Project review method and system and readable storage medium

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a project review method and system and a readable storage medium. The project review method comprises the steps that a part full-amount material list and a corresponding first data review standard are acquired; obtaining a product digital model of the target project; extracting a fixed attribute corresponding to the first identification code matched with the second identification code of the target part from the full-quantity material list of the part as a target fixed attribute; constructing a second data review standard of the target project according to the first data review standard and a review standard item associated with the target fixed attribute; according to the target fixed attribute and the design information, constructing a target design material list of the target project; and examining the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials. According to the method, the efficiency of target design bill of material construction and attribute maintenance can be improved, subsequent project review work can be conveniently carried out, and the project review efficiency is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application belongs to the field of product design, and particularly relates to a project review method, system, and readable storage medium. Background Art

[0002] The Design Bill of Materials (DBOM) is a key document in the product design stage. It details all the parts, components, and subsystems required in the design stage, as well as their interrelationships and attributes. The DBOM ensures that design engineers have comprehensive and accurate material information when creating product designs and is the basis for product development.

[0003] In the related art, usually a part number needs to be applied for separately for each project in the early stage of digital model design and the relevant part attribute information is maintained. After the digital model enters the system management, the DBOM structure and attributes are maintained, and an offline or independent system is used to manage the product data review standard library during data quality review. However, this method still has problems such as the need to repeatedly apply for part numbers for each project, low efficiency in building the BOM structure and maintaining attributes, and inability to be associated with the review standards. Summary of the Invention

[0004] An embodiment of this application provides a project review method to solve the problems in the prior art that when constructing the project BOM, part numbers need to be repeatedly applied for each project, the efficiency of building the BOM structure and maintaining attributes is low, and it cannot be associated with the review standards.

[0005] Correspondingly, an embodiment of this application also provides a project review system and a readable storage medium to ensure the implementation and application of the above method.

[0006] To solve the above problems, an embodiment of this application discloses a project review method, and the method includes:

[0007] Obtain the full-component material list and the corresponding first data review standard. The full-component material list includes the first identification code and fixed attributes corresponding to the components, and the first data review standard includes the first identification code and review standard items;

[0008] Obtain the product digital model of the target project. The product digital model includes the design information and the second identification code corresponding to the target components of the target project;

[0009] Extract the fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that matches the second identification code of the target component from the full-component material list as the target fixed attributes;

[0010] Construct the second data review standard of the target project according to the review standard items associated with the first data review standard and the target fixed attributes;

[0011] Construct a target design bill of materials for the target project according to the target fixed attributes and design information;

[0012] Review the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials.

[0013] Optionally, before obtaining the full bill of materials for components and the corresponding first data review criteria, the method includes:

[0014] Construct a full bill of materials for components including structural levels;

[0015] Construct a first data review criteria corresponding to the structural levels of the full bill of materials for components; the first data review criteria includes review department information and review stage information;

[0016] Associate the fixed attributes in the full bill of materials for components with the corresponding review criteria items in the first data review criteria through a first identification code.

[0017] Optionally, constructing a target design bill of materials for the target project according to the target fixed attributes and design information includes:

[0018] Integrate the target fixed attributes and design information of the target components to generate a target component object;

[0019] Create a target component number for the target component object according to a second identification code and the project-specific code of the target project;

[0020] Construct a target design bill of materials for the target project based on the target component object.

[0021] Optionally, reviewing the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials includes:

[0022] Review the target component object of the target components of the target project according to the second data review criteria;

[0023] Record the design information of the review criteria items in the target component object that do not meet the second data review criteria as target design information;

[0024] Determine a review problem record for the target components according to the target design information;

[0025] Modify the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record, and freeze the product digital model of the target project after the modification.

[0026] Optionally, reviewing the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials further includes:

[0027] Determine the review object according to the target fixed attributes of the target design bill of materials;

[0028] Assign the target design bill of materials and the second data review criteria to the review object, so that the review object reviews the design information of the target design bill of materials according to the second data review criteria.

[0029] Optionally, the review criteria item corresponds to review department information and review stage information. Before reviewing the design information of the target design bill of materials according to the second data review criteria, the method further includes:

[0030] Determine the review department according to the review department information and review stage information of the second data review criteria;

[0031] Determine the reviewers in the review department according to the target fixed attributes of the target component object.

