive score calculation method to avoid the differentiation of shipping enterprise indicator evaluation caused by the fluctuation of human emotional scores.

[0040] 3. The present invention completes the data closed loop based on the management of shipping companies in terms of data standardization, which can effectively solve the problem of opacity and improve the basis for the control of shipping companies' service quality. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the present invention.

[0042] Figure 2 It is a flow chart of the evaluation and assessment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] In order to make the technical means, creative features, objectives and effects achieved by the present invention easy to understand, the present invention is further explained below in conjunction with specific implementation methods.

[0044] Reference Figure 1-2 As shown, a method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of a waterway transport shipping enterprise comprises the following steps:

[0045] S1. Shipping companies register and authenticate in the shipping company management system, create basic company information, meet the requirements of the company to go online and execute specific business, and lay the foundation for obtaining instant indicator data;

[0046] S2. Define the dimensions of the assessment indicators in the shipping enterprise management system, and write the assessment item names, codes, full score item scores, default values, and weights;

[0047] S3. Set the ship transportation process nodes to obtain the assessment index data;

[0048] S4. Shipping enterprise indicators form the annual shipping enterprise overall assessment summary data according to the custom dimensions, and calculate the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data;

[0049] S5. Rank each shipping company overall according to its comprehensive assessment score;

[0050] S6. According to the overall assessment data of previous years, a secondary comprehensive matrix data processing is carried out for long-term fixed shipping companies, and a secondary repeated calculation is carried out based on the annual data summary to form a ranking of fixed cooperative shipping companies.

[0051] In step S1, the basic information of the shipping company includes the company name, registered capital, registered address, business scope, service customers, number of employees, ships under its jurisdiction, and logistics service level.

[0052] In step S2, the assessment indicators include:

[0053] (1) Water transport cargo damage rate: Based on the current cargo of the shipping company, the cargo damage amount exceeding the quota / total cargo value is taken as the single cargo damage rate;

[0054] (2) Service score: Based on the evaluation score of the consignee on the transportation service, the total score is calculated based on the three dimensions with a maximum score of 10. If no evaluation is made, the default score is 24.

[0055] (3) Transportation cycle: The transportation time efficiency of the standard ship route is determined based on the transportation route, combined with the reasonable loading and unloading time at the loading and unloading address, and the standard time / actual shipping time is used as the transportation cycle;

[0056] (4) Vessel utilization rate: The vessel utilization rate is calculated based on the number of shipments per month;

[0057] (5) Freight rate stability: Monthly standard prices are set based on the ship + route method. When the freight rate is 1% higher than the current standard price, 1 point is reduced; when it is lower than 1%, 1 point is increased. The default is 5 points.

[0058] (6) Transportation safety: 1 point will be deducted for each cargo damage incident, with a default score of 8 points. If the safety incident is handled to the satisfaction of the customer, 0.5 points will be added.

[0059] (7) Service compliance: mainly refers to the shipowner’s safety awareness and training matters, as well as the response standardization of abnormal risk handling personnel. The customer’s score is used as the service compliance data;

[0060] (8) Timeliness of information feedback: The timeliness of information feedback is mainly based on the scores given by the client's dispatch, finance, sales and other departments;

[0061] (9) Service innovation capability: innovative service evaluation based on shipping costs, service quality, and management methods.

[0062] In step S3, setting the ship transportation process nodes includes the shipping company using the system to receive daily shipping tasks, generating logistics shipping plans according to logistics shipping order tasks, the shipping company assigning ships, the shipowner receiving tasks and executing shipping tasks and delivering goods to the receiving point,

[0063] Regarding the timely acquisition of data in the assessment and evaluation of shipping companies, the following are explained:

[0064] (1) In the shipping enterprise management system, it supports APP and PC. The customer (manufacturing enterprise) specifies the specific carrier by issuing an order. The shipping enterprise supports receiving orders through PC login task center, receiving orders through mini program mobile terminal, and quickly connecting to income when SMS and voice reminder orders are not received for more than 5 minutes;

[0065] (2) Timeliness of transportation plan distribution: According to the time of receiving the task and the planned shipment time, the confirmation of the transportation plan dispatch task must be completed before 23:00 the day before shipment by default. Based on the expected pre-processing monitoring, the order will be automatically urged at 22:00, and the expected unprocessed orders will be dynamically upgraded to the level of the processor for intervention;

[0066] (3) During the transportation task, the Beidou positioning and GPS hardware box received by the system automatically trigger the execution status of the waybill, but manual triggering and GPS triggering are treated as different weights for data collection;

[0067] (4) The upload of documents affects the execution of the next shipping task, which is used as a condition to restrict the upload of the expected unprocessed documents of the ship, and the shipping company console will be notified of the expected unprocessed documents. By default, the documents need to be uploaded within 12 hours of the arrival time;

[0068] (5) The timeliness of reconciliation and settlement is mainly based on the accuracy of the reconciliation statement confirmed by the customer and the timeliness of invoicing documents;

[0069] (6) The timeliness of transportation safety data is based on the occurrence of cargo damage incidents, response time, and timeliness of processing results as the basis for assessment.

