Sports facility comprehensive evaluation management method and system

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of facility management, in particular to a comprehensive assessment management method and system for sports facilities. A sports facility comprehensive evaluation management method comprises the following steps: S1, obtaining related matching data in each sports facility deployment area, and obtaining the area facility matching degree of each sports facility by using a fitness formula according to the related matching data; s2, taking the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as to-be-allocated sports facilities according to the area facility matching degree, and obtaining replacement values of the sports facilities in the deployment area by using a replacement formula; and S3, according to the replacement values of the sports facilities in the deployment area, taking the sports facilities with the replacement values greater than or equal to a second preset threshold value in the deployment area as to-be-replaced sports facilities. The matching evaluation of the sports facilities is carried out by combining the oxygen content and the environment adaptation degree, the facilities can be ensured to be suitable for sports facility management in the high altitude area, and the facilities are adjusted by combining the age change of population in the deployment area.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of facility management, and particularly to a comprehensive evaluation management method and system for sports facilities. Background Art

[0002] The reasonable allocation of sports facilities is of great significance for improving the sports experience, ensuring sports safety, and optimizing resource utilization. At present, the layout and replacement of sports facilities usually rely on fixed years or manual inspections, lacking scientific quantitative analysis methods, which may lead to a mismatch between facility deployment and actual needs. In addition, the applicability of sports facilities is affected by various environmental factors, and there are significant differences in facility requirements in different regions. Without a reasonable evaluation mechanism, it may affect the use effect and management efficiency of facilities; at the same time, when sports facilities are in an oxygen-deficient environment in the plateau area, the use of different sports facilities will be restricted. At the same time, according to the change of the population age in the sports facility deployment area, such as the phenomenon of aging, etc., the sports facilities need to be adjusted. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In order to overcome the disadvantage of being difficult to adapt to special environmental conditions, the present invention provides a comprehensive evaluation management method and system for sports facilities.

[0004] The technical implementation plan of the present invention is: a comprehensive evaluation management method for sports facilities, including the following steps:

[0005] S1: Obtain relevant matching data within the deployment area of each sports facility, and use the fitness formula according to the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility;

[0006] S2: Take the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as the sports facilities to be allocated according to the regional facility matching degree, and use the replacement formula to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities within the deployment area;

[0007] S3: Take the sports facilities within the deployment area with a replacement value greater than or equal to the second preset threshold as the sports facilities to be replaced according to the replacement value of the sports facilities within the deployment area;

[0008] S4: Obtain the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated, use the adaptation adjustment formula according to the adjustment data to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation value.

[0009] Preferably, obtaining relevant matching data within the deployment areas of each sports facility, and using a fitness formula based on the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degrees of each sports facility, includes: obtaining relevant matching data within the deployment areas of each sports facility, where the relevant matching data includes the oxygen content within the deployment area, standard atmospheric oxygen, and the exercise amount data of each person within the deployment area, and inputting the relevant matching data and the standard exercise amount data of each sports facility into the fitness formula to obtain the regional facility matching degrees of each sports facility.

[0010] Preferably, inputting the relevant matching data and the standard exercise amount data of each sports facility into the fitness formula to obtain the regional facility matching degrees of each sports facility, includes: where the fitness formula is:

[0011]

[0012] In the formula, K is the regional facility matching degree of the sports facility; ω i is the weight adjustment value of the i-th person within the deployment area; v, ∈ are adjustment coefficients; N is the total number of people within the deployment area; A i is the actual exercise amount of the i-th person within the deployment area; A 0 is the standard exercise amount for using each sports facility; μ is the average exercise amount of all people within the deployment area; K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area.

[0013] Preferably, the K 1 being the environmental matching value of the deployment area, includes: obtaining the environmental matching value of the deployment area using an environmental matching formula, where the environmental matching formula is:

[0014]

[0015] In the formula, K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area; O p is the oxygen content within the deployment area; O pl is the standard atmospheric oxygen, and γ is a smoothing control parameter.