[0032] Optionally, determine the review problem records of the target component according to the target design information, including:

[0033] Record the review problem records in the review criteria item corresponding to the target design information in the second data review criteria; the review problem records include review comments and review snapshots for the target design information;

[0034] Record the spatial position of the target component corresponding to the target design information in the product digital model;

[0035] Associate the review snapshot with the spatial position.

[0036] Optionally, change the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem records, and freeze the product digital model of the target project after the change, including:

[0037] Submit the review problem records to the approval object;

[0038] When receiving the effective instruction from the approval object for the review problem records, change the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem records

[0039] Statistical the problem rectification progress corresponding to each review problem record;

[0040] Statistical the component problem rectification rate corresponding to all review problem records;

[0041] Display the quality problem rectification situation of the product digital model. The quality problem rectification situation of the product digital model includes at least the problem rectification progress and the component problem rectification rate;

[0042] If it is determined that all the target design information changes are completed according to the quality problem rectification situation, freeze the product digital model of the target project after the change.

[0043] The embodiments of the present application also disclose a project review system, including:

[0044] A first acquisition module, configured to acquire a full-component material list and a corresponding first data review standard. The full-component material list includes a first identification code and fixed attributes corresponding to the component, and the first data review standard includes the first identification code and review standard items;

[0045] A second acquisition module, configured to acquire a product digital model of a target project. The product digital model includes design information and a second identification code corresponding to a target component of the target project;

[0046] An extraction module, configured to extract the fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that matches the second identification code of the target component from the full-component material list as target fixed attributes;

[0047] A first construction module, configured to construct a second data review standard of the target project according to the review standard items associated with the target fixed attributes in the first data review standard;

[0048] A second construction module, configured to construct a target design material list of the target project according to the target fixed attributes and design information;

[0049] A review module, configured to review the product digital model according to the target design material list.

[0050] The embodiments of the present application also disclose one or more computer-readable media, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the project review method as described in one or more of the embodiments of the present application is implemented.

[0051] Compared with the prior art, the embodiments of the present application have the following advantages:

[0052] In the embodiments of the present application, a full - quantity material list of components and a corresponding first data review standard are obtained. The full - quantity material list of components includes a first identification code corresponding to the component and fixed attributes, and the first data review standard includes the first identification code and review standard items. A product digital model of a target project is obtained, where the product digital model includes design information and a second identification code corresponding to the target components of the target project. The fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that match the second identification code of the target component are extracted from the full - quantity material list of components as the target fixed attributes. According to the review standard items associated with the target fixed attributes in the first data review standard, a second data review standard for the target project is constructed. According to the target fixed attributes and design information, a target design material list for the target project is constructed, and the product digital model is reviewed according to the target design material list. When building the material lists of different projects, there is no need to repeatedly apply for part numbers for each project. Only the full - quantity material list of components needs to be built and maintained, and the target design material list corresponding to the target project can be extracted according to the identification code, which improves the efficiency of building the structure and maintaining the attributes of the target design material list. In addition, associating the full - quantity material list of components with the first data review standard also facilitates the subsequent project review work and improves the project review efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0053] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the following will briefly introduce the drawings required for the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the following drawings are only some embodiments of the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative efforts.

[0054] Figure 1 is a flowchart of the steps of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0055] Figure 2 is one of the schematic diagrams of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0056] Figure 3 is the second of the schematic diagrams of another embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0057] Figure 4 is the third of the schematic diagrams of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0058] Figure 5 is a flowchart of the steps of another embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0059] Figure 6 is the fourth of the schematic diagrams of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application;

[0060] Figure 7It is the fifth schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application;

[0061] Figure 8 It is the sixth schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application;

[0062] Figure 9 It is the seventh schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application;

[0063] Figure 10 It is the eighth schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application;

[0064] Figure 11 It is the ninth schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application;

[0065] Figure 12 It is the structural schematic diagram of a project review system provided by an embodiment of the present application. Detailed implementation manners

[0066] To make the above objects, features, and advantages of the present application more obvious and understandable, the present application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific implementation manners. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all of them. All other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments of the present application without creative efforts belong to the scope of protection of the present application.

[0067] Figure 1 It is the step flowchart of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application. As Figure 1 shown, the method may include:

[0068] Step 101, obtain the full quantity parts list and the corresponding first data review standard.