[0070] The step S4, calculating the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data, comprises the following steps:

[0071] (1) First, we determine the set of evaluation indicators U = {u1,u2,…,u n};

[0072] (2) After the transportation is completed, each ship extracts the corresponding evaluation score, which includes the set V = {v1, v2, …, v m};

[0073] (3) In the custom indicator dimension, the weight set of each indicator is included: A = a1, a2, ..., a n},and

[0074] (4) Calculate the comprehensive evaluation, based on the evaluation index set and the evaluation score set, and then form a set R = [r ij] n×m , where r ij Indicates the evaluation index factor u i Rating v j The degree of membership;

[0075] (5) The total score of shipping companies is B = A × R = [b1, b2, …, b m ], where b j is the jth element of the comprehensive evaluation vector, and the calculation formula is:

[0076] (6) According to the calculated set score B, the one with the largest calculated value is taken as the evaluation score: the evaluation result is V k , where k = argmax{b1,b2,…,b m}.

[0077] The present invention can obtain ship shipping information in a timely manner, and then support the data acquisition of assessment and evaluation based on the ship shipping data, and perform comprehensive data matrix processing according to the user-defined data dimension in combination with the assessment and evaluation, so as to avoid the phenomenon that the assessment results are inaccurate due to abnormal scores of a single indicator, thereby solving the reasonable and fair management demands of the demand side for the assessment and scoring of shipping companies.

[0078] It is known from common technical knowledge that the present invention can be implemented by other embodiments that do not deviate from its spirit or essential features. Therefore, the above disclosed embodiments are only illustrative in all respects and are not exclusive. All changes within the scope of the present invention or within the scope equivalent to the present invention are included in the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for collecting and assessing the capacity of a waterway transport and shipping enterprise, characterized by: The following steps are involved: S1. Shipping companies register and authenticate in the shipping company management system and create basic company information; S2. Define the dimensions of the assessment indicators in the shipping enterprise management system, and write the assessment item name, code, full score item score, default value, and weight; S3. Set the ship transportation process nodes to obtain the assessment index data; S4. Shipping enterprise indicators form the annual shipping enterprise overall assessment summary data according to the custom dimensions, and calculate the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data; S5. Rank each shipping company overall according to its comprehensive assessment score; S6. According to the overall assessment data of previous years, a secondary comprehensive matrix data processing is carried out for long-term fixed shipping companies, and a secondary repeated calculation is carried out based on the annual data summary to form a ranking of fixed cooperative shipping companies.

2. A method for collecting and assessing the capacity of a waterway transport and shipping enterprise according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S1, the basic information of the shipping company includes the company name, registered capital, registered address, business scope, service customers, number of employees, ships under its jurisdiction, and logistics service level.

3. The method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of a waterway transport and shipping enterprise according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S2, the assessment indicators include: (1) Water transport cargo damage rate: Based on the current cargo of the shipping company, the cargo damage amount exceeding the quota / total cargo value is taken as the single cargo damage rate; (2) Service score: Based on the evaluation score of the consignee on the transportation service, the total score is calculated based on the three dimensions with a maximum score of 10. If no evaluation is made, the default score is 24. (3) Transportation cycle: The transportation time efficiency of the standard ship route is determined based on the transportation route, combined with the reasonable loading and unloading time of the loading and unloading address, and the standard time / actual shipping time is used as the transportation cycle; (4) Vessel utilization rate: The vessel utilization rate is calculated based on the number of shipments per month; (5) Freight rate stability: Monthly standard prices are set based on the ship + route method. When the freight rate is 1% higher than the current standard price, 1 point is reduced; when it is lower than 1%, 1 point is increased. The default is 5 points. (6) Transportation safety: 1 point will be deducted for each cargo damage incident, with a default score of 8 points. If the safety incident is handled to the satisfaction of the customer, 0.5 points will be added. (7) Service compliance: The shipowner’s safety awareness and training matters, as well as the response standardization of abnormal risk handling personnel, are scored by the customer as the service compliance data; (8) Timeliness of information feedback: The timeliness of information feedback is calculated based on the scores given by the client’s dispatch, finance, sales and other departments; (9) Service innovation capability: innovative service evaluation based on shipping costs, service quality, and management methods.

4. A method for collecting and assessing the capacity of a waterway transport and shipping enterprise according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step S3, setting the ship transportation process nodes includes the shipping company using the system to receive daily shipping tasks, generating logistics shipping plans according to logistics shipping order tasks, the shipping company assigning ships, the shipowner receiving tasks and executing shipping tasks and delivering goods to the receiving point.

5. A method for collecting and evaluating the capacity of a waterway transport and shipping enterprise according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step S4, calculating the comprehensive assessment score through the assessment summary data, comprises the following steps: (1) First, we determine the set of evaluation indicators U = {u1,u2,…,u n }; (2) After the transportation is completed, each ship extracts the corresponding evaluation score, which includes the set V = {v1, v2, …, v m }; (3) In the custom indicator dimension, the weight set of each indicator is included: A = a1, a2, ..., a n },and (4) Calculate the comprehensive evaluation, based on the evaluation index set and the evaluation score set, and then form a set R = [r ij ] n×m , where r ij Indicates the evaluation index factor u i Rating v j The degree of membership; (5) The total score of shipping companies is B = A × R = [b1, b2, …, b m ], where b j is the jth element of the comprehensive evaluation vector, and the calculation formula is: (6) According to the calculated set score B, the one with the largest calculated value is taken as the evaluation score: the evaluation result is V k , where k = argmax{b1,b2,…,b m }.

Images