[0016] Preferably, taking the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as the sports facilities to be allocated according to the regional facility matching degrees, and using a replacement formula to obtain the replacement values of the sports facilities within the deployment area, includes: taking the sports facilities with regional facility matching degrees greater than or equal to a first preset threshold as the sports facilities to be allocated, obtaining the standard adaptation age data of each sports facility within the deployment area, the average age data of the people within the deployment area, and the damage degree of the sports facilities within the deployment area, and using the replacement formula to obtain the replacement values of the sports facilities within the deployment area, and replacing the sports facilities with replacement values greater than or equal to a second preset threshold.

[0017] Preferably, the replacement value of sports facilities in the deployment area is obtained by using a replacement formula, and the sports facilities with the replacement value greater than or equal to the second preset threshold are replaced, including: The replacement formula is as follows:

[0018]

[0019] In the formula, T is the replacement value of the target sports facility; α 1 、α 2 、α 3 are weight adjustment factors; is the average age of the personnel in the deployment area; AG 0 is the standard preset age; d is the damage degree of the target sports facility; m is the standard adaptation age data of the target sports facility; is the average standard adaptation age data of other sports facilities within the preset range of the target sports facility.

[0020] Preferably, the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated is obtained, and according to the adjustment data, an adaptation adjustment formula is used to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the sports facilities to be replaced are replaced according to the adaptation value, including: When the replacement value of the target sports facility is greater than or equal to the second preset threshold, the target sports facility is used as the sports facility to be replaced, and the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated is obtained. The adjustment data includes the standard adaptation age data of the sports facilities to be allocated, the maintenance cost of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the environmental adaptation degree data of the sports facilities to be allocated. According to the adjustment data, the adaptation adjustment formula is used for the sports facilities to be allocated respectively to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the sports facility with the largest adaptation value replaces the sports facility to be replaced.

[0021] Preferably, according to the adjustment data, the adaptation adjustment formula is used for the sports facilities to be allocated respectively to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, including: The adaptation adjustment formula is as follows:

[0022]

[0023] In the formula, S is the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; S 1 is the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; cost is the maintenance cost of the sports facilities to be allocated; en is the environmental adaptation degree between the environment where the target sports facility is located and the best use environment of the sports facilities to be allocated.

[0024] Preferably, the S 1 is the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, including: The age adaptation value formula is used to obtain the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the age adaptation value formula is as follows:

[0025]

[0026] AG g is the standard adaptation age data for the sports facilities to be allocated; is the average age of the people in the deployment area; AG 0 is the standard preset age.

[0027] Preferably, a comprehensive evaluation management system for sports facilities includes:

[0028] A data collection module, configured to obtain relevant matching data in the deployment area, the standard adaptation age data of each sports facility in the deployment area, the average age data of the people in the deployment area, the damage degree of the sports facilities in the deployment area, and the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated;

[0029] A regional facility matching degree calculation module, configured to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility according to the relevant matching data using a fitness formula;

[0030] An environment matching value calculation module, configured to obtain the environment matching value of the deployment area using an environment matching formula;

[0031] A sports facility to be allocated acquisition module, which takes the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as the sports facilities to be allocated according to the regional facility matching degree;

[0032] A replacement value calculation module, configured to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area using a replacement formula;

[0033] A sports facility to be replaced acquisition module, which takes the sports facilities in the deployment area with a replacement value greater than or equal to a second preset threshold as the sports facilities to be replaced according to the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area;

[0034] An adaptation value acquisition module, configured to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated respectively using an adaptation adjustment formula according to the adjustment data;

[0035] A replacement module, configured to replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated.

[0036] The beneficial effects are:

[0037] 1. By combining the oxygen content and the environmental adaptation degree, the present invention evaluates the matching of sports facilities, and comprehensively considers the exercise amount data of people using a fitness formula, ensuring that the facilities can adapt to specific environmental conditions, improving the exercise safety and comfort of users, and is particularly suitable for the management of sports facilities in high-altitude areas;

[0038] 2. The present invention calculates the replacement value of sports facilities by using a replacement formula, comprehensively considering the damage degree of sports facilities, the suitable age, and the deployment safety of sports facilities, and reduces the potential safety hazards caused by arranging young sports facilities near aging sports facilities.