[0069] Among them, the full quantity parts list contains the first identification code and fixed attributes corresponding to the parts. The first data review standard contains the first identification code and review standard items. The first identification code corresponding to each part in the full quantity parts list is unique. The parts may include: engine assemblies, sensors, pistons, pumps, etc., which are the materials required for product production. The fixed attributes corresponding to the parts may include: part name, specialty, review engineer, recommended supply information, procurement level, etc. The review standard items of the first data review standard are the review rules for conducting reviews on part data. One part may correspond to one or more review standard items. The first identification code in the first data review standard is set according to the parts targeted by different review standard items. The first data review standard may also contain information such as file number and row-column attributes.

[0070] Step 102: Obtain the product digital model of the target project.

[0071] Among them, the project can be the overall layout and styling design of a whole vehicle, or the engineering design of each assembly such as the engine and chassis. The product digital model is the carrier of the product information corresponding to the project, and includes the functional information, performance information, structural information, part geometric information, assembly information, process and machining information, etc. of the product corresponding to the project.

[0072] The product digital model can be a digital model converted into a lightweight structure, which includes the design information and the second identification code corresponding to the target parts of the target project. The design information corresponding to the target parts of the target project in the product digital model can include management information, geometric information, material information, performance information, structural information, assembly information, etc. The management information can include name, material, design version, etc. The target parts of the target project are the parts to be used in the current project. The second identification code of the target part corresponds to the first identification code of the same part in the full bill of materials of parts.

[0073] Step 103: Extract the fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that match the second identification code of the target part from the full bill of materials of parts as the target fixed attributes;

[0074] According to the second identification code of the target part, the fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that match the second identification code can be extracted from the full bill of materials of parts as the target fixed attributes of the target part.

[0075] The product digital model contains a digital model structure tree. After the product digital model design is completed, through software integration, according to the assemblies, parts, etc. in the digital model structure tree, the target fixed attributes of the target parts can be extracted from the full bill of materials of parts through the first identification code.

[0076] Step 104: Construct the second data review standard of the target project according to the review standard items associated with the target fixed attributes in the first data review standard;

[0077] Both the first data review standard and the full bill of materials of parts contain the first identification code, and the two are associated through the first identification code. The target fixed attributes of the target parts are extracted from the full bill of materials of parts, and at the same time, the corresponding review standard items in the first data review standard can be brought out. Then, the second data review standard of the target project is constructed according to the brought-out review standard items.

[0078] Step 105: Construct the target design bill of materials of the target project according to the target fixed attributes and the design information;

[0079] The target design bill of materials is a key document in the product design phase. It includes the fixed attributes and design information of all materials required during the project implementation, and is the basis for product development. The target design bill of materials for the target project can be constructed based on the target fixed attributes of the target components extracted from the full bill of materials for components and the design information corresponding to the target components of the target project included in the product digital model.

[0080] Step 106, review the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials.

[0081] The target design bill of materials contains the target fixed attributes and design information of the target components, and corresponds to the second data review standard. The product digital model can be reviewed by combining the target design bill of materials with its corresponding second data review standard.

[0082] In the above implementation process, in the case where it is necessary to construct the design bill of materials for one or more projects, it is not necessary to repeatedly apply for and maintain the components of each project. It is only necessary to build and maintain the full bill of materials for components, and extract the corresponding design bill of materials for the current project from it according to the identification code, which improves the efficiency of building the project bill of materials structure and maintaining attributes. In addition, by using the full bill of materials for components and the first identification code included in the first review standard, the corresponding second review standard for the project is brought out while constructing the target project design bill of materials, which also facilitates the subsequent development of project review work and improves the project review efficiency.

[0083] See Figure 2 , the present application also provides a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a project review method. Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, before obtaining the full bill of materials for components and the corresponding first data review standard, the method includes:

[0084] Construct a full bill of materials for components including structural hierarchy;

[0085] Construct a first data review standard corresponding to the structural hierarchy of the full bill of materials for components, where the first data review standard includes review department information and review stage information;

[0086] Associate the fixed attributes in the full bill of materials for components with the corresponding review standard items in the first data review standard through the first identification code.