[0039] 3. The present invention calculates the adaptation value of candidate facilities by using an adaptation adjustment formula, and comprehensively considers the maintenance cost, environmental adaptability, and age adaptation factors when replacing sports facilities, so that the new facilities can better adapt to the current environmental conditions. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0040] Figure 1 is a flowchart of the comprehensive evaluation management method for sports facilities of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 is a schematic structural diagram of the comprehensive evaluation management system for sports facilities of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0042] Next, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

[0043] Embodiment 1: A comprehensive evaluation management method for sports facilities, as Figure 1 shown, includes the following steps:

[0044] S1: Obtain relevant matching data within the deployment area of each sports facility, and use the fitness formula according to the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility.

[0045] Obtain relevant matching data within the deployment area of each sports facility. The relevant matching data includes the oxygen content in the deployment area, the standard atmospheric oxygen, and the exercise amount data of each person in the deployment area. Input the relevant matching data and the standard exercise amount data of each sports facility into the fitness formula to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility.

[0046] It should be noted that relevant matching data for the deployment area is obtained based on the environmental characteristics and personnel exercise volume data within the sports facility deployment area. The relevant matching data includes: the oxygen content within the deployment area. Oxygen content is an important environmental factor in high-altitude areas. In this embodiment, the oxygen content data is monitored and collected in real time by sensors; standard atmospheric oxygen, which is a fixed standard value used to compare the changes in actual oxygen content between high-altitude areas and plain areas, and this value can be adjusted according to geographical location in actual applications; the exercise volume data of personnel. The exercise volume data of personnel within the deployment area is collected by exercise monitoring devices such as fitness bracelets and smartphones, representing their actual exercise conditions when using the facilities. By combining the relevant matching data with the standard exercise volume data of each sports facility, the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility is evaluated.

[0047] Among them, the fitness formula is:

[0048]

[0049] In the formula, K is the regional facility matching degree of the sports facility; ω i is the weight adjustment value of the i-th person within the deployment area; v, ∈ are adjustment coefficients; N is the total number of people within the deployment area; A i is the actual exercise volume of the i-th person within the deployment area; A 0 is the standard exercise volume for using each sports facility; μ is the average exercise volume of all people within the deployment area; K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area.

[0050] It should be noted that ω i is the weight adjustment value of the i-th person within the deployment area. The weight value is determined according to the exercise ability and needs of each person; v, ∈ are adjustment coefficients used to control the influence of exercise volume and deviation; N is the total number of people within the deployment area, and overall evaluation is carried out through this value to avoid the influence of individual extreme values on the results; A i is the actual exercise volume of the i-th person within the deployment area, referring to the exercise situation when an individual uses the sports facility; A 0 is the standard exercise volume for using each sports facility, representing the ideal exercise volume when the facility is designed; μ is the average exercise volume of all people within the deployment area, that is, the average level of exercise volume within the area, reflecting the overall exercise state within the area; K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area, which further adjusts the adaptability of the facilities within the area according to the difference between the oxygen content in the deployment area and the standard atmospheric oxygen.

[0051] The environmental matching value of the deployment area is obtained using the environmental matching formula. The environmental matching formula is:

[0052]

[0053] In the formula, K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area; O p is the oxygen content in the deployment area; O pl is the standard atmospheric oxygen, and γ is the smoothing control parameter.

[0054] It should be explained that K 1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area, which reflects the matching degree between the sports facilities and the environment of their deployment area. O p is the oxygen content in the deployment area, and the oxygen concentration data in the current area is monitored and obtained in real time through sensor devices. For example, the oxygen content in high-altitude areas is low, so K 1 has a low value, indicating that the adaptability of this area to the existing facilities is poor; γ is the smoothing control parameter, which is used to control the influence degree of the oxygen content difference on the environmental matching value.