[0087] In order to obtain the fixed attributes of components and review standard items, it is first necessary to construct a full bill of materials for components and the corresponding first data review standard. The constructed full bill of materials for components contains manufacturing features and structural hierarchy. Refer to Figure 2, the structural levels of the full-component bill of materials can be divided into top level, system, subsystem, assembly, parts, etc. according to the intelligent vehicle platform architecture. Set corresponding numbers for the review standard items in the review standard library, such as vehicle standard 1, assembly standard 2, part standard 3, etc., and then classify and organize them according to the hierarchical structure, specialty, and stage. Duplicate the intelligent vehicle platform architecture, and construct the first data review standard corresponding to the structural levels of the full-component bill of materials based on the review standard items. After constructing the full-component bill of materials and the first data review standard, associate the fixed attributes in the full-component bill of materials with the corresponding review standard items in the first data review standard through the first identification code. So that the corresponding review standard items can be brought out when extracting the fixed attributes of components in the full-component bill of materials.

[0088] Refer to Figure 3 , the present application also provides a second schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method. Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, according to the target fixed attribute and the design information, construct the target design bill of materials of the target project, including:

[0089] Integrate the target fixed attribute and design information of the target component to generate a target component object;

[0090] Create the target part number of the target component object according to the second identification code and the project-specific code of the target project;

[0091] Construct the target design bill of materials of the target project based on the target component object.

[0092] The design bill of materials is the basis of product development. When each target project is in progress, it is necessary to construct and maintain the corresponding target design bill of materials. After obtaining the target fixed attribute and design information of the target component, it can be referred to Figure 3 , integrate the target fixed attribute and design information of the target component to generate the target component object of the target project, and at the same time, the target part number of this target component object can be created in the system. Among them, the target part number is composed of the second identification code and the project-specific code of the target project. It can also be referred to Figure 4, which shows the third schematic diagram of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application. After generating the target component object, the design software structure tree is read, and the target design bill of materials of the target project is formed according to the design software structure tree. Since the target fixed attributes in the target design bill of materials are associated with the corresponding review standard items, the second data review standard can be automatically brought out while forming the target design bill of materials of the target project. In the above implementation process, the target part number of the target component can be automatically created during the construction of the target design bill of materials, and project personnel do not need to process them one by one when constructing the design bills of materials for different projects, which improves the construction efficiency of the project design bill of materials structure.

[0093] Referring to Figure 5 , the present application provides a step flowchart of another embodiment of the project review method. Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, reviewing the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials includes:

[0094] Step 501, reviewing the target component object of the target component of the target project according to the second data review standard;

[0095] Step 502, recording the design information of the review standard items that do not meet the second data review standard in the target component object as the target design information;

[0096] Step 503, determining the review problem record of the target component according to the target design information;

[0097] Step 504, changing the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record, and freezing the product digital model of the target project after the change.

[0098] The system can automatically review the product digital model according to the second data review standard. For example, it can review the target component object of the target component of the target project according to the second data review standard to determine whether there are conventional objective problems in the product digital model. In addition, project managers can also formulate a project-level third data review standard according to the product positioning, associate the review standard items of the third data review standard with the target fixed attributes of the corresponding target components in the target design bill of materials of the target project, conduct independent reviews according to the third data review standard, or conduct reviews by combining the third data review standard with the second data review standard.

[0099] During the review process, if design information of a review standard item that does not meet the second data review standard is found, it can be recorded as target design information, and the component corresponding to the target design information is the component with data quality problems. According to the target design information, a review problem record of the target component can be determined. After determining the review problem record of the target component, the system can change the target design information of the product digital model, or notify relevant technicians to make changes, and can freeze the product digital model of the target project after the changes are completed. The above implementation process realizes the full-chain management of data review standards, design bills of materials, and product digital models.

[0100] Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, when reviewing the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials, it further includes:

[0101] Determine the review object according to the target fixed attribute of the target design bill of materials;

[0102] Allocate the target design bill of materials and the second data review standard to the review object, so that the review object reviews the design information of the target design bill of materials according to the second data review standard.

[0103] Among them, the review object can be a review engineer who reviews project data. In addition to automatically reviewing the product digital model, the system can also allocate review tasks to the corresponding review engineers to conduct reviews on possible complex data problems. Among them, the review engineer information corresponding to each target component is included in the target fixed attribute of the target component. The system can allocate review tasks to the corresponding review objects according to the target fixed attributes. When receiving the review task, the review object will also receive the corresponding target design bill of materials and the data review standard corresponding to the task, and can view the lightweight product digital model corresponding to the target project, and at the same time review the design information of the target design bill of materials in combination with the second data review standard and the target design bill of materials of the target project. The above implementation process can quickly determine the review object and improve the review task allocation efficiency.

[0104] Refer to Figure 6 and Figure 7 , the present application also provides a schematic diagram IV of an embodiment of a project review method and a schematic diagram V of an embodiment of a project review method. Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, the review standard item corresponds to review department information and review stage information. Before reviewing the design information of the target design bill of materials according to the second data review standard, the method further includes:

[0105] Determine the review department according to the review department information and review stage information of the second data review standard;

[0106] Determine the examiner in the examination department according to the target fixed attributes of the target component object.

[0107] Exemplarily, the project manager can determine the project phase and then refer to Figure 6 , the examination tasks can be automatically assigned to the corresponding departments by combining the examination department information and examination phase information in the target project examination criteria. When the examination tasks are assigned to the corresponding departments, the department leaders can also customize the department-level examination criteria in combination with the product positioning and special requirements, and then refer to Figure 7 , and the system assigns them to the corresponding examination engineers. An examination engineer can examine the design information of the target components of one or more target projects. The above implementation process can achieve the hierarchical assignment of examination tasks from top to bottom according to the second data examination criteria and the target fixed attributes of the target component object, accurately assign the examination tasks to the corresponding departments and corresponding examiners, and improve the accuracy and efficiency of examination task assignment.

[0108] Refer to Figure 8 , the present application also provides a schematic diagram VI of an embodiment of a project examination method. Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, determining the examination problem record of the target component according to the target design information includes:

[0109] Record the examination problem record in the examination criterion item corresponding to the second data examination criterion and the target design information; the examination problem record includes the examination annotation and examination snapshot for the target design information;

[0110] Record the spatial position of the target component corresponding to the target design information in the product digital model;

[0111] Associate the examination snapshot with the spatial position.

[0112] Among them, the review comments of the target design information may include the serial number, the target part number corresponding to the target design information, the corresponding target part name, the corresponding review standard item, and the problem description. The review snapshot of the target design information may be a snapshot of the target part corresponding to the target design information at the corresponding position in the digital model. In the snapshot, the specific digital model positions with data quality problems can be framed with a marked box, and a simple text description of the corresponding problem can be added beside the marked box. Recording the spatial position of the target part corresponding to the target design information in the product digital model and associating it with the review snapshot can quickly locate the digital model position corresponding to the data quality problem through the review snapshot during the review or rectification process. The above implementation process can synchronously display the product digital model and the corresponding data review criteria online, quickly form problems through the corresponding review standard items, and automatically save the problem photos. During the review process, the review object does not need to compare the product digital model with the review criteria in different systems, record the review information by manually taking screenshots and saving them and then uploading them.

[0113] When the system conducts a routine problem review, it can generate corresponding review problem records after determining the target design information. If a review engineer discovers a data quality problem during the review process and determines the target design information, he can record the review problem record by clicking the "Problem Record Button". Exemplarily, refer to Figure 8, when the review engineer discovers a quality problem with a certain part during the review process, they can record the corresponding review problem by clicking the "Problem Record Button". For example, when reviewing the part numbered DSYS001301 and finding that it has a data quality problem, the review engineer can click the "Problem Record Button" to fill in the review problem record, record the serial number as 1, the corresponding part / assembly number, which is the target part number corresponding to the target design information, as DSYS001301, the corresponding part / assembly name, which is the target part name, as Power System, the corresponding review standard is no interference between parts, the problem description is recorded as part interference, and the corresponding review snapshot is saved. If the review engineer does not discover a quality problem with the part being reviewed during the review process, they can also click the "Problem Record Button" to fill in the corresponding review problem record to retain the review trace. For example, when reviewing the part numbered DSYS001302 and confirming that it has no data quality problem, the serial number can be recorded as 2 in the review problem record, the corresponding part / assembly number, which is the target part number, as DSYS001302, the corresponding part / assembly name, which is the target part name, as Chassis System, the corresponding review standard is no interference between parts, the problem description is recorded as none, and the review snapshot can be left blank. Exemplarily, the review problem record can also be associated with the target design bill of materials DBOM through the target part number. When the reviewer selects the target part in the DBOM, the system interface can display the review problem record corresponding to the selected target part. When viewing the review problem record, the corresponding problem picture will be displayed in the digital model interface and point to the location of the corresponding target part. The system can also be integrated with common simulation software to manage the review problem records of other simulation software.