[0055] S2: According to the regional facility matching degree, the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area are used as the sports facilities to be allocated, and the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area is obtained by using the replacement formula;

[0056] The sports facilities with the regional facility matching degree greater than or equal to the first preset threshold are used as the sports facilities to be allocated. Obtain the standard adaptation age data of each sports facility in the deployment area, the average age data of the personnel in the deployment area, and the damage degree of the sports facilities in the deployment area, and use the replacement formula to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area. Replace the sports facilities with the replacement value greater than or equal to the second preset threshold.

[0057] It should be explained that the sports facilities with the regional facility matching degree greater than or equal to the first preset threshold are used as the sports facilities to be allocated. The first preset threshold is an empirical value or a threshold set according to actual needs. When the regional facility matching degree of the facility exceeds this threshold, the facility will be regarded as suitable for deployment in this area and ready for replacement.

[0058] The replacement formula is as follows:

[0059]

[0060] In the formula, T is the replacement value of the target sports facility; α 1 , α 2 , α 3 are the weight adjustment factors; is the average age of the personnel in the deployment area; AG 0 is the standard preset age; d is the damage degree of the target sports facility; m is the standard adaptation age data of the target sports facility; is the average standard adaptation age data of other sports facilities within the preset range of the target sports facility.

[0061] It should be noted that is the average age of the personnel in the deployment area. As the age increases, some facilities, such as those suitable for teenagers, are no longer suitable for use. Therefore, this data is crucial for the replacement decision of facilities; AG 0 is the standard preset age, which is the preset standard age used to evaluate whether the personnel in the deployment area are aging or young, and helps to evaluate whether the current facilities meet the usage needs of the target group; d is the damage degree of the target sports facility, and the damage degree data of each sports facility is obtained based on the usage situation and maintenance history of the facility; m is the standard adaptation age data of the target sports facility, which refers to the standard age adapted when the sports facility is designed, usually the age range of the expected user group of the facility; is the average standard adaptation age data of other sports facilities within the preset range of the target sports facility. This data is for the surrounding sports facilities of the target sports facility within the preset range, and is used to measure whether the target sports facility is reasonable. That is, young sports facilities have strong activity. If they are deployed around aging sports facilities, the probability of dangerous collision phenomena will increase, so adjustments are needed.

[0062] S3: According to the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area, the sports facilities with a replacement value greater than or equal to the second preset threshold in the deployment area are used as the sports facilities to be replaced;

[0063] It should be noted that when the replacement value of the target sports facility is greater than or equal to the second preset threshold, it means that the facility has poor adaptability and is no longer suitable for use in this area, so it needs to be replaced.

[0064] S4: Obtain the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated. According to the adjustment data, use the adaptation adjustment formula to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation value.

[0065] When the replacement value of the target sports facility is greater than or equal to the second preset threshold, the target sports facility is used as the sports facility to be replaced, and the adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated is obtained. The adjustment data includes the standard adaptation age data of the sports facilities to be allocated, the maintenance cost of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the environmental adaptation degree data of the sports facilities to be allocated. According to the adjustment data, the adaptation adjustment formula is used for the sports facilities to be allocated respectively to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, and the sports facility with the largest adaptation value is used to replace the sports facility to be replaced.

[0066] The adaptation adjustment formula is as follows:

[0067]

[0068] In the formula, S is the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; S1 AG is the age adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated; cost is the maintenance cost of the sports facility to be allocated; en is the environmental adaptation degree between the environment where the target sports facility is located and the best use environment of the sports facility to be allocated.

[0069] It should be noted that S is the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated, indicating whether the sports facility to be allocated is suitable for deployment in the current area. The higher the adaptation value, the more suitable the facility is for deployment; S 1 AG is the age adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated, which is calculated by comparing the standard adaptation age of the sports facility to be allocated with the average age of the people in the area; cost is the maintenance cost of the sports facility to be allocated, and it is more recommended to use when the maintenance cost of the sports facility to be allocated is low; en is the environmental adaptation degree between the environment where the target sports facility is located and the best use environment of the sports facility to be allocated. If the environment where the target sports facility is located has a high matching degree with the best use environment of the sports facility to be allocated, the adaptation value increases. For example, if the environment where the target sports facility is located is indoors and is less affected by wind, and at the same time the best use environment of the sports facility to be allocated also requires a windless environment, then the environmental adaptation degree is high and it is suitable for deployment.