[0114] Optionally, in an embodiment of the present application, changing the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record and freezing the product digital model of the target project after the change includes:

[0115] Submitting the review problem record to the approval object;

[0116] After receiving the effective instruction of the approval object for the review problem record, changing the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record;

[0117] Statistical the problem improvement progress corresponding to each review problem record;

[0118] Statistical the parts problem rectification rate corresponding to all the review problem records;

[0119] Display the rectification situation of the quality problems of the product digital model, where the rectification situation of the quality problems of the product digital model at least includes the rectification progress of the problems and the rectification rate of the component problems;

[0120] If it is determined that all the target design information changes are completed according to the rectification situation of the quality problems, freeze the product digital model of the target project after the changes are completed.

[0121] After recording the review problem record, it can be submitted to the approval object, and the approval object organizes the review and signature of the review problem record. The corresponding review problem record will only take effect after the review and signature are passed. Refer to Figure 9 Shown in FIG. 7 of the schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application, for the review problem record being approved, when clicking on the review standard item corresponding to the review problem record, a prompt message of "In process of process joint signature" can be displayed. Among them, after the review problem record takes effect, it is saved in the review standard item corresponding to the target design information. The first data review standard contains the reference times information and historical problem records of the review standard item. Whenever a review problem record takes effect, according to the review standard item number corresponding to the target design information in the review annotation, increment the reference times of this item by one in the first data review standard, and save the problem description in the review annotation as a historical problem record. Refer to Figure 10 Shown in FIG. 8 of the schematic diagram of an embodiment of the project review method of the present application, the reference times and historical problem records of each review standard item can be queried in the first data review standard. For example, when clicking on Standard 1, the following content can be displayed: Referenced n times; Record XX problem... Among them, n can be any integer, and XX represents the problem content.

[0122] After receiving the effective instruction recorded by the approval object for the review problem record, problem rectification can be carried out accordingly. Among them, the problem rectification can be to change the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record. After the problem rectification is completed, the corresponding review problem record can be closed. According to the closing situation of the review problems, the problem rectification progress corresponding to each review problem record and the component problem rectification rate corresponding to all review problem records can be counted, and the quality problem rectification situation of the product digital model obtained by the statistics can be displayed on the relevant interface. The system supports freezing of the product digital model. If it is determined according to the quality problem rectification situation that all the target design information has been changed, the product digital model of the target project after the change can be frozen in the system. Among them, when it is detected that the problem rectification progress corresponding to each review problem record and the component problem rectification rate corresponding to all review problem records both reach 100%, it can be determined that all the target design information has been changed. If the quality problem rectification is not completed, the product digital model freezing process cannot be initiated. After the product digital model is frozen, a freezing status identifier can be added to the target design bill of materials of the corresponding target project. The above implementation process enables the relevant personnel of the project to intuitively understand the problem rectification situation corresponding to the project, and associates the digital model freezing with the data quality of the project, ensuring that there are no data quality problems in the frozen digital model.

[0123] Referring to Figure 11 , the present application also provides a schematic diagram IX of an embodiment of a project review method of the present application. In an embodiment of the present application, a maintenance reminder can also be pushed to the maintenance object. Among them, the maintenance object can be a standard maintenance engineer, referring to Figure 11, it is possible to monitor the reference count of the review criterion items in the first data review criterion and the time since the historical problem record was last updated. When it is detected that there is a review criterion item in the first data review criterion with a reference count less than the specified count or a time since the historical problem record was last updated exceeding the specified time, a maintenance reminder can be pushed to the standard maintenance engineer, suggesting that the maintenance engineer cancel the corresponding review criterion item. For example, when it is detected that the above situation exists for the corresponding standard 4 of subsystem 2, it can be deleted. When it is detected that there is a review criterion item in the first data review criterion with a reference count exceeding the specified count, a maintenance reminder can be pushed to the standard maintenance engineer, suggesting that the maintenance engineer add the corresponding review criterion item as a long-term review criterion item. For example, when it is detected that the reference count of standard 4 for part 2 of IA assembly 1 exceeds the specified count, it can be upgraded to a long-term review criterion item. Additionally, it is also possible to monitor whether there are any additions or deletions of components in the full-component bill of materials. When it is detected that there are additions or deletions of components in the full-component bill of materials, a maintenance reminder can be pushed to the standard maintenance engineer, suggesting that the maintenance engineer add or delete the review criterion items, identification codes, review department information, review stage information, etc. for the corresponding components in the first data review criterion, and at the same time, correspondingly remind the maintenance of the review criteria for the upper-level components such as the corresponding assemblies. Exemplarily, under the condition that part 4 is added to the full-component bill of materials, the corresponding review criterion item for part 4 is added to the first review criterion and its corresponding structural level and associated with its fixed attributes, and the first data review criterion is updated. Under the condition that part 1 of IA assembly 2 is deleted from the full-component bill of materials, all its corresponding review criterion items can be deleted. Through the above implementation process, the update and maintenance of the data review criterion can be well achieved.

[0124] Based on the above embodiments, the present embodiment further provides a project review system, which is applied to electronic devices such as terminal devices and servers.

[0125] Referring to Figure 12 , a structural block diagram of an embodiment of a project review system of the present application is shown, which may specifically include the following modules:

[0126] The first acquisition module 1201 is configured to acquire the full-component bill of materials of components and the corresponding first data review criterion, where the full-component bill of materials of components includes the first identification code and fixed attributes corresponding to the components, and the first data review criterion includes the first identification code and review criterion items;

[0127] The second acquisition module 1202 is configured to acquire the product digital model of the target project, where the product digital model includes the design information and the second identification code corresponding to the target components of the target project;

[0128] An extraction module 1203 is configured to extract, from the full bill of materials of the components, the fixed attributes corresponding to the first identification code that match the second identification code of the target component as the target fixed attributes;

[0129] A first construction module 1204 is configured to construct a second data review criterion for the target item according to the review criterion items associated with the target fixed attributes and the first data review criterion;

[0130] A second construction module 1205 is configured to construct a target design bill of materials for the target item according to the target fixed attributes and the design information;

[0131] A review module 1206 is configured to review the product digital model according to the target design bill of materials.

[0132] For the above system embodiment, since it is basically similar to the project review method embodiment, the relevant parts can be referred to the partial description of the method embodiment.

[0133] A project review system provided by an embodiment of the present invention can, when it is necessary to construct a design bill of materials for one or more projects, avoid repeatedly applying for and maintaining the components of each project. It only needs to set up and maintain the full bill of materials of the components, and extract the corresponding design bill of materials for the current project from it according to the identification code, which improves the efficiency of building the project bill of materials structure and attribute maintenance. In addition, by using the full bill of materials of the components and the first identification code included in the first review criterion, the corresponding second review criterion for the project is brought out while constructing the project bill of materials, which also facilitates the subsequent development of the project review work and improves the project review efficiency.

[0134] An embodiment of the present application also provides one or more machine-readable media, on which instructions are stored. When executed by one or more processors, the instructions cause an electronic device to execute the project review method as described in one or more of the above embodiments. In an embodiment of the present application, the electronic device includes various types of devices such as a terminal device and a server (cluster).

[0135] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner. Each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. The same or similar parts among the embodiments can be referred to each other.

[0136] Embodiments of the present application are described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, terminal devices (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowchart and / or block diagram, and the combination of processes and / or blocks in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to the processors of general-purpose computers, special-purpose computers, embedded processors, or other programmable item review terminal devices to generate a machine, such that the instructions executed by the processors of the computer or other programmable item review terminal devices generate means for implementing the functions specified in one process Figure 1 one process or multiple processes and / or blocks Figure 1 or in multiple blocks.

[0137] These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable item review terminal device to work in a specific manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory generate a manufactured article including instruction means that implement the functions specified in one process Figure 1 one process or multiple processes and / or blocks Figure 1 or in multiple blocks.

[0138] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable item review terminal device, such that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable terminal device to generate a computer-implemented process, so that the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable terminal device provide steps for implementing the functions specified in one process Figure 1 one process or multiple processes and / or blocks Figure 1 or in multiple blocks.

[0139] Although the preferred embodiments of the embodiments of the present application have been described, those skilled in the art can make additional changes and modifications once they learn the basic creative concepts. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be construed to include the preferred embodiments and all changes and modifications falling within the scope of the embodiments of the present application.

[0140] Finally, it should also be noted that in this text, relational terms such as first and second are only used to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the term "comprising", "including" or any other variant thereof is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, article or terminal device comprising a series of elements not only includes those elements, but also includes other elements not expressly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, article or terminal device. Without further limitation, an element defined by the statement "comprising an..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article or terminal device comprising the said element.