[0070] The age adaptation value formula is used to obtain the age adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated, and the age adaptation value formula is as follows:

[0071]

[0072] AG g is the standard adaptation age data of the sports facility to be allocated; is the average age of the people in the deployment area; AG 0 is the standard preset age.

[0073] It should be noted that when the population ages, the value of is greater than 0, and at this time is 1, then when is greater than 0, the higher the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated; when is less than 0, the lower the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated; when the population becomes younger, the value of is less than 0, and at this time is -1, then when is greater than 0, the lower the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated; when is less than 0, the higher the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated, and the selection and replacement of aging or younger sports facilities are completed.

[0074] Embodiment 2: On the basis of Embodiment 1, as Figure 2 shown, a comprehensive evaluation management system for sports facilities includes:

[0075] A data collection module, configured to obtain relevant matching data within the deployment area, standard adaptation age data of each sports facility within the deployment area, average age data of the personnel within the deployment area, damage degrees of the sports facilities within the deployment area, and adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated;

[0076] A regional facility matching degree calculation module, configured to use a fitness formula based on the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility;

[0077] An environment matching value calculation module, configured to obtain the environment matching value of the deployment area by using an environment matching formula;

[0078] A sports facility to be allocated acquisition module, which takes the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as the sports facilities to be allocated according to the regional facility matching degree;

[0079] A replacement value calculation module, configured to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities within the deployment area by using a replacement formula;

[0080] A sports facility to be replaced acquisition module, which takes the sports facilities within the deployment area with a replacement value greater than or equal to a second preset threshold as the sports facilities to be replaced according to the replacement value of the sports facilities within the deployment area;

[0081] An adaptation value acquisition module, configured to respectively use an adaptation adjustment formula for the sports facilities to be allocated according to the adjustment data to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated;

[0082] A replacement module, configured to replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated.

[0083] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention rather than to limit the protection scope of the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that the technical solutions of the present invention can be modified or equivalently replaced without departing from the essence and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention.

Claims

1. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1: Obtain relevant matching data in the deployment area of ​​each sports facility, and use a fitness formula according to the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility; S2: according to the regional facility matching degree, the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area are used as the sports facilities to be allocated, and the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area is obtained by using the replacement formula; S3: according to the replacement values ​​of the sports facilities in the deployment area, taking the sports facilities in the deployment area whose replacement values ​​are greater than or equal to a second preset threshold as the sports facilities to be replaced; S4: Acquire adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated, use an adaptation adjustment formula according to the adjustment data to obtain adaptation values ​​of the sports facilities to be allocated, and replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation values.

2. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method of obtaining relevant matching data within the deployment area of ​​each sports facility, and using a fitness formula based on the relevant matching data to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility includes: obtaining relevant matching data within the deployment area of ​​each sports facility, the relevant matching data including the oxygen content in the deployment area, standard atmospheric oxygen and exercise data of each person in the deployment area, inputting the relevant matching data and the standard exercise data of each sports facility into the fitness formula to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility.

3. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of inputting the relevant matching data and the standard exercise volume data of each sports facility into a fitness formula to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility includes: wherein the fitness formula is: Where K is the regional facility matching degree of sports facilities; ω i is the weight adjustment value of the i-th person in the deployment area; v,∈ is the adjustment coefficient; N is the total number of people in the deployment area; A i is the actual amount of exercise of the i-th person in the deployment area; A0 is the standard amount of exercise using each sports facility; μ is the mean amount of exercise of all people in the deployment area; K1 is the environmental matching value of the deployment area.

4. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 3, characterized in that: K1 is the environment matching value of the deployment area, including: using the environment matching formula to obtain the environment matching value of the deployment area, wherein the environment matching formula is: Where K1 is the environment matching value of the deployment area; p is the oxygen content in the deployment area; O pl is standard atmospheric oxygen, and γ is a smoothing control parameter.

5. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 4, characterized in that: The method of using the sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as the sports facilities to be allocated according to the regional facility matching degree, and using the replacement formula to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area includes: using the sports facilities with a regional facility matching degree greater than or equal to a first preset threshold as the sports facilities to be allocated, obtaining the standard adaptation age data of each sports facility in the deployment area, the average age data of the personnel in the deployment area and the damage degree of the sports facilities in the deployment area, and using the replacement formula to obtain the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area, and replacing the sports facilities with the replacement value greater than or equal to the second preset threshold.

6. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 5, characterized in that: The method of obtaining the replacement value of the sports facilities in the deployment area by using the replacement formula and replacing the sports facilities whose replacement value is greater than or equal to the second preset threshold comprises: wherein the replacement formula is: In the formula, T is the replacement value of the target sports facility; α1, α2, α3 are weight adjustment factors; is the average age of personnel in the deployment area; AG0 is the standard preset age; d is the degree of injury of the target sports facility; m is the standard adaptation age data of the target sports facility; m0 is the average standard adaptation age data of other sports facilities within the preset range of the target sports facility.

7. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 6, characterized in that: The step of obtaining adjustment data of the sports facilities to be allocated, using an adaptation adjustment formula according to the adjustment data to obtain adaptation values ​​of the sports facilities to be allocated, and replacing the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation values ​​includes: When the replacement value of the target sports facility is greater than or equal to the second preset threshold, the target sports facility is used as the sports facility to be replaced, and the adjustment data of the sports facility to be allocated is obtained, the adjustment data including the standard adaptation age data of the sports facility to be allocated, the maintenance cost of the sports facility to be allocated and the environmental adaptability data of the sports facility to be allocated. According to the adjustment data, the adaptation adjustment formula is used for the sports facilities to be allocated respectively to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facility to be allocated, and the sports facility with the largest adaptation value is used to replace the sports facility to be replaced.

8. A comprehensive evaluation and management method for sports facilities according to claim 7, characterized in that: The step of using the adaptation adjustment formula for the sports facilities to be allocated according to the adjustment data to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated includes: wherein the adaptation adjustment formula is: In the formula, S is the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; S1 is the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; cost is the maintenance cost of the sports facilities to be allocated; en is the environmental adaptability between the environment in which the target sports facilities are located and the optimal use environment of the sports facilities to be allocated.

9. A sports facility comprehensive evaluation management method according to claim 8, characterized in that: S1 is the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, including: using the age adaptation value formula to obtain the age adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated, wherein the age adaptation value formula is: AG g Adapt age data to the standards for sports facilities to be allocated; is the average age of personnel in the deployment area; AG0 is the standard preset age.

10. A sports facility comprehensive evaluation management system, according to a sports facility comprehensive evaluation management method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that: include: A data collection module is used to obtain relevant matching data in the deployment area, standard adaptation age data of each sports facility in the deployment area, average age data of personnel in the deployment area, damage degree of sports facilities in the deployment area and adjustment data of sports facilities to be allocated; A regional facility matching degree calculation module, used to obtain the regional facility matching degree of each sports facility using a fitness formula according to the relevant matching data; An environment matching value calculation module, used to obtain an environment matching value of a deployment area using an environment matching formula; A module for acquiring sports facilities to be allocated, which selects sports facilities suitable for the deployment area as sports facilities to be allocated according to the matching degree of the regional facilities; A replacement value calculation module, used for obtaining replacement values ​​of sports facilities in a deployment area using a replacement formula; A sports facility to be replaced acquisition module, configured to select sports facilities in the deployment area whose replacement values ​​are greater than or equal to a second preset threshold as sports facilities to be replaced according to the replacement values ​​of the sports facilities in the deployment area; An adaptation value acquisition module, used to use the adaptation adjustment formula for the sports facilities to be allocated according to the adjustment data to obtain the adaptation value of the sports facilities to be allocated; The replacement module is used to replace the sports facilities to be replaced according to the adaptation values ​​of the sports facilities to be allocated.

Images