[0141] The above has introduced in detail a project review method and apparatus, an electronic device and a storage medium provided by the present application. Specific examples are used in this text to elaborate on the principle and implementation manner of the present application. The description of the above embodiments is only used to help understand the method and its core idea of the present application; at the same time, for those of ordinary skill in the art, according to the idea of the present application, there will be changes in the specific implementation manner and application scope. In summary, the content of this specification should not be construed as a limitation to the present application.

Claims

1. A project review method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining a full bill of materials for a component and a corresponding first data review standard, wherein the full bill of materials for a component includes a first identification code and a fixed attribute corresponding to the component, and the first data review standard includes the first identification code and a review standard item; Acquire a product digital model of a target project, wherein the product digital model includes design information and a second identification code corresponding to a target component of the target project; Extracting, from the full bill of materials of the component, the fixed attribute corresponding to the first identification code that matches the second identification code of the target component as the target fixed attribute; constructing a second data review standard for the target item according to the review standard item associated with the first data review standard and the target fixed attribute; Constructing a target design material bill of the target project according to the target fixed attributes and the design information; The product digital model is reviewed against the target design bill of materials.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Before obtaining the full bill of materials of the parts and the corresponding first data review standard, the method includes: Build a complete bill of materials including structural level components; Constructing a first data review standard corresponding to the structural level of the full bill of materials of the parts; the first data review standard includes review department information and review stage information; The fixed attributes in the full bill of materials of the parts are associated with the corresponding review standard items in the first data review standard through the first identification code.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Constructing a target design material bill of the target project according to the target fixed attribute and the design information, including: Integrating target fixed attributes and design information of the target component to generate a target component object; Creating a target part number of the target part object according to the second identification code and the project-specific code of the target project; A target design bill of materials for the target project is constructed based on the target component objects.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Review the product digital model against the target design bill of materials, including: Reviewing a target component object of a target component of the target project according to the second data review standard; Recording the design information of the review standard items in the target component object that do not meet the second data review standard as target design information; Determine the review problem record of the target component according to the target design information; The target design information of the product digital model is modified according to the review problem record, and the product digital model of the target project after the modification is frozen.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Reviewing the product digital model against the target design bill of materials, including: Determining a review object according to the target fixed attribute of the target design material list; The target design BOM and the second data review standard are assigned to the review object, so that the review object reviews the design information of the target design BOM according to the second data review standard.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The review standard item corresponds to review department information and review stage information. Before reviewing the design information of the target design bill of materials according to the second data review standard, the method further includes: Determine the review department according to the review department information and review stage information of the second data review standard; The reviewer in the review department is determined according to the target fixed attribute of the target component object.

7. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Determining the review problem record of the target component according to the target design information includes: Recording a review problem record in the review standard item corresponding to the second data review standard and the target design information; the review problem record includes a review annotation and a review snapshot for the target design information; Recording the spatial position of the target component corresponding to the target design information in the product digital model; The review snapshot is associated with the spatial location.

8. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Modifying the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record, and freezing the product digital model of the target project after the modification, including: Submit the review question record to the approval object; After receiving the approval object's effective instruction for the review problem record, modify the target design information of the product digital model according to the review problem record Count the progress of rectification of each review problem record; Count the component problem rectification rates corresponding to all the review problem records; Displaying the rectification status of the quality problems of the digital model of the product, wherein the rectification status of the quality problems of the digital model of the product at least includes the rectification progress of the problems and the rectification rate of the parts problems; If it is determined that all the target design information has been changed based on the rectification of the quality issues, the product digital model of the target project after the changes is frozen.

9. A project review system, characterized in that: include: A first acquisition module is used to acquire a full bill of materials for a component and a corresponding first data review standard, wherein the full bill of materials for a component includes a first identification code and a fixed attribute corresponding to the component, and the first data review standard includes the first identification code and a review standard item; A second acquisition module is used to acquire a product digital model of a target project, wherein the product digital model includes design information and a second identification code corresponding to a target component of the target project; An extraction module, configured to extract, from the full bill of materials of the component, a fixed attribute corresponding to the first identification code that matches the second identification code of the target component as a target fixed attribute; A first construction module, configured to construct a second data review standard for the target item according to the review standard item associated with the first data review standard and the target fixed attribute; A second construction module is used to construct a target design material list of the target project according to the target fixed attribute and the design information; A review module is used to review the product digital model according to the target design material list.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the project review method as described in any one of method claims 1-8 is implemented.

Images